Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2014 Aug 7;2(4):e00744-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00744-14

Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus subtilis BAB-1, a Biocontrol Agent for Suppression of Tomato Gray Mold

Qinggang Guo 1, Shezeng Li 1, Xiuyun Lu 1, Xiaoyun Zhang 1, Peipei Wang 1, Ping Ma 1,
PMCID: PMC4125768  PMID: 25103757

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis BAB-1, isolated from cotton rhizosphere soil, is an excellent biocontrol agent for tomato gray mold. The genome of B. subtilis strain BAB-1 was fully sequenced and annotated, genes encoding the antifungal active compound were identified, and multiple sets of regulatory systems were found in the genome.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacillus subtilis has been widely studied and used for plant disease control. The contributing factors to the success of this bacterium include the production of various antimicrobial compounds (1), competition for nutrition and niche with plant pathogens (2), and induced systemic resistance to pathogens (3). B. subtilis strain BAB-1, isolated from cotton rhizosphere soil, showed strong inhibitory ability against the growth of phytopathogens in vitro. In addition, strain BAB-1 had been identified as an excellent biocontrol agent for tomato gray mold (4). Phylogenetic trees based on the gyrB and phoR gene sequences revealed that strain BAB-1 was closely related to B. subtilis 168 (5). To clarify the biocontrol mechanism and facilitate the detection of strain BAB-1, we sequenced and annotated the complete genome sequence of the strain.

Whole-genome sequencing of strain BAB-1 was performed with an Illumina GA IIx analyzer at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) in China. Sequence reads were generated from a 500-bp paired-end library, giving 600-Mb sequences with approximately 120× genome sequence coverage. The paired reads were de novo assembled with SOAPdenovo v. 1.03 software (BGI) (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html) based on the genome sequence of type strain B. subtilis 168 (AL009126.3), and 98.6% of the reads were assembled into 23 large scaffolds. Most of the gaps within the scaffolds were filled by local assembly of Solexa reads. The remaining gaps between scaffolds were filled by sequencing of PCR amplification using an ABI 3730 sequencer. Protein-encoding genes, rRNA operons, and tRNAs were predicted by Glimmer v. 3.0 (6). Annotation was performed using the Rapid Annotation Using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (7).

The complete genome sequence of strain BAB-1 is composed of a circular 4,021,944-bp chromosome with mean GC content of 43.89%. There are 4,104 coding genes, 376 rRNAs, and 48 tRNAs in the chromosome. Approximately 5.2% of the strain BAB-1 genome is devoted to synthesis of antimicrobial products, including nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) antibiotics, polyketide synthase (PKS) antibiotics, and lantibiotics, as well as bacillibactin. Among those products, the lipopeptides surfactin and fengycin were identified from strain BAB-1 by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The fengycin was identified as a major antifungal active compound in inhibition against the growth of Botrytis cinerea, and when applied in combination with fengycin, the surfactin showed synergistic actions, which were confirmed by antifungal assay in vivo (8). The iturin lipopeptides have a strong antifungal ability, but gene clusters for iturin lipopeptides are absent from the genome of strain BAB-1. As in other prokaryotes, two-component signal transduction systems of B. subtilis are important elements of the adaptive response to a variety of external conditions (9). A total of 35 two-component systems (TCS) were identified from the genome of strain BAB-1, including the biocontrol function-related TCS comP/comA (10), phoR/phoP (11), and degU/degS (12). Finally, we identified 86 transposons, 25 phage-like elements, and type III restriction modification systems in strain BAB-1 genome.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The complete genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank under accession no. CP004405.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the National High Technology Research and Development Program (“863” Program) of China (2011AA10A205), the Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest (201303025), and the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (31272085).

Footnotes

Citation Guo Q, Li S, Lu X, Zhang X, Wang P, Ma P. 2014. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis BAB-1, a biocontrol agent for suppression of tomato gray mold. Genome Announc. 2(4):e00744-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00744-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Stein T. 2005. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol. Microbiol. 56:845–857. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Morris CE, Monier JM. 2003. The ecological significance of biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 41:429–453. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.022103.134521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Desoignies N, Schramme F, Ongena M, Legrève A. 2013. Systemic resistance induced by Bacillus lipopeptides in Beta vulgaris reduces infection by the rhizomania disease vector Polymyxa betae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 14:416–421. 10.1111/mpp.12008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wang WQ, Ma P, Han XY, Lu XY, Zhang XF. 2011. Control effect of joint application of bio-fungicides and synthesized fungicides on cucumber diseases. Chin. J. Biol. Control 1:104–109 [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Guo Q, Li S, Lu X, Li B, Stummer B, Dong W, Ma P. 2012. phoR sequences as a phylogenetic marker to differentiate the species in the Bacillus subtilis group. Can. J. Microbiol. 58:1295–1305. 10.1139/w2012-106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li B, Lu X, Guo Q, Qian C, Li S, Ma P. 2010. Isolation and identification of lipopeptides and volatile compounds produced by Bacillus subtilis strain BAB-1. Sci. Agric. Sinica 43:3547–3554 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yang SJ, Bayer AS, Mishra NN, Meehl M, Ledala N, Yeaman MR, Xiong YQ, Cheung AL. 2012. The Staphylococcus aureus two-component regulatory system, GraRS, senses and confers resistance to selected cationic antimicrobial peptides. Infect. Immun. 80:74–81. 10.1128/IAI.05669-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wang X, Luo C, Liu Y, Nie Y, Liu Y, Zhang R, Chen Z. 2010. Three nonaspartate amino acid mutations in the ComA response regulator receiver motif severely decrease surfactin production, competence development and spore formation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20:301–310. 10.1016/j.nbt.2009.06.975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Guo Q, Li S, Lu X, Li B, Ma P. 2010. PhoR/PhoP two-component regulatory system affects biocontrol capability of Bacillus subtilis NCD-2. Genet. Mol. Biol. 33:333–340. 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mariappan A, Makarewicz O, Chen XH, Borriss R. 2012. Two-component response regulator DegU controls the expression of bacilysin in plant-growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 22:114–125. 10.1159/000338804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES