Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8488–8492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8488

Contrasting roles for Myc and Mad proteins in cellular growth and differentiation.

L Chin 1, N Schreiber-Agus 1, I Pellicer 1, K Chen 1, H W Lee 1, M Dudast 1, C Cordon-Cardo 1, R A DePinho 1
PMCID: PMC41182  PMID: 7667316

Abstract

The positive effects of Myc on cellular growth and gene expression are antagonized by activities of another member of the Myc superfamily, Mad. Characterization of the mouse homolog of human mad on the structural level revealed that domains shown previously to be required in the human protein for anti-Myc repression, sequence-specific DNA-binding activity, and dimerization with its partner Max are highly conserved. Conservation is also evident on the biological level in that both human and mouse mad can antagonize the ability of c-myc to cooperate with ras in the malignant transformation of cultured cells. An analysis of c-myc and mad gene expression in the developing mouse showed contrasting patterns with respect to tissue distribution and developmental stage. Regional differences in expression were more striking on the cellular level, particularly in the mouse and human gastrointestinal system, wherein c-Myc protein was readily detected in immature proliferating cells at the base of the colonic crypts, while Mad protein distribution was restricted to the postmitotic differentiated cells in the apex of the crypts. An increasing gradient of Mad was also evident in the more differentiated subcorneal layers of the stratified squamous epithelium of the skin. Together, these observations support the view that both downregulation of Myc and accumulation of Mad may be necessary for progression of precursor cells to a growth-arrested, terminally differentiated state.

Full text

PDF
8488

Images in this article

8490Fig. 1
on p.8490
8490Fig. 2
on p.8490
8491Fig. 3
on p.8491

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amati B., Brooks M. W., Levy N., Littlewood T. D., Evan G. I., Land H. Oncogenic activity of the c-Myc protein requires dimerization with Max. Cell. 1993 Jan 29;72(2):233–245. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90663-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auffray C., Rougeon F. Purification of mouse immunoglobulin heavy-chain messenger RNAs from total myeloma tumor RNA. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Jun;107(2):303–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb06030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayer D. E., Eisenman R. N. A switch from Myc:Max to Mad:Max heterocomplexes accompanies monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Genes Dev. 1993 Nov;7(11):2110–2119. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.11.2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayer D. E., Kretzner L., Eisenman R. N. Mad: a heterodimeric partner for Max that antagonizes Myc transcriptional activity. Cell. 1993 Jan 29;72(2):211–222. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90661-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayer D. E., Lawrence Q. A., Eisenman R. N. Mad-Max transcriptional repression is mediated by ternary complex formation with mammalian homologs of yeast repressor Sin3. Cell. 1995 Mar 10;80(5):767–776. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90355-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bello-Fernandez C., Packham G., Cleveland J. L. The ornithine decarboxylase gene is a transcriptional target of c-Myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7804–7808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackwell T. K., Kretzner L., Blackwood E. M., Eisenman R. N., Weintraub H. Sequence-specific DNA binding by the c-Myc protein. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1149–1151. doi: 10.1126/science.2251503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blackwood E. M., Eisenman R. N. Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. Science. 1991 Mar 8;251(4998):1211–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.2006410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen J., Willingham T., Margraf L. R., Schreiber-Agus N., DePinho R. A., Nisen P. D. Effects of the MYC oncogene antagonist, MAD, on proliferation, cell cycling and the malignant phenotype of human brain tumour cells. Nat Med. 1995 Jul;1(7):638–643. doi: 10.1038/nm0795-638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cordon-Cardo C., Richon V. M. Expression of the retinoblastoma protein is regulated in normal human tissues. Am J Pathol. 1994 Mar;144(3):500–510. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis A. C., Wims M., Spotts G. D., Hann S. R., Bradley A. A null c-myc mutation causes lethality before 10.5 days of gestation in homozygotes and reduced fertility in heterozygous female mice. Genes Dev. 1993 Apr;7(4):671–682. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.4.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Downs K. M., Martin G. R., Bishop J. M. Contrasting patterns of myc and N-myc expression during gastrulation of the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 1989 Jun;3(6):860–869. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.6.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferré-D'Amaré A. R., Prendergast G. C., Ziff E. B., Burley S. K. Recognition by Max of its cognate DNA through a dimeric b/HLH/Z domain. Nature. 1993 May 6;363(6424):38–45. doi: 10.1038/363038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisher D. E., Parent L. A., Sharp P. A. High affinity DNA-binding Myc analogs: recognition by an alpha helix. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):467–476. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuchs E. Epidermal differentiation: the bare essentials. J Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;111(6 Pt 2):2807–2814. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gietz R. D., Prakash S. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD4 gene required for excision repair of UV-damaged DNA. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):535–541. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90186-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirning U., Schmid P., Schulz W. A., Rettenberger G., Hameister H. A comparative analysis of N-myc and c-myc expression and cellular proliferation in mouse organogenesis. Mech Dev. 1991 Feb;33(2):119–125. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(91)90078-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jansen-Dürr P., Meichle A., Steiner P., Pagano M., Finke K., Botz J., Wessbecher J., Draetta G., Eilers M. Differential modulation of cyclin gene expression by MYC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 15;90(8):3685–3689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kato G. J., Barrett J., Villa-Garcia M., Dang C. V. An amino-terminal c-myc domain required for neoplastic transformation activates transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5914–5920. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kato G. J., Dang C. V. Function of the c-Myc oncoprotein. FASEB J. 1992 Sep;6(12):3065–3072. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.12.1521738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kretzner L., Blackwood E. M., Eisenman R. N. Myc and Max proteins possess distinct transcriptional activities. Nature. 1992 Oct 1;359(6394):426–429. doi: 10.1038/359426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lachman H. M., Cheng G. H., Skoultchi A. I. Transfection of mouse erythroleukemia cells with myc sequences changes the rate of induced commitment to differentiate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6480–6484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lahoz E. G., Xu L., Schreiber-Agus N., DePinho R. A. Suppression of Myc, but not E1a, transformation activity by Max-associated proteins, Mad and Mxi1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5503–5507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Land H., Parada L. F., Weinberg R. A. Tumorigenic conversion of primary embryo fibroblasts requires at least two cooperating oncogenes. Nature. 1983 Aug 18;304(5927):596–602. doi: 10.1038/304596a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Larsson L. G., Pettersson M., Oberg F., Nilsson K., Lüscher B. Expression of mad, mxi1, max and c-myc during induced differentiation of hematopoietic cells: opposite regulation of mad and c-myc. Oncogene. 1994 Apr;9(4):1247–1252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marcu K. B., Bossone S. A., Patel A. J. myc function and regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:809–860. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.004113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morgenbesser S. D., DePinho R. A. Use of transgenic mice to study myc family gene function in normal mammalian development and in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 1994 Feb;5(1):21–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mukherjee B., Morgenbesser S. D., DePinho R. A. Myc family oncoproteins function through a common pathway to transform normal cells in culture: cross-interference by Max and trans-acting dominant mutants. Genes Dev. 1992 Aug;6(8):1480–1492. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.8.1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prendergast G. C., Lawe D., Ziff E. B. Association of Myn, the murine homolog of max, with c-Myc stimulates methylation-sensitive DNA binding and ras cotransformation. Cell. 1991 May 3;65(3):395–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90457-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Prochownik E. V., Kukowska J., Rodgers C. c-myc antisense transcripts accelerate differentiation and inhibit G1 progression in murine erythroleukemia cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;8(9):3683–3695. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmid P., Schulz W. A., Hameister H. Dynamic expression pattern of the myc protooncogene in midgestation mouse embryos. Science. 1989 Jan 13;243(4888):226–229. doi: 10.1126/science.2911736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt G. H., Wilkinson M. M., Ponder B. A. Cell migration pathway in the intestinal epithelium: an in situ marker system using mouse aggregation chimeras. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):425–429. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90156-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schreiber-Agus N., Chin L., Chen K., Torres R., Rao G., Guida P., Skoultchi A. I., DePinho R. A. An amino-terminal domain of Mxi1 mediates anti-Myc oncogenic activity and interacts with a homolog of the yeast transcriptional repressor SIN3. Cell. 1995 Mar 10;80(5):777–786. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90356-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schreiber-Agus N., Chin L., Chen K., Torres R., Thomson C. T., Sacchettini J. C., DePinho R. A. Evolutionary relationships and functional conservation among vertebrate Max-associated proteins: the zebra fish homolog of Mxi1. Oncogene. 1994 Nov;9(11):3167–3177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schreiber-Agus N., Torres R., Horner J., Lau A., Jamrich M., DePinho R. A. Comparative analysis of the expression and oncogenic activities of Xenopus c-, N-, and L-myc homologs. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2456–2468. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Västrik I., Kaipainen A., Penttilä T. L., Lymboussakis A., Alitalo R., Parvinen M., Alitalo K. Expression of the mad gene during cell differentiation in vivo and its inhibition of cell growth in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;128(6):1197–1208. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.6.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zervos A. S., Gyuris J., Brent R. Mxi1, a protein that specifically interacts with Max to bind Myc-Max recognition sites. Cell. 1993 Jan 29;72(2):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90662-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zimmerman K. A., Yancopoulos G. D., Collum R. G., Smith R. K., Kohl N. E., Denis K. A., Nau M. M., Witte O. N., Toran-Allerand D., Gee C. E. Differential expression of myc family genes during murine development. 1986 Feb 27-Mar 5Nature. 319(6056):780–783. doi: 10.1038/319780a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES