Abstract
As the incidence of complex metabolic disease increases in developed countries, so too does the need to understand the causes and risk factors for these disorders. In addition to the well known contribution of genetics and environment to metabolic dysfunction, many studies have demonstrated that a significant degree of non-genetic heritable risk can be transmitted from parents to offspring over multiple generations. Understanding the mechanisms by which this occurs could change how we study and treat complex metabolic disorders. In this review, we summarize recent advances in this field utilizing Drosophila, mice, and humans, and propose potential molecular mechanisms that underlie the transgenerational inheritance of metabolic state.
Keywords: epigenetics, metabolism, transcription, obesity, diabetes
Introduction
The incidence of complex metabolic disorders has increased at an alarming rate over the past two decades. Approximately one-third of adults and one-sixth of children in the United States fit the medical definition of obesity (1). The incidence of type 2 diabetes is also on the rise, with 7% of American adults diagnosed and likely more undiagnosed (2). Medical costs of these disorders are approaching $200 billion each year (2). A major field of current biomedical research is therefore focused on understanding the progression of complex metabolic disorders and developing potential treatments and preventative strategies.
Both genetic and environmental components contribute to the regulation of metabolism and the risk of metabolic disease. A large percentage of this risk is heritable, but many of the responsible genetic factors remain unidentified. In the past two decades, researchers have explored gene-environment interactions as a potential source of at least some of this unknown risk. These studies have demonstrated an unexpected influence of both parental and developmental nutritional environment on adult metabolic health. What is more, there is now a great deal of evidence suggesting that these induced changes in metabolic state can be inherited for several generations. The transgenerational inheritance of metabolic phenotypes could explain some of the missing heritability in complex disorders and change how we think about metabolic health (3).
Evidence for inheritance of metabolic state in humans
The role of developmental and parental environment in shaping adult metabolism has been strikingly demonstrated in several human studies that followed individuals exposed to extreme nutrient deprivation during gestation. The most famous of these derives from the Dutch Hunger Winter, a period of severe caloric restriction at the end of World War II in German-occupied Holland. Compared to control siblings, individuals exposed to the famine during gestation were at increased risk for metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity (4–6) as well as cardiac-related disorders such as hypertension (4). Similar observations were made in a study focusing on the Chinese famine (1959–1961). Furthermore, this risk was at its highest when gestational famine exposure was followed by consumption of a high calorie, western-style diet later in life, as compared to those who continued to consume a lower calorie diet (7).
The common variable in these and other studies is the contrast between gestational and adult nutritional environments. This research has led to a unifying model for the effects of parental diet on the metabolic state of offspring (Figure 1). Exposure to a change in nutritional environment sets up a metabolic state in the parents that is best suited to that altered environment, and this state is transmitted to the offspring through epigenetic marks in the parental gametes or developing fetus. If, however, progeny nutrition differs from that of the parents, their metabolism will no longer be adapted to the environment. This kind of “mismatch” could be a source of altered risk for developing complex metabolic disorders (8).
Figure 1.
Model for the epigenetic transmission of metabolic state. Parents are exposed to a change in nutritional environment that alters the epigenetic state of their chromatin, both in somatic tissues and in the germline. These changes are transmitted to the progeny, setting up a metabolic state that is best adapted to the parental environment. If the environment of the progeny deviates from that of the parents, their metabolic state is no longer adapted to their environment and disease may occur. Changes in chromatin state are represented by DNA and histone methylation, but can include other post-translational modifications such as acetylation or ubiquitylation. Other mechanisms, such as piRNAs, may also be involved in transmission.
Rodent models for studying the inheritance of metabolic state
Many studies have used rodents to better define the mechanisms underlying the inheritance of metabolic state. In the most commonly used paradigm, a female mouse or rat is fed a low protein or low calorie diet during pregnancy. After birth, the mother and pups are switched to a relatively normal control diet for the duration of their lives (8–17). While the results vary depending on genetic background and the phenotypic outputs measured, they are remarkably similar to the previously discussed human studies. Mice exposed to a low protein diet during gestation have an increased risk of obesity and diabetes (16), cardiovascular disease (14), and other defects (17) (Figure 2). These physiological changes correlate with molecular changes in hepatic gene expression (9,11), increased circulating triglyceride and fatty acid levels (10), an altered distribution of these metabolites throughout the body (13), and changes in DNA methylation (11). In the few cases where it has been measured, physiological and molecular changes extend through several subsequent generations (9,16). In one particular set of studies, expression increased for two metabolic transcriptional regulators, PPARα and glucocorticoid receptor (10,11). There was a correlated decrease in the level of DNA methylation at the promoters of both genes, and supplementation of the maternal diet with folate rescued both phenotypes. Folate is an important dietary precursor to the cofactors required for methyl transfer reactions, suggesting that there is a functional link between the epigenetic marks on DNA and chromatin and the expression of metabolically relevant genes (11). Recent experiments using a folate pathway mutant confirm the importance of normal folate metabolism in epigenetic regulation during development for up to two generations after loss of the mutation, supporting the model that methylation patterns contribute to transgenerational inheritance (18).
Figure 2.

Rodent paradigm for the transgenerational inheritance of metabolic state. Either the maternal or paternal parent is exposed to a genetic or dietary change that alters its physiology. This challenge is removed in the next generation. Regardless of which parent is affected or the mode of alteration used, the F1 and F2 progeny have altered metabolic disease risks and molecular readouts for metabolites and gene expression.
Interpretation of experiments that depend on changes in maternal physiology are complicated by the confounding variable of maternal environment during fetal development. As a result, paternal models have been developed that alter nutritional or metabolic state. Importantly, this work largely agrees with the maternal studies and suggests that both males and females can contribute to metabolic programming. In a study that closely parallels the most commonly used maternal paradigm, male mice were fed a low protein diet prior to mating with females fed the control diet (19). Daughters have significantly altered liver lipids compared to controls, including increased triglycerides and saturated free fatty acids. Metabolic gene expression and DNA methylation patterns are also misregulated. Notably, many of the differentially expressed genes are known targets of metabolic regulators, including PPARα and SREBP. Even more strikingly, expression of PPARα itself is down-regulated in daughter livers, correlating with an increase in DNA methylation upstream from PPARα, albeit at a distal site whose influence over PPARα expression is unclear (19). Other examples corroborate the ability of paternal environment to influence metabolism in the next generation. Offspring from fathers fed a high fat diet display decreased glucose tolerance and altered islet gene expression (20,21). Genetically altering paternal metabolism can also lead to differential molecular and physiological responses in wild-type progeny for several generations (3,22). For example, an allele in the Obrq2A locus is associated with reduced body weight, levels of circulating glucose and insulin, and food intake in fathers. After two or three generations of outcrossing, the progeny continue to display decreased food intake and body weight (22). The clear ability of paternal metabolic state to influence offspring metabolism further supports a model where epigenetic changes in the gametes can lead to heritable changes in offspring metabolism.
Evidence for the inheritance of metabolic state in Drosophila
While great strides have been made using rodent models, the results remain correlative and no specific molecular mechanisms have been discovered. One possible solution to advance the field is to take the paradigm into a simpler model system, specifically the fruit fly Drosophila. Because many epigenetic pathways have been extensively described in fruit flies, a vast number of tools are already available for these studies. Two papers published in the last year have demonstrated that this phenomenon is conserved in Drosophila, providing a foundation for further research in this system(23,24).
In one paper (23), a number of lines derived from single females in a wild population, referred to as iso-female lines, were subjected to either low or high protein relative to sugar, isocaloric diets during larval development. The F1 progeny were subsequently reared on a standard diet. In most of the lines, those progeny whose parents were exposed to the low protein diet have increased glycogen and decreased triglyceride levels as compared to progeny of parents exposed to the high protein diet. Interestingly, these changes are of different magnitudes in different strains, from nearly nonexistent to a two or three-fold difference, with a change in the opposite direction in one strain (23). The results of this study demonstrate that, like mammals, parental diet can influence progeny metabolism in Drosophila. They also show the importance of a controlled and uniform genetic background in order to reproducibly and accurately record these responses.
The second study focuses on responses to a high sugar diet fed to adult females (24). They record slight increases in circulating sugars and decreased glycogen storage in larvae from exposed mothers. A different response, however, is observed when these progeny are followed to adulthood, with decreased glucose and increased glycogen stores in adult males, the opposite of the larval phenotype (Figure 3). Challenge of adult progeny with the high sugar diet exacerbates these phenotypes and leads to more dramatic increases in triglyceride and trehalose levels than that seen in control progeny, indicating a propensity in these progeny toward diet-induced obesity as seen in mammalian studies. Interestingly, increased circulating sugars persist in larval stages through the F2 generation. A number of lipid and carbohydrate metabolic genes also change their expression in the F1 progeny. Unlike metabolite levels, however, some of these changes are not exacerbated when the progeny are challenged with the high sugar diet. On the contrary, for some genes, high sugar challenge in progeny of high sugar-fed mothers equilibrates expression to control levels of low sugar-fed progeny from low sugar-fed parents (24). Although not precisely correlated, these “rescued” changes in gene expression support the model that progeny metabolism is adapted to the parental environment. Taken together, these two papers establish Drosophila as a valid model for studies of the epigenetic inheritance of metabolic state, and provide a foundation for future studies into the mechanisms that underlie this regulation.
Figure 3.
Drosophila display transgenerational inheritance of metabolic state. Female flies are fed a high sugar diet and their offspring are raised on a normal diet (24). F1 larvae have increased glucose and trehalose levels and decreased glycogen levels, while F1 adults show an opposite effect. Adults also display increased triglycerides as compared to controls. Larval changes in glucose and trehalose can be transmitted to the F2 generation.
Potential epigenetic mechanisms
Although several potential epigenetic processes have been proposed to link parental environment with adult progeny metabolism, molecular mechanisms remain to be identified. The evidence that correlates promoter DNA methylation with metabolic gene expression in rodents supports the model that altering DNA methylation levels or locations within the genome could be responsible for the resulting molecular changes (11,19). Attempts to prove this hypothesis, however, have unfortunately fallen short thus far. In the male low protein diet study, correlations were identified between daughter DNA methylation levels and gene expression levels. When male sperm were examined, however, there was no correlation between DNA methylation changes observed in the sperm and the daughters (19).
Direct changes to chromatin can also take the form of histone modifications such as methylation or acetylation. Because these chromatin marks tend to be more dynamic than DNA methylation, their levels have not been examined as closely (25). New evidence, however, suggests potential molecular mechanisms by which histone modifications can be retained through cell division. During mitosis, while the actual histone modifications themselves are often lost, some of the modifiers responsible for these changes, such as the Polycomb and Trithorax complexes, may be retained at the sites (26,27). This type of mechanism could contribute to histone modifications that are inherited through meiotic divisions.
Both histone modifications and DNA methylation undergo drastic changes during embryonic and germ cell development (28–30), such that neither type of mark may be sufficiently retained to transmit the necessary information across generations. Alternative mechanisms involving small non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have therefore been proposed based on epigenetic studies in Drosophila and C. elegans. One example of small ncRNAs directing heritable changes in gene expression is paramutation, which is a form of epigenetic inheritance whereby one allele at a gene locus is capable of inducing a non-genetic change in the paired allele that can be inherited through meiotic divisions (31). An artificial model of paramutation in Drosophila utilizes a tandem array of inserted lacZ transgenes from which the enzyme β-galactosidase is expressed. Some of these arrays are capable of silencing single lacZ transgenes at different loci within the genome (32). It has been recently shown that the production of piRNAs, small RNAs that are important for transposon silencing (33), is required for this effect (31). The piRNA pathway is also involved with the epigenetic repression of other, naturally present transgenes in Drosophila (34). In addition, piRNAs appear to contribute to the transmission of RNAi across generations in C. elegans (35–37). These roles for piRNAs in epigenetic transmission of information for multiple generations in several models and systems suggests that they may be involved in the inheritance of metabolic state. This hypothesis is supported by changes in miRNA expression recorded in mouse testes after feeding a high fat diet (21).
The development of methods to characterize the genome-wide patterns of transcription and epigenetic marks provides a powerful new approach for determining the mechanisms that underlie the transgenerational inheritance of metabolic state. These studies may explain some of the missing heritability in genome-wide association studies of diabetes and obesity. They may also provide a new therapeutic basis for understanding how effects on parental metabolism can impact the metabolic health of offspring, providing new and important insights for early intervention and treatment of complex metabolic diseases.
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Sakonju for helpful comments on this manuscript. R.A.S. and C.S.T. are supported by funding from the NIH (1R01 DK095346).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References and recommended reading
- 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of Obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. 2012 http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/index.html. [PubMed]
- 2.Prevention CfDCa. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. 2011 http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm.
- 3.Nelson VR, Spiezio SH, Nadeau JH. Transgenerational genetic effects of the paternal Y chromosome on daughters’ phenotypes. Epigenomics. 2010;2:513–521. doi: 10.2217/epi.10.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lumey LH, Stein AD, Kahn HS, Romijn JA. Lipid profiles in middle-aged men and women after famine exposure during gestation: the Dutch Hunger Winter Families Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1737–1743. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Rooij SR, Painter RC, Phillips DI, Osmond C, Michels RP, et al. Impaired insulin secretion after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1897–1901. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ravelli AC, van Der Meulen JH, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Bleker OP. Obesity at the age of 50 y in men and women exposed to famine prenatally. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:811–816. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.5.811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li Y, He Y, Qi L, Jaddoe VW, Feskens EJ, et al. Exposure to the Chinese famine in early life and the risk of hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes in adulthood. Diabetes. 2010;59:2400–2406. doi: 10.2337/db10-0385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lillycrop KA. Effect of maternal diet on the epigenome: implications for human metabolic disease. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011;70:64–72. doi: 10.1017/S0029665110004027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoile SP, Lillycrop KA, Thomas NA, Hanson MA, Burdge GC. Dietary protein restriction during F0 pregnancy in rats induces transgenerational changes in the hepatic transcriptome in female offspring. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10*.Burdge GC, Phillips ES, Dunn RL, Jackson AA, Lillycrop KA. Effect of reduced maternal protein consumption during pregnancy in the rat on plasma lipid concentrations and expression of peroxisomal proliferator–activated receptors in the liver and adipose tissue of the offspring. Nutrition Research. 2004;24:639–646. This study correlates changes in progeny metabolic gene expression with physiological changes in response to a maternal low protein diet. [Google Scholar]
- 11*.Lillycrop KA, Phillips ES, Jackson AA, Hanson MA, Burdge GC. Dietary protein restriction of pregnant rats induces and folic acid supplementation prevents epigenetic modification of hepatic gene expression in the offspring. J Nutr. 2005;135:1382–1386. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1382. This study extends the research described in ref. 10 by correlating changes in progeny metabolic gene expression with epigenetic changes at their promotors in response to a maternal low protein diet. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bellinger L, Lilley C, Langley-Evans SC. Prenatal exposure to a maternal low-protein diet programmes a preference for high-fat foods in the young adult rat. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:513–520. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bellinger L, Sculley DV, Langley-Evans SC. Exposure to undernutrition in fetal life determines fat distribution, locomotor activity and food intake in ageing rats. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;30:729–738. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Langley-Evans SC. Fetal programming of cardiovascular function through exposure to maternal undernutrition. Proc Nutr Soc. 2001;60:505–513. doi: 10.1079/pns2001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lucas A, Baker BA, Desai M, Hales CN. Nutrition in pregnant or lactating rats programs lipid metabolism in the offspring. Br J Nutr. 1996;76:605–612. doi: 10.1079/bjn19960066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jimenez-Chillaron JC, Isganaitis E, Charalambous M, Gesta S, Pentinat-Pelegrin T, et al. Intergenerational transmission of glucose intolerance and obesity by in utero undernutrition in mice. Diabetes. 2009;58:460–468. doi: 10.2337/db08-0490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Duque-Guimaraes DE, Ozanne SE. Nutritional programming of insulin resistance: causes and consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2013;24:525–535. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Padmanabhan N, Jia D, Geary-Joo C, Wu X, Ferguson-Smith AC, et al. Mutation in folate metabolism causes epigenetic instability and transgenerational effects on development. Cell. 2013;155:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19**.Carone BR, Fauquier L, Habib N, Shea JM, Hart CE, et al. Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals. Cell. 2010;143:1084–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.008. One of the first articles to explore the influence of paternal dietary exposure on progeny metabolism. This study demonstrated that paternal exposure to a low protein diet results in similar effects on offspring as those seen in prior studies of maternal dietary treatment. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ng SF, Lin RC, Laybutt DR, Barres R, Owens JA, Morris MJ. Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs beta-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring. Nature. 2010;467:963–966. doi: 10.1038/nature09491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fullston T, Ohlsson Teague EM, Palmer NO, DeBlasio MJ, Mitchell M, et al. Paternal obesity initiates metabolic disturbances in two generations of mice with incomplete penetrance to the F2 generation and alters the transcriptional profile of testis and sperm microRNA content. FASEB J. 2013;27:4226–4243. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-224048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yazbek SN, Spiezio SH, Nadeau JH, Buchner DA. Ancestral paternal genotype controls body weight and food intake for multiple generations. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:4134–4144. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23**.Matzkin LM, Johnson S, Paight C, Markow TA. Preadult parental diet affects offspring development and metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059530. The first study demonstrating that parental diet in Drosophila has an impact on progeny metabolism, as well as the influence of genetic backgrounds on this response. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24**.Buescher JL, Musselman LP, Wilson CA, Lang T, Keleher M, et al. Evidence for transgenerational metabolic programming in Drosophila. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6:1123–1132. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011924. This study focused on the detrimental effects of a maternal high sugar diet on offspring metabolism for up to two generations, under multiple conditions and at two life stages. They also began to connect the physiological effects observed with changes in gene expression. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kirchner H, Osler ME, Krook A, Zierath JR. Epigenetic flexibility in metabolic regulation: disease cause and prevention? Trends Cell Biol. 2013;23:203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Petruk S, Sedkov Y, Johnston DM, Hodgson JW, Black KL, et al. TrxG and PcG proteins but not methylated histones remain associated with DNA through replication. Cell. 2012;150:922–933. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Francis NJ, Follmer NE, Simon MD, Aghia G, Butler JD. Polycomb proteins remain bound to chromatin and DNA during DNA replication in vitro. Cell. 2009;137:110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hajkova P, Ancelin K, Waldmann T, Lacoste N, Lange UC, et al. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature. 2008;452:877–881. doi: 10.1038/nature06714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hajkova P, Erhardt S, Lane N, Haaf T, El-Maarri O, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev. 2002;117:15–23. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00181-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee J, Inoue K, Ono R, Ogonuki N, Kohda T, et al. Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development. 2002;129:1807–1817. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.8.1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31**.de Vanssay A, Bouge AL, Boivin A, Hermant C, Teysset L, et al. Paramutation in Drosophila linked to emergence of a piRNA-producing locus. Nature. 2012;490:112–115. doi: 10.1038/nature11416. This study was groundbreaking in that it connected information transmitted non-genetically for multiple generations with the production of piRNAs. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ronsseray S, Boivin A, Anxolabehere D. P-Element repression in Drosophila melanogaster by variegating clusters of P-lacZ-white transgenes. Genetics. 2001;159:1631–1642. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.4.1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Castel SE, Martienssen RA. RNA interference in the nucleus: roles for small RNAs in transcription, epigenetics and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:100–112. doi: 10.1038/nrg3355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Grentzinger T, Armenise C, Brun C, Mugat B, Serrano V, et al. piRNA-mediated transgenerational inheritance of an acquired trait. Genome Res. 2012;22:1877–1888. doi: 10.1101/gr.136614.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35*.Ashe A, Sapetschnig A, Weick EM, Mitchell J, Bagijn MP, et al. piRNAs can trigger a multigenerational epigenetic memory in the germline of C. elegans. Cell. 2012;150:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.018. One of several papers that connects the piRNA pathway with the inheritance of RNAi phenotypes in C. elegans. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36*.Shirayama M, Seth M, Lee HC, Gu W, Ishidate T, et al. piRNAs initiate an epigenetic memory of nonself RNA in the C. elegans germline. Cell. 2012;150:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015. One of several papers that connects the piRNA pathway with the inheritance of RNAi phenotypes in C. elegans. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37*.Buckley BA, Burkhart KB, Gu SG, Spracklin G, Kershner A, et al. A nuclear Argonaute promotes multigenerational epigenetic inheritance and germline immortality. Nature. 2012;489:447–451. doi: 10.1038/nature11352. One of several papers that connects the piRNA pathway with the inheritance of RNAi phenotypes in C. elegans. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


