Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2014 Jul 31;2014:bcr2014205253. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-205253

Mandibular first molar with six root canals: a rare entity

Muhammad Hasan 1, Munawar Rahman 1, Najeeb Saad 1
PMCID: PMC4120025  PMID: 25082869

Abstract

Recently, there has been an ongoing trend of case reports that highlight the presence of more than four root canals in mandibular first molars. This tendency warns clinicians to be more prudent when dealing with mandibular first molars requiring endodontic treatment. Moreover, radiographic examination should be taken as a clue providing tool rather than as an absolute guide to anatomy and its associated aberrances. This case reports the successful non-surgical endodontic management of a mandibular first molar with six root canal systems with three canals in the mesial root and three in the distal root. The classification of root canal systems found in this case was Sert and Bayirli type XV in both the roots. After non-surgical endodontic treatment, the tooth was restored definitively with a resin composite core followed by porcelain fused to the metal crown. This case adds to the library of previously reported cases of mandibular first molars with six root canals and further emphasises on the importance of rare morphological deviations that may occur in the mandibular first molars.

Background

The therapeutic success of endodontics depends on several factors such as diagnosis, adequate access and application of skills towards the thorough cleaning, shaping and obturation of the root canal system.1–3 The endodontic system of human teeth comprises several variations which range from fins, deltas, isthmuses, anastomoses, cul-de-sacs, additional canals to additional roots.4–10 Therefore, to accomplish thorough cleaning and shaping, it is imperative to develop a good understanding of the root canal anatomy and associated deviations such as additional root canals, as evidence suggests that a missed root canal system may lead to post-treatment disease.11 12

The mandibular first molars normally have mesial and distal roots that harbour two mesial canals and one or two distal canals, respectively.13 One of the major variants of mandibular first molars is the radix entomolaris, which has an accessory third root present on its lingual side.14 Infrequently, there is an additional canal known as the middle mesial canal, located in the mesial root. This canal is located in the developmental groove present between the mesiolingual and mesiobuccal canals. The reported incidence of a middle mesial (MM) canal ranges from 1% to 15%.4 15 Another rare occurrence is the presence of three canals within the distal root. The third canal is referred to as the middle distal (MD) canal, which is located between the distolingual and distobuccal canals. The presence of three canals in the distal root is considered extremely rare and their reported incidence is 0.2–3%.5–7 11 14–19 However, the presence of six or more root canals is highly exceptional and such teeth are described in a small number of case reports only with their incidence being unknown20–25 (table 1). The purpose of this article is to report the successful endodontic treatment of a mandibular first molar exhibiting six root canal systems (three in the mesial root and three in the distal root).

Table 1.

Reported cases with six or more root canals

Author Case Number of canals Mesial root configuration Distal root configuration Additional root
Reeh25 23-year-old man, USA
Left mandibular first molar
7 4 canals
MB1, MB2, ML1, ML 2
3 canals, all separate
DB, MD, DL
Ghoddusi et al20 30-year-old man, Iran
Left mandibular first molar
6 2 canals
MB, ML
4 canals
DB1, DB2, MD, DL
Distolingual (RE)
Kontakiotis and Tzanetakis23 30-year-old man
Left mandibular first molar
6 4 mesial canals
Unspecified
2 distal canals
DB, DL
Aminsobhani et al22 30-year-old woman, Iran
Right mandibular first molar
6 4 mesial canals
Unspecified
2 distal canals
DB, DL
Ryan et al21 52-year-old woman, USA
Left mandibular first molar
6 3 canals, all separate
MB, MM, ML
3 canals, all separate
DB, MD, DL
Gupta et al24 38-year-old man, North India
Right mandibular first molar
6 3 canals
MB, MM: confluent
ML: independent
3 canals
DB, DM: confluent
DL: independent

RE, radix entomolaris

Case presentation

A 31-year-old man presented with symptoms of food stagnation and sensitivity to hot and cold stimuli in his lower right tooth. On examination, he had a deep carious lesion on the distal surface of the lower right mandibular first molar (#30; figure 1A). Periodontal probing depths were within normal limits. The tooth was −ve to percussion and the thermal tests were +ve with lingering sensitivity to cold suggesting a hyperaemic state of pulp. Periapical radiographic examination revealed that the carious lesion was in close proximity to the dental pulp. A diagnosis of pulpal hyperaemia secondary to a deep chronic carious lesion was established. The patient was given the option of root canal treatment or an extraction followed by a fixed prosthesis; however, the patient elected for endodontic treatment. The risks and benefits of the treatment were explained to the patient and a written consent was obtained before embarking on treatment.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preoperative radiograph (A), access cavity showing the middle mesial canal (black arrow) (B), working length radiograph (C), prepared canals before obturation (D).

Investigations

Pulp vitality testing, periapical radiograph.

Differential diagnosis

Hyperaemic pulp secondary to a deep chronic carious lesion.

Treatment

Treatment was initiated with the administration of local anaesthesia (4.4 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine) and rubber dam isolation. Under magnification (EyeMag Pro F, Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag, Germany), caries were removed from the cavity by a slow speed round carbide. A carious pulpal exposure was readily visible and haemorrhage could not be controlled confirming the hyperaemic state of the pulp. The pulp tissue was excavated from the pulp chamber and the orifices identified were mesiobuccal (MB), mesiolingual (ML), distolingual (DL) and distobuccal (DB). In addition, the presence of the mesiolingual canal was found to be distant to the mesiobuccal canal, which suggested that the mesial root is wider than normal. The developmental groove between the mesiolingual and mesiobuccal canals was further evaluated and an additional orifice was identified, present between the ML and MB canals, and located in close proximity to the MB canal (figure 1B).

The canal was identified as the MM canal and was successfully negotiated to full length with #8 and #10 H-type hand files. Working length was confirmed with the help of an electronic apex locator (Root ZX, J Morita Corp, Tustin, California, USA) and periapical radiographs (GXS-700 sensor, Gendex Dental System, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA) (figure 1C). It was observed that the middle mesial canal was merging with the primary mesiobuccal canal in its apical third. The canal system was classified as confluent-type.10 The working lengths of MB, MM, ML, DB and DL were 22, 21, 21.5, 20 and 20.5 mm, respectively. Following the determination of working lengths, pulpectomy was carried out and the access was sealed with a temporary filling (Cavit, Espe, Seefeld, Germany).

The patient returned to the dental clinic for his second visit after 1 week. All the canals were prepared using the protaper rotary system (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) with RC prep (Hawe Neos Dental, Bioggio, Switzerland) as the lubricant. At regular intervals, copious irrigation with 5% sodium hypochlorite was performed. The mesial and distal canals were finished with F1 and F2 protaper rotary files (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), respectively. A final rinse using 95% isopropyl alcohol was given and the canals were dried with paper points (figure 1D). Following disinfection of the gutta-percha points for 1 min in 5% sodium hypochlorite, the points were cleansed with alcohol to wipe away residual sodium hypochlorite and down-packed using Buchanan pluggers (Analytic Endodontics, Sybron Dental Specialties, Glendora, California, USA) to obtain an apical cork till 4 mm. Later, all canals were sequentially backfilled in increments using the Obtura II system (Obtura Spartan, USA). Sealapex (Kerr Manufacturing Co) was used as the root canal sealer (figure 2A, B). Post-obturation radiographs were obtained at distal angulations to evaluate the three-dimensional pack in all five canals (figure 2B). Following obturation, the tooth was restored with a temporary restoration (Cavit, Espe, Seefeld, Germany) and the patient was rescheduled to receive a coronal build-up.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cone fit radiograph (A), post-obturation radiograph showing five filled canals (B), following obturation, a remnant of gutta percha was observed in the orifice of an unidentified middle distal canal (black arrow; C), working length radiograph showing the middle distal canal (white arrow; D).

The patient returned to the dental clinic after a week's time for core build-up with mild symptoms of tenderness. On removing the temporary restoration, a small remnant of gutta percha was observed between the obturated distolingual and distobuccal canals (figure 2C). An evaluation of the area between the distal canals revealed a sixth canal system, the middle distal canal (MD), which initially went unnoticed. A working length radiograph confirmed the presence of this canal which was merging with the DB canal system in its apical third (confluent-type) (figure 2D).10 This canal had a length of 17.5 mm till its merging point with the DB canal. After shaping and cleaning, it was obturated and a temporary restoration was placed (Cavit, ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) (figure 3A). On the subsequent visit, the patient was asymptomatic and a core build-up with Smart Dentin Replacement (DENTSPLY DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was placed. A porcelain fused-to-metal crown was provided as the definitive restoration (figure 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Radiograph taken at mesial angulation demonstrating six obturated canals (A), Final restoration (B), 6-month follow-up (C).

Outcome and follow-up

At 6-month follow-up, the radiograph shows successful non-surgical root canal treatment (figure 3C). The patient is symptom free.

Discussion

This report highlights a rare case of a mandibular first molar with six root canals. Three canals were located in the mesial root, while three were found within the distal root. Both the roots had canals with type XV (3-2) configuration,18 that is, the middle mesial canal merged with the mesiobuccal canal in its apical third and exited through a common foramen, and the middle distal canal joined the distobuccal canal in its apical third having a mutual exit. The mesiolingual and distolingual canals were independent-type with separate orifices and apical portal of exits (figure 4). In this case report, the tooth was right-sided and a majority of the cases reported with additional roots and canals have described right-sided mandibular first molars.26–34

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Diagrammatic illustration of the mesial (A) and distal (B) root canals configuration.

In 1986, Quackenbush35 found that an additional root in the mandibular molars occurred unilaterally in up to 40% of the cases, predominantly on the right side. Moreover, these teeth are much likely to harbour an additional root canal due to the presence of an extra root. However, this correlation of right-sided mandibular molars to the presence of an additional root can simply be recognised as an observation. A case recently reported by Gupta et al24 discussed the presence of six root canals in a mandibular right first molar. In their case report, it was found that the middle mesial was confluent in its apical third with the mesiobuccal canal, whereas the middle distal had a mutual exit with the distolingual canal (table 1).

It has been reported in the literature that secondary dentin deposition occurs with age due to which partitions develop leading to progressive differentiation and separation of canals as well as formation of intercanal communications. The prevalence of such intercanal communications is usually high in the middle age group while being the lowest among young and old age groups.36 37

Every effort should be made to achieve a proper access cavity keeping the ‘law of concentricity’ in consideration.38 This would help the operator to follow the outline of the tooth and make adequate sized access cavity. Once the appropriately flared access cavity is finalised, it is recommended to sequentially irrigate the access cavity with 17% aqueous solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid followed by 95% ethanol to achieve adequate cleaning and drying before visual examination of the pulp cavity floor under magnification.39 The canal may initially not be visible due to the overlying internal triangular dentin which often conceals the orifices. The developmental grooves between the canals should be troughed and inspected for a potential sticky point. If a sticky point is located, it should be carefully ‘pecked’ towards progressive advancement following the same methods employed for negotiating fine or blocked canals.40 It is imperative to establish a straight line access into the canal as it reduces the chances of instrument separation.41 Once a glide path is established, the clinician should then proceed with a normal rotary sequence to complete the shaping and cleaning process.

There is an increasing trend of case reports that highlight mandibular first molars with anatomical aberrances such as accessory root canals. In order to be successful in endodontic treatment, clinicians should also be aware of root canal anatomy and its associated variances. A sceptical approach when searching for additional canals may prove beneficial. Moreover, several diagnostic methods are available that can facilitate detection of additional root canal systems. These measures include radiographs at various angulations,42 appropriate access cavity,43 good lighting and magnification using a dental operating microscope,44 careful visualisation, inspection of the chamber floor with an endodontic explorer, use of dyes, transillumination, white line test, red line test, bubble test, ultrasonics, chamber floor troughing and advanced imaging techniques such as cone beam CT (CBCT).45 It should be kept in mind that there are several limitations of conventional radiographs mentioned in the literature. In contrast, CBCT has proven to be a very successful modality as it is not subjected to a two-dimensional view, geometric distortion, image elongation or foreshortening, etc.46 CBCT has been shown to be a powerful tool for evaluating the extent of canal calcification and therefore helps in contributing to the proper sequence of the treatment.47 Therefore, an intraoperative evaluation with CBCT is highly recommended while managing such atypical cases. However, CBCT imaging was not performed for this case as it is presently not available at our centre.

Learning points.

  • Cone beam CT imaging should ideally be performed for teeth showing additional canals on access in order to avoid left out canals postoperatively.

  • Mandibular molars should be considered to have four or more canals unless proven otherwise.

  • Use of magnification and adequate flaring of access walls is helpful in providing improved visualisation of the pulp cavity floor.

Footnotes

Contributors: MH carried out the treatment on the patient mentioned in this case report and wrote the manuscript. In addition to this, all the coauthors mentioned have made a significant contribution to this case report with regard to the write-up and its correction.

Competing interests: None.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Ruddle CJ. Endodontic failures: the rationale and application of surgical retreatment. Rev Odontostomatol (Paris) 1988;17:511–69 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.West JD. Endodontic failures marked by kack of three-dimensional seal. Endod Rep 1987:9–12 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scianamblo MJ. Endodontic failures: the retreatment of previously endodontically treated teeth. Rev Odontostomatol (Paris) 1988;5:409.–3268980 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:589–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caliskan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetcioglu F, et al. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995;21:200–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, et al. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:359–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, et al. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2002;35:56–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wasti F, Shearer AC, Wilson NH. Root canal systems of the mandibular and maxillary first permanent molar teeth of south Asian Pakistanis. Int Endod J 2001;34:263–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cohen AS, Brown DC. Orofacial dental pain emergencies: endodontic diagnoses and management. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp, 8th edn. Boston, MA, USA: Mosby, 2002:31–75 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pomeranz HH, Eidelman DL, Goldberg MG. Treatment considerations of the middle mesial canal of mandibular first and second molars. J Endod 1981;7:565–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Christie WH, Peikoff MD, Fogel HM. Maxillary molars with two palatal roots: a retrospective clinical study. J Endod 1991;17:80–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cleghorn BM, Goodacre CJ, Christie WH. Morphology of teeth and their root canal systems. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC, eds. Ingle's endodontics, 6th edn Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: B C Decker Inc, 2008:151–220 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vertucci FJ, Haddix JE, Britto LR. Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. eds. Pathways of the pulp, 9th edn St Louis, MO, USA: Mosby Inc, 1998:148–232 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De Moor RJ, Deroose CA, Calberson FL. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molar: an endodontic challenge. Int Endod J 2004;37:789–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fabra-Campos H. Three canals in the mesial root of mandibular first permanent molars: a clinical study. Int Endod J 1989;22:39–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2009;42:775–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahmed HA, Abu-bakr NH, Yahia NA, et al. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population. Int Endod J 2007;40:766–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004;30:391–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sperber GH, Moreau JL. Study of the number of roots and canals in Senegalese first permanent mandibular molars. Int Endod J 1998;31:117–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ghoddusi J, Naghavi N, Zarei M, et al. Mandibular first molar with four distal canals. J Endod 2007;33:1481–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ryan JL, Bowles WR, Baisden MK, et al. Mandibular first molar with six separate canals. J Endod 2011;37:878–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aminsobhani M, Shokouhinejad N, Ghabraei S, et al. Retreatment of a 6-canalled mandibular first molar with four mesial canals: a case report. Iran Endod J 2010;5:138–40 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kontakiotis EG, Tzanetakis GN. Four canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar. A case report under the operating microscope. Aust Endod J 2007;33:84–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gupta S, Jaiswal S, Arora R. Endodontic management of permanent left first mandibular molar with six root canals. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3(Suppl 1):S130–3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reeh ES. Seven canals in a lower first molar. J Endod 1998;24:497–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chandra SS, Rajasekaran M, Shankar P, et al. Endodontic management of a mandibular first molar with three distal canals confirmed with the aid of spiral computerized tomography:a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e77–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beatty RG, Interian CM. A mandibular first molar with five canals: report of case. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111:769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Friedman S, Moshonov J, Stabholz A. Five root canals in a mandibular first molar. Dent Traumatol 1986;2:226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stroner WF, Remeikis NA, Carr GB. Mandibular first molar with three distal canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57:554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kottoor J, Sudha R, Velmurugan N. Middle distal canal of the mandibular first molar: a case report and literature review. Int Endod J 2010;43:714–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Mandibular first molar with three distal root canals. Int Endod J 2000;33:468–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jain S. Mandibular first molar with three distal canals. J Conserv Dent 2011;14:438–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lee SJ, Jang KH, Spangberg LS, et al. Three-dimensional visualization of a mandibular first molar with three distal roots using computer-aided rapid prototyping. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:668–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Barletta FB, Dotto SR, Reis Mde S, et al. Mandibular molar with five root canals. Aust Endod J 2008;34:129–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Quackenbush LE. Mandibular molar with three distal root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:48–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peiris HRD, Pitakotuwage TN, Takahashi M, et al. Root canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars at different ages. Int Endod J 2008;41:828–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iqbal M, Fillmore I. Preoperative predictors of number of root canals clinically detected in maxillary molar: a PennEndo database study. J Endod 2008;34: 413–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Krasner P, Rankow HJ. Anatomy of the pulp chamber floor. J Endod 2004;30:5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999;25:446–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ruddle CJ. Non-surgical endodontic retreatment. In: Cohen S, Burns RC. eds. Pathways of the pulp, 8th edn, St Louis, Mosby, 2002:875 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Monnan G, Smallwood ER, Gulabivala K. Effects of access cavity location and design on degree and distribution of instrumented root canal surface in maxillary anterior teeth. Int Endod J 2001;34:176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fava LR, Dummer PM. Periapical radiographic techniques during endodontic diagnosis and treatment. Int Endod J 1997;30:250–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Taylor GN. Techniiche per la preparazione e l'otturazione intracanalare. Clin Odontoiatr Nord Am 1988;20:566 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Coelho de Carvalho MC, Zuolo ML. Orifice locating with a microscope. J Endod 2000;26:532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vertucci FJ, Haddix JE. Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. eds. Pathways of the pulp, 9th edn St Louis, MO, USA: Mosby Inc, 2006:149–232 [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, et al. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J 2009;42:507–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ball RL, Barbizam JV, Cohenca N. Intraoperative endodontic applications of cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2013;39:548–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES