Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), characterized by sudden onset and rapid progression, remains the most significant gastrointestinal disorder among premature infants. In seeking a predictive biomarker, we found intestinal fatty acid binding protein, an indicator of enterocyte damage, was substantially increased within three and seven days before the diagnosis of NEC.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common gastrointestinal emergency in premature infants and the leading cause of aberrant growth and neurodevelopment among surviving preterm infants(1-4). NEC is especially problematic because of its often sudden onset and rapid progression, making it difficult to anticipate, diagnose, and treat. Along with targeting patterns of intestinal colonization and microbial signatures(5-7), an early intestinal injury-specific biomarker of NEC is sought. We investigated intestinal fatty acid binding protein (iFABP) as a measure of enterocyte damage and candidate-biomarker of NEC.
iFABP is a 15-kDa cytoplasmic protein located in small intestinal enterocytes involved in the uptake and transport of polar lipids such as fatty acids from the small-bowel lumen(8, 9). iFABP has been associated with injury to the intestinal mucosa(10) and injury common to inflammatory bowel diseases(11), including NEC(12-17). iFABP can be measured in serum(13) and urine(12, 16, 17). This study assessed the early predictive relationship between urinary iFABP and NEC among very low gestational age infants.
Methods
Among a cohort of babies born prior to 29 weeks’ gestation admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and enrolled in a study of lung biology (HL 67669), 165 of 1178 neonates born between 1997 and 2009 were diagnosed with NEC. Of these infants, 70 had urine samples available within seven days prior to NEC diagnosis. Disease severity was assessed using Bell Staging criteria(18), and infants diagnosed with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) were excluded from this study. Matching by gestational age at birth (<27 weeks or 27 to 29 weeks), we selected as a control the next baby born who did not have NEC and had a urine sample within seven days preceding the case’s postnatal day of NEC diagnosis. Time of diagnosis was based on documentation of the attending neonatologist’s diagnosis and initiation of treatment for NEC. Urine samples were collected from a cotton ball placed within the infant’s diaper and stored at −80°C until analysis; clinical data were collected from medical records.
iFABP was measured from urine vy ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). For initial screening, all samples were diluted 10-fold in a bovine serum albumin-based diluent (R&D Systems) and those showing levels below or above the assay detection range were repeatedly tested undiluted or up to 100-fold dilution, respectively, to acquire accurate measurements. All measurements were performed in duplicate. A split quality control pool prepared from urine samples was tested on each plate showing inter-plate variation of 7.7%. Intra-plate variation of repeated measurements of the quality control pool was <9% [3.3% ±3%]. Total protein concentrations were determined by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) for iFABP normalization to mg total protein. These samples were screened at 20-fold dilution and repeated undiluted or up to 200-fold dilution, respectively.
Normality was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test. Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U was used to analyze continuous variables, Chi-square test for categorical variables, Spearman Rank for correlation, and logistic regression for the relationship between iFABP and NEC while controlling for potential confounders. Cut-off iFABP values for predicting NEC were investigated with receiving operating characteristic analysis. SAS 9.3 (Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analyses.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics of NEC cases and controls were similar (Table). iFABP was not correlated with total protein levels (rs=0.10) and thus is reported without adjustment. Median iFABP urine concentrations in 70 case-control pairs within seven days of NEC onset (n=140; Table and Figure, A), were higher among cases than controls (p<0.001). When stratified by Bell Stage, median iFABP was higher among cases and statistically significant in Bell Stages I and III (p<0.005). Analyses were performed using a subset of 98 infants (49 case-control pairs) who had urine samples available within three days of NEC diagnosis. Among these, median iFABP was higher among cases (p<0.001), and was significant across all Bell Stages (p<0.05; Table and Figure, B).
Table 1.
| NEC Stage I (n=18 pairs) | NEC Stage II (n=21 pairs) | NEC Stage III (n=31 pairs) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | p | Cases | Controls | p | Cases | Controls | p | |
| Gestational Age* | 26.0 [25.0-27.7] |
26.6 [25.0-27.3] |
0.96 | 27.4 [26.2-28.4] |
27.3 [26.3-28.0] |
0.63 | 25.0 [24.43-26.3] |
26.0 [24.57-26.71] |
0.12 |
| Birth Weight* | 783 [680-975] |
905 [795-1020] |
0.39 | 1035 [830-1170] |
900 [790-1090] |
0.43 | 755 [620-885] |
890 [660-940] |
0.12 |
| Male Sex** | 7 (38.9) | 11 (61.1) | 0.18 | 14 (66.7) | 14 (66.7) | 1.0 | 22 (71.0) | 13 (41.9) | 0.02 |
| Cesarean Birth** | 10 (55.6) | 11 (61.1) | 0.74 | 14 (66.7) | 18 (85.7) | 0.15 | 20 (64.5) | 23 (74.2) | 0.41 |
| Volume of First Feeding* |
1.3 (1-1.7) | 1.4 (1-1.9) | 0.75 | 2 (1.1-2) | 1.6 (1-2) | 0.5 | 1.1 (1-1.4) | 1 (1-1.5) | 0.73 |
| Human Milk as First Feeding* |
9 [52.9] | 13 [72.2] | 0.24 | 5 [27.8] | 12 [57.1] | 0.07 | 20 [74.1] | 21 [67.7] | 0.6 |
| Proportion of Human Milk Fed Prior to NEC Diagnosis** |
0.63 (0-1) | 1(0-1) | 0.13 | 0.42 (0-0.96) |
0.85 (0.05-0.99) |
0.21 | 0.32 (0-1) | 0.63 (0-1) | 0.91 |
| Growth Restriction** | 3 (16.7) | 1 (5.6) | 0.60 | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19.0) | 0.66 | 6 (19.4) | 5 (16.1) | 0.74 |
| Antenatal Steroids** | 17 (94.4) | 14 (77.8) | 0.34 | 20 (95.2) | 18 (85.7) | 0.61 | 29 (93.6) | 29 (93.6) | 1.00 |
| 5 minute Apgar**
0-4 5-7 8-10 |
3 (16.7) 9 (50.0) 6 (33.3) |
1 (5.6) 9 (50.0) 8 (44.4) |
0.58 |
2 (9.5) 10 (47.6) 9 (42.9) |
1 (4.8) 12 (57.1) 8 (38.1) |
0.81 |
5 (16.1) 18 (58.1) 8 (25.8) |
3 (9.7) 17 (54.8) 11 (35.5) |
0.59 |
| iFABP (ng/mL) within 7 days of NEC* |
15.4 [6.0-42.8] |
3.8 [2.1-7.5] |
0.005 | 17.8 [10.4-32.2] |
10.2 [3.3-30.1] |
0.125 | 15.9 [7.7-39.0] |
2.9 [1.6-8.9] |
<0.001 |
| NEC Stage I (n=14 pairs) | NEC Stage II (n=16 pairs) | NEC Stage III (n=19 pairs) | |||||||
| iFABP (ng/mL) within 3 days of NEC* |
18.4 [6.0-64.1] |
4.0 [2.1-7.5] |
0.006 | 21.8 [12.9-52.2] |
8.7 [2.5-25.4] |
0.036 | 16.7 [7.8-91.5] |
2.4 [1.6-8.2] |
<0.001 |
Median [IQR] reported
Number (%)
Figure 1.
Urinary iFABP and NEC prior to disease onset.
Median iFABP within seven days prior to NEC onset.
Median iFABP within three days prior to NEC onset.
ROC Curve within seven days prior to NEC onset.
ROC Curve within three days prior to NEC onset.
Odds ratios (OR) for a 10-fold change in iFABP were 4.14, 95% CI [2.20, 7.81] (p<0.001) and 6.84, 95% CI [2.87, 16.31] (p<0.001) for seven-day and three-day analysis, respectively. ROC curves (Figure, C and D) illustrated that within seven days of NEC, iFABP>13.3 ng/mL would predict NEC with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity (c-statistic=0.74), and within three days, iFABP>13.9 ng/mL was found to be 65% sensitive and 84% specific (c-statistic=0.80). Including mode of delivery, human milk exposure, growth restriction, antenatal steroids, and 5-minute Apgar score had minimal impact on the regression coefficient (iFABP OR 4.73 [2.44, 9.15] in the seven-day analysis) and the ROC results.
Discussion
Urinary iFABP may be a useful predictor of NEC within a week preceding diagnosis and is more strongly predictive within three days of NEC diagnosis. This relationship is most evident among infants with NEC stages I and III. The smaller difference in iFABP between NEC stage II cases and controls may be explained by the fact that infant pairs in this analysis were overall older at the time of measurement (median postnatal day of diagnosis was 17 compared with day 11 and 10 for stage I and III, respectively). Further analysis of iFABP based on gestational and postnatal age, reflecting both gastrointestinal maturity and clinical factors such as feeding, is needed for understanding its value as a measure of gastrointestinal function and injury in this patient population.
The findings reported here provide further evidence of the association between elevated iFABP and NEC previously observed in smaller studies(12,13,15,17), suggesting that iFABP may be useful as a diagnostic biomarker for earlier identification of NEC. If combined with measures of intestinal inflammation (e.g. fecal calprotecin), NEC may be detected with even greater sensitivity and specificity (15). Future work that integrates multiple measures of intestinal colonization and inflammation promises to change how we care for preterm infants so that we may prevent this devastating disease.
Acknowledgments
Supported by Specialized Center of Research in Lung Biology (HL 67669), Biochemical Predictors of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (K23 NR011320 to K.G.), American Nurses Foundation (2008-112 to K.G.), and the Harvard Newborn Medicine Clinical and Translational Research Consortium. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Schulzke S, Deshpande G, Patole S. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of very low-birth-weight infants with necrotizing enterocolitis: A systematic review of observational studies. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2007;16:583–90. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.6.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rees CM, Pierro A, Eaton S. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonates with medically and surgically treated necrotizing enterocolitis. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2007;92:F193–F8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.099929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neu J, Walker W. Necrotizing Enterocolitis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;364:255–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1005408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Stoll BJ, Vohr BR, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, et al. Neurodevelopmental and Growth Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants After Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Pediatrics. 2005;115:696–703. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mai V, Young CM, Ukhanova M, Wang X, Sun Y, Casella G, et al. Fecal microbiota in premature infants prior to necrotizing enterocolitis. PloS One. 2011;6:e20647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Normann E, Fahlen A, Engstrand L, Lilja HE. Intestinal microbial profiles in extremely preterm infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis. Acta paediatrica. 2013;102:129–36. doi: 10.1111/apa.12059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang Y, Hoenig JD, Malin KJ, Qamar S, Petrof EO, Sun J, et al. 16S rRNA gene-based analysis of fecal microbiota from preterm infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis. ISME. 2009;3:944–54. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ockner RK, Manning JA. Fatty acid-binding protein in small intestine. Identification, isolation, and evidence for its role in cellular fatty acid transport. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1974;54:326–38. doi: 10.1172/JCI107768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cistola DP, Kim K, Rogl H, Frieden C. Fatty acid interactions with a helix-less variant of intestinal fatty acid-binding protein. Biochemistry. 1996;35:7559–65. doi: 10.1021/bi952912x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lieberman JM, Sacchettini J, Marks C, Marks WH. Human intestinal fatty acid binding protein: report of an assay with studies in normal volunteers and intestinal ischemia. Surgery. 1997;121:335–42. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90363-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wiercinska-Drapalo A, Jaroszewicz J, Siwak E, Pogorzelska J, Prokopowicz D. Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) as a possible biomarker of ileitis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Regulatory peptides. 2008;147:25–8. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Evennett NJ, Hall NJ, Pierro A, Eaton S. Urinary intestinal fatty acid-binding protein concentration predicts extent of disease in necrotizing enterocolitis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2010;45:735–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aydemir C, Dilli D, Oguz SS, Ulu HO, Uras N, Erdeve O, et al. Serum intestinal fatty acid binding protein level for early diagnosis and prediction of severity of necrotizing enterocolitis. Early Hum Dev. 2011;87:659–61. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Edelson MB, Sonnino RE, Bagwell CE, Lieberman JM, Marks WH, Rozycki HJ. Plasma intestinal fatty acid binding protein in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis: a pilot study. Journal of pediatric surgery. 1999;34:1453–7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90102-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reisinger KW, Van der Zee DC, Brouwers HA, Kramer BW, van Heurn LW, Buurman WA, et al. Noninvasive measurement of fecal calprotectin and serum amyloid A combined with intestinal fatty acid-binding protein in necrotizing enterocolitis. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2012;47:1640–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Derikx JP, Evennett NJ, Degraeuwe PL, Mulder TL, van Bijnen AA, van Heurn LW, et al. Urine based detection of intestinal mucosal cell damage in neonates with suspected necrotising enterocolitis. Gut. 2007;56:1473–5. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.128934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thuijls G, Derikx JP, van Wijck K, Zimmermann LJ, Degraeuwe PL, Mulder TL, et al. Non-invasive markers for early diagnosis and determination of the severity of necrotizing enterocolitis. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251:1174–80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d778c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee JS, Polin RA. Treatment and prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis. Seminars in Neonatology. 2003;8:449–59. doi: 10.1016/S1084-2756(03)00123-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

