Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2014 Jun 15;7(7):4104–4111.

Decreased LINE-1 methylation levels in aldosterone-producing adenoma

Chen Chen 1,*, Xiaoyu Zhou 2,*, Jing Jing 1, Jing Cheng 1, Yu Luo 1, Jiachao Chen 1, Xi Xu 1, Fei Leng 1, Xiaomu Li 1, Zhiqiang Lu 1
PMCID: PMC4129024  PMID: 25120789

Abstract

Purpose: Abnormal global DNA methylation levels are associated with many diseases. In this study, we examined long interspersed nuclear elements-1 (LINE-1) methylation as a biomarker for abnormal global DNA methylation and aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA). Methods: Tissues from 25 APA and 6 normal adrenal glands (NAs) were analyzed for LINE-1 methylation by real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The estimated LINE-1 methylation level was then tested for correlation with the clinicopathologic parameters of APA patients. Results: The methylation index (MI) level for LINE-1 was 0.91 in NA samples and 0.77 in APA samples (P < 0.001). For the APA samples, there were no statistical correlations between the MI level and various clinicopathologic parameters such as gender (P = 0.07). Conclusion : LINE-1 methylation is significantly lower in APA samples than in NA samples. LINE-1 methylation is not correlated with the clinical characteristics of APA.

Keywords: Long interspersed nuclear elements-1, global DNA methylation, aldosterone-producing adenoma

Introduction

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most prevalent form of endocrine hypertension [1]. PA results from autonomous aldosterone secretion, which then leads to hypertension with hypokalemia and suppressed renin activity. The two major subtypes of PA are unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, which together account for approximately 95% of cases [2]. Although some evidence indicates that a subset of PAs arise from somatic mutations in the gene encoding the selectivity filter of the KCNJ5 K+ channel [3], the ATP1A1 gene encoding the Na+/K+ ATPase α subunit and the ATP2B3 gene encoding a Ca2+ ATPase [4], the pathophysiological mechanisms resulting in APA and the development of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are still not well understood.

Increasing evidence indicates that epigenetic events, such as genome-wide losses in DNA methylation, frequently occur in malignancies and may be critical in carcinogenesis [5,6]. Loss of DNA methylation is also associated with other disease states including stroke and heart disease [7]. As there are critical links between genomic hypomethylation and pathogenesis, there is growing interest in understanding how changes in the global status of DNA methylation can be used as biomarkers for diseases such as APA.

Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1) are non-long terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons that make up approximately 17% of the human genome, with 500,000 elements normally dispersed throughout the human genome [8,9]. LINE-1 sequences are frequently repeated and widely interspersed human retrotransposons; therefore, their methylation levels can mark changes in global genomic DNA methylation [10]. In this study, we evaluated LINE-1 methylation status in APA.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

This hospital-based study on APA (25 cases) was conducted in the Department of Endocrinology, Zhongshan Hospital. The cases, which were clinically diagnosed and histologically confirmed according to the guidelines of the Endocrine Society [11], were from patients aged 31 to 70 years (mean, 48 ± 11 years) recruited between 2009 and 2013. All of the recruited patients were Chinese. We used the plasma aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR) for case detection (ARR > 40; plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) (ng/dl) / plasma renin activity (PRA) [ng/(ml·h)]). All patients showed positive results for at least one of the confirmatory tests, which included the captopril challenge test and the saline infusion test. These tests, as well as the follow-ups, were performed after the patients had discontinued antihypertensive treatment for at least 2 weeks to minimize the interference of medication with the PAC and PRA measurements. In this study, hypokalemia was designated as serum potassium concentrations less than 3.5 mmol/l. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) with ACTH stimulation was performed for all APA diagnoses. The AVS was considered to show a unilateral lesion when the lateralized ratio (LR; high to low side) was greater than 4. Unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in the patients with APA. After the surgery, the hypokalemia was cured in 100% of cases. In addition, the hypertension was either cured or increasingly improved in 100% of cases. The control group (6 cases) was composed of sudden death patients. The 25 APA tissues and 6 normal adrenal (NA) tissues (the adrenal medulla was dissected out) were immediately collected and stored at -196°C in liquid nitrogen.

This study was approved by the Zhongshan Hospital ethics committee. All study subjects provided written informed consent.

Quantification of LINE-1 methylation levels

The DNA from the frozen tissues was isolated using a conventional proteinase-K organic extraction method, as previously described [12]. The frozen pulverized powders containing the genomic DNA were re-suspended in 0.4 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 20 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.5% SDS and 100 mM NaCl). Proteinase K (Tiangen, Shanghai, China) was added to the cellular lysates at a final concentration of 200 μg/ml, and the digestion was carried out at 55°C for 3-5 h. Organic extractions were performed with a half volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (1:1:0.04). The extractions were repeatedly carried out until no visible interphase materials remained after centrifugation. The DNA was precipitated from the aqueous phase in the presence of a one-third volume of 7.5 M NH4Ac and three volumes of ethanol. The DNA pellet was washed once with 75% ethanol and dissolved at 65°C for 10 min with 0.2-0.4 ml TE (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4 and 1 mM EDTA). The DNA was then stored at -20°C until further use. The DNA concentrations were calculated according to their OD 260 nm readings. Sodium bisulfite conversion was performed according to Axel Schumacher’s protocol (http://www.methylogix.com/genetics/protocols.shtml-Dateien/schumachersguide1.html). The level of LINE-1 methylation was measured with a methylation-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay [13,14]. The primers used were as follows:

LINEa: unmethylated LINE-1 forward primer, TGTGTGTGAGTTGAAGTAGGGT; LINEb: unmethylated LINE-1 reverse primer, ACCCAATTTTCCAAATACAACCATCA; LINEc: methylated LINE-1 forward primer, CGCGAGTCGAAGTAGGGC; and LINEd: methylated LINE-1 reverse primer, ACCCGATTTTCCAAATACGACCG.

The plasmid pTA/LINEa-d consisting of the unmethylated and methylated LINE-1 amplicon was generated for use as a constant reference. The PCR products of the unmethylated and methylated LINE-1 sequences were cloned by the pGEM-T Easy Vector system (Tiangen) and designated as pTA/LINEa-b and pTA/LINEc-d, respectively. This plasmid pTA/LINEa-d was used as a standard for the measurement of the unmethylated and methylated LINE-1 sequences. Serial dilutions of this plasmid were used to produce accurate and reproducible results. Real-time PCR was conducted with an Opticon Monitor 3 system (Bio-Rad) using the SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Code: QPK-201). The real-time reactions for the unmethylated and methylated LINE-1 sequences were performed simultaneously in one 96-well plate. The methylation index (MI) for LINE-1 was calculated according to 100 × methylated reaction/(unmethylated reaction + methylated reaction).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS version 17.0). The LINE-1 methylation levels were estimated by independent sample t-tests with MI as a continuous variable. The interactions between LINE-1 methylation and the various clinical parameters were determined by Pearson’s correlation. A probability of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Quantitative methylation levels of LINE-1

We used Opticon Monitor 3 software to compose the standard curves for the methylated and unmethylated LINE-1 reactions (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Standard curves for the methylated and unmethylated LINE-1 reactions.

The MI of LINE-1 was calculated according to the standard curves and listed in Tables 1 and 2. The mean MIs for LINE-1 were 0.77 (mean, 0.77 ± 0.05) for APA and 0.91 (mean, 0.91 ± 0.01) for NA. The LINE-1 MI was significantly lower for the APAs than for the NAs (P < 0.001) (Figure 2). The MIs analyzed according to the Independent Samples T-test protocol (http://lap.umd.edu/psyc200/handouts/psyc200_0812.pdf).

Table 1.

MI values and clinicopathologic parameters of the APA tissues

No Gender Age MI ARR Captopril challenge test Saline infusion test AVS Left: right

1 Female 47 0.75 189 + 4:1
2 Female 31 0.86 48 + 4:1
3 Female 34 0.83 336 + 1:8
4 Male 51 0.79 192 + 1:4
5 Female 51 0.76 236 + 1:6
6 Male 39 0.75 148 + 1:7
7 Male 69 0.83 192 + 1:4
8 Male 54 0.76 74 + 4:1
9 Female 30 0.74 178 + 1:5
10 Male 70 0.70 62 + 5:1
11 Male 36 0.81 386 + 9:1
12 Female 59 0.85 200 + 1:5
13 Female 59 0.73 209 + 8:1
14 Male 46 0.77 52 + 1:4
15 Male 33 0.79 183 + 6:1
16 Male 43 0.80 187 + 1:5
17 Male 49 0.75 511 + 9:1
18 Male 57 0.78 189 + + 6:1
19 Female 48 0.81 141 + 1:6
20 Male 38 0.72 55 + 1:5
21 Male 55 0.73 289 + 5:1
22 Male 38 0.71 137 + 5:1
23 Male 59 0.73 168 + 1:5
24 Male 45 0.69 188 + + 1:4
25 Female 51 0.79 284 + 1:6

No Diameter (cm) Pre-surgery Post-surgery


MAP (mmHg) K+ (mmol/l) PAC (ng/dl) MAP (mmHg) K+ (mmol/l) PAC (ng/dl)

1 1.5 133 2.5 250.0 100 3.5 170.9
2 1.3 128 2.6 301.0 94 4.1 89.0
3 1.1 120 2.0 335.3 96 3.5 98.4
4 1.0 130 2.0 199.2 98 3.6 98.2
5 1.3 146 2.6 305.0 120 3.7 111.6
6 0.6 138 3.1 234.0 136 4.0 143.7
7 1.0 133 2.7 243.0 110 3.4 154.5
8 1.8 133 1.9 162.8 112 3.7 98.0
9 1.0 147 2.8 231.9 95 3.4 100.0
10 1.0 97 2.5 246.6 98 3.7 97.2
11 1.6 160 2.1 193.1 95 3.7 98.0
12 1.6 102 2.0 266.0 103 3.7 121.7
13 1.1 133 2.7 250.6 133 4.0 134.4
14 1.0 143 3.2 204.2 130 3.9 133.6
15 1.5 133 2.7 257.0 94 3.4 100.2
16 1.0 120 2.1 276.0 95 3.7 94.7
17 1.6 147 1.8 306.6 96 3.5 89.9
18 2.0 119 3.3 152.6 110 3.4 99.1
19 1.0 123 3.0 323.1 97 3.7 112.6
20 1.4 149 1.9 253.5 97 3.5 124.8
21 1.2 133 2.3 231.4 118 3.8 160.7
22 1.5 157 3.1 383.6 95 3.9 133.6
23 1.7 130 3.6 218.3 97 4.1 89.7
24 1.5 144 3.2 195.0 94 3.6 96.8
25 1.1 132 1.8 251.0 125 3.4 87.2

Table 2.

MI values and basic information of NAs

No Gender Age MI
1 Female 47 0.93
2 Male 66 0.89
3 Male 20 0.89
4 Male 51 0.92
5 Female 51 0.91
6 Male 39 0.90

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Methylation index (MI) of LINE-1 in the APA and NA tissues (**P < 0.001).

LINE-1 methylation levels and clinicopathologic parameters of APA

The MI values and clinicopathologic parameters for APA are listed in Table 1. Based on the statistical analyses, for APA patients, we estimated the correlation of LINE-1 methylation with various clinicopathologic parameters, including gender, age, tumor diameter, maximum mean arterial pressure (MAP), ARR, and basic PAC (Tables 3 and 4). The MI was tended to be higher in males than in females, but no significant differences were noted (P = 0.07) (Figure 3). There were also no significant linear associations between MI and any of the clinicopathologic parameters.

Table 3.

Linear correlations of the clinical parameters and MI values of LINE-1

Age ARR Diameter Pre-surgery Post-surgery


MAP K+ PAC MAP K+ PAC
MI Coefficient -0.14 0.13 -0.06 -0.31 -0.30 -0.31 -3.0 -1.1 -2.3
P-value* 0.52 0.55 0.77 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.61 0.26
*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed) test.

Table 4.

Clinical parameters of APA

Parameter Age (y) ARR Diameter (cm) Pre-surgery Post-surgery


MAP (mmHg) K+ (mmol/l) PAC (ng/dl) MAP (mmHg) K+ (mmol/l) PAC (ng/dl)
N 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Mean 47 193.36 1.30 133.20 2.50 250.83 105.52 3.68 113.54
SD 11 107.75 0.33 14.86 0.53 54.12 13.69 0.22 24.48
P-value* 0.96 0.96 0.51 0.67 0.58 0.76 0.54 0.41 0.56
*

P < 0.05, the parameter is not normally distributed.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MI values of LINE-1 in males and females.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, LINE-1 methylation is a good indicator of the global DNA methylation level [15]. We estimated the methylation level of LINE-1 in APA and NA tissues using real-time methylation-specific PCR and found that LINE-1 hypomethylation is an important feature of APA. The MI of LINE-1 was 0.91 in NA tissue and 0.77 in APA tissue. There was a significant difference in the MI level of LINE-1 between APA and NA tissue, suggesting that LINE-1 hypomethylation is involved in APA formation as a molecular abnormality. Thus, LINE-1 hypomethylation has the potential to be a biomarker for APA.

According to our study, LINE-1 hypomethylation was not significantly associated with any clinicopathologic features. There was also no significant difference between males and females. Therefore, the associations between LINE-1 methylation and APA appears to be independent of gender, age, tumor diameter, maximum mean arterial pressure, basic plasma aldosterone concentration and aldosterone-renin ratio. Many studies [16,17] have reported that gender is associated with LINE-1 methylation in blood DNA, with males having higher LINE-1 methylation levels. It is not known whether this gender difference is attributable to copy number variation in LINE-1 on the X- and Y-chromosomes or whether sex hormones influence methylation. As Kile et al. reported [18], maternal blood LINE-1 methylation is correlated with offspring LINE-1 methylation. This finding suggests the possibility that LINE-1 methylation levels may be genetically regulated. Thus, gender differences in LINE-1 methylation in blood DNA may be attributable to the sex chromosomes. However, based on our observations, females were tended to be higher LINE-1 methylation levels than males, although the difference was not significant. Additional studies will be required to confirm our results, due to the limits of sample size and tissue specificity in our study.

It is estimated that nearly half of the DNA content in the human genome is composed of repetitive sequences of DNA, such as transposons, retrotransposons and endogenous retroviruses. Typically these elements are non-transcribed and maintained as heterochromatin. Thus, they are characterized as being hypermethylated. LINE-1 elements are the most abundant autonomous retrotransposons in the human genome [19]. A functional full-length LINE-1 element consists of a 5’UTR with an internal RNA polymerase II promoter, two open reading frames (ORF1,2) encoding an RNA binding protein and elements necessary for retrotransposon activity, and a 3’UTR containing a polyadenylation signal [9]. It has been suggested that the 5’ end of the sequence tends to be deleted (but with an unknown frequency) except in more active, evolutionarily newer sequences, which are often present in somatic cells that have undergone malignant transformation [20].

Hypomethylation can cause LINE-1 elements to be transcribed. LINE-1 expression damages host DNA by causing insertions that disrupt gene expression [21] and acting as potent substrates for unequal homologous recombination that leads to gained or lost genomic sequences [22]. However, the detailed examination of LINE-1 methylation and its pathogenic mechanism has been limited by significant technical limitations because there are approximately 500,000 LINE-1 elements in the genome and it is not unknown how many of these are of full length. In our assay, we cannot know for sure how many elements we evaluate or whether this number is similar across samples or individuals [23]. It is thought that LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with many disease states including many types of cancer [24-27], stroke [7] and heart disease [28]. However, there are few studies about LINE-1 methylation and tumors derived from the adrenal gland. Geli et al. [29] assessed LINE-1 methylation in pheochromocytomas and abdominal paragangliomas. Slightly lower levels of LINE-1 methylation were observed in the tumors compared with the normal adrenal samples (P < 0.05).

In our study, we observed obviously lower levels of methylated Line-1 in APA tissues. We hypothesize that the degree of LINE-1 methylation may be different in different tumors derived from the adrenal gland, but this hypothesis will require further studies to verify.

In summary, we report that LINE-1 methylation levels are significantly lower in APA tissue than in NA tissue, with no correlations between MI and clinical characteristics. Further studies using larger sample sizes and different tumor types derived from the adrenal gland should be carried out in the future.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (grant numbers 09411954500).

References

  • 1.Plouin PF, Amar L, Chatellier G. Trends in the prevalence of primary aldosteronism, aldosterone-producing adenomas, and surgically correctable aldosterone-dependent hypertension. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:774–777. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Conn JW, Louis LH. Primary aldosteronism: a new clinical entity. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1955;68:215–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Choi M, Scholl UI, Yue P, Björklund P, Zhao B, Nelson-Williams C, Ji W, Cho Y, Patel A, Men CJ, Lolis E, Wisgerhof MV, Geller DS, Mane S, Hellman P, Westin G, Åkerström G, Wang W, Carling T, Lifton RP. K+ channel mutations in adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas and hereditary hypertension. Science. 2011;331:768–772. doi: 10.1126/science.1198785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beuschlein F, Boulkroun S, Osswald A, Wieland T, Nielsen HN, Lichtenauer UD, Penton D, Schack VR, Amar L, Fischer E, Walther A, Tauber P, Schwarzmayr T, Diener S, Graf E, Allolio B, Samson-Couterie B, Benecke A, Quinkler M, Fallo F, Plouin PF, Mantero F, Meitinger T, Mulatero P, Jeunemaitre X, Warth R, Vilsen B, Zennaro MC, Strom TM, Reincke M. Somatic mutations in ATP1A1 and ATP2B3 lead to aldosterone-producing adenomas and secondary hypertension. Nat Genet. 2013;45:440–444. 444e1–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dunn BK. Hypomethylation: one side of a larger picture. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;983:28–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb05960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gaudet F, Hodgson JG, Eden A, Jackson-Grusby L, Dausman J, Gray JW, Leonhardt H, Jaenisch R. Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation. Science. 2003;300:489–492. doi: 10.1126/science.1083558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baccarelli A, Wright R, Bollati V, Litonjua A, Zanobetti A, Tarantini L, Sparrow D, Vokonas P, Schwartz J. Ischemic heart disease and stroke in relation to blood DNA methylation. Epidemiology. 2010;21:819–828. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f20457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ehrlich M. DNA methylation in cancer: too much, but also too little. Oncogene. 2002;21:5400–5413. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cordaux R, Batzer MA. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Gene. 2009;10:691–703. doi: 10.1038/nrg2640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chowdhury S, Cleves MA, MacLeod SL, James SJ, Zhao W, Hobbs CA. Maternal DNA hypomethylation and congenital heart defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91:69–76. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Funder J, Carey R, Fardella C, Gomez-Sanchez C, Mantero F, Stowasser M, Young W, Montori VM. Case detection, diagnosis,and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3266–3281. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yu J, Zhang HY, Ma ZZ, Lu W, Wang YF, Zhu JD. Methylation profiling of twenty four genes and the concordant methylation behaviours of nineteen genes that may contribute to hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cell Res. 2003;13:319–333. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang C, Xu Y, Zhao J, Fan L, Jiang G, Li R, Ling Y, Wu M, Wei L. Elevated expression of the stem cell marker CD133 associated with Line-1 demethylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2373–2380. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1599-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iacopetta B, Grieu F, Phillips M, Ruszkiewicz A, Moore J, Minamoto T, Kawakami K. Methylation levels of LINE-1 repeats and CpG island loci are inversely related in normal colonic mucosa. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1454–1460. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00548.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Long TI, Kim M, Woods C, Fiala E, Ehrlich M, Laird PW. Analysis of repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6823–6836. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhu ZZ, Hou L, Bollati V, Tarantini L, Marinelli B, Cantone L, Yang AS, Vokonas P, Lissowska J, Fustinoni S, Pesatori AC, Bonzini M, Apostoli P, Costa G, Bertazzi PA, Chow WH, Schwartz J, Baccarelli A. Predictors of global methylation levels in blood DNA of healthy subjects: a combined analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:126–139. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wilhelm CS, Kelsey KT, Butler R, Plaza S, Gagne L, Zens MS, Andrew AS, Morris S, Nelson HH, Schned AR, Karagas MR, Marsit CJ. Implications of LINE1 methylation for bladder cancer risk in women. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1682–1689. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kile ML, Baccarelli A, Tarantini L, Hoffman E, Wright RO, Christiani DC. Correlation of global and gene-specific DNA methylation in maternal-infant pairs. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, Dewar K, Doyle M, FitzHugh W, Funke R, Gage D, Harris K, Heaford A, Howland J, Kann L, Lehoczky J, LeVine R, McEwan P, McKernan K, Meldrim J, Mesirov JP, Miranda C, Morris W, Naylor J, Raymond C, Rosetti M, Santos R, Sheridan A, Sougnez C, Stange-Thomann N, Stojanovic N, Subramanian A, Wyman D, Rogers J, Sulston J, Ainscough R, Beck S, Bentley D, Burton J, Clee C, Carter N, Coulson A, Deadman R, Deloukas P, Dunham A, Dunham I, Durbin R, French L, Grafham D, Gregory S, Hubbard T, Humphray S, Hunt A, Jones M, Lloyd C, McMurray A, Matthews L, Mercer S, Milne S, Mullikin JC, Mungall A, Plumb R, Ross M, Shownkeen R, Sims S, Waterston RH, Wilson RK, Hillier LW, McPherson JD, Marra MA, Mardis ER, Fulton LA, Chinwalla AT, Pepin KH, Gish WR, Chissoe SL, Wendl MC, Delehaunty KD, Miner TL, Delehaunty A, Kramer JB, Cook LL, Fulton RS, Johnson DL, Minx PJ, Clifton SW, Hawkins T, Branscomb E, Predki P, Richardson P, Wenning S, Slezak T, Doggett N, Cheng JF, Olsen A, Lucas S, Elkin C, Uberbacher E, Frazier M, Gibbs RA, Muzny DM, Scherer SE, Bouck JB, Sodergren EJ, Worley KC, Rives CM, Gorrell JH, Metzker ML, Naylor SL, Kucherlapati RS, Nelson DL, Weinstock GM, Sakaki Y, Fujiyama A, Hattori M, Yada T, Toyoda A, Itoh T, Kawagoe C, Watanabe H, Totoki Y, Taylor T, Weissenbach J, Heilig R, Saurin W, Artiguenave F, Brottier P, Bruls T, Pelletier E, Robert C, Wincker P, Smith DR, Doucette-Stamm L, Rubenfield M, Weinstock K, Lee HM, Dubois J, Rosenthal A, Platzer M, Nyakatura G, Taudien S, Rump A, Yang H, Yu J, Wang J, Huang G, Gu J, Hood L, Rowen L, Madan A, Qin S, Davis RW, Federspiel NA, Abola AP, Proctor MJ, Myers RM, Schmutz J, Dickson M, Grimwood J, Cox DR, Olson MV, Kaul R, Raymond C, Shimizu N, Kawasaki K, Minoshima S, Evans GA, Athanasiou M, Schultz R, Roe BA, Chen F, Pan H, Ramser J, Lehrach H, Reinhardt R, McCombie WR, de la Bastide M, Dedhia N, Blöcker H, Hornischer K, Nordsiek G, Agarwala R, Aravind L, Bailey JA, Bateman A, Batzoglou S, Birney E, Bork P, Brown DG, Burge CB, Cerutti L, Chen HC, Church D, Clamp M, Copley RR, Doerks T, Eddy SR, Eichler EE, Furey TS, Galagan J, Gilbert JG, Harmon C, Hayashizaki Y, Haussler D, Hermjakob H, Hokamp K, Jang W, Johnson LS, Jones TA, Kasif S, Kaspryzk A, Kennedy S, Kent WJ, Kitts P, Koonin EV, Korf I, Kulp D, Lancet D, Lowe TM, McLysaght A, Mikkelsen T, Moran JV, Mulder N, Pollara VJ, Ponting CP, Schuler G, Schultz J, Slater G, Smit AF, Stupka E, Szustakowski J, Thierry-Mieg D, Thierry-Mieg J, Wagner L, Wallis J, Wheeler R, Williams A, Wolf YI, Wolfe KH, Yang SP, Yeh RF, Collins F, Guyer MS, Peterson J, Felsenfeld A, Wetterstrand KA, Patrinos A, Morgan MJ, de Jong P, Catanese JJ, Osoegawa K, Shizuya H, Choi S, Chen YJ International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409:860–921. doi: 10.1038/35057062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Skowronski J, Fanning TG, Singer MF. Unit-length line-1 transcripts in human teratocarcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8:1385–1397. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.4.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kazazian HH Jr, Wong C, Youssoufian H, Scott AF, Phillips DG, Antonarakis SE. Haemophilia A resulting from de novo insertion of L1 sequences represents a novel mechanism for mutation in man. Nature. 1988;332:164–166. doi: 10.1038/332164a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jurka J. Evolutionary impact of human Alu repetitive elements. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004;14:603–608. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nelson HH, Marsit CJ, Kelsey KT. Global methylation in exposure biology and translational medical science. Environ Health Perspec. 2011;119:1528–1533. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cho YH, Yazici H, Wu HC, Terry MB, Gonzalez K, Qu M, Dalay N, Santella RM. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation and genomic hypomethylation in tumor, adjacent normal tissues and blood from breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:2489–2496. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi JY, James SR, Link PA, McCann SE, Hong CC, Davis W, Nesline MK, Ambrosone CB, Karpf AR. Association between global DNA hypomethylation in leukocytes and risk of breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1889–1897. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hou L, Wang H, Sartori S, Gawron A, Lissowska J, Bollati V, Tarantini L, Zhang FF, Zatonski W, Chow WH, Baccarelli A. Blood leukocyte DNA hypomethylation and gastric cancer risk in a high-risk Polish population. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:1866–1874. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chalitchagorn K, Shuangshoti S, Hourpai N, Kongruttanachok N, Tangkijvanich P, Thong-ngam D, Voravud N, Sriuranpong V, Mutirangura A. Distinctive pattern of LINE-1 methylation level in normal tissues and the association with carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2004;23:8841–8846. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smolarek I, Wyszko E, Barciszewska AM, Nowak S, Gawronska I, Jablecka A, Barciszewska MZ. Global DNA methylation changes in blood of patients with essential hypertension. Med Sci Monit. 2010;16:CR149–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Geli J, Kiss N, Karimi M, Lee JJ, Bäckdahl M, Ekström TJ, Larsson C. Global and Regional CpG Methylation in Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas: Association to Malignant Behavior. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2551–2559. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES