Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Aug 5;9(8):e104082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104082

Common Genetic Determinants of Lung Function, Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease

Maria Sabater-Lleal 1,*, Anders Mälarstig 2, Lasse Folkersen 1,¤, María Soler Artigas 3,4, Damiano Baldassarre 5,6, Maryam Kavousi 7, Peter Almgren 8, Fabrizio Veglia 6, Guy Brusselle 7,9,10, Albert Hofman 7, Gunnar Engström 8, Oscar H Franco 7, Olle Melander 8,11, Gabrielle Paulsson-Berne 12, Hugh Watkins 13, Per Eriksson 1, Steve E Humphries 14, Elena Tremoli 5,6, Ulf de Faire 15, Martin D Tobin 3,4, Anders Hamsten 1
Editor: Giuseppe Novelli16
PMCID: PMC4122436  PMID: 25093840

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) independently associates with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), but it has not been fully investigated whether this co-morbidity involves shared pathophysiological mechanisms. To identify potential common pathways across the two diseases, we tested all recently published single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with human lung function (spirometry) for association with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in 3,378 subjects with multiple CAD risk factors, and for association with CAD in a case-control study of 5,775 CAD cases and 7,265 controls. SNPs rs2865531, located in the CFDP1 gene, and rs9978142, located in the KCNE2 gene, were significantly associated with CAD. In addition, SNP rs9978142 and SNP rs3995090 located in the HTR4 gene, were associated with average and maximal cIMT measures. Genetic risk scores combining the most robustly spirometry–associated SNPs from the literature were modestly associated with CAD, (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI95) = 1.06 (1.03, 1.09); P-value = 1.5×10−4, per allele). In conclusion, our study suggests that some genetic loci implicated in determining human lung function also influence cIMT and susceptibility to CAD. The present results should help elucidate the molecular underpinnings of the co-morbidity observed across COPD and CAD.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition characterised by impaired airflow to the lungs that worsens over time [1]. The primary risk factor for COPD is long-term exposure to noxious particles and gases, in particular from cigarette smoking, which has been shown to trigger inflammation and abnormal immune responses in the small airways [2]. Local inflammation in the lung may, in turn, trigger systemic inflammatory reactions, such as production of acute-phase proteins in the liver, with potential adverse consequences for non-respiratory organs [3]. The incidence proportion of COPD of any severity grade in smokers reported by observational studies ranges between 15%–40%. The corresponding rates in non-smokers are 8%–15% [4], [5]. As not all smokers contract COPD, it is believed that susceptibility to COPD is highly variable between individuals, and that some of the variability may be explained by genetics, environment and lifestyle, and interactions between these factors [6].

In pulmonary function testing with spirometry, a reduced postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio indicates the presence of airflow limitation and is required for the diagnosis of COPD. To study the genetic component of COPD, genome-wide association (GWA) studies have attempted to identify genetic determinants of human lung function in healthy subjects, using spirometry data on Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV)1 and its ratio to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (FEV1/FVC). To date, a total of 26 genetic loci for human lung function have been identified, some of which also seem to be associated with COPD susceptibility, such as the loci at TNS1, RARB, FAM13A, GSTCD, HHIP, ADAM19, HTR4, AGER, GPR126, C10orf11 and THSD4 [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Multiple studies have reported that cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure, stroke and peripheral arterial disease, is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity in COPD. A recent meta-analysis sought to quantify the CVD risk in COPD using literature data, and observed a 2–5 fold increased CVD risk in patients with COPD compared with age- and sex-matched controls without COPD [12]. The difference persisted after adjustment for known risk factors. Amongst several possible explanations for the strong co-morbidity is that COPD and CAD not only progress in parallel, but also share some common etiologically relevant biological pathways, involving e.g. oxidative stress, matrix remodelling and innate and adaptive immune responses. In the present study, we sought to address this hypothesis by testing genetic loci for spirometric measures as determinants for carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and susceptibility to CAD.

Methods

SNP selection

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) attaining genome-wide significance in four recent GWA studies for either FEV1 or the ratio of FEV1 to FVC [13], [14], [15], [16] were selected for cross-reference analysis with CAD susceptibility and cIMT. In particular, we selected 26 lead SNPs, representing 26 loci robustly associated with spirometry measures, through a literature search (Table 1).

Table 1. Information of the 26 lung function-associated SNPs selected in the present study [13], [14], [15], [16].

LITERATURE IMPROVE
SNP ID Chr closest gene A1 A1 freq Measure reported Beta SE P proxy_LD SNP A1 A2 A1 freq n
rs2284746 1 MFAP2 G 0.52 FEV1/FVC –0.040 0.005 7.5×10−16 0.87 rs6657613 T A 0.47 3378
rs993925 1 TGFB2 T 0.31 FEV1/FVC 0.034 0.006 1.16×10−8 1.00 rs993925 G A 0.29 3276
rs2571445 2 TNS1 G 0.60 FEV1 0.035 0.005 1.11×10−12 1.00 rs2571445 A G 0.40 3378
rs12477314 2 HDAC4 T 0.20 FEV1/FVC 0.041 0.006 1.68×10−12 1.00 rs12477314 G A 0.22 3255
rs1529672 3 RARB C 0.83 FEV1/FVC –0.048 0.006 3.97×10−14 1.00 rs1529672 C A 0.18 3281
rs1344555 3 MECOM T 0.21 FEV1 –0.034 0.006 2.65×10−8 1.00 rs1344555 G A 0.20 3266
rs2869967 4 FAM13A T 0.61 FEV1/FVC 0.035 0.007 1.91×10−7 1.00 rs2869967 C T 0.39 3226
rs10516526 4 GSTCD G 0.06 FEV1 0.089 0.009 2.18×10−23 1.00 rs10516526 G A 0.06 3203
rs12504628 4 HHIP T 0.56 FEV1/FVC –0.077 0.011 6.48×10−13 0.97 rs13147758 G A 0.45 3378
rs2277027 5 ADAM19 A 0.71 FEV1/FVC 0.045 0.007 9.93×10−11 1.00 rs2277027 C A 0.36 3235
rs3995090 5 HTR4 C 0.40 FEV1 0.038 0.006 4.29×10−09 1.00 rs3995090 C A 0.43 3283
rs153916 5 SPATA9 T 0.55 FEV1/FVC –0.031 0.005 2.012×10−8 1.00 rs153916 A G 0.44 3292
rs3817928 6 GPR126 A 0.78 FEV1/FVC –0.050 0.008 1.17×10−09 1.00 rs11155242 C A 0.19 3378
rs2070600 6 AGER T 0.05 FEV1/FVC 0.088 0.011 3.07×10−15 1.00 rs2070600 T C 0.04 3370
rs2857595 6 NCR3 G 0.81 FEV1/FVC 0.037 0.006 2.28×10−10 1.00 rs2857595 A G 0.17 3378
rs6903823 6 ZKSCAN3/ZNF323 G 0.25 FEV1/FVC −0.021 0.007 1.19×10−3 0.95 rs6912584 C T 0.17 3378
rs2798641 6 ARMC2 T 0.18 FEV1/FVC –0.041 0.007 8.35×10−9 1.00 rs2768551 A G 0.18 3378
rs16909898 9 PTCH1 A 0.90 FEV1/FVC 0.059 0.012 5.34×10−07 0.85 rs16909981 C G 0.12 3378
rs7068966 10 CDC123 T 0.52 FEV1/FVC 0.033 0.005 6.13×10−13 1.00 rs7068966 A G 0.48 3249
rs7068966 10 CDC123 T 0.52 FEV1 0.029 0.004 2.82×10−12 1.00 rs7068966 A G 0.48 3249
rs11001819 10 C10orf11 G 0.52 FEV1 –0.029 0.004 2.98×10−12 1.00 rs11001819 C T 0.44 3312
rs11172113 12 LRP1 T 0.61 FEV1/FVC –0.032 0.006 1.24×10−8 1.00 rs11172113 C T 0.38 3377
rs1036429 12 CCDC38 T 0.20 FEV1/FVC 0.038 0.006 2.3×10−11 1.00 rs1036429 T C 0.19 3378
rs12899618 15 THSD4 G 0.85 FEV1/FVC 0.060 0.008 7.24×10−15 0.92 rs7172592 T C 0.18 3378
rs2865531 16 CFDP1 T 0.42 FEV1/FVC 0.031 0.005 1.77×10−11 0.93 rs4888378 A G 0.43 3378
rs12447804 16 MMP15 T 0.21 FEV1/FVC –0.038 0.007 3.59×10−8 1.00 rs12447804 G A 0.21 3282
rs9978142 21 KCNE2 T 0.16 FEV1/FVC −0.043 0.008 2.65×10−8 0.91 rs973754 G A 0.14 3378

Columns 1 to 9 refer to frequencies, beta and p values for the association of SNPs with lung function fenotypes as found in the literature. Columns 10 to 15 refer to the frequencies and total sample sizes of the same or proxy-SNPs that were looked up in IMPROVE.

SNP ID: rs number for the SNPs selected from literature. Chr: chromosome, A1: coded allele, A1 freq: frequency of the coded allele, Measure reported: phenotype for which the SNP reached genome-wide significant association, SE: standard error, P: p-value for association with measure reported, proxy LD: linkage disequilibrium between SNP ID from literature (column 1) and the proxy used for replication in IMPROVE (column 11), proxy SNP: rs number for the proxy SNPs used for replication in IMPROVE, n: number of individuals tested in IMPROVE.

Association with cIMT measures

The database and biobank of a large, multicenter, European prospective cohort study (acronym: IMPROVE (Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) and IMT-PRogression as Predictors of Vascular Events in a High-Risk European Population) was used for studying SNP associations with various cIMT measures. The IMPROVE study was set up for the study of cIMT measures as predictors of incident coronary events, and enrolled 3,711 subjects with at least three independent CAD risk factors. Detailed descriptions of IMPROVE, including the protocols for carotid ultrasound measures have been reported [17], [18]. In the present study, a total of 3,378 subjects were available for the genetic association analyses, which included the mean and maximum IMT of a common carotid segment excluding the first cm proximal to the bifurcation (CC-IMTmean and CC-IMTmax), mean and maximum IMT in the internal carotid arteries (ICA-IMTmean and ICA-IMTmax), and the mean and maximum IMT of the bifurcation (Bif-IMTmean and Bif-IMTmax). Composite IMT variables considering the whole carotid tree, derived from the segment-specific measurements (IMTmean, IMTmax, and IMTmean-max (the average of IMT maxima recorded at the different segments)) were also tested for association.

Six of the SNPs had previously been genotyped on the Illumina CardioMetabochip array. The CardioMetabochip interrogates ≈200,000 SNPs located in regions identified by previous GWA studies of metabolic and cardiovascular traits and diseases. For eight of the lead SNPs, we selected proxy SNPs (r2≥0.85) that were present on the CardioMetabochip array. Proxies were selected using SNAP software [19] using 1000 genomes pilot 1 CEU samples as reference. The remaining 12 SNPs were genotyped with TaqMan probes from Applied Biosystems. Quality control procedures for the CardioMetabochip array in IMPROVE have been described [20].

We performed linear regression analyses between the 26 lung function-associated SNPs and different cIMT measures using PLINK (v1.07) [21], assuming an additive genetic model and adjusting for age, gender, body-mass index and the first 3 multidimensional scaling (MDS) dimensions to account for population stratification (based on CardioMetabochip genotype data, see details in [20]). All cIMT variables were logarithmically transformed before statistical analysis because of skewed distributions. All P-values were Bonferroni-corrected (statistical significance set at a P-value≤0.00192).

Replication

Replication of the rs3995090 association with cIMT measures was pursued in the Rotterdam Study (RSI and RSII) and in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Cohort (MDCC). A description of the samples used for all analyses is included in Section S1. Only measures of CC-IMTmean were available in all replication cohorts. In addition, CC-IMTmax measures were available for RSI and RSII. Results from the three replication cohorts were meta-analyzed by using an inverse-variance model with fixed effects as implemented in METAL [22]. Statistical significance for this SNP was set at a P-value≤0.05.

Association with CAD

We also sought association in silico of the 26 lung function SNPs with CAD in 5,775 CAD cases and 7,265 controls using GWA data from the PROCARDIS [23] and Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) collections [24]. Association was tested by logistic regression analysis assuming an additive model and adjusting for age, gender, and country using STATA version 11 ( StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Since PROCARDIS contains related individuals (see Section S1), relatedness was taken into account by setting families as clusters. All P-values were Bonferroni-corrected (statistical significance set at a P-value≤0.00192).

Association with Gene Expression

SNP rs3995090 was further analyzed, first with respect to its association with expression levels of HTR4, and then in relation to the level of expression of adjacent genes (located within ±500 kilobases (kb) of HTR4) in a secondary extended search, using data from the Advanced Study of Aortic Pathology (ASAP) and Biobank of Karolinska Endarterectomies (BiKE) data sets [25]. In the ASAP study, mRNA was extracted from biopsies of ascending thoracic aorta intima-media (n = 138), aortic adventitia (n = 133), mammary artery (n = 89), heart (n = 127), and liver (n = 211) from patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. In the BiKE study, RNA was extracted from human plaque tissue (n = 126) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (n = 96) from patients referred for surgical treatment of severe carotid artery stenosis. Associations between SNP genotype and gene expression level were examined using additive linear models. Rs3995090 was genotyped in both studies with the Illumina 610w-Quad BeadArray.

Genetic Risk Scores

We calculated weighted and unweighted genetic risk scores (GRS) based on the significant SNPs from the FEV1/FVC and FEV1 GWAs in the literature and used it as a continuous predictor in logistic/linear regression models with CAD and cIMT-related phenotypes. Unweighted GRS were built considering the number of risk alleles, while weighted GRS were built considering the number of risk alleles weighting them for the beta values reported in literature. Specifically, the GRS for FEV1/FVC was built on the following SNPs and beta values (in brackets) derived from [13], [14], [15], [16]: rs153916 (0.031), rs2277027 (0.045), rs12447804 (0.038), rs2857595 (0.037), rs2070600 (0.088), rs2869967 (0.035), rs11172113 (0.032), rs12477314 (0.041), rs1690989 (0.059), rs3817928 (0.05), rs2865531 (0.031), rs7068966 (0.033), rs2284746 (0.04), rs9978142 (0.043), rs993925 (0.034), rs1036429 (0.037), rs12899618 (0.06), rs1529672 (0.048), rs12504628 (0.077) and rs2798641 (0.041). The GRS for FEV1 was built on the following SNPs and beta values: rs2571445 (0.035), rs6903823 (0.037), rs10516526 (0.089), rs3995090 (0.038), rs11001819 (0.029), rs1344555 (0.034) and rs7068966 (0.029). Figure S1 shows the frequencies of the number of risk alleles used to calculate unweighted GRS within PROCARDIS and IMPROVE cohorts. Since weighted GRS result from the product of the number of risk alleles and their effect size, the resulting units are arbitrary. For the sake of clarity, weighted GRS were divided in intervals representing total number of possible risk alleles to be comparable to the “increased OR per risk allele” that was calculated for the unweighted scores.

Results

Associations with cIMT-related measures

We tested the association between the 26 selected SNPs (or good proxies) and the different cIMT-associated phenotypes. After adjustment for age, gender and the first three MDS, a SNP located in the HTR4 gene (rs3995090) and a proxy for rs2865531 (located in CFDP1) were found to be consistently associated with several of the cIMT-associated phenotypes (Table 2, Table S1). The strongest associations were observed with IMTmean (rs3995090) and IMTmean-max (rs2865531), both composite cIMT variables considering the whole carotid tree and derived from the segment-specific measurements. There was very little change in association after further adjustment for smoking (pack-years) (data not shown). Results stratified by smoking-status are shown in Tables S2S3.

Table 2. SNPs showing significant associations with different IMT measurements.

CC-IMTmean CC-IMTmax ICA-IMTmean ICA-IMTmax Bif-IMTmean Bif_IMTmax IMTmean IMTmax IMTmean-max
SNP A1 beta P beta P beta P beta P beta P beta P beta P beta P beta P
rs3995090 C 0.003 0.088 0.002 0.380 0.010 0.004 0.012 0.007 0.010 0.002 0.010 0.017 0.007 2.63E-04 0.010 0.010 0.007 0.002
rs4888378 A –0.005 0.009 –0.007 0.010 –0.011 0.001 –0.016 4.41E-04 –0.013 6.14E-05 –0.018 8.74E-06 –0.009 3.93E-06 –0.019 5.10E-07 –0.010 2.87E-06

Chr: chromosome, A1: coded allele, P: p-value for association with IMT, CC-IMTmean: average IMT of the common carotid in a segment excluding the first cm proximal to the bifurcation, CC-IMTmax: maximum IMT of the common carotid in a segment excluding the first cm proximal to the bifurcation, ICA-IMTmean: average IMT of the internal carotid, ICA-IMTmax: maximum IMT of the internal carotid, Bif-IMTmean: average IMT of the bifurcation, Bif-IMTmax: maximum IMT of the bifurcation, IMTmean: average IMT composite value considering the whole carotid tree derived from the segment-specific measurements, IMTmax: Maximum IMT measure considering the whole carotid tree derived from the segment-specific measurements, IMTmean-max: average of the IMTmax values for the whole carotid tree derived from the segment-specific measurements. rs4888378 was used as proxy SNP for rs2865531.

A regional look-up to assess the association between other SNPs located in the HTR4 gene (rs10077690, rs17720191, rs11168048, rs10061244, rs13359903, rs2278392, rs1422636, rs4336354, rs1833710, rs7700268 and rs888961) did not uncover any other significant cIMT association within this gene.

Associations were also investigated under a model where all established CAD risk factors were included, using a stepwise model in SPSS (using log-transformed IMTmean as phenotype). Altogether, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, waist-hip ratio, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol explained 7.5% of the variance in this cIMT phenotype, after adjusting for MDS1–3, age and sex. After adjustment for all these covariates, rs3995090 and rs2865531 remained significantly associated with the cIMT phenotypes (Table S4).

GRS-based analyses using the significant SNPs from the FEV1/FVC and FEV1 GWAs in literature were not significant for association with cIMT phenotypes (Table S5).

Association with CAD

The minor allele of the SNP located in the CFDP1 gene (rs2865531T) was associated with a lower risk of CAD (OR(CI95) = 0.85(0.79–0.92); P-value = 5.36×10−5). The minor allele of the SNP located in KCNE2 (rs9978142T) was associated with increased risk of CAD (OR(CI95) = 1.22 (1.10, 1.35); P-value = 1.23×10−4). In addition, the GRS assessing the global effect of all the 7 FEV1–robustly associated SNPs from the 4 previous GWAs in literature showed a moderate effect but significant association with CAD risk, OR(CI95) for weighted score = 1.05 (1.02, 1.08); P-value = 0.002; OR(CI95) for unweighted score = 1.06 (1.03, 1.09); P-value = 1.5×10−4 per allele).

The GRS assessing the global effect of the 20 FEV1/FVC-robustly associated SNPs from the 4 previous GWAs in literature did not prove to be significantly associated with CAD. Association results for all SNPs is shown in Table S6.

Replication

Among the two spirometry SNPs that showed significant associations with cIMT measures, rs2865531 has been previously reported as a determinant of cIMT and CAD risk [20]. Likewise, the associations between rs9978142 and rs2865533 and CAD susceptibility were previously established in a large case-control study of CAD [26]; hence, replication was not pursued.

Therefore, we concentrated further replication efforts on SNP rs3995090. Replication of rs3995090 was sought in a total of 12,803 individuals with CC-IMTmean and in 6,679 individuals with CC-IMTmax measures. The rs3995090A allele was associated with increased CC-IMTmax (beta = 0.006, P-value = 0.044).

Association with gene expression

Expression levels of HTR4 in the heart and vessel wall tissues were lower than average (below the 30% percentile of all genes). In peripheral blood mononuclear cells and carotid plaque, the gene was expressed at the 60% percentile of all genes. SNP rs3995090 was not associated with mRNA expression levels of HTR4 in any of the tissues tested in the ASAP and BiKE studies, although a trend was observed in aortic adventitia at P = 0.0826. In a further expanded search including other neighbouring genes (±500 Kb), rs3995090 was not associated with mRNA levels of other neighbouring genes, after multiple-testing correction for 7 genes in 7 data sets (Table S7).

Discussion

COPD is the fourth largest cause of death worldwide [27]. Co-morbidities between COPD and other common complex diseases such as CAD may suggest that shared genetic and/or environmental risk factors exist. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested before that CAD is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity in COPD, and that the association between COPD measures and CAD goes beyond the fact that both diseases share common environmental risk factors, such as poor diet, sedentary lifestyle and smoking (reviewed in [28]). Although these studies cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between COPD and CAD, strong evidence suggests that the increased systemic inflammation and oxidative stress associated with COPD contribute to the increased risk of cardiovascular events, and it is plausible that multiple other still unknown pathophysiologic pathways may contribute to the development of both diseases (reviewed in [29]).

In order to explore potential common genetic variants influencing risk of both COPD and cardiovascular disease, we tested 26 SNPs with robust association with human lung function for association with CAD. Since cIMT is considered a robust biomarker for early atherosclerosis, we also tested these 26 lung function-associated SNPs with different measures of cIMT. Of note, inverse relationships between pulmonary function measures adjusted for other risk factors and cIMT have been found in several studies [30], [31], [32], indicating that cIMT may be a robust biomarker for determining cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in COPD [29].

In agreement with our hypothesis that common genetic factors exist between the COPD and CAD, we found two lung function-associated SNPs (rs2865531, located in the CFDP1 gene and rs9978142 located in the KCNE2 gene) that were also associated with CAD, the minor allele being associated with lower (rs2865531T) risk and increased risk of CAD (rs9978142T), respectively. In addition, the latter, along with SNP rs3995090 located in the HTR4 gene, showed strong associations with several cIMT measures. Finally, a GRS, assessing the global effect of all the 7 FEV1–associated SNPs from the literature, showed an association with CAD risk. In all, these results indicate that common genetic pathways may exist between COPD and cIMT and CAD, and these are probably independent from the most classical associated factors, such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, waist-hip ratio, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol, since further adjustment for these covariates did not alter the associations found in the present study.

Among the SNPs associated with both diseases, the SNP located in KNCE2 (rs9982601, proxy for rs973754 (r2 = 0.81)) has previously been associated with early-onset myocardial infarction (MI) in a GWA study of 2,967 cases and 3,075 matched controls (OR(CI95%) = 1.19 (1.13, 1.27), P = 2×10−9) [26]. KNCE2, located on chromosome 21, codes for a potassium voltage-gated channel, and mutations in this gene cause inherited arrhythmias [33]. The rare allele of the SNP located in CFDP1 was recently found to be associated with higher cIMT measures in a gene-centric meta-analysis [20]. Interestingly, this SNP was not associated with expression levels of CFDP1, although a strong association was found between rs4888378 alleles and expression levels of a nearby gene (BCAR1), which has been implicated in cellular adhesion, migration and proliferation/survival of smooth muscle cells [20], [34], [35].

Our results for rs3995090, located in the HTR4 region, do not provide solid evidence of an association with a specific gene. The SNP is located in HTR4, which is a member of the family of serotonin receptors. However, expression analyses showed that there are no allelic-specific differences in the expression of this gene by rs3995090 genotype. Other mechanisms might be present that explain the effect of rs3995090 in HTR4, possibly involving changes at a protein level. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of this SNP.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive look-up of human lung function robustly-associated loci for association with CAD and cIMT. Although several epidemiologic studies have suggested shared pathophysiologic pathways between both diseases, the present study clearly demonstrates that some human lung function-associated loci are also associated with CAD and cIMT. While further functional studies are warranted to elucidate the role of these genes in the pathophysiology of COPD and CAD, the overall findings made in this and previous studies suggest that there are some shared genetic pathways involved in airway obstruction and cardiovascular risk. This notion opens new interesting perspectives in understanding the co-morbidity of two important, common complex diseases.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Frequencies of the FEV1 and FEV1/FCV number of risk alleles in IMPROVE and PROCARDIS.

(PDF)

Table S1

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in IMPROVE.

(DOCX)

Table S2

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in smokers from IMPROVE.

(DOCX)

Table S3

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in non-smokers from IMPROVE.

(DOCX)

Table S4

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in IMPROVE after adjusting for age, sex, MDS1–3, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, waist-hip ratio, tryglicerides, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol.

(DOCX)

Table S5

Association between weighted Genetic Risk Scores (GRS) and IMT phenotypes in IMPROVE, after adjustment for age, sex and the three first multidimensional scaling (MDS) dimensions.

(DOCX)

Table S6

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and CAD risk in PROCARDIS+WTCCC (5,775 CAD cases and 7,265 controls).

(DOCX)

Table S7

Association between rs3995090 and HTR4 expression levels in different tissues.

(DOCX)

Section S1

Sample descriptions.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The IMPROVE study was supported by the European Commission (Contract number: QLG1-CT-2002-00896), the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Research Council (projects 8691 and 0593), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Foundation for Strategic Research, the Stockholm County Council (project 592229), the Strategic Cardiovascular and Diabetes Programmes of Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, the Academy of Finland (Grant #110413), the British Heart Foundation (RG2008/08, RG2008/014) and the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente).

PROCARDIS was supported by the European Community Sixth Framework Program (LSHM-CT-2007-037273), AstraZeneca, the British Heart Foundation, the Wellcome Trust (Contract No. 075491/Z/04), the Swedish Research Council, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg Foundation, the Strategic Cardiovascular and Diabetes Programs of Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, the Foundation for Strategic Research and the Stockholm County Council. This study made use of data generated by the WTCCC; a full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the data is available at www.wtccc.org.uk.

The Rotterdam GWA study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research (NWO) Investments (nr. 175.010.2005.011, 911-03-012), the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (014-93-015; RIDE2), the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)/Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging (NCHA) project nr. 050-060-810. The Rotterdam Study is funded by the Erasmus Medical Center and the Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE), The Netherlands Heart Foundation, the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports, the European Commission (DG XII), and the Municipality of Rotterdam. Maryam Kavousi is supported by the AXA Research Fund. Oscar H. Franco works in ErasmusAGE, a center for aging research across the life course funded by Nestlé Nutrition (Nestec Ltd.); Metagenics Inc.; and AXA. Nestlé Nutrition (Nestec Ltd.); Metagenics Inc.; and AXA had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.

The Malmö Diet and Cancer (MDC) study was funded by the Swedish research council 2011–3891, and the Swedish Heart and Lung foundation (20130249). OM was supported by grants from the European Research Council (StG-282255), Swedish Medical Research Council, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Medical Faculty of Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, the Albert Påhlsson Research Foundation, the Crafoord Foundation, the Ernhold Lundströms Research Foundation, the Region Skane, Hulda and Conrad Mossfelt Foundation and King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria Foundation, the Lennart Hanssons Memorial Fund and the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation.

The research undertaken by MDT and MSA was part-funded funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. MDT holds a Medical Research Council Senior Clinical Fellowship (G0902313).

Finally, we would like to acknowledge Prof. John Öhrvik for his helpful statistical advice.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that, for approved reasons, some access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings. Because of restrictions based on privacy regulations and informed consent of the participants, we want to state that data cannot be made freely available in a public repository. Data can however be obtained upon request. Requests For RS data should be directed towards the management team for the Rotterdam Study (secretariat.epi@erasmusmc.nl), which has a protocol for approving data requests; to Anders Hamsten (Anders.Hamsten@ki.se) for PROCARDIS data; to Fabrizio Veglia (Fabrizio.veglia@ccfm.it.) for IMPROVE data; to Olle Melander (olle.melander@med.lu.se) for MDC data; to Per Eriksson (per.eriksson@ki.se) for ASAP data; and to Gabrielle Paulsson-Berne (gabrielle.berne@ki.se) for BIKE data.

Funding Statement

On behalf of all the authors, Dr. Sabater-Lleal would like to state that the authors received no specific funding for this work, however Pfizer provided support in the form of salary for author Dr. Mälarstig, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of this author are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

References

  • 1. Silverman EK, Speizer FE (1996) Risk factors for the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Clin North Am 80: 501–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wright JL, Hobson JE, Wiggs B, Pare PD, Hogg JC (1988) Airway inflammation and peribronchiolar attachments in the lungs of nonsmokers, current and ex-smokers. Lung 166: 277–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gan WQ, Man SF, Senthilselvan A, Sin DD (2004) Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and systemic inflammation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Thorax 59: 574–580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Eisner MD, Anthonisen N, Coultas D, Kuenzli N, Perez-Padilla R, et al. (2010) An official American Thoracic Society public policy statement: Novel risk factors and the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182: 693–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lokke A, Lange P, Scharling H, Fabricius P, Vestbo J (2006) Developing COPD: a 25 year follow up study of the general population. Thorax 61: 935–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Silverman EK (2006) Progress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease genetics. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3: 405–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Castaldi PJ, Cho MH, Litonjua AA, Bakke P, Gulsvik A, et al. (2011) The association of genome-wide significant spirometric loci with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease susceptibility. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 45: 1147–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cho MH, Boutaoui N, Klanderman BJ, Sylvia JS, Ziniti JP, et al. (2010) Variants in FAM13A are associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nat Genet 42: 200–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pillai SG, Ge D, Zhu G, Kong X, Shianna KV, et al. (2009) A genome-wide association study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): identification of two major susceptibility loci. PLoS Genet 5: e1000421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Soler Artigas M, Wain LV, Repapi E, Obeidat M, Sayers I, et al. (2011) Effect of five genetic variants associated with lung function on the risk of chronic obstructive lung disease, and their joint effects on lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184: 786–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wilk JB, Shrine NR, Loehr LR, Zhao JH, Manichaikul A, et al. (2012) Genome-wide association studies identify CHRNA5/3 and HTR4 in the development of airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186: 622–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mullerova H, Agusti A, Erqou S, Mapel DW (2013) Cardiovascular Comorbidity in COPD: Systematic Literature Review. Chest 144: 1163–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Repapi E, Sayers I, Wain LV, Burton PR, Johnson T, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with lung function. Nat Genet 42: 36–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Soler Artigas M, Loth DW, Wain LV, Gharib SA, Obeidat M, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association and large-scale follow up identifies 16 new loci influencing lung function. Nat Genet 43: 1082–1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hancock DB, Eijgelsheim M, Wilk JB, Gharib SA, Loehr LR, et al. (2010) Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple loci associated with pulmonary function. Nat Genet 42: 45–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wilk JB, Chen TH, Gottlieb DJ, Walter RE, Nagle MW, et al. (2009) A genome-wide association study of pulmonary function measures in the Framingham Heart Study. PLoS Genet 5: e1000429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Baldassarre D, Hamsten A, Veglia F, de Faire U, Humphries SE, et al. (2012) Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events: results of the IMPROVE (Carotid Intima Media Thickness [IMT] and IMT-Progression as Predictors of Vascular Events in a High Risk European Population) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60: 1489–1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Baldassarre D, Veglia F, Hamsten A, Humphries SE, Rauramaa R, et al. Progression of carotid intima-media thickness as predictor of vascular events: results from the IMPROVE study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 33: 2273–2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Johnson AD, Handsaker RE, Pulit SL, Nizzari MM, O’Donnell CJ, et al. (2008) SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap. Bioinformatics 24: 2938–2939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gertow K, Sennblad B, Strawbridge RJ, Ohrvik J, Zabaneh D, et al. (2012) Identification of the BCAR1-CFDP1-TMEM170A locus as a determinant of carotid intima-media thickness and coronary artery disease risk. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 5: 656–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81: 559–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR (2010) METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics 26: 2190–2191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC, Kyriakou T, Goel A, et al. (2009) Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 361: 2518–2528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Peden J, Hopewell JC, Saleheen D (2011) A genome-wide association study in Europeans and South Asians identifies five new loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet 43: 339–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Folkersen L, van’t Hooft F, Chernogubova E, Agardh HE, Hansson GK, et al. (2010) Association of genetic risk variants with expression of proximal genes identifies novel susceptibility genes for cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 3: 365–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Myocardial Infarction Genetics C, Kathiresan S, Voight BF, Purcell S, Musunuru K, et al. (2009) Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants. Nat Genet 41: 334–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1997) Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 349: 1436–1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Maclay JD, McAllister DA, Macnee W (2007) Cardiovascular risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology 12: 634–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bhatt SP, Dransfield MT (2013) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease. Transl Res. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Crawford DC, Carlson CS, Rieder MJ, Carrington DP, Yi Q, et al. (2004) Haplotype diversity across 100 candidate genes for inflammation, lipid metabolism, and blood pressure regulation in two populations. Am J Hum Genet 74: 610–622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, et al. (1999) Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke 30: 841–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schroeder EB, Welch VL, Evans GW, Heiss G (2005) Impaired lung function and subclinical atherosclerosis. The ARIC Study. Atherosclerosis 180: 367–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Abbott GW, Sesti F, Splawski I, Buck ME, Lehmann MH, et al. (1999) MiRP1 forms IKr potassium channels with HERG and is associated with cardiac arrhythmia. Cell 97: 175–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Tang DD (2009) p130 Crk-associated substrate (CAS) in vascular smooth muscle. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 14: 89–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tikhmyanova N, Little JL, Golemis EA (2010) CAS proteins in normal and pathological cell growth control. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 1025–1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Frequencies of the FEV1 and FEV1/FCV number of risk alleles in IMPROVE and PROCARDIS.

(PDF)

Table S1

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in IMPROVE.

(DOCX)

Table S2

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in smokers from IMPROVE.

(DOCX)

Table S3

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in non-smokers from IMPROVE.

(DOCX)

Table S4

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and IMT phenotypes in IMPROVE after adjusting for age, sex, MDS1–3, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, waist-hip ratio, tryglicerides, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol.

(DOCX)

Table S5

Association between weighted Genetic Risk Scores (GRS) and IMT phenotypes in IMPROVE, after adjustment for age, sex and the three first multidimensional scaling (MDS) dimensions.

(DOCX)

Table S6

Association between all lung function-associated SNPs from 4 GWA studies in the literature and CAD risk in PROCARDIS+WTCCC (5,775 CAD cases and 7,265 controls).

(DOCX)

Table S7

Association between rs3995090 and HTR4 expression levels in different tissues.

(DOCX)

Section S1

Sample descriptions.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that, for approved reasons, some access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings. Because of restrictions based on privacy regulations and informed consent of the participants, we want to state that data cannot be made freely available in a public repository. Data can however be obtained upon request. Requests For RS data should be directed towards the management team for the Rotterdam Study (secretariat.epi@erasmusmc.nl), which has a protocol for approving data requests; to Anders Hamsten (Anders.Hamsten@ki.se) for PROCARDIS data; to Fabrizio Veglia (Fabrizio.veglia@ccfm.it.) for IMPROVE data; to Olle Melander (olle.melander@med.lu.se) for MDC data; to Per Eriksson (per.eriksson@ki.se) for ASAP data; and to Gabrielle Paulsson-Berne (gabrielle.berne@ki.se) for BIKE data.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES