Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2014 Jul 31;2(4):e00727-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00727-14

Draft Genome Sequence of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii Strain CFBP 6369

L Gagnevin a,, S Bolot b,c,b,c, J L Gordon d, O Pruvost a, C Vernière a, I Robène a, M Arlat b,c,e,b,c,e,b,c,e, L D Noël b,c,b,c, S Carrère b,c,b,c, M-A Jacques f,g,h,f,g,h,f,g,h, R Koebnik i
PMCID: PMC4118059  PMID: 25081256

Abstract

We report here the draft genome sequence of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii strain CFBP 6369, the causal agent of bacterial blight of onion. The draft genome has a size of 5,425,942 bp and a G+C content of 64.4%.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii is the causal agent of bacterial blight of onion (Allium cepa) and other Allium species (1, 2). First reported in 1978 (3), the disease has been emerging since the 1990s. It is included in the A1 list of pathogens of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO). Lesions on leaves infected with this pathogen begin as small water-soaked spots that enlarge into chlorotic lesions and collapse at the point of initial infection, causing a reduction in bulb size. The bacterium can contaminate seeds, which are a major source of inoculum (4, 5), together with diseased plants and plant debris, epiphytically polluted Allium or weed species, and irrigation water. Seed trade is responsible for long-distance dissemination (6, 7). Yield losses can reach 50% and are favored by high temperature and humidity. The control of the disease can be partially achieved through integrated pest management (8, 9) and should improve with better knowledge of the bacterium and its interaction with its host species. X. axonopodis pv. allii strains are more genetically diversified and less host specialized than is usually expected for a Xanthomonas pathovar. They belong to the genetically diverse group 9.2 of X. axonopodis (1) and are probably polyphyletic (10). Strain CFBP 6369, isolated in 1996 in Réunion Island, France, was chosen because its genetic, physiologic, and pathogenic characteristics are representative of the pathovar (1).

Strain CFBP 6369 was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (GATC Biotech, Germany). The shotgun sequencing yielded 35,091,791 read pairs (21,359,123 100-bp paired-end reads with an insert size of ca. 250 bp, and 13,732,668 50-bp mate-pair reads with an insert size of ca. 3 kb). A combination of Velvet (11), SOAPdenovo, and SOAPGapCloser (12) yielded 13 contigs >500 bp (N50, 1,415,587 bp), with the largest contig being 1,460,767 bp, for a total assembly size of 5,425,942 bp. The G+C content was 64.4%. Genomic contigs were annotated using the EuGene-P annotation pipeline to identify RNAs and protein-coding genes (13). The draft genome of strain CFBP 6369 was predicted to contain 4,963 coding sequences (CDSs).

The genome of strain CFBP 6369 has an average nucleotide identity (ANI) close to 99% (14) with other xanthomonads in the 9.2 group, while it shares <95% ANI with strains from groups 9.5 and 9.6. X. axonopodis pv. allii has a gene content similar to those of other xanthomonads, with a large representation of two-component system sensor and regulatory proteins, methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters, TonB-dependent receptors, and transcriptional regulators. It contains a complete set of genes coding for the hypersensitive response and pathogenicity (HRP) type III secretion system and a minimal repertoire of 22 putative type III effector genes: avrBs2, xopA, xopAD, xopAE, xopAJ, xopAK, xopC2, xopE1, xopF1, xopF2, xopI, xopJ, xopK, xopL, xopN, xopP, xopQ, xopR, xopV, xopX, xopZ1, and xopAP. This resource will be instrumental for dissecting the genetic and molecular basis of X. axonopodis pv. allii pathogenicity on Alliaceae, investigating the natural genomic diversity of this emerging plant pathogen, and improving diagnostics.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. JOJQ00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, JOJQ01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (no. ANR-2010-GENM-013, ANR-10-LBX-41, and ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02). Funding was also received from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 263958 (RUN-Emerge project).

Footnotes

Citation Gagnevin L, Bolot S, Gordon JL, Pruvost O, Vernière C, Robène I, Arlat M, Noël LD, Carrière S, Jacques M-A, Koebnik R. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii strain CFBP 6369. Genome Announc. 2(4):e00727-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00727-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Roumagnac P, Gagnevin L, Gardan L, Sutra L, Manceau C, Dickstein ER, Jones JB, Rott P, Pruvost O. 2004. Polyphasic characterization of xanthomonads isolated from onion, garlic and Welsh onion (Allium spp.) and their relatedness to different Xanthomonas species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:15–24. 10.1099/ijs.0.02714-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gent DH, Schwartz HF, Ishimaru CA, Louws FJ, Cramer RA, Lawrence CB. 2004. Polyphasic characterization of Xanthomonas strains from onion. Phytopathology 94:184–195. 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.2.184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Alvarez AM, Buddenhagen IW, Buddenhagen ES, Domen HY. 1978. Bacterial blight of onion, a new disease caused by Xanthomonas sp. Phytopathology 68:1132–1136. 10.1094/Phyto-68-1132 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Picard Y, Roumagnac P, Legrand D, Humeau L, Robène-Soustrade I, Chiroleu F, Gagnevin L, Pruvost O. 2008. Polyphasic characterization of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii associated with outbreaks of bacterial blight on three Allium species in the Mascarene archipelago. Phytopathology 98:919–925. 10.1094/PHYTO-98-8-0919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Roumagnac P, Gagnevin L, Pruvost O. 2000. Detection of Xanthomonas sp., the causal agent of onion bacterial blight, in onion seeds using a newly developed semi-selective isolation medium. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 106:867–877. 10.1023/A:1008743120242 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gent DH, Lang JM, Bartolo ME, Schwartz HR. 2005. Inoculum sources and survival of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii in Colorado. Plant Dis. 89:507–514. 10.1094/PD-89-0507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gent DH, Lang JM, Schwartz HF. 2005. Epiphytic survival of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii and X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli on leguminous hosts and onion. Plant Dis. 89:558–564. 10.1094/PD-89-0558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lang JM, Gent DH, Schwartz HF. 2007. Management of Xanthomonas leaf blight of onion with bacteriophages and a plant activator. Plant Dis. 91:871–878. 10.1094/PDIS-91-7-0871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Robène-Soustrade I, Legrand D, Gagnevin L, Chiroleu F, Laurent A, Pruvost O. 2010. Multiplex nested PCR for detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii from onion seeds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:2697–2703. 10.1128/AEM.02697-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gent DH, Al-Saadi A, Gabriel DW, Louws FJ, Ishimaru CA, Schwartz HF. 2005. Pathogenic and genetic relatedness among Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii and other pathovars of X. axonopodis. Phytopathology 95:918–925. 10.1094/PHYTO-95-0918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829. 10.1101/gr.074492.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu SM, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam TW, Wang J. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience. 1:18. 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sallet E, Roux B, Sauviac L, Jardinaud MF, Carrère S, Faraut T, de Carvalho-Niebel F, Gouzy J, Gamas P, Capela D, Bruand C, Schiex T. 2013. Next-generation annotation of prokaryotic genomes with EuGene-P: application to Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011. DNA Res. 20:339–354. 10.1093/dnares/dst014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:81–91. 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES