Abstract
The availability of high quality resources is an important factor driving community structure and reproductive mode of animals. Parthenogenetic reproduction prevails when resources are available in excess, whereas sexuality correlates with resource shortage. We investigated the effect of resource availability on the community structure of oribatid mites in a laboratory experiment. Availability of food resources was increased by addition of glucose to leaf litter and reduced by leaching of nutrients from leaf litter. Experimental systems were incubated at three different temperatures to establish different regimes of resource exploitation. Community structure of oribatids and numbers of eggs per female were measured over a period of ten months. We expected the density of oribatid mites to decline in the reduced litter quality treatment but to increase in the glucose treatment. Both effects were assumed to be more pronounced at higher temperatures. We hypothesized sexual species to be less affected than parthenogenetic species by reduced resource quality due to higher genetic diversity allowing more efficient exploitation of limited resources, but to be outnumbered by parthenogenetic species in case of resource addition due to faster reproduction. In contrast to our hypotheses, both sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mite species responded similarly with their densities declining uniformly during incubation. The parthenogenetic Brachychthoniidae and Tectocepheus dominated early in the experiment but were replaced later by parthenogenetic Desmonomata and Rhysotritia. In parthenogenetic species the number of eggs per female increased during the experiment while the number of eggs in sexual females remained constant or decreased slightly; in general, egg numbers were higher in sexual than in parthenogenetic species. The results indicate that for sustaining oribatid mite populations other resources than litter and associated saprotrophic microorganisms are needed. They also indicate that there are two groups of parthenogenetically reproducing species: exploiters of easily available resources and consumers of leaf litter associated resources.
Introduction
The amount and availability of resources is one of the most important factors structuring animal communities. In addition to changing population density and community structure it also influences the reproductive mode of animals. Parthenogenesis dominates when resources are available in excess whereas sexuality correlates with resource shortage [1], [2]. Theoretical models explaining the prevalence of sex in the animal kingdom, such as the Tangled Bank [3] or Lottery Models [4], imply that the response of individuals with different genotypes to environmental heterogeneity differs. Sexual species are likely to occupy a wider range of environmental conditions and to exploit a wider range of resources as they include diverse genotypes due to outcrossing and recombination [1]. Consequently, theory predicts the dominance of sexuality in unstable habitats with varying environmental conditions [4]–[6]. On the other hand, parthenogenesis should be favoured in stable habitats (such as the litter layer or deep soil) with constant availability of resources [2]. Fluctuations in resource quantity and quality therefore are likely to influence the predominance of sexual or parthenogenetic taxa [7], [8]; that sexuality in fact often is associated with resource shortage is exemplified by cyclical parthenogenesis such as in aphids and cladocerans switching to sexual reproduction when resources diminish by the end of the season [1], [9].
Recent theoretical considerations suggest that sex prevails when resources are difficult to obtain and in short supply, implying that exploited resources will not be available to the same extent and same quality to the consumer in the next generation [2], [10]. Based on these considerations parthenogenesis is favoured when death rates are high, resources are homogeneous, resources regenerate fast or several genetically diverse parthenogenetic species cover the entire spectrum of resources. Accordingly, the higher percentage of parthenogenetic species in forest soils as compared to other terrestrial ecosystems is likely due to ample availability of resources with resources being “regenerated” in pulses via litter material [11]–[13] and root associated materials such as exudates and mycorrhizal fungi [14], [15]. The variety of food resources available, including leaf and root litter, bacteria, fungi, algae and lichens, allows the coexistence of a large number of soil meso- and macrofauna species [16], [17]. However, it is puzzling why in many soil taxa sexually and parthenogenetically reproducing species of close taxonomic affiliation and similar trophic niche coexist in the same habitat [18]–[20].
An important soil-dwelling group of microarthropods are oribatid mites (Oribatida, Acari). They play a key role in decomposition of litter and consume a variety of food resources [17]. A remarkable feature of this speciose group of soil invertebrates is the high incidence of parthenogenesis; about 10% of all oribatid mite species have abandoned sex [21] and in forest soils of the temperate and boreal zone typically 60–80% of the individuals reproduce by parthenogenesis [21]–[25]. Based on the high percentage of parthenogenesis and the high age [26]–[29], some taxa of oribatid mites join bdelloid rotifers [30] and darwinulid ostracods [31] as “ancient asexual scandals” [32], [33], challenging evolutionary theories that predict the extinction of parthenogenetic species in the long-term. The ubiquity of oribatid mites, their high abundance in forest soils and the co-existence of sexual and parthenogenetic species in the same habitat coupled with a complexity of K- and r-selected life cycles [21], [34]–[36], presents oribatid mites as ideal model group for investigating evolutionary questions, such as the advantage of sexual reproduction.
One possible explanation for the coexistence of sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mite species in forests is that they colonize different microhabitats. Indeed, oribatid mite species on the bark of trees are mainly sexual [37], whereas parthenogenetic species predominantly live in soil [19], [24], [25]. This correlates with the assumption that sex prevails in unstable habitats (the bark of trees) [38] while parthenogenesis is favoured when conditions are stable as it is the case in soil; recent studies on oribatid mites have shown that parthenogenetic taxa indeed suffer more from resource limitation than sexual species [25].
The present study investigates the influence of changes in the availability of resources on oribatid mite density, community structure and reproductive mode at different temperatures in a laboratory microcosm experiment. Therefore, treatments with untreated litter material, with litter of reduced quality and with glucose-enriched high quality litter material were established. Microcosms were incubated at different temperatures as we expected effects to be more pronounced at higher temperatures due to faster exploitation of resources and accelerated reproduction. In general, we expected the number of specimens to decline in the reduced litter quality treatment due to declining resources but to increase in the glucose enriched treatment due to increased food availability, in particular microorganisms and resources mobilized by them. We hypothesized that parthenogenetically reproducing species will be favoured in the high quality litter treatment due to faster reproduction caused by the avoidance of searching mating partners and investing in the production of males. Consequently, when resources become limiting we expected sexuals to become more dominant at the expense of parthenogenetic species since sexual populations presumably comprise more diverse genotypes allowing more complete resource exploitation.
Materials and Methods
Study site
Soil samples were taken from the Kranichstein forest, located about 8 km northeast of Darmstadt (Germany; 49°53′40.2″N 8°42′23.1″E). The Kranichstein forest is dominated by beech (Fagus sylvatica) interspersed with ca. 190 y old oak (Quercus robur) and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus). The herb layer is dominated by Luzula luzuloides, Milium effusum, Anemone nemorosa and Polytrichum formosum. Parent rock is Rotliegendes covered with sand; the humus form is moder (FAO-UNESCO classification).
For taking the samples, no specific permission was required but prior to sampling the forestry agency of Darmstadt (Forstamt Darmstadt) was informed and agreed. The study did not involve endangered or protected species.
Experimental setup
Soil cores (45 in total; Ø 21 cm L, F, H layer and the upper 3 cm of the Ah layer) were taken from the Kranichstein forest and placed in laboratory microcosms. The litter material of all soil cores was removed, mixed carefully and weighted. Subsequently, equivalent amounts of litter were placed back into the microcosms establishing three treatments with five replicates each: (a) control treatment with untreated litter material, (b) reduced litter quality treatment with litter kept in water at a temperature of 60°C for 24 h to reduce food quality by leaching of easily available carbon compounds, and (c) high quality litter treatment with untreated litter sprinkled with glucose solution as additional carbon source for microorganisms at regular intervals. We expected additional glucose to be beneficial for microorganisms and thereby also for oribatid mites feeding on detritus and associated microorganisms. As baseline first samples for analyzing oribatid mite communities were taken short after the first addition of glucose. Microcosms were incubated at constant 10, 15 and 20°C in darkness. Microcosms were closed with plastic foil at the bottom and with gauze (45 µm) at the top; loss of water was evaluated gravimetrically and replaced by distilled water every week for the control and reduced litter quality treatment or by adding glucose solution for the glucose enriched treatment.
As a measure of the resource status of the microcosms, microbial respiration was measured as CO2 produced and mineralization of carbon was calculated as mg C microcosm−1 week−1. CO2 evolved in the microcosms was trapped in 2 ml alkali (1 M NaOH) in vessels placed on the leaf litter. Trapped CO2 was measured in an aliquot by titration with 0.1 M HCl after precipitation of carbonate with saturated BaCl2 [39]. Microbial C mineralization was used to calculate the amount of carbon produced and subsequently replenished by adding the 2-fold amount of glucose to the glucose treatment.
After 2, 10, 20 and 44 weeks soil cores (Ø 5 cm) were taken from the microcosms, separated into litter and soil (0–3 cm depth) and oribatid mites were extracted by heat [40], [41]; holes in soil were filled with sand. Oribatid mites were counted and determined to species level if possible. In addition, adults were sexed, and in females the number of eggs was counted to compare egg production between parthenogenetic and sexual species. Species were considered to be sexual when there were more than 5% males. Brachychthoniidae, Phthiracaridae and Suctobelbidae were difficult to sex; females could only be identified if they carried eggs. The mode of reproduction in these taxa was inferred from the literature [24].
Aggregation of species
Species of adult oribatid mites were aggregated into ten subgroups according to phylogenetic relationships and the inferred mode of reproduction: (1) Brachychthoniidae (parthenogenetic, including undetermined Brachychthoniidae, Brachychthonius berlesei, Liochthonius sp. and Sellnickochthonius honestus), (2) Enarthronota (parthenogenetic, comprising only Eniochthonius minutissimus; excluding Brachychthoniidae), (3) Phthiracaridae (undetermined species, mainly sexual, except Rhysotritia duplicata), (4) Rhysotritia duplicata (parthenogenetic), (5) Desmonomata (parthenogenetic, comprising Malaconothrus gracilis, Nanhermannia coronata, N. nana and Nothrus silvestris), (6) Tectocepheus (parthenogenetic, comprising T. minor, T. sarekensis and T. velatus), (7) Suctobelbidae (parthenogenetic, including undetermined Suctobelbidae, Suctobelbella subcornigera and S. subtrigona), (8) parthenogenetic Oppiidae (including Oppiella nova and Microppia minus), (9) sexual Oppiidae (including Berniniella sigma, Disshorina ornata and Medioppia subpectinata) and (10) other Circumdehiscentiae (sexual, including Achipteria coleoptrata, Cultroribula bicultrata, Carabodes femoralis, C. ornatus, Galumna lanceata, Ophidiotrichus tectus, Oribatula tibialis, Minunthozetes semirufus and Banksinoma lanceata). For full species names see Table S1.
Statistical analysis
For statistical analyses specimens of the litter and soil layer were combined; the great majority of individuals occurred in the litter layer. Changes in time of microbial C mineralization, density of total oribatid mites, density of subgroups of oribatid mites, percentages of parthenogenetic individuals, and numbers of eggs per female were analysed by repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) or repeated measures general linear models (RM-GLM) in SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, USA), with time as repeated and treatment and temperature as categorical factors [42]; changes in density of oribatid mite subgroups were previously analysed for the interaction between time, taxa, treatment and temperature by a double repeated ANOVA with the repeated factors “taxa” and “time”.
Further, changes in oribatid mite community composition were analysed by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) [43] implemented in Statistica (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA). NMDS reduced the number of meaningful dimensions to three which were used as independent factors in a subsequent discriminant function analysis (DFA) to explore effects of time. In addition, data on oribatid mite species were analysed by detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) using CANOCO 4.5 [44].
Abundances of individuals, numbers of eggs per female and data on microbial C mineralization were log(x+1) transformed and percentages of parthenogenetic individuals were arcsin square root transformed prior to statistical analysis to increase homogeneity of variances. Species with fewer than ten individuals in total and species which occurred in less than three samples were excluded from the statistical analyses (Table S1). All data are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Results
Microbial C mineralization
Average daily microbial C mineralization was at a maximum at 20°C (ANOVA, F2,36 = 141.6, P<0.0001 for temperature) and increased after glucose addition (ANOVA, F2,36 = 101.5, P<0.0001 for treatment; Fig. 1a). Cumulative microbial C mineralization per microcosm increased linearly from week 2 to 10 and then continued at lower rates until week 35 (Fig. 1b). This reduction after 12 weeks was less pronounced in the glucose treatment whereas respiration rates in the control and reduced litter quality treatment were similar (RM-ANOVA, F60,540 = 2.35, P<0.0001 for the interaction between time, temperature and treatment).
Density and community composition of oribatid mites
In total, 25,639 oribatid mites were inspected; 12,224 individuals were juvenile and not determined further. The 13,415 adult oribatid mites represented 33 species and three pooled taxa (undetermined Brachychthoniidae, Phthiracaridae and Suctobelbidae); of these, 13,401 individuals from 28 species and the three pooled taxa were included in the statistical analysis (Table S1).
Among the 28 species included in the analysis 12 were sexual with percentages of females ranging from 29% in Carabodes ornatus to 90% in Cultroribula bicultrata and 16 were parthenogenetic comprising 100% females except in Oppiella nova (98%) and Tectocepheus minor (99%; Table S1). The percentage of total parthenogenetic individuals neither changed with time (RM-GLM, F3,81 = 1.3, P = 0.266) nor differed between treatments (RM-GLM, F2,27 = 2.9, P = 0.074) nor was affected by temperature (RM-GLM, F2,27 = 1.2, P = 0.311); it was on average 84%.
Total abundance of adult oribatid mites decreased significantly with time (RM-ANOVA, F3,132 = 93.3, P<0.0001), mainly between week 10 and 20 (RM-ANOVA, F1,44 = 37.8, P<0.0001) and 20 and 44 (RM-ANOVA, F1,44 = 102.7, P<0.0001; Fig. 2a). It was neither significantly affected by treatment (RM-ANOVA, F2,36<0.1, P = 0.985) nor by temperature (RM-ANOVA, F2,36 = 0.6, P = 0.542). Parthenogenetic Oppiidae, Tectocepheus spp. and Desmonomata were most abundant while Brachychthoniidae, Rhysotritia, sexual Oppiidae and Phthiracaridae were least abundant (Table S1, Fig. 3). Total numbers of juvenile oribatid mites also significantly decreased with time at 10 and 15°C but remained constant at 20°C (RM-ANOVA, F3,108 = 30.5, P<0.0001 for time and F6,108 = 4.7; P = 0.0003 for the interaction between time and treatment; Fig. 2b).
Since the interaction between time, taxa, treatment and temperature was significant (double repeated ANOVA with the repeated factors taxa and time, F108,972 = 1.4, P = 0.009), the development of all ten oribatid mite subgroups was analyzed separately. Subgroups of oribatid mites changed significantly with time but responded differently to treatment and temperature (Table 1, Fig. 3). In sexuals, Circumdehiscentiae and Phthiracaridae similarly responded to the treatments at each of the temperatures; while total abundance of Circumdehiscentiae significantly decreased with time, total numbers of Phthiracaridae slightly increased. Sexual Oppiidae responded significantly to time, temperature and treatment. Abundances generally declined in the control treatment while they increased until week 10 and declined thereafter in the glucose treatment at 10 and 15 but not at 20°C. The response in the reduced litter quality treatment varied with temperature; while abundances increased until week 20 and declined thereafter at 10°C, they continuously declined at 15°C, but recovered to week 44 at 20°C.
Table 1. F- and P-values on the effect of time (2, 10, 20 and 44 weeks), temperature (temp; 10, 15, 20°C) and treatment (tr; control, reduced litter quality and glucose addition) of the density of ten pooled oribatid mite groups analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance.
Brachychthoniidae | Enarthronota | Rhysotritia | Desmonomata | ||||||
df | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
between subject effects | |||||||||
temp | 2,36 | 3.72 | 0.0340 | 0.48 | 0.6241 | 4.77 | 0.0145 | 1.92 | 0.1612 |
tr | 2,36 | 0.42 | 0.0551 | 0.33 | 0.7239 | 8.29 | 0.0011 | 2.35 | 0.1100 |
temp x tr | 4,36 | 3.92 | 0.0097 | 0.19 | 0.9430 | 0.72 | 0.5850 | 1.26 | 0.3051 |
within subject effects | |||||||||
time | 3,108 | 35.08 | <0.0001 | 33.94 | <0.0001 | 3.70 | 0.0139 | 3.84 | 0.0118 |
time x temp | 6,108 | 2.95 | 0.0105 | 2.01 | 0.0711 | 1.34 | 0.2439 | 3.79 | 0.0018 |
time x tr | 6,108 | 0.48 | 0.8194 | 3.02 | 0.0091 | 1.45 | 0.2014 | 2.90 | 0.0116 |
time x temp x tr | 12,108 | 1.36 | 0.1968 | 1.11 | 0.3569 | 0.84 | 0.6063 | 1.20 | 0.2953 |
Significant effects are given in bold.
In parthenogenetic species the total number of individuals declined with time. Brachychthoniidae, Tectocepheus, Suctobelbidae and parthenogenetic Oppiidae were strongly affected at higher temperatures as indicated by fast decline in total individuals; overall, while densities of Brachychthoniidae, Suctobelbidae and parthenogenetic Oppiidae were at a maximum at 15°C, the density of Tectocepheus was at a maximum at 10°C (Fig. 3). In contrast, the densities of Enarthronota, Rhysotritia and Desmonomata were highest at 20°C, with Desmonomata continuously increasing in the glucose treatment. Enarthronota responded differently to time and treatment. While densities increased from week 2 to 10 but decreased thereafter in control treatments, the decrease was retarded (after week 20) in the reduced litter quality and glucose treatments.
Discriminant function analysis (DFA) indicated significant changes in community structure between week 10 and 20 (F4,29 = 3.6, P = 0.017) and week 20 and 44 (F4,29 = 5.7, P = 0.002). Ordination by detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) further showed a shift in oribatid mite subgroups; while parthenogenetic Brachychthoniidae (e.g., Brachychthonius berlesei, Sellnickochthonius honestus) and the genus Tectocepheus were associated with early sampling dates (Fig. 4), parthenogenetic Desmonomata (e.g., Malaconothrus gracilis, Nanhermannia nana, N. coronata) and the parthenogenetic genus Rhysotritia were associated with later samplings dates. Sexual Phthiracaridae and M. subpectinata also occurred late while sexual Circumdehiscentiae (e.g., Minunthozetes semirufus, Achipteria coleoptrata, Ophidiotrichus tectus) were associated with early to mid sampling dates.
Numbers of eggs
Sexual individuals on average carried significantly more eggs per gravid female (2.21) than parthenogenetic species (1.23; RM-GLM, F1,88 = 183.8, P<0.0001). This held true when including females without eggs (respective values of 1.36 and 0.46; RM-GLM, F1,64 = 168.5, P<0.0001). While the average number of eggs per female (including those without eggs) in parthenogenetic species slightly increased with time, it remained constant in sexual species (RM-GLM, F3,192 = 4.0, P = 0.008 for the interaction between time and reproductive mode). However, the number of eggs changed significantly with time, temperature and treatment (RM-GLM, F12,108 = 2.5, P = 0.006 and F9,45 = 2.7, P = 0.013 for the interaction between time, temperature and treatment in parthenogenetic and sexual species, respectively). In general, in parthenogenetic species the number of eggs increased with time except in the glucose treatment at 15°C (RM-ANOVA, F3,108 = 37.8, P<0.0001; Fig. 5a); the increase was faster and resulted in higher egg numbers at 20°C (RM-ANOVA, F6,108 = 4.2, P = 0.0007 for the interaction between time and temperature; Fig. 5a). In contrast to parthenogenetic species, the number of eggs per female in sexual species (including those without eggs) was higher at lower temperatures with the maximum being at 10°C (RM-GLM, F2,15 = 26.5, P<0.0001; Fig. 5b). Generally, the number of eggs either remained constant (e.g., reduced litter quality treatment at 20°C) or decreased with time (e.g., control at 15°C and 20°C; RM-GLM, F2,15 = 45, P = 0.03 for treatment, F3,13 = 3.2, P = 0.052 for the interaction between temperature and treatment; Fig. 5b).
Discussion
Density and community structure of oribatid mites
In general, almost all parthenogenetic species comprised exclusively females, whereas sexuals had at least 10% males. However, except in few species (e.g., Achipteria coleoptrata and Disshorina ornata), sexual taxa also comprised predominantly females (e.g., 90% in Cultroribula bicultrata and 72% in Oribatula tibialis). Low percentages of females in Carabodes ornatus and Oribatella quadricornuta may be a sampling artifact due to low numbers of individuals analysed.
In the parthenogenetic species Oppiella nova and Tectocepheus minor 2% and 0.7% males were present, respectively. These rare males probably represent non-functional “spanandric” males [45]. As in other parthenogenetic animal species, spanandric males occur in a number of parthenogenetic oribatid mite species within the parthenogenetic species clusters of Enarthronota, Desmonomata and Circumdehiscentiae, e.g., in Hypochthonius rufulus, Nothrus silvestris, Platynothrus peltifer, Trhypochthonius tectorum and Tectocepheus velatus [46], but see [47]. In O. nova males have been reported by Fujikawa [48] with their density varying with season probably due to changes in the availability of food resources. Of the 35 males of O. nova found in the present study 24 occurred in the treatment with reduced litter quality, seven in the untreated control and only four in the high quality litter treatment. This supports the findings of Fujikawa [48] that the occurrence of males in O. nova varies with resource availability and is favoured by resource shortage similar to species reproducing by cyclical parthenogenesis, such as cladocerans [49], [50] and aphids [51], [52].
We expected oribatid mite density to change parallel to resource quality, i.e. to decline in the untreated and reduced litter quality treatment but to increase in the glucose addition treatment in particular at higher temperatures. In contrast to these expectations, the density of oribatid mites uniformly declined in each treatment at each of the temperatures indicating that the addition of glucose did not increase the availability of food resources of oribatid mites. Furthermore, sexual and parthenogenetic species responded similarly, i.e. parthenogenetic species did not outnumber sexuals in the glucose treatment and the number of sexuals declined parallel to the number of parthenogenetic species with increasing resource shortage.
Decline in density due to low rate of reproduction caused by difficulties in finding mating partners is unlikely. The process of finding mating partners in oribatid mites is not well understood, but studies indicate that males deposit spermatophores on the forest floor and females pick them up with their ovipositor without having contact to the male [21], [53]. Small-scale mobility of oribatid mites is high and high frequency of sexual species at low density as shown by Maraun et al. [19] indicates that finding spermatophores is unproblematic. Furthermore, removing a soil core of 5 cm from our 20 cm diameter microcosms unlikely affected oribatid mite communities as Schneider et al. [54] showed that oribatid mite communities are even little affected by being confined into soil cores of a diameter of 5 cm.
The impact of different temperatures on the community fluctuations was not as strong as expected. High temperature, such as 15°C and especially 20°C, may detrimentally affect oribatid mites of temperate forests. However, density and diversity of oribatid mites declined uniformly irrespective of temperature suggesting that mortality was not related to temperature in the temperature range studied [35], [55], [56].
Our expectations were based on the assumption that higher genetic diversity due to outcrossing and recombination allows sexuals to exploit a wider range of resources [2], [10], [32]. Results of previous studies suggested that parthenogenetic species indeed suffer more from resource shortage than sexual species [19], [25], for example at higher altitudes in tropical montane rainforests [20]. Resource availability may also explain the high abundance of parthenogenetic oribatid mite species in soil (with abundant resources) and the prevalence of sexual taxa on the bark of trees (with resources being in short supply) [20], [24], [25], [37]. The fact that in our experiment the density of virtually all taxa declined in each of the treatments indicates that resources uniformly declined and glucose addition did not replenish carbon resource pools used as food substrate by oribatid mites. Indeed, there is increasing evidence that decomposer animals, including oribatid mite species, heavily rely on root derived rather than leaf litter based resources [14], [15].
Despite the rather uniform response of most species in the present study, the community structure of oribatid mites shifted over time: small parthenogenetic species, such as Brachychthoniidae and the genus Tectocepheus, dominated early in the experiment while the larger parthenogenetic Desmonomata and Rhysotritia became more dominant later. Presumably, this reflects different trophic niches of these oribatid mite groups with species of the first group predominantly exploiting easily available food resources whereas species of the latter also exploit recalcitrant litter resources which is confirmed by recent findings based on stable isotope analysis [15], [57].
Numbers of eggs
In agreement with previous studies [25], the number of eggs per female in sexual taxa on average exceeded that in parthenogenetic taxa and this was true throughout the experiment. In sexual species most eggs were produced at low temperatures, indicating higher resource availability at low temperature. In contrast, in parthenogenetic species the average number of eggs per female significantly increased during the experiment and this was independent of the addition of glucose. In general, the number of eggs in parthenogenetic species was at a maximum at high temperature indicating increased reproduction. The increase in egg production during the experiment further indicates that parthenogenetic taxa adjusted the investment in reproduction to alterations in the availability of resources which is consistent with earlier results [25]. The fact that the density of parthenogenetic species declined parallel to that of sexual species despite the number of eggs per female in the former increased indicates that offspring of parthenogenetic species suffered from higher death rates than those of sexuals. However, although sexual taxa produced more eggs than parthenogenetic species, the rates of egg deposition and therefore population growth of sexual vs. parthenogenetic species remains unknown.
Conclusions
Manipulation of resource availability by the addition of glucose neither affected the performance of sexual nor that of parthenogenetic oribatid mites. Rather, both sexually and parthenogenetically reproducing species uniformly suffered during laboratory incubation suggesting that most oribatid mite species rely on root associated resources such as mycorrhiza rather than on detritus and associated saprotrophic fungi. Contrasting the view that parthenogenetic species reproduce faster than sexual species, parthenogenetic oribatid mites produced fewer eggs than sexual species with the number of eggs increasing later in the experiment and at higher temperature, i.e. when resources were depleted. The ability to adjust the investment in reproduction by changing egg production supports the hypothesis that resource availability differentially affects sexually and pathenogenetically reproducing species and therefore the view that the mode of reproduction is intricately bound to the availability of resources.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Verena Eissfeller, Martin Rosenberger and Olaf Butenschön for supporting the performance of the experiments, Roy A. Norton for helpful comments on the manuscript, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All data are included in the mansucript and in a Supporting Information Table.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation SCHE 376/19-1. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Bell G (1982) The Masterpiece of Nature. The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. University of California Press, California. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Scheu S, Drossel B (2007) Sexual reproduction prevails in a world of structured resources in short supply. Proc R Soc B 274: 1225–1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ghiselin MT (1974) The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. University of California Press, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Williams GC (1975) Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Glesener RR, Tilman D (1978) Sexuality and the components of environmental uncertainty: clues from geographic parthenogenesis in terrestrial animals. American Naturalist 112: 659–673. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hamilton WD (1980) Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35: 282–290. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Korpelainen H (1990) Sex ratios and conditions required for environmental sex determination in animals. Biol Rev 65: 147–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Song Y, Drossel B, Scheu S (2011) Tangled Bank dismissed too early. Oikos 120: 1601–1607. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Redfield RJ (1999) A truly pluralistic view of sex and recombination. J Evol Biol 12: 1043–1046. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Song Y, Scheu S, Drossel B (2012) The ecological advantage of sexual reproduction in multicellular long-lived organisms. J Evol Biol 25: 556–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fioretto A, Papa S, Fuggi A (2003) Litter-fall and litter decomposition in a low Mediterranean shrubland. Biol Fertil Soils 39: 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK (2005) A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 634–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. McNaughton SJ, Osterheld M, Frank DA, Williams KJ (1989) Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature 341: 142–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Pollierer MM, Langel R, Körner C, Maraun M, Scheu S (2007) The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. Ecol Letters 10: 729–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Eissfeller V, Beyer F, Valtanen K, Hertel D, Maraun M, et al. (2013) Incorporation of plant carbon and microbial nitrogen into the rhizosphere food web of beech and ash. Soil Biol Biochem 62: 76–81. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schaefer M (1991) The animal community: diversity and resources.- In: Röhrig E, Ulrich B, editors. Temperate Deciduous Forests. Ecosystems of the World 7 . Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 51–120. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schneider K, Migge S, Norton RA, Scheu S, Langel R, et al. (2004) Trophic niche differentiation in soil microarthropods (Oribatida, Acari): evidence from stable isotope ratios (15N/14N). - Soil Biol Biochem 36: 1769–1774. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chahartaghi M, Scheu S, Maraun M, Domes K (2009) Resource depletion and colonization: a comparison between parthenogenetic and sexual Collembola species. Pedobiologia 52: 181–189. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Maraun M, Norton RA, Ehnes R, Scheu S, Erdmann G (2012) Positive correlation between density and parthenogenetic reproduction in oribatid mites (Acari) supports structured resource theory of sexual reproduction. Evol Ecol Res 14: 311–323. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Maraun M, Fronczek S, Marian F, Sandmann D, Scheu S (2013) More sex at higher altitudes: Changes in the frequency of parthenogenesis in oribatid mites in tropical montane rain forests. Pedobiologia 56: 185–190. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Norton RA, Palmer SC (1991) The distribution, mechanisms, and evolutionary significance of parthenogenesis in oribatid mites. In: Schuster R, Murphy PW, editors. The Acari: Reproduction, Development and Life-History Strategies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 107–136.
- 22.Norton RA, Kethley JB, Johnston DE, OConnor BM (1993) Phylogenetic perspectives on genetic systems and reproductive modes in mites. In: Wrensch DL, Ebbert MA, editors. Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratios. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 8–99.
- 23. Maraun M, Salamon J-A, Schneider K, Schaefer M, Scheu S (2003) Oribatid mite and collembolan diversity, density and community structure in a moder beech forest (Fagus sylvatica): effects of mechanical perturbations. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 1387–1394. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cianciolo JM, Norton RA (2006) The ecological distribution of reproductive mode in oribatid mites, as related to biological complexity. Exp Appl Acarol 40: 1–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Domes K, Scheu S, Maraun M (2007) Resources and sex: soil re-colonization by sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mites. Pedobiologia 51: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Shear WA, Bonamo M, Grierson JD, Rolfe WDI, Smith EL, et al. (1984) Early land animals in North America: evidence from Devonian age arthropods from Gilboa, New York. Science 224: 492–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Norton RA, Bonamo PM, Grierson JD, Shear WA (1988) Oribatid mite fossils from terrestrial Devonian deposit near Gilboa, New York. J Paleontol 62: , 259–269. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hammer M, Wallwork JA (1979) A review of the world distribution of oribatid mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata) in relation to continental drift. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifterv 22: 1–31. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Heethoff M, Domes K, Laumann M, Maraun M, Norton RA, et al. (2007) High genetic divergences indicate ancient separation of parthenogenetic lineages of the oribatid mite Platynothrus peltifer (Acari, Oribatida). J Evol Biol 20: 392–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Mark Welch DB, Meselson M (2000) Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual reproduction or genetic exchange. Science 288: 1211–1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Martens K, Rossetti G, Horne DJ (2003) How ancient are ancient asexuals? Proc R Soc B 270: 723–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maynard Smith J (1978) The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Judson BD, Normark BB (1996) Ancient asexual scandals. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 41–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Luxton M (1981) Studies on the oribatid mites of a Danish beech wood soil. IV. Developmental Biology. Pedobiologia 40: 312–340. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Travé J, André HM, Taberly G, Bernini F (1996) Les Acariens Oribates. Èditions AGAR, Ètud Acar 1.
- 36. Sovik G, Leinhaas HP (2003) Adult survival and reproduction in an artic mite, Ameronothus lineatus (Acari, Oribatida): effects of temperature and winter cold. Can J Zoo 81: 1579–1588. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Erdmann G, Floren A, Lisenmair KE, Scheu S, Maraun M (2006) Effects of forest age on oribatid mites from the bark of trees. Pedobiologia 50: 433–441. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Nicolai V (1986) The bark of trees: thermal properties, microclimate and fauna. Oecologia 69: 148–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Macfadyen A (1970) Simple methods for measuring and maintaining the proportion of carbon dioxide in air, for use in ecological studies of soil respiration. Soil Biol Biochem 2: 9–18. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Macfadyen A (1961) Improved funnel-type extractors for soil arthropods. J Animal Ecol 30: 171–184. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kempson D, Llyod M, Ghelardi R (1963) A new extractor for woodland litter. Pedobiologia 3: 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Scheiner S, Gurevitch MJ (2001) Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. 2nd edition.-Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kruskal JB (1964) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 115–129. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (1998) CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to CANOCO for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA.
- 45. Taberly G (1988) Recherches sur la parthénogenèse thélythoque de deux espèces d'acariens oribatides: Trhypochthonius tectorum (Berlese) et Platynothrus peltifer (Koch). IV Observations sur les mâles ataviques. Acarologia 29: 95–107. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Grandjean F (1941) Statistique sexuelle et parthénogenèse chez les Oribates (Acariens). Comptes Rendus des Seances de l' Academie des Sciences 212: 463–467. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Fujikawa T (1988a) Biology of Tectocepheus velatus (Michael) and T. cuspidentatus Knülle. Acarologia 29: 307–315. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Fujikawa T (1988b) Biological features of Oppiella nova (Oudemans) in a nature farming field. Edaphologia 38: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Young JPW (1979) Enzyme polymorphism and cyclic parthenogenesis in Daphnia magna. I. Selection and Clonal Diversity. Genetics 92: 953–970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lynch M, Spitze K (1994) Evolutionary genetics of Daphnia. In: Real LA, editor. Ecological Genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 109–128. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Rhomberg LR, Joseph S, Singh RS (1985) Seasonal variation and clonal selection in cyclically parthenogenetic rose aphids (Macrosiphium rosea). Canadian J Genet Cytol 27: 224–232. [Google Scholar]
- 52. De Barro PJ, Sherratt TN, Brookes CP, David O, Andmaclean N (1995) Spatial and temporal genetic variation in British field populations of the grain aphid Sitobion avenae (F.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) studied using RAPD-PCR. Proc R Soc B 262: 321–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Palmer SC, Norton RA (1992) Genetic diversity in thelytokous oribatid mites (Acari: Acariformes: Oribatida). Biochem Syst Ecol 20: 219–231. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Schneider K, Scheu S, Maraun M (2007) Microarthropod density and diversity respond little to spatial isolation. Basic Appl Ecol 8: 26–35. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Scheu S, Schulz E (1996) Secondary succession, soil formation and development of a diverse community of oribatid mites and saprophagous soil macro-invertebrates. Biodiv Cons 5: 235–250. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Maraun M, Scheu S (2000) The structure of oribatid mite communities (Acari, Oribatida): patterns, mechanisms and implications for future research. Ecography 23: 374–383. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Maraun M, Erdmann G, Fischer BM, Pollierer MM, Norton RA, et al. (2011) Stable isotopes revisited: Their use and limits for oribatid mite trophic ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 877–882. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All data are included in the mansucript and in a Supporting Information Table.