Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2014 Aug 12;4:6039. doi: 10.1038/srep06039

Chaotic oscillation and random-number generation based on nanoscale optical-energy transfer

Makoto Naruse 1,a, Song-Ju Kim 2, Masashi Aono 3,4, Hirokazu Hori 5, Motoichi Ohtsu 6
PMCID: PMC4129418  PMID: 25113239

Abstract

By using nanoscale energy-transfer dynamics and density matrix formalism, we demonstrate theoretically and numerically that chaotic oscillation and random-number generation occur in a nanoscale system. The physical system consists of a pair of quantum dots (QDs), with one QD smaller than the other, between which energy transfers via optical near-field interactions. When the system is pumped by continuous-wave radiation and incorporates a timing delay between two energy transfers within the system, it emits optical pulses. We refer to such QD pairs as nano-optical pulsers (NOPs). Irradiating an NOP with external periodic optical pulses causes the oscillating frequency of the NOP to synchronize with the external stimulus. We find that chaotic oscillation occurs in the NOP population when they are connected by an external time delay. Moreover, by evaluating the time-domain signals by statistical-test suites, we confirm that the signals are sufficiently random to qualify the system as a random-number generator (RNG). This study reveals that even relatively simple nanodevices that interact locally with each other through optical energy transfer at scales far below the wavelength of irradiating light can exhibit complex oscillatory dynamics. These findings are significant for applications such as ultrasmall RNGs.

Modern neuroscience currently considers that the complex interactions between spiking pulses in human brains are at the origin of intelligence1. It is clear that humans cannot live without the rhythmic patterns of signals or material flows such as the circadian rhythm2. Moreover, even relatively simple biological organisms such as single-celled amoeboid organisms (e.g., P. polycephalum) exhibit complex spatiotemporal dynamics including chaotic oscillatory dynamics3,4. This intriguing real-world observation raises the following question: What is the ultimate physical architecture in nature that exhibits complex pulsation dynamics?

To address this question, we use theory and numerical analysis to examine intriguing oscillatory dynamics that are based on optical-near-field-mediated energy transfer at a scale far below the wavelength of irradiating light. The insights obtained herein can help us understand the complex oscillatory phenomena observed in micro- and nanoscale engineering devices and natural biological organisms. Moreover, they can help the development of practical applications such as random-number generators5, which are critical in cryptography6 and computer simulations7, as well as in designing “nano intelligence”8,9,10.

Energy transfer based on optical near-field interactions between nanoscale materials has been thoroughly studied by fundamental theory11,12 as well as experiments13,14,15,16. Generating periodic optical pulses is one of the most important functions of digital systems17. To study the generation of optical pulses based on optical near-field processes in the subwavelength regime, Shojiguchi et al. theoretically investigated the generation of super-radiance in N two-level systems connected by optical near-field interactions18. By substantially simplifying Shojiguchi's architecture, Naruse et al. theoretically demonstrated optical pulsation in a system composed of two subsystems, each of which involved energy transfer from a smaller to a larger quantum dot (QD). The energy transfer occurs via optical near-field interactions and is driven by a continuous wave (cw) irradiation19, which results in the emission by the QD system of an optical pulse train. Thus, we refer to the QDs in this context as “nano-optical pulsers” (NOPs).

In many versatile systems in nature and in engineering devices and systems, synchronization and chaos are important phenomena connected to periodic signals20,21,22. For example, injection locking of lasers is of fundamental importance, and stability, instability, and chaos in such systems have been thoroughly studied from basic and practical perspectives21,23. In addition, rather than suppressing such chaotic behavior in lasers, the phenomenon can be exploited by applications that secure data communications24,25. In associated research, optical random-number generators (RNGs) were intensively investigated6,26, and chaos generated in quantum-dot microlasers with external feedback was also reported27.

However, these studies of synchronized, chaotic, and random oscillatory dynamics require far-field optics, which means that the devices and systems are constrained by the diffraction limit of light. This physical restriction means that macroscale devices are inherently required. In contrast, the present study focuses on nanoscale oscillatory dynamics, which are free from the diffraction limit imposed by optical far fields. By revealing the basic functions made possible by synchronization and chaos in near-field optics, we provide guiding design principles for future devices, systems and methods to evaluate their performance. Note that the pulsation, synchronization, and chaos, as discussed in this paper, are related to optical pulses for which the carrying frequencies are fixed, whereas the conventional literature on synchronization and chaos in lasers21 discusses the oscillation frequency of the radiation itself.

We now give a brief outline of the paper. Reference 19 discusses the combination of two energy transfers by near-field interactions, one of which is delayed with respect to the other. When pumped by cw irradiation, the system emits an optical pulse train. This phenomenon was explained using a density matrix formalism involving six energy levels. In our study, we first further simplify such a pulse-generating mechanism by replacing one of the energy-transfer paths by a delay function. This approach allows us to confirm the emission of a pulsed output. Second, we demonstrate that such an NOP can be synchronized with a periodic external signal. We show that the synchronization bandwidth depends on the intensity of the external stimulus and that the “sensitivity” (defined later) to the external stimulus increases for weaker cw excitation of the NOP. Third, we characterize bifurcations and chaos by combining NOPs with an external timing delay between energy transfers. Finally, by using security-test suites to evaluate the chaotic signals, we checked the randomness inherent in those signals to determine if such devices can be used as an RNG.

Uchida et al. experimentally demonstrated an RNG based on semiconductor lasers and achieved 1.7 Gb/s random-number generation6. The rate obtained was excellent and devices were developed on the basis of solid and sophisticated principles in the literature on optical communications. However, because these results are based on far-field optics, they suffer from a fundamental difficulty that they cannot be miniaturized beyond the diffraction limit of light28. NOPs, however, are based on energy transfer and thus are not diffraction limited. In addition, cw light sources, such as light-emitting diodes and lasers, have now been developed on the basis of principles of near-field optics29,30, which suggests that optical pulsation and RNGs can be implemented on the basis of nanophotonic principles and technologies.

Results

Nano-optical pulser based on energy transfer

Previous work presented a theory of a pulse-generating mechanism in a system of four QDs. This mechanism combines two energy-transfer pathways in which one pathway experiences a timing delay19. Here, we first introduce a simpler theory based on a pair of QDs, with one QD smaller than the other.

In the long-wavelength approximation, the electric-field operator is constant in the Hamiltonian, which describes the interaction between an electron and an electric field, because the electric field of the propagating light is considered to be uniform on the nanometer scale. For cubic QDs, optical selection rules prohibit transitions to states described by even quantum numbers. However, this restriction is relaxed when optical near fields are concerned because of the localized nature of optical near fields in the vicinity of nanoscale matter. Energy in QDs can be optically transferred to neighboring QDs via optical near-field interactions11. For instance, assume that two cubic quantum dots—QDS and QDL, where S and L refer to small and large, and whose side lengths are a and Inline graphic, respectively—are located close to each other, as shown in Fig. 1a. Also, suppose that the energy eigenvalues for the quantized exciton energy level specified by quantum numbers (nx, ny, nz) in QDS are given by

graphic file with name srep06039-m1.jpg

where EB is the energy of the bulk exciton and M is the effective mass of the exciton. A resonance exists between the energy level of QDS with quantum numbers (1,1,1) (denoted as S1 in Fig. 1a) and that of QDL with quantum numbers (2,1,1) (denoted as L2 in Fig. 1a). Because of the steep localized electric field in the vicinity of QDS and QDL, an optical near-field interaction occurs between the two QDs. This interaction is denoted by U in Fig. 1a, and the steep electric field is schematically indicated by the orange triangle. Therefore, energy in S1 can be optically transferred to L2 and vice versa. Normally, such a transition would be dipole forbidden because L2 has an even quantum number. This means that diffraction-limited far-field light irradiation from external systems can couple only to S131. In QDL, optical-energy dissipation, described by Γ is faster than the near-field interaction, so the optical energy deposited into the (2,1,1) level can relax to the (1,1,1) level of QDL (denoted by L1).

Figure 1. Nanoscale optical pulser architecture.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Optical excitation transfer via near-field interactions between closely located smaller and larger quantum dots (QDs). (b) Example of optical excitation transfer from a smaller to a larger QD. (c) By incorporating a time delay, optical pulsation becomes possible. (d) Example of optical pulses induced by cw optical excitation. (e) Peak-to-peak value of pulsed population as a function of cw excitation amplitude.

Similar optical-excitation transfer via near-field interactions has been reported for various material systems, including CuCl QDs11, InAs QDs32, CdSe QDs33, and hybrid systems13,14. Also, the theoretical foundations describing such phenomena, including the optimal near-field interaction that maximizes optical excitation transfer, have been developed by Sangu et al. in Ref. [11]. Because the primary focus of the present study is to investigate the possibility of synchronization, chaos, and random-number generation based on optical excitation transfer, we do not assume a particular implementation, as explained in the discussion section. In this study, based on experimental observations of energy transfer in ZnO nanorods34, we assume a sublevel relaxation Γ−1 = 10 ps and radiative decay times for QDS and QDL of Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively, which are typical values for these parameters. The optical near-field interaction is given by U−1 = 120 ps. As shown in Fig. 1b, these parameter values lead to an evolution of populations involving the energy level L1, assuming an initial excitation at S1. These results clearly indicate that optical excitation transfer occurs from S1 to L1.

When the lower level of QDL (L1) is occupied, the optical excitation in QDS cannot transfer to that level in QDL because of the state-filling effect11. Optical pulsation based on optical energy transfer forms because of the architecture, where the state filling in L1 is triggered by the radiation from S1 with a delay with respect to the energy transfer from L1, as shown schematically in Fig. 1c. If QDS is irradiated with cw radiation, such triggers should occur periodically and continuously at constant intervals. In other words, a pulsed signal should result.

We describe the above dynamics by using a density matrix formalism. The radiative relaxation rates from S1 and L1 are denoted as γS and γL, respectively. The quantum master equation is35

graphic file with name srep06039-m2.jpg

where Hint represents the interaction Hamiltonian. Matrices Ri (i = S,L) are annihilation operators, which annihilate excitations in S1 and L1, respectively, via radiative relaxations. Matrices Inline graphic (i = S,L) are creation operators given by transposes of matrices Ri. The matrix S is an annihilation operator that annihilates the excitation in L2 via sublevel relaxations. The external Hamiltonian Inline graphic represents the external cw optical excitation that populates the energy level S1 of QDS. This Hamiltonian is given by

graphic file with name srep06039-m3.jpg

where CW specifies the amplitude of the external cw radiation. The other external Hamiltonian HΔ(t) represents radiation from the lower-energy level of QDS, which affects the lower-energy level of QDL or L2 with a delay Δ. The Hamiltonian is given by

graphic file with name srep06039-m4.jpg

where Inline graphic indicates the population of energy level S1 and α indicates the coupling efficiency. In the original theory of the pulse-generating mechanism19, the delay line was represented by a different QD combination, giving another density matrix, and the overall dynamics was analyzed by solving the system of equations. In our simplified system, the delay is incorporated into Eq. (4).

In addition to the typical parameter values based on ZnO nanorods34 introduced earlier, the coupling efficiency α is assumed to be 0.1, and the cw input amplitude is CW = 0.0007. Figure 1d shows the dynamics of the population of the lower level of QDL (L1) when the interdot optical near-field interaction U−1 = 120 ps and Δ = 1000 ps. The population dynamics become pulsed, so we use this model for the following discussion. The period of the oscillating population is approximately 2849 ps, which gives a pulse frequency of approximately 351 MHz.

As reported in Ref. 19, no pulse train occurs for a cw excitation that is either too intense or too weak. Figure 1e shows the peak-to-peak population as a function of the cw input amplitude. Pulses occur for a cw input amplitude between approximately 0.0003 and 0.002.

Synchronization in nano-optics

We now consider irradiating the NOP with periodic external radiation, as shown schematically in Fig. 2a, and investigate whether synchronization is induced in the system. Consider the system subjected to an external periodic stimulus given by a sinusoidal perturbation:

graphic file with name srep06039-m5.jpg

where A and T are the amplitude and period of the periodic signal, respectively. By adding the Hamiltonian represented by Eq. (5) to Eq. (2), synchronization is characterized by solving

graphic file with name srep06039-m6.jpg

Let the parameters associated with the NOP be the same as those for the previous discussion. Let the period of the external signal be given by T = 3500 ps (or approximately 286 MHz) and A = 0.0001. The dashed and solid curves in Fig. 2b show the evolution of the population associated with the energy level L1 with and without an external input. The oscillation period is synchronized with the input signal.

Figure 2. Synchronization in NOP.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic of system where NOP is subjected to external periodic signal. (b) Evolution of population with and without external input. (c) Synchronization of NOP to external input radiation. The bandwidth of the frequency locking increases with the amplitude of the external input. (d) Analysis of sensitivity of synchronization. Synchronization of weakly excited NOP is more sensitive to external input.

While maintaining the parameters associated with the NOP, Fig. 2c characterizes synchronization, or more specifically, the frequency of the external periodic signal that maximizes the spectral peak of the output signal. The dashed curve shows that the oscillating frequency is equal to the frequency of the external signal when the latter is between 244 and 500 MHz. For frequencies outside this locking range, the oscillating frequency is approximately 366 MHz, which is nearly equal to the oscillating frequency of the original NOP exposed to a cw input amplitude of 0.0008. This is consistent with the fact that the system is irradiated with cw radiation (0.0007) in addition to a periodic signal with amplitude 0.0001.

The locking range depends on the amplitude of the external irradiation. The solid, dot-dashed, and dotted curves in Fig. 2c indicate the locking range of synchronization for external irradiation amplitudes A of 0.0015, 0.0012, and 0.0008. The larger the amplitude of the external signal, the larger the bandwidth of synchronization. This property is similar to the mode-locking phenomenon observed in conventional lasers21 and other systems such as phase-locked loops36. Furthermore, we find that an external stimulus with excessively large amplitude does not lead to synchronization; rather, the system is overwhelmed by optical energy and enters a static state.

Figure 2d considers the case in which the amplitude of the external periodic signal is maintained (A = 0.0001). Based on the results shown in Fig. 2d, we investigate the sensitivity of the NOP to the external system by changing the amplitude of the original cw pumping light. Recall that the locking range is between 244 and 500 MHz for CW = 0.0007 and an external periodic signal amplitude of 0.0001, respectively. The circles in Fig. 2d show the maximum spectrum obtained when the NOP is exposed to an external input divided by the maximum spectrum of the original pulser without the external input. We refer to this ratio as sensitivity, which is larger in the locking range. Moreover, it increases with decreasing cw-excitation power (CW = 0.0006), as indicated by the squares in Fig. 2d. In contrast, as shown by the triangles in Fig. 2d, greater cw excitation power (CW = 0.0008) leads to a decrease in sensitivity. Such properties are also similar to those of conventional mode-locked lasers and are referred to as the dependence on relative excitation37.

These results clearly imply that the physics of near-field optical systems can lead to synchronized phenomena.

Chaos in nano-optics

Lasers are known to undergo chaotic oscillation when connected with a delayed feedback21,23. Here, we address the question of whether chaos is possible in the subwavelength regime. In other words, we investigate the possibility of chaos evolving from nanoscale optical-energy transfer.

When an external delay line is added to the original NOP system, as shown schematically in Fig. 3a, the overall dynamics are described by solving

graphic file with name srep06039-m7.jpg

where the lower energy level L2 of QDL is fed back to the same energy level after time delay Δ. This effect is taken into account by adding the following external Hamiltonian to the original master equation:

graphic file with name srep06039-m8.jpg

where αC and ΔC are the coupling constant and timing delay, respectively. The quantity Inline graphic is the population of L1.

Figure 3. Chaos in nano optical pulser.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic of system where NOP is connected with external delay. (b) Evolution of population with four different parameters: (i) Periodic signal occurs. (ii) and (iii) Rather complex trains occur. (iv) Population is saturated at a certain level. (c) Local maxima and minima of populations as a function of control parameter αC.

Parameter values for the systems are based on experimental observations from ZnO nanorods28: Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Γ−1 = 10 ps, Δ = 3000 ps, α = 0.1, and U−1 = 100 ps. Figure 3b considers the situation in which delay lines with ΔC = 1000 ps are incorporated. Figure 3b shows populations when the coupling constant αC is 0.001, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.05 (see Fig. 3b-i, 3b-ii, 3b-iii, and 3b-iv, respectively). Case (i) exhibits a periodic signal, whereas case (iv) converges to a constant population. Cases (ii) and (iii) exhibit more complicated dynamics.

To quantitatively characterize the dynamics, we evaluate the local maxima and minima of populations as a function of the coupling constant αC. When the population dynamics is periodic or constant, there is no diversity in the local maxima and minima, whereas the maxima and minima take on a variety of values when the signal is chaotic21, which leads to bifurcations and chaos in signal trains.

The circles and crosses in Fig. 3c show the local maxima and minima, respectively, in the population between 500 000 and 1 000 001 ps. For αC between 0.001 and approximately 0. 0025, the variation in local maxima and minima is limited, whereas for αC = 0.0025, the variation is greater. From αC >~ 0.0025 to nearly 0.009, the variation is again limited, whereas from approximately 0.009 to 0.0228, the variation increases again. Beyond αC = 0.0228, the local maxima and minima have similar values, so no oscillations occur. These results indicate that a system based on optical energy transfer exhibits bifurcation and chaotic behavior, which is evidence of chaos.

Another criterion satisfied by chaos is expressed by the maximal Lyapunov exponent (MLE)22,23. Suppose that a trajectory exhibits chaotic behavior, which means that the final difference between two trajectories with a subtle initial difference δZ0 grows exponentially. In other words, Inline graphic. The MLE is defined by

graphic file with name srep06039-m9.jpg

where λ ≤ 0 indicates no chaos20,22. We used the FET1 code developed by Wolf et al.38 to estimate the MLE from a time series. Figure 4a shows the calculated MLE as a function of the control parameter αC. The results show that, for instance, λ is positive for 0.0148 < αC < 0.0225. This particular range coincides with the range over which chaos occurs in the local maxima and minima (Fig. 3b). Also, for the 78 points in this particular regime, there are 26 points that satisfy the random-number conditions discussed below. This result clearly indicates that the physics of near-field optics allows for chaotic phenomena.

Figure 4. Chaos and random-number generation in nanosized system.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Lyapunov exponents as a function of control parameter αC. We used the following FET1 parameters, dimension = 7, delay = 10, evolve = 1, Scalemin = 10−5, and Scalemax = 0.7. The Lyapunov exponent λ ≤ 0 indicates no chaos. The dotted line shows λ = 0 (b) Analysis of properties of random numbers based on the improved FIPS test. (c) Schematic of cases that pass the improved FIPS test. For all 35 cases that pass the improved FIPS test, the corresponding Lyapunov exponent is positive [see panel (a)].

Random-number generation by nano-optics

Finally, to determine if NOPs can be used as RNGs, we use statistical-test suites to evaluate the randomness inherent in the chaotic dynamics of populations. Many well-known statistical-test suites, such as NIST 800-2239,40, FIPS 140-241,42, and Diehard43, are proposed in the literature. We use the FIPS 140-2 statistical-test suite (hereafter the “FIPS test”) because it is the most simple and user-friendly test suite. It offers the following four basic tests: (i) the monobit test, (ii) porker test, (iii) run test, and (iv) long-run test. Because of its simplicity, it has been used to supplement RNGs in many hardware implementations44,45.

Kim et al. recalculated the requirement of the FIPS test for a 2500-bit sequence to give an identical significance level α = 10−2, which is a commonly used value in cryptography. This significance level is defined as the probability of a false rejection of the null hypothesis in a statistical test. In other words, it is the probability that a perfect RNG generates a “failure” sequence. A summary of the “improved FIPS test”, which we use in the analysis, is available in the supplementary information, and further details may be found in Refs. [46] and [47].

We obtained temporal signals from t = 0 to t = 1 000 000 for each member of the population with a resolution of 1 ps. The population at each time increment is converted to a 16-bit-precision fixed-point number and the lowest significant bit is used for a binary value. In other words, 1 000 001 binary bits are obtained from a single run. Ignoring the initial time range from t = 0 to 100 000, the total length is reduced to 900 000 bits. The signals are then divided into increments of 2500 (i.e., 2500 ps duration); the number of 2500-bit binary-signal sets is 36. By subjecting all 36 sets to the improved FIPS test described above, we can determine whether they qualify as random numbers. If all bit sets pass the test or if the number of failures is at most two for each test, then the answer is yes. Two failures are deemed acceptable in this particular case because the acceptable interval is determined to be in the 99.73% range of normal distribution. For details, see section 4.2.1 of Ref. [39].

The solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves in Fig. 4b show the frequency of the FIPS-test failure for the monobit, poker, run, and long-run tests, respectively, as a function of the control parameter αC. The FIPS test is passed in a total of 35 cases, which used the following control parameters: 0.0058, 0.0061, 0.0076, 0.0084, 0.0104, 0.0106, 0.0108, 0.0116, 0.0124, 0.0172, 0.0175, 0.0177–0.0180, 0.0181, 0.0183, 0.0185, 0.0187, 0.0190, 0.0192, 0.0194–0.0196, 0.0198–0.0200, 0.0202, 0.0204–0.0207, and 0.0212–0.0214. The evaluation was based on an αC interval of 10−3, as shown in Fig. 4c. Moreover, for all control parameters for which the improved FIPS test was passed, the corresponding MLEs are positive (see Fig. 4a).

The chaotic signal behaves differently depending on other parameters. Focusing on the external delay, which plays a crucial role in generating chaos, Fig. 5 characterizes the pass–no-pass results of the FIPS test for time delay ΔC ranging from 0 to 3000 ps. The number of cases that pass the FIPS test is given on the right side of Fig. 5 (where ΔC = 200 ps yields the maximum number of cases that pass the FIPS test). From this analysis, we conclude that chaotic phenomena based on near-field local optical interactions can form the basis of ultrasmall RNGs.

Figure 5. Distributions of cases that pass the improved FIPS test.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The randomness observed in output populations depends on the external delay ΔC and control parameter αC. The squares at the right give the number of case that pass the improved FIPS test as a function of external delay.

Discussion

As mentioned in the introduction, complex oscillatory dynamics are observed in various systems in the real world. Our study indicates that local nanoscale interactions may lead to synchronization, chaos, and even random-number generation. The optical near-field interactions examined in this study contain the “necessary conditions” required for generating complex oscillatory dynamics; that is, nanoscale optical near-field interactions generate physical properties that are functionally equivalent to those observed in other physical systems exhibiting complex dynamics. Moreover, using the optical near field yields the additional benefit of overcoming the diffraction limit of light.

However, several important unresolved issues remain that complicate the science of near-field optics. The function of delay, in particular, needs more study, both theoretically and experimentally. Optical excitation transfer depends on the architecture of nanostructures as well as on the population of energy levels therein. For example, in Ref. 48, Naruse et al. discusses topology-dependent, autonomous optical excitation transfer, and how an excitation “waits” in a multi-quantum-dot system. In addition, the coupling between semiconductor quantum dots and nanocavities has been intensively studied49,50,51. These investigations are analogous to the present work in that they consider how to realize further functionalities by using near-field optics, but we need to be careful because the notion of “cavity” implies diffraction-limited macroscale entities. We will thus conduct further investigations into the theoretical foundation of delay in near-field optics. Experimentally, on the other hand, Nomura et al. demonstrated a chain of colloidal CdSe QDs52. Also, QD arrangements of graded size have been demonstrated by Kawazoe et al.53 and Franzl et al.54, which could provide the basic resources to implement delay functions19. To fabricate devices in the future, fluctuations in size, layout, etc., in the quantum nanostructure may be of concern, and tolerance and robustness would need to be clarified. A step in this direction has already been taken by Naruse et al., who built a stochastic model to systematically characterize optical excitation transfer in multilayer InAs QDs formed by molecular beam epitaxy55.

Other unique optical near-field processes can be considered. For example, the hierarchical properties of the optical near field means that near-field interactions behave differently depending on the length scale involved56. This property is notably different from that encountered in conventional optics and photonics. Another interesting topic is the impact of the hierarchical properties of optical near fields on synchronization and chaos. As techniques to fabricate nanophotonic devices continue to be developed, experimental verification and fabrication of practical devices are important routes for future work13,14,15,16,29,30,34,55.

Author Contributions

M.N. and S.-J.K. directed the project; M.N. and S.-J.K. designed systems; M.N. and S.-J.K. analyzed the data; M.A., H.H. and M.O. discussed physical modeling; M.N. and S.-J.K. wrote the paper.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep06039-s1.doc (45.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced Research Networks from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

  1. Brown E. N., Kass R. E. & Mitra P. P. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 456–61 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Takahashi J. S. & Zatz M. Regulation of circadian rhythmicity. Science 217, 1104–1111 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aono M., Hirata Y., Hara M. & Aihara K. Amoeba-based chaotic neurocomputing: combinatorial optimization by coupled biological oscillators. New Generation Comput. 27, 129–157 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. Hirata Y., Aono M., Hara M. & Aihara K. Spontaneous mode switching in coupled oscillators competing for constant amounts of resources. Chaos 20, 013117 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knuth D. The Art of Computer Programming. (Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  6. Uchida A. et al. Fast physical random bit generation with chaotic semiconductor lasers. Nat. Photonics 2, 728–732 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  7. Meteopolis N. & Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44, 335–341 (1949). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Naruse M. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics in optical energy transfer on the nanoscale and its application to constraint satisfaction problems. Phys. Rev. B 86, 125407 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  9. Aono M. et al. Amoeba-inspired nanoarchitectonic computing: solving intractable computational problems using nanoscale photoexcitation transfer dynamics. Langmuir 29, 7557–7564 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim S.-J., Naruse M., Aono M., Ohtsu M. & Hara M. Decision maker based on nanoscale photo-excitation transfer. Sci. Rep. 3, 2370 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sangu S., Kobayashi K., Shojiguchi A., Kawazoe T. & Ohtsu M. Excitation energy transfer and population dynamics in a quantum dot system induced by optical near-field interaction. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 2937 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zurita-Sánchez J. R. & Novotny L. Multipolar interband absorption in a semiconductor quantum dot. I. Electric quadrupole enhancement. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 1355–1362 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  13. Cox J. D., Singh M. R., Gumbs G., Anton M. A. & Carreno F. Dipole-dipole interaction between a quantum dot and a graphene nanodisk. Phys. Rev. B 86, 125452 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Racknor C., Singh M. R., Zhang Y., Birch D. J. S. & Chen Y. Methods, energy transfer between a biological labeling dye and gold nanorods. Appl. Fluoresc. 2, 015002 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Naruse M., Tate N., Aono M. & Ohtsu M. Information physics fundamentals of nanophotonics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056401 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pistol C., Dwyer C. & Lebeck A. R. Nanoscale optical computing using resonance energy transfer logic. IEEE Micro 28, 7–18 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  17. Haykin S. Communication Systems. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  18. Shojiguchi A., Kobayashi K., Sangu S., Kitahara K. & Ohtsu M. Superradiance and dipole ordering of an N two-level system interacting with optical near fields. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, 2984–3001 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  19. Naruse M., Hori H., Kobayashi K., Kawazoe T. & Ohtsu M. Optical pulsation mechanism based on optical near-field interactions. Appl. Phys. B 102, 717–723 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. Cencini M., Cecconi F. & Vulpiani A. Chaos from simple models to complex systems. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  21. Ohtsubo J. Semiconductor Lasers, Stability, Instability and Chaos. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. Uchida A. Optical Communication with Chaotic Lasers. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Haken H. Light, Volume 2 Laser Light Dynamics. (North-Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam, 1985). [Google Scholar]
  24. VanWiggeren G. D. & Roy R. Communication with chaotic lasers. Science 279, 1198–1200 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Argyris A. et al. Chaos-based communications at high bit rates using commercial fibre-optic links. Nature 438, 343–346 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kanter I., Aviad Y., Reidler I., Cohen E. & Rosenbluh M. An optical ultrafast random bit generator. Nat. Photonics 4, 58–61 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  27. Albert F. et al. Observing chaos for quantum-dot microlasers with external feedback. Nat. Commun. 2, 366 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ohtsu M. & Hori H. Near-Field Nano-Optics. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, New York, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  29. Kawazoe T., Mueed M. A. & Ohtsu M. Highly efficient and broadband Si homojunction structured near-infrared light emitting diodes based on the phonon-assisted optical near-field process. Appl. Phys. B 104, 747–754 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. Kawazoe T., Ohtsu M., Akahane K. & Yamamoto N. Si homojunction structured near-infrared laser based on a phonon-assisted process. Appl. Phys. B 107, 659–663 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  31. Naruse M., Kawazoe T., Sangu S., Kobayashi K. & Ohtsu M. Optical interconnects based on optical far- and near-field interactions for high-density data broadcasting. Opt. Express. 14, 306–313 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Akahane K. et al. Energy transfer in multi-stacked InAs quantum dots. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 04DH05 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  33. Somers R. C., Snee P. T., Bawendi M. G. & Nocera D. G. Energy transfer of CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals encapsulated with rhodamine-dye functionalized poly(acrylic acid). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 248, 24 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yatsui T., Jeong H. & Ohtsu M. Controlling the energy transfer between near-field optically coupled ZnO quantum dots. Appl. Phys. B 93, 199–202 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  35. Carmichael H. J. Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  36. Li P., Silveira L. M. & Feldmann P. (eds.) Simulation and Verification of Electronic and Biological Systems. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  37. Lang R. Injection locking properties of a semiconductor laser. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 18, 976–983 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolf A., Swift J. B., Swinney H. L. & Vastano J. A. Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physica D 16, 285–317 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  39. Ruhin A. et al. A Statistical Test Suite for Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications. Computer Security National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/rng/documents/SP800-22rev1a.pdf, (2010) (Date of access:2/7/2014). [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim S.-J., Umeno K. & Hasegawa A. Corrections of the NIST statistical test suite for randomness. Cryptography ePrint Archive 2004/018 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  41. FIPS PUB 140-2. Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules. U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips140-2/fips1402.pdf, (2001) (Date of access:2/7/2014).
  42. Kim S.-J., Umeno K. & Hasegawa A. FIPS 140-2 statistical test suite has inappropriate significance levels. ISM Report on Research and Education 17, 326–327 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  43. The Marsaglia Random Number CDROM including the Diehard Battery of Tests of Randomness. http://stat.fsu.edu/pub/diehard/, (1995) (Date of access:2/7/2014).
  44. Hasegawa A., Kim S.-J. & Umeno K. IP core of statistical test suite of FIPS PUB 140-2. Proc. of IP Based SoC Design 2003, 111–114 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee J. S., Choi P., Kim S.-J., Choi B. D. & Kim D. K. Built-in hardware random number test module for physical unclonable functions. NOLTA 5, 101–112 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  46. Ikezoe Y., Kim S.-J., Yamashita I. & Hara M. Random number generation for two-dimensional crystal of protein molecules. Langmuir 25, 4293–4297 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ikezoe Y., Kim S.-J., Kim D., Lee S. B. & Hara M. Nanoscale shuffling in a template-assisted self-assembly of binary colloidal particles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechno. 12, 2934–2938 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Naruse M. et al. Autonomy in excitation transfer via optical near-field interactions and its implications for information networking. Nano Commun. Net. 2, 189–195 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  49. Reitzenstein S. et al. Coherent photonic coupling of semiconductor quantum dots. Opt. Lett. 31, 1738–1740 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Laucht A. et al. Mutual coupling of two semiconductor quantum dots via an optical nanocavity. Phys. Rev. B 82, 075305 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  51. Albert F. et al. Microcavity controlled coupling of excitonic qubits. Nat. Commun. 4, 1747 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nomura W., Yatsui T., Kawazoe T., Naruse M. & Ohtsu M. Structural dependency of optical excitation transfer via optical near-field interactions between semiconductor quantum dots. Appl. Phys. B 100, 181 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  53. Kawazoe T., Kobayashi K. & Ohtsu M. Optical nanofountain: A biomimetic device that concentrates optical energy in a nanometric region. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 103102 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  54. Franzl T., Klar T. A., Schietinger S., Rogach A. L. & Feldmann J. Exciton recycling in graded gap nanocrystal structures. Nano Lett. 4, 1599 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  55. Naruse M. et al. Analysis of optical near-field energy transfer by stochastic model unifying architectural dependencies. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 154306 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  56. Naruse M., Inoue T. & Hori H. Analysis and synthesis of hierarchy in optical near-field interactions at the nanoscale based on angular spectrum. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 6095–6103 (2007). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep06039-s1.doc (45.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES