Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to Indian Journal of Pharmacology
. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(4):460–462.

Author's Reply

Abdulbari Bener 1,✉, Muzeyyen Dogan 1, Lolwa Barakat 2, Abdulla OAA Al-Hamaq 3
PMCID: PMC4118552  PMID: 25097297

Madam,

We would like to thank reader for his/her valuabale comments. Meanwhile, I would like to clarify and reply to the reader point-by-point as given below:

  1. This study is a cohort observational population-based study conducted at Hamad Medical Hospital and PHC Centre.[1] A total of 1,542 consecutive diabetes patients who were diagnosed with dyslipidemia and prescribed any of the indicated statins between January 2007 and September 2013 were included in the study. Since the study is based on cohort time interval and subjects who met and satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria, there is no need for the sample size

  2. We do agree with the reader that there are typographical errors in the Results section. The third paragraph should read as: “Atorvastatin reduced LDL-C the most at a dose of 40 mg (15.9%) and atorvastatin reduced LDL-C the most at a dose of 20 mg (21.2%),” which is very clear and correct, as mentioned in Table 1 of the published article

  3. As can be observed from the title of Figure 1b stated as, “Number of patients with no microalbuminuria at baseline but developed it after 2 years”. Meanwhile, in the Results section the content and term has been used correctly; therefore, it is very obvious that the footnote of the graph incorrectly mentions microalbuminia instead of microalbuminuria. In fact, this typographical errors ocurred while using Excel Computer Software for graphical purposes

  4. It is true that we have solely mentioned the acquisition cost of rosuvastatin when compared to atorvastatin, which was available. We agree with the reader that a cost-effective analysis with the calculation of the incremental cost effectiveness ratio would have been much more appropriate and insightful; however, it was not main objective of this study.

Table 1.

Comparison of the efficacy of various statins in different doses (10, 20, and 40 mg)

graphic file with name IJPharm-46-460b-g001.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Rosuvastatin versus other statins, (b) Comparison of patients with pre- and posttreatment microalbuminuria at the end of 2 years

Reference

  • 1.Bener A, Dogan M, Barakat L, Al-Hamaq AO. Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of various statins in dyslipidemic diabetic patients. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014;46:88–93. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.125184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES