Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2014 Jun 15;7(7):3662–3672.

In vitro differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into endometrial epithelial cells in mouse: a proteomic analysis

Qing Cong 1,2, Bin Li 1,2, Yisheng Wang 1,2, Wenbi Zhang 1,2, Mingjun Cheng 1,2, Zhiyong Wu 1,2, Xiaoyan Zhang 1,2, Wei Jiang 1,2, Congjian Xu 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC4128977  PMID: 25120742

Abstract

Objective: Mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have been demonstrated to differentiate into female endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) in vivo. Our previous studies demonstrated that BMSCs can differentiate in the direction of EECs when co-cultured with endometrial stromal cells in vitro. Here, we obtain and analyse differential proteins and their relevant pathways in the process of BMSCs differentiating into EECs by isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) proteomic analysis. Methods: A 0.4-μm pore size indirect co-culture system was established with female mice endometrial stromal cells (EStCs) restricted in the upper Transwell chamber and BMSCs in the lower well plate. After indirect co-culture for several days, the BMSCs were revealed to progressively differentiate towards EECs in vitro. Then, four groups were divided according to different co-culture days with single culture groups of BMSCs as controls. Proteins were detected using iTRAQ based on 2DLC-ESI-MS/MS and data were analysed by bioinformatics. Results: A total number of 311 proteins were detected, of which 210 proteins were identified with relative quantitation. Among them, 107 proteins were differentially expressed with a 1.2-fold change as the benchmark, with 61 up-regulated and 46 down-regulated proteins. Differential proteins CK19 and CK8 were epithelial markers and upregulated. Stromal marker vimentin were downregulated. Top canonical pathways was “remodeling of epithelial adhesions junctions” and “actin cytoskeleton signaling”. Top networks was “cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, tissue development and cellular movement” regulated by ERK/MAPK and α-catenin. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first preliminary study of differential protein expression in the differentiation process of BMSCs into EECs in vitro. We further elucidated BMSCs differentiated in the direction of EECs. In addition, ERK/MAPK and α-catenin played important roles by regulating core differential proteins in the “cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, tissue development and cellular movement” network.

Keywords: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, endometrial epithelial cells, differentiation, proteomic analysis

Introduction

The human endometrium is a dynamic tissue that undergoes more than 400 cycles of regeneration, differentiation, and shedding during a woman’s reproductive years [1]. Endometriosis is the development of endometrial tissue outside of the uterus [2]. It affects 10%-15% of reproductive-age women and can cause pelvic pain and infertility [3]. Increasing evidence has shown that stem cells can contribute to endometrium and endometriosis [4-15]. Donor bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have been identified in the endometrium of female bone marrow transplant recipients; these cells appear to be histologically indistinguishable from the endogenous endometrial cells and express markers of glandular and stromal differentiation [8]. In addition, cells derived from the bone marrow of male donor mice have been found to contribute to EECs and stroma de novo in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of female mice in vivo [4]. Stem cell markers oct-4 and c-kit were found to be expressed in ectopic epithelial cells, which suggests the stem cell origin [5].

Recently, our group demonstrated in mice that BMSCs could differentiate in the direction of EECs in vitro by indirect co-culture BMSCs with endometrial stromal cells (EstCs) [9]. In this co-culture system, cells cannot pass the Transwell membrane (cross-culture room, pore size 0.4 μm, Millipore, USA), while small molecular substances can pass freely in the culture media. Thus, EStCs could induce BMSCs by paracrine signalling in the microenvironment, which is somewhat similar to environments that exist in vivo. After 7 days of indirect co-culture, expression of epithelial markers (cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 18, cytokeratin 19, and epithelial membrane antigen) was tested in BMSCs using real-time RT-PCR, and expression of pan cytokeratin (CK) was tested using immunofluorescence staining. The mRNA levels of CK7, CK18 and CK19 were significantly higher in the co-culture system than in the control group (BMSCs cultured alone) (P < 0.05). Pan CK was positive in the co-cultured BMSCs and negative in the control group.

Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), is a shot-gun-based technique that allows the concurrent identification and relative quantification of hundreds of proteins in up to 8 different biological samples in a single experiment [16,17]. The technology has many advantages, such as having relatively high throughput due to sample multiplexing, and it has been shown to be suitable for the identification of low abundance proteins such as transcription factors [18].

To further illuminate BMSCs differentiate in the direction of EECs and obtain information in this process, we tend to acquire differential proteins using iTRAQ and potential pathways by IPA (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis Software).

Materials and methods

Animals

All wild-type female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Shanghai Slac Laboratory Animal Corporation. They were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions with a light/dark cycle of 12/12 h. All experiments were approved by the institutional experimental animals review board of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University.

Indirect co-culture system of BMSCs and EStCs

The protocol for the isolation and flow cytometry characterization of BMSCs has been previously reported [9]. Isolation and immunocytochemistry characterization of EStCs was based on a previous report [19]. BMSCs and EStCs were co-cultured indirectly in transwell system (cross-culture room, pore size 0.4 μm, Millipore, USA). In brief, the BMSCs were seeded in the bottom of 6-well plate (6 × 105 cells/well) and the EStCs (6 × 104 cells/well) were seeded on the transwell membrane to separate the cells but allowing soluble factors to pass freely (Figure 1A). The culture medium was changed every 2 days. Totally, 2.9 × 107 BMSCs of passage 2 were seeded in 6-well plates co-culture system to generate enough protein of BMSCs co-cultured for 3 days and 7 days for proteomic analysis and Western blot.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Isolation, characterization and co-culture of BMSCs and EStCs. A: Flow cytometric analysis of BMSCs cell surface markers expression from primary culture. Mesenchymal stem cell surface marker CD29 expression rate was 81.22% compared to the isotype and haemapoietic stem cell surface marker CD34 expression rate was 20.86% compared to the isotype. B: Primary culture of EStCs and immunocytochemistry characterisation. Negative control was stained with no primary antibody (up). EStCs were positive for stromal marker vimentin (down). Original magnifications × 400. C: Schematic diagram of co-culture system.

Protein digestion, iTRAQ labelling and strong cation exchange fractionation (SCX)

All samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 60 s to collect cells in the Eppendorf microcentrifuge tubes. Each sample was then lysed by adding 50 μL of hypotonic buffer consisting of 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 65 mM DTT (DL-Dithiothreitol), 0.02% SDS cocktail and sonicated once. Total protein contents were determined using the commercial Bradford assay reagent (Bio-Rad, California, USA). A standard curve for the Bradford assay was made using γ-globulin as a control.

From each sample, 100 μg was denatured, and the cysteines were blocked as described in the iTRAQ protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Each sample was digested with 0.2 mL of a 50 μg/mL trypsin (Promega, Wisconsin, USA) solution at 37°C overnight and labelled with the iTRAQ tags as follows (Figure 2): BMSCs cultured alone for 3 days, iTRAQ115; BMSCs co-cultured for 3 days, iTRAQ116; BMSCs cultured alone for 7 days, iTRAQ117 and BMSCs co-cultured for 7 days, iTRAQ118. The labelled samples were combined, desalted with Sep-Pak Vac C18 cartridge 1 cm3/50 mg (Waters, USA), and fractionated using a Shimazu UFLC system (Shimazu, Japan) connected to a strong cation exchange (SCX) column (polysulfethyl column, 2.1 mm × 100 mm, 5 μm, 200 Å, The Nest Group, Inc. USA). SCX separation was performed using a linear binary gradient of 0-45% buffer B (350 mM KCl, 10 mM KH2PO4 in 25% ACN, pH 2.6) in buffer A (10 mM KH2PO4 in 25% ACN, pH2.6) at a flow rate of 200 μL/min for 90 min, and 30 fractions were collected every 3 min. Each fraction was dried down and redissolved in buffer C (5% (v/v) acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid solution), and the fractions with high KCl concentration were desalted with PepClean C-18 spin Column (Pierce, USA).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Experimental workflow of proteomic analysis of in vitro differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into endometrial epithelial cells in mouse using iTRAQ technique.

DLC-ESI-MS/MS

All SCX fractions were analysed 3 times using a QSTAR XL LC-MS/MS system (Applied Biosystems, USA) and RPLC column (ZORBAX 300SB-C18 column, 5 μm, 300 Å, 0.1 mm × 15 mm, Microm, Auburn, CA). The RPLC gradient was 5% to 35% buffer D (95% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) in buffer C at a flow rate of 0.3 μL/min in 120 min.

The Q-TOF instrument was operated in positive ion mode with ion spray voltage typically maintained at 2.0 kV. Mass spectra of the iTRAQ-labelled samples were acquired in an information-dependent acquisition mode. The analytical cycle consisted of a MS survey scan (400-2000 m/z) followed by 5-s MS/MS scans (50-2000) of the 5 most abundant peaks (i.e., precursor ions), which were selected from the MS survey scan. Precursor ion selection was based upon ion intensity (peptide signal intensity above 25 counts/s) and charge state (2+ to 4+), and once the ions were fragmented in the MS/MS scan they were allowed 1 repetition before a dynamic exclusion for a period of 120 s. Because of the iTRAQ tags, the parameters for rolling collision energy (automatically set according to the precursor m/z and charge state) were manually optimised. Under CID, iTRAQ-labelled peptides fragmented to produce reporter ions at 115.1, 116.1, 117.1, and 118.1, and fragment ions of the peptides were simultaneously produced, resulting in sequencing of the labelled peptides and identification of the corresponding proteins. The ratios of the peak areas of the four iTRAQ reporter ions reflected the relative abundances of the peptides and the proteins in the samples. Calibration of the mass spectrometer was carried out using BSA tryptic peptides.

Protein identification and data analysis

Protein identification and quantification for iTRAQ experiments was carried out using the ProteinPilot software v3.0 (Applied Biosystems, USA). The search was performed against an International Protein Index (IPI) mouse database (version 3.28) downloaded from the EBI Web site. The Paragon algorithm in ProteinPilot software was used as the default search program with trypsin as the digestion agent and cysteine modification of methyl methanethiosulfonate. The search also included the possibility of more than 80 biological modifications and amino acid substitutions of up to two substitutions per peptide using the BLOSUM 62 matrix. Only proteins identified with at least 95% confidence, or a ProtScore of 1.3, were reported. The results obtained from ProteinPilot v3.0 software were exported to Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Access for further analysis.

A 1.2-fold change (ratio of BMSCs co-cultured for 7 days to BMSCs co-cultured for 3 days, i.e.,7co/3co) was used as the benchmark. All proteins that showed significantly altered expression levels went through Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (IPA) for pathway and network analysis.

Results

BMSCs and EStCs primary culture and characterisation

CD29 is one of mesenchymal stem cell surface markers and CD34 is one of haemopoietic stem cell markers [13,20,21]. The flow cytometry analysis showed that the 81.22% of BMSCs were positive for CD29, and 20.86% of BMSCs were positive for CD34 (Figure 1B). Cultured EStCs were confirmed by the immunocytochemistry experiments to show that they were positive for the stromal cell marker vimentin (Figure 1C). By culture alone and co-culture, samples from the following four groups were acquired: Group 1: BMSCs cultured alone for 3 days (3a), Group 2: BMSCs co-cultured for 3 days (3co), Group 3: BMSCs cultured alone for 7 days (7a) and Group 4: BMSCs co-cultured for 7 days (7co).

Differential proteins identified in differentiation by iTRAQ proteomics

Samples from all 4 groups were digested, quantified and underwent iTRAQ proteomics. A total of 9932 peptides were identified, 6549 of which were unique. These identified peptides correspond to a set of 311 proteins with more than 95% confidence (ProtScore ≥ 1.3). Of 213 proteins that were identified with a global false discovery rate from fit values of 1%, 210 proteins were identified with relative quantitation (Supplementary Table 1).

According to the ratio of BMSCs co-cultured for 7 days (7co) to those co-cultured for 3 days (3co), 107 proteins were differentially expressed, with 61 up-regulated and 46 down-regulated proteins (Table 1). According to the ratio of BMSCs co-cultured for 7 days (7co) to those cultured alone for 7 days (7a), 104 proteins were differentially expressed, with 56 up-regulated and 48 down-regulated proteins (Supplementary Table 2). According to the ratio of BMSCs co-cultured for 3 days (3co) to those cultured alone for 3 days (3a), 132 proteins were differentially expressed, with 75 up-regulated and 57 down-regulated proteins (Supplementary Table 3). In the 3 groups above (7co/3co, 7co/7d, 3co/3d), 17 proteins are common in 3 groups and 79 proteins are common in 2 groups (Table 2, Figure 3).

Table 1.

One hundred and seven differential proteins (61 up-regulated and 46 down-regulated) were listed based on the ratio of BMSCs co-cultured for 7 days (7co) to those co-cultured for 3 days (3co)

No. Gene symbol Accession Protein name %Cov 118:116
1 Nes IPI00453692.4 Isoform 1 of Nestin 29.67 0.05
2 Snrpb IPI00114052.1 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated protein B 58.87 0.39
3 Sfrs7 IPI00222763.1 Isoform 1 of Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 7 73.03 0.50
4 Hist3h2a IPI00221463.3 Histone H2A type 3 83.08 0.51
5 Hnrnpab IPI00117288.3 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A/B 37.54 0.52
6 Capza1 IPI00653841.1 Capping protein (actin filament) muscle Z-line, alpha 1 41.38 0.52
7 Rplp0 IPI00314950.2 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 19.56 0.56
8 Sfpq IPI00129430.1 Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich 42.92 0.58
9 Tubb5 IPI00117352.1 Tubulin beta-5 chain 51.13 0.61
10 Psmb1 IPI00113845.1 Proteasome subunit beta type-1 precursor 53.75 0.63
11 Ppia IPI00554989.3 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 78.44 0.69
12 P4hb IPI00133522.1 Protein disulfide-isomerase precursor 52.06 0.70
13 EG666548 IPI00752639.1 Similar to ribosomal protein L23a 32.90 0.70
14 Dync1h1 IPI00119876.1 Cytoplasmic dynein 1 heavy chain 1 23.13 0.72
15 mCG_17237 IPI00673288.1 predicted pseudogene 10116 71.04 0.72
16 Ywhab IPI00760000.1 Isoform Short of 14-3-3 protein beta/alpha 49.18 0.72
17 Hmgn2 IPI00650026.1 High mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 53.13 0.73
18 Col1a1 IPI00329872.1 Isoform 1 of Collagen alpha-1(I) chain precursor 69.99 0.74
19 Kpnb1 IPI00742334.1 Karyopherin (importin) beta 1 17.92 0.74
20 Hnrnpa1 IPI00553777.2 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 68.90 0.75
21 Calr IPI00123639.1 Calreticulin precursor 54.57 0.76
22 LOC100046745 IPI00625588.1 Similar to Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial 26.33 0.77
23 Pdia6 IPI00222496.3 Thioredoxin domain containing 7 21.80 0.77
24 Slc3a2 IPI00114641.2 CD98 heavy chain 37.97 0.77
25 Tln1 IPI00465786.3 Talin-1 33.57 0.77
26 Phb IPI00133440.1 Prohibitin 44.49 0.77
27 Hdlbp IPI00123379.1 Vigilin 29.02 0.79
28 Pabpc1 IPI00331552.4 Poly A binding protein, cytoplasmic 1 49.53 0.79
29 Acaa2 IPI00226430.2 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial 42.32 0.79
30 Mdh2 IPI00323592.2 Malate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial 29.59 0.80
31 LOC672195 IPI00222419.5 Cytochrome c, somatic 79.05 0.80
32 Gnb2l1 IPI00317740.5 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-2-like 1 54.89 0.81
33 Atp5h IPI00881799.1 ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F0 complex, subunit d 61.59 0.81
34 Gpi1 IPI00228633.7 Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase 26.16 0.81
35 Hspd1 IPI00308885.6 Isoform 1 of 60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial 55.85 0.81
36 Vdac1 IPI00230540.1 Isoform Mt-VDAC1 of Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 63.25 0.81
37 Rplp2 IPI00139795.2 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2 79.13 0.81
38 LOC674678 IPI00623776.3 Similar to histone H4 44.94 0.81
39 LOC100041245 IPI00851010.1 Similar to Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) 61.20 0.82
40 Bat1a IPI00409462.2 Spliceosome RNA helicase Bat1 28.50 0.82
41 Dpysl2 IPI00114375.2 Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 2 34.79 0.82
42 Eno1 IPI00462072.3 Enolase 1, alpha non-neuron 71.20 0.82
43 Immt IPI00381412.1 Isoform 2 of Mitochondrial inner membrane protein 33.24 0.82
44 Sod2 IPI00109109.1 Superoxide dismutase [Mn], mitochondrial 47.30 0.83
45 Hnrnpa3 IPI00269662.1 Isoform 2 of Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3 72.27 0.83
46 Got2 IPI00117312.1 Aspartate aminotransferase, mitochondrial 42.09 0.83
47 Vat1 IPI00126072.2 Synaptic vesicle membrane protein VAT-1 homolog 36.21 1.20
48 Actg2 IPI00266875.5 Smooth muscle gamma-actin 71.25 1.21
49 Ppib IPI00135686.2 Peptidylprolyl isomerase B 57.87 1.21
50 EG667035 IPI00755353.2 Similar to fusion protein: ubiquitin (bases 43_513); ribosomal protein S27a 54.49 1.21
51 Iqgap1 IPI00467447.3 Ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP1 28.85 1.22
52 Lasp1 IPI00125091.1 LIM and SH3 domain protein 1 25.48 1.22
53 Pfn1 IPI00224740.6 Profilin-1 48.57 1.22
54 LOC100045699 IPI00848492.1 Similar to Electron transferring flavoprotein, beta polypeptide isoform 2 36.82 1.24
55 Col6a3 IPI00877197.1 Collagen alpha3(VI) precursor (Fragment) 39.46 1.24
56 Flnb IPI00663627.1 Filamin, beta 36.16 1.25
57 Gpnmb IPI00311808.2 Transmembrane glycoprotein NMB precursor 41.64 1.25
58 Reversed IPI00651986.1 7 days neonate cerebellum cDNA, hypothetical protein 14.75 1.26
59 Hsp90b1 IPI00129526.1 Endoplasmin precursor 38.78 1.26
60 Atp5c1 IPI00776084.1 ATP synthase gamma chain 48.15 1.26
61 Efhd2 IPI00226872.1 SWIPROSIN 1 35.00 1.28
62 Psap IPI00321190.1 Sulfated glycoprotein 1 precursor 30.70 1.28
63 Phb2 IPI00321718.4 Phb2 Prohibitin-2 52.84 1.28
64 Tpi1 IPI00467833.5 Triosephosphate isomerase 54.62 1.28
65 Hsp90ab1 IPI00554929.2 Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta 45.03 1.29
66 Eif4a1 IPI00118676.3 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-I 42.61 1.31
67 Ncl IPI00317794.5 Nucleolin 33.38 1.31
68 Anxa4 IPI00877291.1 Annexin A4 50.47 1.31
69 Anxa2 IPI00468203.3 Annexin A2 65.78 1.32
70 Tuba3b IPI00466390.1 Tubulin alpha-3 chain 42.22 1.32
71 Sept7 IPI00874440.1 Septin-7 44.50 1.33
72 Cald1 IPI00462119.3 Caldesmon 1 57.30 1.34
73 Ran IPI00134621.3 GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran 31.02 1.36
74 Hspa1a IPI00798482.4 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A 35.26 1.37
75 Tpm4 IPI00421223.3 Tropomyosin alpha-4 chain 75.40 1.38
76 Cltc IPI00648173.1 Clathrin, heavy polypeptide 22.28 1.38
77 Gm2a IPI00119095.3 Ganglioside GM2 activator precursor 23.83 1.39
78 Tmpo IPI00828976.1 Thymopoietin isoform epsilon 34.29 1.39
79 LOC632297 IPI00417181.3 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-7C precursor 21.47 1.41
80 Blvrb IPI00113996.7 Flavin reductase 57.77 1.46
81 Ckap4 IPI00223047.2 Cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 34.26 1.47
82 Actn1 IPI00380436.1 Alpha-actinin-1 38.45 1.47
83 P4ha1 IPI00399959.1 Isoform 2 of Prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunit alpha-1 precursor 35.96 1.49
84 Anxa6 IPI00310240.4 Annexin A6 isoform b 35.68 1.49
85 Sfrs6 IPI00310880.4 Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 6 54.57 1.50
86 Aldh2 IPI00111218.1 Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial 35.84 1.51
87 Col6a2 IPI00621027.2 Collagen alpha-2(VI) chain precursor 36.85 1.53
88 Gsn IPI00117167.2 Isoform 1 of Gelsolin precursor 43.85 1.53
89 Cat IPI00869393.1 Catalase 39.47 1.56
90 Mrc1 IPI00126186.1 Macrophage mannose receptor 1 precursor 17.72 1.57
91 Dbn1 IPI00331516.3 Isoform E2 of Drebrin 21.33 1.61
92 Ahnak IPI00553798.2 AHNAK nucleoprotein isoform 1 64.02 1.64
93 Arpc1b IPI00874737.2 Actin related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 1B 36.83 1.66
94 Hk2 IPI00114342.1 Hexokinase-2 33.81 1.67
95 Tpm1 IPI00403987.2 Tropomyosin 1, alpha 76.76 1.71
96 LOC623483 IPI00660661.2 Similar to ribosomal protein L22 61.78 1.71
97 Hspg2 IPI00515360.8 Perlecan 28.41 1.72
98 Basp1 IPI00129519.3 Brain acid soluble protein 1 66.81 1.74
99 Oat IPI00129178.1 Ornithine aminotransferase, mitochondrial 21.87 1.87
100 Krt8 IPI00322209.5 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 8 58.57 1.89
101 Snx2 IPI00109212.3 Sorting nexin-2 20.04 1.98
102 Arhgdib IPI00122568.3 Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 25.00 1.98
103 Lrp1 IPI00119063.2 Prolow-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 precursor 27.24 2.13
104 Hspa9 IPI00880839.1 Heat shock protein 9 53.61 2.63
105 Krt19 IPI00112947.1 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19 67.74 2.94
106 Fn1 IPI00652813.1 Fibronectin 1 53.20 3.73
107 Gusb IPI00421209.3 Glucuronidase, beta 37.96 4.74

Table 2.

Seventy-nine proteins common in 2 of 3 groups (7co/3co, 7co/7d, 3co/3d) were listed

Upregulated gene symbol and protein name

Actg2 Smooth muscle gamma-actin
Ppib Peptidylprolyl isomerase B
Iqgap1 Ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP1
Pfn1 Profilin-1
Col6a3 Collagen alpha3(VI) precursor (Fragment)
Tpi1 Triosephosphate isomerase
Anxa4 Annexin A4
Tuba3b Tubulin alpha-3 chain
Sept7 Septin-7
Hspa1a Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A
Gm2a Ganglioside GM2 activator precursor
Tmpo Thymopoietin isoform epsilon
LOC632297 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-7C precursor
Blvrb Flavin reductase
Actn1 Alpha-actinin-1
P4ha1 Isoform 2 of Prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunit alpha-1 precursor
Sfrs6 Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 6
Aldh2 Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
Col6a2 Collagen alpha-2(VI) chain precursor
Mrc1 Macrophage mannose receptor 1 precursor
Dbn1 Isoform E2 of Drebrin
Ahnak AHNAK nucleoprotein isoform 1
Arpc1b Actin related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 1B
LOC623483 Similar to ribosomal protein L22
Basp1 Brain acid soluble protein 1
Arhgdib Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2
Hsp90b1 Endoplasmin precursor
Psap Sulfated glycoprotein 1 precursor
Cltc Clathrin, heavy polypeptide
Gusb Glucuronidase, beta
Atp5b ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial
Cisd1 CDGSH iron sulfur domain-containing protein 1
Eif5a Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1
Myl6 Isoform Smooth muscle of Myosin light polypeptide 6
Ywhaz 14-3-3 protein zeta/delta
Eif2s1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 1
Pgk1 Phosphoglycerate kinase 1
LOC100041245 Similar to Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase(GAPDH)
Scpep1 Serine carboxypeptidase 1
Sod1 Superoxide dismutase
Bat1a Spliceosome RNA helicase Bat1
Tagln2 Transgelin 2

Downregulated gene symbol and protein name

Nes Isoform 1 of Nestin
Snrpb Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated protein B
Sfrs7 Isoform 1 of Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 7
Hist3h2a Histone H2A type 3
Hnrnpab Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A/B
Sfpq Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich
Ppia Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase
P4hb Protein disulfide-isomerase precursor
EG666548 Similar to ribosomal protein L23a
Kpnb1 Karyopherin (importin) beta 1
Slc3a2 CD98 heavy chain
Tln1 Talin-1
Acaa2 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial
LOC672195 Cytochrome c, somatic
Eno1 Enolase 1, alpha non-neuron
Immt Isoform 2 of Mitochondrial inner membrane protein
Sod2 Superoxide dismutase [Mn], mitochondrial
Got2 Aspartate aminotransferase, mitochondrial
Dync1h1 Cytoplasmic dynein 1 heavy chain 1
Rplp2 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2
LOC674678 Similar to histone H4
Hnrnpa3 Isoform 2 of Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3
Krt19 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19
Krt8 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 8
Hsp90ab1 Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta
Samm50 Sorting and assembly machinery component 50 homolog
Abhd12 Abhydrolase domain-containing protein 12
D1Pas1 Putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase Pl10
Dci Dodecenoyl-Coenzyme A delta isomerase
Glud1 Glutamate dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial
Vdac2 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 2
Gsn Isoform 1 of Gelsolin precursor
Hist2h2ac Histone H2A type 2-C
LOC675857 Similar to valosin isoform 1
Prdx1 Peroxiredoxin-1
Calm3 Calmodulin 3
Flnb Filamin, beta

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Differentially expressed proteins in 7co/3co (118:116), 7co/7a (118:117) and 3co/3a (116:115) groups were diagrammed and common proteins were marked in bold.

Bioinformatic analysis of differential proteins

To interpret the alterations in the differentiation process, we used IPA to analyse and acquired canonical pathways and top networks based on differentially expressed proteins. In the 107 differential proteins in 7co/3co group, the top 10 canonical pathways were “remodeling of epithelial adhesions junctions”, “actin cytoskeleton signaling”, “epithelial adhesions junction signaling”, “germ cell-Sertoli cell junction signaling”, “glycolysis I”, “glyconeogenesis I”, “superoxide radicals degradation”, “aspartate degradation II”, “regulation of actin-based motility by Rho”, “aldosterone signaling in epithelial cells”, “phenylalanine degradation IV” (Figure 4). In the 79 common proteins in 2 groups, the top 10 canonical pathways were “actin cytoskeleton signaling”, “remodeling of epithelial adherens junctions”, “regulation of actin-based motility by Rho”, “epithelial adhesions junction signaling”, “glyconeogenesis I”, “RhoA signaling”, “superoxide radicals degradation”, “germ cell-sertoli cell junction signaling”, “NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response”, “phenylalanine degradation IV” (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Top 10 canonical pathways that differential proteins in 7co/3co group participated in were illustrated.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Top 10 canonical pathways that 79 common proteins participated in were illustrated.

The top 4 networks that differential proteins in 7co/3co group participated in were the “cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, tissue development and cellular movement” network (score = 28), the “cell morphology, nerve development and function, organ morphology” network (score = 24), the “cell morphology, cellular function and maintenance, cell death and survival” network (score = 20), and the “amino acid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry, protein synthesis” network (score = 20). Among them, core proteins of the network 1 (Figure 6) were Fn1, Col1A1, Lrp1, Hsp90b1, which were regulated by ERK1/2, ERK and α-catenin.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Top network that differential proteins in 7co/3co group participated in was “cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, tissue development, cellular movement”. Core proteins, i.e., Fn1, Col1A1, Lrp1, Hsp90b1 were regulated by ERK1/2, ERK and α-catenin.

Discussion

Primary culture of BMSCs and EStCs provided the basis for iTRAQ proteomics in 4 groups. In order to reveal potential changes in the differentiation process, we compared proteins quantity in 7co group with 3co group (7co/3co).

Nes was the most significantly regulated differential protein with a 20-fold change (ratio 0.05) in expression. Nes is a type VI intermediate filament protein that is expressed in dividing cells during the early stages of development in the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and in myogenic and other tissues [22,23]. In depth studies of Nes indicate that it plays a complex role in the regulation of the assembly and disassembly of intermediate filaments that participate in cell remodelling [23]. Nes is a marker of proliferating and migrating cells and becomes down-regulated upon differentiation [23,24]. In our study, Nes was most significantly down-regulated protein, showing that co-cultured BMSCs significantly differentiated and their proliferating and migrating ability substantially decreased, which was in accordance withtheir differentiation into EECs. Epithelial marker CK19, CK8 were both upregulated and listed in differential proteins (ratio 2.94, 1.89 respectively, Table 1). Stromal marker vimentin were down-regulated (ratio 0.90). Both the increase of CK19, CK8 and the decrease of vimentin demonstrated that BMSCs differentiated in the direction of EECs in the co-culture system.

The top 20 canonical pathways showed amazing consistence in 7co/3co and common differential proteins groups. In both groups, the “remodeling of epithelial adhesions junctions” and “actin cytoskeleton signaling” were the top 2 canonical pathway. In addition, “epithelial adhesions junction signaling”, “germ cell-sertoli cell junction signaling”, “regulation of actin-based motility by Rho” are another 3 canonical pathways. All these canonical pathways implicated that epithelial adhesion junction and motility were significantly regulated.

In the top network, ERK1/2 played important roles by regulating core proteins, including Fn1, Col1a1. ERK1 was also known as MAPK3; ERK or ERK2 was known as MAPK1. The ERK (extracellular-regulated kinase)/MAPK (mitogen activated protein kinase) pathway is a key pathway that transduces cellular information on meiosis/mitosis, growth, differentiation and carcinogenesis within a cell. ERK in the cytoplasm can phosphorylate a variety of targets which include cytoskeleton proteins, ion channels/receptors and translation regulators. Fn1 (fibronectin 1) is a glycoprotein present in a soluble dimeric form in plasma, and in a dimeric or multimeric form at the cell surface and in extracellular matrix. It is involved in cell adhesion and migration processes and canonical pathway “actin cytoskeleton signaling” [25,26]. In our study, Fn1 was the 2nd most significantly upregulated differential protein (ratio 3.73) regulated by ERK1/2, which demonstrated increased cell adhesion and decreased migration in “actin cytoskeleton signaling” canonical pathway. Col1a1 (Isoform 1 of Collagen alpha-1(I) chain precursor), is the fibrillar collagen found in most connective tissues. In our study, Col1a1 were significantly downregulated (ratio 0.74) demonstrated the stromal component decreased in condition of co-culture, which indicated that BMSCs tended to differentiate into EECs in the co-culture system.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of protein alterations in the differentiation process of BMSCs in the direction of EECs in vitro. Both epithelial marker and stromal marker expression alteration further implicated the differentiation process. Our study also indicated that ERK/MAPK might play potential important roles by regulating core differential proteins in the “cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, tissue development and cellular movement” network.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Medicine Guide Project of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (114119a2300) and the State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes of China (No. 90-07-05).

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

Supporting Information

ijcep0007-3662-f7.xls (126.5KB, xls)

References

  • 1.Jabbour HN, Kelly RW, Fraser HM, Critchley HO. Endocrine regulation of menstruation. Endocr Rev. 2006;27:17–46. doi: 10.1210/er.2004-0021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gargett CE. Uterine stem cells: what is the evidence? Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:87–101. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eskenazi B, Warner ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997;24:235–258. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70302-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Du H, Taylor HS. Contribution of bone marrow-derived stem cells to endometrium and endometriosis. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2082–2086. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pacchiarotti A, Caserta D, Sbracia M, Moscarini M. Expression of oct-4 and c-kit antigens in endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1171–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kondo W, Dal Lago EA, Francisco JC, Simeoni RB, de Noronha L, Martins AP, de Azevedo ML, Ferreira CC, Maestrelli P, Olandoski M, Guarita-Souza LC, do Amaral VF. Effect of the bone marrow derived-mononuclear stem cells transplantation in the growth, VEGF-R and TNF-alpha expression of endometrial implants in Wistar rats. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158:298–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gotte M, Wolf M, Staebler A, Buchweitz O, Kelsch R, Schuring AN, Kiesel L. Increased expression of the adult stem cell marker Musashi-1 in endometriosis and endometrial carcinoma. J Pathol. 2008;215:317–329. doi: 10.1002/path.2364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor HS. Endometrial cells derived from donor stem cells in bone marrow transplant recipients. Jama. 2004;292:81–85. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang WB, Cheng MJ, Huang YT, Jiang W, Cong Q, Zheng YF, Xu CJ. A study in vitro on differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into endometrial epithelial cells in mice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;160:185–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chan RW, Kaitu’u-Lino T, Gargett CE. Role of label-retaining cells in estrogen-induced endometrial regeneration. Reprod Sci. 2012;19:102–114. doi: 10.1177/1933719111414207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ye L, Mayberry R, Lo CY, Britt KL, Stanley EG, Elefanty AG, Gargett CE. Generation of human female reproductive tract epithelium from human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gargett CE, Schwab KE, Zillwood RM, Nguyen HP, Wu D. Isolation and culture of epithelial progenitors and mesenchymal stem cells from human endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2009;80:1136–1145. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.075226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Co-expression of two perivascular cell markers isolates mesenchymal stem-like cells from human endometrium. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2903–2911. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chan RW, Gargett CE. Identification of label-retaining cells in mouse endometrium. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1529–1538. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chan RW, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1738–1750. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.024109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zieske LR. A perspective on the use of iTRAQ reagent technology for protein complex and profiling studies. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:1501–1508. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S, Khainovski N, Pillai S, Dey S, Daniels S, Purkayastha S, Juhasz P, Martin S, Bartlet-Jones M, He F, Jacobson A, Pappin DJ. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3:1154–1169. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M400129-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Aggarwal K, Choe LH, Lee KH. Shotgun proteomics using the iTRAQ isobaric tags. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006;5:112–120. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/ell018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McCormack SA, Glasser SR. Differential response of individual uterine cell types from immature rats treated with estradiol. Endocrinology. 1980;106:1634–1649. doi: 10.1210/endo-106-5-1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Patki S, Kadam S, Chandra V, Bhonde R. Human breast milk is a rich source of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells. Hum Cell. 2010;23:35–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-0774.2010.00083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Soleimani M, Nadri S. A protocol for isolation and culture of mesenchymal stem cells from mouse bone marrow. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:102–106. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guerette D, Khan PA, Savard PE, Vincent M. Molecular evolution of type VI intermediate filament proteins. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Michalczyk K, Ziman M. Nestin structure and predicted function in cellular cytoskeletal organisation. Histol Histopathol. 2005;20:665–671. doi: 10.14670/HH-20.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kleeberger W, Bova GS, Nielsen ME, Herawi M, Chuang AY, Epstein JI, Berman DM. Roles for the stem cell associated intermediate filament Nestin in prostate cancer migration and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9199–9206. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Henderson B, Nair S, Pallas J, Williams MA. Fibronectin: a multidomain host adhesin targeted by bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35:147–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Leiss M, Beckmann K, Giros A, Costell M, Fassler R. The role of integrin binding sites in fibronectin matrix assembly in vivo. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:502–507. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ijcep0007-3662-f7.xls (126.5KB, xls)

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES