Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014 Jun 18;24(16):4023–4025. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.06.009

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 2,3′-Diindolylmethanes as Agonists of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor

Gabrielle N Winston-McPherson a, Dongxu Shu a,b, Weiping Tang a,b
PMCID: PMC4130779  NIHMSID: NIHMS607266  PMID: 24997686

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) may be a target for a number of diseases. Natural product malassezin is a AhR agonist with an interesting 2,3′-diindolylmethane skeleton. We have prepared a series of analogues of natural product malassezin using our recently developed method and tested the activity of these analogues against AhR in a cell-based assay. We found that a methyl substituent at 1′-N can significantly increase the activity and the 2-formyl group is not critical for some diindolylmethanes.

Keywords: AhR, diindolylmethane, agonist, indole, transcription factor


The arylhrydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor that is well conserved across many species.1 AhR readily binds to various endogenous and xenobiotic polyaromatic heterocycles.2 It is perhaps best known for its role in conferring the toxicity of environmental pollutant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD or dioxin) 1 (Figure 1).3 AhR binds to TCDD with remarkably high affinity and upon binding, the ligand-receptor complex travels to the nucleus where AhR then dimerizes with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor translocator (ARNT).4 It is this active dimer that functions to promote or repress the transcription of a multitude of different genes, most notably CYP1A1.5 AhR activation is highly regulated by a negative feedback mechanism to prevent continuous signaling.6 It is believed that prolonged AhR signaling is very unfavorable.7 Therefore, it has been proposed that the toxicity of dioxin is due to its exceptionally long metabolic stability (half-life of 7–10 years in human),3 resulting in a continuously activated AhR.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative Synthetic and Natural AhR Agonists

The physiological role of AhR has been a long sought problem.23 Recent data showed that AhR was involved in many important biological processes such as immune cell differentiation,8 intestinal function,9 and development of prostate.10 It has been postulated that AhR may be a potential target for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia,11 reduction of undesired immune responses during organ transplantation,12 inflammation disorders,13 and certain types of cancer.14 Peterson and Safe reported that synthetic AhR agonist 6-methyl-1,3,8-trichlorodibenzofuran (MCDF) 2 blocked vascular endothelial growth factor in prostate and conferred protection against prostate cancer in vivo.15 Safe also showed that a variety of substituted 3,3′-diindolylmethanes (DIMs) 3, which are also AhR agonists, inhibit tumor growth in rat models.16 Natural products indolo[3,2-b]carbazole (ICZ) 4, 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ) 5, and malassezin 6 have been demonstrated to be agonists of AhR. Both ICZ and FICZ are categorized as indolocarbazoles,17 while malassezin18 is a formylated 2,3′-diindolylmethane.19 Recent studies suggested that FICZ had anti-asthmatic effects by inhibiting Th2 cytokine production in a mouse model.20 Herein we report our efforts towards the development of selective AhR modulators by preparing an assortment of 2,3′-diindolylmethanes.

We have recently reported a platinum-catalyzed indole annulation/arylation cascade reaction for the synthesis of diindolylmethane 9 from propargylic ether 7 (Scheme 1) and demonstrated its utility in the total synthesis of natural product malassezin.21 Based on this method, we prepared a collection of malassezin analogues 10 and 11 following the sequence in Scheme 1. After the formation of 9 using the previously established indole annulation/arylation protocol, we cleaved the Boc-group under thermal conditions to produce diindolylmethanes 10, which were then treated with POCl3 and DMF to give the formylated malassezin analogues 11.18,21

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of 2,3′-Diindolylmethanes

We next turned our attention to the investigation of the bioactivity of malassezin analogues. We employed the well-documented ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) assay to determine the EC50 values of our compounds towards AhR activation in HepG2 cells.22 This assay measures the induction of cytochrome P450-1A1 (CYP1A1), which is a major outcome of AhR activation.23 CYP1A1 selectively converts 7-ethoxyresorufin to a fluorescent product resorufin.

Malassezin was served as the positive control (Table 1). The EC50 values of our malassezin analogues varied quite dramatically depending on their respective substitution pattern. For the halogenated 2,3′-diindolylmethanes 11a–c, 5′-chlorination resulted in a compound (11a) more potent than the positive control, while 7′-chlorination gave a slightly weaker agonist (11b). Compound 11c, with a methoxy substitution on the 5′-position, behaved similarly to malassezin. Interestingly, compound 11d with an N-methyl group on the 1′-position was surprisingly potent; its EC50 value was about five times lower than that of malassezin.

Table 1.

AhR Activity of Diindolylmethanes

Compounds EC50 (μM)
6 graphic file with name nihms607266t1.jpg 0.27 ± 0.1
11a graphic file with name nihms607266t2.jpg 0.093 ± 0.15
11b graphic file with name nihms607266t3.jpg 0.32 ± 0.1
11c graphic file with name nihms607266t4.jpg 0.23 ± 0.1
11d graphic file with name nihms607266t5.jpg 0.055 ± 0.03
6 graphic file with name nihms607266t6.jpg 0.215 ± 0.46
10a graphic file with name nihms607266t7.jpg > 6.7
10c graphic file with name nihms607266t8.jpg 0.094 ± 0.27
10d graphic file with name nihms607266t9.jpg 0.086 ± 0.04

We then investigated the importance of the formyl group in malassezin analogues for AhR activation. In the case of compound pair 10a/11a, the formyl group contributed significantly to the potency of 11a. In contrast, other non-formylated compounds including 6′, 10c, and 10d have similar potency as their formylated counterparts (6, 11c, and 11d).

Up to 12 fold increase of signal over DMSO treatment was observed for many of the malassezing analogues. Even at 10 nM concentration, compounds 11a and 11d could induce 5 and 6 fold increase of signals, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fold increase of signals (Y-axis) for compounds 6, 11a, 11d over DMSO negative control at 10nM.

In summary, we have synthesized a collection of novel analogues of the natural product malassezin and investigated their bioactivity in an EROD assay. It was found that some of these compounds were more potent than the parent malassezin and may become lead compounds for further diseases-relevant studies.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

We thank the NIH (R01GM088285) and the University of Wisconsin for financial support. We also thank the University of Wisconsin-Madison Small Molecule Screening and Synthesis Facility (SMSSF) for their assistance with the EROD assay.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES