Abstract
Background:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important cause of mortality worldwide.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in residents who were ≥40 years old and living in a heavily industrialised city of Turkey, Kocaeli, using the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Initiative questionnaire.
Study Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Methods:
1035 residents ≥40 years old and living in Kocaeli were surveyed. Spirometry and the basic BOLD questionnaire was performed.
Results:
946 subjects entered into the analysis. The prevalence of stage I or higher COPD was 13.3% (8.7% for women and 16.5% for men), the prevalence of COPD at GOLD stage II or higher was 7.1% (4.1% for women and 9.2% for men). We also noted a high prevalence of COPD in never-smokers.
Conclusion:
Besides cigarette smoking, occupational exposure to fumes, chemicals and dusts might have also contributed to the high prevalence of COPD noted in residents who were ≥40 years old and living in Kocaeli, Turkey.
Keywords: COPD, prevalence, questionnaires, cigarette smoking, age, epidemiology
Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important cause of mortality worldwide, with around 2.5 million people dying as a result of COPD every year. It is expected that this disease will be in the top five causes of death by 2020 (1). Depending on the distribution of risk factors, the prevalence of COPD and the morbidity and mortality rates change for each country, as well as for different groups of individuals in countries. Although the prevalence of COPD is mainly driven by the prevalence of cigarette smoking, indoor air pollution and occupational exposure to dusts and gases also make a substantial contribution to the prevalence of COPD. The prevalence, as well as the burden of COPD, is expected to elevate in the coming decades as exposure to risk factors continues, and the population ages (2).
Existing data on the prevalence of COPD show discrepancy due to methodological differences in studies such as differences in diagnostic criteria or survey methods (3, 4). The lowest estimates of prevalence are commonly obtained in surveys depending on a physician’s self-report on the diagnosis of COPD or equivalent conditions. This may reflect the fact that the disease is often under-recognised and under-diagnosed, and that patients with stage I COPD may be asymptomatic, or have symptoms (e.g., chronic cough and sputum) which cannot be primarily recognised as a sign of early COPD by patients themselves or their physicians (5).
COPD was defined as “a preventable and treatable disease with some significant extrapulmonary effects that may contribute to the severity in individual patients” by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) in 2009 (2). Airflow limitation, which is not fully reversible, represents the pulmonary component of COPD. Spirometry performed before and after an inhaled bronchodilator is commonly used to measure reversibility.
Population-based surveys using spirometry have shown that the disease is often under-diagnosed in the US, Japan, Korea, Spain, Sweden, and South America (4, 6–10). There is a large difference among national COPD prevalence estimates depending on self-reported diagnoses (4).
The Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) Initiative was started to develop and use standardised methods for the measurement of worldwide COPD prevalence in adults ≥40 years of age and to assess variations in the prevalence of different countries (11). The Turkey arm of this study was conducted in Adana city (12). The present cross-sectional study conducted in Kocaeli, a heavily industrialised city of Turkey, aimed to determine the COPD prevalence in residents who were ≥40 years old.
Material and Methods
Study area
Kocaeli is one of the heavily industrialised cities in northwestern Anatolia. Kocaeli, which houses 17% of industrial firms, is one of the biggest industrial provinces of Turkey in terms of the heavy metal and chemical industry. Accordingly, most of the residents in Kocaeli are industry labourers and their dependents.
Study population and sampling
The study population included residents who were ≥40 years old and living in Kocaeli. Considering a power of 90%, an alpha value of 5%, and a reported prevalence of COPD of 10% among the population who were ≥40 years old in Turkey, we calculated that we would need 864 subjects. Allowing a 20% margin of safety for non-responders, we decided to include 1000 subjects (13).
A stratified sampling method was used; the sample was distributed according to the population density of each district of Kocaeli. Then, primary health care units that have medical information of all household members living in that particular region were randomly selected. Houses were selected from the registries of these primary health care units using a cluster sampling method, and then household members ≥ 40 years of age were invited to the primary health care units. Home visits were performed for those who did not attend for reasons, such as physical limitation. As all residents consented to participate, the study population exceeded our goal of 1000. A total of 1035 residents (605 men and 430 women) were included in the study.
Data collection
We were able to contact all 1035 individuals in the sample, 17 of whom did not agree to answer the minimum data questionnaire, which provides information on history of cigarette smoking, respiratory symptoms, and co-morbidities. Of the remaining 1018 participants, 72 were excluded because of a lack of usable spirometry data; thus, 946 subjects completed the full protocol.
Approval was obtained from the Kocaeli University Local Ethics Committee (2008/86 IAEK 12/7), and all individuals provided written informed consent. In addition, the Kocaeli Health Directorate granted the study permission.
Study measures
On the basis of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria (14), spirometry was performed by trained and certified technicians, while the participants were in the sitting position. A metered-dose inhaler with a spacer (Volumatic; GlaxoSmithKline; Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) was used for the measurements performed prior to and minimum 15 min after four puffs of salbutamol (100 mcg). Spirometry data were examined, and each spirogram was revised and classified by one of the investigators. Only spirograms fulfilling the acceptability and reproducibility criteria of the ATS were used for analysis (14). The 1996 version of the ATS guideline was used, since the 2006 version was not available when the study was planned. The study was conducted in accordance with the BOLD criteria.
Questionnaire
The basic BOLD questionnaire, which assesses the respiratory symptoms, health status, COPD risk factors, diagnosis, and activity limitation of the patients, was used in the present study (11). Translation of the questionnaire from English into Turkish and its back-translation were performed using standardised methods (11). The questionnaire was applied by trained and certified staff. The minimum data questionnaire was used to collect data on cigarette smoking history, comorbidities and respiratory symptoms for the participants not completing the full spirometry protocol.
Definitions
The GOLD guidelines (2) define irreversible airflow obstruction as “a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio of <0.70”. This refers to GOLD stage I or higher COPD.
In the present study, we also presented data for GOLD stage II or higher COPD (FEV1/FVC <0.70 and FEV1 <80% of predicted). For the primary analysis, the predicted values in percentages were evaluated using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) III reference equations (15).
The term “doctor-diagnosed COPD” was referred to the physician’s self-report on the diagnosis of COPD, emphysema or chronic bronchitis (11).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 11.5. Pearson’s chi-square and chi-square for trend tests were carried out. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
A total of 946 subjects (556 men and 390 women) completed the study and were entered into the analysis. While most of the participants were between 50–59 years of age, considering the overall study sample, the majority of women were in the 40–49-year age group. When considering all age groups, smoking status varied between men and women; among current and former smokers, the number of men was remarkably higher than women. Although the majority of men and women stated that they were never exposed to dust at work, we noted a higher number of men than women exposed to dust at work. While 60.4% of men had education ≤5 years, this rate increases up to 82.6% among women. Table 1 summarises the demographic and clinical features of the study sample.
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample
| Men | Women | Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | ||||
| 40–49 | N | 156 | 139 | 295 |
| % | 28.1 | 35.6 | 31.3 | |
| 50–59 | N | 200 | 137 | 337 |
| % | 36.0 | 35.1 | 35.5 | |
| 60–69 | N | 131 | 82 | 213 |
| % | 23.6 | 21.0 | 22.6 | |
| 70+ | N | 69 | 32 | 101 |
| % | 12.4 | 8.2 | 10.6 | |
|
| ||||
| Smoking status | ||||
| Current smoker | N | 135 | 25 | 160 |
| % | 24.3 | 6.4 | 16.9 | |
| Former smoker | N | 189 | 46 | 235 |
| % | 34.0 | 11.8 | 24.8 | |
| Never smoker | N | 232 | 319 | 551 |
| % | 41.7 | 81.8 | 58.8 | |
|
| ||||
| Pulmonary function | ||||
| FEV1, L | mean±SD | 3.12±0.77 | 2.24±0.51 | 2.77±0.80 |
| % predicted | mean±SD | 77.20±10.09 | 79.70±7.39 | 78.23±9.16 |
| FVC, L | mean±SD | 4.01±0.84 | 2.84±0.61 | 3.52±0.94 |
| FEV1/FVC | mean±SD | 0.78±0.10 | 0.80±0.07 | 0.78±0.09 |
|
| ||||
| Exposure to dust at work | ||||
| Never | N | 379 | 356 | 735 |
| % | 68.2 | 91.3 | 77.7 | |
| ≤10 years | N | 60 | 21 | 81 |
| % | 10.8 | 5.4 | 8.6 | |
| >10 years | N | 117 | 13 | 130 |
| 21.0 | 3.3 | 13.7 | ||
|
| ||||
| Education, years | ||||
| ≤5 years | N | 332 | 319 | 651 |
| % | 60.4 | 82.6 | 69.6 | |
| >5 years | N | 218 | 67 | 285 |
| % | 39.6 | 17.4 | 30.4 | |
FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity
The highest rate of current smokers was noted in the >70 years age group. The rate of former smokers was higher in the 40–49-year age group. We also observed the same trend for men and women alone. The distribution of smoking status with respect to age and gender is presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
Smoking status by age and sex
|
Smoking Status
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Never† | Current† | Former† | Total‡ | ||
| Overall | 40–49 | N | 154 | 34 | 107 | 295 |
| % | 52.2 | 11.5 | 36.3 | 31.2 | ||
| 50–59 | N | 198 | 52 | 87 | 337 | |
| % | 58.8 | 15.4 | 25.8 | 35.6 | ||
| 60–69 | N | 137 | 44 | 32 | 213 | |
| % | 64.3 | 20.7 | 15.0 | 22.5 | ||
| 70+ | N | 62 | 30 | 9 | 101 | |
| % | 61.4 | 29.7 | 8.9 | 10.7 | ||
| Total | N | 551 | 160 | 235 | 946 | |
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
| Never | Current | Former | Total | |||
| Men | 40–49 | N | 52 | 25 | 79 | 156 |
| % | 33.3 | 16.0 | 50.6 | 28.1 | ||
| 50–59 | N | 80 | 42 | 78 | 200 | |
| % | 40.0 | 21.0 | 39.0 | 36.0 | ||
| 60–69 | N | 67 | 40 | 24 | 131 | |
| % | 51.1 | 30.5 | 18.3 | 23.6 | ||
| 70+ | N | 33 | 28 | 8 | 69 | |
| % | 47.8 | 40.6 | 11.6 | 12.4 | ||
| Total | N | 232 | 135 | 189 | 556 | |
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
| Never | Current | Former | Total | |||
| Women | 40–49 | N | 102 | 9 | 28 | 139 |
| % | 73.4 | 6.5 | 20.1 | 35.6 | ||
| 50–59 | N | 118 | 10 | 9 | 137 | |
| % | 86.1 | 7.3 | 6.6 | 35.1 | ||
| 60–69 | N | 70 | 4 | 8 | 82 | |
| % | 85.4 | 4.9 | 9.8 | 21.0 | ||
| 70+ | N | 29 | 2 | 1 | 32 | |
| % | 90.6 | 6.3 | 3.1 | 8.2 | ||
| Total | N | 319 | 25 | 46 | 390 | |
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
Percent of the row
Percent of the column
When considering the overall study sample, the prevalence of COPD that was GOLD stage I or higher was 13.3%. The prevalence of COPD at stage I or higher was 8.7% for women and 16.5% for men (p=0.001). The overall prevalence of COPD at GOLD stage II or higher was 7.1%, 4.1% for women, and 9.2% for men (p=0.003). The rate of patients who were previously diagnosed with COPD was 8.9% overall, 13.8% for women, and 5.4% for men (p<0.001; Table 3).
Table 3.
Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by sex
| Men (556) | Women (390) | Overall (946) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage I or higher | 0.001 | ||||
| Yes | N | 92 | 34 | 126 | |
| % | 16.5 | 8.7 | 13.3 | ||
| No | N | 464 | 356 | 820 | |
| % | 83.5 | 91.3 | 86.7 | ||
|
| |||||
| Stage II or higher | 0.003 | ||||
| Yes | N | 51 | 16 | 67 | |
| % | 9.2 | 4.1 | 7.1 | ||
| No | N | 505 | 374 | 879 | |
| % | 90.8 | 95.9 | 92.9 | ||
|
| |||||
| Doctor-diagnosed | <0.001 | ||||
| Yes | N | 30 | 54 | 84 | |
| % | 5.4 | 13.8 | 8.9 | ||
| No | N | 526 | 336 | 862 | |
| % | 94.6 | 86.2 | 91.1 | ||
The prevalence of stage I or higher COPD was observed to be increased by age for men and women. While the prevalence of COPD at GOLD stage I or higher was 5.8%, 13.5% and 24.4% for men in the age groups of 40–49 years, 50–59 years, and 60–69 years, it was 7.9%, 8.0% and 8.5% for women in the age groups of 40–49 years, 50–59 years, and 60–69 years, respectively. For those who were ≥70 years of age, the prevalence of stage I or higher COPD was 34.8% for men and 15.6% for women (p=0.048; Table 4a). Although the same increasing trend was observed for the prevalence of stage II or higher COPD in men, the prevalence of COPD varied between age groups when considering women with stage II or higher COPD. The highest COPD prevalence was noted in the 40–49 year age group, in women (Table 4b). Of note, the prevalence of stage II or higher COPD was significantly higher in men than in women (p=0.003). On the other hand, the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed COPD varied between men and women, and across age groups. Considering all age groups, the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed COPD was noted to be significantly higher in women as compared to men (p<0.001). The difference between the two genders may be attributed to the fact that women in our country are more likely to visit health care centres when they have symptoms. The prevalence of doctor-diagnosed COPD was 3.5%–10.1% for men, while it was 12.4%–15.9% for women (Table 4c).
Table 4a.
Prevalence of stage I or higher chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by sex and age
| Stage I or higher | Men | Women | Overall | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40–49 | Yes | N | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.465 |
| % | 5.8 | 7.9 | 6.8 | |||
| No | N | 147 | 128 | 275 | ||
| % | 94.2 | 92.1 | 93.2 | |||
| Total | N | 156 | 139 | 295 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 50–59 | Yes | N | 27 | 11 | 38 | 0.119 |
| % | 13.5 | 8.0 | 11.3 | |||
| No | N | 173 | 126 | 299 | ||
| % | 86.5 | 92.0 | 88.7 | |||
| Total | N | 200 | 137 | 337 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 60–69 | Yes | N | 32 | 7 | 39 | 0.004 |
| % | 24.4 | 8.5 | 18.3 | |||
| No | N | 99 | 75 | 174 | ||
| % | 75.6 | 91.5 | 81.7 | |||
| Total | N | 131 | 82 | 213 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 70+ | Yes | N | 24 | 5 | 29 | 0.048 |
| % | 34.8 | 15.6 | 28.7 | |||
| No | N | 45 | 27 | 72 | ||
| % | 65.2 | 84.4 | 71.3 | |||
| Total | N | 69 | 32 | 101 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| Overall | Yes | N | 92 | 34 | 126 | <0.001 |
| % | 16.5 | 8.7 | 13.3 | |||
| No | N | 464 | 356 | 820 | ||
| % | 83.5 | 91.3 | 86.7 | |||
| Total | N | 556 | 390 | 946 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
Table 4b.
Prevalence of stage II or higher chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by sex and age
| Stage II or higher | Men | Women | Overall | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40–49 | Yes | N | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.166 |
| % | 2.6 | 5.8 | 4.1 | |||
| No | N | 152 | 131 | 283 | ||
| % | 97.4 | 94.2 | 95.9 | |||
| Overall | N | 156 | 139 | 295 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 50–59 | Yes | N | 14 | 3 | 17 | 0.048 |
| % | 7.0 | 2.2 | 5.0 | |||
| No | N | 186 | 134 | 320 | ||
| % | 93.0 | 97.8 | 95.0 | |||
| Total | N | 200 | 137 | 337 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 60–69 | Yes | N | 20 | 4 | 24 | 0.020 |
| % | 15.3 | 4.9 | 11.3 | |||
| No | N | 111 | 78 | 189 | ||
| % | 84.7 | 95.1 | 88.7 | |||
| Total | N | 131 | 82 | 213 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 70+ | Yes | N | 13 | 1 | 14 | 0.034 |
| % | 18.8 | 3.1 | 13.9 | |||
| No | N | 56 | 31 | 87 | ||
| % | 81.2 | 96.9 | 86.1 | |||
| Total | N | 69 | 32 | 101 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| Overall | Yes | N | 51 | 16 | 67 | 0.003 |
| % | 9.2 | 4.1 | 7.1 | |||
| No | N | 505 | 374 | 879 | ||
| % | 90.8 | 95.9 | 92.9 | |||
| Total | N | 556 | 390 | 946 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
Table 4c.
Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by sex and age
| Doctor diagnosed | Men | Women | Overall | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40–49 | Yes | N | 8 | 19 | 27 | 0.011 |
| % | 5.1 | 13.7 | 9.2 | |||
| No | N | 148 | 120 | 268 | ||
| % | 94.9 | 86.3 | 90.8 | |||
| Total | N | 156 | 139 | 295 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 50–59 | Yes | N | 7 | 17 | 24 | 0.002 |
| % | 3.5 | 12.4 | 7.1 | |||
| No | N | 193 | 120 | 313 | ||
| % | 96.5 | 87.6 | 92.9 | |||
| Total | N | 200 | 137 | 337 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 60–69 | Yes | N | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.020 |
| % | 6.1 | 15.9 | 9.9 | |||
| No | N | 123 | 69 | 192 | ||
| % | 93.9 | 84.1 | 90.1 | |||
| Total | N | 131 | 82 | 213 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| 70+ | Yes | N | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.512 |
| % | 10.1 | 15.6 | 11.9 | |||
| No | N | 62 | 27 | 89 | ||
| % | 89.9 | 84.4 | 88.1 | |||
| Total | N | 69 | 32 | 101 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
| Men | Women | Overall | p | |||
|
| ||||||
| Overall | Yes | N | 30 | 54 | 84 | <0.001 |
| % | 5.4 | 13.8 | 8.9 | |||
| No | N | 526 | 336 | 862 | ||
| % | 94.6 | 86.2 | 91.1 | |||
| Total | N | 556 | 390 | 946 | ||
| % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
The prevalence of stage I or higher COPD was significantly lower in subjects who were never smokers compared to those who were former/current smokers (10.5% vs. 17.2%, p=0.003). Similarly, the lowest prevalence of COPD at GOLD stage II or higher was noted in the never smoker group as compared to the former/current smoker group (5.3% vs. 9.6%, p=0.010; Table 5).
Table 5.
Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by smoking status
|
Smoking Status
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never smoker (551) | Former/Current smoker (395) | Overall (946) | p | ||
| Stage I or higher | 0.003 | ||||
|
| |||||
| Yes | N | 58 | 68 | 126 | |
| % | 10.5 | 17.2 | 13.3 | ||
| No | N | 493 | 327 | 820 | |
| % | 89.5 | 82.8 | 86.7 | ||
| Stage II or higher | 0.010 | ||||
|
| |||||
| Yes | N | 29 | 38 | 67 | |
| % | 5.3 | 9.6 | 7.1 | ||
| No | N | 522 | 357 | 879 | |
| % | 94.7 | 90.4 | 92.9 | ||
Discussion
COPD is a major public health issue associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in Turkey. Despite the magnitude of the problem, few prevalence studies of COPD have been conducted in Turkey, with a great discrepancy between the results. From this aspect, the current study provides one of the first broad-based data sets, contributing to the understanding of the magnitude of the prevalence of COPD in Turkey.
Aging and increasing exposure to inhaled particles and gases enhances the COPD risk (2, 16). Recently, the estimated rise in the worldwide COPD prevalence has been determined rather by the proposed world population aging than by the proposed variations on the smoking prevalence (17). Accordingly, our data showed that the prevalence of COPD that was stage I or higher increased with age. The BOLD study (12) reported an increasing trend with age in women, who were living in Adana city in Turkey, with the highest prevalence of GOLD stage II or higher COPD in women >70 years of age. Moreover, the projected population prevalence of GOLD stage II or higher COPD for women >70 years of age in Adana (12) was remarkably higher than that noted in the current study (14.3% vs. 3.1%). Although the BOLD study did not show an increasing trend with age in men, the prevalence of GOLD stage II or higher COPD for men >70 years of age in Adana (12) was quite close to the prevalence noted in Kocaeli (18.9% vs. 18.8%).
The findings of the current study also support the current evidence that cigarette smoking is a predominant risk factor for COPD (2, 16). We noted a higher prevalence of COPD that was GOLD stage I or higher in the former/current smoker group compared to the never smoker group (17.2% vs. 10.5%, respectively). In a study performed to determine the effect of passive smoking on the development of COPD disease in southeastern Turkey, COPD was found in 18.1 of the smokers >40 years of age (18). In a study in Italy, it was shown that the relative risk of developing lung cancer was 23.7 times higher in male smokers than non-smokers. On the other hand, the relative risk of developing lung cancer was 5.1 times higher in female smokers than female non-smokers (19). Consistently, the majority of patients who had stage II or higher COPD was in the former/current smoker group (9.6% vs. 5.3%). Similarly, the BOLD study reported the prevalence of COPD that was stage II or higher in Adana to be 5.3% and 5.9% for men and women who had never smoked. In another epidemiologic study conducted in Malatya city in Turkey, the prevalence of COPD in residents >40 years of age was 9.1%, while the prevalence was 18.1% in smoking subjects >40 years of age (20).
Of note, a high prevalence of COPD was also noted in never-smokers (10.5%). Since industrial workers comprise the majority of our study population, and occupational exposure is a well-established risk factor for COPD (21, 22), it is not surprising to note such a high prevalence of COPD even in never-smokers in a heavily industrialised region of Turkey. Nevertheless, it deserves further study to explore whether the high prevalence of COPD in never-smokers is related only to occupational exposure to fumes, chemicals and dusts, or other yet unknown risk factors.
Because women are less likely to smoke than men in most countries, the prevalence of COPD is usually higher in men than women (7, 8, 23, 24). In a study performed in Elazığ-Turkey, the prevalence of cigarette smoking was higher in men (58.7%) than in women (13.1%) (25). Our results were consistent with these findings. The overall prevalence of COPD (GOLD stage I or higher) was 13.3%. The overall prevalence of GOLD stage I or higher COPD for women and men was 8.7% and 16.5%, respectively. Menezes et al. (10) reported that prevalence estimates varied from 7.8% to 19.7% for irreversible airway obstruction in COPD at GOLD stage I or higher in five cities of Latin America. The equivalent estimates for South Africa (26) and Turkey (12) were 23.2% (30.3% in men and 19% in women) and 19.1% (28% in men and 10.3% in women), respectively. A recent study from Salzburg (27) reported a COPD prevalence of 26.1%, which was similar for men (26.6%) and women (25.7%).
In the present study, we found a great difference between the physicians’ self-report on the diagnosis of COPD and the spirometrically determined airflow obstruction. Data collected regarding COPD diagnosis were based on individuals’ self-reports. Although our results are in accordance with those of other studies, it is known that women have reported higher morbidity than males in self-reported studies (28). The prevalence of doctor-diagnosed COPD was 8.9% overall, 13.8% for women, and 5.4% for men. These findings were consistent with the findings of Gunen et al. (20) who reported that the level of participants with a doctor-diagnosed COPD was 7.9% in Malatya. This rate was 5.6% for both men and women in Salzburg, Austria (27).
In conclusion, our data indicated that COPD was very common in Kocaeli. The great majority of COPD patients in Kocaeli had not received an appropriate diagnosis. Despite the high rate of cigarette smoking, which is the critical risk factor for COPD, in Kocaeli, occupational exposure may have a significant role in COPD development because of the high COPD prevalence noted in the non-smoking population.
Acknowledgments
We thank to The BOLD group, especially to Prof. Dr. Sonia Buist.
Footnotes
This study was presented at the 31st National Congress of Turkish Respiratory Society, 17–21 October 2009, İzmir, Turkey.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kocaeli University (2008/86 IAEK 12/7). In addition, permission for the study was granted by the Kocaeli Health Directorate.
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Author contributions: Concept – Z.A., A.I., N.E.; Design – Z.A., N.E., O.H.; Supervision – A.I., O.H.,N.E.; Resource – A.I., O.H., N.E.; Materials – Z.A., A.I., N.E.; Data Collection&/or Processing – Z.A., A.I., N.E.; Analysis&/or Interpretation –N.E., O.H., Z.A.; Literature Search – Z.A., N.E., A.I.; Writing – Z.A., N.E., A.I.; Critical Reviews – N.E., A.I., O.H.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared no financial disclosure.
References
- 1.Murry CJL, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349:1498–504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Available at: http://www.goldcopd.com. Accessed December, 16, 2009).
- 3.Halbert RJ, Natoli JL, Gano A, Badamgarav E, Buist AS, Mannino DM. Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:523–32. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00124605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Halbert RJ, Isonaka S, George D, Iqbal A. Interpreting COPD prevalence estimates: what is the true burden of disease? Chest. 2003;123:1684–92. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.5.1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van den Boom G, van Schayck CP, van Möllen MP, Tirimanna PR, den Otter JJ, van Grunsven PM, et al. Active detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma in the general population. Results and economic consequences of the DIMCA program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1730–8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9709003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mannino DM, Gagnon RC, Petty TL, Lydick E. Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1683–9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fukuchi Y, Nishimura M, Ichinose M, Adachi M, Nagai A, Kuriyama T, et al. COPD in Japan: the Nippon COPD Epidemiology study. Respirology. 2004;9:458–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00637.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim DS, Kim YS, Jung KS, Chang JH, Lim CM, Lee JH, et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Korea: a population-based spirometry survey. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:842–7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200502-259OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pe-a VS, Miravitlles M, Gabriel R, Jimenez-Ruiz CA, Villasante C, Masa JF, et al. Geographic variations in prevalence and underdiagnosis of COPD: results of the IBERPOC multicentre epidemiological study. Chest. 2000;118:981–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Menezes AM, Perez-Padilla R, Jardim JR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in five Latin American cities (the PLATINO study): a prevalence study. Lancet. 2005;366:1875–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67632-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Buist AS, Vollmer WM, Sullivan SD, Weiss KB, Lee TA, Menezes AM, et al. The Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Initiative (BOLD): rationale and design. COPD. 2005;2:277–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kocabas A, Hancioglu A, Turkyilmaz S, Unalan T, Umut S, Cakir B, et al. Prevalence of COPD in Adana, Turkey (BOLD-Turkey Study) Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(suppl):A543. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Jr, Klar J, Lwanga SK. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Chichester: John Wiley; 1990. pp. 10–2. [Google Scholar]
- 14.American Thoracic Society Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1107–36. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.3.7663792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:179–87. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9712108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS, GOLD Scientific Committee Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1256–76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2101039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Feenstra TL, van Genugten ML, Hoogenveen RT, Wouters EF, Rutten-van Mölken MP. The impact of aging and smoking on the future burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a model analysis in the Netherlands. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:590–6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.4.2003167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yıldız T, Topçu F, Çelik Y, Akyıldız L, Ateş G, Durak D. Effect of passive smoking on the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in southeastern Turkey. Turk J Med Sci. 2010;40:349–55. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zuccaro P, Pichini S, Mortali C, Pacifici R, Viegi G, Baldacci S, et al. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine. 2007;2:14–21. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gunen H, Hacievliyagil SS, Yetkin O, Gulbas G, Mutlu LC, Pehlivan E. Prevalence of COPD: first epidemiological study of a large region in Turkey. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19:499–504. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hnizdo E, Sullivan PA, Bang KM, Wagner G. Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and employment by industry and occupation in the US population: a study of data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:738–46. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trupin L, Earnest G, San Pedro M, Balmes JR, Eisner MD, Yelin E, et al. The occupational burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:462–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00094203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boschetto P, Quintavalle S, Miotto D, Lo Cascio N, Zeni E, Mapp CE. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and occupational exposures. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2006;1:11. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-1-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Marco R, Accordini S, Cerveri I, Corsico A, Sunyer J, Neukirch F, et al. An international survey of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in young adults according to GOLD stages. Thorax. 2004;59:120–5. doi: 10.1136/thorax.2003.011163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Açık Y, Sezer E, Sezer H. Frequency and Distrubution of Risk Factors For Coronary Heart Disease in the Adult Population of Rural District of Elazığ, Turkey. Turk J Med. 1999;29:265–72. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jithoo A, Bateman ED, Lombard CJ, White NW, Beyers N, Allison M. Prevalence of COPD in South Africa: results from the BOLD Study. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(suppl):A545. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schirnhofer L, Lamprecht B, Vollmer WM, Allison MJ, Studnicka M, Jensen RL, et al. COPD prevalence in Salzburg, Austria: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) Study. Chest. 2007;131:29–36. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-0365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Crimmins EM, Kim JK, Sole-Auro A. Gender differences in health: results from SHARE, ELSA, and HRS. Eur J Public Health. 2010;21:81–91. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]