Abstract
BACKGROUND
Recent guidelines have proposed that there is a correlation between tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody titers and degrees of duodenal biopsy, and that duodenal biopsy can be omitted in some patients with high levels of tTG antibody. Using data of registered patients in a gastrointestinal clinic we aimed to assess the correlation between tissue transglutaminase antibody with duodenal histologic Marsh grading in Iranian patients with celiac disease.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed hospital files of registered patients in the gastrointestinal clinic of Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Demographic, laboratory, and histology data of those who had tTG titer and pathology reports of duodenal biopsy based on the modified Marsh classification were extracted and used for the study.
RESULTS
159 patients with available tTG titer and pathology reports were enrolled in our study. Mean ±SD of the patients was 35.6±15.2 and 100 (62.9%) of them were women. 133 out of 153 patients had villous atrophy (Marsh IIIa-IIIc). Anemia was the most common sign and bloating, abdominal pain, and diarrhea were the first three common symptoms in these patients. Mean tTG titers was significantly higher in patients graded as Marsh III (p for trend=0.003). Our results showed that tTG titer more than 9 folds higher than the kit’s cut-off value was about 97.2% sensitive for Marsh II and more duodenal damage.
CONCLUSION
There was a correlation between tTG titers and degrees of duodenal damage in patients with celiac disease. Duodenal biopsy is not always necessary for diagnosing celiac disease and when tTG level is more than 9 folds higher than the manufacture’s recommended cut-off value it can be avoided. Meanwhile small intestinal biopsy should always be considered in case of high clinical suspicion, regardless of the results of serologic testing.
Keywords: Celiac disease, Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody, Histology, Marsh Grading
INTRODUCTION
According to Oslo's definition in 2013, “celiac disease is a chronic small intestinal immune-mediated enteropathy precipitated by exposure to dietary gluten in genetically predisposed individuals”.1 A definite diagnosis of celiac disease is based on histological changes, including intraepithelial lymphocytosis, crypt hyperplasia, and varying degrees of villous atrophy, graded according to a classification system proposed by Marsh (Marsh I-IIIc).2
Recently developed screening tests such as antiendomysial (AEA) and specially tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies have remarkably improved the diagnosis rate and screening programs for celiac disease. Broad utilization of these tests have helped indicate that celiac disease is more prevalent than what we previously thought1,2 and it is not an exclusively gastrointestinal disease and can be presented by a variety of clinical presentations.3-7
The tendency towards using non-invasive and less expensive methods for the diagnosis of celiac disease, especially in children, has prompted researchers to check if there is any correlation between tTG levels and mucosal damage and whether it has sufficient positive predictive value (PPV) to be solely used for the diagnosis of celiac disease. Recent evidence has shown that histological duodenal changes are correlated with tTG titers, 8-10 and proposed that duodenal biopsy can even be ignored in strongly positive tTG levels with some additional symptoms and history.11-13
The prevalence of celiac disease in Iran has been reported to be high (1 out of every 104 healthy subjects) and tTG test is wildly available and used in our setting for celiac disease screening. Therefore, using the serologic tests for diagnosis of celiac disease, at least in a specific group of patients, can be cost effective. We aimed to check whether degrees of mucosal damage to the small bowel correlate with clinical presentation and serum markers of Iranian patients with celiac disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
By reviewing records of the outpatient gastrointestinal clinic of Firoozgar Hospital, affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, documents of 159 patients who had been evaluated for celiac disease for any reason and had tTG titer and pathology reports of duodenum were enrolled. Endoscopy procedure and pathology review had been performed by experienced gastroenterologists and a single trained pathologist. Pathology reports from duodenal biopsies had been reported according to the modified Marsh classification. Anti-tTG IgA antibody along with serum IgA antibody were tested for all patients in our hospital's laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique by a commercially available kit (ORG540 A, ORGENTEC Diagnostica GmbH). Antibody levels above 10 Au/ml were considered positive, as per the manufacturers’ recommended tTG cut-off value. Laboratory data including complete blood count (CBC), liver, and thyroid function tests, ferritin, iron, TIBC, and calcium levels along with demographic data, clinical symptoms, and medical history of all the patients were extracted from their hospital records. If any information was missed, the patients were contacted by phone and were asked for any available data. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences and informed consent was obtained from all the patients after explaining the aims and protocol of the study. Statistical analysis was done using STATA package and p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
RESULTS
The study population included 59 (37.1%) men and 100 (62.9%) women. The mean±SD age of the patients was 35.6±15.2 years (range: 3.5-78 years). The demographic characteristics of the participants is shown in table 1.
Table 1. Frequency (%) and mean±SD of some descriptive characteristics of the patients in different Marsh staging .
| Variable | Modified Marsh Classification | VA+ Marsh>II | ||||||
| Normal & Marsh I | II | IIIa | IIIb | IIIc | ||||
| Frequency (%) | 13 (8.2) | 13 (8.2) | 55 (34.6) | 41 (25.8) | 37 (23.2) | 133 | ||
| Mean ±SD age (year) | 39.1 ± 17.5 | 35.9 ± 10.7 | 33.1 ± 16.9 | 36.5 ± 14.2 | 37.1 ± 14.4 | 35.2 (15.4) | ||
| Sex | Female | 10 (76.9) | 6 (46.2) | 34 (61.8) | 28 (68.3) | 22 (59.5) | 84 (63.2) | |
| Male | 3 (23.1) | 7 (53.8) | 21 (38.2) | 13 (31.7) | 15 (40.5) | 49 (36.8) | ||
| Anemia | 7 (53.8) | 8 (61.5) | 39 (70.9) | 29 (70.7) | 27 (73.0) | 98 (73.7) | ||
| Bloating | 3 (23.1) | 9 (69.2) | 35 (63.6) | 27 (65.8) | 25 (67.5) | 87 (65.4) | ||
| Abdominal pain | 5 (38.4) | 5 (38.4) | 31 (56.3) | 22 (53.6) | 24 (64.8) | 77 (57.8) | ||
| Diarrhea | 6 (46.1) | 4 (30.7) | 25 (45.4) | 22 (53.6) | 22 (59.4) | 69 (51.8) | ||
| Weight loss | 8 (61.5) | 4 (30.7) | 24 (43.6) | 18 (43.9) | 21 (56.7) | 63 (47.3) | ||
| Fatigue | 5 (38.4) | 3 (23.1) | 25 (45.4) | 9 (21.9) | 15 (40.5) | 49 (36.8) | ||
| Anorexia | 2 (15.3) | 4 (30.7) | 18 (33.3) | 7 (17.5) | 15 (40.5) | 40 (30.5) | ||
| Aphthous | 2 (15.3) | 4 (30.7) | 16 (29.1) | 8 (19.5) | 11 (29.7) | 35 (26.3) | ||
| Constipation | 3 (23.1) | 4 (30.7) | 13 (23.6) | 10 (24.3) | 10 (27.1) | 33 (24.8) | ||
| Osteoporosis | 0 | 0 | 8 (14.8) | 3 (7.5) | 5 (13.5) | 40 (30.5) | ||
As shown in table 1, the overall prevalence of anemia in patients with villous atrophy was 72.9% and anemia was the most common non-gastrointestinal (GI) sign. However we could not find any significant association between Marsh grading and hemoglobin levels (p for trend=0.55).
Although the frequency of most GI symptoms was higher in "Marsh IIIc" than other Marsh grading, there were no statistically significance differences in GI symptoms between different Marsh grading. Our results showed that while there was no significant differences in tTG levels in patients with villous atrophy, mean tTG titers were significantly lower in Marsh I and II grades than the other three grades (p for trend= 0.33 and 0.003 respectively). Figure 1 shows the increasing trend of mean tTG antibody titers from normal duodenal histology to complete atrophy.
Fig. 1 .
Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody titers in various levels of duodenal damage
Receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis was used to find a cut-off point for tTG antibody to discriminate A: absence (Marsh≤II) vs presence (Marsh IIIa-c) of villous atrophy and B: Marsh 0-I vs Marsh II_III. Figure 2 represents these two ROC curve graphs. While area under curve (AUC) for graph A was poor; AUC=0.67 (Std. error 0.068 and 95% CI 0.53-0.80); for graph B it is almost acceptable; AUC= 0.76 (Std. error 0.086 and 95% CI 0.59-0.93). Optimal cut-off points and corresponding sensitivity and specificities were calculated according to Youden index (J) =maximum {sensitivity – specificity - 1}.
Fig. 2 .
ROC curve analysis to find out cut-off point for tTG ab to discriminate two different standard A: Marsh <=1 vs Marsh=>2; B: Marsh <=2 vs Marsh IIIa-c.
DISSCUSSION
Our study showed that there was a correlation between tTG levels and degrees of duodenal damage. And tTG levels more than 9 times the manufacturers’ recommended cut-off value (tTGA≥90 U/ml) was about 97.2% sensitive for Marsh II and more duodenal damage. These results are in agreement with recent findings.10,12, 14
Prior to the adventure of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody, antigliadin antibody and endomysial antibody (EMA) have been used as serologic tests for diagnosis and screening of celiac disease. Although the specificity of EMA was very high but inadequate sensitivity of these tests resulted in some seronegative celiac cases, making them undesirable in clinical practice 15 TTG antibody was recognized by Dieterich and colleagues in 1997 as the major endomysial autoantigen and has been used as a sensitive and specific ELISA based test in celiac disease16-18 Following this identification, during the previous decade, studies have shown that tTG levels are different in various degrees of intestinal damage and there is a correlation between titers of tTG antibody and marsh grading.8-13,19,20
In 2005, when tTG had still not broadly been used in clinical settings, Barker and co-workers proposed that for subgroup of pediatric patients with celiac disease with very high tTG titers small-bowel biopsy was not necessary to make the diagnosis 21 Later Vivas and colleagues showed that duodenal biopsy might be avoided in children with strongly positive tTG antibody titers.11 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease have updated their guideline on the diagnosis of celiac disease after 20 years, and have mentioned that duodenal biopsy can be omitted from the diagnostic process of celiac disease in patients with anti-TG2 titers more than ten times the ULN and confirmatory positive EMA and HLA testing.13 This diagnostic approach has been confirmed by Mubarak and co-workers, that small intestinal biopsy can be avoided in symptomatic patients with tTGA≥100 U/ml12 Recently Allesio and colleagues, have concluded that, in both adults and children, there is a high probability of duodenal damage in patients with positive anti-tTG serology ≥ 7 times the cut-off, along with positive EMA, and under specific conditions duodenal biopsy could be avoided for the diagnosis of celiac disease10 Zanini and co-workers have even proposed that more than 5 times the upper limit of the normal level is 100% specific for duodenal atrophy and can be used as cut-off, which could help avoid biopsy in one third of adult patients with celiac disease14 As mentioned earlier, we found that tTG levels more than 90 U/ml were about 97.2% sensitive for Marsh II and more duodenal damage.
Moreover, it has also been shown that tTG antibody levels were significantly lower in patients who strictly adhered to a gluten free diet than those who did not22 Initial evaluation of celiac disease (CD) was based on a combination of positive CD-specific serological tests and histological findings in the intestinal biopsy. TTG antibody is used to initially screen suspected, including symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals for celiac disease and to monitor adherence and response to gluten free diet.23
Results of our study also showed that anemia was the most common sign and bloating, abdominal pain, and diarrhea were the first three common symptoms in patients with celiac. These results are in agreement with the results of a recent study.24
Most of the studied patients had Marsh IIIa to IIIc grades in pathology. The small number of patients with Marsh I and II grading was one of main limitations of our study. Furthermore, the EMA results of most of our patients were not available and we could not use these data in our analysis.
Considering the high prevalence of celiac disease in Iran, which has been reported to be 1:104 25 similar to western countries ,1, 26 it seems that tTG test can be applied for diagnosis of celiac disease, without duodenal biopsy, at least in patients with very high titers of serum antibody, between 5 to 10 folds than normal values. Confirmatory EMA and supporting clinical evidence should also be considered. In spite of this finding, small intestinal biopsy should always be considered in case of high clinical suspicion, regardless of the results of serologic testing.5
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.
Please cite this paper as:
Rahmati A, Shakeri R, Sohrabi MR, Alipour A, Boghratian AH, Setareh M, Zamani F. Correlation of Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody with Duodenal Histologic Marsh Grading. Middle East J Dig Dis 2014;6:131-6.
References
- 1.Kang JY, Kang AH, Green A, Gwee KA, Ho KY. Systematic review: worldwide variation in the frequency of coeliac disease and changes over time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:226–45. doi: 10.1111/apt.12373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hovell CJ, Collett JA, Vautier G, Cheng AJ, Sutanto E, Mallon DF. et al. , High prevalence of coeliac disease in a population-based study from Western Australia: a case for screening? . Med J Aust. 2001;175:247–50. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fasano A. Clinical presentation of celiac disease in the pediatric population. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:S68–73. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Farrell RJ, Kelly CP. Celiac sprue. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:180–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra010852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Green Green, PH PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1731–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shakeri R, Zamani F, Sotoudehmanesh R, Amiri A, Mohamadnejad M, Davatchi F. et al. Gluten sensitivity enteropathy in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zamani F, Mohamadnejad M, Shakeri R, Amiri A, Najafi S, Alimohamadi SM. et al. Gluten sensitive enteropathy in patients with iron deficiency anemia of unknown origin. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:7381–5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.7381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Donaldson MR, Firth SD, Wimpee H, Leiferman KM, Zone JJ, Horsley W. et al. Correlation of duodenal histology with tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibody levels in pediatric celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:567–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Donaldson MR, Book LS, Leiferman KM, Zone JJ, Neuhausen SL. et al. Strongly positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies are associated with Marsh 3 histopathology in adult and pediatric celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:256–60. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31802e70b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alessio MG, Tonutti E, Brusca I, Radice A, Licini L, Sonzogni A. et al. Correlation between IgA tissue transglutaminase antibody ratio and histological finding in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:44–9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182470249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vivas S, Ruiz de Morales JG, Riestra S, Arias L, Fuentes D, Alvarez N. et al. Duodenal biopsy may be avoided when high transglutaminase antibody titers are present. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4775–80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mubarak A, Wolters VM, Gmelig-Meyling FH, Ten Kate FJ, Houwen RH. Tissue transglutaminase levels above 100 U/mL and celiac disease: a prospective study. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:4399–403. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó IR, Mearin ML, Phillips A, Shamir R. et al. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:136–60. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821a23d0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zanini B, Magni A, Caselani F, Lanzarotto F, Carabellese N, Villanacci V. et al. High tissue-transglutaminase antibody level predicts small intestinal villous atrophy in adult patients at high risk of celiac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:280–5. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rostami K, Kerckhaert J, Tiemessen R, von Blomberg BM, Meijer JW, Mulder CJ. Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:888–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.983_f.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dieterich W, Ehnis T, Bauer M, Donner P, Volta U, Riecken EO. et al. Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease. Nat Med. 1997;3:797–801. doi: 10.1038/nm0797-797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schuppan D, Dieterich W, Ehnis T, Bauer M, Donner P, Volta U. et al. Identification of the autoantigen of celiac disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;859:121–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb11116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dieterich W, Laag E, Schöpper H, Volta U, Ferguson A, Gillett H. et al. Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:1317–21. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM. Prevalence of antitissue transglutaminase antibodies in different degrees of intestinal damage in celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36:219–21. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200303000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jatla M, Bokhari A, Bierly P, Russo P, Verma R. Anthropometric, serologic, and laboratory correlation with villous blunting in pediatric celiac disease: diabetics are different. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:622–6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181886047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barker CC, Mitton C, Jevon G, Mock T. Can tissue transglutaminase antibody titers replace small-bowel biopsy to diagnose celiac disease in select pediatric populations? Pediatrics 2005;115:1341-6. Can tissue transglutaminase antibody titers replace small-bowel biopsy to diagnose celiac disease in select pediatric populations? Pediatrics. 2005;115:1341–6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fabiani E, Catassi C. International Working Group . International Working, The serum IgA class anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis and follow up of coeliac diseaseResults of an international multi-centre studyInternational Working Group on Eu-tTG. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13:659–65. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200106000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hansson T, Dahlbom I, Rogberg S, Dannaeus A, Hopfl P, Gut H. et al. Recombinant human tissue transglutaminase for diagnosis and follow-up of childhood coeliac disease. Pediatr Res. 2002;51:700–5. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200206000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ehsani-Ardakani MJ, Rostami Nejad M, Villanacci V, Volta U, Manenti S. et al. Gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal presentation in patients with celiac disease. Arch Iran Med. 2013;16:78–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Akbari MR, Mohammadkhani A, Fakheri H, Javad Zahedi M, Shahbazkhani B, Nouraie M. et al. Screening of the adult population in Iran for coeliac disease: comparison of the tissue-transglutaminase antibody and anti-endomysial antibody tests. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:1181–6. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000224477.51428.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T, Not T, Colletti RB, Drago S. et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:286–92. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.3.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]