Abstract
An array of N-tosylated α-aminoalkylallenic esters was prepared and their cyclization under the influence of nucleophilic phosphine catalysts was explored. The α-aminoalkylallenic esters were prepared through aza-Baylis–Hillman reactions or novel DABCO-mediated decarboxylative rearrangements of allenylic carbamates. Conversion of these substrates to 3-carbethoxy-2-alkyl-3-pyrrolines was facilitated through Ph3P-catalyzed intramolecular γ-umpolung addition.
Nitrogen-containing heterocycles are ubiquitous structural elements in the realm of natural products and pharmaceutically relevant compounds.1 Amongst these important scaffolds, 3-pyrrolines occupy a uniquely versatile position in that they can be further transformed into their fully saturated pyrrolidines or more highly oxidized pyrrole and pyrrolidinone counterparts.2 Of the various approaches toward functionalized 2,5-dihydropyrroles, Lu’s phosphine-catalyzed [3+2] annulation of allenes and imines has emerged as one of the premiere methodologies.2b,3 Since its first report, this annulation has undergone many developments, including modifications,4 applications,5 and asymmetric renditions.6 Despite the great utility of this phosphine-catalyzed allene–imine [3+2] annulation, it has its limitations—the most evident being the necessity for imines devoid of α-protons. This prerequisite has limited the scope of the reaction to the use of aryl-substituted imines. Overcoming this limitation would expand the potential use of organocatalyzed 3-pyrroline synthesis to applications requiring non-aryl groups substituted onto the heterocycle.7 The successful implementation of alkyl-substituted N-sulfonyl imines was reported only recently: used in conjunction with a Me3P-catalyzed isomerization of 3-alkynoates or when using diphenylphosphinoyl imines along with a highly nucleophilic peptide-based chiral phosphine.8,9 The utility of the resultant 3-pyrrolines was demonstrated in the formal syntheses of (±)-allosecurenine and (+)-trachelanthamidine, respectively.8,9 The development of new methods for forming these types of heterocycles would be a boon to the synthetic community.
The propensity for 2,3-butadienoates and 2-butynoates to undergo nucleophilic attack at their γ-carbon atom is well documented in the literature; it has been employed in the formation of carbon–carbon, carbon–oxygen, carbon–nitrogen, and carbon–sulfur bonds.10 Of particular value to our discussion are intramolecular examples of this reactivity; for example, in which a hydroxyl group tethered via the γ-carbon atom of an activated alkyne can undergo 5- or 6-exo cyclization to yield a number of different oxygen-containing heterocycles (e.g., substituted tetrahydrofurans, dihydrobenzopyrans, and 1,3-oxazines).10b,i Stemming from our interest in using nucleophilic phosphine catalysts to activate allenoates and butynoates, in this study we explored the reactivity of electron-deficient allenes bearing a tethered nitrogen-centered nucleophile with the aim of facilitating intramolecular γ-umpolung additions to yield 2-alkylsubstituted-3-pyrrolines (Scheme 1).11 To the best of our knowledge, there are no previously reported examples of this type of addition occurring via 5-endo cyclization.
Scheme 1.
Phosphine-catalyzed intramolecular γ-umpolung addition.
To test the proposed cycloisomerization, we required a method for synthesizing the necessary α-aminoalkylallenoates. For this purpose, we turned to a known tertiary amine-catalyzed rearrangement of allylic N-tosyl carbamates and tested it on the similar, but never before utilized, allenylic-N-tosyl carbamates 3.12,13 We were pleased to discover that treatment of the allenylic carbamates with a nucleophilic catalyst facilitated the desired rearrangement. The reaction was best facilitated by slowly adding the allenylic carbamate to a solution of one equivalent of DABCO (Table 1).13 Interestingly, we isolated the allenoate 1a in the highest yield (56%) when using dimethyl sulfide as the catalyst in MeCN.14 Dimethyl sulfide failed to provide any desired rearrangement products from any of our other tested substrates. The DABCO-mediated reaction was tolerant of various alkyl groups, providing the desired products in modest yields. The best result was realized when a methyl substituent was present, providing the desired allenoate 1b in 65% yield (entry 2). Extending the chain decreased the efficiency (entries 3 and 4). The reaction also proceeded smoothly when bulkier substituents, namely isopropyl and cycloalkyl groups, were present, albeit in slightly lower yields (entries 5–8). Notably, when an aryl substituent was present, the reaction yielded none of the desired product (entry 9); we could, however, synthesize those allenoates 1 featuring an aryl group as the R unit through aza-Baylis–Hillman reactions between ethyl 2,3-butadienoate and aryl imines.13,15
Table 1.
Decarboxylative rearrangements of allenylic N-tosyl carbamates
![]() | |||
---|---|---|---|
Entry | R | Product | Yielda (%) |
1 | H | 1a | 56b |
2 | methyl | 1b | 65 |
3 | ethyl | 1c | 56 |
4 | n-pentyl | 1d | 27 |
5 | i-propyl | 1e | 52 |
6 | cyclopropyl | 1f | 45 |
7 | cyclopentyl | 1g | 45 |
8 | cyclohexyl | 1h | 51 |
9 | phenyl | 1i | 0 |
Isolated yield after column chromatography.
Dimethyl sulfide was used as the catalyst with MeCN as the solvent.
With the requisite α-aminoalkylallenic esters in hand, we explored their reactivity under nucleophilic catalysis (Table 2). We were pleased to find that addition of 20 mol% of Ph3P to the allenoate 1i in CH2Cl2 at room temperature provided the dihydropyrrole 2i in 62% yield (entry 1). Screening of various solvents (entries 1–5) revealed that benzene was the most efficient reaction medium in terms of the product yield and reaction time, providing the dihydropyrrole in 93% isolated yield after 18 h (entry 5). Use of the more-nucleophilic n-Bu3P markedly decreased the reaction time, but led to a dramatic loss in product yield (entry 6). Next, we extended the reaction to β′-alkyl–substituted α-aminoalkylallenic esters in an attempt to access 2-alkyl–substituted dihydropyrroles. In a very gratifying initial trial, we transformed the ethyl-substituted allenic ester into the desired 2,5-dihydropyrrole in 92% yield (entry 7). In salient contrast to the reaction of the phenyl-substituted derivative 1i, the β′-ethyl–substituted allenic ester 1c required a significantly prolonged reaction time (52 h, cf. 18 h). Increasing the steric bulk of the alkyl group generally decreased the yield and increased the reaction time. The substrate bearing a cyclopentyl group required a reaction for 10 days at 40 °C to reach completion, resulting in an isolated yield of only 44% for the desired pyrroline (entry 8). We made several efforts to minimize the reaction time and improve the yields of the alkyl-substituted substrates. Based on reports of added Brønsted acid/base pairs increasing reaction efficiencies for various phosphine-catalyzed reactions, we screened several additives for their effects. To our delight, the addition of sodium acetate and acetic acid (0.5 equivalents each) shortened the reaction times and generally improved the yields (entries 9 and 10).11o,16
Table 2.
Optimization of the phosphine-catalyzed cycloisomerization
![]() | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | R | Solvent | Additives | Time | Product | Yielda (%) |
1 | Ph | CH2Cl2 | none | 40 h | 2i | 62 |
2 | Ph | PhMe | none | 40 h | 2i | 89 |
3 | Ph | THF | none | 40 h | 2i | 0b |
4 | Ph | MeCN | none | 40 h | 2i | 0 |
5 | Ph | PhH | none | 18 h | 2i | 93 |
6c | Ph | PhH | none | 1 h | 2i | 29 |
7 | Et | PhH | none | 52 h | 2c | 92 |
8 | Cyp | PhH | none | 10 days | 1g | 44 |
9 | Et | PhH | AcOH/NaOAc | 32 h | 2c | 97 |
10 | Cyp | PhH | AcOH/NaOAc | 4 days | 1g | 85 |
Isolated yield after silica gel chromatography.
Recovered starting material.
Bu3P was used
Under the optimized conditions, we converted a number of β′-alkyl– and β′-aryl–substituted α-aminoalkylallenic esters 1 to their corresponding dihydropyrroles 2 (Table 3). The yields for these cycloisomerizations were generally very high. The allenoates 1a and 1j underwent cyclizations in higher yields in the absence of any additives (entries 1 and 10). All of the other alkyl-substituted allenoates benefited from the combination of catalytic Ph3P and Brønsted acid/base, cyclizing in moderate to excellent yields. The allenoates bearing short straight-chain alkyl units, namely methyl and ethyl groups, cyclized in 99 and 97% yields, respectively (entries 2 and 3). The presence of a longer n-pentyl group resulted in lower reaction efficiency, with the allenoate cyclizing in 69% yield (entry 4). Branched alkyl groups were also tolerated well, with the isopropyl-,cyclopropyl-, cyclopentyl-, and cyclohexyl-substituted allenoates cyclizing in 97, 95, 85, and 93% yields, respectively (entries 5–8). Aryl-substituted α-aminoalkylallenic esters also cyclized in high yields (entries 9–12), with themore-electronegative 4-chlorophenyl– and 4-cyanophenyl–substituted allenoates resulting in slightly diminished product yields of 88 and 85%, respectively (entries 10 and 12) relative to the more-electron-rich phenyl-and 4-methoxyphenyl–substituted allenoates, which both cyclized in 99% yields (entries 9 and 11).
Table 3.
Phosphine-catalyzed intramolecular γ-umpolung additions
![]() | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | R | Time (h) | Product | Yield (%) |
1 | H | 18 | 2a | 87a |
2 | Me | 19 | 2b | 99 |
3 | Et | 32 | 2c | 97 |
4 | n-Pent | 48 | 2d | 69 |
5 | i-Pr | 77 | 2e | 97 |
6 | cyclopropyl | 72 | 2f | 95 |
7 | cyclopentyl | 96 | 2g | 85 |
8 | cyclohexyl | 96 | 2h | 93b |
9 | phenyl | 12 | 2i | 99 |
10 | 4-chlorophenyl | 4.5 | 2j | 88a |
11 | 4-methoxyphenyl | 22 | 2k | 99 |
12 | 4-cyanophenyl | 2 | 2l | 85 |
Yield in the absence of any additives.
Based on recovered starting material (69% isolated yield).
Fig. 1 displays our proposed mechanism for the cycloisomerization. Addition of Ph3P to the α-aminoalkylallenic ester 1 leads to the formation of the phosphonium dienolate 4. Conversion to the sulfonamide anion 5 via proton transfer, followed by 5-endo cyclization, yields the phosphorous ylide 6. The well-established equilibration between 6 and 7, followed by β-elimination of the phosphine catalyst, furnishes the final product 2.
Figure 1.
Mechanism for the intramolecular γ-umpolung addition.
In conclusion, we have developed a method for the high-yield formation of 3-carbethoxy-2-alkyl-3-pyrrolines by way of phosphine-catalyzed cycloisomerizations of α-aminoalkylallenic esters. The necessary substrates can be prepared in moderate yields: for aryl-substituted allenoic esters, through aza-Baylis–Hillman reactions; for alkyl-substituted allenoic esters, through novel decarboxylative rearrangements of allenylic carbamates catalyzed by a tertiary amine. This paper illustrates the first example of a 5-endo cyclization occurring via intramolecular γ-umpolung addition to an activated allene.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the NIH (R01GM071779, P41GM081282).
Footnotes
This article is part of the joint ChemComm–Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry ‘Organocatalysis’ web themed issue.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details and NMR spectra of new compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c2cc31347b
Notes and references
- 1.Nitrogen-containing heterocycles are present in six of the ten best-selling pharmaceuticals of 2009 (as ranked by worldwide sales): Lipitor®(Pfizer), Zyprexa®(Lilly), Crestor®(AstraZeneca), Seroquel®(AstraZeneca), Nexium®(AstraZeneca), and Plavix® (Bristol–Meyers Squibb). See: Mack DJ, Brichacek M, Plichta A, Njardarson JT. [(accessed in February 2011)];Top 200 Pharmaceutical Products by Worldwide Sales in 2009. http://cbc.arizona.edu/njardarson/group/top-pharmaceuticals-poster.
- 2.(a) Huwe CM, Blechert S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:7099. [Google Scholar]; (b) Xu Z, Lu X. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:5031. [Google Scholar]; (c) Green MP, Prodger JC, Hayes CJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:6609. [Google Scholar]; (d) Sun W, Ma X, Hong L, Wang R. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:7826. doi: 10.1021/jo2011522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Xu Z, Lu X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:3461. [Google Scholar]; (b) Xu Z, Lu X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:549. [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Zhu X, Henry CE, Kwon O. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:6276. [Google Scholar]; (b) Andrews IP, Kwon O. Org. Syn. 2011;88:138. [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhao G, Shi M. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:9975. doi: 10.1021/jo051763d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zheng S, Lu X. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4481. doi: 10.1021/ol801661y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Castellano S, Fiji HDG, Kinderman SS, Watanabe M, De Leon P, Tamanoi F, Kwon O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:5843. doi: 10.1021/ja070274n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Watanabe M, Fiji HDG, Guo L, Chan L, Kinderman SS, Slamon DJ, Kwon O, Tamanoi F. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:9571. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706229200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lu J, Chan L, Fiji HDG, Dahl R, Kwon O, Tamanoi F. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009;8:1218. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wang Z, Castellano S, Kinderman SS, Argueta CE, Beshir AB, Fenteany G, Kwon O. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:649. doi: 10.1002/chem.201002195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Cruz D, Wang Z, Kibbie J, Modlin R, Kwon O. Proc. Nattl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A. 2011;108:6769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015254108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Du Y, Lu X. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:6463. doi: 10.1021/jo034281f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Pham TQ, Pyne SG, Skelton BW, White AH. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:6369. doi: 10.1021/jo050827h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Jean L, Marinetti A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2141. [Google Scholar]; (b) Scherer A, Gladysz JA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:6335. [Google Scholar]; (c) Bregeot NF, Jean L, Retailleau P, Marinetti A. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:11920. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fang Y, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:5660. doi: 10.1021/ja801344w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zheng S, Lu X. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4481. doi: 10.1021/ol801661y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Pinto N, Bregeot NF, Marinetti A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:146. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liddell JR. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002;19:773. doi: 10.1039/b108975g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sampath M, Lee P-YB, Loh T-P. Chem. Sci. 2011;2:1988. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Han X, Zhong F, Wang Y, Lu Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:767. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Albeit not in a catalytic form, Cristau demonstrated the first γ-umpolung additions to activated allenes; see: Cristau H-J, Viala J, Christol H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982;23:1569. For reactions catalytic in tertiary phosphine, see: Trost B, Li C-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:10819. Lu X, Zhang C. Synlett. 1995;6:645. Chen Z, Zhu G, Jiang Q, Xiao D, Cao P, Zhang X. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:5631. doi: 10.1021/jo9623548. Alvarez-Iberra C, Csaky A, Gomez de la Oliva C. J. Org. Chem. 2000;65:3544. doi: 10.1021/jo9918192. Lu C, Lu X. Org. Lett. 2002;4:4677. doi: 10.1021/ol0270733. Pakulski Z, Demchuk OM, Frelek J, Luboradzki R, Pietrusiewicz KM. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:3913. Virieux D, Guillouzic A-F, Cristau H-J. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:3710. Chung YK, Fu GC. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48:2225. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805377. Guan X-Y, Wei Y, Shi M. Org. Lett. 2010;12:5024. doi: 10.1021/ol102191p. Zhang Q, Yang L, Tong X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:2550. doi: 10.1021/ja100432m. Smith SW, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:14231. doi: 10.1021/ja9061823.
- 11.(a) Zhu X-F, Lan J, Kwon O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:4716. doi: 10.1021/ja0344009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhu X-F, Henry CE, Kwon O. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:6276. [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhu X-F, Henry CE, Wang J, Dudding T, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1387. doi: 10.1021/ol050203y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhu X-F, Schaffner A, Li RC, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2005;7:2977. doi: 10.1021/ol050946j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Tran YS, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2005;7:4289. doi: 10.1021/ol051799s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Dudding T, Kwon O, Mercier E. Org. Lett. 2006;8:3643. doi: 10.1021/ol061095y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Mercier E, Fonovic B, Henry C, Kwon O, Dudding T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:3617. [Google Scholar]; (h) Zhu X-F, Henry CE, Kwon O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:6722. doi: 10.1021/ja071990s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Henry CE, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2007;9:3069. doi: 10.1021/ol071181d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Tran YS, Kwon O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:12632. doi: 10.1021/ja0752181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Sriramurthy V, Barcan GA, Kwon O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:12928. doi: 10.1021/ja073754n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Creech GS, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2008;10:429. doi: 10.1021/ol702462w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Creech GS, Zhu X, Fonovic B, Travis D, Kwon O. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:6935. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.04.075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Guo H, Xu Q, Kwon O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:6318. doi: 10.1021/ja8097349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (o) Vardhineedi S, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2010;12:1084. doi: 10.1021/ol100078w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (p) Khong SN, Tran YS, Kwon O. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:4760. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2010.03.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (q) Martin TJ, Tran YS, Vakhshori V, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2011;13:2586. doi: 10.1021/ol200697m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (r) Szeto J, Sriramurthy V, Kwon O. Org. Lett. 2011;13:5420. doi: 10.1021/ol201730q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (s) Fan YC, Kwon O. In: Phosphine Catalysis, in Science of Synthesis. List B, editor. Vol. 1. New York: Asymmetric Organocatalysis, Lewis Base and Acid Catalysis, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Stuggart; 2012. pp. 713–782. [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Ciclosi M, Fava C, Galeazzi R, Orena M, Sepulveda- Arques J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:2199. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kobbelgaard S, Brandes S, Jørgensen KA. Chem. Eur. J. 2008;14:1464. doi: 10.1002/chem.200701729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.See the Supporting Information‡ for details regarding reaction optimization. Cursory attempts at employing commercially available cinchona alkaloids for the asymmetric variant of the rearrangement failed to produce the desired products in appreciable yields.
- 14.Ye L-W, Sun X-L, Wang Q-G, Tang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:5951. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cowen BJ, Saunders LB, Miller S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:6105. doi: 10.1021/ja901279m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Trost BM, Dake GR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:7595. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.