Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2014 Aug 7;2(4):e00776-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00776-14

Draft Genome Sequences of Clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strains Isolated in Maryland (2010–2013)

Julie Haendiges a, Ruth Timme b, Marc Allard b, Robert A Myers a, Justin Payne b, Eric W Brown b, Peter Evans b, Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona b,
PMCID: PMC4125775  PMID: 25103764

Abstract

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is the leading cause of food-borne illnesses associated with the consumption of raw shellfish worldwide. Here, we report 45 draft genomes of V. parahaemolyticus. Thirty-five of them are strains that were isolated from clinical cases in the state of Maryland from 2010 to 2013. The remaining 10 strains were historical isolates, isolated mostly from the West Coast of the United States during the period of 1988 to 2004. The availability of these genomes will allow for future phylogenetic analyses with other V. parahaemolyticus strains.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a natural inhabitant of temperate and tropical coastal waters and is the leading cause of seafood-borne gastroenteritis in the United States (1). Cases of the illness are usually associated with eating raw or undercooked seafood. Strains of V. parahaemolyticus carrying genes for thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) and/or thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin (trh) are associated pathogenic strains (2) and represent <1% of the environmental V. parahaemolyticus strains (3). During the last two decades, V. parahaemolyticus infections and outbreaks have increased in number throughout the world. Most of these new cases belong to the pandemic clonal complex 3 (CC3) (47).

The emergence of CC3 has elevated public health concerns of the worldwide spread of V. parahaemolyticus, previously uncharacteristic of this pathogen. The existence of other V. parahaemolyticus CCs (CC36 and CC34) has been observed among the coastal United States strains (4). Although infections in the United States are typically caused by strains from the CC36 endemic to the West Coast (4, 8), an outbreak in Maryland in August 2012 (7) was caused by strains belonging to the pandemic clonal complex 3 (CC3). A total of 56 cases associated with V. parahaemolyticus were reported between 2010 and 2013 in the state of Maryland. We sequenced 35 of these V. parahaemolyticus outbreak strains isolated from those cases to better understand the potential changes in the V. parahaemolyticus populations on this coastal state (Table 1). Ten additional historical V. parahaemolyticus strains from different sources (clinical and environmental) were also sequenced (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

List of the V. parahaemolyticus strains sequenced in this study and their GenBank accession no.

Strains WGS accession no.a CFSAN no. No. of contigs ST State of isolation Yr of isolation Sourceb
VP1 JNSM00000000 CFSAN007429 285 631 MD 2012 C
VP8 JNSN00000000 CFSAN007430 298 631 MD 2012 C
VP9 JNSO00000000 CFSAN007431 278 631 MD 2012 C
VP31 JNSP00000000 CFSAN007432 273 631 MD 2013 C
VP35 JNSQ00000000 CFSAN007433 319 631 MD 2013 C
VP41 JNSR00000000 CFSAN007434 233 631 MD 2013 C
VP44 JNSS00000000 CFSAN007435 223 631 MD 2013 C
VP45 JNST00000000 CFSAN007436 214 631 MD 2013 C
VP2 JNSU00000000 CFSAN007437 243 651 MD 2012 C
VP3 JNSV00000000 CFSAN007438 212 652 MD 2012 C
VP4 JNSW00000000 CFSAN007439 184 653 MD 2012 C
VP34 JNSX00000000 CFSAN007440 249 653 MD 2013 C
VP5 JNSY00000000 CFSAN007441 286 113 MD 2012 C
VP7 JNSZ00000000 CFSAN007442 287 113 MD 2012 C
VP11 JNTA00000000 CFSAN007443 283 113 MD 2012 C
VP6 JNTB00000000 CFSAN007444 135 677 MD 2012 C
VP10 JNTC00000000 CFSAN007445 203 43 MD 2012 C
VP13 JNTD00000000 CFSAN007446 137 678 MD 2012 C
VP14 JNTE00000000 CFSAN007447 214 162 MD 2012 C
VP15 JNTF00000000 CFSAN007448 232 679 MD 2012 C
VP16 JNTG00000000 CFSAN007449 147 3 MD 2012 C
VP17 JNTH00000000 CFSAN007450 157 3 MD 2012 C
VP18 JNTI00000000 CFSAN007451 129 3 MD 2012 C
VP19 JNTJ00000000 CFSAN007452 304 8 MD 2010 C
VP20 JNTK00000000 CFSAN007453 186 8 MD 2010 C
VP39 JNTL00000000 CFSAN007455 217 896 MD 2013 C
VP12 JNTM00000000 CFSAN006129 284 36 MD 2012 C
VP32 JNTN00000000 CFSAN006131 281 36 MD 2013 C
VP33 JNTO00000000 CFSAN006132 283 36 MD 2013 C
VP36 JNTP00000000 CFSAN006133 276 36 MD 2013 C
VP38 JNTQ00000000 CFSAN006134 215 36 MD 2013 C
VP40 JNTR00000000 CFSAN006135 250 36 MD 2013 C
VP42 JNTS00000000 CFSAN007460 279 36 MD 2013 C
VP43 JNTT00000000 CFSAN007461 185 36 MD 2013 C
VP30 JNTV00000000 CFSAN006130 269 36 MD 2013 C
029-1(b) JNTW00000000 CFSAN001611 120 36 OR 1997 E
48057 JNTX00000000 CFSAN001612 111 36 WA 1990 C
K1198 JNTY00000000 CFSAN001614 130 59 AK 2004 E
10292 JNTZ00000000 CFSAN001617 126 50 WA 1997 C
48291 JNUA00000000 CFSAN001618 105 36 WA 1990 C
F11-3A JNUB00000000 CFSAN001619 104 36 WA 1988 E
NY-3483 JNUC00000000 CFSAN001620 125 36 NY 1998 E
K1203 JNUD00000000 CFSAN001173 209 59 AK 2004 E
98-513-F52 JNUE00000000 CFSAN001160 120 34 LA 1998 E
10290 JNUF00000000 CFSAN001613 151 36 WA 1997 C
a

WGS- NCBI whole-genome shotgun assembly database.

b

C, clinical; E, environmental; ST, sequence type.

The genomes were sequenced using Ion Torrent, and in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (4) showed that these isolates exhibited diverse sequence types (STs) (Table 1). DNA from each strain was isolated from overnight cultures with the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The genomes were sequenced using the Ion Torrent (PGM) sequencing system. The 36 strains from Maryland were sequenced using 300-bp read chemistry (Life Technologies), while the 10 historical strains were sequenced using 200-bp read chemistry, according to manufacturer’s instructions, at 17 to 68× coverage using the Ion PGM 200 or 300 sequencing kit, respectively, depending of the template used, according to manufacturer’s instructions. The genomic sequence contigs for each strain were de novo assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 5.5.1 (CLC bio, Germantown, MD, USA). The G+C mol% of the strains was between 45.1 and 45.4%, which is similar to the reported G+C contents for other V. parahaemolyticus strains. The sequences were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/Pipeline.html) (9). A detailed report of a full comparative analysis between these V. parahaemolyticus genomes will be included in a future publication.

This large data release contributes to the efforts of a newly created V. parahaemolyticus BioProject (no. PRJNA245882) at the NCBI, spearheaded by the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN)-FDA and the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH) of the state of Maryland, in order to improve the detection of new strains or track the emergence of new clonal strains in geographical regions where these strains are not endemic.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome sequences of the 45 V. parahaemolyticus strains are available in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was supported by the FDA Foods Program Intramural Funds.

We thank Lili Fox Vélez for her editorial assistance on this genome announcement.

Footnotes

Citation Haendiges J, Timme R, Allard M, Myers RA, Payne J, Brown EW, Evans P, Gonzalez-Escalona N. 2014. Draft genome sequences of clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated in Maryland (2010–2013). Genome Announc. 2(4):e00776-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00776-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM. 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:7–15. 10.3201/eid1701.P11101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Turner JW, Paranjpye RN, Landis ED, Biryukov SV, González-Escalona N, Nilsson WB, Strom MS. 2013. Population structure of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus from the Pacific Northwest Coast of the United States. PLoS One 8:e55726. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. DePaola A, Kaysner CA, Bowers J, Cook DW. 2000. Environmental investigations of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters after outbreaks in Washington, Texas, and New York. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4649–4654. 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4649-4654.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. González-Escalona N, Martinez-Urtaza J, Romero J, Espejo RT, Jaykus LA, Depaola A. 2008. Determination of molecular phylogenetics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains by multilocus sequence typing. J. Bacteriol. 190:2831–2840. 10.1128/JB.01808-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Martinez-Urtaza J, Simental L, Velasco D, DePaola A, Ishibashi M, Nakaguchi Y, Nishibuchi M, Carrera-Flores D, Rey-Alvarez C, Pousa A. 2005. Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6, Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1319–1320. 10.3201/eid1108.050322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Dutta B, Takeda Y, Sack DA. 2007. Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20:39–48. 10.1128/CMR.00025-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Haendiges J, Rock M, Myers RA, Brown EW, Evans P, Gonzalez-Escalona N. 2014. Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Maryland, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20:718–720. 10.3201/eid2004.130818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Abbott SL, Powers C, Kaysner CA, Takeda Y, Ishibashi M, Joseph SW, Janda JM. 1989. Emergence of a restricted bioserovar of Vibrio parahaemolyticus as the predominant cause of Vibrio-associated gastroenteritis on the West Coast of the United States and Mexico. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:2891–2893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Klimke W, Agarwala R, Badretdin A, Chetvernin S, Ciufo S, Fedorov B, Kiryutin B, O’Neill K, Resch W, Resenchuk S, Schafer S, Tolstoy I, Tatusova T. 2009. The National Center for Biotechnology Information’s Protein Clusters Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D216–D223. 10.1093/nar/gkn734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES