Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2014 Jul 14;8(3):863–870. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1845

Protective roles of erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins in chronic heart failure with anemia

SHUQIN ZHOU 1,*, YUGANG ZHUANG 1,*, WEI ZHAO 1,*, BOJIE JIANG 1, HUI PAN 1, XIANGYU ZHANG 1, HU PENG 1,, YANQING CHEN 1,
PMCID: PMC4113650  PMID: 25120615

Abstract

Anemia is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and is frequently treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs). Previous studies, however, have been relatively short in duration and have not provided conclusive data on the safety or clinical efficacy of ESP treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and therapeutic effects of ESPs in patients with anemia and CHF. A systematic literature search in EMBASE and MEDLINE from their inception to July 2013 was performed, and clinical studies that evaluated the effects of ESPs among patients with CHF were identified. Randomized clinical trials comparing the effects of ESP treatment with those of placebo treatment or usual care regimes in anemic patients with CHF were included. Nine randomized, controlled trials were identified, comprising 750 patients with CHF and anemia receiving ESP treatment for between three months and one year. ESP treatment had a significantly lower risk of CHF hospitalization [relative risk (RR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32–0.70; P=0.0002] and a moderate reduction in mortality risk (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.38–1.19; P=0.18). Treatment with ESPs in patients with symptomatic CHF and anemia resulted in significant improvements in hemoglobin, hematocrit and brain natriuretic peptide levels, as well as exercise capacity, renal function, New York Heart Association class and left ventricular ejection fraction. In conclusion, this study found that treatment with ESPs exerts beneficial effects against CHF and is not associated with a higher mortality rate or adverse effects. These outcomes support the instigation of a trial evaluating the treatment of anemia with ESPs in patients with chronic CHF.

Keywords: anemia, chronic heart failure, erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins, hospitalization, mortality

Introduction

Anemia is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) (14) and is associated with increased morbidity. The pathogenesis of anemia in CHF is complex and is associated with a number of factors, including renal dysfunction, plasma volume fluctuation, inflammation, hematinic deficiencies and drug treatment (5). Initial data from a large observational study of patients with CHF attending cardiology clinics showed that 33% had a low hemoglobin (Hb), using the most commonly employed definition of the World Health Organization (5). Notably, anemia has been described as an independent predictor of the risk of mortality and hospitalization due to diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in patients with CHF; diastolic and LV dysfunction may both result in disability or mortality (68).

A number of preliminary studies have reported that the correction of low Hb concentrations using erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs) may improve cardiac and renal function and reduce the requirement for hospitalization and diuretics in patients with CHF (910). Erythropoietin (EPO) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating, 165-amino acid glycoprotein hormone secreted by the kidney in response to hypoxia and has a pivotal role in promoting an increase in red blood cells. EPO acts by stimulating the generation and release of cells from the bone marrow, thus improving the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. EPO performs additional functions beyond that of hematopoiesis, including cardioprotection (11).

Most interventional studies conducted in patients with CHF and anemia have shown an improvement in exercise tolerance and functional status in response to treatment; however, these were uncontrolled studies or controlled studies without a placebo. Furthermore, these studies were relatively short in duration and not designed to provide conclusive data on the safety or clinical efficacy of ESP treatment. In addition, the small sample sizes produced underpowered results. In this study, a meta-analysis was performed to explore the safety and therapeutic effects of ESPs in patients with anemia and CHF.

Materials and methods

Selection of published studies

The databases EMBASE (www.embase.com) and MEDLINE (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) were searched from their inception to July 2013, and clinical studies that evaluated the effects of ESPs among patients with CHF were systematically identified. No language restriction was applied. Search terms included ‘heart failure’ or ‘congestive heart failure’ or ‘chronic heart failure’ or ‘CHF’ combined with ‘recombinant erythropoietin’ or ‘darbepoetin’ or ‘erythropoietin’ or ‘erythropoiesis’. The titles and abstracts of studies identified in the automated search were scanned to exclude any irrelevant articles. The full texts of the remaining articles were read to determine whether they contained relevant information on the topic of interest. Cited references of retrieved and review articles were assessed to confirm that the assembled list of relevant publications was complete.

Fig. 1 illustrates the search and selection process. The titles and abstracts of the primary 561 publications identified were reviewed and 547 were discarded for one of the following reasons: (i) The study did not discuss the association between ESPs and HF; (ii) the study was not a clinical study; (iii) the study was not a human study. Bibliographies were also searched for publications not identified in the database searches but no more additional publications were found. In total, the full texts of 14 articles were read. If the type of HF was not CHF (e.g. systolic HF) (12) or no precise mortality or hospitalization rate could be calculated (1316), the publications were excluded. Nine publications were ultimately selected for the meta-analysis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study selection diagram. CHF, chronic heart failure; ESP, erythropoiesis stimulating protein.

Data extraction and quality assessment

The eligibility of all studies retrieved from the databases was independently evaluated and the relevant data from each study were extracted using a unified data form. The items included in the data form were as follows: (i) Study name (with first author’s name and year of publication); (ii) journal name; (iii) location; (iv) study design; (v) study population (case and control); (vi) inclusion criteria; (vii) exclusion criteria; (viii) range for follow-up; (ix) end-points. Two separate lists from two independent authors were compared, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Relative risks (RRs) were recorded or calculated.

Each study was evaluated for quality according to the guidelines provided by the United States Preventive Task Force. The following characteristics were assessed: (i) Duration of follow-up (>6 months); (ii) adequacy of follow-up (reporting loss rate of follow-up); (iii) definition of anemia; (iv) full specification of outcome; (v) study sample representative for the unexposed population; (vi) full specification of clinical and demographic variables; (vii) explanation of sample selection; (viii) clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were graded as ‘poor’ quality if they met <5 criteria, ‘fair’ if they met 5–6 criteria and ‘good’ if they met >7 criteria. Outcomes assessed were mortality and CHF hospitalization rate.

Statistical analysis

To compute a summary RR with a 95% confidence interval (CI), a study-specific, most-adjusted RR and its 95% CI was used in all analyses. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of the funnel plots created by plotting the RR to standard error (SE) for all nine studies.

Inter-study heterogeneity was examined using Cochran’s Q and I2 statistics. The I2 statistic assesses the percentage of variability in the effect estimates that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance. A fixed-effects model was used if P<0.10 or I2 >50% for heterogeneity, otherwise a random-effects model was utilized. The RR was transformed to a natural log scale and the SEs were calculated. The analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, 2012).

Results

Literature search, study characteristics and quality assessment

Following the exclusion of duplicates, 561 potentially relevant studies were reviewed, with nine clinical studies meeting the inclusion criteria and subsequently being analyzed (Fig. 1). The baseline characteristics of the studies included are summarized in Table I. The nine studies, published between 2001 and 2011, followed 750 patients with CHF and anemia receiving ESP treatment for between three months and one year. The inclusion criteria for anemia differed from Hb (1723) to hematocrit (Hct) (24). Five studies used EPO as the ESP, while the remaining four used darbepoetin-α. All studies were conducted in Europe with a ‘fair’ quality score.

Table I.

Summarized information of included studies.

First author (year) Study design No. of patients (ESP/Placebo) Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria ESP Follow-up Quality
Silverberg (2001) Single-center study, randomized, open-label 32 (16/16) LVEF: 40%
Hb: 10–11.5 g/dl
Secondary causes of anemia EPO 8.2 months Fair
Mancini (2003) Single-center study, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled 23 (15/8) NYHA: III/IV
Hct <35%
Non-ambulatory patients, continuous inotropic agents, iron deficiency anemia, sCr >2.5 mg/dl α-EPO 3 months Fair
Palazzuoli (2006) Single-center study, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 38 (20/18) NYHA: III/IV
Hb <11 g/dl
Secondary causes of anemia, isolated diastolic HF, <12 weeks MI, sCr <5.0 mg/dl β-EPO 3 months Fair
Ponikowski (2007) Multi-center study, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 41 (19/22) Symptomatic CHF
LVEF <40%
Hb: 9–12 g/dl
Blood transfusion or ESP within 12 weeks, sCr >3.0 mg/dl α-DPO 26 weeks Fair
Van Veldhuisen (2007) Multi-center study, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 165 (56 WD+54 FD/55) Symptomatic CHF
LVEF <40%
Hb: 9–12.5 g/dl
sCr >3.0 mg/dl α-DPO 26 weeks Fair
Ghali (2008) Multi-center study, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 319 (162/157) NYHA: II–IV
LVEF <40%
Hb <12.5 g/dl
sCr >3.0 mg/dl α-DPO 1 year Fair
Parissis (2009) Single-center study, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled 30 (15/15) sCr >2.5 mg/dl α-DPO 3 months Fair
Palazzuoli (2009) Single-center study, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 58 (29/29) NYHA: III–IV, Hb <11.5 g/dl, LVEF <40% Intestinal bleeding, gastric lesions, vitamin B12 deficiency, severe renal failure β-EPO 1 year Fair
Palazzuoli (2011) Single-center study, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 42 (13 α-EPO+14 β-EPO/25) NYHA: III–IV
Hb <11.5 g/dl
Cr clearance: 30–60 ml/min
Isolated diastolic dysfunction, more than moderate valvular disease, recent MI, modifiable causes of anemia severe renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding α-EPO/β-EPO 1 year Fair

FD, fixed dose; WD, weight-adjusted dose; EPO, erythropoietin; ESP, erythropoiesis-stimulating protein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; Hct, hematocrit; Hb, hemoglobin; CHF, chronic heart failure; Cr, creatinine; sCr, Serum Cr; MI, myocardial infarction; DPO, darbepoetin.

Eight of the nine studies reported detailed CHF hospitalization. Of the 398 patients with CHF in the ESP treatment group, 50 were admitted to hospital (12.6%), whilst 82 of the 330 placebo-treated patients were hospitalized (24.8%). A significantly reduced hospitalization risk was identified for patients with CHF treated with ESPs compared with those treated with placebo (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32–0.70; P=0.0002) (Fig. 2). With regard to the outcomes, no statistically significant differences in heterogeneity were found between the included studies for hospitalization (I2=9%, P=0.36), and there was no obvious indication of publication bias.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pooled risk ratio for hospitalization in randomized, placebo-controlled trials of erythropoiesis-stimulating protein treatment in patients with heart failure and anemia. CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel Haenszel; EPO, erythropoietin.

Eight of the nine studies reported details of CHF mortality rate. Of the 397 patients with CHF in the ESP treatment group, 23 patients succumbed during the study (5.8%), compared with 29 of the 329 placebo-treated patients (8.8%). This resulted in a moderate reduction, without reaching statistical significance, in mortality risk for patients with CHF treated with ESPs (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.38–1.19; P=0.18) compared with those treated with placebo (Fig. 3). No statistically significant differences in heterogeneity were found between the included studies for hospitalization (I2=0%, P=0.71), and there was no obvious indication of publication bias.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pooled risk ratio for mortality in randomized, placebo-controlled trials of erythropoiesis-stimulating protein treatment in patients with heart failure and anemia. CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel Haenszel; EPO, erythropoietin.

The baseline and achieved Hb and Hct levels and red blood cell count of the different studies are shown in Table II. Patients treated with ESPs showed enhanced recovery from anemia (P<0.05). Furthermore, patients with CHF treated with ESPs exhibited improved exercise capacity with regard to exercise duration, volume of oxygen consumption and distance walked during exercise, as compared with controls (Table III). Following treatment with ESPs, a reduction in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and creatinine was observed in patients with CHF compared with controls (Table IV). It was additionally detected that ESP treatment significantly improved the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and slowed the deterioration of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with CHF (Table V).

Table II.

Comparison of anemia following ESP treatment.

First author (year) No. of patients (ESP/Placebo) Baseline Hb (g/dl) Hb at end (g/dl) Baseline Hct (g/dl) Hct at end (%) Baseline RBCs (1/ml) RBCs at end (x10x/ml)






ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo
Silverberg (2001) 32 (16/16) 10.3 10.9 12.9 10.8
Mancini (2003) 23 (15/8) 11.0 10.9 14.3 11.5
Palazzuoli (2006) 38 (20/18) 10.4 10.6 12.4 10.5 30.0 32.0 36.4 31.0 3.3 3.4 4.2 3.2
Ponikowski (2007) 41 (19/22) 11.8 11.6 13.9 12.3
Van Veldhuisen (2007) 165 (56 WD+54 FD/55) 11.5 11.4 13.3 11.4
Ghali (2008) 319 (162/157) 11.5 11.3 13.6 11.8
Parissis (2008) 32 (21/11) 11.0 11.4 12.8 11.8
Kourea (2008) 41 (21/20) 10.9 11.4 12.8 11.7
Palazzuoli (2009) 58 (29/29) 9.6 9.3 11.9 10.5 30.8 31.6 34.1 32.3 3.2 3.2 3.8 3.3
Parissis (2009) 30 (15/15) 11.2 11.5 12.8 11.9
Palazzuoli (2011) 42 (13 α-EPO/14 β-EPO/25) 10.4/9.0 9.3 12.3/11.7 10.6 30.6/30.8 31.6 34.2/34.0 32.3 3.6/3.2 3.2 3.9/3.8 3.3

ESP, erythropoiesis-stimulating protein; WD, weight-adjusted dose; FD, fixed dose; RBC, red blood cells; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; EPO, erythropoietin.

Table III.

Comparison of exercise capacity following ESP treatment.

First author (year) No. of patients (ESP/Placebo) Baseline exercise duration (sec) Exercise duration at end (sec) Baseline VO2 (ml/kg/min) VO2 at end (ml/kg/min) Baseline distance walked (m) Distance walked at end (m)






ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo
Mancini (2003) 23 (15/8) 590 542 657 459 11.0 10.0 12.7 9.5 362 283 405 321
Palazzuoli (2006) 38 (20/18) 348 348 468 360 12.8 12.5 15.1 12.0 278 285 356 266
Ponikowski (2007) 41 (19/22) 559 597 526 468 12.4 12.2 12.4 11.7
Ghali (2008) 319 (162/157) 408 409 465.3 455.5
Van Veldhuisen (2007) 165 (56 WD+54 FD/55) 287 304 321 315
Parissis (2008) 32 (21/11) 227 214 296 167
Kourea (2008) 41 (21/20) 201 237 274 204
Parissis (2009) 30 (15/15) 227 214 296 167

WD, weight-adjusted dose; FD, fixed dose; ESP, erythropoiesis-stimulating protein; VO2, oxygen volume.

Table IV.

Comparison of BNP and creatinine following ESP treatment.

First author (year) No. of patients (ESP/Placebo) Baseline BNP (pg/ml) BNP at end (pg/ml) Baseline creatinine (mg/dl) Creatinine at end (mg/dl)




ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo
Palazzuoli (2006) 38 (20/18) 568 585 271 496 2.5 2.4 1.8 2.2
Parissis (2008) 32 (21/11) 1102 788 661 1212
Kourea (2008) 41 (21/20) 829 725 517 1040
Parissis (2009) 30 (15/15) 1105 988 669 1202
Palazzuoli (2009) 58 (29/29) 702 690 422 535 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.4
Palazzuoli (2011) 42 (13 α-EPO+14 β-EPO/25) 512/659 610 335/449 582 2.3/2.3 2.3 2.0/2.2 2.3
Silverberg (2001) 32(16/16) 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.8
Van Veldhuisen (2007) 165 (56 WD+54 FD/55) 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.6

BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; ESP, erythropoiesis-stimulating protein; EPO, erythropoietin; WD, weight-adjusted dose; FD, fixed dose.

Table V.

Comparison of heart function following ESP treatment.

First author (year) No. of patients (ESP/Placebo) Baseline NYHA class NYHA class at end Baseline LVEF (%) LVEF at end (%)




ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo ESP Placebo
Palazzuoli (2006) 38 (20/18) 3.5 3.4 2.8 3.6
Parissis (2008) 32 (21/11) 2.8 2.7 2.1 3.2 26 28 31 25
Palazzuoli (2009) 58 (29/29) 3.35 3.32 2.77 3.28 30.1 30.9 32.3 30.9
Palazzuoli (2011) 42 (13 α-EPO/14 β-EPO/25) 3.4/3.5 3.3 2.7/2.8 3.2
Van Veldhuisen (2007) 165 (56 WD+54 FD/55) 29 27 28.98 28.27
Kourea (2008) 41 (21/20) 26 28 32 28
Parissis (2009) 30 (15/15) 28 27 33 28

WD, weight-adjusted dose; FD, fixed dose; ESP, erythropoiesis-stimulating protein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; EPO, erythropoietin.

Discussion

EPO receptors are expressed in both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells. ESPs, which are clinically used exclusively for erythropoiesis in patients with anemia, demonstrate potential in the treatment of pathological conditions of nonhematopoietic organs, including the brain and heart (3). Further investigations have demonstrated that ESP-mediated cardioprotection is mainly achieved through reducing apoptosis, increasing neovascularization, mobilizing endothelial progenitor cells and inducing angiogenesis through the phosphorylation and activation of signaling pathways (7), including Janus kinase 1/2, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), STAT5 and phosphoinositide-3-kinase (25).

Patients with CHF together with anemia experience higher rates of hospitalization than those without anemia. A prior meta-analysis by van der Meer et al (26) of seven prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the use of ESPs in CHF enrolling 650 patients suggested a statistically significant decrease of 41% in hospitalizations due to HF in ESP-treated patients compared with controls. A similar result was noted in the present study, and was consistent with a pooled, patient-level analysis of three randomized trials of darbepoetin α that enrolled 516 subjects with HF (27).

In the present pooled analysis of patients with HF, it was found that the anemia of patients with CHF improved with ESP treatment. The majority of the changes in the anemic condition occurred together with increases in Hb and Hct; however, the most significant improvements were observed after one year. A moderate reduction in mortality risk was also observed for patients with CHF treated with ESPs, compared with those treated with placebo. This may be due in part to the improved oxygenation and reduced oxidative stress caused by the improvement in the anemia or due to the direct effects of the drug. Another meta-analysis including >150,000 patients with CHF identified that low Hb levels increased the risk of all-cause mortality over a six-month to five-year follow-up period, irrespective of whether CHF was due to systolic or diastolic dysfunction (28). Other research, however, has reported contradictory results (26). Differences may be due to skews in data caused by patients with a poor initial response to the ESP, who went on to receive higher doses of the drug and had increased rates of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. The present study found that patients who received ESP treatment exhibited a statistically significant improvement in exercise capacity and confirmed a previous report, according to which subcutaneous EPO administration improves exercise capacity, quality of life and LVEF in patients with CHF and anemia (29).

BNP levels are a reflection of ventricular stretching and are accepted as an effective marker of the presence and severity of CHF, since high levels of BNP are independent predictors of adverse clinical outcomes in CHF (22). Neurohormonal and metabolic effects induced by anemia can result in direct myocardial toxicity, myocardial hypertrophy, and salt and water retention. A reduction in BNP levels in patients with CHF treated with ESPs was observed in the present study. This decrease in BNP levels could be associated with improvements in a number of aspects, including improvements in cardiac function as a result of increased oxygen supply to the heart, reduced load caused by the prevention of anemia-induced tachycardia and increased stroke volume, reduction in plasma volume and a reduction in the activity of the sympathetic and renin angiotensin-aldosterone system, which occurs in anemia (3,30). In the present study, the improvement in renal function in the treated group was reflected by the improvement in creatinine level. Since renal failure is one of the primary negative prognostic factors for mortality and morbidity in CHF, the preservation of renal function by reversal of anemia is another important contribution of ESP treatment for improved prognosis in CHF (5). In this context, the data demonstrated a trend towards a reduction in cardiac adverse events and a significant improvement in NYHA class and LVEF without any other potential adverse effects.

In conclusion, treatment of patients with symptomatic CHF and anemia with ESPs results in significant improvements in hospitalization rate, Hb, Hct and BNP levels, mortality, exercise capacity, renal function, NYHA class and LVEF. These results support the instigation of larger trials investigating the safety and efficacy of ESPs for the treatment of anemia in anemic patients with symptomatic CHF.

References

  • 1.Tang YD, Katz SD. Anemia in chronic heart failure: prevalence, etiology, clinical correlates, and treatment options. Circulation. 2006;113:2454–2461. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Felker GM, Adams KF, Jr, Gattis WA, O’Connor CM. Anemia as a risk factor and therapeutic target in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:959–966. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van der Meer P, Voors AA, Lipsic E, van Gilst WH, van Veldhuisen DJ. Erythropoietin in cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anand I, McMurray JJ, Whitmore J, Warren M, Pham A, McCamish MA, Burton PB. Anemia and its relationship to clinical outcome in heart failure. Circulation. 2004;110:149–154. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134279.79571.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Westenbrink BD, Visser FW, Voors AA, Smilde TD, Lipsic E, Navis G, Hillege HL, van Gilst WH, van Veldhuisen DJ. Anaemia in chronic heart failure is not only related to impaired renal perfusion and blunted erythropoietin production, but to fluid retention as well. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:166–171. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Felker GM, Gattis WA, Leimberger JD, Adams KF, Cuffe MS, Gheorghiade M, O’Connor CM. Usefulness of anemia as a predictor of death and rehospitalization in patients with decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:625–628. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00740-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kosiborod M, Smith GL, Radford MJ, Foody JM, Krumholz HM. The prognostic importance of anemia in patients with heart failure. Am J Med. 2003;114:112–119. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01498-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mozaffarian D, Nye R, Levy WC. Anemia predicts mortality in severe heart failure: the prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation (PRAISE) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1933–1939. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00425-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Silverberg DS, Wexler D, Blum M, Keren G, Sheps D, Leibovitch E, Brosh D, Laniado S, Schwartz D, Yachnin T, Shapira I, Gavish D, Baruch R, Koifman B, Kaplan C, Steinbruch S, Iaina A. The use of subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron for the treatment of the anemia of severe, resistant congestive heart failure improves cardiac and renal function and functional cardiac class, and markedly reduces hospitalizations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1737–1744. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00613-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Silverberg DS, Wexler D, Sheps D, Blum M, Keren G, Baruch R, Schwartz D, Yachnin T, Steinbruch S, Shapira I, Laniado S, Iaina A. The effect of correction of mild anemia in severe, resistant congestive heart failure using subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron: a randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1775–1780. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01248-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ruifrok WP, de Boer RA, Westenbrink BD, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gilst WH. Erythropoietin in cardiac disease: new features of an old drug. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;585:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Swedberg K, Young JB, Anand IS, Cheng S, Desai AS, Diaz R, Maggioni AP, McMurray JJ, O’Connor C, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, Sun Y, Tendera M, van Veldhuisen DJ RED-HF Committees; RED-HF Investigators. Treatment of anemia with darbepoetin-alfa in systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1210–1219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cleland JG, Sullivan JT, Ball S, Horowitz JD, Agoram B, Rosser D, Yates W, Tin L, Fuentealba P, Burton PB. Once-monthly administration of darbepoetin α for the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure and anemia: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2005;46:155–161. doi: 10.1097/01.fjc.0000167013.77092.c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kourea K, Parissis JT, Farmakis D, Paraskevaidis I, Panou F, Filippatos G, Kremastinos DT. Effects of darbepoetin alfa on quality of life and emotional stress in anemic patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15:365–369. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f849d0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cosyns B, Velez-Roa S, Droogmans S, Pierard LA, Lancellotti P. Effects of erythropoietin administration on mitral regurgitation and left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol. 2010;138:306–307. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Parissis JT, Kourea K, Panou F, Farmakis D, Paraskevaidis I, Ikonomidis I, Filippatos G, Kremastinos DT. Effects of darbepoetin alfa on right and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in anemic patients with chronic heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2008;155:751. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Palazzuoli A, Silverberg D, Iovine F, Capobianco S, Giannotti G, Calabrò A, Campagna SM, Nuti R. Erythropoietin improves anemia exercise tolerance and renal function and reduces B-type natriuretic peptide and hospitalization in patients with heart failure and anemia. Am Heart J. 2006;152:1096. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ponikowski P, Anker SD, Szachniewicz J, Okonko D, Ledwidge M, Zymlinski R, Ryan E, Wasserman SM, Baker N, Rosser D, Rosen SD, Poole-Wilson PA, Banasiak W, Coats AJ, McDonald K. Effect of darbepoetin alfa on exercise tolerance in anemic patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:753–762. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.van Veldhuisen DJ, Dickstein K, Cohen-Solal A, Lok DJ, Wasserman SM, Baker N, Rosser D, Cleland JG, Ponikowski P. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of two dosing regimens of darbepoetin alfa in patients with heart failure and anaemia. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2208–2216. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ghali JK, Anand IS, Abraham WT, Fonarow GC, Greenberg B, Krum H, Massie BM, Wasserman SM, Trotman ML, Sun Y, Knusel B, Armstrong P Study of Anemia in Heart Failure Trial (STAMINA-HeFT) Group. Randomized double-blind trial of darbepoetin alfa in patients with symptomatic heart failure and anemia. Circulation. 2008;117:526–535. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.698514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Palazzuoli A, Silverberg DS, Calabrò A, Spinelli T, Quatrini I, Campagna MS, Franci B, Nuti R. Beta erythropoietin effects on ventricular remodeling, left and right systolic function, pulmonary pressure, and hospitalizations in patients affected with heart failure and anemia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2009;53:462–467. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181a6ac38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Palazzuoli A, Quatrini I, Calabrò A, Antonelli G, Caputo M, Campagna MS, Franci B, Nuti R. Anemia correction by erythropoietin reduces BNP levels, hospitalization rate, and NYHA class in patients with cardio-renal anemia syndrome. Clin Exp Med. 2011;11:43–48. doi: 10.1007/s10238-010-0100-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parissis JT, Kourea K, Andreadou I, Ikonomidis I, Markantonis S, Ioannidis K, Paraskevaidis I, Iliodromitis E, Filippatos G, Kremastinos DT. Effects of Darbepoetin Alfa on plasma mediators of oxidative and nitrosative stress in anemic patients with chronic heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1134–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mancini DM, Katz SD, Lang CC, LaManca J, Hudaihed A, Androne AS. Effect of erythropoietin on exercise capacity in patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2003;107:294–299. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000044914.42696.6a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chateauvieux S, Grigorakaki C, Morceau F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Erythropoietin, erythropoiesis and beyond. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:1291–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.van der Meer P, Groenveld HF, Januzzi JL, Jr, van Veldhuisen DJ. Erythropoietin treatment in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Heart. 2009;95:1309–1314. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.161091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Klapholz M, Abraham WT, Ghali JK, Ponikowski P, Anker SD, Knusel B, Sun Y, Wasserman SM, van Veldhuisen DJ. The safety and tolerability of darbepoetin alfa in patients with anaemia and symptomatic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:1071–1077. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Groenveld HF, Januzzi JL, Damman K, van Wijngaarden J, Hillege HL, van Veldhuisen DJ, van der Meer P. Anemia and mortality in heart failure patients a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:818–827. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weiss G, Goodnough LT. Anemia of chronic disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1011–1023. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Anand IS, Chandrashekhar Y, Ferrari R, Poole-Wilson PA, Harris PC. Pathogenesis of oedema in chronic severe anaemia: studies of body water and sodium, renal function, haemodynamic variables, and plasma hormones. Br Heart J. 1993;70:357–362. doi: 10.1136/hrt.70.4.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES