Skip to main content
JAK-STAT logoLink to JAK-STAT
. 2014 Jun 12;3(2):e29510. doi: 10.4161/jkst.29510

Effects of JAK2-STAT3 signaling after cerebral insults

Daniel J Raible 1,*, Lauren C Frey 2, Amy R Brooks-Kayal 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC4124058  PMID: 25105066

Abstract

The JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway has been shown to regulate the expression of genes involved in cell survival, cell proliferation, cell-cycle progression, and angiogenesis in development and after cerebral insults. Until recently, little has been known about the effects of this pathway activation after cerebral insults and if blocking this pathway leads to better recovery. This review exams the role of this pathway after 3 cerebral insults (traumatic brain injury, stroke, and status epilepticus).

Keywords: JAK2-STAT3, traumatic brain injury, stroke, status epilepticus, preclinical injuries

Introduction

Cerebral insults such as a traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, or status epilepticus (SE) can lead to detrimental outcomes for patients who suffer from one of these events. All of these insults have been shown to cause acute cell death, disruption of the blood brain barrier, reduced neurological functional performance and altered cellular signaling within the injured tissue. One signaling pathway that has been shown to be activated after all of these cerebral insults is the Janus kinase 2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (JAK2-STAT3) signaling pathway. This pathway activates numerous genes responsible for many cellular functions that may play a critical role in both neural injury and repair; however, the precise contribution of JAK2-STAT3 activation after TBI, stroke, and SE remains incompletely understood.

When the JAK2-STAT3 pathway is activated after cerebral insults, it leads to the increased expression of genes associated with cell proliferation, differentiation and survival.1-6 Activation of this pathway occurs when a hormone, growth factor or cytokine binds to a receptor which then phosphorylates JAK2. JAK2 in turn phosphorylates STAT3, which then dimerizes and translocates to the nucleus where it binds to the promotor region of genes containing gamma-activated sequences. In the adult nervous system, this pathway is mostly dormant unless the central nervous system suffers a stressor or insult. The insult, whether a TBI, stroke, or SE, leads to release of hormones, growth factors and cytokines which result in activation of this pathway. This review will examine the effects of JAK2-STAT3 activation in each of these injury models and how altering this pathway after these cerebral insults effects neurological recovery in preclinical models.

JAK2-STAT3 Activation after TBI

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals under the age of 45.7 TBI causes a host of health issues including cognitive and motor defects as well as posttraumatic epilepsy.8-11 These adverse outcomes significantly decrease the quality of life for individuals who suffer TBI and new therapies are needed. One approach is to identify and disrupt the cellular and molecular changes that contribute to these adverse outcomes. The JAK2-STAT3 pathway has been shown to become activated after TBI in several different experimental models. Although there are several differences in the method of experimental TBI, the current findings all show that there is an increase in the phosphorylation of JAK2 and/or STAT3 within the injured tissue as early as 3 h after injury.3,4,12-14 Several groups have also shown that many known STAT3 genes have increased expression after experimental TBI,3-6,12 however, the effect of JAK2-STAT3 pathway modulation on outcome is variable.

Zhao et al. 2011 has been able to partially block JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation 3 h after a TBI with administration of the JAK2 inhibitor AG490. They also determined that neurological recovery was worsened with the administration of AG490 after a TBI. This same group also found that giving human recombinant erythropoietin (rhEPO) after a TBI increased JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation and decreased apoptosis of cortical cells in peri-injured cortex cells of rats after an experimental TBI. When they added both rhEPO and the JAK2 inhibitor AG490 they found that pJAK2 and pSTAT3 levels were reduced and that the mRNA levels of several apoptosis related genes were increased while they did not see a difference in TUNEL staining. Their findings suggest that activation of the JAK2-STAT3 pathway after a TBI is advantageous for neuronal recovery.

While several groups have investigated inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor regulation, specifically GABA(A) receptor regulation, after a TBI, Raible et al. has found a correlation between pSTAT3 levels and GABAAR α1 after an experimental TBI, suggesting that activation of this pathway may lead to altered inhibitory signaling.12 Since one of the sequelae of a TBI is the subsequent development of epilepsy, preventing this alteration of inhibitory signaling after injury could inhibit the development of post traumatic epilepsy.

JAK2-STAT3 Activation after Stroke

Within developed countries, stroke is the leading cause of death and disability and beyond the immediate 4–6 h after an acute ischemic stroke, there is no known therapy that improves outcomes for this illness.15 Numerous pathological events such as necrosis, apoptosis, edema, and altered cellular signaling occur after cerebral ischemia as well as after subdural hematomas.16 As with TBI, several groups have shown that the JAK2-STAT3 pathway is activated in in vitro and in vivo experimental models of stroke.17-25 While all of the research to this point has shown that there is an increase in phosphorylation of JAK2 and/or STAT3 after stroke, there are conflicting data whether this pathway activation leads to improved neurological recovery.

Several groups have found that treating animals with hypoxic preconditioning, rhEPO, or other novel compounds increased the activation of the JAK2-STAT3 pathway and improved neurological recovery after experimental stroke.18,22 Furthermore, some investigators have blocked JAK2-STAT3 phosphorylation with AG490 or WP1066 (an analog of AG490) and found that cell death markers or functional performance were worsened.18,19,22 These findings suggest that treatments that activate the JAK2-STAT3 pathway after experimental stroke may lead to improved functional performance and/or decreased cell death.

On the contrary, Satriotomo et al. found that administration of the JAK2 inhibitor AG490 or a STAT3 siRNA after experimental cerebral ischemia decreased infarction volume, neuronal damage, apoptosis, and GFAP-positive cells.14 These results suggest that activation of the JAK2-STAT3 pathway leads to decreased cerebral recovery and that blocking this pathway leads to better neurological outcomes. The jury thus remains out and further studies are required to determine the functional effects of JAK2-STAT3 pathway activation following cerebral ischemia.

JAK2-STAT3 Activation after SE

Status epilepticus (SE) is clinically defined as the occurrence of a single unremitting seizure with a duration longer than 15–30 min or frequent clinical seizures without interictal return to baseline lasting at least 15–30 min. SE is a common life-threatening neurological disorder that is seen most commonly in the pediatric population.26-30 Individuals who have had SE may experience morbidities including cognitive impairment, epilepsy, and recurrent SE.27,31 Pilocarpine or kainic acid induced SE in rodents is a common model used by researchers to study the mechanisms underlying epilepsy development or epileptogenesis. These SE models mimic human SE and result in rodents that have similar morbidities as humans.32-35

As with both TBI and stroke, several studies have found that the JAK2-STAT3 pathway is activated in the hippocampus as early as 1 h after experimental SE and that several known STAT3 regulated genes are activated.1,36-38 Two reports have shown JAK2-STAT3 activation can be blocked pharmacologically (by WP1066 or Pyridone 6) and prevent some STAT3-related genes from being activated.1,20 These STAT3 regulated genes are involved in GABAAR subunit regulation, cell survival, cell proliferation, and cell cycling. Grabenstatter et al. found that when STAT3 phosphorylation was blocked during SE, the severity of the subsequent epilepsy was reduced in the rat pilocarpine model.1 This may suggest that JAK2-STAT3 activation after SE at least partially contributes to the subsequent development of epilepsy. This same study also found that after administration of WP1066, there was no difference in FJB staining; suggesting that cell death was not altered by blocking JAK2-STAT3 activation after insult.1

Conclusion

Multiple types of cerebral insults, including TBI, stroke and SE, have been shown to activate the JAK2-STAT3 pathway and increase expression of STAT3 related genes involved in cellular proliferation, differentiation, survival and inhibitory neurotransmission (Fig. 1). However, there are conflicting reports on the effects of blocking this pathway. Some have reported worsened neurological recovery when blocking this pathway, while others have demonstrated advantageous effects. Further investigation is needed to determine if it is feasible to selectively block only certain genes downstream of the JAK2-STAT3 pathway to prevent the deleterious effects associated with activation of this pathway while maintaining the beneficial neuroprotective effects of JAK2-STAT3 pathway activation.

graphic file with name jkst-3-e29510-g1.jpg

Figure 1. Overview of JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway after cerebral insults. Traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and status epilepticus (SE) injury models have shown that the JAK2-STAT3 pathway becomes activated which is indicated either by the increased phosphorylation of JAK2 and/or STAT3.1,3,4,10-12,15-23,34-36 When JAK2-STAT3 becomes phosphorylated it results in the increased expression of STAT3 related genes involved in cell proliferation,1,4-6 cellular differentiation,1,4-6 cell survival,1,3-6,15,20 and inhibitory neurotransmission.1,10,34

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

The funding for this research was provided by the Department of Defense award number W81XWH-11–1-0501 and by NIH/NCRR Colorado CTSI Grant Number TL1 RR025778. Contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.

10.4161/jkst.29510

References

  • 1.Grabenstatter HL, Del Angel YC, Carlsen J, Wempe MF, White AM, Cogswell M, Russek SJ, Brooks-Kayal AR. The effect of STAT3 inhibition on status epilepticus and subsequent spontaneous seizures in the pilocarpine model of acquired epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;62:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fu W, Liao X, Ruan J, Li X, Chen L, Wang B, Wang K, Zhou J. Recombinant human erythropoietin preconditioning attenuates liver ischemia reperfusion injury through the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/AKT/endothelial nitric oxide synthase pathway. J Surg Res. 2013;183:876–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhao J, Li G, Zhang Y, Su X, Hang C. The potential role of JAK2/STAT3 pathway on the anti-apoptotic effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) after experimental traumatic brain injury of rats. Cytokine. 2011;56:343–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oliva AA, Jr., Kang Y, Sanchez-Molano J, Furones C, Atkins CM. STAT3 signaling after traumatic brain injury. J Neurochem. 2012;120:710–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White TE, Ford GD, Surles-Zeigler MC, Gates AS, Laplaca MC, Ford BD. Gene expression patterns following unilateral traumatic brain injury reveals a local pro-inflammatory and remote anti-inflammatory response. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:282. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Raghavendra Rao VL, Dhodda VK, Song G, Bowen KK, Dempsey RJ. Traumatic brain injury-induced acute gene expression changes in rat cerebral cortex identified by GeneChip analysis. J Neurosci Res. 2003;71:208–19. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:375–8. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Frey LC. Epidemiology of posttraumatic epilepsy: a critical review. Epilepsia. 2003;44(Suppl 10):11–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s10.4.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Diaz-Arrastia R, Agostini MA, Madden CJ, Van Ness PC. Posttraumatic epilepsy: the endophenotypes of a human model of epileptogenesis. Epilepsia. 2009;50(Suppl 2):14–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.02006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Salazar AM, Jabbari B, Vance SC, Grafman J, Amin D, Dillon JD. Epilepsy after penetrating head injury. I. Clinical correlates: a report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study. Neurology. 1985;35:1406–14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.35.10.1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marcikić M, Melada A, Kovacević R. Management of war penetrating craniocerebral injuries during the war in Croatia. Injury. 1998;29:613–8. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00146-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raible DJ, Frey LC, Cruz Del Angel Y, Russek SJ, Brooks-Kayal AR. GABA(A) receptor regulation after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:2548–54. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhao JB, Zhang Y, Li GZ, Su XF, Hang CH. Activation of JAK2/STAT pathway in cerebral cortex after experimental traumatic brain injury of rats. Neurosci Lett. 2011;498:147–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guo D, Zeng L, Brody DL, Wong M. Rapamycin attenuates the development of posttraumatic epilepsy in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen YC, Wu JS, Yang ST, Huang CY, Chang C, Sun GY, Lin TN. Stroke, angiogenesis and phytochemicals. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2012;4:599–610. doi: 10.2741/S287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA. Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22:391–7. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01401-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang G, Zhou D, Wang C, Gao Y, Zhou Q, Qian G, DeCoster MA. Hypoxic preconditioning suppresses group III secreted phospholipase A2-induced apoptosis via JAK2-STAT3 activation in cortical neurons. J Neurochem. 2010;114:1039–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu H, Zou L, Tian J, Du G, Gao Y. SMND-309, a novel derivative of salvianolic acid B, protects rat brains ischemia and reperfusion injury by targeting the JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;714:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sun JJ, Liu Y, Ye ZR. Effects of P2Y1 receptor on glial fibrillary acidic protein and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor production of astrocytes under ischemic condition and the related signaling pathways. Neurosci Bull. 2008;24:231–43. doi: 10.1007/s12264-008-0430-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Satriotomo I, Bowen KK, Vemuganti R. JAK2 and STAT3 activation contributes to neuronal damage following transient focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurochem. 2006;98:1353–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Osuka K, Watanabe Y, Usuda N, Atsuzawa K, Shima H, Takeuchi M, Yasuda M, Takayasu M. Activation of JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway in chronic subdural hematoma outer membranes. Neurosci Lett. 2013;534:166–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou TF, Yu JG. Recombinant human erythropoietin attenuates neuronal apoptosis and cognitive defects via JAK2/STAT3 signaling in experimental endotoxemia. J Surg Res. 2013;183:304–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Planas AM, Soriano MA, Berruezo M, Justicia C, Estrada A, Pitarch S, Ferrer I. Induction of Stat3, a signal transducer and transcription factor, in reactive microglia following transient focal cerebral ischaemia. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:2612–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suzuki S, Tanaka K, Nogawa S, Dembo T, Kosakai A, Fukuuchi Y. Phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (Stat3) after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Exp Neurol. 2001;170:63–71. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi JS, Kim SY, Cha JH, Choi YS, Sung KW, Oh ST, Kim ON, Chung JW, Chun MH, Lee SB, et al. Upregulation of gp130 and STAT3 activation in the rat hippocampus following transient forebrain ischemia. Glia. 2003;41:237–46. doi: 10.1002/glia.10186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Loddenkemper T, Goodkin HP. Treatment of pediatric status epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2011;13:560–73. doi: 10.1007/s11940-011-0148-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maytal J, Shinnar S, Moshé SL, Alvarez LA. Low morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus in children. Pediatrics. 1989;83:323–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chin RF, Neville BG, Peckham C, Bedford H, Wade A, Scott RC, NLSTEPSS Collaborative Group Incidence, cause, and short-term outcome of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood: prospective population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:222–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.DeLorenzo RJ, Hauser WA, Towne AR, Boggs JG, Pellock JM, Penberthy L, Garnett L, Fortner CA, Ko D. A prospective, population-based epidemiologic study of status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia. Neurology. 1996;46:1029–35. doi: 10.1212/WNL.46.4.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Loddenkemper T, Syed TU, Ramgopal S, Gulati D, Thanaviratananich S, Kothare SV, Alshekhlee A, Koubeissi MZ. Risk factors associated with death in in-hospital pediatric convulsive status epilepticus. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barnard C, Wirrell E. Does status epilepticus in children cause developmental deterioration and exacerbation of epilepsy? J Child Neurol. 1999;14:787–94. doi: 10.1177/088307389901401204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ben-Ari Y, Lagowska J. [Epileptogenic action of intra-amygdaloid injection of kainic acid] C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1978;287:813–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ben-Ari Y, Lagowska J, Tremblay E, Le Gal La Salle G. A new model of focal status epilepticus: intra-amygdaloid application of kainic acid elicits repetitive secondarily generalized convulsive seizures. Brain Res. 1979;163:176–9. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90163-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lévesque M, Avoli M. The kainic acid model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:2887–99. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pitkänen A, Kharatishvili I, Karhunen H, Lukasiuk K, Immonen R, Nairismägi J, Gröhn O, Nissinen J. Epileptogenesis in experimental models. Epilepsia. 2007;48(Suppl 2):13–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lund IV, Hu Y, Raol YH, Benham RS, Faris R, Russek SJ, Brooks-Kayal AR. BDNF selectively regulates GABAA receptor transcription by activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Sci Signal. 2008;1:ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.1162396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Choi JS, Kim SY, Park HJ, Cha JH, Choi YS, Kang JE, Chung JW, Chun MH, Lee MY. Upregulation of gp130 and differential activation of STAT and p42/44 MAPK in the rat hippocampus following kainic acid-induced seizures. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003;119:10–8. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2003.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xu Z, Xue T, Zhang Z, Wang X, Xu P, Zhang J, Lei X, Li Y, Xie Y, Wang L, et al. Role of signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 in up-regulation of GFAP after epilepsy. Neurochem Res. 2011;36:2208–15. doi: 10.1007/s11064-011-0576-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAK-STAT are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES