Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases logoLink to Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):606–614. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1501

Reproductive Biology and Susceptibility of Florida Culex coronator to Infection with West Nile Virus

Barry W Alto 1,✉, C Roxanne Connelly 1, George F O'Meara 1, Dustin Hickman 1, Nicholas Karr 1
PMCID: PMC4117262  PMID: 25072992

Abstract

Ornithophilic Culex species are considered the primary amplification vectors of West Nile virus (WNV) in bird hosts as well as vectors responsible for epidemic transmission. Culex coronator was first collected from Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Walton, and Washington Counties in Florida in 2005 and has since spread throughout the state. The vector competence of Cx. coronator for WNV, known to be infected in nature, has not been assessed. Without this knowledge, we are unable to assess this species' potential as an enzootic and epidemic vector of WNV in Florida. In the current study, we investigate the reproductive biology and susceptibility to WNV infection, dissemination, and transmission by Cx. coronator. We show that Cx. coronator is capable of delaying oviposition for several weeks after blood feeding and that the number of eggs laid is greater for avian than mammalian hosts. Cx. coronator were highly susceptible to infection (∼80–100%) and dissemination (∼65–85% by 18 days since exposure) with lower rates of transmission (0–17% at 25°C and 28–67% at 28°C), suggesting that it is a competent vector of WNV under some conditions. The proportion of mosquitoes with disseminated infections related to the time since exposure and was higher at 28°C than at 25°C. The rapid and statewide distribution of Cx. coronator throughout Florida poses as a potential public health risk. This baseline knowledge is essential information for mosquito control and public health agencies to assess current and future disease risk to Southeastern United States.

Key Words: : Nonnative species, Reproduction, Adult survival, West Nile virus infection and transmission

Introduction

The range expansion of Culex coronator Dyar and Knab has the potential to alter the dynamics of West Nile virus (WNV) in North America, directly by becoming a novel vector and indirectly by interacting with native vectors. The primary vectors of WNV in Florida are Cx. nigripalpus Theobald and Cx. quinquefasciatus Say (Rutledge et al. 2003, Colton and Nasci 2006). The first collections of Cx. coronator in Florida were from four northwest Florida counties (Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Walton, and Washington) in 2005 (Smith et al. 2006). Since then, Cx. coronator has rapidly expanded its statewide distribution in a north to south direction, similar to the spread of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) a decade earlier (O'Meara et al. 1995). To date Cx. coronator has been collected in 64 of the 67 Florida counties (Connelly and O'Meara, unpublished). Cx. coronator have been found co-occurring in larval habitats with other WNV vector species, including Cx. nigripalpus and Cx. quinquefasciatus in Florida, suggesting species overlap in habitat use (O'Meara, unpublished data). Additionally, we have found larvae in used tires and other types of aquatic habitats in southern and central Florida throughout the year in 2011. For the few counties where Cx. coronator has not been reported, it is likely that the species is there, but has not been detected due in most cases to a lack of primarily active mosquito surveillance programs.

Host-feeding patterns for field-collected blood-fed Cx. coronator in Louisiana suggest that this species is primarily a mammalian blood feeder, although a proportion of blood meals are from birds (Mackay et al. 2010). However, WNV has been found to occur in Cx. coronator in nature (Mackay et al. 2008). This apparent contradiction in feeding pattern and infection with WNV that has an enzootic cycle between birds and mosquitoes may be explained by plasticity in host feeding patterns. For example, blood meal analyses have demonstrated that the proclivity of Cx. tarsalis Coquillett, Cx. pipiens Linnaeus, Cx. nigripalpus, and Cx. erraticus (Dyar and Knab) to feed on mammals and birds varies geographically and seasonally, although these species tend to feed primarily on birds (Edman and Taylor 1968, Kilpatrick et al. 2006a, Kent et al. 2009, Burkett-Cadena et al. 2012). Variability in feeding patterns may be due to genetic makeup, host composition and availability, physiological status or age of the vector, seasonal changes in environmental conditions, variation in host defense behavior, and foraging experience (Niebylski and Meek 1992, Kilpatrick et al. 2006b, Kilpatrick et al. 2007, Lyimo and Ferguson 2009).

The vertebrate source of blood may also influence other aspects of Cx. coronator biology relevant to its role as a potential WNV vector. It has been suggested that nucleated erythrocytes of birds, reptiles, and amphibians provide greater nutrition than anucleated mammal erythrocytes (Bennett 1970, Downe and Archer 1975). Thus, fecundity may be higher in mosquitoes that derive blood meals from these formerly mentioned vertebrates than mammals. Additionally, the blood meal may be used for synthesis of energy reserves, especially among anthropophilic species (Ae. aegypti Linnaeus, Clements 1992, Day et al. 1994, Harrington et al. 2001; Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto Giles, Beier 1996, Gary and Foster 2001) and starved females (Nayar and Sauerman 1975), which may have direct effects on parameters of vectorial capacity (e.g., adult survival).

The vector competence of Cx. coronator for WNV has not been assessed. Without this knowledge, we are unable to assess this species' potential as an enzootic and epidemic vector of WNV in Florida. In the current study, we investigate the reproductive biology, adult female survival, and susceptibility to WNV infection, dissemination, and transmission of Cx. coronator. The rapid and statewide distribution of Cx. coronator throughout Florida poses a potential public health risk. This baseline knowledge is essential information for mosquito control and public health agencies to assess current and future disease risk to areas of the southeastern United States where Cx. coronator is established.

Materials and Methods

Reproductive biology and adult survival

Blood feeding trials were used to determine the influence of the blood meal type on timing of oviposition, fecundity, and survival. An established colony of Cx. coronator originating from Indian River County, Florida, in 2011 was used for all experimental trials. Larvae were reared in 1.0 liters of tap water in plastic photo trays (25 cm width, 30 cm length, 5 cm height; Richard MFG Co. Fernandina Beach, FL) on a diet of liver powder. Approximately 150 larvae were cultured together with food additions being provided at ∼0.2 gram every 3 days. Adult Cx. coronator male and females were held together for 23 days in a cage (0.33 meter) in an outdoor insectary at the Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory and provided with 10% sucrose solution. Females were transferred to 0.5 L cages with mesh screening 2 days prior to feeding trials and provided with water but not sucrose. Females aged for 25 days were then given an opportunity to feed for 1 h on sources of blood via an artificial membrane feeding system (Hemotek, Lancashire, United Kingdom). We deliberately used older mosquitoes because we were concerned whether sufficient numbers of Cx. coronator females would successfully blood feed from an artificial membrane feeding system. Some studies have demonstrated higher host-seeking and feeding rates among older mosquitoes (Davis 1984, Alto et al. 2003). We completed feeding trials using blood sources comprised of five mammals (bovine, guinea pig, horse, pig, and rabbit) and two birds (chicken and turkey). Our rationale for choice of vertebrates was based on making use of more mammals than birds since Cx. coronator frequently feeds on mammals (Mackay et al. 2010). We used a range of mammal hosts (five orders) that were commercially available. Due to limited availability of bird hosts, we used hosts from a single order, Galliformes. Feeding trials were performed in a dark climate-controlled room at 24°C and 66% humidity. Mosquitoes were acclimated for 2 h to the climate-controlled room before the start of feeding trials. After feeding trials, we enumerated unfed and fully engorged adult females.

Following feeding trials, blood-fed Cx. coronator females were housed individually in 0.5 L cages and maintained in the outdoor insectary and provided with 10% sucrose solution, renewed weekly. Mosquitoes were monitored daily for dates of oviposition and death, which were recorded. The dry mass and wing length of Cx. coronator females were measured of blood-fed mosquitoes. Egg rafts were collected within 24 h after oviposition, and the number of eggs was enumerated with the use of light microscopy at 40× magnification. We used regressions to relate adult dry mass to the number of eggs laid and wing length to the number of eggs laid. Differences in blood feeding rates were tested by maximum likelihood (ML) categorical analyses of contingency tables (ML ANOVA, PROC CATMOD; SAS 2002). Significant treatment effects were followed by pairwise contrasts using similar methods correcting for multiple comparisons using the sequential Bonferroni method. A total of 286 adult females were offered blood during the feeding trials. Treatment effects of blood source on timing of oviposition was compared using a nonparametric analysis (PROC LIFETEST; SAS 9.22). Treatment effects of blood source on number of eggs was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant treatment effects were found, we followed up with pairwise comparisons of means, adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Tukey–Kramer method (PROC GLM; SAS 9.22). Treatment effects of blood source on survival were compared using nonparametric survival analysis (PROC LIFETEST; SAS 9.22) followed by log-rank test statistics to compare pairwise estimates of survival adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Sidak method (Sidak 1967).

Infection, dissemination, and transmission of WNV

Nine- to 17-day-old adult Cx. coronator females were provided with WNV-infected chicken blood using an artificial membrane feeding system, as described in the study on reproductive biology and adult survival. To prepare fresh virus for mosquito infection, monolayers of African green monkey kidney (Vero) cells in two T-175-cm2 flasks were inoculated with 200 μL of stock WNV and incubated for 1 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere, after which 24 mL of medium (Medium 199 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin, mycostatin) was added to each flask and incubated for an additional 5 days. Subsequently, medium from the two flasks was combined, and aliquots were frozen at −80°C for later determination of working stock virus by plaque assay. Virus stock that had not been previously frozen was used to prepare the infectious blood. The working stock virus (log10 8.1 plaque-forming units [pfu]/mL) were combined with chicken blood containing Alsever's anticoagulant (Hemostat, Dixon, CA) in a 1:10 ratio for log10 7.1 pfu/mL WNV-infected blood. We used the WN-FL03p2-3 strain of WNV (GenBank accession no. DQ983578) that was isolated from a pool of Cx. nigripalpus from Indian River County, Florida, in 2003. After the feeding trials, fully engorged females were held in 0.5 L cages at 25°C and 28°C, approximating the average temperature observed in geographic regions of Florida historically associated with high WNV transmission (Richards et al. 2007, http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/). Mosquitoes were maintained in temperature-controlled incubators set with a 14:10 h light:dark cycle during the incubation period and provided with 10% sucrose solution and an oviposition substrate.

Females were stored at −80°C after 4, 9, 14, and 18 days postfeeding (time since exposure) and subsequently dissected to remove the legs from the bodies. At the same time, the saliva of a subsample of mosquitoes was used as an approximation of transmission. Saliva was collected from Cx. coronator in capillary tubes with immersion oil using methods by Anderson et al. (2010a). The bodies and legs were homogenized separately in 0.9 mL of BA-1 diluent. A 250-μL sample of mosquito body, legs, and saliva homogenate was used for RNA extraction using the MagNA Pure LC total nucleic acid isolation kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and eluted in 50 μL of buffer according to the manufacturer's protocol. WNV RNA was measured using the Superscript III One-Step qRT-PCR Kit with a Platinum® Taq Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA,) as described previously (Lanciotti et al. 2000, Richards et al. 2007). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed with the LightCycler® 480 system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) using WNV-specific primers and probes (Chisenhall and Mores 2009). The LightCyler program for qRT-PCR was as follows: 48°C for 30 min, 95°C for 2 min, 45 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, and 60°C for 15 s, and 50°C for 30 s. The WNV titer present in samples was expressed in pfu equivalents (pfue)/mL using a standard curve method that compared cDNA synthesis for a range of serial dilutions of WNV in parallel with plaque assays using the same dilutions of virus (Richards et al. 2007).

Assays of mosquito bodies, legs, and saliva determined infection, dissemination, and transmission, respectively. Rates were calculated as the number of infected bodies, legs, and saliva from the total tested, expressed as a percent. Tests of infection, dissemination, and transmission enabled us to determine the vector competence of Cx. coronator for WNV and barriers to infection (e.g., midgut infection and escape barriers, salivary gland barrier [infection+escape]).

Temperature-related and temporal patterns in infection and dissemination were tested using separate ML categorical analyses of contingency tables (PROC CATMOD; SAS 2002) based on counts of individual mosquitoes being categorized as 1 or 0 for the presence or absence of virus, respectively. A similar approach was used to estimate transmission, except that the temporal patterns only included 9, 14, and 18 days postfeeding. The infection experiment with Cx. coronator and WNV was not repeated multiple times. We used individual mosquitoes as our replicates and analyzed infection responses by analysis of frequency distribution. ANOVA was used to test for differences in virus titers in the individual mosquito bodies for each temperature treatment and time since exposure. To account for the assumption of normality, virus titer was log10 transformed. Nine to 73 mosquitoes were individually analyzed at each time point for each temperature for a total of eight time point–temperature pairs (mean±standard deviation [SD] number of mosquitoes tested; 25±20). Significant effects were followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons among treatment least-squares means for pairwise comparisons.

Results

Reproductive biology and adult survival

Cx. coronator had significantly higher feeding rates on mammal (median±SD percent fed of total offered blood; horse, 66.2±21.6; rabbit, 30.8±25.4; bovine, 38.1±13.9; guinea pig, 47.2±13.6; porcine, 50.0±17.3) than avian hosts (median±SD, chicken, 23.3±20.8; turkey, 35.7±5.0) using an artificial membrane feeding system (Hemotek®) (χ2=6.9, degrees of freedom [df ]=1, p=0.0083). Pairwise comparisons of host blood feeding rates showed that Cx. coronator had significantly lower blood feeding rates on chicken than horse blood (χ2=10.2, df=1, p=0.0014). All remaining pairwise comparisons were not significantly different from one another. No significant differences were observed in the timing of oviposition from Cx. coronator fed on mammalian and avian blood sources (χ2=10.3, df=6, p=0.1097; Fig. 1A). Significantly greater numbers of eggs were laid by female adults fed on avian than on mammalian blood (t=4.9, df=106, p<0.0001). Analyzing each blood type separately, ANOVA showed a significant effect of blood source on number of eggs laid (F6, 101=5.89, p<0.0001). Significantly more eggs were laid by Cx. coronator fed on turkey blood than all other sources of blood, except rabbit and chicken (Fig. 1B). Regression analyses showed no significant relationship between Cx. coronator mass (mg) and number of eggs laid (r2=0.03, n=40, p=0.96; Fig. 2A) or wing length (mm) and number of eggs laid (r2=0.02, n=43, p=0.87; Fig. 2B); the latter was log10-transformed to meet the assumption of normality. Nonparametric survival analyses showed significantly greater survival of female adults fed on avian than mammalian blood (χ2=9.6, df=1, p=0.0019). Comparison of survival over time showed significantly steeper declines for Cx. coronator previously fed on bovine blood compared to chicken (χ2=9.3, df=1, p=0.04) and turkey blood (χ2=18.0, df=1, p=0.0005) (Fig. 3). Marginally nonsignificant steeper declines in survival were observed for Cx. coronator fed on rabbit compared to turkey blood (χ2=8.7, df=1, p=0.06; Fig. 3).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Open in a new tab

Differences in timing of oviposition (A) and number of eggs laid (B) after feeding on mammal and avian blood. Symbols associated with different letters show significant differences between blood sources. No error bars are shown for timing of oviposition for Cx. coronator fed on chickens because oviposition occurred on the same day.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Open in a new tab

Relationships of dry mass with number of eggs laid (A) and wing length and number of eggs laid (B) in Cx. coronator fed on mammalian and avian blood.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Open in a new tab

Survival of adult female Cx. coronator (n=254) fed on mammalian and avian blood (left y axis). Mean temperature in Indian River County, Florida, during the experiment (right y axis).

Infection, dissemination, and transmission of WNV

Virus titers of freshly fed mosquitoes were 6.8±0.1 and 6.7±0.1 log10 pfue of WNV/mL for Cx. coronator at 25°C and 28°C, respectively. WNV infected approximately 80–100% of Cx. coronator with no significant effect of temperature, time since exposure, or their interaction (all χ2<2.2, p>0.10; Fig. 4A). Temperature (χ2=7.92, df=1, p=0.0049) and time since exposure (χ2=36.54, df=3, p<0.0001) significantly affected disseminated infections. The interaction of treatment factors on disseminated infections was marginally nonsignficant (χ2=7.63, df=3, p=0.0542). There were significantly more Cx. coronator with disseminated infections at 28°C than 25°C (Fig. 4B). On days 9, 14, and 18, there were significantly more Cx. coronator with disseminated infections than on day 4 (all χ2>12.8, p≤0.0003; Fig. 4B). Similarly on day 18, there were significantly more disseminated infections than on days 9 and 14 (all χ2>7.4, p≤0.0065; Fig. 4B). Temperature (χ2=3.82, df=1, p=0.0508) significantly affected transmission, but not time since exposure (χ2=0.74, df=1, p=0.6896) or their interaction (χ2=2.67, df=1, p=0.2632). Significantly more Cx. coronator transmitted WNV at 28°C than 25°C (Fig. 4C).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Open in a new tab

West Nile virus infection (A), dissemination (B), and transmission (C) maintained at 25°C and 28°C. Numbers above the bars show the total number of Cx. coronator females assayed for West Nile virus RNA.

WNV titer

Body titer varied significantly as a function of temperature (F1, 189=46.89, p<0.0001), days since exposure (F3, 189=51.62, p<0.0001), and their interaction (F3, 189=4.36, p=0.0054). Body titer was significantly greater for Cx. coronator at 28°C than 25°C (Fig. 5). Body titer was significantly higher at later times since exposure (Fig. 5). For the interaction, body titer was significantly higher at 14 and 18 days than at 4 and 9 days since exposure at 25°C (Fig. 5). Body titer was significantly higher at 9, 14, and 18 days than at 4 days since exposure at 28°C (Fig.5).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Open in a new tab

Body titer (±standard error [SE]) log10 plaque-forming units equivalents/mL for Cx. coronator infected with West Nile virus. Body titers include individuals with nondisseminated and disseminated infections. Lowercase and uppercase letters show significant differences between body titer since time of exposure for Cx. coronator at 25°C and 28°C, respectively.

Discussion

Host-feeding patterns indicate that Cx. coronator is primarily a mammalian blood feeder (Mackay et al. 2010). We show under laboratory conditions that the source of the blood meal does not alter the timing of oviposition, but it does influence the number of eggs laid and the survival of adults. The number of eggs laid tended to be greater for avian than mammalian hosts, and survival was enhanced after having fed on avian-derived blood compared to some but not all mammal blood sources, suggesting greater nutrition (or lower energetic cost of digestion) and corresponding reproductive fitness for feeding on avian hosts over some mammals. Although survival and fecundity of Cx. coronator appears to be higher when fed on avian blood, there seems to be a trade-off, because the feeding success on avian hosts was lower compared to mammalian hosts. Differences in avian and mammal blood have been demonstrated for other mosquito species. For example, Cx. tarsalis digests chicken blood more rapidly than rodent blood (Downe and Archer 1975). Birds tend to be the most productive hosts in terms of fecundity for several Culex species (Cx. quinquefasciatus, Richards et al. 2010, Hamer et al. 2008; Cx. nigripalpus, Gomes et al. 2003; Cx. salinarius, Cupp and Stokes, 1976), although not always different from the mammal hosts surveyed (reviewed in Lyimo and Ferguson 2009). Similar results have been observed for Ae. aegypti (Bennett 1970). It has been hypothesized that nucleated erythrocytes of birds provide greater nutrition than anucleated mammal erythrocytes (Bennett 1970, Downe and Archer 1975), although there are exceptions, e.g., Ae. albopictus Skuse blood fed on guinea pig and human hosts had higher fecundity than those fed on chickens (Xue et al. 2009). Differences in the observed outcomes of studies suggest that both nutrition and evolutionary history with the host influence mosquito fecundity (Lyimo and Ferguson 2009, Takken and Verhulst 2012).

Although the source of blood did not alter the timing of oviposition, we observed that Cx. coronator had the capability to lay eggs several weeks after blood feeding. Plasticity in the timing of oviposition may influence mosquito reproductive cycles and arbovirus transmission. During periods of drought, the availability of suitable oviposition habitats may be limited and so Cx. coronator may delay oviposition. Following rainfall, Cx. coronator will lay eggs and enter a host-seeking behavior. Extended periods of drought may enhance the potential of Cx. coronator as a WNV transmitter because the rate of dissemination was related to time since exposure. As a consequence, risk of WNV transmission by Cx. coronator may be highest after rainfall events that follow a warm drought period. For instance, heavy rainfalls synchronize Cx. nigripalpus blood feeding (Day and Curtis 1989) and oviposition (Day et al. 1990) and also are associated with epizootic and epidemic transmission of WNV (Shaman et al. 2005) and St. Louis encephalitis virus (Shaman et al. 2002, Day and Curtis 1999). The mechanism for amplification and epizootic transmission of these arboviruses seems to be due to drought-induced congregation of birds and mosquitoes in refuges allowing for amplification. Rainfalls subsequently increase availability of oviposition habitats and arbovirus-infected Cx. nigripalpus and birds disperse, allowing for the possibility of epidemic transmission.

The lack of a significant relationship between body size and the number of eggs laid deviates from the well-established notion that larger mosquitoes are more fecund. This result was surprising given that the range in sizes between mosquitoes in our study was similar to those in other mosquito species (Ae. albopictus, Lounibos et al. 2002; Cx. quinquefasciatus, McCann et al. 2009). However, we did not dissect mosquitoes to examine unlaid (stage five) eggs, which may obscure relationships between mosquito size and fecundity. Another possibility is that, unlike several other studies, we did not deliberately manipulate the nutrient environment of the larvae and this may have resulted in a more pronounced size–fecundity relationship. Alternatively, the relationship between size and fecundity may vary with mosquito age. A comparison of Cx. quinquefasciatus categorized by age demonstrated that fecundity positively related to size of females aged 5–13 days, whereas no relationship between size and fecundity was found for females aged 17–25 days (McCann et al. 2009). This study demonstrated a decline in fecundity with age over a span of 25 days. These authors suggested that larger, but not smaller, mosquitoes may invest fewer lipids into their yolk mass with increasing gonotrophic age, as observed with Ae. aegypti (Briegel et al. 2002), and this may account for age-dependency when body size is used to predict fecundity. This conclusion is supported in the current study because we used mosquitoes within this age range and we did not observe a relationship between size and fecundity. Along the same lines, because we did not include mosquito age as a treatment, we cannot determine whether these mosquitoes respond similarly to younger mosquitoes for the responses that were measured.

Viral titers used in the WNV infection study, 6.7–6.8 log10 pfue WNV/mL, were comparable to viremia profiles for several orders of avian hosts (Komar et al. 2003, Guerrero-Sánchez et al. 2011). Cx. coronator were highly susceptible to infection with WNV at both 25°C and 28°C, with similar rates of infection as observed for Florida Cx. quinquefasciatus (Anderson et al. 2010b) and Cx. nigripalpus (Richards et al. 2011) at 25°C and 28°C using the same WNV strain (WN-FL03p2-3). Increases in WNV titer with time since exposure indicated maximum virus population size in Cx. coronator by day 14 for 25°C and by day 9 for 28°C. These observations are comparable to those body titers observed in Cx. nigripalpus held at 28°C and tested at 6 and 12 days since exposure to WNV (Richards et al. 2011) and Cx. quinquefasciatus held at 25°C and 28°C and tested between 4 and 21 days since exposure to WNV (Anderson et al. 2010b, Richards et al. 2012). However, observed virus titers in the bodies of mosquitoes are somewhat higher than those observed in other studies (Reisen et al. 2006, Styer et al. 2007a, Ciota et al. 2011), which may be, in part, attributable to differences in testing methodologies (tissue culture versus qRT-PCR).

West Nile virus escape from the midgut occurred only at very low rates (∼4%) at or before 4 days since exposure. Between 4 and 9 days since exposure, disseminated infections increased by ∼10-fold for Cx. coronator at 25°C and 28°C. Similar rates of dissemination were observed for Cx. quinquefasciatus fed 7.0 logs pfue WNV/mL (strain WN-FL03p2-3) at 25°C and 28°C (Anderson et al. 2010b). In contrast, rates of dissemination for Cx. coronator were lower than those observed for Cx. nigripalpus at 28°C (Richards et al. 2011). Percent of disseminated infections related to time since exposure with peak dissemination reached by day 14 for Cx. coronator at 28°C and at day 18 for mosquitoes at 25°C, an indication of a time-sensitive midgut escape barrier (Kramer et al. 1981, Lutomiah et al. 2011). The percent of Cx. coronator infected and with disseminated infections tended to be equal to or higher than those estimates for known WNV vectors Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans Theobald held at comparable environmental conditions fed similar amounts of WNV (Turell et al. 2001, Ebel et al. 2005). Rates of transmission were lower than those observed for dissemination, an indication of a salivary gland infection and/or escape barrier for Cx. coronator. Additionally, studies have indicated that transmission rates detected with the hanging blood drop or capillary tube methods are lower than those detected when feeding on an actual susceptible animal (Akhter et al. 1982, Turell et al. 2006, Styer et al. 2007b). Observed transmission rates were similar or higher than those observed for known vectors Cx. pipiens (Ebel et al. 2005), Cx. restuans (Ebel et al. 2005), Cx. nigripalpus (Richards et al. 2011), and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Richards et al. 2012) under similar environmental conditions, and in some cases, using the same WNV isolate (e.g., Richards et al. 2011, 2012). Increases in temperature enhance the competence of Cx. coronator for WNV by shortening the time for viral dissemination and enhancing transmission. Although the mechanism(s) responsible for enhanced competence require further investigation, higher virus replication at warmer conditions may, in part, be responsible (Watts et al. 1987, Dohm et al. 2002) and is consistent with our observations on body titer.

Although it is not known whether Cx. coronator plays a role in the natural transmission of WNV in Florida, in some instances there may be a delay of years after a mosquito enters a new geographic region before it becomes involved in the transmission cycle (e.g., Ae. albopictus and La Crosse encephalitis virus; Gerhardt et al. 2001). Similar concerns have been suggested for newly established Ae. japonicus (Theobald) in North America (Sardelis et al. 2002). The results of this study combined with our knowledge of host-feeding patterns indicate that Cx. coronator could serve as a bridge vector for WNV between the enzootic avian cycle and mammals.

Conclusions

This is the first study evaluating the susceptibility to WNV infection and transmission by Cx. coronator. These data support the notion that the vector competence of Cx. coronator for WNV is similar to, and in some instances exceeds, those rates observed for other known vectors of WNV. The rapid spread of Cx. coronator in Florida and other parts of the southeastern United States poses a potential public health risk.

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Richards for useful discussions in methodology used in the infection study, D. Bettinardi for assistance with assaying freshly blood-fed mosquitoes for WNV RNA, D. DeLong for assistance with assaying mosquitoes for infection, and R. Gotzmann for help on studies examining reproductive biology of Cx. coronator. This study is supported by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 2011 grant number 00098442.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  1. Akhter R, Hayes CG, Baqar S, Reisen WK. West Nile virus in Pakistan. III. Comparative vector capability of Culex tritaeniorhynchus and eight other species of mosquitoes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1982; 76:449–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alto BW, Lounibos LP, Juliano SA. Age-dependent bloodfeeding of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus on artificial and living hosts. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2003; 19:347–352 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson SL, Richards SL, Smartt CT. A simple method for determining arbovirus transmission in mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2010a; 26:108–111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson SL, Richards SL, Tabachnick WJ, Smartt CT. Effects of West Nile virus dose and extrinsic incubation temperature on temporal progression of vector competence in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2010b; 26:103–107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beier JC. Frequent blood-feeding and restrictive sugar-feeding behavior enhance the malaria vector potential of Anopheles gambiae s.l. and An. funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Western Kenya. J Med Entomol 1996; 33:613–618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett GF. The influence of the blood meal type on the fecundity of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Canad J Zool 1970; 48:539–543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Briegel H, Hefti M, DiMarco E. Lipid metabolism during sequential gonotrophic cycles in large and small female Aedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol 2002; 48: 547–554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burkett-Cadena ND, Hassan HK, Eubanks MD, Cupp EW, et al. Winter severity predicts the timing of host shifts in the mosquito Culex erraticus. Biol Lett 2012; doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chisenhall DM, Mores CN. Diversification of West Nile virus in a subtropical region. Virol J 2009; 6:106–115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ciota AT, Styer LM, Meola MA, Kramer LD. The costs of infection and resistance as determinants of West Nile virus susceptibility in Culex mosquitoes. BMC Ecology 2011; 11:23–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clements AN. The Biology of Mosquitoes, vol.1 Development, Nutrition and Reproduction. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1992 [Google Scholar]
  12. Colton L, Nasci RS. Quantification of West Nile virus in the saliva of Culex species collected from the southern United States. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2006; 22:57–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Connelly CR, O'Meara GF. (unpublished). Expanded distribution of Culex coronator in Florida. http://mosquito.ifas.ufl.edu/Documents/Culex_coronator_map.pdf Accessed July31, 2013
  14. Cupp EW, Stokes GM. Feeding patterns of Culex salinarius Coquillett in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. Mosq News 1976; 36:332–335 [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis EE. Development of lactic acid-receptor sensitivity and host-seeking behaviour in newly emerged female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol 1984; 30:211–215 [Google Scholar]
  16. Day JF, Curtis GA. Influence of rainfall on Culex nigripalpus (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding behavior in Indian River County, Florida. Ann Entomol Soc Am 1989; 82:32–37 [Google Scholar]
  17. Day JF, Curtis GA. Blood feeding and oviposition by Culex nigripalpus (Diptera: Culicidae) before, during, and after a widespread St. Louis encephalitis virus epidemic in Florida. J Med Entomol 1999; 36:176–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Day JF, Curtis GA, Edman JD. Rainfall-directed oviposition behavior of Culex nigripalpus (Diptera: Culicidae) and its influence on St. Louis encephalitis virus transmission in Indian River County, Florida. J Med Entomol 1990; 27:43–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Day JF, Edman JD, Scott TW. Reproductive fitness and survivorship of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) maintained on blood, with field observations from Thailand. J Med Entomol 1994; 31: 611–617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dohm DJ, O'Guinn ML, Turell MJ. Effect of environmental temperature on the ability of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit West Nile virus. J Med Entomol 2002; 39:221–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Downe AER, Archer JA. Effects of different blood-meal sources on digestion and egg production in Culex tarsalis Coq. (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 1975; 12:431–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ebel GD, Rochlin I, Longacker J, Kramer LD. Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae) relative abundance and vector competence for West Nile virus. J Med Entomol 2005; 42:838–843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edman JD, Taylor DJ. Culex nigripalpus: Seasonal shift in the bird-mammal feeding ratio in a mosquito vector of human encephalitis. Science 1968; 161:67–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gary RE, Foster WA. Effects of available sugar on the reproductive fitness and vectorial capacity of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 2001; 38: 22–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gerhardt RR, Gottfried KL, Apperson CS, Davis BS, et al. The first isolation of La Crosse virus from naturally infected Aedes albopictus. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:807–811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gomes AC, Silva NN, Marques GR, Brito M. Host-feeding patterns of potential human disease vectors in the Paraiba Valley region, State of Säo Paulo, Brazil. J Vector Ecol 2003; 28:74–78 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guerrero-Sánchez S, Cuevas-Romero S, Nemeth NM, Teresa M, et al. West Nile virus infection of birds, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17:2245–2251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamer GL, Kitron UD, Brawn JD, Loss SR, et al. Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae): A bridge vector of West Nile virus to humans. J Med Entomol 2008; 45:125–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Harrington LC, Edman JD, Scott TW. Why do female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) feed preferentially and frequently on human blood? J Med Entomol 2001; 38: 411–422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kent R, Juliusson L, Weissmann M, Evans S, et al. Seasonal blood-feeding behavior of Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Weld County, Colorado, 2007. J Med Entomol 2009; 46:380–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kilpatrick AM, Kramer LD, Jones MJ, Marra PP, et al. West Nile virus epidemics in North America are driven by shifts in mosquito feeding behavior. PLoS Biol 2006a; 4:e82. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kilpatrick AM, Daszak P, Jones MJ, Marra PP, et al. Host heterogeneity dominates West Nile virus transmission. Proc Roy Soc B 2006b; 273:2327–2333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kilpatrick AM, Kramer LD, Jones MJ, Marra PP, et al. Genetic influences on mosquitoes feeding behavior and the emergence of zoonotic pathogens. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007; 77:667–671 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Komar N, Langevin S, Hinten S, Memeth N, et al. Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York 1999 strain of West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9:311–321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kramer LD, Hardy JL, Presser SB, Houk EJ. Dissemination barriers for western equine encephalomyelitis virus in Culex tarsalis infected after ingestion of low viral doses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1981; 30:190–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lanciotti R, Kerst A, Nasci R, Godsey M., et al. Rapid detection of West Nile virus from human clinical specimens, field-collected mosquitoes, and avian samples by a TaqMan reverse transcriptase-PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:4066–4077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lounibos LP, Suarez S, Menendez Z, Nishimura N, Escher RL, O'Connell SM, Rey JR. Does temperature affect the outcome of larval competition between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus? J Vector Ecol 2002; 27: 86–95 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lutomiah JL, Koka H, Mutisya J, Yalwala S, et al. Ability of selected Kenyan mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) species to transmit West Nile virus under laboratory conditions. J Med Entomol 2011; 48:1197–1201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyimo IN, Ferguson HM. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of host species choice in mosquito vectors. Trends Parasitol 2009; 25:189–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mackay AJ, Roy A, Yates MM, Foil LD. West Nile virus detection in mosquitoes in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana from November, 2002, to October, 2004. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2008; 24:28–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mackay AJ, Kramer WL, Meece JK, Brumfield RT, et al. Host feeding patterns of Culex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. J Med Entomol 2010; 47:238–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. McCann S, Day JF, Allan S, Lord CC. Age modifies the effect of body size on fecundity in Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Ecol 2009; 34:174–181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nayar JK, Sauerman DM., Jr The effects of nutrition on survival and fecundity in Florida Mosquitoes. Part 2. Utilization of a blood meal for survival. J Med Entomol 1975; 12: 99–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Niebylski M, Meek C. Blood-feeding of Culex mosquitoes in an urban environment. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1992; 8:173–177 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. O'Meara GF, Evans LF, Jr, Gettman AD, Cuda JP. Spread of Aedes albopictus and decline of Ae. aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Florida. J Med Entomol 1995; 32:554–562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Reisen WK, Fang Y, Martinez VM. Effects of temperature on the transmission of West Nile virus by Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 2006; 43:309–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Richards SL, Mores CN, Lord CC, Tabachnick WJ. Impact of extrinsic incubation temperature and virus exposure on vector competence of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) for West Nile virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2007; 7:629–636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Richards SL, Anderson SL, Yost SA. Effects of blood meal source on the reproduction of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Ecol 2010; 37:1–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Richards SL, Anderson SL, Lord CC, Tabachnick WJ. Impact of West Nile virus dose and incubation period on vector competence of Culex nigripalpus (Diptera: Culicidae). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2011; 11:1487–1491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Richards SL, Anderson SL, Lord CC, Smartt CT, et al. Relationships between infection, dissemination, and transmission of West Nile virus RNA in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 2012; 49:132–142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rutledge CR, Day JF, Lord CC, Stark LM, et al. West Nile virus infection rates in Culex nigripalpus (Diptera: Culicidae) do not reflect transmission rates in Florida. J Med Entomol 2003; 40:253–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sardelis MR, Turell MJ, Andre RG. Laboratory transmission of La Crosse virus by Ochlerotatus j. japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 2002; 39:635–639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shaman J, Day JF, Stieblitz M. Drought-induced amplification of Saint Louis encephalitis virus, Florida. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:575–580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shaman J, Day JF, Stieblitz M. Drought-induced amplification and epidemic transmission of West Nile virus in Southern Florida. J Med Entomol 2005; 42:134–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sidak Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1967; 62:626–633 [Google Scholar]
  56. Smith JP, Walsh JD, Cope EH, Tennant RA Jr., et al. Culex coronator Dyar and Knab: A new Florida species record. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2006; 22:330–332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Styer LM, Meola MA, Kramer LD. West Nile virus infection decreases fecundity of Culex tarsalis females. J Med Entomol 2007a; 44:1074–1085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Styer LM, Kent KA, Albright RG, Bennett CJ, Kramer LD, Bernard KA. Mosquitoes inoculate high doses of West Nile virus as they probe and feed on live hosts. PLoS Path 2007b; 3:e132. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Takken W, Verhulst NO. Host preferences of blood-feeding mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol 2012; 58:433–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Turell MJ, O'Guinn ML, Dohm DJ, Jones JW. Vector competence of North American mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) for West Nile virus. J Med Entomol 2001; 38:130–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Turell MJ, Mores CN, Dohm DJ, Lee W-J, Kim H-C, Klein TA. Laboratory transmission of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile, and Getah viruses by mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) collected near Camp Greaves, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea, 2003. J Med Entomol 2006; 43:1076–1081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Watts DM, Burke DS, Harrison BA, Whitmire RE, Nisalak A. Effect of temperature on the vector efficiency of Aedes aegypti for dengue 2 virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1987; 36:143–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Xue R-D, Barnard D, Ali A. Influence of multiple blood meals on gonotrophic dissociation and fecundity in Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2009; 25:504–507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES