Medication adherence: a review of pharmacy education, research, practice and policy in Finland

Abstract

Aims

To describe pharmacy education, research, practice and policy related to medication adherence in Finland since the year 2000.

Methods

The three universities that provide pharmacy education (Åbo Akademi, University of Eastern Finland, and University of Helsinki) completed a structured pro-forma questionnaire regarding education related to medication adherence. A MEDLINE and EMBASE literature search was performed to identify English language peer-reviewed research that reported medication compliance, adherence or persistence. The Ministry of Social Affairs and Health was invited to nominate policies and documents related to medication adherence. A narrative review of medication counselling practices and professional service delivery through Finnish community pharmacies was undertaken.

Results

Medication adherence was a theme integrated into obligatory and elective courses for bachelors and masters degree students. The literature search identified 33 English language peer-reviewed research articles reporting medication compliance, adherence or persistence published since the year 2000. Policy documents of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health recognise that poor medication adherence may lead to suboptimal treatment outcomes, and encourage patient participation in treatment decision making. Adherence practice in Finnish pharmacies has been strongly linked to the development of medication counselling services.

Conclusions

Adherence research and education has focused on understanding and addressing the contextual factors that contribute to medication nonadherence. Adherence practice in community pharmacies has tended to focus on medication counselling and programs specific to particular disease states. Medication adherence is a topic that is integrated into courses for bachelor’s and master’s level pharmacy students in Finland.

INTRODUCTION

Medication non-adherence has been recognised as a preventable cause of treatment failure in Finland and internationally.1-3 Adherence to beneficial medication therapy has been associated with lower mortality, while adherence to harmful medication therapy has been associated with increased mortality.4

Medication adherence has been defined as the extent to which a patient’s behaviour matches agreed recommendations from the prescriber.5 Patient compliance has been defined as the extent to which a patient’s behaviour matches the prescriber’s recommendations.5 Medication adherence emphasises the need for agreement and, therefore, has largely replaced the term patient compliance (the latter term has been judged paternalistic by some authors).6 Medication persistence refers to the act of continuing the treatment for the prescribed duration.7 It is often defined as the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation. However, there are inconsistencies in how these concepts have been operationalised and a variety of methods by which they are measured.6-10 Not all data sources permit researchers to assess agreement in medication taking (for example, health registers and pharmacy administrative databases).

There has been a long tradition of conducting research into medication adherence in Finland since the 1970s and 1980s.11-16 All health professionals in Finland have a professional obligation to ensure that patients are provided with information to facilitate the rational use of medications. In contrast to some other countries, medication adherence in Finland has historically been studied and taught from a health-system and patient perspective. The philosophy behind this approach has been the desire to better understand the contextual factors that contribute to medication non-adherence. Traditional methods of estimating medication adherence (including use of prescription claims records, pharmacy dispensing data, validated survey instruments or electronic pill counters) may themselves provide little insight into the reasons for non-adherence.17 Consistent with the health-system perspective, medication adherence research has been conducted by pharmacy, medical, nursing and dental researchers. An important development for adherence-related practice and research in Finland was the establishment of the Finnish National Prescription Register in 1993 (with complete data available since 1994).18 Register-based epidemiology is a form of epidemiological research that involves using data from health registers.19 The Finnish National Prescription Register includes patient level data on reimbursed medications for all 5.3 million Finnish residents. Data from a health register can be linked with data from another register (a ‘register linkage study’) or be supplemented by survey or clinical data. This has provided the opportunity to quantitatively investigate factors associated with adherence and persistence at a national population level. However, in comparison to several other countries, relatively little research has focused on interventions to improve adherence.20-23

The objective of this review was to describe pharmacy education, research, practice and policy related to medication adherence in Finland since the year 2000. This review forms part of an international series of articles describing pharmacy education, research, practice and policy in relation to adherence in different countries.

METHODS

Pharmacy education related to adherence

University lecturers or instructors at each of the three institutions that offer bachelor's and/or master's level pharmacy education in Finland were contacted and asked to complete a structured proforma questionnaire regarding the content and duration of the education they provided in relation to adherence. These institutions were the (1) Åbo Akademi, (2) University of Eastern Finland (University of Kuopio prior to 2010), and (3) University of Helsinki. The University of Eastern Finland and University of Helsinki provide both bachelor's and master's level pharmacy educationin Finnish. The Åbo Akademi provides bachelor's level pharmacy education in Swedish.

Adherence research

For the purpose of this review, adherence research was deemed to include that related to compliance, adherence, or persistence with prescription or nonprescription medications. Due to the fact that adherence-related research in Finland has been characterised by a health-system approach and multidisciplinary collaboration, the review of published research was not limited to that conducted by pharmacists.

MEDLINE was searched using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms “patient education”, “medication adherence”, “patient compliance”, and “drug information services” combined with “Finland”. A title search was performed using the terms “compliance”, “adherence” and “persistence” combined with “Finland”. An author search was conducted using names of key medical and pharmacy researchers in Finland. EMBASE was searched using the EMTREE term “patient compliance” combined with “Finland”. The reference lists of articles retrieved were screened to identify any additional articles meeting the review inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria for adherence research were that a study 1) quantitatively or qualitatively reported an estimate of medication adherence, or factors associated with medication adherence, and 2) be published in an English language peer-reviewed journal. The search was limited to research published from 2000 until present. All study designs were considered for review. However, reports of pharmaceutical company sponsored randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating specific active ingredients were excluded (for example, RCT investigating use of orlistat in patients treated with clozapine or olanzapine).24 Reports of multicentre research studies in which Finnish researchers or hospitals were part of an international collaboration were also excluded (for example, multi-centre research into adherence with osteoporosis medications).25 Each identified article that met the review inclusion criteria was systematically reviewed according to the year of publication, study design, study sample, main outcome measures and main findings.

Adherence policy

The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (MSAH) is the organ of government responsible for ensuring that there are sufficient social and health services. The MSAH was contacted and asked to nominate policies and documents relevant to medication adherence. This was because the MSAH is responsible for drafting legislation, designing health reforms, and implementing the government’s health care program.26 These policies and documents were then qualitatively reviewed for content related to medication adherence.

Community pharmacy practice related to adherence

A narrative review of medication counselling practices and professional service delivery through Finnish community pharmacies was undertaken to supplement an earlier article on this topic.27 This method was selected because there is no professional pharmacy program specifically focused on improving or monitoring medication adherence in Finland. However, adherence practice in Finnish pharmacies has been strongly linked to the development of medication counselling services.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pharmacy education related to adherence

Pharmacy education in Finland has been undergoing reform so that it is consistent with the principles outlined in the Bologna Declaration, an agreement signed by 29 European countries in 1999 to create a common framework for higher education across Europe.28 The two pharmacy degree qualifications are the Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy (BSc. Pharm) and the Master of Science in Pharmacy (MSc. Pharm).

The Bachelor’s degree involves three years of study and includes up to six months of practical training in a community pharmacy (with the option to spend three months working in a hospital). The six months practical training is divided into two three-month periods to ensure a close integration between university-based and practical training.28 An objective of the Bachelor’s degree is to develop professional competencies required for work in community pharmacies. The curriculum is based on chemistry, pharmaceutics, and the biomedical and social sciences.27 Bachelor's graduates are called “farmaseutti” and 90% of those who do not continue studying for their Master's degree work in a community pharmacy after graduation.29,30 Graduates with a Bachelor's degree program are occasionally referred to as “prescriptionists.” However, they commonly undertake roles performed by pharmacists in other countries. This can include taking responsibility for the operation of a main or subsidiary pharmacy when the owner is not present.

The Master’s degree requires an additional two years of coursework and also involves completing a research project in a discipline of the student's choice.27 Pharmacists must be educated to at least the Master's level before they can apply to own a community pharmacy. Following graduation sixty percent of Master's degree graduates work in community pharmacies as salaried pharmacists or owners.29,30

Education is not as clinically oriented as in some other countries including the United States, United Kingdom and Australia.31-33 However, courses have been developed to be consistent with national and international professional guidelines.28 This includes Directives of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union that relate to pharmacy education.34 Curriculum reform has also been guided by external and internal feedback and evaluation.35,36 The Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees do not include courses specific to medication adherence. However, medication adherence is a theme that has increasingly been integrated into Bachelor’s and Master’s level courses for pharmacy students. Medication adherence is a theme that is covered in many courses throughout the degrees (Table 1). Bachelor’s and Master’s level pharmacists can undertake an 18-month postgraduate training course to perform comprehensive medication reviews for people at high-risk of experiencing medication-related problems, including medication non-adherence.37

Table 1.

Pharmacy education related to adherence in Finland

University	Degree (year)	Obligatory or elective	Course name and credit points (ECTS)	Content specific to adherence
Åbo Akademi	BSc (1)	Obligatory	Medication use and patient counselling (3)	Concept of compliance, concordance and empowerment and related factors. Students perform literature search, produce report, and participate in group discussions
	BSc (2)	Obligatory	Pharmacy management and economy (3)	Above concepts from perspective of customers and pharmacies. Introduction to role of pharmacist and the importance of adherence counselling. Content related to importance of medication adherence for patient’s health and health costs
	BSc (3)	Obligatory	Pharmacotherapy (3)	Adherence related issues are discussed throughout the course. Consideration given to patient groups with special needs, e.g. children and older people
	BSc (2)	Obligatory	Pharmacology of over-the-counter medications (2)
	BSc (1-3)	Obligatory	Courses in pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics (various)	Adherence related issues discussed in courses (e.g. the importance of dosage form for medication adherence)
University of Eastern Finland	BSc (1)	Obligatory	Medicines in healthcare (3.5)	Correct and incorrect use of medications, problems related to medication use, patient counselling in community pharmacies, clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care, conducting and reporting a patient interview
	BSc (2-3)	Obligatory	Communication skills and patient counselling in a pharmacy (8)	Adherence related issues are discussed throughout the course. Includes practical classes in which students need to provide counselling that supports adherence
	BSc (2-3)	Obligatory	Pharmacotherapy (6)	Adherence related issues are discussed throughout the course
	BSc (3)	Obligatory	Current issues in health care (1.5)	Students prepare and present in-house training sessions. Themes introduced in the Medicines in Healthcare course are further developed. There is a special focus on children, older people and other specific patient groups
	MSc (4)	Obligatory for students specialising in social pharmacy	Theoretical social pharmacy (6)	History of social pharmacy research (in which compliance has been an important topic). Concepts and theories of compliance, adherence, concordance and empowerment are covered
	MSc (4-5)	Elective	Geriatric pharmacotherapy (2)	Adherence related issues are discussed throughout the course
	BSc & MSc	Obligatory	Courses in pharmacology and biopharmaceutics (various)	Adherence related issues are covered to some extent
University of Helsinki	BSc (2)	Obligatory	Patient education and counselling (3)	All 3 courses are integrated and include some content specific to adherence including: an overview of concordance, empowerment, and self-management, epidemiology of adherence, different forms of non-adherence, determinants of adherence, ways to improve adherence in a pharmacy, relation between medication information and adherence, lifestyle issues that relate to adherence and medication therapy. There are self-learning materials for students that include content specific to adherence, concordance, empowerment and self-management
	BSc (2)	Obligatory	Counselling skills (1)
	BSc (2)	Obligatory	Pharmacotherapy I (3)
	BSc (3)	Obligatory	Medicines in healthcare (5)	Teaching related to the above concepts is covered in greater depth. Medication adherence among special patient populations (e.g. older people, and people with depression) is discussed. More focus is put on research and theories related to medication use, adherence and concordance
	BSc (3)	Obligatory	Pharmacotherapy II (3)	Topics covered during Pharmacotherapy I course are covered in greater depth with prescription medications and long-term therapy
	MSc (4)	Obligatory for students specialising in social pharmacy. Otherwise an elective course	Medication review and clinical pharmacy (4)	Topics covered include: determinants of adherence/non-adherence, ways to improve adherence, instruments/scales to measure adherence in medication reviews
University of Helsinki	MSc (4-5)	Obligatory and elective courses	Social pharmacy courses: Health Promotion (4) Smoking cessation (3-4) Drug information and drug information services (4) Clinical pharmacy (3)	Adherence, concordance, empowerment, and self-management discussed throughout the courses
	MSc (4-5)	Obligatory for students specialising in pharmacology	Clinical pharmacology (3 op)	Adherence related issues discussed throughout the course

ECTS=European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (1 credit equivalent to 26.7 hours work)

Adherence research

The systematic search of English language peer-reviewed literature published from 2000 until present identified 33 Finnish papers that reported compliance, adherence or persistence with medications (Table 2). Thirteen papers focused on cardiovascular medications (including statins and antihypertensive medications)38-50, and 12 papers on medications for mental or neurological disorders (including antidepressants, antiepileptics, and medications for opioid dependence).51-62 The remaining papers investigated compliance or adherence in relation to medications for glaucoma63, diabetes62,64-68, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis62,69, and asthma.21,62 Seven papers assessed compliance or adherence to health treatment regimens (including medication compliance and adherence) among children and adolescents.56,57,59,62,64,65,69

Table 2.

Finnish research into factors associated with compliance, adherence and persistence in English language peer-reviewed journals since 2000

Author, date and reference number	Study design and/or data source	Study sample	Relevant outcome measure(s)	Main findings
Foulon et al. 201059	Register-based study (National Prescription Register)	Children and adolescents aged ≤ 19 (n=27,676) who received a reimbursed antidepressant from 1998-2005	Percentage of children and adolescents dispensed only one antidepressant prescription (maximum duration 3 months) (S)	31% of children and adolescents received only one reimbursed antidepressant prescription (maximum persistence 3 months)
Lunnela et al. 201063	Qualitative interviews	12 compliant patients with glaucoma	Perceived importance of education and social support received from healthcare personnel, relatives and peers among compliant patients with glaucoma	Individual variation in the need for education and support in relation to compliance. Important to receive education and support during initial stages of illness and following treatment change
Helin-Salmivaara et al. 201040	Register-based study (National Prescription Register)	490,024 new users of statins in yearly cohorts from 1995 to 2005	One year persistence with statin therapy. Proportion of days covered among patients who discontinued within 365 days since initiation	Compared with the 1995 cohort, the 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 cohorts were less likely to discontinue treatment within 12-months. Hazard ratios for discontinuation ranged from 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) in 1998 to 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83) in 2004
Meretoja et al. 200950	Register linkage study (National Prescription Register, National Hospital Discharge Register)	5,586 patients discharged from hospital following admission for a stroke in 2005	Reimbursed purchases for secondary preventative (warfarin, aspirin+dipyridamole or clopidogrel) and cardiovascular medications in pharmacies pre and post hospital admission for stroke	33% of patients did not collect prescription(s) for any secondary preventative medication following hospital discharge. The prevalence of antihypertensive use increased from 64% pre-stroke to 78% post-stroke. The prevalence of statin use increased from 25% pre-stroke to 58% post-stroke
Tacke et al. 200951	Observational study	12 patients who received buprenorphine/naloxone for 6 days in a compliance-monitoring device	Regularity of daily administration, treatment costs, and patients’ views on acceptability and drug diversion	Six patients demonstrated good compliance and 2 patients demonstrated minor irregularities. Seven patients reported the package was too large, 5 patients positive treatment influence, 3 patients that it stopped diversion and 1 patient thought the package was difficult to use
Keränen et al. 200952	Retrospective medical record review	94 patients (mean age 59 years) with Parkinson’s Disease	Persistence with pramipexole at 1, 3 and 6 years based on physicians records at university hospital	76%, 63% and 63% of patients were still taking pramipexole at 1, 3 and 6 years respectively. Predictors of discontinuation were orthostatic hypotension and entacapone treatment prior to initiation of pramipexole
Helin-Salmivaara et al. 200939	Register-based study (National Prescription Register)	562,598 new users of statins in Finland from 1995-2005	Discontinuation defined using period covered by the last prescription followed by a tablet-free gap exceeding 270 days	Persons with diabetes (15%) were more likely to be taking a statin one-year after initiation compared to those without diabetes (77.1% vs. 73.8%). Risk for discontinuation was lower among male than female diabetic persons OR 0.94 (95%CI 0.91-0.96)
Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä et al. 200960	Qualitative interviews	29 people with depression who had used the Internet to access drug information	Self-reported impact of using online drug information on medication taking behaviour (S)	Self-reported impacts of utilising online drug information included being reassured, deciding to change a dose, to discontinue a medication and to suggest a new medication to a physician
Nabi et al. 200841	Register-based study (National Prescription Register) combined with postal survey	1,021 hypertensive patients aged 26-63 years participating in the Finnish Public Sector Cohort Study	Treatment adherence defined according to 12-month reimbursed medication supply (0 days non-adherence, 1-364 days partial adherence, 365 days adherence). Sense of coherence measured using Orientation to Life Questionnaire	60% of patients were adherent, 36% partially adherent, and 4% nonadherent. A high sense of coherence was associated with lower odds of being nonadherent (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96)
Holma et al. 200853	Prospective cohort study (Vantaa Depression Study)	218 patients with major depressive disorder	Antidepressant adherence categorised as regular, somewhat irregular, very irregular, or not at all	Antidepressant adherence in acute treatment phase independently predicted maintenance treatment (OR 3.18; 95% CI 1-12-9.03)
Helin-Salmivaara et al. 200838	Register-based study (National Prescription Register)	18,072 new users of statins in 1995	Persistence (time from initiation to discontinuation) and adherence (proportion of days covered by treatment)	10-year statin persistence in general population was 44%. Persons aged 45-74 years at initiation and those with ≥1 prescription for another cardiovascular drug most likely to continue to fifth year. Adherence was highest among persistent users (94%)
Sokero et al. 200858	Prospective cohort study (Vantaa Depression Study)	218 patients with major depressive disorder (mean age 41 years, 91 not suicidal, 92 suicidal ideation, 34 history of suicide attempts).	Antidepressant adherence categorised as regular, somewhat irregular, very irregular, or not at all on basis of patient interview	Self-reported adherence did not differ between those patients who were not suicidal (69%), had suicidal ideation (71%) or had a history of suicide attempts (70%)
Salomaa et al. 200747	Register linkage study (cause of death register, hospital discharge register, National Prescription Register)	All patients aged 35-74 years hospitalized for the first nonfatal acute coronary syndrome in Finland during 1995-2003 (n=53 353)	Medication persistence at 3 months assessed using National Prescription Register	28% and 15% of the patients did not receive hypolipidemic medications or beta-blockers after coronary syndrome and a further 6% and 10% discontinued these medications 3 months later
Pitkälä et al. 200742	Prospective study among participants in randomised controlled trial	400 cardiovascular patients (>74 years)	Institutionalisation or death at 4.5 year follow-up	Skepticism towards medications (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.11-6.52) and non-adherence (HR 6.24, 95% CI 1.88-20.67) associated with institutionalisation or death at 4.5 year follow-up
Kyngäs et al. 200764	Cross-sectional postal survey using health register as a sampling frame	300 children and adolescents aged 13-17 years with insulin dependent diabetes (97% response rate)	Adherence (including medication adherence) coded as a dichotomous variable	Threat to mental wellbeing OR 7.68 (95% CI 3.95-13.42), support from physicians OR 6.69 (95% CI 3.70-11.46), support from nurses OR 6.28 (95% CI 2.78-16.25) and motivation OR 5.52 (95% CI 3.70-11.46) were factors that significantly predicted adherence
Melartin et al. 200554	Prospective cohort study (Vantaa Depression Study)	269 patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder	Adherence and attitudes toward antidepressants among 198 patients followed for 18 months	88% patients received antidepressants in acute phase, 49% terminated treatment prematurely. Termination was associated with major depressive episodes explained by fear of dependence and antidepressant side-effects
Lahdenperä et al. 200349	Development of a compliance scale using a self-completed patient survey	A convenience sample of 103 patients with hypertension aged 24-65 years from 5 health centres	Principal components analysis of compliance survey	Data supported five subscales labelled lifestyle, intention, attitudes, responsibility and smoking. There was a correlation between medication use and attitudes (r=0.282, p<0.015). However, the two medication-related items were excluded from final scale because 27% of patients did not take medication.
Jokisalo et al. 200344	Cross-sectional mail surveys and health examination of general practice patients	1782 (80%) hypertensive patients from 26 health centres during one week in 1996	Factors associated with poor blood pressure control (BP≥ 140/90 mmHg)	Non-compliance in men was associated with poor blood pressure control. Hopelessness towards hypertension (OR, 2.16; 95% CI 1.20-3.88), medium and high levels of frustration with treatment (OR, 1.50; 95% CI 1.04-2.18 and OR 1.83; 95% CI 0.98-3.44) were associated with poor control. Older age and monotherapy were also associated with poor blood pressure control.
Jokisalo et al. 200245	Cross-sectional mail surveys and health examination of general practice patients	1782 (80%) hypertensive patients from 26 health centres during one week in 1996, of whom 1561 on antihypertensive medication	Self-reported non-compliance with antihypertensive medication (took medication ‘less often than prescribed during the last year’ or ‘modification of dosage instructions’)	Perceived health system-related problems (OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.76-8.26) and patient-related problems (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.79-5.81) associated with self-reported non-compliance. Adverse drug reactions also associated with non-compliance (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.94)
Kampman et al. 200255	Prospective interview study	59 patients with a first-onset psychosis during their initial phase of treatment	Observed compliance during the first 3 months of treatment assessed using patient record data	Determinants of observed non-compliance included harmful side effects, male sex, lack of social activities, low PANSS score for positive symptoms, high PANSS total score and young age. The duration of untreated psychosis was not associated with compliance
Närhi et al. 200221	One-year intervention study in four community pharmacies	31 patients (aged 20-64 years) with perceived problems in asthma management	Perceived problems in asthma self-management at baseline, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months	Of 28 patients who completed the intervention, 17 patients self-reported problems with medications at baseline (including difficulty remembering to take medications, and considering medications unpleasant) compared to 4 patients at the 12-month follow-up
Kneckt et al. 200168	Cross-sectional patient self-completed survey	149 patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus	Adherence to insulin regimen (adjusting injections to meal times and adjusting insulin dose to exercise). Self-esteem was assessed using 8-point scale	64% of patients with diabetes self-reported good adherence to their insulin regimen. High self-esteem was associated with self-reported adherence to insulin regimen (p=0.005)
Kampman et al. 200161	Prospective interview study	100 hospital inpatients and outpatients receiving neuroleptic medication (mean age 37.6 years, age range 16-63 years)	Discrepancy in compliance assessments performed by physicians and patient self-reported compliance	Patient characteristics explaining discrepancy in assessments included mania, high neuroleptic dose, female gender, low education level, and attitudes toward neuroleptic treatment
Jokisalo et al. 200146	Cross-sectional mail surveys and health examination of general practice patients	1782 (80%) hypertensive patients from 26 health centres during one week in 1996, of whom 1561 on antihypertensive medication	14 self-reported problem indices formulated from 82 items about experiences in relation to hypertension treatment	Problems included lack of motivation for follow-up (72%), difficultly accepting being hypertensive (66%), careless attitude towards hypertension (63%), lack of information (56%), and hopelessness, impact on sexual function and lack of support by health care personnel (33%). The least frequent problems included modification of dosage instructions. The number of problems per person ranged from 0-13, mean 4.9
Enlund et al. 200143	Cross-sectional survey of patients of 9 community pharmacies	971 patients aged <75 years receiving long-term treatment with antihypertensive medications between May and September of 1996, of whom 482 (56%) completed the questionnaire	Self-reported self-initiated modification of dosage instructions (often, sometimes, no) with often and sometimes combined to form a dichotomous variable (modifiers and non-modifiers). Self-reported hypertension treatment problems (symptoms of hypertension, adverse drug effects, perceived negative patient role, memory problems, interference with daily routines, had to give up pleasant activities/interference with hobbies)	31% of males and 21% of females self-reported they modified their dosage instructions. Patients with 3+ hypertension treatment problems and those with an academic education were significantly more likely to have modified their dosage instructions than those without problems (OR 4.79, 95% CI 2.36-9.73) and (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.27-5.70)
Lahdenperä & Kyngäs. 200148	Interviews with participants in a compliance intervention comprising a multimedia computer program and lifestyle counselling	21 patients with hypertension aged 16-64 years who had been taking medication for less than one year or not at all	Meaning of compliance to patients with hypertension, and attitude of patients toward their illness (S)	Four levels of compliance detected (subconscious, cognitive, action and attitudinal). Four types of attitudes toward illness detected (careless, serious, well adjusted, frustrated)
Toljamo & Hentinen. 200166	Cross-sectional mail survey	213 people with insulin-treated diabetes aged 17-65 years who visited health centre or hospital (76% response rate)	Adherence to self-care, difficulties in self-care, perceived receipt of social support (S)	10% of respondents reported sometimes, often or always experiencing difficulties with insulin treatment at home, while 43% experienced difficulties when not at home. Insulin therapy was not perceived as the most difficult aspect of self-care. There was an overall relationship between poor self-care and poor metabolic control
Toljamo & Hentinen. 200167	Cross-sectional mail survey	213 people with insulin-treated diabetes aged 17-65 years who visited health centre or hospital (76% response rate)	Adherence to self-care according to prescribed health regimen (S)	84% of respondents accomplished daily insulin injections as scheduled, while a further 15% accomplished near daily insulin injections. Respondents were less adherent to urine testing, exercise and dietary recommendations
Kyngäs. 200162	Cross-sectional postal survey using health register as a sampling frame	1200 children and adolescents with epilepsy, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and asthma	Compliance (including medication compliance) coded as a dichotomous variable (compliant versus non-compliant)	Support from nurses OR 7.28 (95% CI 3.95-13.42), energy and willpower OR 6.69 (95% CI 3.91-11.46) and good motivation OR 5.28 (95% CI 3.02-9.22) were the strongest predictors of compliance
Kyngäs. 200156	Cross-sectional postal survey using health register as a sampling frame	300 children and adolescents with epilepsy aged 13-17 years (77% response rate)	Compliance (including medication compliance) coded as a dichotomous variable (compliant versus non-compliant)	Support from physicians OR 10.56 (95% CI 2.06-15.22), support from parents OR 10.47 (95% CI 2.19-14.77) and motivation OR 9.77 (95% CI 2.47-13.86) were the strongest predictors of compliance
Kyngäs. 200057	Cross-sectional postal survey using health register as a sampling frame	300 children and adolescents with epilepsy aged 13-17 years (77% response rate)	Compliance with health regimens (including medication compliance). Compliance divided into 3 categories; good, satisfactory and poor	37% categorised as having good medication compliance, and 31% poor medication compliance
Kyngäs. 200065	Cross-sectional postal survey using health register as a sampling frame	300 children and adolescents aged 13-17 years with diabetes mellitus (97% response rate)	Compliance with health regimens (including medication compliance). Compliance divided into 3 categories; good, satisfactory and poor	81% of children or adolescents reported good compliance with insulin treatment. 48% of children or adolescents reported their treatment was planned together with physicians. 49% of children or adolescents reported their treatment was planned together with nurses
Kyngäs. 200069	Cross-sectional postal survey using health register as a sampling frame	300 children and adolescents aged 13-17 years with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (91% response rate)	Compliance (including medication compliance) divided into 3 categories; good, satisfactory and poor	3% categorised as having good medication compliance, 52% satisfactory medication compliance and 45% poor medication compliance

Abreviations: OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; PANSS=positive and negative syndrome scale; DSM-IV =Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Version 4); (S)=compliance, adherence or persistence was a secondary outcome measure only.

The terminology used in the table (compliance/adherence/persistence) corresponds to the terminology used by the authors of the above studies

Study designs and data sources

Four papers used the National Prescription Register as the only data source.38-40,59 Two papers combined data from the National Prescription Register with data obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Register and/or Cause of Death Register.47,50 Seven papers combined medication data from the National Prescription Register and data from postal surveys concerning perceived support from physicians, nurses and parents, motivation, sense of coherence, threat to social well-being, fear of acute problems, and energy and will power.41,56,57,62,64,65,69 Six of these papers reported data from 1200 children and adolescents with epilepsy, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or asthma.56,57,62,64,65,69 Three studies utilised qualitative interviews.48,60,63 Only one study was an intervention study conducted in community pharmacies.21

Three papers reported data from the same prospective cohort study (Vantaa Depression Study)53,54,58, and one study used data from the Drugs and Evidence-Based Medicine in the Elderly (DEBATE) RCT.42 One study was an observational study on compliance monitoring51, and another was a retrospective hospital medical record review study.52

Three papers reported data from a health examination and cross-sectional mail survey of general practice patients44-46, and one study was a cross-sectional mail survey of patients of nine community pharmacies.43 Two papers reported data from the same cross-sectional mail survey of people with insulin-treated diabetes.66,67 Two papers described prospective interview studies of patients with first onset psychosis and hospital outpatients receiving neuroleptic medications.55,61 Two further studies reported cross-sectional surveys of patients with diabetes68, and hypertension49, with the latter being for the purpose of developing a compliance scale.

Measurement of adherence

Studies that used the Finnish National Prescription Register or medical records defined adherence according to the proportion of days or time periods covered by dispensed medications.41,50,52,54,61 Persistence was defined according to the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation.38-40,47,59 Of those studies that used a patient self-completed survey to assess adherence none used a validated medication adherence specific scale, for example, the Morisky Scale70, or Medication Adherence Report Scale.71 Instead these studies used items including “I carry out my medical treatment according to the instructions given by my doctor or nurse” and “I do not carry out the medical treatment as instructed because the medicine causes side-effects” to define medication adherence as part of a patient’s overall adherence to a health-care regimen.56,57,62,64,65,69 Other researchers determined patient self-reported medication non-adherence by asking questions including “did you take your medication less often than prescribed by your physician during the past year”, “did you modify dosage instructions during the past year”, “did you accomplish daily insulin injections as scheduled”, or “did you have difficulty remembering to take your medications”.21,43-46,66-68 Four studies reported patient non-adherence categorised by physicians following a patient interview42,53,58,61, with one study comparing physician and patient assessments.61 One study described the development and validation of an instrument to measure adherence.49 Another study reported the use of an electronic adherence monitoring device that used mobile phone technology to record the time each dose was taken.51 Three studies qualitatively examined factors associated with medication adherence and did not provide a quantitative estimate of medication adherence.48,60,63

Professional background of researchers

The first author was affiliated with a school of pharmacy in eight of the 33 research publications.21,43-46,51,59,60 Other publications were co-authored by pharmacists working for the Social Insurance Institution of Finland38,40,59, National Agency for Medicines60, or at a medical school.38-40 The first author was affiliated with a medical school or hospital medical department in 15 publications38-42,47,50-55,58,61,63, and affiliated with a nursing school in 10 publications.48,49,56,57,62,64-67,69 The first author was affiliated with a dental school in one study.68 There were no apparent differences in study design and methodology according to the institutional affiliation of the authors.

Adherence Policy

The MSAH is responsible for policies in relation to social protection, social welfare and health care. In 2003 the Ministry outlined key pharmaceutical policy objectives in a document entitled Pharmaceutical Policy 2010.3 The document stressed the importance of the rational use of medications. Pharmacists were perceived as a potential resource for promoting the rational use of medications. In 2006 the Ministry published a document entitled Safe pharmacotherapy: a national guide for pharmacotherapy in social and health care.72 The document highlighted that one way to improve medication safety is for clinicians to provide information and encourage patient participation in treatment decision making.

The Finnish Medicines Agency (Fimea) (comprising the former National Agency for Medicines) operates under the MSAH. It commenced operations in November 2009 and has duties including research and development, and the production and dissemination of information on medicinal products. An objective of Fimea is to improve the effectiveness of pharmaceutical services and pharmacotherapy. Fimea is also responsible for implementing EU guidelines and regulations, and approving the content of patient information leaflets (required to be included in dispensed packages of medications in the EU). It is expected that Fimea will take a greater role in ensuring the medication users are placed at the centre of pharmaceutical practice and policy development.

The reimbursement system in Finland has partly been responsible for shaping the way that medication counselling services are offered. Pharmacists are permitted to dispense up to three months supply of a reimbursed prescription medication in a single dispensing. Patients are permitted to collect their repeat supply within a two-week window prior to the completion of this three-month period. Pharmacists are required to ensure that patients do not collect their repeat supply early. This means that pharmacists have focused on addressing medication overuse. However, the reimbursement system does not provide similar encouragement for pharmacists to address underuse. The introduction of mandatory generic substitution by pharmacists in 2003 and a reference pricing system in 2009 has also meant that medication counselling is increasingly focused on the cost of medications.73,74

Community pharmacy practice related to adherence

There are no national pharmacy practice programs in Finland that have been specifically developed to monitor or improve medication adherence. However, adherence practice in Finnish pharmacies has been strongly linked to the development of medication counselling services. Finnish pharmacies represent one important setting where strategies to promote medication adherence may be implemented.27 Pharmacists in Finland have had a legal and professional obligation to provide medication counselling since 1983. Prior to 1983 pharmacists were not permitted to provide spontaneous medication counselling. Following this change in law there was extensive debate about whether pharmacist-conducted medication counselling would undermine the physician-patient relationship. This meant that many pharmacists were reluctant to provide counselling about adverse drug reactions for fear this might damage the physician-patient relationship and lead to medication non-adherence. The roles and responsibilities of different health professionals in relation to medication counselling has been extensively researched and discussed since this time.75-77

Finnish pharmacies have a monopoly on the sale of prescription and non-prescription medications (with exception of nicotine-replacement therapy).78 Only pharmacists with a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree are allowed to sell medications and provide therapeutic advice about prescription and nonprescription medications.27 As a result the majority of Finnish pharmacy employees have a degree in pharmacy. Medication counselling initiatives in community pharmacies have included the “Questions to Ask About Your Medicines Campaign”,79 and the Customized Information for the Benefit of Community Pharmacy Patients (TIPPA) Project.80 Research conducted in conjunction with these initiatives revealed that 96% of Finnish pharmacists agreed or strongly agreed that establishing a therapeutic alliance with patients is a high priority.81 However, medication counselling varied according to the therapeutic class of medication, and most commonly related to dosage instructions rather than an in-depth discussion about or monitoring of therapeutic outcomes.82 The use of new technologies, such as email and the Internet, as tools to facilitate medication counselling has been the topic of recent research.60,83

Special programs have been launched to cater to the needs of particular patient groups. Following the launch of the National Asthma Program in 1994, a Pharmacy Asthma Program was launched in 1997.84 The Pharmacy Diabetes Program commenced in 2000 and the Pharmacy Heart Program in 2005.85 Pharmacists are instructed to support medication adherence through provision of medication counselling and work together with other health care professionals to develop local models to achieve optimal treatment outcomes. These programs provide a framework rather than stipulating specific adherence monitoring methods. There is also a dose-dispensing service that may be offered to pharmacy clients at high risk of medication non-adherence.27 A model for comprehensive medication review involving collaboration between pharmacists and physicians has been developed.86 This service may also identify and address medication non-adherence.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

A new asthma service is set to be launched in community pharmacies. This program will be based on previous research that investigated the provision of pharmaceutical care for people with asthma21, and the EuroPharm Forum model.87 A new document entitled Pharmaceutical Policy 2020 is due to be published by the MSAH by the end of 2010. It is expected that non-adherence will be recognised as a major reason for failure to achieve medication treatment goals, and that the importance of empowering patients will be further emphasised. It is likely that the importance of health care professionals adopting a concordant approach as a mechanism to better understand and address nonadherence will be highlighted.

The existence of National Prescription Registers in the Nordic countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Iceland) has facilitated register-based epidemiological research into medication adherence and persistence.18 The Nordic Pharmacoepidemiological Network (NorPEN), a new research consortium involving 11 research institutions in the Nordic countries, has been funded by the Nordic Council of Ministers. The aim of the network is to realise the world-unique possibility to carry out population-based cross-country research in pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. Register-based studies into medication adherence and persistence are one component of this research. This network includes researchers with backgrounds in pharmacy, medicine, epidemiology, statistics and public health. Pharmacists who belong to this network are primarily employed by social insurance institutions, national public health institutes, and research centres focused on ageing and pharmacotherapeutics.

METHODOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS

Only peer-reviewed research articles published in English-language MEDLINE or EMBASE indexed journals from 2000 until present was included in the review of adherence research. Non-English language research on adherence, including master’s and doctoral theses, were not identified in the systematic search and were not considered in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence research in Finland has focused on understanding the contextual factors that contribute to medication non-adherence. Data have been collected using population-based surveys, qualitative interviews and national health registers. Research has been performed by pharmacy, medical, nursing and dental researchers.

Adherence practice in Finnish community pharmacies has been strongly linked to the development of medication counselling services. Medication adherence is a topic that is integrated into courses or bachelor and master level pharmacy students. The MSAH recognises that nonadherence is a major reason for failing to achieve therapeutic goals. The MSAH also recognises the need for clinicians to empower patients.