Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1979 Sep;76(9):4175–4176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4175

Interfacial free energy and the hydrophobic effect

Charles Tanford 1
PMCID: PMC411533  PMID: 16592699

Abstract

Interfacial free energies demonstrate clearly that the antipathy between hydrocarbon and water rests on the strong attraction of water for itself. However, the unfavorable free energy associated with this antipathy, per unit area of contact between bulk hydrocarbon and water, is about 3-fold larger than a similar figure derived from solubility data per unit area of contact between a single dissolved hydrocarbon molecule and water. The discrepancy illustrates the difficulty in applying macroscopic concepts such as “interfacial surface” at the molecular level and can be formally resolved, at least qualitatively, by the predicted effect of surface curvature on surface tension.

Keywords: surface tension, interfacial tension, molecular surface area

Full text

PDF
4175

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chothia C. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins. Nature. 1974 Mar 22;248(446):338–339. doi: 10.1038/248338a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hermann R. B. Use of solvent cavity area and number of packed solvent molecules around a solute in regard to hydrocarbon solubilities and hydrophobic interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Oct;74(10):4144–4145. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hermann R. E. Selective, conservative operations for cancer of the breast. Cleve Clin Q. 1975 Summer;42(2):163–169. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.42.2.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hildebrand J. H. Is there a "hydrophobic effect"? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):194–194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KAUZMANN W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1–63. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60608-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Reynolds J. A., Gilbert D. B., Tanford C. Empirical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):2925–2927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tanford C. The hydrophobic effect and the organization of living matter. Science. 1978 Jun 2;200(4345):1012–1018. doi: 10.1126/science.653353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES