Abstract
Pulmonary embolism is a life-threatening but treatable condition. Factors such as hypercoagulability and recent lower extremity surgery are associated with a higher incidence of thrombus formation and pulmonary embolism. Patients with sickle cell disease have a baseline hypercoaguable state and are at a greater risk forming deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism than the general population. This increased risk is rarely cited in the literature. We describe a sickle cell patient two-weeks status-post total hip arthroplasty who presented with bilateral pulmonary embolism complaining of chest and shoulder pain. We highlight the need to include pulmonary embolism in the differential diagnosis of all sickle cell patients complaining of chest pain.
Introduction
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal disease that requires prompt diagnosis and early treatment. The incidence of PE in the general population is between 0.023% and 0.205%1 and is even lower in children2. However, the mortality rate can approach 8.65-15.1% in treated patients1,3 and 25-35.5% in untreated patients4,5. Factors associated with an increased risk for PE and its usual precursor, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), include recent total knee or hip arthroplasty6-8, clotting disorders such as sickle cell disease2,9,10, cancer, obesity, decreased mobility, family history of venous thromboembolism11, and African American race1, 10. As this case demonstrates, pulmonary embolism should be considered in the differential diagnosis for any sickle cell patient presenting with an insidious onset of chest or thorax pain, especially in those with other predisposing factors for venous thrombosis.
Case Report
An eighteen-year-old African American male with type SS sickle cell disease was admitted to the pediatric ward of the hospital 14 days status-post total hip arthroplasty (THA). He complained of left-sided chest and shoulder pain that began three days prior to admission. The pain initially started in the region of his left ribs and began radiating to the superior aspect of his left shoulder one day prior to admission. The patient had been discharged from the hospital after his surgery 12 days prior to this admission. Although our institution encourages early mobilization, the patient was not fully ambulatory until about five days prior to the onset of symptoms. The reasons for this delayed mobilization are unclear, although it was likely due to a combination of social factors and general fatigue postoperatively. He described his pain on readmission as sharp, severe, and worse with inspiration. He denied any trauma or recent respiratory infection.
His past medical history was significant for sickle cell disease, bilateral avascular necrosis of his hips, and multiple hospitalizations for vaso-occlusive crises, acute chest syndrome, and priapism. He had been treated prophylactically after surgery (starting 12 hours postoperatively) with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for two days until discharge, although he was not compliant with his outpatient LMWH. His current medications consisted of 1200 mg of hydroxyurea and 1 mg of folic acid daily.
On exam, the patient was afebrile and did not appear to be in respiratory distress, although he exhibited shallow respirations due to pain. He had no tenderness to palpation, ecchymosis, swelling, or erythema in the regions of his pain. His lungs were clear to auscultation bilaterally with diminished breath sounds in his left lower lobe. He had no swelling of his extremities and had a negative Homans sign. His pulse oximeter showed oxygen saturations of 96-98% on room air. All other vital signs and physical exam findings were normal. Chemistry studies were within normal limits except for a Creactive protein of 7.52 mg/L. His hemoglobin was 11.3 g/dL, hematocrit was 34.0%, and his reticulocyte count was 5.1%, all of which were improved from his lab values at discharge two weeks prior to admission. Prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and international normalized ratio (INR) were within normal limits. An AP and lateral chest X-ray did not show any pleural effusions, consolidation, vascular congestion, or other acute abnormalities or interval changes from prior chest X-rays. A PE protocol spiral CT scan (Figure 1) showed bilateral PE, worse on the left side, with a left lower lobe wedge infarct and subsegmental infarcts on the right side. The patient was started on 12,500 units of Fragmin.
Figure 1. Spiral CT showed bilateral PEs.

On hospital day two, the patient had an ultrasound of the bilateral lower extremities, which was negative for deep vein thrombosis. The patient was clinically stable, denied shortness of breath, and complained of continued pain with respirations. His Fragmin was continued and he was started on 4 mg of Coumadin with a goal INR of 2-3. The patient's clinical condition gradually improved, and on hospital day eight he reported no pain with inspiration. His INR was near therapeutic at 1.92. As the patient did not have a strong social support system and had a history of medication noncompliance, we planned to keep him admitted until his INR was therapeutic. However, the patient checked out against medical advice that evening.
Discussion
Venous stasis, turbulent blood flow, and a hypercoaguable state often lead to DVT and PE8. Patients with sickle cell disease exhibit an elevated baseline level of coagulation9,10. Although this multifactorial hypercoagulability is a risk factor for thrombosis formation, DVT and PE are rarely cited as potential complications of sickle cell disease9. Recent studies have demonstrated that patients with sickle cell disease, and even sickle cell trait, are at a higher risk for developing venous thrombosis and subsequent PEs9,10. Since the treatment of a PE can greatly reduce mortality4,5, a high index of suspicion should be maintained in sickle cell patients presenting with chest pain.
When venous stasis occurs, platelets aggregate, often in the valve cusps of lower extremity veins. A clot forms and is neutralized by fibrin. This process is repeated, forming multiple layers of fibrin and clots, ultimately resulting in a venous thrombosis12. Anything that increases coagulability or causes venous stasis will increase the rate of DVT and PE. Factors associated with thrombosis and embolism in children include cancer, trauma, congestive heart disease, infection, lupus, liver failure, and sickle cell disease2. Additional risk factors are prolonged bed rest3,12, Factor V Leiden1, smoking, increased blood viscosity12, hip fracture, pelvis fracture, and recent lower extremity orthopaedic surgery8.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most common surgeries associated with venous thrombosis8,12, with DVT forming in up to 70% of patients with no prophylaxis7. The pathophysiology of thrombus formation after a THA is partially due to endothelial injury. This can occur via kinking of the femoral vein during manipulation of the leg or through direct vascular injury, releasing clotting factors from the endothelium8. In addition, venous stasis may occur as a result of immobilization after surgery or swelling in the affected leg, and coagulability may be increased by thromboplastin release from the femoral canal8. Sickle cell patients often undergo THA due to osteonecrosis of the hip13,14, and they are at an increased risk of thrombotic complications due to their hypercoaguable state9,10.
A thrombus that breaks off and enters the pulmonary vasculature becomes a PE, and is a potentially fatal condition3,7,8,12. Historically, up to 35.5% of untreated patients with PE died4, and two thirds did so within the first thirty minutes6. However, early diagnosis and proper treatment can reduce the mortality rate substantially4-6,12,15. Recent studies have shown that the current all cause fatality rate for hospitalized patients with PE is as low as 7.4%21 and death from PE to be less than 1%17,18. Over 50% of fatal PE's after THA occur in the second postoperative week and over 20% occur in the third postoperative week.
The median time to symptomatic DVT occurs at 17 days postoperatively6. Dyspnea, tachypnea, tachycardia, and pleuritic pain are often seen at presentation8,12. Common modalities used in diagnosis include pulmonary angiography8,12,15,21, nuclear medicine ventilation-perfusion scan8,12,15, spiral CT scan8,12,15,21, and D-dimer levels15,21.Doppler venous ultrasound and testing for the presence of Homans sign can be useful in detecting DVT12, and high pretest probability and positive physical examination findings increase the sensitivity of these tests12,15,21.
The prevalence of PE is higher for hospitalized sickle cell patients compared to similar non-sickle cell patients9, and is likely under-diagnosed19. The symptoms associated with PE are often mistaken for another pulmonary condition common in sickle cell disease, acute chest syndrome (ACS). ACS is a leading cause of death in sickle cell disease and manifests as a variety of respiratory symptoms including pulmonary infiltrates, chest pain, tachypnea, hypoxia, fever, and pulmonary hyper-tension20. As Stein et al. describe, ACS often leads to vascular occlusion and pulmonary infarction, likely due to thrombosis in situ16. While PE affects elastic vessels >1mm in diameter, thrombosis in situ affects the smaller muscular arterioles. This difference can be detected with standard or CT pulmonary angiography9. PE is not thought to be a cause of ACS, although some studies show that 17% of patients with ACS go on to develop PE19. Treatment for ACS and PE differ, and anticoagulation is not used therapeutically in ACS. Any patient with sickle cell disease who does not improve with standard ACS treatment modalities should be evaluated for PE.
Although the literature is sparse regarding prophylaxis and treatment of PE in sickle cell patients after THA, the traditional management of symptomatic DVT or PE consists of anticoagulants and supportive therapy4,5,8,12. Intravenous heparin was formerly the mainstay of treatment4,5,8, but low-molecular-weight heparins are increasingly being used8. Both have been shown to substantially reduce the incidence of thrombosis7,12. Either of these therapies should be transitioned to long-term warfarin treatment, usually for three to six months8. Intravenous or low-molecular weight heparin should be discontinued after the INR level is 2.0-2.5 for two days6,8.
Conclusion
Patients with sickle cell disease exhibit a baseline hypercoaguable state and are at an increased risk for venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism9,10. This association is rarely listed in the literature. Orthopaedic surgeries commonly performed on sickle cell patients13, 12 can significantly increase the risk of thrombus formation8,12,14. Our case report demonstrates the need for a high index of suspicion in sickle cell patients presenting with pleuritic chest pain.
References
- 1.White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107:14–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078468.11849.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.David M, Andrew M. Venous thromboembolic complications in children. J Pediatr. 1993;123:337–346. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81730-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Laporte S, Mismetti P, Decousus H, et al. Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15,520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry. Circulation. 2008;117:1711–1716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.726232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hermann RE, Davis JH, Holden WD. Pulmonary embolism. A clinical and pathologic study with emphasis on the effect of prophylactic therapy with anticoagulants. American journal of surgery. 1961;102:19. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(61)90680-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barritt DW, Jordan SC. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. A controlled trial. Lancet. 1960;1:1309. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(60)92299-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harkess JW, Crockarell JR. General principles of arthroscopy. In: Canale TS, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007. pp. 394–396. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS. Incidence and natural history of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume. 2003;85:661–665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Buckwalter JA, Einhorn TA, O'Keefe RJ. Orthopaedic basic science : foundations of clinical practice. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2007. Thromboembolism and pulmonary distress in the setting of orthopaedic surgery. pp. 105–113. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stein PD, Beemath A, Meyers FA, Skaf E, Olson RE. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients with sickle cell disease. Am J Med. 2006;119:897.e7–897.11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Austin H, Key NS, Benson JM, et al. Sickle cell trait and the risk of venous thromboembolism among blacks. Blood. 2007;110:908–912. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-057604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mont MA, Jacobs JJ, Boggio LN, Bozic KJ, Della Valle CJ, Goodman SB, … Aaos. Preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(12):768–776. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201112000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miller MD, Hart JA. Basic sciences. In: Brinker MR, O'Connor DP, editors. Review of orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders / Elsevier; 2008. pp. 94–97. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Al-Mousawi F, Malki A, Al-Aradi A, Al-Bagali M, Al-Sadadi A, Booz MM. Total hip replacement in sickle cell disease. Int Orthop. 2002;26:157–161. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0337-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hernigou P, Zilber S, Filippini P, Mathieu G, Poignard A, Galacteros F. Total THA in adult osteonecrosis related to sickle cell disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:300–308. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0069-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rodger MA, Bredeson CN, Jones G, et al. The bedside investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis study: a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing combinations of 3 bedside tests vs ventilation-perfusion scan for the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:181–187. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.2.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stein PD, Matta F, Alrifai A, Rahman A. Trends in case fatality rate in pulmonary embolism according to stability and treatment. Thromb Res. 2012;130(6):841–846. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.07.011. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Agnelli G, Becattini C. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(3):266–274. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0907731. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0907731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lachiewicz PF. Prevention of symptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: clinical guideline of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:795–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Novelli EM, Huynh C, Gladwin MT, Moore CG, Ragni MV. Pulmonary embolism in sickle cell disease: a case-control study. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(5):760–766. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04697.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04697.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ballas SK, Kesen MR, Goldberg MF, Lutty GA, Dampier C, Osunkwo I, … Malik P. Beyond the definitions of the phenotypic complications of sickle cell disease: an update on management. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012 doi: 10.1100/2012/949535. 2012, 949535. doi: 10.1100/2012/949535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295:172–179. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
