Skip to main content
Epilepsy Currents logoLink to Epilepsy Currents
. 2014 Jul-Aug;14(4):213–214. doi: 10.5698/1535-7597-14.4.213

Inhibitory Neurons Cut a New Path in Epilepsy Development

Bret N Smith
PMCID: PMC4120395  PMID: 25170323

Commentary

A Reorganized GABAergic Circuit in a Model of Epilepsy: Evidence from Optogenetic Labeling and Stimulation of Somatostatin Interneurons.

Peng A, Zhang N, Wei W, Huang CS, Cetina Y, Otis TS, Houser CR. J Neurosci 2013;33:14392–14405

Axonal sprouting of excitatory neurons is frequently observed in temporal lobe epilepsy, but the extent to which inhibitory interneurons undergo similar axonal reorganization remains unclear. The goal of this study was to determine whether somatostatin (SOM)-expressing neurons in stratum (s.) oriens of the hippocampus exhibit axonal sprouting beyond their normal territory and innervate granule cells of the dentate gyrus in a pilocarpine model of epilepsy. To obtain selective labeling of SOM-expressing neurons in s. oriens, a Cre recombinase-dependent construct for channel-rhodopsin2 fused to enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (ChR2-eYFP) was virally delivered to this region in SOM-Cre mice. In control mice, labeled axons were restricted primarily to s. lacunosum-moleculare. However, in pilocarpine-treated animals, a rich plexus of ChR2-eYFP-labeled fibers and boutons extended into the dentate molecular layer. Electron microscopy with immunogold labeling demonstrated labeled axon terminals that formed symmetric synapses on dendritic profiles in this region, consistent with innervation of granule cells. Patterned illumination of ChR2-labeled fibers in s. lacunosum-moleculare of CA1 and the dentate molecular layer elicited GABAergic inhibitory responses in dentate granule cells in pilocarpine-treated mice but not in controls. Similar optical stimulation in the dentate hilus evoked no significant responses in granule cells of either group of mice. These findings indicate that under pathological conditions, SOM/GABAergic neurons can undergo substantial axonal reorganization beyond their normal territory and establish aberrant synaptic connections. Such reorganized circuitry could contribute to functional deficits in inhibition in epilepsy, despite the presence of numerous GABAergic terminals in the region.

Simplistically, an excitatory–inhibitory imbalance in key brain areas supports an increased propensity for seizure generation. From a structural reorganization viewpoint, that concept translates to a loss of inhibition due to cell loss and altered responses to GABA, accompanied by an increase in excitation mediated by axon sprouting and synaptic reorganization among principal neurons. Excitatory axon sprouting and synaptic reorganization (exemplified by mossy fiber sprouting in the dentate gyrus) have been widely reported in animal models of acquired temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and in TLE patients. Concurrently, altered GABAergic inhibition and loss of select groups of GABAergic neurons in the hippocampal formation is also associated with epilepsy development. Reorganization of inhibitory synaptic circuits in epilepsy, however, has been less well characterized than for excitatory connections. Somatostatin-immunoreactive (SOM) GABAergic interneurons in the hilus represent one group of inhibitory interneurons that is particularly vulnerable to cell death associated with induction of TLE. These neurons normally innervate the distal dendrites of dentate gyrus granule cells, providing important recurrent inhibition. The loss of a significant portion of this critical class of cells during epileptogenesis may contribute to reduced seizure threshold. However, afferent synaptic drive to surviving hilar SOM neurons is reorganized and increased in animal models of TLE (1, 2), and the axons of hilar SOM neurons sprout and form new connections with granule cells, possibly reestablishing a portion of the normal inhibitory circuitry (3).

After noting that SOM immunolabeling in the dentate gyrus increased progressively after pilocarpine treatment, status epilepticus, and accompanying loss of SOM neurons in the hilus, Peng and colleagues investigated axon reorganization of SOM neurons originating in CA1 stratum oriens and found that their axons arborized aberrantly in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. These neurons are relatively spared in epilepsy development, and their axons do not normally invade the dentate gyrus. Using sophisticated labeling methods targeted to the stratum oriens in SOM-Cre transgenic mice, axon terminals of stratum oriens SOM neurons in pilocarpine-treated, but not control mice, were found to form symmetric (inhibitory) synaptic contacts with granule cell dendrites and dendritic spines. Normally, hilar SOM neurons make synapses on granule cell dendrites, near terminations of excitatory perforant path axons. The hilar SOM neurons are depleted in this model, but newly formed synapses from stratum oriens SOM neurons were often located near asymmetrical (excitatory) synapses on dendritic spines, hinting that the new synapses took the place of those lost when the hilar cells were killed. Unlike the axon reorganization observed in surviving hilar SOM cells—which occurs in the same domain as the normal projection—the axonal reorganization of stratum oriens SOM cells extended beyond their normal termination regions, forming an entirely new structural connection.

Functional connectivity of sprouted axons with granule cells was also established. The viral construct used to identify SOM neurons expressed channelrhodopsin, a cation channel that gets inserted into the membrane of the infected neuron, allowing for optogenetic activation of transfected SOM cells selectively. Electrophysiological recordings in pilocarpine-treated mice revealed optogenetically activated inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in granule cells after stimulation of stratum oriens SOM neurons, consistent with the formation of symmetric, inhibitory synapses by the sprouted axons. Identification of functional synaptic reorganization in local inhibitory circuitry during epileptogenesis has suffered from difficulties in specifically identifying and activating newly formed connections. Peng and colleagues’ use of optogenetic technology overcame this barrier and defined a new, functional inhibitory synaptic connection that forms during the process of epileptogenesis.

Reduced GABA cell density is often associated with increased network excitability. Coupled with axon sprouting and synaptic reorganization among principal neurons, decreased inhibition due to cell death has been incriminated as a contributor to the development of spontaneous seizures. Positive seizure control outcomes in patients treated medically to enhance surviving GABA connections are consistent with the critical nature of intact GABAergic circuitry in regulating brain activity. Recent reports suggesting that replacing specific types of GABA cells that are “lost” during epileptogenesis might abrogate seizure activity in mice (4), consistent with the hypothesis that diminished endogenous inhibition contributes to the expression of seizures. Emerging evidence also suggests that surviving hilar SOM neurons are morphologically and functionally altered in a manner that implies an endogenous attempt by the system to restabilize functional inhibition in key circuits of seizure initiation and propagation. These features of reorganized, surviving inhibitory circuitry imply that “normal” inhibitory circuits are somehow being augmented. Provocative as it sounds, one implication of reorganized inhibitory circuitry is that it serves a restorative function, operating to rebalance inhibitory tone.

However, the functional implications of the re-innervation of granule cells from stratum oriens are difficult to appreciate. The new connections seem unlikely to be effectively activated by the same stimuli that trigger recurrent inhibition from hilar SOM neurons (e.g., granule cell activity), so normal inhibitory feedback is probably not established by the new circuit. Perhaps the additional GABA being released is sufficient to maintain a level of synaptic inhibition adequate to suppress some forms of excessive activity, even if the functional feedback duties of the circuit are altered or not intact. Conversely, it was proposed long ago that sprouted GABAergic axons might help to synchronize neural activity (5), and certain types of developmental- and state-dependent cognitive behaviors may be mediated by cortical circuits that rely on this mechanism (6, 7). Inhibitory neurons with enhanced incoming and outgoing connectivity may act as “hubs” to promote hyperexcitability under certain conditions (8). Excessive inhibitory input to distal dendrites may even be more likely to result in paradoxical depolarization (9). The behavioral effect on seizures of optogenetically stimulating this new connection in vivo was not tested, but outcomes of that experimental manipulation might address this issue in the future.

While the concept of synaptic imbalance underpinning TLE seems intuitive and even attractive, a more pragmatic view indicates that epileptogenesis resulting in TLE is probably more complex than a simple change in the balance of inhibition and excitation. The findings of Peng and colleagues demonstrating the formation of entirely new inhibitory connections in the hippocampal formation highlights the variety and complexity of epilepsy-related synaptic reorganization in the temporal lobe, and they also underscore the need to conceptualize TLE development and treatment in a way that takes this complexity into account.

Footnotes

Editor's Note: Authors have a Conflict of Interest disclosure which is posted under the Supplemental Materials (207.7KB, docx) link.

References

  • 1.Halabisky B, Parada I, Buckmaster PS, Prince DA. Excitatory input onto hilar somatostatin interneurons is increased in a chronic model of epilepsy. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104:2214–2223. doi: 10.1152/jn.00147.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hunt RF, Scheff SW, Smith BN. Synaptic reorganization of inhibitory hilar interneuron circuitry after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6880–6890. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0032-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang W, Yamawaki R, Wen X, Uhl J, Diaz J, Prince DA, Buckmaster PS. Surviving hilar somatostatin interneurons enlarge, sprout axons, and form new synapses with granule cells in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2009;9:14247–14256. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3842-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hunt RF, Girskis KM, Rubenstein JL, Alvarez-Buylla A, Baraban SC. GABA progenitors grafted into the adult epileptic brain control seizures and abnormal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:692–697. doi: 10.1038/nn.3392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Babb TL, Pretorius JK, Kupfer WR, Crandall PH. Glutamate decarboxylase-immunoreactive neurons are preserved in human epileptic hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1989;9:2562–2574. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-07-02562.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bartos M, Vida I, Jonas P. Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:45–56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Quilichini PP, Le Van Quyen M, Ivanov A, Turner DA, Carabalona A, Gozlan H, Esclapez M, Bernard C. Hub GABA neurons mediate gamma-frequency oscillations at ictal-like event onset in the immature hippocampus. Neuron. 2012;74:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morgan RJ, Soltesz I. Nonrandom connectivity of the epileptic dentate gyrus predicts a major role for neuronal hubs in seizures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:6179–6184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801372105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Staley KJ, Soldo BL, Proctor WR. Ionic mechanisms of neuronal excitation by inhibitory GABAA receptors. Science. 1995;269:977–981. doi: 10.1126/science.7638623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epilepsy Currents are provided here courtesy of American Epilepsy Society

RESOURCES