Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2014 Aug 6;55(32):4463–4465. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.06.083

Tetrasubstituted pyrazinones derived from the reaction of praziquantel with N-bromosuccinimide

Qingjie Zhao a, Chunkai Wang a, Edward L Ezell b, Yuxiang Dong a, Jonathan L Vennerstrom a,*
PMCID: PMC4128413  NIHMSID: NIHMS610279  PMID: 25125709

Abstract

When praziquantel was exposed to N-bromosuccinimide in the presence of ethanol, a tricyclic 3-bromo-1-ethoxy pyrazinone was formed. From this and the analogous 1,3-dibromopyrazinone, a small library of 3-alkylamino-1-ethoxy, 1,3-dialkoxy, 3-alkoxy-1-bromo, and 3-alkylamino-1-bromo substituted pyrazinones were synthesized in high yields.

Keywords: praziquantel, N-bromosuccinimide, pyrazinone, piperazinone


Praziquantel (1) is the drug of choice for schistosomiasis.1,2 One of the few liabilities of 1 is its rapid first-pass drug metabolism24 to form a number of metabolites, including the major trans-cyclohexanol metabolite 25,6 that is reported to be equal to or considerably less effective than the parent drug (Figure 1).79 As 1 is so rapidly metabolized, it is reasonable to assume that other yet to be identified metabolites might also contribute to its antischistosomal activity. In this respect, structures for these putative metabolites have not been confirmed, but biomimetic oxidation10 and human pharmacokinetic and CYP450 studies3,11,12 have identified two to seven monohydroxy, four dihydroxy, one trihydroxy, and one to two dehydrogenated metabolites; the latter may have arisen by dehydration reactions of monohydroxy metabolites. Interestingly, 3, the gem-difluoro analog of 1, is only marginally more metabolically stable than the latter, but it has lower antischistosomal activity; however, unlike 1, 3 has activity against the juvenile stage of this parasite.13 In sum, these data suggest that further studies to sort out the metabolic ambiguities of 1 might lead to new insights into its mechanism of action and provide new directions for drug discovery. We now report the outcome of our initial experiments to access the yet to be identified metabolites of 1 via bromination reactions using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

When we exposed 1 to NBS in chloroform solvent, a proton NMR of the crude reaction mixture indicated formation of a product with an ethoxy substructure. We surmised that the 0.75% EtOH in the chloroform had participated at some point in the reaction sequence. We then ran a reaction with a 1:3:2 molar ratio of 1:NBS:EtOH in dichloromethane and isolated pyrazinone 6 (3-bromo-1-ethoxy-6,7-dihydro-4H-pyrazino[2,1-a]isoquinolin-4-one) in 38% yield (Scheme 1). We also observed concomitant formation of 7, the ethyl ester of cyclohexane carboxylic acid, with GC-MS and in NMR spectra. Attempts to improve the yield of 6 by running the reaction in pure EtOH or by replacing the dichloromethane cosolvent with acetonitrile were unsuccessful.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: (a) NBS, EtOH, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h; (b) NBS, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h.

We propose that 6 arose from an initial α-bromination of 1 to form intermediate 4 (Scheme 1), a reaction that has precedent to α-brominations of structurally related 2,5-diketopiperazines with NBS.14 This was followed by attack of EtOH on the exocyclic amide of 4 or its corresponding acyliminium ion intermediate15 to form conjugated imine 5. We surmised that the conversion of 1 to 4 was reversible since 1 was inert to NBS in dichloromethane solvent (without EtOH). Evidently, further bromination-dehydrobromination reactions must have ensued to account for the formation of 6. However, followup experiments showed that neither pyrazinones 8 nor 10 were reaction intermediates in this sequence, as no 6 was formed from treatment of either compound with a mixture of NBS and EtOH in dichloromethane. Pyrazinone 8 was synthesized independently by treatment of 1 with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ),16 and 10 was synthesized in 32% yield by reaction of piperazinone 913 with NBS.

1D and 2D NMR data for 6 identified this reaction product as a tricyclic pyrazinone, but the weak NOE correlations for the ethoxy substructure did not distinguish between the assigned 3-bromo-1-ethoxy (6) and alternate 1-bromo-3-ethoxy (14) regioisomers (Figure 2). As described below in Scheme 2, pyrazinone 14 was synthesized independently from 10, and its melting point and NMR spectra differed from that of 6. However, definitive assignment of the structure of pyrazinone 6 was possible only by key HMBC correlations and ROESY NOE’s in the 2D NMR data of its derivative 17 (Figure 2), obtained as described below in Scheme 2. These included HMBC correlations from the CH2 hydrogen atoms α to the NH to C-3, from the NH and 6-CH2 hydrogen atoms to C-4, and from the OCH2 hydrogens on the C-1 ethoxy substructure to C-1. ROESY NOE’s from H-11 to H-10 and to both sets of hydrogens of the C-1 ethoxy substituent clinched the regioisomer assignment.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: (a) RONa, ROH, rt, 12 h; (b) R1R2NH, THF, rt, 12 h; (c) H2, Ni, aq. NaOH, MeOH/THF, rt, 24 h.

Clearly, bromination of 1 with NBS was not going to provide a path forward to access metabolites of 1, all of which contain its cyclohexanecarboxamide substructure. Nonetheless, we decided to investigate the chemistry of 6 and 10 with the aim of accessing novel fully substituted pyrazinones (Scheme 2). First, we found that 6 could be easily converted to 1,3-dialkoxy pyrazinones 11 and 12 by treatment with the corresponding alkoxide/alcohol combinations. However, 6 did not react with the t-butyl alkoxide/t-butyl alcohol combination. Similarly, reaction of 6 with a variety of primary and secondary amines afforded the 3-alkylamino-1-ethoxy pyrazinones 15–20 in yields > 80%. These reactions are similar to those described for other 3-bromo- and 3-chloropyrazinonones.17,18 A parallel set of reactions with 1,3-dibromopyrazinone 10 (Scheme 2) led to reaction products with substitution occurring exclusively at the imidoyl bromide (position 3). These are exemplified by 3-alkoxy-1-bromo pyrazinones 13 and 14 and 3-alkylamino-1-bromo pyrazinones 21–26 which were all produced in high yields. Interestingly, other dibromopyrazinones react with anilines under acidic (camphorsulfonic acid) conditions with the same regioselectivity.19 Finally, pyrazinone 27 was obtained in 80% yield by reductive debromination of 24 with hydrogen and a nickel catalyst. For all of these pyrazinone syntheses, the reaction products were isolated by simple precipitation.

In summary, we synthesized a small library of fully substituted pyrazinones20 that may have some application in drug discovery. For 15–27, predicted21 Log P values ranging from 1.2 to 3.2 and calculated22 polar surface area (PSA) values ranging from 36 to 74 Å indicate that these pyrazinones have physicochemical profiles favorable for compound optimization. We note that the pyrazinone heterocycle appears to be quite chemically and metabolically stable, and that structurally diverse 3-aminopyrazinones possess a variety of of biological activities.1719 In this respect, we tested 15–27 for cytotoxicity and for activity against a panel of protozoan parasites including Trypanosoma cruzi, Leishmania donovani, Plasmodium falciparum, and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. None of the pyrazinones had notable activity against T. b. rhodesiense (IC50s >70 μM) or T. cruzi (IC50s >23 μM). However, representative data (Table) showed that 19, with an IC50 value of 1.7 μM against L. donovani, was only 5-fold less potent than the control drug miltefosine against this protozoan parasite. Pyrazinone 19 had minimal activity against the other protozoan parasites, and it had low cytotoxicity (IC50 160 μM). Similarly, 23 had single digit micromolar activity against P. falciparum, and it also had low cytotoxicity.

Table.

Antiprotozoal activity and selectivity of selected pyrazinones.

IC50 (μM)
Compound L. donovania P. falciparumb cytotoxicityc
12 130 55 68
18 150 78 250
19 1.7 74 160
23 18 6.6 140
Miltefosine 0.34 ND ND
Chloroquine ND 0.15 ND
Podophyllotoxin ND ND 0.0072
a

MHOM-ET-67/L82 strain

b

K1 strain

c

rat skeletal myoblast L6 cell line

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

This investigation received financial support from the NIH (1R21AI076783-01A1). We thank the Nebraska Research Initiative for funds to purchase a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. We acknowledge Marcel Kaiser of the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute for generation of the antiprotozoal data.

Footnotes

Supplementary data

Supplementary data (compound preparation and characterization) data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and Notes

  • 1.Caffrey CR. Curr Opinion Chem Biol. 2007;11:433. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olliaro P, Delgado-Romero P, Keiser J. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:863. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bühring KU, Diekmann HW, Muller H, Garbe A, Nowak H. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1978;3:179. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cioli D, Pica-Mattoccia L, Archer S. Pharmac Ther. 1995;68:35. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(95)00026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kiec-Kononowicz K, Farghaly ZS, Blaschke G. Archiv der Pharmazie. 1991;324:235. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Andrews P. Pharmac Ther. 1985;29:129. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(85)90020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Staudt U, Schmahl G, Blaschke G, Mehlhorn H. Parasitol Res. 1992;78:392. doi: 10.1007/BF00931694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ronketti F, Ramana AV, Chao-Ming X, Pica-Mattoccia L, Cioli D, Todd MH. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:4154. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xiao SH, You JQ, Guo HF, Catto BA. J Parasitol. 1991;77:241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Melo AJB, Iamamoto Y, Maestrin APJ, Smith JRL, Santos MD, Lopes NP, Bonato PS. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 2005;226:23. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang J, Bathena SP, Alnouti Y. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2010;25:487. doi: 10.2133/dmpk.dmpk-10-rg-041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Godawska-Matysik A, Kiec-Kononowicz K. Acta Pol Pharm. 2006;63:381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dong Y, Chollet J, Vargas M, Mansour NR, Bickle Q, Alnouti Y, Huang J, Keiser J, Vennerstrom JL. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:2481. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kishi Y, Nakatsuka S, Fukuyama T, Havel M. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:6493. doi: 10.1021/ja00800a079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jin S, Wessig P, Liebscher J. Eur J Org Chem. 2000:1993–1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kiec-Kononowicz K. Archiv der Pharm. 1989;322:795. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lu T, Markotan T, Ballentine SK, Giardino EC, Spurlino J, Crysler CS, Brown K, Maryanoff BE, Tomczuk BE, Damiano BP, Shukla U, End D, Andrade-Gordon P, Bone RF, Player MR. J Med Chem. 2010;53:1843. doi: 10.1021/jm901802n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sanderson Philip EJ, Lyle Terry A, Cutrona Kellie J, Dyer Dona L, Dorsey Bruce D, McDonough Colleen M, Naylor-Olsen Adel M, Chen I-Wu, Chen Zhongguo, Cook Jacquelynn J, Cooper Carolyn M, Gardell Stephen J, Hare Timothy R, Krueger Julie A, Lewis S Dale, Lin Jiunn H, Lucas Bobby J, Jr, Lyle Elizabeth A, Lynch Joseph J, Stranieri Maria T, Vastag Kari, Yan Youwei, Shafer Jules A, Vacca Joseph P. J Med Chem. 1998;41:4466. doi: 10.1021/jm980368v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heeres J, de Jonge MR, Koymans LM, Daeyaert FF, Vinkers M, Van Aken KJ, Arnold E, Das K, Kilonda A, Hoornaert GJ, Compernolle F, Cegla M, Azzam RA, Andries K, de Béthune MP, Azijn H, Pauwels R, Lewi PJ, Janssen PA. J Med Chem. 2005;48:1910. doi: 10.1021/jm040829e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz spectrometer in CDCl3 solvent. All chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) and are relative to internal (CH3)4Si (0 ppm) for 1H, and CDCl3 (77.0 ppm) for 13C NMR. Combustion analysis confirmed that all target compounds possessed purities ≥ 95%. Melting points are uncorrected.
  • 21.Tetko IV, Gasteiger J, Todeschini R, Mauri A, Livingstone D, Ertl P, Palyulin VA, Radchenko EV, Zefirov NS, Makarenko AS, Tanchuk VY, Prokopenko VV. J Comput Aid Mol Des. 2005;19:453. doi: 10.1007/s10822-005-8694-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Palm K, Stenberg P, Luthman K, Artursson P. Pharm Res. 1997;14:568. doi: 10.1023/a:1012188625088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES