Abstract
Background
Endovascular embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms provides an adequate treatment and long-term results with less morbidity and mortality (M&M) compared with surgical treatment. Since the last decade more and more ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IA) undergo endovascular embolization in the United States. We present our experience of the initial one year periprocedural M&M at Paul L. Foster School of Medicine (PLFSM), Texas Tech Health Science Center (TTUHSC) in El Paso, Texas.
Methods
Demographics, technical aspects of the endovascular procedure and clinical assessment, including several commonly used scales to assess the severity in case of subarachnoid hemorrhage were collected. Perioperative complications were classified as minor and major. All data is prospectively collected in a local database. Only endovascular treated aneurysms were included in the study
Results
During the first year of opening of the interventional neurology program at our school of medicine (March 2011 and March 2012), a total 45 ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms were treated with endovascular embolization. Two thirds of the patients (n = 27) presented with a ruptured IA. Within those with a ruptured aneurysm, the most median Hunt and Hess grade was 3. By large the vast majority of treated IA were in the anterior circulation and more than half measured 7–12 mm. Only three unruptured IA were <7 mm (average 5.5 mm). Complications occurred in seven patients (15%), four of them were minor without any clinical sequelae. The remaining three included; intracranial dissection and aneurysmal rupture resulting in both hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke and death in only one patient.
Conclusion
The first year experience of interventional neurology services at Paul L. Foster School of Medicine in El Paso, Texas demonstrates successful treatments with comparable national rates of morbidity and mortality.
Abbreviations
- ACA
Anterior cerebral artery
- Acomm
Anterior communicating artery
- ESN
Endovascular surgical neuroradiology
- H&H
Hunt and Hess scale
- IA
Intracranial aneurysm
- ICA
Internal carotid artery
- MCA
Middle cerebral artery
- M&M
Morbidity and mortality
- SAH
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Pcomm
Posterior communicating artery
- PLFSM
Paul L. Foster School of Medicine
- TTUHSC
Texas Tech University Health Science Center
- VA
Vertebral artery
Keywords: subarachnoid hemorrhage, endovascular treatment, intracranial aneurysm, aneurysm coiling, cerebral angiography
Introduction
The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms (IA) accounts for 5% in the general population.1–4 Fortunately, the majority of intracranial aneurysms do not rupture over time, but the risk is size dependent. In the International study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, the 5-year cumulative risk of rupture was negligible for those measuring <7 mm. Whereas the risk was 2.6% and 14.5% for those sized 7–12 mm, located in the anterior and posterior circulation, respectively. Higher rates were found with larger sizes.5,6
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to a ruptured IA represents one of the worst diseases neurologists and neurosurgeons encounter in their practices. The annual rate of SAH is approximately six to eight per 100,000 or about 25,000–27,000 SAH cases a year in the United States2,7. Since the results of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) were published in 2002 endovascular treatment has become an important treatment option in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.8–10 The purpose of this study is to evaluate and share our first year experience in the endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at PLFSM.
Patients and methods
The data was retrospectively elicited from a prospective collected database of all neurointerventional cases performed by the interventional neurology team at PLFSM. The database include demographic information; age, sex, and ethnicity. Clinical characteristics including the Hunt and Hess grading scale, Fisher grade, and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) were prospectively collected in patients with SAH. Procedural features such as date of the procedure, aneurysm size and location, amount of contrast material used, total time of radiation exposure, and endovascular devices were also collected. Complications were classified as minor and major type and included; intraprocedural, and periprocedural (48 h) events. All consecutive patients that underwent endovascular treatment of a ruptured or unruptured IA were enrolled in the above-mentioned database and incorporated in our retrospective analysis.
Endovascular procedure
All patients undergoing endovascular embolization were treated under general anesthesia. The femoral artery approach was used for access. After placement of the standard guiding catheter (usually 6 French) in the cervical artery, a tapered flexible microcatheter (1.7–2.1 French) was used to select the aneurysmal sac over a 0.014 in flexible microwire. All ruptured and unruptured IA were embolized using detachable coils. Some ruptured IA were treated using the balloon remodeling coil embolization technique and some of the unruptured IA were treated using the stent-assisted coil embolization technique. All unruptured aneurysm were anticoagulated during the procedure using intravenous heparin and intermittent boluses were then used to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) around two times the baseline and preferentially less than 300 s.
Results
Between March 2011 and March 2012, a total of 45 intracranial aneurysms were treated with endovascular embolization. Overall, 27 were ruptured representing 60% of the sample. The mean age was 57 years (range 35–92 years) and 73% patients were women (n = 33). Approximately 80% of the treated patients were Hispanic/Latino ethnic group. The most common associated comorbidities were arterial hypertension (44%), diabetes mellitus (15%), dyslipidemia (9%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (6%).
The vast majority of the treated IA were located in the anterior circulation: MCA (26%) and internal carotid artery (22%), and posterior communicating artery (20%) in case of ruptured aneurysm (Table 1). The mean aneurysm diameter was 8.5 mm (2.5–28 mm), for the ruptured group the mean diameter was 7.1 mm and for the unruptured group was 9.8 mm. Regarding the severity of the SAH, 45% of the ruptured aneurysm that underwent to endovascular treatment had a Hunt and Hess grading score equal or less than III and almost 70% of the patients had a Fisher scale equal or less than 3. The mean fluoroscopic time for both groups (ruptured and unruptured aneurysms) was 32 min and the mean amount of iodine contrast material used was 180 ml.
Table 1. Population and lesion characteristics.
| Ruptured (%) | Unruptured (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| No. cases | 27 (60) | 18 (40) |
| Male/female | 7/20 | 5/12 |
| Age range (mean) | 35–92 (55, 96) | 37–80 (60, 29) |
| Size of aneurysm | ||
| <7 mm | 14 (51, 85) | 3 (16, 66) |
| 7–12 mm | 12 (44, 44) | 13 (72, 22) |
| 13–25 mm | 1 (3, 70) | 1 (16, 66) |
| >25 mm | – | 1 (16, 66) |
| Localization | ||
| MCA | 11 (40, 74) | 1 (5, 55) |
| ACA | 3 (11, 11) | 2 (11, 11) |
| Acomm | 3 (11, 11) | 3 (16, 66) |
| Pcomm | 5 (18, 51) | 5 (27, 77) |
| ICA | 4 (14, 81) | 6 (33, 33) |
| VA | 2 (7, 40) | – |
Complications during the procedure
Procedural and periprocedural complications occurred in seven patients (15%), four of them were minor. They were endovascular technical complications and led to no adverse neurological or other clinical consequences. One was a cervical internal carotid artery catheter-induced dissection in a patient with known fibromuscular dysplasia that was successfully treated with acute primary stent placement. The second one was a coil migration into the distal aspect of the parent vessels without restriction of the blood flow or clinical stroke. The third one was transient short intraoperative aneurysmal dome perforation with angiographic contrast extravasation without hemodynamic changes that was rapidly controlled with further coil embolization. The last minor complication was a transient asymptomatic carotid cavernous fistula the resolved spontaneously and it did not required further treatment. The remaining three complications were major complications (6.5%) and it included a cerebral infarct due to an intraprocedural intracranial dissection during embolization of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm, a posterior cerebral artery infarct in a ruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm and an intraprocedural aneurysmal rupture during embolization of a ruptured aneurysm resulting in hemorrhagic stroke and death.
Discussion
Patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms carry high rates of morbidity and mortality. The risk of re-rupturing during the first days to weeks is high enough to warrant an early treatment.11 Unruptured intracranial aneurysms of a certain size, location and morphological characteristics are at higher risk for future rupture and treatment is warranted. The justification for treatment of unruptured IA has been more complex and dependent predominantly on the assessment of risk of future spontaneous rupture (between 0.05% and 3.2% per annum for aneurysms less than 10 mm and up to 5.5% per annum for large aneurysms)12,13 compared with the risks and efficacy of treatment. In the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm, endovascular morbidity and mortality ranged from 7.1% to 9.8%, whereas surgical morbidity and mortality ranged from 10.1% to 12.6%.14,15,1,17
The rate of intraprocedural complications including intraprocedural rupturing of the aneurysm and thromboembolic complications is higher in case of ruptured IA. The data from our population shows acceptable rates of embolization-related complications, according to clinical trials.18 Moreover, the presence of acute SAH, additional intracerebral or intraventricular hemorrhage makes the management of thromboembolic complications and intraprocedural rupturing of aneurysm or arterial dissection more challenging.19,20 In our condition, endovascular treatment shows good outcomes and some advantages over surgical treatment, at discharge and later survival even compared with other studies.21
Conclusions
The first-year experience of the interventional neurology program at Paul L. Foster School of Medicine (PLFSM), Texas Tech Health Science Center (TTUHSC) in El Paso, Texas demonstrates that intracranial ruptured and unruptured aneurysms can be successfully treated with endovascular embolization technique, and with rates of morbidity and mortality comparable with those described in previous studies.
Table 2. Procedural and periprocedural complications.
| Age | Status | Localization | H&H/Fisher | Size (mm) | Complication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | Unruptured | ICA | – | 7.5 | ICA dissection |
| 46 | Unruptured | ACA | – | 9 | Pericallosal artery dissection and ACA cortical infarct |
| 62 | Ruptured | Pcomm | 1/II | 11.5 | Posterior cerebral artery infarct |
| 61 | Ruptured | MCA | 4/III | 4 | Large intracranial hemorrhage, vasospasm, death |
| 55 | Ruptured | ACA | 4 /III | 7.2 | Intra operative rupture |
| 61 | Unruptured | Pcomm | – | 7.6 | Left carotid cavernous fistula |
| 80 | Unruptured | Pcomm | – | 18 | Coil migration |
References
- Schievink WI, Schaid DJ, Michels VV, et al. Familial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a community-based study. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:426–9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.3.0426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grobelny TJ. Brain aneurysms: epidemiology, treatment options and milestones of endovascular treatment options. Dis Mon. 2011;57:647–55. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2011.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winn HR, Jane JA, Taylor JA, et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic incidental aneurysms: review of 4568 arteriograms. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:43–9. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.1.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Connolly ES, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711–37. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seibert B, Tummala RP, Chow R, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: review of current treatment options and outcomes. Frontiers in Neurol. 2011 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wirth FP. Surgical treatment of incidental intracranial aneurysms. Clin Neurosurg. 1986;33:125–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:427–33. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70080-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366:809–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suarez JI, Tarr RW, Selman WR. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorraghe. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:387–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krings T, Mandell DM, Tim-Rasmus K, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: from vessel wall patholoogy to the therapeutic approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7:547–59. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brisman JL Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. NEJM. 2006;355:928–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minn R Wiebers D, Whisnant J, et al. Unruptured Intracranial aneurysms - risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. NEJM. 1998;339:1725– 33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812103392401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston SC, Wilson CB, Halbach VV, et al. Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: comparison of risks. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:11–9. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200007)48:1<11::aid-ana4>3.3.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loewenstein JE, Gayle SC, Duffis EJ, et al. The natural history and treatment options for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Int J Vascular Med. 2012 doi: 10.1155/ijvm.2012898052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyers PM, Schumacher HC, Higashida RT, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms. J Neuro Intervent Surg. 2010;2:312–23. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2010.002337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qureshi AI, Janardhan V, Memon MZ, et al. Initial experience in establishing an academic neuroendovascular service: program building, procedural types, and outcomes. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2009;19:72–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hae-Kwah P, Horowitz M, Jungreis C, et al. Periprocedural morbidity and mortality associated with endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:506–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho YD, Lee JY, Seo JH, et al. Intra-arterial tirofiban infusion for thromboembolic complication durign coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiology. 2012;81:2833–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qureshi AI, Janardhan V, Hanel RA, Lanzino G. Comparison of endovascular and surgical treatments for intracranial aneurysms: an evidence-based review. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:816–25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70217-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
