Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Research Notes logoLink to BMC Research Notes
. 2014 Aug 7;7:499. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-499

Biofilm and fluoroquinolone resistance of canine Escherichia coli uropathogenic isolates

Manuela Oliveira 1,✉, Filipa Rocha Dias 1, Constança Pomba 1
PMCID: PMC4132243  PMID: 25099929

Abstract

Background

Escherichia coli is the most common uropathogen involved in urinary tract infection (UTI). Virulence of strains may differ, and may be enhanced by antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation, resulting in increased morbidity and recurrent infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro biofilm forming capacity of E. coli isolates from dogs with UTI, by using fluorescent in situ hybridization, and its association with virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance.

Findings

The proportion of biofilm-producing isolates significantly increased with the length of incubation time (P < 0.05). Biofilm production was significantly associated with fluoroquinolone resistance at all incubation time points and was independent of the media used (P < 0.05). Biofilm production was not associated with cnf1, hly, pap and sfa genes (P > 0.05), but was significantly associated with afa, aer and the β-lactamase genes (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing significant association between biofilm production and fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli isolates from dogs with UTI. Biofilm formation may contribute to UTI treatment failure in dogs, through the development of bacterial reservoirs inside bladder cells, allowing them to overcome host immune defenses and to establish recurrent infections.

Keywords: Biofilm, Dogs, Escherichia coli, Fluoroquinolone resistance, Urinary tract infection

Findings

Escherichia coli is the most common uropathogen in urinary tract infections (UTI) of humans and animals, being responsible for high morbidity and increased health care costs [1-3]. These infections are usually considered acute and self-limiting, but recurrent clinical signs are often observed [3]. E. coli UTI pathogenesis is similar in dogs and humans, and dogs may serve as reservoirs of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) strains that can be transmitted to humans and other animals [2,4]. In fact, the human highly virulent O25:ST131 uropathogenic clone was recently found in a dog with chronic cystitis [5,6]. This fact suggests a possible human-to-animal transmission.

In humans, it is well established that UPEC are able to form biofilm structures within the bladder, forming bacterial reservoirs that allow infection persistence [7-10]. These structures are highly organized multicelular complexes, characterised by adherent colonies surrounded by a large exopolysaccharide matrix. Biofilm structures protect bacteria against high antimicrobial concentrations and phagocytosis, allowing their survival in hostile environments within the host [10]. Detection of biofilm-producer strains is therefore relevant for the design of adequate control measures for UPEC infections. Fluoroquinolones are extensively used for UTI treatment, due to the high concentration levels reached in the urinary tract and good tissue concentrations [11]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro biofilm-forming ability of E. coli isolates from dog urinary tract infections, and its association with virulence and β- lactamase antimicrobial resistance genes, and with 2nd generation quinolones resistance.

Sixty-six E. coli isolates were used, from a collection of bacterial isolates from dogs with UTI belonging to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon. Isolates virulence factors had already been determined by multiplex PCR and described by us: 57.6% (n = 38) were positive for S fimbriae gene sfa; 1.5% (n = 1) for afimbrial adhesion I gene afaI; 42.4% (n = 28) for haemolysin gene hly; 40.9% (n = 27) for cytotoxic necrotizing factor I gene cnfI; 34.8% (n = 23) for aerobactin gene aer; and 42.4% (n = 28) for pyelonephritis-associated pili gene pap[12]. Detection of genes related with β-lactamase resistance has also been previously described by us: 19 isolates were positive for blaTEM (28.8%), three for blaSHV (4.5%), two for blaOXA-1 (3.0%) and six for ampC (9.1%) [13].

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ciprofloxacin (CIP, Laboratório Atral-Cipan, Portugal), enrofloxacin (ENR, Bayer, Germany), marbofloxacin (MAR, Vétoquinol, France) and orbifloxacin (OBX, Schering-Plough, USA) were determined by broth microdilution, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [14,15]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a reference control for MIC testing. Dilution range for all antimicrobial compounds tested was from 256 to 0.00003 μg/mL.

Biofilm production was tested by fluorescent in situ hybridization, as previously described [16], in two broth media, TSB (Tryptic Soy Broth, Oxoid, CM0129B) and BHIB (Brain Heart Infusion Broth, Oxoid, CM0225), using the universal bacterial probe, Eub338, labelled with fluorescein (Stabvida, Portugal). Wilcoxon signed ranks test was applied for statistical purposes.

From the 66 UPEC dog isolates evaluated, 31 isolates were biofilm-positive in BHIB at 24 hours, 51 at 48 hours, and 59 at 72 hours. In TSB, a higher number of biofilm-producing isolates was observed at all incubation times: 35 isolates at 24 hours; 52 at 48 hours; 62 at 72 hours.

No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between biofilm formation in the two culture media, but significant differences were found between biofilm production between 24 and 48 hours, 48 and 72 hours, and 24 and 72 hours (P < 0.05).

Association between biofilm formation in TSB at 24 hours and the presence of cnf1, hly, pap and sfa was not significant (P > 0.05), whilst there was a significant association between biofilm and afa and aer (P < 0.05) (Table 1). Biofilm production was also associated to the presence of the β-lactamase genes blaTEM, blaOXA-1,blaSHV and ampC (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Biofilm production and virulence and β-lactamase genes presence in 66 E. coli isolates from dogs with urinary infections a

 
 Biofilm production
 Virulence genes
 Multiplex-PCR
Isolate TSB, 24 hours pap sfa afa hly cnf1 aer TEM SHV OXA AMP C CTX-M
5
 Negative
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
13
 Negative
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
21
 Negative
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
34
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
36
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
43
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
78
 Positive
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
84
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
88
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
91
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
95
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
99
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
109
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
115
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
125
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
128
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
133
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
134
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
138
 Positive
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
174
 Negative
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
179
 Negative
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
188
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
194
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
207
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
209
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
224
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
226
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
227
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
237
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 +
 -
 +
 -
238
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 +
 -
 +
 -
239
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 +
 -
 +
 -
250
 Negative
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
251
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
257
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
258
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
271
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
274
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
291
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
304
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
320
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
325
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
327
 Positive
 +
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
347
 Negative
 -
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
354
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
372
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
374
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
386
 Positive
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
401
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
403
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
417
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
443
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
449
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
457
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
461
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
483
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
488
 Negative
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
505
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
528
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
531
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
536
 Positive
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
539
 Positive
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
540
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
553
 Negative
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 +
 -
554
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
560
 Positive
 +
 +
 -
 +
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
566
 Negative
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 +
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
Total (n=)
 35
 28
 38
 1
 28
 27
 23
 20
 3
 2
 25
 0
% 53.0 42.4 57.6 1.5 42.4 40.9 34.8 30.3 4.5 3.0 37.9 0
Open in a new tab

aVirulence and β-lactamase genes results are adapted from Féria et al. [12] and Pomba et al. [13]; + PCR positive result; − PCR negative result.

Fluoroquinolones resistance is summarized in Table 2. Resistance was found in 13.6% of the uropathogenic isolates (n = 9) towards ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, marbofloxacin and orbifloxacin. One additional isolate was resistant to orbifloxacin. All E. coli isolates were simultaneously resistant to all the fluoroquinolones tested.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility to 2 nd generation fluoroquinolones and its relation with biofilm production in 66 E. coli isolates from dogs with urinary infections

 
  
 Fluoroquinolones
    CIP ENR MAR OBX
Susceptibility criteria (μg/mL)a
 Susceptible; Resistant
 ≤ 1; ≥ 4
 ≤ 0.5; ≥ 4
 ≤ 1; ≥ 4
 ≤ 1; ≥ 8
Susceptibility results
 Susceptible
 57 (86.4%)
 57 (86.4%)
 57 (86.4%)
 56 (84.8%)
 
 Resistant
 9 (13.6%)
 9 (13.6%)
 9 (13.6%)
 10 (15.2%)
Relation with biofilm production   P < 0.05 P < 0.05 P < 0.05 P < 0.05
Open in a new tab

aIsolates that were categorized as intermediate to the antimicrobial compounds were recorded as susceptible, since the bactericidal activity of these antimicrobials depends of their in vivo concentration and quinolones are known to be concentrated from 100- to 300-fold within the urinary tract (Cohn and others 2003); CIP Ciprofloxacin (CLSI 2014), ENR Enrofloxacin (CLSI 2013), MAR Marbofloxacin (CLSI 2013), OBX Orbifloxacin (CLSI 2013).

Biofilm formation has been described as an important E. coli virulence factor in human UTI. In this study, biofilm-forming ability of 66 UPEC dog isolates was evaluated. Previous works showed that isolates ability to form biofilm depends upon the medium used and time of observation [16-19]. In our study, no differences were found regarding biofilm production in BHIB and TSB. Almost half of the isolates were able to form biofilm at 24 hours in both media, and this percentage significantly increased with incubation time.

Association between biofilm and other virulence factors has already been studied [18]. In this work, biofilm was not associated to toxin production (hly and cnfI), or to filamentous adhesions involved in host specific adhesion (sfa and pap). Nevertheless, associations between biofilm and afa and aer were significant. These results may indicate that adhesive non-fimbrial adhesions are important for the initial steps of biofilm formation and that the aerotaxis receptor may be involved in the oxygenation of these structures. Biofilm production was also associated to the presence of the β-lactamase genes. Our results are not in accordance with previous works [18,20] that stated that E. coli strains that are β-lactamase producers may not be able to form biofilms.

Regarding fluoroquinolones resistance, compounds tested showed an in vitro efficacy of more than 80%, as already observed by other authors [11,21]. It is important to refer that although these broad-spectrum antibiotics are extensively used for treatment of animal related infections, their efficacy remains high [11].

Biofilm structures are believed to impair antimicrobial compounds action [10,22]. Association between biofilm and fluoroquinolone resistance was considered significant in all time points, independently of the media, which is in agreement with previous human UTI studies [9]. Biofilm formation by UPEC may contribute for UTI treatment failure in dogs, since these structures are responsible for the establishment of bacterial reservoirs inside the bladder cells, allowing them to overcome the host immune defences and to establish recurrent infections [9].

To our knowledge, this is the first report of the association between biofilm formation and fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli dog UTI isolates, representing an important novelty. This fact is relevant for biofilm and antimicrobial resistance control in veterinary medicine and the establishment of more adequate therapeutic protocols.

Animal ethics

No experimental research on vertebrates or any regulated invertebrates were performed in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MO participated in the study conception and design, carried out the biofilm studies and drafted the manuscript. CP participated in the study conception and design, carried virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes studies and minimum inhibitory concentration determinations and helped to draft the manuscript. FRD participated in the biofilm studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Manuela Oliveira, Email: moliveira@fmv.ulisboa.pt.

Filipa Rocha Dias, Email: rochadiasfilipa@gmail.com.

Constança Pomba, Email: cpomba@fmv.ulisboa.pt.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CIISA (“Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal”) from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Project PEst-OE/AGR/U10276/2014, funded by FCT and by CIISA/82/2006 grant from “Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia” (FCT), Lisbon, Portugal.

References

  1. Arisoy M, Rad AY, Akin A, Akar N. Relationship between susceptibility to antimicrobials and virulence factors in paediatric Escherichia coli isolates. Int J Antimicrob Ag. 2008;31S:S4–S8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnson JR, Owens K, Gajewski A, Clabots C. Escherichia coli colonization patterns among human household members and pets, with attention to acute urinary tract infection. J Inf Dis. 2008;197:218–224. doi: 10.1086/524844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Justice SS, Hung C, Theriot JA, Fletcher DA, Anderson GG, Footer MJ, Hultgren SJ. Differentiation and developmental pathways of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in urinary tract pathogenesis. PNAS. 2004;101:1333–1338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308125100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson JR, Kaster N, Kuskowski MA, Ling GV. Identification of urovirulence traits in Escherichia coli by comparison of urinary and rectal E. coli isolates from dogs with urinary tract infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:337–345. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.337-345.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Blanco J, Leflon-Guibout V, Demarty R, Alonso MP, Caniça MM, Park YJ, Lavigne JP, Pitout J, Johnson JR. International emergence of Escherichia coli clone O25:H4-ST131 producing CTX-M-15. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;61:273–281. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pomba C, Fonseca JD, Baptista BC, Correia JD, Martínez-Martínez L. Detection of the pandemic O25–ST131 human virulent Escherichia coli CTX-M-15-producer clone harbouring the qnrB2 and aac(6′)-Ib-cr genes in a dog. Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 2009;53:327–328. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00896-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson GG, Martin SM, Hultgren SJ. Host subversion by formation of intracellular bacterial communities in the urinary tract. Microb Inf. 2004;6:1094–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Soto SM, Smithson A, Horcajada JP, Martinez JA, Mensa JP, Vila J. Implication of biofilm formation in the persistence of urinary tract infection caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Inf. 2006;12:1021–1045. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01543.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Suman E, Jose J, Varghese S, Kotian MS. Study of biofilm production in Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infection. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005;25:305–306. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.34788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Trautner BW, Darouiche RO. Role of biofilm in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Am J Inf Control. 2004;32:177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohn LA, Gary AT, Fales WH, Madsen RW. Trends in fluoroquinolone resistance of bacteria isolated from canine urinary tracts. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2003;15:338–343. doi: 10.1177/104063870301500406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Féria C, Machado J, Duarte Correia J, Gonçalves J, Gaastra W. Virulence genes and P fimbriae PapA subunit diversity in canine and feline uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol. 2001;82:81–89. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00375-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pomba C, Mendonça N, Costa M, Louro D, Baptista B, Ferreira M, Duarte Correia J, Caniça M. Improved multiplex PCR method for the rapid detection of β-lactamase genes in Escherichia coli of animal origin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;56:103–106. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, editor. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-fourth informational supplement M100-S24. 2014. http://clsi.org/blog/2014/01/27/m100-s24_em100_2014/ [Google Scholar]
  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Document VET01-S2: performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard. In: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, editor. Second Informational Supplement. 2013. http://shopping.netsuite.com/s.nl/c.1253739/it.A/id.1684/.f. [Google Scholar]
  16. Oliveira M, Nunes SF, Carneiro C, Bexiga R, Bernardo F, Vilela CL. Time course of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis mastitis isolates. Vet Microbiol. 2007;124:187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Camilli A, Bassler BL. Bacterial small-molecule signalling pathways. Science. 2006;311:1113–1116. doi: 10.1126/science.1121357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Naves P, del Prado G, Huelves L, Gracia M, Ruiz V, Blanco J, Rodríguez-Cerrato V, Ponte MC, Soriano F. Measurement of biofilm formation by clinical isolates of Escherichia coli is method-dependent. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105:585–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Skyberg JA, Siek KE, Doetkott C, Nolan LK. Biofilm formation by avian Escherichia coli in relation to media, source and phylogeny. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:548–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gallant CV, Daniels C, Leung JM, Ghosh AS, Young KD, Kotra LP, Burrows LL. Common β-lactamases inhibit bacterial biofilm formation. Molec Microbiol. 2005;58:1012–1024. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04892.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ogeer-Gyles J, Mathews K, Weese JS, Prescott JF, Boerlin P. Evaluation of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and multi-drug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from the urine of dogs with indwelling urinary catheters. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006;229:1584–1590. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.10.1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. del Pozo JL, Patel R. The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Clin Pharmacol Therapeut. 2007;82:204–209. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Research Notes are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES