Abstract
Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only treatment that provides long lasting relief of allergy symptoms. Unfortunately, SIT-based traditional remedies carry the risk of producing local and/or systemic side effects. To improve the safety and efficacy of SIT, it has been proposed that SIT must utilize allergens that are hypoallergenic but hyperimmunogenic. Therefore, we used DNA shuffling to generate mutant genes encoding hypoallergens with potent immunogenicity and screened them for their capacity to modify the allergic response. We tentatively shuffled the major group 1 allergen genes from house dust mite, Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and discovered a novel chimeric gene, termed C 1. The gene was expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) and the chimeric protein C 1 was purified. An animal model of asthma demonstrated that C 1 not only decreased the production of serum IgE and IgG1, and inhibited the production of IL-4 and IL-5 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). C 1 also boosted the levels of IgG2a and IFN-γ, which may demonstrate a rebalance of TH1 and TH2 allergic response. Additionally, flow cytometry showed that the immunogenicity of C 1 was higher than that of ProDer f 1, but was not significantly different from that of ProDer p 1. Our findings suggest that the C 1 is hypoallergenic and yet highly immunogenic, which makes it potentially safe and effective for use in SIT of allergic asthma.
Keywords: Dermatophagoides allergen 1 group, DNA shuffling, specific immunotherapy, allergenicity, immunogenicity
Introduction
Exposure to allergens from two species of house dust mites, Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, are associated with various allergic diseases such as asthma [1]. More than 80% of allergic patients sensitized to house dust mites have immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies against the group 1 allergens D. farinae and D. pteronyssinus [2,3]. The group 1 allergens (Der f 1 and Der p 1), have cysteine protease activity [4], are involved in the pathogenesis of allergic inflamation [5,6], and IgE specific to Der f 1 has been reported to cross-react with Der p 1 and vice versa [7,8].
Since there has been a large increase in the prevalence of allergic disease in the past decades, there has been an increasing initiative to develop new and safe treatments for allergic inflammation. Some of these approaches have targeted IgE and the IgE-mediated allergic reaction [9-11]. However, specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only current treatment that provides long-lasting relief of allergic symptoms. SIT is performed by injecting a patient with increasing doses of an often poorly-characterized allergen extract. Although the efficacy of allergen extract-based SIT has been well-documented, it bears the risk of sporadic IgE-mediated side effects, including local and systemic anaphylaxis, and induction of new sensitizations [12-14]. Therefore, allergens that have a reduced IgE-binding and increased T-cell epitopes have been proposed to improve the safety and efficacy of SIT [15,16].
DNA shuffling along with large-scale screening provides an efficient method to select the candidates that have the desired properties [17-19]. This approach has been successfully applied in the discovery of hypoallergens that have potent immunogenicity for use in SIT. For example, DNA shuffling was used in multigene recombination of three group 2 allergen genes from the dust mites Lepidoglyphus destructor and Glycyphagus domesticus [15] and 14 allergen genes of the Bet v 1 family [16]. However, there are few published studies that provide data concerning the homologue allergen genes from D. farinae and D. pteronyssinus recombined by DNA shuffling.
In this study, we applied DNA shuffling to two group 1 mite allergen genes: one group 1 allergen from D. farinae (ProDer f 1) and another group 1 allergen from D. pteronyssinus (ProDer p 1). The amino acid sequences of these two allergens have 82% similarity, and are well adapted templates for DNA shuffling for generating hypoallergens. On this basis, we successfully screened one chimeric gene, referred to as C 1, encoding a protein that had hypoallergenicity and high T-cell immunogenicity. The inhibitor effects of the C 1 protein on allergic inflammatory in vivo and in vitro were identical.
Materials and methods
Animals
Female BALB/c mice (6 weeks of age) were purchased from the Center for Comparative Medicine, Yangzhou University (License No.: SCXK 2007-0001) and provided with food and water ad libitum under specific-pathogen free conditions. All procedures were approved by the Research Ethics Board of Wannan Medical College.
DNA shuffling of allergen genes and screening
Two allergen genes, ProDer f 1 (GenBank No. AB034946.1) and ProDer p 1 (GenBank No. U11695.1) served as templates for DNA shuffling. They were amplified using PCR and specific primers as follows: 5’- TAT GGA TCC CGT CCA GCT TCA ATC AAA ACT -3’ (BamH I) and 5’- GGC CTC GAG TCA CAT GAT TAC AAC ATA TGG -3’ (Xho I) for ProDer f 1, 5’- GGC GGA TCC TCA TCG ATC AAA ACT TTT GAA -3’ (BamH I) and 5’- GGC CTC GAG TCA GAG AAT GAC AAC ATA TGG ATA -3’ (Xho I) for ProDer p 1. The chimeric library was constructed by DNA shuffling according to the protocols described by Stemmer [17]. The shuffled DNA library was inserted into a pUCm-T vector (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), and sequenced on an ABI DNA sequencer (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequenced chimeric genes were aligned with parental genes to select for mutant clones. Amino acid sequences encoded by the selected clones were used to predict T- and B-cell epitopes with NetMHCII 2.2 software (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/) in the HLA-DRB1*0301 and HLA-DRB1*0401 alleles which are associated with human asthma [20]. A shuffled gene, named C 1, was selected and its amino acid sequence was shown to have reserved T cell epitopes and decreased B cell epitopes.
Expression and purification of the proteins
The chimeric gene (C 1) was inserted into vector pET-28a(+) (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and transformed into the E. coli line BL21 (DE3) (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). C 1 expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl 1-thio-b-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) (Sigma-Aldrich® Co. LLC. St Louis, MO, USA) at 37°C for 5 h. The C 1 protein in cell pellets was purified with a Ni+-NTA affinity column chromatography kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression and purification of rProDer f 1 and rProDer p 1 was also carried out as described above. The endotoxin levels in the protein preparations were analyzed using a HEK-Blue™ LPS Detection Kit (Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA).
Western blotting
Equimolar amounts (2.0 mmol/L) of the 3 recombinant proteins, rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1, and C 1, were analyzed on a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel according to Laemmli’s method [21] in a Mini-PROTEAN 3 system (Bio-Rad, Berkeley, CA, USA) and transferred onto an Immobilon-P membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated in blocking buffer (5% dried milk, 0.5% Tween-20 in PBS, pH 7.2) for at least 30 min. Afterward, the membranes were incubated for 2 h in blocking buffer containing Der f 1-specific rabbit polyclonal antiserum (obtained after immunization of rabbits with the purified native Der f 1 protein) diluted 1:10000 with PBS (pH 7.2). A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich® Co. LLC., St Louis, MO, USA) diluted 1:10000 with PBS (pH 7.2) was used as a secondary antibody, followed by three washes with blocking buffer (20 min each). Transferred proteins were visualized using a DAB Horseradish Peroxidase Color Development Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) in PBS (pH 7.2) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Determination of the IgE-binding activity
IgE-binding was measured using an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Twenty-five serum samples were obtained from D. farinea-allergic patients at the Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College. The Medical Ethics Committee of Wannan Medical College approved collection of these samples. Immunoplates were coated overnight with rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1 or C 1 (500 ng/well) at 4°C. Plates were washed with 100 μl per well of Tris-buffered saline (TBS)-Tween buffer (TBST, 50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5; 150 mmol/L NaCl; 0.1% Tween-20) five times and blocked for 1 h at 37°C with 150 μl of TBST supplemented with 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich® Co. LLC.). Sera from 25 patients allergic to D. farinea (diluted 1:8 in TBST buffer; all of the individual sera had a RAST value > 100 kU/L) were then incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed 5 times with TBST buffer; the allergen-IgE complexes were detected by incubation with HRP-sheep anti human IgE (Sigma-Aldrich® Co. LLC.; diluted 1:1000 in TBST buffer) at 37°C for 2 h. The plate was then washed 5 times with TBST, and 3,3’, 5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate solution was added and the plate for incubated for 20 min at 37°C. Fifty microliter of stop buffer was added to each well to terminate the reaction and the absorbance of the plate was measured at 450 nm on a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The standard curve control was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions provided by ELISA kit (R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Development of mouse models with asthma and ASIT
Seventy-five BALB/c mice were randomly assigned to the following 5 groups with 15 mice in each group: PBS, asthma, rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1 and C 1. On days 0, 7 and 14, the mice in the PBS group received an intraperitoneal injection of 100 μl PBS, and the mice in the asthma group received an intraperitoneal injection of 10 μg mixed allergens (equal measures of rProDer f 1 and rProDer p 1). The mice in the rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1, and C 1 groups were intraperitoneally injected with 10 μg of rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1, and C 1, respectively. These injected protein were dissolved in 100 μl PBS containing 2% (W/V) Al(OH)3 suspension. On day 21, the mice were caged in a home-made airway challenge apparatus, and challenged by nebulized inhalation of allergen suspension for 30 min. The mice were subsequently challenged this way for the next consecutive days. The mice in the PBS group were challenged with PBS, and the mice in the asthma group were challenged with 0.5 μg/ml of rProDer f 1. The mice in the rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1, and C 1 groups were challenged with 0.5 μg/ml of rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1, and C 1, respectively. Subsequently, the mice in the PBS group received both an intraperitoneal injection and aerosol inhalation of PBS. The asthma group was not subjected to a treatment. The mice in the rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1 and C 1 groups underwent SIT by intraperitoneal injection of 200 μl of rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1, and C 1 (100 μg/ml), respectively. SIT was performed each day for 30 min prior to the inhalation treatment on days 25-27.
Detection of cytokines in BALF and antibodies in sera
Twenty-four hours after the final aerosol challenge, the mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 100 μl of 0.5% pentobarbital sodium. The trachea of each mouse was cannulated, a syringe with 19-gauge needle was used to inject 0.3 ml of sterilized PBS into the airway through the trachea and the resulting bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was withdraw. This was repeated 2 more times, resulting in a total volume of 0.9 ml BALF per mouse. Subsequently, the BALF was centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 5 min at 4°C and the supernatant was collected and stored at -80°C. Blood samples were collected via the orbital cavity, centrifuged at 4000 ×g for 5 min at 4°C and stored at -80°C. The amounts of IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 and TGF-β in the BALF, and the amounts of serum antibodies of IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a in the serum were measured using ELISA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
In vitro flow cytometry (FCM) determination
Twenty-four hours after the final challenge of each group of mice, their spleen was aseptically removed and processed into a splenocyte suspension using 300-steel mesh filtration. Contaminating red blood cells were lysed with an erythrocyte lysate for 5 min and the suspension was centrifuged at 1000 ×g for 5 min at room temperature. The precipitate was re-suspended in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) and the cell pellet was washed twice with RPMI-1640. The cells were resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium at a concentration 1 × 106/ml, and 200 μl of splenocyte suspension and 50 μl C 1 (rProDer f 1/rProDer p 1/PBS) was added to each well of a 96-well culture plate. The splenocytes isolated from the mice in the asthma group were left untreated. The cultures were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 60 h. After the incubation, 5 μl of mouse phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-CD4 and 5 μl of phycoerythrin cyanin 5.1 (PC5)-labeled anti-CD3 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) were added to each well and incubated for 30 min in an iced bath in the dark. The samples were centrifuged at 1200 ×g for 10 min at 4°C. After removal of the supernatant, the sample was washed twice with 500 μl of PBS, and resuspended in 200 μl of PBS. The cell viability and purity was analyzed by flow cytometry (Coulter® Epics XL-MCL™ Flow Cytometer, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) and the data were analyzed using Cellquest software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using SPSS for Windows, version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), and the statistical data for each group was expressed in x̅ ± s in terms of one-factor analysis of variance. The group comparisons were performed using least significant difference-t (LSD-t) and Thamhane’s T2 analysis. A P-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as significant.
Results
DNA shuffling
The chimeric gene pool, with ProDer f 1 and ProDer p 1 as templates, was successfully shuffled by PCR amplification using ProDer f 1 primers (Figure 1). DNA sequencing revealed that about 10% of the clones in the library exhibited shuffled sequences and/or point mutations, based on a comparison with two parental genes. The frequency of clones without expression of full-length protein was more than 90% according to the amino acid sequences encoded by DNA assemblies. In these colonies, the C 1 gene exhibited obvious mutation (Figure 2A). The amino acid sequence encoded by C 1 was also characterized by a number of T cell epitopes which was similar to the two parental allergens (Table 1), but the number of B cell epitopes was reduced (Table 2). A comparison with the parental proteins showed that some of the characterizations of C 1 were changed, including the T cell epitopes [22] and B cell epitopes (Figure 2B) [23], but the basic structure of the protein (such as the disulfide backbones) were retained.
Figure 1.

Procedures of DNA shuffling. M: DNA Marker; 1-2: PCR products of ProDer f 1 and ProDer p 1, respectively; 3: Products from enzyme digestion of ProDer f 1 and ProDer p 1 with equivalent mixture; 4-6: Amplification of the small segments (50-150 bp) in consecutive three rounds of primerless PCR; 7: Chimeric gene pools after amplification by PCR with ProDer f 1 primers.
Figure 2.

Biochemical and immunological characterization of C 1. A. Alignment of the two parental genes (ProDer f 1 and ProDer p 1) with the chimeric gene C 1. B. Amino acid sequence comparison among Der f 1 and Der p 1, and C 1. The sequences above match those used to locate the B-cell epitopes (underlined in pink) and the T-cell epitopes (underlined in red or green). Green amino acids indicate a signal peptide sequence; blue amino acids indicate a propeptide sequence; black amino acids indicate a mature sequence; a blue background represents active sites, while green, yellow, or pink backgrounds represent disulfide bridges. Potential N-glycosylation sites are underlined in black.
Table 1.
Comparison of T-cell epitope counts in proteins deduced from C 1, ProDer f 1, and ProDer p 1
| HLA-DRB10301 | HLA-DRB10401 | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Strong bond* | Weak bond* | Strong bond* | Weak bond* | ||
| ProDer f 1 | 6 | 28 | 15 | 85 | 134 |
| ProDer p 1 | 3 | 37 | 10 | 105 | 155 |
| C 1 | 10 | 24 | 2 | 111 | 147 |
According to the annotation given on http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/.
Table 2.
Comparison of B cell epitope counts in proteins deduced from C 1, ProDer f 1, and ProDer p 1
| ProDer f 1 | ProDer p 1 | C 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of B cell epitope | 103 | 99 | 82 |
Expression and purification of C 1
C 1 was expressed as a C-terminus His6-tagged protein that accumulated in inclusion bodies in E. coli and was purified to homogeneity by nickel affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions. The purified C 1 was refolded using successive dialysis against decreasing concentrations of urea, and migrated as a single band at 35 kD on SDS-PAGE (Figure 3A). The band was also recognized by polyclonal antibodies produced in rabbits immunized with the Der f 1 allergen. This result confirmed that C 1 was homologous with two parental allergens, rProDer f 1 and rProDer p 1 (Figure 3B). The endotoxin content in the wild-type allergen and the shuffled allergen C 1 preparations ranged between 0.29 and 7.32 ng/mg protein (median 1.07 ng/mg). The amount of endotoxin in the preparations was not correlated with their proliferative capacity when they were analyzed in the lymphoproliferation assay.
Figure 3.

Purification and analysis of C 1. A. Expression and purification of C 1. Products of empty vector pET28a(+) (lane 1), products of pET28a(+)-C 1 induction (lane 2) and purified C 1 (lane 3); B. Western blot analysis of rProDer f 1 (lane 1), rProDer p 1 (lane 2) and C 1 (lane 3).
C 1 displaying a reduced IgE-binding reactivity
The sera were tested by ELISA using plates coated with equivalent amounts of rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1 or C 1. Results (Figure 4) showed that the binding capacity of C 1 to IgE from the sera of D. farinea-allergic patients (37.03 ± 12.46 μg/ml; P < 0.001) was strikingly reduced as compared to the binding capacity of the parental allergens, rProDer f 1 (80.44 ± 15.50 μg/ml) and rProDer p 1 (90.79 ± 10.38 μg/ml).
Figure 4.

IgE reactivity to rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1, and C 1. **Compared with rProDer f 1 and rProDer p 1 groups, P < 0.001.
C 1 enabling T-cell stimulation
To further observe whether C 1 was sufficient to stimulate the differentiation of ProDer f 1/ProDer p 1-specific T cells, we analyzed spleen cells taken from mice that had been immunized to rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1 or C 1 in vitro. The number of CD3+CD4+ T cells in each group was detected using flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that C 1 (3347 ± 1136 cells/200 μl) was able to re-stimulate the CD3+CD4+ T cells isolated from mice immunized with C 1, but there had little effect on CD3+CD4+ T cells isolated from mice in the PBS group (112 ± 20 cells/200 μl, P < 0.01), asthma group (188 ± 34 cells/200 μl, P < 0.01) and rProDer f 1 group (383 ± 93 cells/200 μl, P < 0.01). This result suggests that C 1 retained the relevant ProDer f 1-specific T cell epitopes (Figure 5). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the C 1 group and rProDer p 1 group (2658 ± 1130 cells/200 μl, P = 0.775).
Figure 5.

Number of CD3+CD4+ T cells in each experimental group as determined by FCM. Note: a, compared with PBS group, P < 0.01; b, compared with asthma group, P < 0.01; c, compared with rProDer f 1 group, P < 0.01.
Evaluation of the prophylactic potential of C 1 in mouse model
To verify the effects of C 1 on ASIT in an animal asthma model, mice were sensitized and challenged with these allergen proteins and their BALF was analyzed for the amount of IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-5 and the amount of IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a in their serum was analyzed by ELISA. Similar to mice immunized with rProDer f 1 (322.98 ± 30.36 pg/ml) and rProDer p 1 (314.97 ± 33.89 pg/ml), mice immunized by C 1 produced a higher amount of IFN-γ (343.43 ± 38.79 pg/ml) than mice in the asthma group (208.44 ± 46.11 pg/ml, P < 0.01) (Figure 6A). Conversely, the results in Figure 6B and 6C show a lower productions of IL-4 (37.01 ± 4.00 pg/ml), and IL-5 (118.65 ± 24.23 pg/ml) by mice immunized with C 1, compared to IL-4 and IL-5 levels for the asthma group (74.29 ± 9.70 pg/ml, P < 0.01; 379.10 ± 38.39 pg/ml, P < 0.01; respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference in IL-4 and IL-5 production between rProDer f 1 (43.97 ± 10.13 pg/ml in IL-4; 241.58 ± 37.18 pg/ml in IL-5) and rProDer p 1 (55.06 ± 9.68 pg/ml in IL-4, P > 0.05; 304.70 ± 39.90 pg/ml in IL-5, P > 0.05) immunized mice. The results in Figure 6D also show that mice immunized with C 1 produced more IL-10 (341.10 ± 79.09 pg/ml) compared to mice in the PBS (68.84 ± 14.73 pg/ml, P < 0.01), asthma (103.14 ± 19.59 pg/ml, P < 0.01), rProDer f 1 (232.01 ± 51.22 pg/ml, P < 0.01), and rProDer p 1 groups (248.12 ± 80.13 pg/ml, P < 0.05). As shown in Figure 6E, a similar trend was observed in the level of TGF-β produced by mice in the C 1 group (76.89 ± 11.13 pg/ml, P < 0.01), compared with mice in the PBS (0.35 ± 0.46 pg/ml, P < 0.01), asthma (31.78 ± 8.82 pg/ml, P < 0.01), rProDer f 1 (57.17 ± 9.40 pg/ml, P < 0.01), and rProDer p 1 groups (59.37 ± 16.0 pg/ml) (P < 0.05).
Figure 6.

Levels of IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 and TGF-β in BALF after SIT using rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1 and C 1. PBS: negative control; Asthma: control; rProDer f 1: positive control 1 (SIT with rProDer f 1 allergen); rProDer p 1: positive control 2 (SIT with rProDer p 1 allergen); C 1: experimental (SIT with C 1 allergen). Note: a, compared with PBS group, P < 0.01; b, compared with asthma group, P < 0.01; c, compared with rProDer f 1 and rProDer p 1 groups, P < 0.01; d, compared with rProDer p 1 group, P < 0.01; e, compared with rProDer p 1 group, P < 0.05.
An analysis of the serum IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a antibody levels in Figure 7 suggests that the amount of IgE in the serum of mice in the C 1 group (26.84 ± 5.09 μg/ml) was significantly lower than in the mice in the asthma (53.55 ± 9.37 μg/ml, P < 0.01), rProDer f 1 (34.07 ± 4.72 μg/ml, P < 0.01) and rProDer p 1 groups (38.48 ± 4.40 μg/ml, P < 0.01). The serum IgG1 levels were also significantly different between the mice in the C 1 group (28.84 ± 3.77 μg/ml) and the PBS (7.79 ± 3.40 μg/ml, P < 0.01), asthma (56.48 ± 8.27 μg/ml, P < 0.01), rProDer f 1 (35.47 ± 3.77 μg/ml, P < 0.01) and rProDer p1 groups (37.55 ± 4.52 μg/ml, P < 0.01). Finally, the serum IgG2a levels in C 1 immunized mice (52.55 ± 7.37 μg/ml) was significantly higher compared to the mice in the PBS (9.76 ± 3.03 μg/ml, P < 0.01), asthma (28.37 ± 3.82 μg/ml, P < 0.01), rProDer f 1 (37.55 ± 4.52 μg/ml, P < 0.01) and rProDer p 1 groups (35.47 ± 3.77 μg/ml) (P < 0.01).
Figure 7.

The levels of IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a antibody in sera after SIT using rProDer f 1, rProDer p 1 and C 1. PBS: negative control; Asthma: control; rProDer f 1: positive control 1 (SIT with rProDer f 1 allergen); rProDer p 1: positive control 2 (SIT with rProDer p 1 allergen); C 1: experimental (SIT with C 1 allergen). Note: a, compared with PBS group, P < 0.01; b, compared with asthma group, P < 0.01; c, compared with rProDer f 1 and rProDer p 1 groups, P < 0.01.
Discussion
House dust mites of the Dermatophagoides genus (D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae) are an important causative factor of various allergic diseases, such as bronchial asthma [24,25]. Group 1 (Der p 1 and Der f 1) allergens are considered to be one of the major house dust mite allergens, based on the frequency of sensitization in allergic patients, their ability to induce high amounts of specific IgE, and their high content in mite extracts [26]. SIT for mite allergy is routinely carried out using mite extracts that are prepared from whole dust mite extracts. However, the use of such crude extracts has numerous disadvantages [27], including the presence of undefined nonallergenic materials, difficulties in extract standardization, the risk of inducing anaphylactic side-effects and induction of new IgE sensitizations [28-30]. However, the use of DNA technologies can address these problems and recombinant allergens with desirable properties have become available [31,32]. Hypoallergens with poor IgE-binding capacity but sustained immunogenicity have been obtained by recombinant DNA technologies [33-35]. In this study, we attempted to experimentally recombine the group 1 allergen genes (ProDer f 1 and ProDer p 1) in vitro using DNA shuffling and then we screened for proteins that had reduced IgE reactivity while retaining their T-cell epitopes. A sequence analysis showed some mutants in B cell epitopes, but the basic structure was unaffected. The screening result suggested that the chimeric gene C 1 met the criteria for potential use for SIT.
To further verify the low allergenicity but preserved immunogenicity of C 1, we determined the binding capacity of C 1 to IgE in sera from mite-sensitized patients and showed that C 1 had a weakened binding to IgE, compared with the two parental allergens, and suggested that C 1 bears the property of hypoallergenicity. Group 1 mite allergens display strictly conformational IgE-binding epitopes [36,37]. However, the process of shuffling carried frame-shifts and point-mutations that produced a C 1 variant which essentially reduced IgE binding compared with the parental proteins ProDer f 1 and ProDer p 1. One possible explanation for the decreased IgE binding capacity of C 1 is that the substituted amino acid residue(s) is/are part of a dominant B-cell epitope [15]. Another plausible explanation for the decreased IgE reactivity is that the single amino acid substituted in C 1 is important for the tertiary structure of the entire allergen and that the substitution disrupted one or more conformational epitopes [15]. To determine the immunogenicity of C 1, we examined the number of TH cells isolated from the spleen of mice immunized with the different protein constructs, and found that the number of TH cells in the mouse spleens was higher in the C 1 group compared with the asthma and rProDer f 1 groups, but was not significantly different from the rProDer p 1 group. These findings strongly suggest that C 1 possesses immunogenicity greater than or equal to that of the two parental proteins. Also, the T cell epitopes in C 1 represent the preservation or recruitment of T cell epitopes from the parental proteins.
Successful SIT leads to allergen non-responsiveness and symptom relief [12,38], including major changes in the T-cell response to allergens, either through immune deviation of TH1/TH2 imbalance or by induction of allergen-specific antibodies to prevent immediate-type reactions. In previous studies, hypoallergenic derivatives from parental allergens have produced high levels of IgG recognizing wild-type allergens [15,16,28,39]. To further understand the differentiation of subtypes of TH cells, we measured the amount of IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-5 produced by TH1/TH2 cells in the BALF of these mice. We also measured the amount of IL-10 and TGF-β associated with regulatory T cell differentiation. As expected, the levels of IFN-γ, a cytokine predominantly secreted by TH1, were not strikingly different between the two groups of mice immunized with the parental proteins, while IL-4 and IL-5 levels, primarily generated by TH2 cell, were greatly reduced in the C 1 immunized mice compared with mice immunized with the two parental proteins. This implies that C 1 can activate TH1 cell differentiation and inhibit TH2 cell differentiation in the same way as the parental proteins, in agreement with a previous study [40]. An increase in IL-10 and TGF-β suggests that SIT with C 1 promotes Treg cell differentiation/proliferation. Furthermore, the results of our study show that IgG1 levels were significantly down-regulated in C 1 group but IgG2a levels were strikingly raised compared with the other experimental groups. This data strongly suggests that C 1 can modify the imbalance of TH1 and TH2 cells and rectify TH1-biased allergic responses, a necessary process for any therapy that hopes to ameliorate the process of allergic inflammation.
In conclusion, this study recombined the group 1 allergen genes from dust mites using DNA shuffling and the chimeric gene C 1 was successfully screened and expressed. A series of observations confirmed that the chimeric protein C 1 inhibited IgE production, possessed properties of hypoallergenicity, and had the ability to activate T cell differentiation, similar to its two parental proteins. Treatment with the C 1 construct resulted in TH1 cell predominance, suggesting that C 1 may restore the balance between TH1/TH2 cells. Most importantly, our study offers further evidence that DNA shuffling is an effective method for in vitro recombination of homologous genes in a directed evolution experiment. Successfully screening high-grade chimeric C 1 favorable to SIT will form a basis for further investigation of eligible treatment options for allergic disorders involving anaphylactic dust mites.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 81270091; No. 81172790; No. 30872367) and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (No. 070413088).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Platts-Mills TA, Chapman MD. Dust mites: immunology, allergic disease, and environmental control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987;80:755–775. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(87)80261-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chapman MD, Platts-Mills TA. Purification and characterization of the major allergen from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-antigen P1. J Immunol. 1980;125:587–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tovey ER, Chapman MD, Platts-Mills TA. Mite faeces are a major source of house dust allergens. Nature. 1981;289:592–593. doi: 10.1038/289592a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Takai T, Kato T, Sakata Y, Yasueda H, Izuhara K, Okumura K, Ogawa H. Recombinant Der p 1 and Der f 1 exhibit cysteine protease activity but no serine protease activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;328:944–952. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shakib F, Ghaemmaghami AM, Sewell HF. The molecular basis of allergenicity. Trends Immunol. 2008;29:633–642. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reed CE, Kita H. The role of protease activation of inflammation in allergic respiratory diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:997–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.060. quiz 1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yasueda H, Mita H, Yui Y, Shida T. Comparative analysis of physicochemical and immunochemical properties of the two major allergens from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and the corresponding allergens from Dermatophagoides farinae. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1989;88:402–407. doi: 10.1159/000234724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takai T, Kato T, Yasueda H, Okumura K, Ogawa H. Analysis of the structure and allergenicity of recombinant pro- and mature Der p 1 and Der f 1: major conformational IgE epitopes blocked by prodomains. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115:555–563. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhu D, Kepley CL, Zhang K, Terada T, Yamada T, Saxon A. A chimeric human-cat fusion protein blocks cat-induced allergy. Nat Med. 2005;11:446–449. doi: 10.1038/nm1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Valenta R, Vrtala S, Focke-Tejkl M, Bugajska S, Ball T, Twardosz A, Spitzauer S, Gronlund H, Kraft D. Genetically engineered and synthetic allergen derivatives: candidates for vaccination against type I allergy. Biol Chem. 1999;380:815–824. doi: 10.1515/BC.1999.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takai T, Kato T, Hatanaka H, Inui K, Nakazawa T, Ichikawa S, Mitsuishi K, Ogawa H, Okumura K. Modulation of allergenicity of major house dust mite allergens Der f 1 and Der p 1 by interaction with an endogenous ligand. J Immunol. 2009;183:7958–7965. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0713276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Larche M, Akdis CA, Valenta R. Immunological mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:761–771. doi: 10.1038/nri1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ball T, Sperr WR, Valent P, Lidholm J, Spitzauer S, Ebner C, Kraft D, Valenta R. Induction of antibody responses to new B cell epitopes indicates vaccination character of allergen immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:2026–2036. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199906)29:06<2026::AID-IMMU2026>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moverare R, Elfman L, Vesterinen E, Metso T, Haahtela T. Development of new IgE specificities to allergenic components in birch pollen extract during specific immunotherapy studied with immunoblotting and Pharmacia CAP System. Allergy. 2002;57:423–430. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.13248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gafvelin G, Parmley S, Neimert-Andersson T, Blank U, Eriksson TL, van Hage M, Punnonen J. Hypoallergens for allergen-specific immunotherapy by directed molecular evolution of mite group 2 allergens. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:3778–3787. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607938200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Niederberger V, Horak F, Vrtala S, Spitzauer S, Krauth MT, Valent P, Reisinger J, Pelzmann M, Hayek B, Kronqvist M, Gafvelin G, Gronlund H, Purohit A, Suck R, Fiebig H, Cromwell O, Pauli G, van Hage-Hamsten M, Valenta R. Vaccination with genetically engineered allergens prevents progression of allergic disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(Suppl 2):14677–14682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404735101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stemmer WP. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature. 1994;370:389–391. doi: 10.1038/370389a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stemmer WP. DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:10747–10751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crameri A, Raillard SA, Bermudez E, Stemmer WP. DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution. Nature. 1998;391:288–291. doi: 10.1038/34663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horne C, Quintana PJ, Keown PA, Dimich-Ward H, Chan-Yeung M. Distribution of DRB1 and DQB1 HLA class II alleles in occupational asthma due to western red cedar. Eur Respir J. 2000;15:911–914. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15e17.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kwon SS, Kim N, Yoo TJ. The effect of vaccination with DNA encoding murine T-cell epitopes on the Der p 1 and 2 induced immunoglobulin E synthesis. Allergy. 2001;56:741–748. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.056008741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Halleux S, Stura E, VanderElst L, Carlier V, Jacquemin M, Saint-Remy JM. Three-dimensional structure and IgE-binding properties of mature fully active Der p 1, a clinically relevant major allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:571–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sporik R, Chapman MD, Platts-Mills TA. House dust mite exposure as a cause of asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 1992;22:897–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb02062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Platts-Mills TA, Vervloet D, Thomas WR, Aalberse RC, Chapman MD. Indoor allergens and asthma: report of the Third International Workshop. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100:S2–24. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70292-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thomas WR, Smith WA, Hales BJ, Mills KL, O’Brien RM. Characterization and immunobiology of house dust mite allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002;129:1–18. doi: 10.1159/000065179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Valenta R, Niederberger V. Recombinant allergens for immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:826–830. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Asturias JA, Ibarrola I, Arilla MC, Vidal C, Ferrer A, Gamboa PM, Vinuela JE, Sanz ML, Andreu C, Martinez A. Engineering of major house dust mite allergens Der p 1 and Der p 2 for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39:1088–1098. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Ree R, Antonicelli L, Akkerdaas JH, Garritani MS, Aalberse RC, Bonifazi F. Possible induction of food allergy during mite immunotherapy. Allergy. 1996;51:108–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Westritschnig K, Valenta R. Can we genetically engineer safer and more effective immunotherapy reagents? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;3:495–500. doi: 10.1097/00130832-200312000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Linhart B, Valenta R. Molecular design of allergy vaccines. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17:646–655. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Valenta R, Kraft D. Recombinant allergens: from production and characterization to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of allergy. Methods. 2004;32:207–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2003.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Deb R, Shakib F, Reid K, Clark H. Major house dust mite allergens Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 1 and Dermatophagoides farinae 1 degrade and inactivate lung surfactant proteins A and D. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:36808–36819. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702336200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Drew AC, Eusebius NP, Kenins L, de Silva HD, Suphioglu C, Rolland JM, O’Hehir RE. Hypoallergenic variants of the major latex allergen Hev b 6.01 retaining human T lymphocyte reactivity. J Immunol. 2004;173:5872–5879. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Eriksson TL, Gafvelin G, Elfman LH, Johansson C, Van Hage-Hamsten M, Olsson S. T cell responses to recombinant isoforms, synthetic peptides and a mutant variant of Lep d 2, a major allergen from the dust mite Lepidoglyphus destructor. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31:1881–1890. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Walgraffe D, Matteotti C, El Bakkoury M, Garcia L, Marchand C, Bullens D, Vandenbranden M, Jacquet A. A hypoallergenic variant of Der p 1 as a candidate for mite allergy vaccines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:1150–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lombardero M, Heymann PW, Platts-Mills TA, Fox JW, Chapman MD. Conformational stability of B cell epitopes on group I and group II Dermatophagoides spp. allergens. Effect of thermal and chemical denaturation on the binding of murine IgG and human IgE antibodies. J Immunol. 1990;144:1353–1360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Till SJ, Francis JN, Nouri-Aria K, Durham SR. Mechanisms of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:1025–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.024. quiz 1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gafvelin G, Thunberg S, Kronqvist M, Gronlund H, Gronneberg R, Troye-Blomberg M, Akdis M, Fiebig H, Purohit A, Horak F, Reisinger J, Niederberger V, Akdis CA, Cromwell O, Pauli G, Valenta R, van Hage M. Cytokine and antibody responses in birch-pollen-allergic patients treated with genetically modified derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005;138:59–66. doi: 10.1159/000087358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hattori K, Nishikawa M, Watcharanurak K, Ikoma A, Kabashima K, Toyota H, Takahashi Y, Takahashi R, Watanabe Y, Takakura Y. Sustained exogenous expression of therapeutic levels of IFN-gamma ameliorates atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice via Th1 polarization. J Immunol. 2010;184:2729–2735. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
