Abstract
GLUT2 is a facilitative glucose transporter, expressed in polarized epithelial cells of the liver, intestine, kidney and pancreas, where it plays a critical role in glucose homeostasis. Together with SGLT1/2, it mediates glucose absorption in metabolic epithelial tissues, where it can be translocated apically upon high glucose exposure. To track the subcellular localization and dynamics of GLUT2, we created an mCherry–hGLUT2 fusion protein and expressed it in multicellular kidney cysts, a major site of glucose reabsorption. Live imaging of GLUT2 enabled us to avoid the artefactual localization of GLUT2 in fixed cells and to confirm the apical GLUT2 model. Live cell imaging showed a rapid 15 ± 3 min PKC-dependent basal-to-apical translocation of GLUT2 in response to glucose stimulation and a fourfold slower basolateral translocation under starvation. These results mark the physiological importance of responding quickly to rising glucose levels. Importantly, we show that phloretin, an apple polyphenol, inhibits GLUT2 translocation in both directions, suggesting that it exerts its effect by PKC inhibition. Subcellular localization studies demonstrated that GLUT2 is endocytosed through a caveolae-dependent mechanism, and that it is at least partly recovered in Rab11A-positive recycling endosome. Our work illuminates GLUT2 dynamics, providing a platform for drug development for diabetes and hyperglycaemia.
Keywords: dynamic translocation, polarized renal epithelium, glucose homeostasis, live imaging, phloretin
2. Introduction
The facilitative transport of glucose in mammalian cells is mediated by a family of glucose transporters (GLUTs) that show distinct tissue distribution and biochemical properties [1]. GLUT2 is a low-affinity GLUT, expressed predominantly in intestine, liver, kidney and pancreatic β cells, where it mediates critical aspects of glucose homeostasis. GLUT2 plays an important role in the ability of pancreatic β cells to respond to rising glucose levels by secreting insulin [2,3], as well as in postprandial glucose uptake in the intestine and liver [4]. GLUT2 is also the major GLUT in the proximal tubules of the kidney, the main site of glucose reabsorption, where it acts with the Sodium-GLucose Transporter 2 (SGLT2). Loss of GLUT2 in patients suffering from Fanconi–Bickel syndrome results in glycogen accumulation, glucosuria and renal dysfunction [5]. Failure to maintain glucose homeostasis can result in persistent hyperglycaemia, diabetes or cerebral oedema.
Intestinal glucose absorption is mediated by SGLT1, whereas GLUT2 was traditionally considered to enable a basolateral flux [4,6,7]. More recently it was shown that GLUT2 could be apically localized in intestinal cell lines and tissues. The apical translocation of GLUT2 is triggered by membrane depolarization via SGLT1, resulting in a large influx of Ca2+, which induces a global cytoskeletal rearrangement, leading to apical localization and activation of PKC βII [8,9]. Insulin was also shown to prevent GLUT2 glucose-dependent apical insertion in mice [10]. Regretfully, renal systems have not been as widely studied as the intestine. Fanconi–Bickel syndrome patients show a mutation in GLUT2 that causes problems in glucose reabsorption and associated renal dysfunction [5]. Apical localization of GLUT2 has been shown in the renal brush border membrane (BBM) of diabetic rats [11], and was correlated with high glucose concentration and PKC βI activation [12].
Live cell imaging was previously used to characterize GLUT4 translocation in adipocytes [13], demonstrating insulin-dependent GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane. However, tracking GLUT2 localization and dynamics is more difficult due to GLUT2 distinct localization in polarized epithelial architecture. In this work, we used Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) type II cells because they were derived from normal kidney and, when cultured in gels of extracellular matrix, can form multicellular structures of polarized epithelium with distinct basolateral and apical surfaces (figure 1a). This process was shown to mimic to the physiological development of epithelial kidney tissue in vivo [14].
In this work, we established an MDCK II cell line expressing a C-terminal hGLUT2–mCherry fusion protein, which enabled live imaging of glucose-dependent dynamics of GLUT2 in the polarized kidney cells. We show that high glucose exposure results in a PKC-dependent rapid redistribution of GLUT2 from the basolateral to the apical pole of the cells, while the removal of glucose results in a fourfold slower trafficking of GLUT2 to the basal membrane. Interestingly, we show that phloretin, a widely used inhibitor of GLUT2 activity, blocks GLUT2 translocation in both directions. We suggest that the phloretin ability to inhibit PKC activity underlies this effect. Finally, subcellular localization and dynamics show that GLUT2 is endocytosed by a clathrin-independent mechanism and is targeted to Rab11A-positive recycling endosome.
3. Material and methods
3.1. Reagents
Phenol red-free Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM), phosphate-buffered saline with Mg2+ and Ca2+ (PBS), mannitol, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), phloretin, calphostin C, Filipin and Dynasore were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), l-alanine-l-glutamine, trypsin and sodium pyruvate were ordered from Biological Industries (Beit-Haemek, Israel). Lipofectamine 2000 and G418 antibiotic were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). EM-grade paraformaldehyde was bought from Polysciences (Warrington, PA), Pitstop2 from ABCAM (Cambridge, UK) and conjugated human holo-transferrin from Jackson Laboratories (Sacramento, CA). Unless otherwise noted, all other reagents were ordered from Sigma Aldrich.
3.2. GLUT2–mCherry lines
hGLUT2 coding sequence was amplified from HepG2 hepatoma cells (ATCC) and cloned into XhoI and BamHI restriction sites of pmCherry C1 vector containing G418 resistance cassette (Clonetech, Mountain View, CA). MDCK type II cells (ATCC) were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 according to manufacturer's protocol and maintained under G418 antibiotic selection. Cells were cultured in DMEM culture medium supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, non-essential amino acids and l-alanine-l-glutamine. All cells were cultured under standard conditions (i.e. 37°C in a humidified incubator under 5% CO2).
3.3. Subcellular compartment reporters
The following constructs were used to transiently transfect MDCK II cells expressing the C-terminal GLUT2–mCherry fusion protein: Rab5A-YFP (kind gift of Mikael Simons, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Gottingen, Germany); Rab7A-GFP (kind gift of Benjamin Aroeti, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel); Rab11A-GFP (kind gift of Jim Goldenring, Vanderbilt University, USA [15]); Furin-CFP (kind gift of Sima Lev, the Weizmann Institute, Israel); Clathrin LC pEGFP (kind gift of Volker Haucke, FMF Berlin, Germany); GFP-C1-TfnR (kind gift of Gary Banker, Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology, Oregon Health Sciences University, USA [16]); and Caveolin1-GFP (kind gift of Ari Helenius, ETH Zurich, Switzerland [17]). Plasmid transfection was carried out as described above. Microscopy evaluation of co-localization with GLUT2 mCherry was carried out 12–24 h after reporter transfection.
3.4. Madin Darby canine kidney type II spheroid polarization and imaging
MDCK II cells were differentiated into hollow polarized cysts according to the protocol described by Elia & Lippincott-Schwartz [18]. Briefly, collagen gel solution was prepared by mixing 2 mg ml−1 rat-tail collagen type-I with 24 mM glutamine, 2.8 mM NaHCO3 and 20 mM HEPES buffer, in ice-cold DMEM. The bottom of each 8-well cover-glass slide (Nunc Lab-Tek II) was coated with 45 μl collagen solution by incubating the slide for 30 min at 37°C. GLUT2–mCherry expressing MDCK II cells were trypsinized and added to the collagen solution at a density of 3.7 × 104 cells ml−1. Collagen and cell suspension (125 ml) was added to pre-coated wells and allowed to gel for 60 min at 37°C. Culture medium was added to each well and cells were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 4–12 days, with daily media changes, until a central lumen was visible.
3.5. GLUT2 translocation
MDCK II cells expressing C-terminal GLUT2–mCherry fusion protein were incubated in PBS with Mg2+ and Ca2+ (buffer), in the presence or absence of 75 mM glucose, 100 nM PMA or 75 mM mannitol. Cells were counterstained with Hoechst for 1 h before visualization. For the fixation reported in figure 1e, 4% paraformaldehyde was added directly to PBS containing 75 mM glucose, incubated for 30 min, briefly washed and visualized.
Time-lapse microscopy of GLUT2 translocation was carried out by replacing PBS buffer with one containing 75 mM glucose or vice versa. Inhibition of GLUT2 translocation was carried out by 30 min pre-incubation with 1 mM phloretin or 50 nM Calphostin C and in the presence of those inhibitors. Cells were counterstained with Hoechst for 1 h before visualization.
3.6. GLUT2 endocytosis
To assess clathrin-dependent endocytosis GLUT2–mCherry expressing MDCK II cells were transiently transfected with hTfR-pEGFPC1 construct as described above. Eight hours after transfection, the cells were transferred into DMEM medium supplemented with 0.6% BSA, and cultured overnight. The cells were then incubated for 1 h in PBS buffer to induce externalization of GLUT2 to the plasma membrane, followed by 30 min incubation with 30 μM Pitstop2 or 80 μM Dynasore. Endocytosis of GLUT2 was then induced by exposure to 75 mM glucose in the presence of the inhibitor and 5 μg ml−1 AF647-conjugated Transferrin. Internalization of GLUT2–mCherry and AF647-Transferrin was quantified 15 min after induction of endocytosis.
To assess caveolae-dependent endocytosis GLUT2–mCherry expressing MDCK II cells were transiently transfected with CAVEOLIN1-GFP construct as described above. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were incubated for 1 h in PBS buffer to induce externalization of GLUT2 to the plasma membrane, followed by 30 min incubation with 5 μg ml−1 Filipin. Endocytosis of GLUT2 was then induced by exposure to 75 mM glucose in the presence of the inhibitor. Cells were imaged 5, 15 and 25 min after induction of endocytosis.
3.7. Microscopy
Fluorescence images were taken using a Zeiss LSM 700 imaging system (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with LD Plan Neufluor 20× objective (NA 0.4, WD 7.9 mm). Images were analysed using ZEN 2012 Blue software (Carl Zeiss). Confocal imaging of subcellular co-localization and three-dimensional imaging of spheroids was carried out on the same system in confocal mode using solid-state laser lines 405, 488, 555 and 639 nm. Confocal images were taken with C-Apochromat 40× water immersion objective (NA 1.8, WD 0.28 mm). Analysis was carried out using ZEN 2011 Black software (Carl Zeiss).
3.8. Long-term water immersion microscopy
Evaporative loss of water immersion fluid at 37°C was countered by microfluidics. Briefly, a Chemyx Fusion 200 syringe pump was used to perfuse water at a rate of 10 μl min−1 through Tygon microtube with a 0.01″ internal diameter. Water formed a droplet at the end of the tubing, and was pulled into the interface between the glass coverslip and the objective by capillary forces. This design permits water immersion microscopy for over 10 h at 37°C.
4. Results
4.1. Glucose induces basal to apical re-localization of GLUT2 in kidney cysts
GLUT2 cDNA was amplified from human liver cells, and subcloned, in frame, downstream of mCherry coding sequence, driven by a CMV-based promoter. This construct was stably transfected in MDCK type II cells, and the fusion protein was tracked by live cell imaging. Cells cultured in PBS buffer lacking glucose exhibited predominant plasma membrane localization of GLUT2, while exposure to 75 mM glucose resulted in cytoplasmic re-localization (figure 1b). To track GLUT2 relevant physiological localization, we cultured GLUT2–mCherry MDCK II cells in collagen gels, allowing them to form multicellular renal cysts with an inner apical surface and an outer basal surface (figure 1a) [14]. Cysts cultured in PBS buffer exhibited primarily basal localization of GLUT2, corresponding to two-dimensional plasma membrane localization (figure 1b). By contrast, the addition of 75 mM glucose caused re-distribution of GLUT2 to the apical pole of the cells, corresponding to two-dimensional perinuclear localization (figure 1b). Quantitative profiles of fluorescence intensities confirmed these basic qualitative observations, as GLUT2 localization in the cysts exhibited a clear redistribution of GLUT2 from basal to apical and basal cytoplasmic regions surrounding the centrally located nucleus (figure 1c).
To verify that osmolarity had no effect on GLUT2 localization, we exposed the cells to mannitol. Exposure to 75 mM mannitol did not alter the plasma membrane localization of GLUT2, suggesting that transporter localization was glucose-dependent (figure 1d). Previous work suggested that GLUT2 apical insertion in intestinal cells is associated with PKC βII activation [9,19]. Here, we show that exposure to 100 nM PMA, a non-specific PKC activator, promotes similar apical membrane localization of GLUT2 in kidney cells (figure 1d).
Interestingly, when comparing the localization of GLUT2 by live imaging to fixed cells, we observed a clear difference. Cells that underwent fixation showed clear plasma membrane localization regardless of glucose concentration (figure 1e). Such fixation-induced artefacts were reported in a variety of systems [20] and may have led others to conclude that GLUT2 is localized solely on basolateral surfaces (reviewed in [8]).
4.2. Dynamics of GLUT2 translocation
To determine the dynamics of GLUT2 translocation in MDCK monolayer, we carried out time-lapse microscopy of glucose-induced internalization (figure 2a–d; electronic supplementary material, movie S1) and glucose removal-induced externalization of the GLUT2 fusion protein (figure 2e–h; electronic supplementary material, movie S1). GLUT2–mCherry fluorescence was quantified at the plasma membrane (red) and perinuclear (blue) regions of each sequence. Our results showed that glucose-induced internalization was a fast process, peaking at 15.5 ± 2.8 min after glucose stimulations, as seen by the decrease of GLUT2 fluorescence at plasma membrane region coming to a near standstill at this time (figure 2b). However, glucose removal resulted in a 3.6-fold slower process of externalization peaking at 55.5 ± 4.0 min after stimulation (figure 2f). Interestingly, the majority of GLUT2–mCherry fusion protein was localized to the plasma membrane in two-dimensional cultures, showing minor changes compared with the perinuclear fraction.
To confirm these dynamics in polarized epithelial cysts, we carried out confocal time-lapse imaging in collagen-embedded cysts. PBS buffer was switched to PBS with or without 75 mM glucose as described above. Our results show that glucose-induced translocation to the apical surface was completed in 14 min (figure 2i,j), whereas glucose removal-induced translocation to the basal surface was fourfold slower, completing in just under 60 min (figure 2l,m).
4.3. Phloretin blocks both basal and apical GLUT2 translocation
Phloretin is a polyphenol found in apple trees' leaves [21], widely used as a glucose transport inhibitor. It is thought that phloretin exerts its effect by binding to GLUT2 and SGLT1 [22,23]. However, other work showed phloretin inhibits PKC [24], suggesting it might directly affect GLUT2 translocation. To test this hypothesis, we performed time-lapse microscopy of glucose-induced internalization (figure 2c; electronic supplementary material, movie S2) and glucose removal-induced externalization (figure 2g; electronic supplementary material, movie S2) following 30 min of pre-incubation with 1 mM phloretin. We found that both glucose-induced internalization and glucose removal-induced externalization of GLUT2 were inhibited by phloretin (figure 2c,g).
To confirm phloretin inhibition in polarized kidney cysts, we performed the same experiment on cells embedded in collagen gel. Our results show that 1 mM phloretin causes GLUT2 translocation to the apical membrane to fail in the presence of glucose and we observe GLUT2 localization only the basal (outer) membrane (figure 2i,k). Similarly, phloretin causes GLUT2 translocation to the basal membrane to fail following glucose removal and we observe GLUT2 on both membranes (figure 2l,n).
To further investigate the effect of phloretin on GLUT2, and its underlying mechanism, we were able to show that phloretin inhibits GLUT2 internalization and externalization with IC50 values of 2.13 ± 0.49 μM and 0.61 ± 0.44 μM, respectively (electronic supplementary material, figure S1a). These concentrations are three orders of magnitude lower than the concentration previously used to inhibit glucose uptake by GLUT2 (1 mM; reviewed in [4]). To further assess how phloretin affected GLUT2 mobility, we performed FRAP analysis in the absence or presence of phloretin. Our results show that GLUT2 mobility in the plasma membrane did not change under any condition (electronic supplementary material, figure S1b,c); however, GLUT2 mobility in the perinuclear region dramatically increased following glucose removal, due to active translocation to the plasma membrane (electronic supplementary material, figure 1c). The addition of phloretin reduced GLUT2 mobility at the perinuclear region to its basal level following glucose removal in the presence of glucose (electronic supplementary material, figure S1c).
Glucose deprivation and PKC inhibition were previously shown to affect the expression level of GLUTs [25,26]. To rule out phloretin effects on GLUT2 expression, we analysed cells grown in the absence or presence of phloretin for 24 h by FACS and found no significant effect on GLUT2 expression (electronic supplementary material, figure S1d).
4.4. PKC inhibition blocks GLUT2 translocation
Our results suggest that phloretin blocks GLUT2 translocation, possibly due to PKC inhibition [27]. Interestingly, other PKC inhibitors were similarly shown to inhibit glucose uptake in intestinal cells [28]. We suspected other PKC inhibitors, such as calphostin C, might similarly block GLUT2 translocation. To test this hypothesis, we performed time-lapse microscopy of glucose-induced internalization and glucose removal-induced GLUT2 externalization following 30 min of pre-incubation with 50 nM calphostin C. Again we found that both glucose-induced internalization and glucose removal-induced externalization of GLUT2 were similarly inhibited by treatment with calphostin C (figure 2d,h). These results suggest that phloretin, calphostin C and other PKC inhibitors might serve as GLUT2 inhibitors due to their ability to block GLUT2 translocation to the appropriate cell membrane.
4.5. GLUT2 is internalized by a caveolae-dependent mechanism in kidney cells
Previous work suggested that hepatic GLUT2 is internalized together with the insulin receptor [29] in a clathrin-dependent mechanism [29,30]. To evaluate whether renal GLUT2 is internalized by a similar mechanism, we studied the co-localization of GLUT2–mCherry with GFP-labelled Clathrin light chain (LC) or Caveolin1. We show that GLUT2 co-localized with Caveolin1, but did not co-localize with Clathrin LC (figure 3a). We then examined the ability of clathrin-dependent endocytosis inhibitors Dynasore [31] and Pitstop2 [32] to inhibit glucose-induced GLUT2 endocytosis. We found that both inhibitors significantly inhibited the entry of AF647-labelled transferrin, a known cargo of clathrin-coated pits [33]; however, both inhibitors did not affect GLUT2 internalization (figure 3b). By contrast, Filipin, an inhibitor of caveolae-dependent endocytosis [34], significantly inhibited glucose-induced GLUT2 internalization (figure 3c).
4.6. GLUT2 is recycled through the endosome pathway
In Min6 B1 pancreatic cell line, GLUT2 is internalized in response to glucose and undergoes rapid degradation [35,36]. By contrast, hepatic GLUT2 exhibits feeding-mediated internalization to an endosomal pool [37]. To decipher GLUT2 subcellular localization in kidney cells, we studied the co-localization of GLUT2–mCherry with YFP-labelled Rab5A (early endosome marker [38]), GFP-labelled Rab11A (recycling endosome marker [39]), GFP-labelled Rab7A (late endosome marker [40]) or CFP-labelled Furin (trans-Golgi network marker [41]). Endocytosis was induced at 20°C, because slowing the endocytic process allowed the identification of compartments that are briefly occupied by GLUT2. We found that GLUT2 localizes to early endosomes, recycling endosomes, late endosomes and the trans-Golgi network (figure 3d). Taken together, our data suggest that glucose stimulation induces caveolae-dependent GLUT2 endocytosis to the endosome pathway from which it is targeted, at least in part, for recycling (figure 3e).
5. Discussion
In our work, we focused on the mechanism and dynamics of GLUT2 trafficking in the kidney, a major site of glucose reabsorption, and an important pharmaceutical target in diabetes. We established a physiologically relevant system for live imaging of GLUT2 localization and translocation in multicellular cysts of polarized renal epithelial cells (MDCK type II). We show fixation artefact trapping GLUT2 in cellular membrane, highlighting the advantages of live imaging for direct tracking of transporter trafficking. Live imaging also allowed us to quantify GLUT2 dynamics, showing rapid redistribution to the apical membrane following glucose stimulation, compared with a fourfold slower translocation to the basal membrane following glucose removal. These results mark the physiological importance of responding quickly to rising glucose levels. In addition, moving only a fraction of GLUT2 from the basal to the apical surface permits a rapid reabsorption of glucose from the kidney filtrate directly to the blood, bypassing the intracellular compartment.
Pairing our GLUT2–mCherry fusion protein against a library of subcellular markers allowed us to decipher its endocytic pathway in kidney cells. Interestingly, GLUT2 in kidney cells internalize via a caveolae-dependent mechanism, unlike GLUT2 clathrin-mediated entry to liver cells. By contrast, we show that renal GLUT2 enters the endosome system, as in liver cells, and is at least partly recycled in Rab11A-labelled endosomes. This result stands in contrast to pancreatic GLUT2, which is targeted for rapid degradation.
Using live imaging of GLUT4-GFP fusion protein, Fletcher et al. [13] were able to unravel much of its translocation mechanism in adipocytes. Live imaging also removes staining artefacts resulting from fixation (as shown here) or from using inappropriate antibodies. One such detected artefact raised some controversy about the localization of GLUT2 to the apical membrane, which resulted from the inability to detect GLUT2 using antibodies raised against the C-terminal of GLUT2 [42], which is masked [43,44] by phosphorylation or interaction with regulatory proteins [45,46].
Phloretin has been known to inhibit transport of chlorine, urea and sugars through membranes by binding to membrane lipid components and altering membrane permeability [47–50]. Phloretin was subsequently found to block sugar uptake in intestinal tissue [51], drawing significant interest to its application in the treatment of diabetes. Phloretin was shown to specifically inhibit GLUT2 and to a lesser extent SGLT1 [22,52]. Here, we show that phloretin inhibits the transport of GLUT2 between the apical and basal membranes in both directions. Our data suggest that phloretin inhibition of GLUT2 might be timing dependent (i.e. taken after a meal, this dietary supplement might in fact increase glucose absorption). Previous work using phloretin to inhibit glucose uptake by GLUT2 in rat intestine was performed using 1 mM phloretin, two orders of magnitude higher than its IC50 for inhibition of PKC. In rat intestine, at least, there are two components of apical GLUT2, differing in their trafficking speed and PKC dependence. One millimolar of phloretin was necessary to inhibit absorption by both components at 75 mM glucose, while maintaining specificity [52,53]. Here, we present IC50 values for inhibition of GLUT2 translocation by phloretin that suggest that the ability to inhibit PKC activity underlies its inhibition of GLUT2 translocation. Strengthening this hypothesis is the finding that Calphostin C, a potent inhibitor of PKC [54] and glucose uptake [55–57], similarly blocks GLUT2 translocation in both directions. Furthermore, we see no change in GLUT2 mobility in the plasma membrane in the presence of phloretin, but its intracellular mobility was dramatically inhibited, suggesting that the inhibition of GLUT2 translocation is independent of its ability to bind lipid membranes.
In summary, our work elucidates the dynamics of GLUT2 translocation in polarized kidney cells. We show that these dynamics mimic the physiological need to respond fast to changing glucose levels. GLUT2 internalization in kidney cells differs from the liver, possibly due to differences in association with the insulin receptor, which needs to respond faster in liver cells than in kidney to changing insulin and glucose levels. We note that hyperglycaemia causes GLUT2 apical insertion to the BBM of proximal tubule cells [12], and under insulin insensitivity or in lack of insulin, GLUT2 is not internalized [10], leading to increased reabsorption of glucose. MDCK II cells do not express the insulin receptor [58] and therefore mimic proximal tube renal cells in type-I diabetes. We suggest that this system can be used to identify new compounds that inhibit GLUT2 apical localization induced by hyperglycaemia.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Aviv Rotman, Dr Efrat Zlotkin and Yishai Avior for technical support. The authors thank Dr Daniel Kaganovich for critical discussion.
Funding statement
This work was supported by the European Research Council Starting grant (TMIHCV 242699). Resources were provided by the Silberman Institute of Life Sciences and the Alexander Grass Center for Bioengineering of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
References
- 1.Mueckler M, Thorens B. 2013. The SLC2 (GLUT) family of membrane transporters. Mol. Aspects Med. 34, 121–138. (doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.07.001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thorens B, Sarkar HK, Kaback HR, Lodish HF. 1988. Cloning and functional expression in bacteria of a novel glucose transporter present in liver, intestine, kidney, and beta-pancreatic islet cells. Cell 55, 281–290. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90051-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Olson AL, Pessin JE. 1996. Structure, function, and regulation of the mammalian facilitative glucose transporter gene family. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 16, 235–256. (doi:10.1146/annurev.nu.16.070196.001315) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kellett GL, Brot-Laroche E, Mace OJ, Leturque A. 2008. Sugar absorption in the intestine: the role of GLUT2. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 28, 35–54. (doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.28.061807.155518) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sakamoto O, Ogawa E, Ohura T, Igarashi Y, Matsubara Y, Narisawa K, Iinuma K. 2000. Mutation analysis of the GLUT2 gene in patients with Fanconi-Bickel syndrome. Pediatr. Res. 48, 586–589. (doi:10.1203/00006450-200011000-00005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dominguez JH, Camp K, Maianu L, Garvey WT. 1992. Glucose transporters of rat proximal tubule: differential expression and subcellular distribution. Am. J. Physiol. 262, F807–F812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mather A, Pollock C. 2011. Glucose handling by the kidney. Kidney Int. Suppl. 79, S1–S6. (doi:10.1038/ki.2010.509) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kellett GL, Brot-Laroche E. 2005. Apical GLUT2: a major pathway of intestinal sugar absorption. Diabetes 54, 3056–3062. (doi:10.2337/diabetes.54.10.3056) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Helliwell PA, Richardson M, Affleck J, Kellett GL. 2000. Stimulation of fructose transport across the intestinal brush-border membrane by PMA is mediated by GLUT2 and dynamically regulated by protein kinase C. Biochem. J. 350 149–154. (doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3500149) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tobin V, et al. 2008. Insulin internalises GLUT2 in the enterocytes of healthy but not insulin-resistant mice. Diabetes 57, 555–562. (doi:10.2337/db07-0928) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marks J, Carvou NJ, Debnam ES, Srai SK, Unwin RJ. 2003. Diabetes increases facilitative glucose uptake and GLUT2 expression at the rat proximal tubule brush border membrane. J. Physiol. 553, 137–145. (doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.046268) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goestemeyer AK, Marks J, Srai SK, Debnam ES, Unwin RJ. 2007. GLUT2 protein at the rat proximal tubule brush border membrane correlates with protein kinase C (PKC)-betal and plasma glucose concentration. Diabetologia 50, 2209–2217. (doi:10.1007/s00125-007-0778-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fletcher LM, Welsh GI, Oatey PB, Tavare JM. 2000. Role for the microtubule cytoskeleton in GLUT4 vesicle trafficking and in the regulation of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Biochem. J. 352, 267–276. (doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3520267) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bryant DM, Mostov KE. 2008. From cells to organs: building polarised tissue. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 887–901. (doi:10.1038/nrm2523) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ducharme NA, Hales CM, Lapierre LA, Ham AJ, Oztan A, Apodaca G, Goldenring JR. 2006. MARK2/EMK1/Par-1Balpha phosphorylation of Rab11-family interacting protein 2 is necessary for the timely establishment of polarity in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 3625–3637. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0736) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Perez Bay AE, et al. 2013. The kinesin KIF16B mediates apical transcytosis of transferrin receptor in AP-1B-deficient epithelia. EMBO J. 32, 2125–2139. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.130) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tagawa A, Mezzacasa A, Hayer A, Longatti A, Pelkmans L, Helenius A. 2005. Assembly and trafficking of caveolar domains in the cell: caveolae as stable, cargo-triggered, vesicular transporters. J. Cell Biol. 170, 769–779. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200506103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Elia N, Lippincott-Schwartz J. 2009. Culturing MDCK cells in three dimensions for analyzing intracellular: dynamics. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. ch. 4, unit 4.22. (doi:10.1002/0471143030.cb0422s43) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Helliwell PA, Rumsby MG, Kellett GL. 2003. Intestinal sugar absorption is regulated by phosphorylation and turnover of protein kinase C betaII mediated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase- and mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 28 644–28 650. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M301479200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schnell U, Dijk F, Sjollema KA, Giepmans BN. 2012. Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging. Nat. Methods 9, 152–158. (doi:10.1038/nmeth.1855) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mangas JJ, Rodriguez R, Suarez B, Picinelli A, Dapena E. 1999. Study of the phenolic profile of cider apple cultivars at maturity by multivariate techniques. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 4046–4052. (doi:10.1021/jf9903197) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Betz AL, Drewes LR, Gilboe DD. 1975. Inhibition of glucose transport into brain by phlorizin, phloretin and glucose analogues. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 406, 505–515. (doi:10.1016/0005-2736(75)90028-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corpe CP, Basaleh MM, Affleck J, Gould G, Jess TJ, Kellett GL. 1996. The regulation of GLUT5 and GLUT2 activity in the adaptation of intestinal brush-border fructose transport in diabetes. Pflugers Arch. 432, 192–201. (doi:10.1007/s004240050124) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cernescu C, Constantinescu SN, Balta F, Popescu LM, Cajal N. 1989. Protein kinase C and the antiviral effect of human interferon. Virologie 40, 163–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Boado RJ, Pardridge WM. 1993. Glucose deprivation causes posttranscriptional enhancement of brain capillary endothelial glucose transporter gene expression via GLUT1 mRNA stabilization. J. Neurochem. 60, 2290–2296. (doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03516.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nose A, Mori Y, Uchiyama-Tanaka Y, Kishimoto N, Maruyama K, Matsubara H, Iwasaka T. 2003. Regulation of glucose transporter (GLUT1) gene expression by angiotensin II in mesangial cells: involvement of HB-EGF and EGF receptor transactivation. Hypertens. Res. 26, 67–73. (doi:10.1291/hypres.26.67) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Emeljanova VP, Baranova LA, Volotovski ID. 2002. Effect of modulators of protein kinase C activity on Ca2+ transport in retinal rod microsomes. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 67, 441–445. (doi:10.1023/A:1015234023092) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zheng Y, Sarr MG. 2012. Translocation of transfected GLUT2 to the apical membrane in rat intestinal IEC-6 cells. Dig. Dis. Sci. 57, 1203–1212. (doi:10.1007/s10620-011-1984-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eisenberg ML, Maker AV, Slezak LA, Nathan JD, Sritharan KC, Jena BP, Geibel JP, Andersen DK. 2005. Insulin receptor (IR) and glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) proteins form a complex on the rat hepatocyte membrane. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 15, 51–58. (doi:10.1159/000083638) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jose M, Biosca JA, Trujillo R, Itarte E. 1993. Characterization of the hepatic insulin receptor undergoing internalization through clathrin-coated vesicles and endosomes. FEBS Lett. 334, 286–288. (doi:10.1016/0014-5793(93)80696-R) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Macia E, Ehrlich M, Massol R, Boucrot E, Brunner C, Kirchhausen T. 2006. Dynasore, a cell-permeable inhibitor of dynamin. Dev. Cell 10, 839–850. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.von Kleist L, et al. 2011. Role of the clathrin terminal domain in regulating coated pit dynamics revealed by small molecule inhibition. Cell 146, 471–484. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.025) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kirchhausen T. 2009. Imaging endocytic clathrin structures in living cells. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 596–605. (doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2009.09.002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schnitzer JE, Oh P, Pinney E, Allard J. 1994. Filipin-sensitive caveolae-mediated transport in endothelium: reduced transcytosis, scavenger endocytosis, and capillary permeability of select macromolecules. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1217–1232. (doi:10.1083/jcb.127.5.1217) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thorens B, Gerard N, Deriaz N. 1993. GLUT2 surface expression and intracellular transport via the constitutive pathway in pancreatic beta cells and insulinoma: evidence for a block in trans-Golgi network exit by brefeldin A. J. Cell Biol. 123, 1687–1694. (doi:10.1083/jcb.123.6.1687) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hou JC, Williams D, Vicogne J, Pessin JE. 2009. The glucose transporter 2 undergoes plasma membrane endocytosis and lysosomal degradation in a secretagogue-dependent manner. Endocrinology 150, 4056–4064. (doi:10.1210/en.2008-1685) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nathan JD, Zdankiewicz PD, Wang J, Spector SA, Aspelund G, Jena BP, Seymour NE, Geibel JP, Andersen DK. 2001. Impaired hepatocyte glucose transport protein (GLUT2) internalization in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 22, 172–178. (doi:10.1097/00006676-200103000-00010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gorvel JP, Chavrier P, Zerial M, Gruenberg J. 1991. rab5 controls early endosome fusion in vitro. Cell 64, 915–925. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90316-Q) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ullrich O, Reinsch S, Urbe S, Zerial M, Parton RG. 1996. Rab11 regulates recycling through the pericentriolar recycling endosome. J. Cell Biol. 135, 913–924. (doi:10.1083/jcb.135.4.913) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chavrier P, Gorvel JP, Stelzer E, Simons K, Gruenberg J, Zerial M. 1991. Hypervariable C-terminal domain of rab proteins acts as a targeting signal. Nature 353, 769–772. (doi:10.1038/353769a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shapiro J, Sciaky N, Lee J, Bosshart H, Angeletti RH, Bonifacino JS. 1997. Localization of endogenous furin in cultured cell lines. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 45, 3–12. (doi:10.1177/002215549704500102) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thorens B, Weir GC, Leahy JL, Lodish HF, Bonner-Weir S. 1990. Reduced expression of the liver/beta-cell glucose transporter isoform in glucose-insensitive pancreatic beta cells of diabetic rats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6492–6496. (doi:10.1073/pnas.87.17.6492) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Affleck JA, Helliwell PA, Kellett GL. 2003. Immunocytochemical detection of GLUT2 at the rat intestinal brush-border membrane. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 51, 1567–1574. (doi:10.1177/002215540305101116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gouyon F, et al. 2003. Simple-sugar meals target GLUT2 at enterocyte apical membranes to improve sugar absorption: a study in GLUT2-null mice. J. Physiol. 552, 823–832. (doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049247) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thorens B. 1996. Glucose transporters in the regulation of intestinal, renal, and liver glucose fluxes. Am. J. Physiol. 270, G541–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lam NT, Cheung AT, Riedel MJ, Light PE, Cheeseman CI, Kieffer TJ. 2004. Leptin reduces glucose transport and cellular ATP levels in INS-1 beta-cells. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 32, 415–424. (doi:10.1677/jme.0.0320415) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Alvarado F. 1967. Hypothesis for the interaction of phlorizin and phloretin with membrane carriers for sugars. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 135, 483–495. (doi:10.1016/0005-2736(67)90038-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Macey RI, Farmer RE. 1970. Inhibition of water and solute permeability in human red cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 211, 104–106. (doi:10.1016/0005-2736(70)90130-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Andersen OS, Finkelstein A, Katz I, Cass A. 1976. Effect of phloretin on the permeability of thin lipid membranes. J. Gen. Physiol. 67, 749–771. (doi:10.1085/jgp.67.6.749) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Robinson JW. 1981. Effect of phloretin on transport processes in guinea-pig kidney cortex slices. Gen. Pharmacol. 12, 273–277. (doi:10.1016/0306-3623(81)90057-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Diedrich DF. 1968. Is phloretin the sugar transport inhibitor in intestine? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 127, 803–812. (doi:10.1016/0003-9861(68)90292-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kellett GL, Helliwell PA. 2000. The diffusive component of intestinal glucose absorption is mediated by the glucose-induced recruitment of GLUT2 to the brush-border membrane. Biochem. J. 350 55–62. (doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3500155) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gschwendt M, Horn F, Kittstein W, Furstenberger G, Besemfelder E, Marks F. 1984. Calcium and phospholipid-dependent protein kinase activity in mouse epidermis cytosol: stimulation by complete and incomplete tumor promoters and inhibition by various compounds. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 124, 63–68. (doi:10.1016/0006-291X(84)90916-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kobayashi E, Nakano H, Morimoto M, Tamaoki T. 1989. Calphostin C (UCN-1028C), a novel microbial compound, is a highly potent and specific inhibitor of protein kinase C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159, 548–553. (doi:10.1016/0006-291X(89)90028-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yang XY, Fekete Z, Gardner J, Benevenia J, Aviv A. 1994. Endothelin mobilises calcium and enhances glucose uptake in cultured human skeletal myoblasts and L6 myotubes. Hypertension 23, 1075–1081. (doi:10.1161/01.HYP.23.6.1075) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yasunari K, Kohno M, Kano H, Minami M, Yoshikawa J. 2000. Aldose reductase inhibitor improves insulin-mediated glucose uptake and prevents migration of human coronary artery smooth muscle cells induced by high glucose. Hypertension 35, 1092–1098. (doi:10.1161/01.HYP.35.5.1092) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jensen J, Heller RS, Funder-Nielsen T, Pedersen EE, Lindsell C, Weinmaster G, Madsen OD, Serup P. 2000. Independent development of pancreatic alpha- and beta-cells from neurogenin3-expressing precursors: a role for the notch pathway in repression of premature differentiation. Diabetes 49, 163–176. (doi:10.2337/diabetes.49.2.163) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hofmann CA, Lotan RM, Ku WW, Oeltmann TN. 1983. Insulin-ricin B hybrid molecules mediate an insulin-associated effect on cells which do not bind insulin. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 11 774–11 779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.