Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1995 Aug 15;92(17):7814–7818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7814

The two single-strand cleavages at each end of Tn10 occur in a specific order during transposition.

S Bolland 1, N Kleckner 1
PMCID: PMC41236  PMID: 7644497

Abstract

During Tn10 transposition, the element is excised from the donor site by double-strand cleavages at the two transposon ends. Double-strand cleavage is a central step in the nonreplicative transposition reaction of many transposons in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Evidence is presented to show that the Tn10 double-strand cut is made by an ordered, sequential cleavage of the two strands. The transferred strand is cut first, and then the nontransferred strand is cleaved. The single-strand nicked intermediate is seen to accumulate when Mn2+ is substituted for Mg2+ in the reaction or when certain mutant transposases are used. The fact that the transferred strand is cleaved before the non-transferred strand implies that the order of strand cleavages is not the determining factor that precludes a replicative mechanism of transposition.

Full text

PDF
7814

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bainton R. J., Kubo K. M., Feng J. N., Craig N. L. Tn7 transposition: target DNA recognition is mediated by multiple Tn7-encoded proteins in a purified in vitro system. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):931–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90581-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bender J., Kleckner N. Genetic evidence that Tn10 transposes by a nonreplicative mechanism. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):801–815. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90555-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chalmers R. M., Kleckner N. Tn10/IS10 transposase purification, activation, and in vitro reaction. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 18;269(11):8029–8035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haniford D. B., Benjamin H. W., Kleckner N. Kinetic and structural analysis of a cleaved donor intermediate and a strand transfer intermediate in Tn10 transposition. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):171–179. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90218-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haniford D. B., Chelouche A. R., Kleckner N. A specific class of IS10 transposase mutants are blocked for target site interactions and promote formation of an excised transposon fragment. Cell. 1989 Oct 20;59(2):385–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90299-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haniford D., Kleckner N. Tn 10 transposition in vivo: temporal separation of cleavages at the two transposon ends and roles of terminal basepairs subsequent to interaction of ends. EMBO J. 1994 Jul 15;13(14):3401–3411. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06643.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huisman O., Errada P. R., Signon L., Kleckner N. Mutational analysis of IS10's outside end. EMBO J. 1989 Jul;8(7):2101–2109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03619.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huisman O., Kleckner N. A new generalizable test for detection of mutations affecting Tn10 transposition. Genetics. 1987 Jun;116(2):185–189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mizuuchi K., Craigie R. Mechanism of bacteriophage mu transposition. Annu Rev Genet. 1986;20:385–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.002125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Studier F. W., Rosenberg A. H., Dunn J. J., Dubendorff J. W. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:60–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES