Abstract
Stereocontrolled Mn-mediated radical addition of alkyl iodides to chiral N-acylhydrazones enables strategic C–C bond disconnection of chiral amines. This strategy was examined in the context of a total synthesis of quinine, generating new findings of functional group compatibility leading to a revised strategy. Completion of a formal synthesis of quinine is presented, validating the application of Mn-mediated radical addition as a useful new C–C bond construction method for alkaloid synthesis. The Mn-mediated addition generates the chiral amine substructure of quinine with complete stereocontrol. Subsequent elaboration includes two successive ring closures to forge the azabicyclo [2.2.2] octane ring system of quincorine, linked to quinine through two known reactions.
The long-established antimalarial properties of quinine (Figure 1) fueled great interest in its synthesis since the very early days of natural product chemistry, endowing quinine with special historical importance in the field.1,2 Successful syntheses are highlighted by the Woodward–Doering formal synthesis of quinine in 1944,3 practical approaches to quinine and quinidine (Figure 1) by Uskokovic, Taylor, and Gates in the 1970s,4 and the first asymmetric total synthesis of quinine as reported by Stork in 2001.5 More recently, syntheses by Jacobsen,6 Kobayashi,7 Williams (7-hydroxyquinine),8 Krische,9 and Aggarwal10 have highlighted a variety of strategies for construction of the azabicyclo [2.2.2] octane ring system of quinine.
Figure 1.
Structures of quinine, quinidine, and quinotoxine.
Quinine attracted our interest in the course of a program to develop new C–C bond construction approaches to chiral amines.11 While numerous indirect methods involving C–N bond construction are available, an attractive alternative is a C–C bond construction via addition to the C=N bond of carbonyl imino derivatives (Figure 2a).12 We introduced novel chiral N-acylhydrazones A13 (Figure 2b) and their use in a variety of addition reactions under mild conditions,14,15 including additions of carbon-centered radicals.16 In general, intermolecular radical additions to imino compounds are attractive complements to polar addition reactions for reasons of functional group compatibility. Despite seminal work by Naito17 and Bertrand18 and others19 to develop such reactions, their strategic use for stereocontrol in total synthesis of multifunctional natural product targets is rare;20 such applications have been slow to emerge because methods exhibiting versatility with respect to both radical and acceptor are limited. On the other hand, the emergence of Mn-mediated intermolecular radical additions has significantly expanded the scope, enabling effective use of primary iodides and precursors bearing electrophilic functionality in either of the coupling components.21 Still, the intermolecular radical addition to imino compounds has yet to be validated as a stereocontrol strategy en route to a complex synthetic target. As an alkaloid of some complexity and synthetic challenge, quinine presented a worthy adversary against which to test the limits of this reaction in a multifunctional molecular setting in natural product synthesis.22
Figure 2.
Asymmetric radical addition in chiral amine synthesis. (a) Strategic C–C bond disconnection. (b) The Mn-mediated radical addition to chiral N-acyl hydrazones. (c) Stereocontrol model for radical addition to chiral N-acyl hydrazones.
Our initial approach to quinine focused upon strategic application of Mn-mediated hybrid radical–ionic annulation, a type of radical–polar crossover reaction23 which we have reported as an entry to piperidine and pyrrolidine synthesis.21a,21b,21e This would entail intermolecular Mn-mediated radical addition (with stereocontrol as indicated in Figure 2c) using multifunctional iodide B as the radical precursor for addition to hydrazone 1 (Scheme 1), bearing the 6-methoxyquinoline group characteristic of quinine. The piperidine annulation would then be completed via SN2-type cyclization employing a suitable leaving group X. The alkene would serve as a handle for a late-stage oxidative cleavage to unveil a two-carbon bridge needed for construction of the quinuclidine ring system.
Testing this approach required the N-acylhydrazone of homoquininaldehyde, prepared via homologation of quininaldehyde (3), which in turn was available from 6-methoxy-4-methylquinoline (2).24 Oxidation of 2 according to Minisci et al.25 afforded 3 in 77% yield (Scheme 2a). Wittig reaction with (methoxymethyl)triphenylphosphorane and condensation with N-aminooxazolidinone 4 delivered hydrazone 1 in low yield (22%, 2 steps). A more efficient route to 1 (Scheme 2b) was achieved via sequential condensations of 6-methoxy-4-methylquinoline with Bredereck's reagent26 and N-aminooxazolidinone 4, furnishing hydrazone 1 in 62% yield for two steps. Its proposed coupling partner, radical precursor 5a, was prepared as previously described.22 The stage was set to attempt the key Mn-mediated coupling. A mixture of hydrazone 1, iodide 5a, and Mn2(CO)10 was subjected to photolysis (Rayonet, 300 nm) in the presence of InCl3, but to our dismay no coupling product was observed.
The anomalous failure of the Mn-mediated coupling of 1 and 5a led us to consider which structural features of the chiral N-acyl hydrazone partner might be interfering with the reaction. Mn-mediated radical additions of iodides containing the silyl ether moiety had previously been successful in various contexts,21b-e so we turned our attention to the functionalized aryl unit. Its compatibility was addressed by a series of control experiments with hydrazones 6a–6c and iodide 7 (Scheme 3).27 Successful Mn-mediated radical addition was observed with hydrazones 6a and 6b, leading to the expected products 8a and 8b in moderate yield (ca. 40%). However, hydrazone 6c, now containing the pyridyl unit, failed to undergo the Mn-mediated coupling reaction at all, consistent with the observations on hydrazone 1. This indicated that the heteroaromatic nitrogen of the quinoline substructure interfered with the Mn-mediated coupling reaction.
The findings above, taken together with a separate series of experiments demonstrating the detrimental effect of the alkene functionality on yield,22 led to a revision of the strategy which entailed two main changes (Scheme 4). First, the 6-methoxyquinoline would need to be introduced during a later stage in the synthesis, perhaps using an organometallic reagent prepared from 4-bromo-6-methoxyquinoline,28 Second, the original late-stage C6–C7 bond cleavage tactic (e.g., alkene ozonolysis) was changed to oxidative cleavage of a vicinal diol, which would require oxidation of the C6–C7 alkene prior to the radical addition.
Synthesis according to this revised plan required diastereoselective preparation of iodide 5b (Scheme 5), accomplished in seven steps from enantiopure diester 9. As previously reported, the key Mn-mediated coupling of 5b and 10 was achieved in 93% yield using only a slight excess of the iodide radical precursor. This prior result was a very attractive way to access adduct 11, but its synthetic utility remained to be realized.
To convincingly demonstrate the utility of the foregoing Mn-mediated coupling, conversion of adduct 11 to quinine (or a known precursor to quinine) would be required. First, the radical–ionic annulation was completed in a stepwise fashion. The SN2-type cyclization of a tosylate derived from 11 proceeded to a piperidine structure analogous to 12,22 but that material could not be advanced due to difficulties in N–N bond cleavage. After some experimentation, it was found that cleavage of the N–N bond prior to piperidine ring construction led to an efficient overall process (Scheme 5). Successive treatment of 11 with n-BuLi, TFAA, and SmI2 cleaved the N–N bond; Mitsunobu conditions then completed the annulation sequence in an efficient manner, albeit stepwise, furnishing piperidine 12 (R = Bn) on 1.1 mmol scale. Next, in preparation to forge the bicyclic quinuclidine ring system characteristic of the cinchona alkaloids, hydrogenative debenzylation of 12 (Scheme 5) afforded the corresponding vicinal diol; exposure to sodium periodate and hydride reduction furnished diol 13 in excellent yield.
To access the azabicyclic quinuclidine ring system, a group selective cyclization of 13, possessing two nearly equivalent hydroxyethyl substituents, was attempted. The diiodide 15 was procured from diol 13 by a standard method (PPh3/I2), but when cyclization was attempted in methanolic ammonia, the result was a mixture of bicyclic tertiary amines 16 (eq 1) favoring an undesired [3.2.1] bicyclic structure 16b.
Prior differentiation of the two hydroxyethyl groups would be needed as a consequence of the undesirable selectivity in cyclization of the diiodide. To this end, when diol 13 was exposed to vinyl acetate in the presence of Candida antarctica lipase (Scheme 5), a 64% yield of a mixture of regioisomeric monoacetates 14a and 14b was obtained in a 1:1.2 ratio, along with 32% of starting material (94% yield based on conversion).
A regio-convergent approach was then adopted as a practical way to make use of both monoacetates 14a and 14b (R = Me); these were both processed with the same set of standard transformations (Scheme 6), converting both to the same bicyclic quinuclidine product 17. For 14a, the sequence entailed conversion of the free hydroxyl group to the corresponding iodide, cyclization in methanolic ammonia, acetate saponification, and selenoxide elimination to generate the vinyl group, producing 17 in 76% overall yield. For 14b, essentially the same tactics were applied in a different order to furnish 17 in 71% yield. Finally, after desilylation (TBAF), the material obtained from both sequences was found to match an authentic sample of quincorine (18). Two known transformations29 close the synthetic pathway from 18 to quinine, and this route therefore completes a formal synthesis.
In conclusion, a Mn-mediated radical–ionic annulation strategy was validated as a synthetic route to quinine. Structural features which interfere with the Mn-mediated radical addition were uncovered via a series of control experiments, which guided revision of the synthetic strategy. After completing the radical–ionic annulation in a stepwise fashion, a problematic group-selectivity issue was surmounted by a regio-convergent process for assembling the quinuclidine ring system, completing a formal synthesis of quinine. This synthesis of quinine offers the first demonstration of the utility of intermolecular radical addition to imino compounds as a stereocontrol strategy in synthesis of complex multifunctional targets.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank NIH (R01-GM67187), NSF (CHE-0749850) and the University of Iowa for generous support of this work.
Footnotes
Supplementary Information Available: Characterization data and selected experimental procedures (PDF).
Dedication: Dedicated with gratitude to Professor Athel Beckwith for his seminal contributions to understanding stereocontrol in free radical reactions.
References and Notes
- 1.Kaufman TS, Rúveda EA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:854–885. doi: 10.1002/anie.200400663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Seeman JI. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:1378–1413. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Woodward RB, Doering WE. J Am Chem Soc. 1945;67:860–874. [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Uskokovic M, Gutzwiller J, Henderson T. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92:203–204. doi: 10.1021/ja00704a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gutzwiller J, Uskokovic M. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92:204–205. doi: 10.1021/ja00704a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gates M, Sugavanam B, Schreiber WL. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92:205–207. doi: 10.1021/ja00704a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Taylor EC, Martin SF. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:8095–8102. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stork G, Niu D, Fujimoto A, Koft ER, Balkovec JM, Tata JR, Dake GR. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:3239–3242. doi: 10.1021/ja004325r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Raheem IT, Goodman SN, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:706–707. doi: 10.1021/ja039550y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Igarashi J, Katsukawa M, Wang YG, Acharya HP, Kobayashi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:3783–3786. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johns Deidre M, Mori Makoto, Williams Robert M. Org Lett. 2006;8:4051–4054. doi: 10.1021/ol061524s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Webber P, Krische MJ. J Org Chem. 2008;73:9379–9387. doi: 10.1021/jo802165k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Illa O, Arshad M, Ros A, McGarrigle EM, Aggarwal VK. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1828–1829. doi: 10.1021/ja9100276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Arshad M, Fernandez MA, McGarrigle EM, Aggarwal VK. Tetrahedron Asym. 2010;21:1771–1776. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Review: Friestad GK. Eur J Org Chem. 2005:3157–3172.
- 12.Reviews: Friestad GK, Mathies AK. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:2541–2569. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.06.117.Vilaivan T, Bhanthumnavin W, Sritana-Anant Y. Curr Org Chem. 2005;9:1315–1392.Ellman JA, Owens TD, Tang TP. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35:984–995. doi: 10.1021/ar020066u.Alvaro G, Savoia D. Synlett. 2002:651–673.Kobayashi S, Ishitani H. Chem Rev. 1999;99:1069–1094. doi: 10.1021/cr980414z.Bloch R. Chem Rev. 1998;98:1407–1438. doi: 10.1021/cr940474e.Davis FA, Zhou P, Chen BC. Chem Soc Rev. 1998;27:13–18.Enders D, Reinhold U. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 1997;8:1895–1946.Denmark SE, Nicaise OJC. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1996:999–1004.
- 13.Shen Y, Friestad GK. J Org Chem. 2002;67:6236–6239. doi: 10.1021/jo0259663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Friestad GK, Ding H. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:4491–4493. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011203)40:23<4491::aid-anie4491>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Friestad GK, Korapala CS, Ding H. J Org Chem. 2006;71:281–289. doi: 10.1021/jo052037d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ding H, Friestad GK. Heterocycles. 2006;70:185–199. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Friestad GK, Qin J. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:8329–8330. [Google Scholar]; (b) Friestad GK, Draghici C, Soukri M, Qin J. J Org Chem. 2005;70:6330–6338. doi: 10.1021/jo050756m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Friestad GK, Shen Y, Ruggles EL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:5061–5063. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Miyabe H, Ushiro C, Naito T. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1997:1789–1790. [Google Scholar]; (b) Miyabe H, Ushiro C, Ueda M, Yamakawa K, Naito T. J Org Chem. 2000;65:176–185. doi: 10.1021/jo991353n. For reviews of the Naito group's work in this area, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Miyabe H, Ueda M, Naito T. Synlett. 2004:1140–1157. [Google Scholar]; (d) Naito T. Chem Pharm Bull. 2008;56:1367–1383. doi: 10.1248/cpb.56.1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Radical additions to chiral glyoxylate imines: Bertrand MP, Feray L, Nouguier R, Stella L. Synlett. 1998:780–782.Bertrand MP, Feray L, Nouguier R, Perfetti P. Synlett. 1999:1148–1150.Bertrand MP, Coantic S, Feray L, Nouguier R, Perfetti P. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:3951–3961.Bertrand M, Feray L, Gastaldi S. Comptes Rend Acad Sci Paris Chimie. 2002;5:623–638.
- 19.Reviews: Friestad GK. In: Chiral Amine Synthesis Methods, Developments and Applications. Nugent T, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2010. pp. 51–74.Akindele T, Yamada K, Tomioka K. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:345–355. doi: 10.1021/ar800166q.Pastori N, Gambarotti C, Punta C. Mini-Rev Org Chem. 2009;6:184–195.Yamada K, Tomioka K. Chem Rev. 2008;108:2874–2886. doi: 10.1021/cr078370u.Friestad GK. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:5461–5496. Selected recent examples:Akindele T, Yamada K, Sejima T, Maekawa M, Yamamoto Y, Nakano M, Tomioka K. Chem Pharm Bull. 2010;58:265–269. doi: 10.1248/cpb.58.265.Spaccini R, Ghilardi A, Pastori N, Clerici A, Punta C, Porta O. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:2044–2052.Valpuesta M, Munoz C, Diaz A, Torres G, Suau R. Eur J Org Chem. 2010:1934–1942.Kim SY, Kim SJ, Jang DO. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:13046–13048. doi: 10.1002/chem.201002071.Lee S, Kim S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:3345–3348.Jang DO, Kim SY. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:16152–16153. doi: 10.1021/ja807685r.Deng G, Li CJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:5601–5604.Godineau E, Landais Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12662–12663. doi: 10.1021/ja075755l.
- 20.Application to penmacric acid (dr 1:1): Ueda M, Ono A, Nakao D, Miyata O, Naito T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:841–844.
- 21.(a) Friestad GK, Qin J. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:9922–9923. doi: 10.1021/ja011312k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Friestad GK, Qin J, Suh Y, Marié JC. J Org Chem. 2006;71:7016–7027. doi: 10.1021/jo061158q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Friestad GK, Deveau AM, Marié JC. Org Lett. 2004;6:3249–3252. doi: 10.1021/ol048986v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Friestad GK, Ji A. Org Lett. 2008;10:2311–2313. doi: 10.1021/ol800733b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Friestad GK, Banerjee K. Org Lett. 2009;11:1095–1098. doi: 10.1021/ol802932v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Korapala CS, Qin J, Friestad GK. Org Lett. 2007;9:4243–4246. doi: 10.1021/ol7017938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Review: Murphy JA. In: Radicals in Organic Synthesis. Renaud P, Sibi MP, editors. Vol. 1. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2001. pp. 298–316. For examples, see:Callaghan O, Lampard C, Kennedy AR, Murphy JA. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 1999;1:995–1001.Jahn U, Muller M, Aussieker S. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:5212–5213.Rivkin A, Nagashima T, Curran DP. Org Lett. 2003;5:419–422. doi: 10.1021/ol0272491.Denes F, Chemla F, Normant JF. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:4043–4046. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250474.Tojino M, Uenoyama Y, Fukuyama T, Ryu I. Chem Commun. 2004:2482–2483. doi: 10.1039/b408746a.Bazin S, Feray L, Vanthuyne N, Bertrand MP. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:4261–4274.Ueda M, Miyabe H, Sugino H, Miyata O, Naito T. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:6190–6193. doi: 10.1002/anie.200502263.
- 24.Kwartler CE, Lindwall HG. J Am Chem Soc. 1937;59:524–526. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vismara E, Fontana F, Minisci F. Gazz Chim Ital. 1987;117:135–136. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bredereck H, Simchen G, Wahl R. Chem Ber. 1968;101:4048. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hydrazones 6a and 6b, lacking the pyridine ring, were prepared from the corresponding aldehydes in the usual manner (references 11, 13-16, 21-22). Hydrazone 6c was prepared in 65% yield from 4-picoline by the same two-stage condensation sequence shown for hydrazone 1. See Supplementary Information.
- 28.Grethe G, Lee HL, Mitt T, Uskokovic MR. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:589–593. [Google Scholar]
- 29.(a) Dehmlow EV, Duttmann S, Neumann B, Stammler HG. Eur J Org Chem. 2002:2087–2093. [Google Scholar]; (b) Grethe G, Lee HL, Mitt T, Uskokovic MR. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:589–93. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.