Abstract
T cells control the focus and extent of adaptive immunity in infectious and pathological diseases. The activation of T cells occurs when the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) and costimulatory and/or adhesion receptors are engaged by their ligands. This process drives signaling that promotes cytoskeletal rearrangement and transcription factor activation, both of which regulate the quality and magnitude of the T cell response. However, it is not fully understood how different receptor-induced signals combine to alter T cell activation. The related non-receptor tyrosine kinases focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) are phosphorylated downstream of the TCR and several costimulatory and adhesion receptors. FAK family proteins integrate receptor-mediated signals that influence actin cytoskeletal rearrangement and effector T cell responses. In this review, we summarize the receptor-specific roles that FAK and Pyk2 control to influence T cell development and activation.
Keywords: T cells, FAK, Pyk2, signal transduction, Csk, cytoskeletal rearrangement
Introduction
T cells are critical regulators of the adaptive immune response to foreign antigens. After an infection occurs, pathogen-derived components promote antigen-presenting cell (APC) activation, which leads to the subsequent processing and presentation of pathogen-derived peptides in the context of major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) [1, 2]. In secondary lymphoid tissues or at sites of infection, APCs interact with T cells that express antigen-specific T cell antigen receptors (TCRs). To facilitate this process, adhesion and costimulatory receptors, including CD28, CD44, leukocyte factor of adhesion (LFA)-1 and very late antigen (VLA)-4, are also activated on T cells [1–5]. The integration of these receptor-mediated signals leads to the secretion of cytokines, alterations in the expression of intracellular and surface proteins and enhancement of T cell proliferation and survival [3, 6]. These events are critical to promote adaptive immune response-mediated pathogen clearance and to induce T cell memory development. Unfortunately, dysregulation of TCR, adhesion receptor, and/or costimulatory signals also induces aberrant T cell activation that contributes to asthma, allergy, transplanted organ rejection, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders, and cancer progression [1, 2, 4].
Because co-stimulatory and adhesion receptors cooperate with the TCR to induce effective T cell responses, investigators have aimed to identify what proteins mediate TCR and costimulatory/adhesion receptor signaling crosstalk. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK; gene name Protein Tyrosine Kinase 2 (PTK2)) and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2; gene name Protein Tyrosine Kinase 2 β (PTK2β)) are non-receptor tyrosine kinases that are phosphorylated downstream of the TCR and various costimulatory or adhesion receptors, but are also activated by cytokine and chemokine receptors [7–21]. Pyk2 is also called cellular adhesion kinase (CAK)β [22], related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK) [23], calcium-dependent tyrosine kinase (CADTK) [24], and FAK2 [25]. FAK is expressed at various levels in all tissues, while Pyk2 expression is restricted to neurons, epithelial cells, and hematopoietic cells [19, 24, 26]. Hematopoietic cells also express a splice variant of Pyk2 called Pyk2-H [13, 27, 28], which will be discussed in more detail below. Here, we review our current understanding of the roles that FAK and Pyk2 serve in receptor-mediated functions that control T cell development and mature T cell activation.
Structure of FAK and Pyk2
FAK and Pyk2 are 46% identical and 65% similar at the amino acid level. These kinases have an N-terminal four point ezrin/radixin/moesin (FERM) domain, a central tyrosine kinase domain, and a C-terminal focal adhesion targeting (FAT) domain [29]. The FERM domain facilitates the interaction of FAK and/or Pyk2 to growth-factor receptors, phospholipids, and additional proteins that are reviewed elsewhere [30, 31, 29]. The FAT domain binds to the intracellular domains of integrins to directly or indirectly recruit FAK or Pyk2 to focal adhesions [31, 29, 19]. Structural studies have revealed that FAK is auto-inhibited by an intra-molecular interaction between the FERM and kinase domains (Figure 1). This inhibition is released when the FERM domain binds to other proteins and FAK Y397 is phosphorylated [30, 31]. FAK and Pyk2 also have several proline-rich sequences near their FERM and FAT domains that bind SH3 domain-containing proteins, including the adaptor protein, p130Cas and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), Vav1 [32, 33]. Pyk2-H, the more abundantly expressed isoform of Pyk2 in immune cells, lacks 42 amino acids and expresses a truncated proline-rich region near its C-terminus [13, 28, 27]. Pyk2-H thus associates with distinct signaling proteins compared to full-length Pyk2 [34, 13].
Figure 1.
Domain structure of FAK and Pyk2-H, the predominant Pyk2 isoform expressed in T cells. Black circles indicate phosphorylation sites, and PPPP represent proline-rich regions. PP is the truncated proline-rich region expressed in Pyk2-H. Proteins that interact with FAK and Pyk2/Pyk2-H are shown in italics.
In addition to modular domains, FAK and Pyk2 have key tyrosine residues that regulate their functions. FAK Y397 and Pyk2 Y402 are found in the linker regions between the FERM and kinase domains. These residues are auto-phosphorylation sites, but other mechanisms also induce their phosphorylation as discussed below. The SFKs, including Src, Lck, and Fyn, bind FAK and Pyk2 on these residues and phosphorylate FAK Y576/577 and Pyk2 Y579/Y580, which are found in the kinase domains of these proteins. These phosphorylation events induce maximum catalytic function. FAK Y925 and Pyk2 Y880 are found in the FAT domain, and, upon phosphorylation, these sites bind to Grb2 family adaptor proteins. Interestingly, Grb2 has only been demonstrated to interact with Pyk2 in transformed T cells and not primary T cells [19]. In later sections of this review, we highlight additional proteins that bind to these modular domains and phosphotyrosine residues and discuss their relevance to T cell function. Many additional reviews describe in more detail studies examining FAK and Pyk2’s structure and interacting partners [19, 30, 31, 35, 29].
Phosphorylation mechanisms and kinetics
Fyn and/or Lck associate with FAK and Pyk2 and control FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation downstream of the TCR [7–10, 23, 34, 36–38]. In Fyn−/− T cells, anti-CD3 antibody induced phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2 is reduced [36, 37]. Similarly, after treatment with the SFK inhibitor PP2, the TCR-inducible phosphorylation of Pyk2 Y402 and Y580 is dramatically decreased in the human T cell lines and activated primary human T cells [8–10]. Inhibition of Ca2+ influx, PI3K function, actin cytoskeletal reorganization or ZAP-70 expression does not alter TCR-mediated Pyk2 phosphorylation on Y402 or Y580 [10]. Other studies appear to contradict these findings, demonstrating that Ca2+ flux, actin cytoskeletal reorganization, PI3K activation, and ZAP-70 kinase function control Pyk2 phosphorylation downstream of the TCR [23, 39, 40]. However, off-target effects of the pharmacological inhibitors used in these studies or contaminating stimulation from integrin receptors likely contributed to the different results.
Recent work has further elucidated how Lck/Fyn activity regulates FAK phosphorylation. In activated human CD4+ T cells, FAK is constitutively phosphorylated on Y397, Y576/577, and Y925 [38]. This basal phosphorylation is dramatically reduced upon PP2 treatment, while only Y925 treatment is affected by treatment with PF-562,271, a FAK/Pyk2 dual kinase inhibitor [38]. Moreover, treatment with either PP2 or PF-562,271 reduces the levels of TCR-inducible FAK phosphorylation at all these sites, with the most dramatic effect observed using PP2. Lck and/or Fyn’s constitutive kinase activities [41] may maintain a pre-activated pool of FAK that can subsequently phosphorylate FAK Y397 after TCR stimulation. This event would allow Lck/Fyn to bind to this site and phosphorylate FAK Y576/77 and Y925. It is unknown if FAK is constitutively phosphorylated in naïve T cells.
The TCR-inducible tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2 occurs within 1–5 min post-stimulation and is maintained 60–120 min after activation [9, 10, 18]. Interestingly, Pyk2 has two unique bursts of Y402 and Y580 phosphorylation, and these early (within 1–2 min) and late (within 30–60 min) peaks are independently controlled by Lck and/or Fyn activity [9]. The phosphorylation of these sites appears to induce Pyk2’s catalytic function, as the Pyk2 substrate paxillin is also phosphorylated with similar magnitude and kinetics as Pyk2 [9]. Anti-CD3 antibody-induced FAK phosphorylation also appears to occur in two phases [18], although the phosphorylation kinetics of individual tyrosine residues have not been examined.
The activation of costimulatory and adhesion receptors also influences FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation. CD28 is an important costimulatory molecule that induces T cell activation [1, 2]. Although it is unclear if CD28 ligation alone induces Pyk2 phosphorylation, CD28 activation augments FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation in response to suboptimal TCR stimulation [32, 40, 42]. Adhesion receptors, including VLA-4, LFA-1, and CD44, facilitate T cell-APC or target cell interactions in secondary lymphoid tissues or at sites of inflammation and also serve as costimulatory receptors for T cells [1, 2, 5, 17, 19, 31, 35, 42–44]. The simultaneous activation of the TCR and LFA-1 or VLA-4 enhances the TCR-induced phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2 [11, 12, 18, 42]. Activation of the adhesion and costimulatory molecule CD44 also stimulates the phosphorylation of Pyk2 and FAK. It is unknown whether CD44 and TCR signals cooperate to induce Pyk2 or FAK phosphorylation.
Natural ligands or agonistic antibodies against subunits of LFA-1 and VLA-4 induce FAK and Pyk2 activation independently of TCR stimulation [11, 12, 18, 21, 45–48]. Compared to the TCR, anti-LFA-1 antibody-induced phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2 is delayed, occurring between 10 to 15 minutes after receptor stimulation [48]. Moreover, anti-LFA-1 antibody-induced Pyk2 phosphorylation peaks more rapidly and is more transient than FAK phosphorylation [48]. By contrast, FAK is phosphorylated within 1 minute of fibronectin stimulation; this phosphorylation peaks at 15 min after stimulation and is maintained out to 120 min after fibronectin stimulation [18]. FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation is also observed after recombinant vascular cellular adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 and agonistic monoclonal antibody stimulation [45–47].
It has been proposed that integrin activation drives the localized accumulation of FAK and/or Pyk2, leading to the trans-autophosphorylation of FAK Y397 or Pyk2 Y402. Subsequently, SFKs will bind to the autophosphorylation site and induce maximum enzymatic function of FAK and Pyk2 [19, 35]. It appears that the cytoskeletal network increases the localized concentration of FAK and Pyk2 after LFA-1 stimulation, as FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation requires actin and microtubule cytoskeletal stability [48]. Extracellular Ca2+ flux also serves to activate LFA-1 function, leading to Pyk2 phosphorylation [49]. Pyk2 phosphorylation downstream of LFA-1 is inhibited by the small GTPase and its effector Rho kinase (ROCK), as these proteins limit localized actin cytoskeletal responses that increase LFA-1 avidity [50]. The cytoskeletal network also appears to regulate FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation downstream of VLA-4 in T cells. In this regard, VLA-4 induced FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation are linked to paxillin binding to the α4 subunit of VLA-4 [47], suggesting paxillin directly recruits FAK and Pyk2 to this receptor to promote their activation. Finally, CD44-induced Pyk2 phosphorylation requires SFK and PLC-γ1 activity [20]. Together, these studies demonstrate that the activation of multiple receptors can induce the phosphorylation and activation of Pyk2 and Fak, but that different environmental stimuli promote FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation via distinct mechanisms.
Subcellular localizations of FAK and Pyk2 are regulated by receptor stimulation
Upon TCR-mediated binding to peptide-MHC ligand, the morphology of T cells changes dramatically. First, the T cell membrane forms lamellipodia over the surface of the APC or target cell. Afterward, integrin-induced adhesion causes the T cell to arrest and adopt a polarized configuration (reviewed in [51, 52]). At the T cell-APC interface, an organized structure called the immunological synapse (IS) is formed. The TCR, adhesion, and costimulatory receptors are localized into defined regions within the IS, and intracellular signaling proteins and cytoskeletal networks facilitate the crosstalk between receptors at this site [51, 52]. We recently demonstrated that FAK coimmunoprecipates with the TCR-CD4 complex in activated human CD4+ T cells, and that FAK colocalizes with LFA-1 in T cells [53]. The TCR-FAK interaction may be mediated by FAK binding directly to Lck/Fyn and/or CD4 [7, 54, 53]. TCR stimulation alone drives Pyk2’s re-localization to the IS, while Pyk2 is recruited to this region with faster kinetics and/or more efficiently upon simultaneous TCR and CD28 or LFA-1 stimulation [55, 56]. Upon activation, Pyk2 translocates to the IS, and the recruitment to this sites requires Lck/Fyn, but not Pyk2, catalytic function [57, 55]. Further, translocation of Pyk2 to the IS is also impaired in T cells lacking functional ITAMs on the receptor, Lck, the Tec kinases Itk and Rlk, and to a lesser extent, ZAP-70 [56, 55]. The fact that approximately 50% of Pyk2 still reorients to the IS after anti-CD3 antibody stimulation in ZAP-70-deficient Jurkat T cells suggests that other ITAM-associated proteins associate with Pyk2. At the IS, the scaffolding and/or enzymatic functions of FAK and Pyk2 is likely important to couple multiple receptor-mediated signals to drive efficient T cell responses. We discuss some of these functions later in this review.
The microtubule organizing complex (MTOC) reorients toward the IS upon antigen recognition. In resting CD8+ T cells and activated human T cells [57, 49], Pyk2 colocalizes with the MTOC. Upon receiving TCR stimulation, Pyk2 and the MTOC localize near the T cell-APC interface [58, 57, 55]. Paxillin, which constitutively binds to Pyk2’s FAT domain [59, 19], may allow Pyk2 to associate with the MTOC [57]. FAK could potentially also localize to this site, as LFA-1stimulation drives MTOC, FAK, and Pyk2 reorientation in human T cells [48]. Treatment with the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide (BIM)-II modestly suppressed Pyk2 translocation induced by anti-CD3 antibody stimulation [55]; therefore, the activation of PKCθ, PKCη, and/or PKCε may regulate Pyk2 reorientation similarly to their known roles in controlling MTOC polarization [58]. Because the MTOC-associated fraction of Pyk2 is distinguishable from the IS-associated pool of Pyk2 [57], the presence of these two fractions may explain why Pyk2 has two separate bursts of tyrosine phosphorylation after TCR stimulation [9]. Future studies will investigate the mechanisms that drive Pyk2 into two subcellular localizations. Relative to IS-associated Pyk2, MTOC-bound Pyk2 is hypophosphorylated on serine/threonine residues. As protein kinase A promotes and calcineurin inhibits Pyk2 serine/threonine phosphorylation in neurons [60], these two proteins may regulate the functional localization of Pyk2 in activated T cells.
FAK and Pyk2 in T cell development
T cell development occurs in the thymus, where immature T cells, or thymocytes, respond to various environmental stimuli that promote their differentiation and survival. Developing thymocytes progress sequentially from the CD4−CD8− double negative stages (DN) to the CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) stage to the CD4+CD8− or CD4−CD8+ single positive (SP) stage before exiting the thymus as mature T cells [61]. In the DN and DP stages, pre-TCR and TCR signaling, respectively, regulate survival, proliferation, and differentiation [61, 62]. TCR stimulation in thymocytes promotes FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation [36, 63, 37], suggesting that both proteins may serve important roles in thymocyte development. To investigate this possibility, FAK and Pyk2-deficient mice have been generated. While FAK−/− mice are embryonic lethal [64], whole animal Pyk2−/− mice are viable and have no defects in T cell development [65], suggesting that Pyk2 is not a major regulator of TCR signaling in the thymus. FAK’s role in thymocyte development is unclear. T cell development is normal in FAK+/− mice and CD4+ T cell lineage-specific FAK knockout mice [38, 63]. However, breeding FAK+/− mice with Fyn−/− mice reduces both the phosphorylation and in vitro kinase activity of FAK more efficiently than suppression of Fyn or FAK alone [63]. The FAK+/−Fyn−/− mice have 100-fold fewer thymocytes, but higher percentages of CD4 or CD8 SP and DN thymocytes than the parental strains [63]. Thus, incomplete inhibition of FAK function may explain why no defects are seen when FAK expression is suppressed by only 50–60%. Alternatively, Fyn deficiency may also reduce Pyk2’s function in the FAK+/−Fyn−/− thymocytes [8–10, 37], which would suggest that these kinases have compensatory roles in T cell development.
Functions of FAK and Pyk2 in mature T cells
Overview of TCR signal transduction and function in mature T cells
TCR stimulation by cognate peptide-MHC ligand drives intracellular signaling, which is initiated by Lck and/or Fyn [1, 2, 41]. These Src family kinases phosphorylate immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) found in the intracellular chains of the TCR. Subsequently, ZAP-70 is recruited to the TCR and activated [1, 2]. ZAP-70 phosphorylates the critical adaptor proteins, LAT and SLP-76 [1, 2, 4]. Several adaptor proteins and enzymes are then recruited to LAT and SLP-76. Phospholipase C-γ1, which induces Ca2+ flux and diacylglycerol (DAG) production, is one such protein. In addition, the Grb2 family of adaptors and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) proteins, which activate the MAPKs and Akt signaling pathways, respectively, also localize to the LAT/SLP-76 complex. These pathways influence cytokine production, proliferation, and survival. Many actin cytoskeletal-associated proteins also interact with the LAT/SLP-76 complex to induce T cell spreading, adhesion, and migration [1, 2, 4].
FAK and Pyk2 differentially influence functions downstream of the TCR
No consensus has formed with regard to Pyk2’s function in effector T cell responses. Overexpression studies in Jurkat cells suggested that TCR and CD28-induced c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPK activation and IL-2 production are partially dependent upon Pyk2 [32]. Using T cells from Pyk2 knockout mice, Weiss and colleagues demonstrated that both Pyk2-deficient CD4+ and CD8+ T cells have reduced proliferation in vitro following high dose anti-CD3 antibody stimulation, and that IL-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ production by Pyk2−/− CD8+ T cells are impaired under the same conditions [66]. In the CD8+ T cells, these defects are more pronounced after stimulation with low dose anti-CD3 antibody in combination with the LFA-1 ligand, intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 [66]. Lymphocytic-chriomeningitis virus (LCMV) antigen-specific proliferative responses are also impaired in vitro [66]. While these studies suggest that Pyk2 serves a vital role in generating effector T cell responses, only antigen-specific proliferation and short-lived effector CD8+ T cell generation are impaired in the absence of Pyk2 following an in vivo LCMV challenge, while IL-2 and IFN-γ production are not altered [66]. Although CD25 expression is comparable between the Pyk2 sufficient and deficient CD8+ T cells [66], these proliferation defects may be in part linked to defective IL-2 signaling, as overexpression of kinase-dead Pyk2 suppresses IL-2 induced proliferation [15]. It is unknown why Pyk2 deficiency has a more profound effect on CD8+ T cell effector function in vitro than in vivo, but it is possible that increased FAK expression in vivo and/or FAK compensating for the loss of Pyk2 account for these differences. Indeed, FAK expression increases upon T cell activation [53, 67], and Pyk2 partially compensates for FAK in other systems [68, 69].
The role that Pyk2 serves in CD4+ T cell responses is even less clear. As noted above, anti-CD3 antibody-induced proliferation of naïve CD4+ T cells is partially dependent upon Pyk2 [66]. However, other effector functions like cytokine production were not examined. Interestingly, when Pyk2’s expression or catalytic function is suppressed in activated CD4+ T cells, anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibody-induced IL-2 production is not inhibited [70]. Thus, Pyk2 may serve different functions in naïve versus effector/memory CD4+ T cells. In support of this role, recent work has demonstrated that Pyk2 is hyper-activated in PTP-PEST−/− CD4+ T cells, and that these cells have impaired secondary but not primary responses to antigen stimulation [70]. PTP-PEST−/− CD4+ T cells are also more susceptible to becoming anergic [70], a state that occurs after T cells receive TCR signals in the absence of adequate costimulation [71], and Pyk2 inhibition reverses the anergic phenotype of the PTP-PEST−/− CD4+ T cells [70]. These data indicate that Pyk2 may regulate distinct functions in T cells depending upon which receptors are activated, the activation status of the cells, or the specific T cell lineage examined.
Like Pyk2, FAK’s role in T cell biology is controversial. When activated human CD4+ T cells were treated with PF-562,271, the TCR-inducible phosphorylation of ZAP-70, LAT, and Erk1/Erk2 is reduced. Moreover, anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibody-induced proliferation was impaired when either human or murine CD4+ T cells were treated with this inhibitor [38]. Although these data suggest that FAK positively regulates TCR signaling and proliferative responses, no proliferation defects are observed when FAK is conditionally deleted in murine CD4+ T cells [38]. The differences in these experiments could be explained by the simultaneous inhibition of other kinases, including Pyk2, in the inhibitor experiments or by the incomplete deletion of FAK in the murine CD4+ T cells. To clarify the functional role that FAK serves in TCR activation, we selectively suppressed FAK’s expression in both Jurkat T cells and activated human CD4+ T cells [53]. Although we observe slight decreases in ZAP-70 and Erk1/Erk2 phosphorylation in FAK-deficient T cells, the TCR-inducible phosphorylation of LAT, SLP-76, PLC-γ1, and Akt is elevated in these cells compared to controls. The FAK-deficient T cells also have enhanced TCR antigen sensitivity, as they produce more IL-2 and IFN-γ and have increased CD69 surface expression after stimulation with suboptimal doses of anti-CD3 antibody [53]. Thus, our data demonstrate that FAK negatively regulates TCR function in activated human CD4+ T cells. Ongoing work in our laboratory is determining how FAK integrates TCR and co-stimulatory signals to influence T cell activation and differentiation.
Csk is a cytosolic tyrosine kinase that associates with membrane-bound adaptor proteins via its SH2 domain, which facilitates its ability to suppress SFK function [72, 73]. This inhibition is important to suppress both tonic and TCR-inducible signaling [74, 75]. FAK binds to Csk in other cell lineages [72, 76], and FAK and Csk-deficient T cells have similar signaling and functional defects after TCR stimulation. We found that, after TCR stimulation, less Csk associates with the plasma membrane, the TCR, and Lck in FAK-deficient T cells [53]. FAK-deficient T cells also have decreased Lck Y505 phosphorylation, the site that is directly phosphorylated by Csk to suppress Lck function, while the magnitude and kinetics of phosphorylation of the Lck substrates, Lck Y394 and TCRζ-ITAM Y142, are higher and faster, respectively [53]. These data collectively suggest that FAK regulates Csk’s functional localization to negatively regulate Lck activation after TCR stimulation. Although the precise mechanisms remain elusive, FAK Y397 is contained within the consensus binding motif for the SH2 domain of Csk [77], and Pyk2 Y402 binds the Csk-related protein, Csk homologous kinase (Chk) [78].
Control of actin cytoskeletal responses downstream of the TCR
The actin cytoskeleton serves multifaceted roles in regulating T cell responses by controlling intracellular signaling, driving cellular adhesion, and promoting cellular migration [52, 51]. Previous studies in non-T cells suggest redundant roles for FAK and Pyk2 as actin cytoskeletal remodeling-inducing proteins (reviewed in [19, 35]). Indeed, we found that two phases of Pyk2 phosphorylation and actin polymerization are observed after TCR stimulation [9], and that these two bursts of actin polymerization appear to promote two phases of adhesion to anti-CD3 antibody-coated plastic plates [8]. We demonstrated that Pyk2’s catalytic function is partially required for the first wave of TCR-driven adhesion, while its scaffolding function regulated the second phase [8]. In further support of Pyk2’s role as an actin cytoskeleton regulatory protein, anti-CD3 antibody-induced spreading is reduced in Pyk2-deficient Jurkat T cells after 7.5 minutes of stimulation (Figure 2); this defect is strikingly similar to Jurkat T cells that are treated with actin depolymerizing agents [79]. Although these data suggest that Pyk2 regulates TCR-induced adhesion via two distinct mechanisms, whether the two separate pools of Pyk2 described by St-Pierre et al. [57] differentially regulate these functions remains uninvestigated. To control actin cytoskeletal responses, Pyk2 may promote the activation of actin cytoskeletal remodeling proteins that associate with the LAT and/or SLP-76. For instance, Pyk2 may regulate small Rho GTPase activation to control actin cytoskeletal-induced spreading and adhesion. In support of this view, Pyk2 interacts with many modulators of Rho family GTPase function, including Vav1 [32, 33], and is linked to Rac, Rho, and Cdc42 function [33, 65, 70, 80]. As discussed below, Pyk2’s scaffolding function may stabilize TCR-induced adhesion by facilitating crosstalk between the TCR and the actin cytoskeleton network to induce contractile forces.
Figure 2.
Anti-CD3 antibody-induced actin polymerization and spreading are impaired in Pyk2-deficient Jurkat T cells. Jurkat T cells were transfected with the control, luciferase (Luc)-specific microRNA (miRNA) or the Pyk2-specific miRNA. These cells were then stimulated on glass chamber slides using 10 µg/ml of anti-CD3 antibody for 7.5 minutes. The fixed cells were then stained for F-actin using FITC-phalloidin. One representative image is shown, and the cell area of 25 cells was calculated using Fiji software. The graph shows the mean ± s.d. from 25 cells.
Coating anti-CD3 antibody onto rigid surfaces drives T cell spreading early after activation, but later leads to the generation of stable cell-stimulatory interface contacts that are facilitated by TCR-induced contractile forces at the periphery of the cell [8, 79, 81–83]. The TCR is a mechanosensor for substrate rigidity, and this process regulates efficient intracellular signaling, IL-2 production, and proliferation [81, 82]. Anti-CD3 and/or anti-CD28-induced traction forces are generated in the cell periphery [81, 83], where F-actin is co-localized with TCR microclusters [5, 51]. Moreover, phosphorylated SFKs and Pyk2 are also localized to the periphery of the cell, where the largest forces are generated upon anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibody stimulation, whereas phosphorylated ZAP-70 is distributed throughout the cell [81, 82]. SFK inhibition using PP2 leads to a correlative decrease in both Pyk2 phosphorylation and traction forces induced by anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies [81], suggesting that Pyk2 is a critical mechanosensor downstream of the TCR. This potential function of Pyk2 may explain, in part, why Pyk2-deficient T cells do not stably adhere or proliferate after TCR stimulation [8, 66].
In contrast to Pyk2, FAK does not appear to control actin cytoskeletal responses downstream of the TCR. We demonstrated that anti-CD3 antibody-induced spreading, adhesion, and TCR downregulation are normal in FAK-deficient Jurkat T cells [8, 53]. However, FAK could regulate TCR and chemokine receptor-induced “inside-out” signaling that promotes integrin clustering and affinity maturation, which increases adhesion receptor function. Although these data suggest that Pyk2 is the primary regulator of TCR-dependent actin cytoskeletal responses, FAK and Pyk2 are also phosphorylated downstream of many chemokine receptors and facilitate adhesion and migration in B cells, neutrophils, and macrophages [19, 65, 84]. Therefore, their roles in chemokine-induced T cell responses need to be investigated.
FAK and Pyk2 regulate adhesion receptor function
Although FAK and Pyk2 are activated downstream of the adhesion receptors, VLA-4 and CD44 [6, 14, 18, 20, 45, 46, 21], few studies have examined functions that FAK or Pyk2 serve downstream of these receptors. Overexpressing dominant-negative truncation mutants of FAK or Pyk2 into Jurkat T cells inhibits VLA-4-induced trans-regulation of LFA-1, resulting in reduced migration on ICAM-1 coated surfaces [47]. FAK is also implicated in regulating VLA-4 induced costimulation, as expressing a truncation mutant of Crk-associated substrate lymphocyte-type (Cas-L) that cannot be phosphorylated by FAK inhibits TCR and VLA-4-induced IL-2 production in Jurkat T cells, whereas cells that overexpress full-length Cas-L retain VLA-4 costimulatory function [85]. Further, FAK scaffolding function regulates matrix metalloproteases downstream of VLA-4 [86]. Anti-CD44 antibody treatment promotes actin cytoskeletal rearrangement which induces T cell spreading and elongation, and the catalytic function of Pyk2 controls these processes [20]. Whether Pyk2 controls CD44-induced costimulation or adhesion has not been investigated, and FAK’s role downstream of CD44 is unexplored.
Catalytic inhibition of FAK alone or in combination with Pyk2 inhibition reduces T cell-APC conjugate formation [38], suggesting that these kinases may serve functionally redundant roles in controlling T cell adhesion events regulated by integrins. T cell-APC interactions are stabilized after TCR stimulation promotes LFA-1 integrin activation. Weiss and colleagues demonstrated that adhesion to ICAM-1 in the presence or absence of TCR stimulation is dramatically reduced in the Pyk2−/− CD8+ T cells. These data, combined with those linking Pyk2 to TCR-induced actin remodeling ([8]; Figure 2), suggest that Pyk2 regulates both TCR-induced “inside-out” and LFA-1-mediated “outside-in” signals to promote adhesion to ICAM-1. A reduction in FAK phosphorylation is also correlated with impaired TCR-induced LFA-1 clustering and adhesion to ICAM-1 in Jurkat T cells [87], and a modest reduction in adhesion to ICAM-1 was reported in FAK-deficient CD4+ T cells [38]. Thus, FAK and Pyk2 may serve redundant functions downstream of LFA-1 to induce T cell adhesion to APC. FAK and Pyk2 may also regulate CD2-mediated or chemokine-induced adhesion, as these receptors induce FAK and Pyk2 activation [19].
T cells also form self-aggregates that promote cytokine exchange and augment T cell activation. Like T cell-APC interactions, T cell-T cell aggregate formation is also regulated by LFA-1/ICAM-1 interactions [88]. Interestingly, FAK and Pyk2 seem to play opposing roles in LFA-1-induced T cell homo-aggregate formation. Hyperphosphorylation of Pyk2 in PTP-PEST−/− CD4+ T cells is correlated with reduced T cell-T cell aggregate formation [70], and this finding likely explains why these cells have reduced secondary T cell responses [70]. By contrast, Jurkat T cells that overexpress the low molecular weight-protein tyrosine phosphatase (LMW-PTP) have reduced FAK phosphorylation and T cell homoaggregate formation [87], likely as a result of impaired LFA-1 clustering. Future work will utilize FAK and Pyk2-deficient systems to better determine the roles these proteins serve in LFA-1-mediated homoaggregate formation.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Recent studies have challenged the view that FAK and Pyk2 serve functionally redundant roles to regulate receptor-mediated actin cytoskeletal responses in T cells. Instead, FAK and Pyk2 have receptor-specific functions, which are likely regulated by a receptor’s unique spatiotemporal and mechanistic regulation of FAK and Pyk2 activation and by distinct protein-protein interactions that occur downstream of these receptors. Pyk2 controls actin cytoskeletal responses, including spreading and adhesion, downstream of the TCR and CD44 and both positively and negatively regulates LFA-1-induced functions. By contrast, FAK is not required for actin cytoskeletal rearrangements downstream of the TCR but is instead a novel inhibitor of TCR function. Further, FAK positively regulates LFA-1-induced responses in T cells (Figure 3). Thus, these related kinases serve important and distinct functions downstream of the TCR, but have some level of functional redundancy downstream of LFA-1. Future work will characterize if these and other unique functions extend to CD44 and VLA-4 and will examine the signaling events that FAK and Pyk2 induce to control these redundant and unique functions.
Figure 3.
Summary of FAK and Pyk2 functions downstream of the TCR, CD28, and LFA-1. In resting T cells, FAK and Pyk2 are localized near the microtubule organizing complex (MTOC; not shown). Upon TCR activation, FAK and Pyk2 are phosphorylated by Lck/Fyn, while additional receptor-induced signals from CD28 and LFA-1 synergize to enhance FAK and Pyk2 phosphorylation. The subcellular localization of FAK and Pyk2 changes after these receptors are activated. FAK is recruited to the TCR complex, where it associates with Csk to inhibit TCR-dependent signaling and function. LFA-1 stimulation also drives FAK-MTOC relocalization, and FAK positively regulates LFA-1-induced T cell adhesion to APC and other T cells. After antigen recognition, a fraction of Pyk2 remains associated with the MTOC, while a different pool of Pyk2 is recruited to the T cell-APC interface. The latter pool of Pyk2 may associate with the LAT/SLP-76 complex to couple TCR and CD28 signaling that drives MAPK and/or PI3K activation. Additionally, this pool of Pyk2 may regulate actin cytoskeletal polymerization to activate LFA-1 and promote T cell spreading. In this manner, Pyk2 positively regulates LFA-1 induced adhesion to APC and LFA-1 mediated costimulation that induces T cell proliferation and cytokine production. We propose that the MTOC-associated pool of Pyk2 regulates signaling that drives MTOC reorganization to control directional cytokine and lytic granule secretion and asymmetric cell division that promotes effector T cell formation.
What role does each pool of Pyk2 serve in T cell responses? MTOC polarization regulates directional lytic granule and cytokine secretion and is also implicated in asymmetric cell division [58], which is involved in effector versus memory T cell generation [89]. Given that Pyk2 regulates MTOC polarization in NK cells [90, 91], it is reasonable to hypothesize that Pyk2 controls this process in T cells. This prediction may help explain why effector T cell generation and anti-CD3 antibody induced spreading are impaired in Pyk2-deficient CD8+ T cells and Jurkat T cells, respectively (Figure 2; [66, 79]). The IS-associated fraction of Pyk2 may associate with TCR signaling molecules, including Lck/Fyn, ZAP-70, Grb2, and/or PI3K [7, 32, 34, 37, 92, 93]. Therefore, Pyk2 may promote proliferation and cytokine responses in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by controlling proximal TCR signaling events leading to LAT/SLP-76 complex formation, MAPK activation, or PI3K function. Future work will also ascertain how Pyk2 promotes T cell anergy. In this regard, Pyk2’s scaffolding or enzymatic may regulate the function of the Cbl family of E3 ubiquitin ligases [94], which promote T cell anergy [95].
Although FAK negatively regulates TCR function in human CD4+ T cells [53], the precise molecular mechanisms that govern its control of Csk are unknown. Moreover, it is unclear how costimulatory signals impact this function of FAK. Does FAK deficiency allow T cells to robustly respond to low dose or affinity antigens in the absence of costimulation? If so, could this feature be manipulated therapeutically to increase T cell responses to weak antigens? Conversely, does loss of FAK function contribute to T cell hyperactivation in autoimmunity or facilitate T cell leukemia and lymphoma development? The roles FAK and Pyk2 serve in CD4+ T cell differentiation and memory T cell formation is also an interesting topic for future study, given that FAK and Pyk2 are clinical targets of interest [31]. Ultimately, further investigation into the roles FAK and Pyk2 serve in normal and dysfunctional T cell responses is needed before clinicians can safely harness FAK and Pyk2 inhibitors to treat human diseases without deleterious T cell-mediated effects.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Pre-doctoral Fellowship (11PRE7390070 to N.M.C.) and a Scientist’s Development Grant (0830244N to J.C.D.H) from the American Heart Association. Additional support from the National Institutes of Health (T32 AI008595 to N.M.C. and ROI CA136729 from J.C.D.H.) also funded this work.
References
- 1.Brownlie RJ, Zamoyska R. T cell receptor signalling networks: branched, diversified and bounded. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(4):257–269. doi: 10.1038/nri3403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith-Garvin JE, Koretzky GA, Jordan MS. T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:591–619. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sato T, Tachibana K, Nojima Y, D'Avirro N, Morimoto C. Role of the VLA-4 molecule in T cell costimulation. Identification of the tyrosine phosphorylation pattern induced by the ligation of VLA-4. J Immunol. 1995;155(6):2938–2947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bartelt RR, Houtman JC. The adaptor protein LAT serves as an integration node for signaling pathways that drive T cell activation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2013;5(1):101–110. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baaten BJ, Li CR, Bradley LM. Multifaceted regulation of T cells by CD44. Communicative & integrative biology. 2010;3(6):508–512. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.6.13495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Udagawa T, Woodside DG, McIntyre BW. Alpha 4 beta 1 (CD49d/CD29) integrin costimulation of human T cells enhances transcription factor and cytokine induction in the absence of altered sensitivity to anti-CD3 stimulation. J Immunol. 1996;157(5):1965–1972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berg NN, Ostergaard HL. T cell receptor engagement induces tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2 and their association with Lck. J Immunol. 1997;159(4):1753–1757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chapman NM, Yoder AN, Houtman JC. Non-catalytic functions of Pyk2 and Fyn regulate late stage adhesion in human T cells. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Collins M, Bartelt RR, Houtman JC. T cell receptor activation leads to two distinct phases of Pyk2 activation and actin cytoskeletal rearrangement in human T cells. Molecular immunology. 2010;47(9):1665–1674. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Collins M, Tremblay M, Chapman N, Curtiss M, Rothman PB, Houtman JC. The T cell receptor-mediated phosphorylation of Pyk2 tyrosines 402 and 580 occurs via a distinct mechanism than other receptor systems. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87(4):691–701. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0409227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tabassam FH, Umehara H, Huang JY, Gouda S, Kono T, Okazaki T, et al. Beta2-integrin, LFA-1, and TCR/CD3 synergistically induce tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (pp125(FAK)) in PHA-activated T cells. Cell Immunol. 1999;193(2):179–184. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1999.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ostergaard HL, Ma EA. Fibronectin induces phosphorylation of a 120-kDa protein and synergizes with the T cell receptor to activate cytotoxic T cell clones. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25(1):252–256. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dikic I, Dikic I, Schlessinger J. Identification of a new Pyk2 isoform implicated in chemokine and antigen receptor signaling. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(23):14301–14308. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.23.14301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li R, Wong N, Jabali MD, Johnson P. CD44-initiated cell spreading induces Pyk2 phosphorylation, is mediated by Src family kinases, and is negatively regulated by CD45. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(31):28767–28773. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100158200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miyazaki T, Takaoka A, Nogueira L, Dikic I, Fujii H, Tsujino S, et al. Pyk2 is a downstream mediator of the IL-2 receptor-coupled Jak signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 1998;12(6):770–775. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.6.770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ma EA, Lou O, Berg NN, Ostergaard HL. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes express a beta3 integrin which can induce the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and the related PYK-2. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27(1):329–335. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Doucey MA, Legler DF, Faroudi M, Boucheron N, Baumgaertner P, Naeher D, et al. The beta1 and beta3 integrins promote T cell receptor-mediated cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(29):26983–26991. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302709200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maguire JE, Danahey KM, Burkly LC, van Seventer GA. T cell receptor- and beta 1 integrin-mediated signals synergize to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (pp125FAK) in human T cells. J Exp Med. 1995;182(6):2079–2090. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.6.2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ostergaard HL, Lysechko TL. Focal adhesion kinase-related protein tyrosine kinase Pyk2 in T-cell activation and function. Immunol Res. 2005;31(3):267–282. doi: 10.1385/IR:31:3:267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wong NK, Lai JC, Maeshima N, Johnson P. CD44-mediated elongated T cell spreading requires Pyk2 activation by Src family kinases, extracellular calcium, phospholipase C and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. Cell Signal. 2011;23(5):812–819. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.01.003. doi:S0898-6568(11)00004-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.01.003 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krawczyk C, Oliveira-dos-Santos A, Sasaki T, Griffiths E, Ohashi PS, Snapper S, et al. Vav1 controls integrin clustering and MHC/peptide-specific cell adhesion to antigen-presenting cells. Immunity. 2002;16(3):331–343. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00291-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sasaki H, Nagura K, Ishino M, Tobioka H, Kotani K, Sasaki T. Cloning and characterization of cell adhesion kinase beta, a novel protein-tyrosine kinase of the focal adhesion kinase subfamily. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(36):21206–21219. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.36.21206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ganju RK, Hatch WC, Avraham H, Ona MA, Druker B, Avraham S, et al. RAFTK, a novel member of the focal adhesion kinase family, is phosphorylated and associates with signaling molecules upon activation of mature T lymphocytes. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1997;185(6):1055–1063. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.6.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu H, Li X, Marchetto GS, Dy R, Hunter D, Calvo B, et al. Activation of a novel calcium-dependent protein-tyrosine kinase. Correlation with c-Jun N-terminal kinase but not mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(47):29993–29998. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.47.29993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Herzog H, Nicholl J, Hort YJ, Sutherland GR, Shine J. Molecular cloning and assignment of FAK2, a novel human focal adhesion kinase, to 8p11.2-p22 by nonisotopic in situ hybridization. Genomics. 1996;32(3):484–486. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Avraham S, Avraham H. Characterization of the novel focal adhesion kinase RAFTK in hematopoietic cells. Leuk Lymphoma. 1997;27(3–4):247–256. doi: 10.3109/10428199709059681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xiong WC, Macklem M, Parsons JT. Expression and characterization of splice variants of PYK2, a focal adhesion kinase-related protein. Journal of cell science. 1998;111(Pt 14):1981–1991. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.14.1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li X, Hunter D, Morris J, Haskill JS, Earp HS. A calcium-dependent tyrosine kinase splice variant in human monocytes. Activation by a two-stage process involving adherence and a subsequent intracellular signal. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(16):9361–9364. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hall JE, Fu W, Schaller MD. Focal adhesion kinase: exploring Fak structure to gain insight into function. International review of cell and molecular biology. 2011;288:185–225. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386041-5.00005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Frame MC, Patel H, Serrels B, Lietha D, Eck MJ. The FERM domain: organizing the structure and function of FAK. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2010;11(11):802–814. doi: 10.1038/nrm2996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cance WG, Kurenova E, Marlowe T, Golubovskaya V. Disrupting the scaffold to improve focal adhesion kinase-targeted cancer therapeutics. Sci Signal. 2013;6(268):pe10. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Katagiri T, Takahashi T, Sasaki T, Nakamura S, Hattori S. Protein-tyrosine kinase Pyk2 is involved in interleukin-2 production by Jurkat T cells via its tyrosine 402. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275(26):19645–19652. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909828199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gismondi A, Jacobelli J, Strippoli R, Mainiero F, Soriani A, Cifaldi L, et al. Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 and Rac activation by chemokine and integrin receptors controls NK cell transendothelial migration. J Immunol. 2003;170(6):3065–3073. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Franklin RA, Atherfold PA, Robinson PJ, Bonner D. Regulation of Pyk2 expression by p56(Lck) in Jurkat T lymphocytes. Cellular signalling. 2001;13(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/s0898-6568(00)00142-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schaller MD. Cellular functions of FAK kinases: insight into molecular mechanisms and novel functions. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 7):1007–1013. doi: 10.1242/jcs.045112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fukai I, Hussey RE, Sunder-Plassmann R, Reinherz EL. A critical role for p59(fyn) in CD2-based signal transduction. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30(12):3507–3515. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(2000012)30:12<3507::AID-IMMU3507>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qian D, Lev S, van Oers NS, Dikic I, Schlessinger J, Weiss A. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk2 is selectively regulated by Fyn during TCR signaling. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1997;185(7):1253–1259. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.7.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wiemer AJ, Wernimont SA, Cung TD, Bennin DA, Beggs HE, Huttenlocher A. The focal adhesion kinase inhibitor PF-562,271 impairs primary CD4+ T cell activation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lysechko TL, Cheung SM, Ostergaard HL. Regulation of the tyrosine kinase Pyk2 by calcium is through production of reactive oxygen species in cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(41):31174–31184. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.118265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tsuchida M, Knechtle SJ, Hamawy MM. CD28 ligation induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk2 but not Fak in Jurkat T cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(10):6735–6740. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.10.6735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nika K, Soldani C, Salek M, Paster W, Gray A, Etzensperger R, et al. Constitutively active Lck kinase in T cells drives antigen receptor signal transduction. Immunity. 2010;32(6):766–777. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.011. doi:S1074-7613(10)00203-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.011 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.van Seventer GA, Mullen MM, van Seventer JM. Pyk2 is differentially regulated by beta1 integrinand CD28-mediated co-stimulation in human CD4+ T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28(11):3867–3877. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199811)28:11<3867::AID-IMMU3867>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Damle NK, Aruffo A. Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 induces T-cell antigen receptor-dependent activation of CD4+T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(15):6403–6407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Springer TA, Dustin ML. Integrin inside-out signaling and the immunological synapse. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24(1):107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nojima Y, Tachibana K, Sato T, Schlossman SF, Morimoto C. Focal adhesion kinase (pp125FAK) is tyrosine phosphorylated after engagement of alpha 4 beta 1 and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins on human T-lymphoblastic cells. Cell Immunol. 1995;161(1):8–13. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1995.1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Iwata S, Ohashi Y, Kamiguchi K, Morimoto C. Beta 1-integrin-mediated cell signaling in T lymphocytes. Journal of dermatological science. 2000;23(2):75–86. doi: 10.1016/s0923-1811(99)00096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rose DM, Liu S, Woodside DG, Han J, Schlaepfer DD, Ginsberg MH. Paxillin binding to the alpha 4 integrin subunit stimulates LFA-1 (integrin alpha L beta 2)-dependent T cell migration by augmenting the activation of focal adhesion kinase/proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2. J Immunol. 2003;170(12):5912–5918. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.12.5912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rodriguez-Fernandez JL, Gomez M, Luque A, Hogg N, Sanchez-Madrid F, Cabanas C. The interaction of activated integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 with ligand intercellular adhesion molecule 1 induces activation and redistribution of focal adhesion kinase and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 in T lymphocytes. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10(6):1891–1907. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.6.1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rodriguez-Fernandez JL, Sanchez-Martin L, de Frutos CA, Sancho D, Robinson M, Sanchez-Madrid F, et al. LFA-1 integrin and the microtubular cytoskeleton are involved in the Ca(2)(+)-mediated regulation of the activity of the tyrosine kinase PYK2 in T cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;71(3):520–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rodriguez-Fernandez JL, Sanchez-Martin L, Rey M, Vicente-Manzanares M, Narumiya S, Teixido J, et al. Rho and Rho-associated kinase modulate the tyrosine kinase PYK2 in T-cells through regulation of the activity of the integrin LFA-1. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(44):40518–40527. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102896200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dustin ML, Depoil D. New insights into the T cell synapse from single molecule techniques. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(10):672–684. doi: 10.1038/nri3066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Beemiller P, Krummel MF. Mediation of T-cell activation by actin meshworks. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(9):a002444. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chapman NM, Connolly SF, Reinl EL, Houtman JC. Focal adhesion kinase negatively regulates lck function downstream of the T cell antigen receptor. J Immunol. 2013;191(12):6208–6221. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301587. doi:jimmunol.1301587 [pii] 10.4049/jimmunol.1301587 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Garron ML, Arthos J, Guichou JF, McNally J, Cicala C, Arold ST. Structural basis for the interaction between focal adhesion kinase and CD4. J Mol Biol. 2008;375(5):1320–1328. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sancho D, Montoya MC, Monjas A, Gordon-Alonso M, Katagiri T, Gil D, et al. TCR engagement induces proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2 (Pyk2) translocation to the T cell-APC interface independently of Pyk2 activity and in an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-mediated fashion. Journal of immunology. 2002;169(1):292–300. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Finkelstein LD, Shimizu Y, Schwartzberg PL. Tec kinases regulate TCR-mediated recruitment of signaling molecules and integrin-dependent cell adhesion. J Immunol. 2005;175(9):5923–5930. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.St-Pierre J, Lysechko TL, Ostergaard HL. Hypophosphorylated and inactive Pyk2 associates with paxillin at the microtubule organizing center in hematopoietic cells. Cell Signal. 2011;23(4):718–730. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Huse M. Microtubule-organizing center polarity and the immunological synapse: protein kinase C and beyond. Frontiers in immunology. 2012;3:235. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ostergaard HL, Lou O, Arendt CW, Berg NN. Paxillin phosphorylation and association with Lck and Pyk2 in anti-CD3-or anti-CD45-stimulated T cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(10):5692–5696. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Faure C, Ramos M, Girault JA. Pyk2 cytonuclear localization: mechanisms and regulation by serine dephosphorylation. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS. 2013;70(1):137–152. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1075-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Naito T, Tanaka H, Naoe Y, Taniuchi I. Transcriptional control of T-cell development. Int Immunol. 2011;23(11):661–668. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxr078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wiegers GJ, Kaufmann M, Tischner D, Villunger A. Shaping the T-cell repertoire: a matter of life and death. Immunology and cell biology. 2011;89(1):33–39. doi: 10.1038/icb.2010.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kanazawa S, Ilic D, Hashiyama M, Noumura T, Yamamoto T, Suda T, et al. p59fyn-p125FAK cooperation in development of CD4+CD8+ thymocytes. Blood. 1996;87(3):865–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ilic D, Furuta Y, Kanazawa S, Takeda N, Sobue K, Nakatsuji N, et al. Reduced cell motility and enhanced focal adhesion contact formation in cells from FAK-deficient mice. Nature. 1995;377(6549):539–544. doi: 10.1038/377539a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Okigaki M, Davis C, Falasca M, Harroch S, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP, et al. Pyk2 regulates multiple signaling events crucial for macrophage morphology and migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(19):10740–10745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834348100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Beinke S, Phee H, Clingan JM, Schlessinger J, Matloubian M, Weiss A. Proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2 is critical for CD8 T-cell short-lived effector fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(37):16234–16239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011556107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tsuchida M, Manthei ER, Alam T, Knechtle SJ, Hamawy MM. T cell activation up-regulates the expression of the focal adhesion kinase Pyk2: opposing roles for the activation of protein kinase C and the increase in intracellular Ca2+ J Immunol. 1999;163(12):6640–6650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sieg DJ, Ilic D, Jones KC, Damsky CH, Hunter T, Schlaepfer DD. Pyk2 and Src-family proteintyrosine kinases compensate for the loss of FAK in fibronectin-stimulated signaling events but Pyk2 does not fully function to enhance FAK- cell migration. Embo J. 1998;17(20):5933–5947. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.20.5933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Weis SM, Lim ST, Lutu-Fuga KM, Barnes LA, Chen XL, Gothert JR, et al. Compensatory role for Pyk2 during angiogenesis in adult mice lacking endothelial cell FAK. J Cell Biol. 2008;181(1):43–50. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Davidson D, Shi X, Zhong MC, Rhee I, Veillette A. The phosphatase PTP-PEST promotes secondary T cell responses by dephosphorylating the protein tyrosine kinase Pyk2. Immunity. 2010;33(2):167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Valdor R, Macian F. Induction and stability of the anergic phenotype in T cells. Semin Immunol. 2013;25(4):313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sabe H, Hata A, Okada M, Nakagawa H, Hanafusa H. Analysis of the binding of the Src homology 2 domain of Csk to tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in the suppression and mitotic activation of c-Src. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(9):3984–3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Cloutier JF, Chow LM, Veillette A. Requirement of the SH3 and SH2 domains for the inhibitory function of tyrosine protein kinase p50csk in T lymphocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(11):5937–5944. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.5937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Vang T, Abrahamsen H, Myklebust S, Enserink J, Prydz H, Mustelin T, et al. Knockdown of C-terminal Src kinase by siRNA-mediated RNA interference augments T cell receptor signaling in mature T cells. European journal of immunology. 2004;34(8):2191–2199. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schoenborn JR, Tan YX, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Weiss A. Feedback circuits monitor and adjust basal Lck-dependent events in T cell receptor signaling. Science signaling. 2011;4(190):ra59. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bergman M, Joukov V, Virtanen I, Alitalo K. Overexpressed Csk tyrosine kinase is localized in focal adhesions, causes reorganization of alpha v beta 5 integrin, and interferes with HeLa cell spreading. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(2):711–722. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Songyang Z, Shoelson SE, McGlade J, Olivier P, Pawson T, Bustelo XR, et al. Specific motifs recognized by the SH2 domains of Csk, 3BP2, fps/fes, GRB-2, HCP, SHC, Syk, and Vav. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(4):2777–2785. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.4.2777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.McShan GD, Zagozdzon R, Park SY, Zrihan-Licht S, Fu Y, Avraham S, et al. Csk homologous kinase associates with RAFTK/Pyk2 in breast cancer cells and negatively regulates its activation and breast cancer cell migration. International journal of oncology. 2002;21(1):197–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bunnell SC, Kapoor V, Trible RP, Zhang W, Samelson LE. Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. Immunity. 2001;14(3):315–329. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00112-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ren XR, Du QS, Huang YZ, Ao SZ, Mei L, Xiong WC. Regulation of CDC42 GTPase by proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 interacting with PSGAP, a novel pleckstrin homology and Src homology 3 domain containing rhoGAP protein. J Cell Biol. 2001;152(5):971–984. doi: 10.1083/jcb.152.5.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bashour KT, Gondarenko A, Chen H, Shen K, Liu X, Huse M, et al. CD28 and CD3 have complementary roles in T-cell traction forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(6):2241–2246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315606111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Judokusumo E, Tabdanov E, Kumari S, Dustin ML, Kam LC. Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. Biophys J. 2012;102(2):L5–L7. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Babich A, Li S, O'Connor RS, Milone MC, Freedman BD, Burkhardt JK. F-actin polymerization and retrograde flow drive sustained PLCgamma1 signaling during T cell activation. J Cell Biol. 2012;197(6):775–787. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201201018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tse KW, Lin KB, Dang-Lawson M, Guzman-Perez A, Aspnes GE, Buckbinder L, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of the Pyk2 and FAK kinases modulate chemoattractant-induced migration, adhesion and Akt activation in follicular and marginal zone B cells. Cell Immunol. 2012;275(1–2):47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Morimoto C, Kobayashi H, Nishijima R, Tanaka H, Iwata S. Role of the beta1 integrin molecule in T-cell activation and migration. Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association. 2000;10(1):8–15. doi: 10.3109/s101650070032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Segarra M, Vilardell C, Matsumoto K, Esparza J, Lozano E, Serra-Pages C, et al. Dual function of focal adhesion kinase in regulating integrin-induced MMP-2 and MMP-9 release by human T lymphoid cells. FASEB J. 2005;19(13):1875–1877. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3574fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Giannoni E, Chiarugi P, Cozzi G, Magnelli L, Taddei ML, Fiaschi T, et al. Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1-mediated T cell adhesion is impaired by low molecular weight phosphotyrosine phosphatase-dependent inhibition of FAK activity. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(38):36763–36776. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302686200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sabatos CA, Doh J, Chakravarti S, Friedman RS, Pandurangi PG, Tooley AJ, et al. A synaptic basis for paracrine interleukin-2 signaling during homotypic T cell interaction. Immunity. 2008;29(2):238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chang JT, Palanivel VR, Kinjyo I, Schambach F, Intlekofer AM, Banerjee A, et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science. 2007;315(5819):1687–1691. doi: 10.1126/science.1139393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gismondi A, Jacobelli J, Mainiero F, Paolini R, Piccoli M, Frati L, et al. Cutting edge: functional role for proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 in NK cell-mediated natural cytotoxicity. J Immunol. 2000;164(5):2272–2276. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.5.2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sancho D, Nieto M, Llano M, Rodriguez-Fernandez JL, Tejedor R, Avraham S, et al. The tyrosine kinase PYK-2/RAFTK regulates natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxic response, and is translocated and activated upon specific target cell recognition and killing. J Cell Biol. 2000;149(6):1249–1262. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.6.1249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cheung R, Malik M, Ravyn V, Tomkowicz B, Ptasznik A, Collman RG. An arrestin-dependent multikinase signaling complex mediates MIP-1beta/CCL4 signaling and chemotaxis of primary human macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86(4):833–845. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0908551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rumsey LM, Teague RM, Benedict SH, Chan MA. MIP-1alpha induces activation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase that associates with Pyk-2 and is necessary for B-cell migration. Exp Cell Res. 2001;268(1):77–83. doi: 10.1006/excr.2001.5272. doi:10.1006/excr.2001.5272 [doi] S0014-4827(01)95272-3 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Cipolla L, Consonni A, Guidetti G, Canobbio I, Okigaki M, Falasca M, et al. The proline-rich tyrosine kinase Pyk2 regulates platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3 outside-in signaling. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2013;11(2):345–356. doi: 10.1111/jth.12099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jeon MS, Atfield A, Venuprasad K, Krawczyk C, Sarao R, Elly C, et al. Essential role of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b in T cell anergy induction. Immunity. 2004;21(2):167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



