Skip to main content
Health Promotion Perspectives logoLink to Health Promotion Perspectives
. 2014 Jul 12;4(1):27–34. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2014.004

Assessing Readiness to Lose Weight among Obese Women Attending the Nutrition Clinic

Fatemeh Ghannadiasl 1, Reza Mahdavi 2,*, Mohammad AsghariJafarabadi 3
PMCID: PMC4122041  PMID: 25097834

Abstract

Background: Assessing individual’s readiness to change and targeting the inter­vention to the level of readiness may improve successful weight loss rates. This study aimed to assess readiness for weight loss in obese women using the trans theoretical model.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 90 volunteer apparently healthy obese women, in Ardabil, Iran. Participants completed the translated and validated University of Rhode Island Change Assessment questionnaire in their first visit. Subjects were categorized into one of the stages of change based on the highest of four z-transformed scale scores. The readiness to change score was calculated.

Results: More than half of the participants were in early stages of weight loss and 24.5% were in the action stage. The readiness score in the precontemplation stage was significantly lower than the other stages, but no significant difference was observed among the contemplation, action and maintenance stages. The significant correlation was observed between the stages of change and waist-to-hip ratio (r=0.33, P<0.05).

Conclusion: Obese women attending the nutrition clinic are in different stages to change for weight loss. Understanding person specific stages of change ori­entates the dietitian to use the most appropriate counseling strategies. Hence the stages and readiness to change should be considered before implementing any intervention in clinical settings for optimal outcomes.

Keywords: Obese women, Weight loss, Readiness to change

Introduction

Obesity as a public health problem is of much importance globally. Overall, 33.0% of the world’s adult population in 2005 were overweight or obese.1 Moreover, if recent trends continue, by 2030 up to 57.8% of the world’s adult population could be either overweight or obese.1 In Iran, as a developing country, the overall prevalence of obesity for adults (>18 years) has been reported 21.5% with 27.3% for women and 13.7% for men.2 The obesity is associated with significant health risks3 and body image dissatisfaction.4 Obese women experience greater weight-related stigma and discrimination.5 Therefore dieting in females is more common than male counterparts.6

In general, previous studies have reported that few individuals, approximately 20%,7 are successful in long-term weight loss.8,9 The individual’s readiness to change is increasingly cited as an important variable for predicting long-term success of weight management.10 Readiness to change refers to the degree which an individual is motivated to change problematic behaviors and implies willingness or behavioral readiness to initiate behavior change.11 Occasionally, persons who visit a dietitian may seem to be seeking treatment for obesity, but they may not have accepted the necessity for treatment. Some such individuals may have been forced into visiting the dietitian by their family and friends, or based on other factors. Brownell has labeled such individuals as “not ready” for treatment.12

The central dimension of the transtheoretical model is the stages of change (SOC) that reflects a person’s readiness to change behavior or the engagement in behavior change, at a given point in time.13 The first two stages represent people who are least ready to change (precontemplation) or are ambivalent about change (contemplation); the third stage represents people who are preparing to change in the next month (preparation); the last two stages represent activity behavior change if the change is recent (action), or sustained behavior change if the change has been maintained for more than 6 months (maintenance).14 Indeed TTM highlights the need to assess the individual’s readiness to change to determine the most appropriate intervention.11

The transtheoretical model is a widely supported model for dietary behaviors such as reducing fat and increasing fruit and vegetable intake.15-17 Recently, there has been growing interest in applying the TTM to weight management in overweight and obese individuals.18-21 Since it has not exclusively been applied among apparently healthy obese women attending nutrition clinics, the present study was conducted to determine the readiness for weight loss and to investigate the association between the stages of change and background variables among them.

Materials and Methods

Participants & Procedures

In this cross-sectional study, 90 volunteer obese women were recruited from the nutrition clinic in Ardabil City, in the northwest of Iran from September to November 2012. The participants were apparently healthy, non-pregnant, non-lactating and non-menopausal obese women, aged 18-50 years and body mass index ranged from 30 to 40 kg/m² from urban areas. They had no participation in weight loss programs including formal or self imposed diet and activity program in the previous 6 months. All had at least a high school education or above.

Written information including the purpose of the study and security of personal information was given to each participant. Written informed consent document was obtained from the subjects. The protocol of the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Measures

The framework used in this study was the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) questionnaire. The URICA was developed with the intention that it would be sensible to readiness for change and apply to a broad range of problems.22 The URICA consists of 32 items representing the four stages of change in the TTM, with 8 items for each of the precontemplation, contemplation, action and maintenance subscales. URICA items are rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and subscale sums were averaged across items so that subscale scores are presented as means ranging from 1 to 5. The internal consistency of the URICA is good with coefficient alphas from 0.79 to 0.89 for the four subscales. Construct validity of the URICA has been supported through factor analysis and cluster analyses indicating that the stages are associated with different behavioral profiles.23 In our study, initially the original University of Rhode Island Change Assessment questionnaire was translated from English into Persian. Then two bilingual experts who read and spoke both Persian and English languages evaluated the translated URICA for technical issues and wordings. Based on the experts’ view, sentences recognized as weakly worded or unclear were rewritten by the researcher. Moreover, the back translation technique was used in order to attain a culturally equivalent instrument. During the processes of back translation, the equivalence of Persian and English version was ensured. The necessary modifications were applied to ensure the understandability of the questionnaire. Later, the pilot study was conducted to test the level of internal consistency reliability of the translated and modified questionnaire. During pilot study, 10 subjects with the same inclusion criteria as for main study completed the modified URICA questionnaire twice, once at baseline and again approximately 10 days later, to establish test-retest reliability. We categorized subjects as falling primarily into one of the four stages. The method used was as follows: Participants’ scores on each of the four stages of change scales were standardized by conversion to z scores. Each participant was then assigned to a category corresponding to the highest of her four z-transformed scale scores. The readiness to change score was calculated by subtracting the precontemplation score from the sum of the contemplation, action and maintenance scores.24 In a pilot study, test–retest reliability was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), which measures the correlation between subscores obtained by the same person on two separate occasions. Test–retest reliability was considered to be good if the ICC was greater than 0.75, moderate if between 0.50 and 0.75, and poor if less than 0.50.25 The test-retest reliability of the URICA subscales is presented in Table 1. These values were similar to those obtained by other researchers.23 Coefficient for each subscale higher than 0.7 and ICC greater than 0.6 were considered acceptable. Therefore the results showed a reliability of the questionnaire.

Table1. Summary statistics, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the URICA subscales .

URICA scale Test Mean± SD Re-test Mean± SD ICC (95% CI) Cronbach’s α
Precontemplation 3.71±0.94 3.70±0.62 0.68(0.35-0.89) 0.74
Contemplation 3.98±0.37 4.05±0.44 0.84(0.66-0.95) 0.88
Action 2.21±0.51 1.94±0.48 0.62(0.27-0.87) 0.72
Maintenance 4.34±0.50 4.32±0.51 0.82(0.59-0.91) 0.84

In the main study, subjects completed the URICA and demographic questionnaires before the initiation of diet therapy. The demographic questionnaire included variables such as age, marital status, age at onset of obesity, history of dieting and expected weight loss. Participants’ weight and height were measured in light clothing and without shoes using a balanced scale (SECA model 224, SECA Corp., Hamburg, Germany). The circumferences of waist and hip were measured according to the WHO protocol using a non-stretchable tape without imposing any pressure to the body surface. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest. Hip circumference measurement was taken around the widest portion of the buttocks. Abdominal obesity was defined as a waist circumference of >88 cm in women based on criteria for the third report of the national cholesterol education program.26 The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by squared height (m2) of each participant. The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by dividing the waist circumference to the hip circumference.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 13.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were checked for normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, means and standard deviations, were computed for each of the precontemplation, contemplation, action and maintenance subscales. Chi-square test and one-way analyses of variance were performed to determine differences in stages of change for categorical and continuous variables respectively. When appropriate, Tukey’s Post hoc tests were used to examine pairwise significance differences between stages. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between stages of change and background variables. The significance level for all analyses was set at P > 0.05.

Results

Descriptive characteristics of the studied participants are presented in table 2. All subjects had abdominal obesity based on waist circumference. The majority of the women reported a history of one or more dieting (77.8%) and was married (72.2%).

Table 2. Descriptive characteristics of obese women attending the nutrition clinic (n=90) .

Variable Mean ± SD
Age (yr) 27.71 ± 7.21
Weight (kg) 85.05 ± 11.72
Height (cm) 159.65 ± 6.27
BMI (kg/m²) 33.25 ± 3.02
Waist circumference (cm) 105.67 ± 10.64
WHR 0.91 ± 0.06
Age at onset of obesity (yr) 18.04 ± 5.79
Expected weight loss (kg) 19.59±8.84

The classification of women, according to the stages of change for weight loss indicated that 30.0%, 23.3%, 24.5% and 22.2% were in the precontemplation, contemplation, action and maintenance stages, respectively. In this study, the mean readiness score was 9.22(SD 1.13). A statistical significant difference was observed between the readiness score and stages of change (F(3,86)=30.43, P<0.001).

Tukey’s Post hoc tests showed that women in the precontemplation stage had a lower readiness score than women in the other stages. No significant difference was observed among the contemplation, action and maintenance stages.

Table 3 shows characteristics of the study population based on the stages of change. Although, the most studied participants experienced different methods for weight loss, no statistical significant difference was observed between women in different stages of change as regard previous attempts to lose weight (χ²3=0.76, P=0.86).

Table 3. Characteristics of obese women attending the nutrition clinic based on the stages of change (n=90) .

Variable Precontemplation n=27 Contemplation n=21 Action n=22 Maintenance n=20 Test of significance (P value)
Readiness score 7.97±0.84** 9.56±0.91 9.62±0.79 10.01±0.54 F(3, 86)=30.43* (<0.001)
BMI (kg/m2) 33.35±2.93 33.10±2.45 33.65±3.34 32.82±3.43 F(3, 86)=0.28 (0.83)
WHR 0.87±0.06** 0.93±0.06 0.93±0.06 0.91±0.06 F(3, 86)=3.60* (<0.05)
Waist circumference(cm) 102.88±10.81 105.98±8.43 108.52±8.94 105.85±13.691 F(3, 86)=1.13 (0.34)
Age at onset of obesity(years) 18.63±6.51 17.95±5.51 17.93±6.10 17.39±4.92 F(3, 86)=0.16 (0.92)
Previous attempts to lose weight (n (%))
Yes 22(24.4%) 15(16.6%) 17(18.9%) 16(17.8%) χ ²3=0.76 (0.86)
No 5(5.6%) 6(6.7%) 5(5.6%) 4(4.4%)
Expected weight loss(kg) 19.13±9.42 20.05±7.95 19.31±8.33 20.02±10.02 F(3, 86)=0.06 (0.98)

*Analysis of variance tests for difference between means were significant. /**Tukey’s Post hoc tests indicated a significant difference between the precontemplation with the contemplation, action and maintenance stages at the P<0.05 level.

Besides, no significant differences were observed between the stages of change in relation to age at onset of obesity, body mass index and waist circumference. There was a significant difference in waist to hip ratio between stages of change (F(3,86)=3.60, P<0.05). Further Tukey’s Post hoc tests showed that women in the precontemplation stage had lower waist to hip ratio than women in the other stages.

Discussion

Determining subject’s readiness for weight loss is essential for successful weight loss.27-29 In this study, more than half of the studied participants were in early stages of change for weight loss in their first visit to the nutrition clinic. In Hawkins et al. study of 142 rural overweight or obese African-American women aged less than 40 years regarding intention for weight loss, 30% and 15% were in precontemplation and contemplation stages respectively.30 Laforge et al. found similar distributions for losing weight in the United States and Australian women: precontemplation (29-41.4%), contemplation (3.5-18.5%), preparation (1.6-8.3%), action (14.7-24.9%) and maintenance (18.1-41%).31 The proportions are consistent with Prochaska’s assertion that most people who need to change a behavior are in precontemplation and contemplation stages.32

The pretreatment measures of stages of change in fifty-five overweight/obese African American women with BMI ranged 26.50-48.13 kg/m2 and 18 to 55 years attended a 13-week weight loss treatment program, indicated 47% as actors, 31% as contemplative and 22% as maintainers.33 It seems that a high percentage of actors at pretreatment may be due to using a single question to assign SOC categorization in this study.The distribution of stages of change in obese patients had been differently reported. In Wee’s survey, 72% of overweight and obese predominantly Caucasian primary care patients were in advanced stages of weight loss.34 Another study conducted by Logue and colleagues found that 80% of obese primary care patients were in advanced stages of change for weight loss.35 The primary care clinic is a medical setting where weight is an issue that physicians and other health care providers often discuss with patients.36In the primary care clinic, patients may feel compelled to report being actively involved in strategies to lose or maintain weight according to the physicians and health care providers’ recommendations. As a result, they may endorse being at a more advanced SOC for weight loss.

Stages of change for trying to lose weight among 42 obese patients with heart failure was 4.8%, 9.5%, 14.3% and 71.4% in the precontemplation, contemplation, action and maintenance stages, respectively.27 In our study, including only apparently healthy obese women may explain the differences between the two studies.

On the other hand, readiness score range from -2 to +14, with higher values indicating greater motivation to change.37 The readiness score ranged 11-14 is recommended as an action stage in the general population.38 Based on this recommendation, only 1.2% of the studied subjects were in the action stage. Hence because of diversity of stages and readiness to change in obese persons attending the nutrition clinic, their treatment must be highly individualized.35

Besides pretreatment self-motivation, weight loss expectation, previous dieting and body image are important factors in weight loss intervention.39 The common cycle of failure and renewed effort that is so endemic to weight loss has been described as the “false hope syndrome”, in which subjects mistakenly attribute their lack of success to either a low willpower or a poorly-conceived diet.40 This syndrome suggests that unrealistic expectations are responsible for the cycle of repeated failure and renewed efforts at self-change characterizing many self changers.41 In this study, the mean expected weight loss was 22.62±8.11% of initial weight but no statistical significant difference was observed between women in different stages of change as the expected weight loss. The studied subjects enrolled in weight loss programs have reported ideal weights requiring between 24% and 38% losses in body weight.42 This amount weight loss is unrealistic expectations about the consequences of successful weight loss program. They are greater than the guidelines that recommend the loss of 5-10% initial weight for obese persons.43 Based on the “false-hope syndrome”, unrealistic expectations develop an unachievable scale for success.41The observed significant positive correlations between stages of change and waist to hip ratio (r=0.33, P<0.05) was in line with findings of Logue in obese patients.35 The relationship between SOC and WHR may be useful in targeting weight loss intervention. It seems that women with a higher waist to hip ratio were more likely to be in later stages of change for weight loss. Our findings provide support for WHR’s role on physical appearance. Physical appearance is one of the main reasons women seek weight loss treatment.44,45 WHR is one body “shape” variable that may relate to dissatisfaction and the decision to lose weight. Women predict they will resemble figures with low waist to hip ratio as the result of weight loss diet.46

This study had its own strength and limitation. It was the first study to translate the URICA questionnaire to Persian language for the assessment of readiness for weight loss among obese women attending a nutrition clinic in Iran. Small sample size was weaknesses in this study that limits the generalizability of these results. Although self-reported data may be contaminated by self-presentation bias, this study identified the distribution of stages of change for weight loss among obese women attending the nutrition clinic.

Conclusion

The assessment of readiness for weight loss and focus on individualized approaches are essential. By knowing individual’s current stage and readiness to change, the dietitian can set realistic goals for weight loss intervention. Further studies are needed using all dimensions of the transtheoretical model rather relying on stages of change with larger sample sizes.

Acknowledgment

This article was written based on a dataset of a PhD thesis (Fatemeh Ghannadi asl) registered at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The authors are grateful for financial support of the Nutrition Research Center in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. We would like to acknowledge the contribution of research participants who were involved in the trial.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:1431–1437. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mirzazadeh A, Sadeghirad B, Haghdoost AA, Bahreini F, Rezazadeh Kermani M. The prevalence of obesity in Iran in recent decade; a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Iran J Public Health. 2009;38:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hill JO, Peters JC, Catenacci VA, Wyatt HR. International strategies to address obesity. Obes Rev. 2008;9 Suppl 1:41–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gingras J, Fitzpatrick J, McCargar L. Body image of chronic dieters: lowered appearance evaluation and body satisfaction. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1589–1592. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Azarbad L, Gonder-Frederick L. Obesity in women. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2010;33:423–440. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Andreyeva T, Long MW, Henderson KE, Grode GM. Trying to lose weight: diet strategies among Americans with overweight or obesity in 1996 and 2003. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:535–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wing RR, Phelan S. Long-term weight loss maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:222S–225S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/82.1.222S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuijer R, de Ridder D, Ouwehand C, Houx B, van den Bos R. Dieting as a case of behavioural decision making. Does self-control matter? . Appetite. 2008;51:506–511. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meule A, Papies EK, Kübler A. Differentiating between successful and unsuccessful dieters. Validity and reliability of the perceived self-regulatory success in dieting scale. Appetite. 2012;58:822–826. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dixon JB, Laurie CP, Anderson ML, Hayden MJ, Dixon ME, O'Brien PE. Motivation, readiness to change, and weight loss following adjustable gastric band surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:698–705. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dunn EC, Neighbors C, Larimer M. Assessing readiness to change binge eating and compensatory behaviors. Eat Behav. 2003;4:305–314. doi: 10.1016/S1471-0153(03)00023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Atkinson RL. Guidelines for the initiation of obesity treatment. J Nutr Biochem. 1998;9:546–552. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–1114. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.9.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krummel DA, Semmens E, Boury J, Gordon PM, Larkin KT. Stages of change for weight management in postpartum women. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1102–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Riebe D, Blissmer B, Greene G, Caldwell M, Ruggiero L, Stillwell KM. et al. Long-term maintenance of exercise and healthy eating behaviors in overweight adults. Prev Med. 2005;40:769–778. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Di Noia J, Prochaska JO. Mediating Variables in a transtheoretical model dietary intervention program. Health Educ Behav. 2010;37:753–762. doi: 10.1177/1090198109334897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hildebrand DA, Betts NM. Assessment of stage of change, decisional balance, self-efficacy, and use of processes of change of low-income parents for increasing servings of fruits and vegetables to preschool-aged children. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41:110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Surís AM, Trapp MC, DiClemente CC, Cousins J. Application of the transtheoretical model of behavior change for obesity in Mexican American women. Addict Behav. 1998;23:655–668. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(98)00012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Logue EE, Jarjoura DG, Sutton KS, Smucker WD, Baughman KR, Capers CF. Longitudinal relationship between elapsed time in the action stages of change and weight loss. Obes Res. 2004;12:1499–1508. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Andrés A, Gómez J, Saldaña C. The transtheoretical model and obesity: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2007;73:289–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Johnson SS, Paiva AL, Cummins CO, Johnson JL, Dyment SJ, Wright JA. et al. Transtheoretical model–based multiple behavior intervention for weight management: effectiveness on a population basis. Prev Med. 2008;46:238–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McConnaughy EA, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Stages of change in psychotherapy: a follow-up report. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 1989;26:494–503. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dozois DJ, Westra HA, Collins KA, Fung TS, Garry JK. Stages of change in anxiety: psychometric properties of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) scale. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42:711–729. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00193-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carbonari JP, DiClemente CC, Zweben A. A readiness to change measure. Discussion symposium: Assessing critical dimensions for alcoholism treatment. Paper presented at 28th annual convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy. San Diego; 1994.
  • 25.Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. NJ: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.
  • 26.Third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, NIH Publication No. 02-5215, September 2002. [PubMed]
  • 27.Sneed NV, Paul SC. Readiness for behavioral changes in patients with heart failure. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12:444–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Toth-Capelli KM, Brawer R, Plumb J, Daskalakis C. Stage of change and other predictors of participant retention in a behavioral weight management program in primary care. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14:441–450. doi: 10.1177/1524839912460871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, Fowler JL, Follick MJ, Abrams DB. Attendance and outcome in a work site weight control program: processes and stages of change as process and predictor variables. Addict Behav. 1992;17:35–45. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(92)90051-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hawkins DS, Hornsby PP, Schorling JB. Stages of change and weight loss among rural African American women. Obes Res. 2001;9:59–67. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laforge RG, Velicer WF, Richmond RL, Owen N. Stage distributions for five health behaviors in the United States and Australia. Prev Med. 1999;28:61–74. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prochaska JO. Helping populations move through stages of change[internet]. USA: Center for Psychiatric Rehabiliation; 2004 [cited 2004 June 23]. Available at :http://www.bu.edu/cpr/webcast/prochaska
  • 33.Sbrocco T, Osborn R, Clark RD, Hsiao CW, Carter MM. Assessing the stages of change among African American women in a weight management program. J Black Psychol. 2011;38:81–103. doi: 10.1177/0095798411403618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wee CC, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Stage of readiness to control weight and adopt weight control behaviors in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:410–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0074.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Logue E, Sutton K, Jarjoura D, Smucker W. Obesity management in primary care: assessment of readiness to change among 284 family practice patients. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13:164–171. doi: 10.3122/15572625-13-3-164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Martin PD, Rhode PC, Howe JT, Brantley PJ. Primary care weight management counseling: Physician and patient perspectives. J La State Med Soc. 2003;155:52–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pinto A, Pinto AM, Neziroglu F, Yaryura-Tobias JA. Motivation to change as a predictor of treatment response in obsessive compulsive disorder. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2007;19:83–87. doi: 10.1080/10401230701334747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.The HABITS Lab at UMBC. Readiness score for URICA[internet]. [cited 2010February 15]. Available at:http://www.umbc.edu/psyc/habits/content/ttm_measures/urica/readiness.html
  • 39.Teixeira PJ, Palmeira AL, Branco TL, Martins SS, Minderico CS, Barata JT. et al. Who will lose weight? A reexamination of predictors of weight loss in women. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004;1:12. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-1-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Polivy J. The false hope syndrome: unrealistic expectations of self-change. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25 (Suppl 1):S80–S84. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Trottier K, Polivy J, Herman CP. Trottier K, Polivy J, Herman CPEffects of resolving to change one's own behavior: expectations vsexperience. Behav Ther . 2009;40:164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dutton GR, Perri MG, Dancer-Brown M, Goble M, Van Vessem N. Weight loss goals of patients in a health maintenance organization. Eat Behav. 2010;11:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.The National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2003.
  • 44.Faries MD, Bartholomew JB. The role of body fat in female attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav. 2012;33:672–681. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Polivy J, Herman CP. An evolutionary perspective on dieting. Appetite. 2006;47:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wilson JM, Tripp DA, Boland FJ. The relative contributions of subjective and objective measures of body shape and size to body image and disordered eating in women. Body Image. 2005;2:233–247. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Promotion Perspectives are provided here courtesy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES