Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1993 Mar;12(3):1047–1057. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05746.x

Analysis of strand exchange and DNA binding of enhancer-independent Gin recombinase mutants.

A Klippel 1, R Kanaar 1, R Kahmann 1, N R Cozzarelli 1
PMCID: PMC413306  PMID: 8384550

Abstract

The Gin recombination system of phage Mu mediates inversion of the DNA sequence between two sites (gix). In addition to Gin protein and gix sites, recombination requires an enhancer bound by the host factor FIS. We analyzed mutants of Gin that function in the absence of the enhancer and FIS and mediate deletion and intermolecular fusion in addition to inversion. The linking number changes caused by inversion imply that mutant Gin alone can form the same synaptic complex and can use the same strand exchange mechanism as the complete wild-type system. However, the linking number changes also reveal that unlike wild-type Gin, mutant Gin can recombine through more than one synaptic complex and can relax DNA in the absence of synapsis. This expanded repertoire allows mutant Gin to mediate DNA rearrangements not performed by wild-type Gin. Because mutant Gin, but not wild-type Gin, unwinds gix site DNA upon binding, we postulate that FIS and the enhancer function with (-) supercoiling to promote this unwinding with wild-type Gin. The analysis of the topological changes during DNA fusion shows that both the parallel gix site configuration and the right-handed rotation of the sites during exchange of wild-type Gin are a result of the (-) supercoiling of the substrate and the number of entrapped supercoils in the synaptic complex.

Full text

PDF
1047

Images in this article

1048Image
on p.1048
1049Image
on p.1049
1051Image
on p.1051
1052Image
on p.1052
1053Image
on p.1053
1054Image
on p.1054
1054Image
on p.1054

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abremski K., Frommer B., Hoess R. H. Linking-number changes in the DNA substrate during Cre-mediated loxP site-specific recombination. J Mol Biol. 1986 Nov 5;192(1):17–26. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90460-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ansari A. Z., Chael M. L., O'Halloran T. V. Allosteric underwinding of DNA is a critical step in positive control of transcription by Hg-MerR. Nature. 1992 Jan 2;355(6355):87–89. doi: 10.1038/355087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bliska J. B., Cozzarelli N. R. Use of site-specific recombination as a probe of DNA structure and metabolism in vivo. J Mol Biol. 1987 Mar 20;194(2):205–218. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90369-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boles T. C., White J. H., Cozzarelli N. R. Structure of plectonemically supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):931–951. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bramhill D., Kornberg A. Duplex opening by dnaA protein at novel sequences in initiation of replication at the origin of the E. coli chromosome. Cell. 1988 Mar 11;52(5):743–755. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90412-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruist M. F., Glasgow A. C., Johnson R. C., Simon M. I. Fis binding to the recombinational enhancer of the Hin DNA inversion system. Genes Dev. 1987 Oct;1(8):762–772. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.8.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cozzarelli N. R., Krasnow M. A., Gerrard S. P., White J. H. A topological treatment of recombination and topoisomerases. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:383–400. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):793–800. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90554-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dean F. B., Hurwitz J. Simian virus 40 large T antigen untwists DNA at the origin of DNA replication. J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 15;266(8):5062–5071. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Echols H. Nucleoprotein structures initiating DNA replication, transcription, and site-specific recombination. J Biol Chem. 1990 Sep 5;265(25):14697–14700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frantz B., O'Halloran T. V. DNA distortion accompanies transcriptional activation by the metal-responsive gene-regulatory protein MerR. Biochemistry. 1990 May 22;29(20):4747–4751. doi: 10.1021/bi00472a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hatfull G. F., Noble S. M., Grindley N. D. The gamma delta resolvase induces an unusual DNA structure at the recombinational crossover point. Cell. 1987 Apr 10;49(1):103–110. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90760-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heichman K. A., Moskowitz I. P., Johnson R. C. Configuration of DNA strands and mechanism of strand exchange in the Hin invertasome as revealed by analysis of recombinant knots. Genes Dev. 1991 Sep;5(9):1622–1634. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hughes R. E., Hatfull G. F., Rice P., Steitz T. A., Grindley N. D. Cooperativity mutants of the gamma delta resolvase identify an essential interdimer interaction. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1331–1338. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90428-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson R. C. Mechanism of site-specific DNA inversion in bacteria. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1991 Oct;1(3):404–411. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80307-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson R. C., Simon M. I. Hin-mediated site-specific recombination requires two 26 bp recombination sites and a 60 bp recombinational enhancer. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):781–791. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kahmann R., Rudt F., Koch C., Mertens G. G inversion in bacteriophage Mu DNA is stimulated by a site within the invertase gene and a host factor. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):771–780. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kamp D., Kahmann R., Zipser D., Broker T. R., Chow L. T. Inversion of the G DNA segment of phage Mu controls phage infectivity. Nature. 1978 Feb 9;271(5645):577–580. doi: 10.1038/271577a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kanaar R., Klippel A., Shekhtman E., Dungan J. M., Kahmann R., Cozzarelli N. R. Processive recombination by the phage Mu Gin system: implications for the mechanisms of DNA strand exchange, DNA site alignment, and enhancer action. Cell. 1990 Jul 27;62(2):353–366. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90372-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanaar R., van de Putte P., Cozzarelli N. R. Gin-mediated DNA inversion: product structure and the mechanism of strand exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Feb;85(3):752–756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.3.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanaar R., van de Putte P., Cozzarelli N. R. Gin-mediated recombination of catenated and knotted DNA substrates: implications for the mechanism of interaction between cis-acting sites. Cell. 1989 Jul 14;58(1):147–159. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90411-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kanaar R., van de Putte P., Cozzarelli N. R. Purification of the Gin recombination protein of Escherichia coli phage Mu and its host factor. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Mar 26;866(2-3):170–177. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(86)90114-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klippel A., Cloppenborg K., Kahmann R. Isolation and characterization of unusual gin mutants. EMBO J. 1988 Dec 1;7(12):3983–3989. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03286.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Klippel A., Mertens G., Patschinsky T., Kahmann R. The DNA invertase Gin of phage Mu: formation of a covalent complex with DNA via a phosphoserine at amino acid position 9. EMBO J. 1988 Apr;7(4):1229–1237. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02935.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Koch C., Kahmann R. Purification and properties of the Escherichia coli host factor required for inversion of the G segment in bacteriophage Mu. J Biol Chem. 1986 Nov 25;261(33):15673–15678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Landy A. Dynamic, structural, and regulatory aspects of lambda site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:913–949. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.004405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mertens G., Fuss H., Kahmann R. Purification and properties of the DNA invertase gin encoded by bacteriophage Mu. J Biol Chem. 1986 Nov 25;261(33):15668–15672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mertens G., Klippel A., Fuss H., Blöcker H., Frank R., Kahmann R. Site-specific recombination in bacteriophage Mu: characterization of binding sites for the DNA invertase Gin. EMBO J. 1988 Apr;7(4):1219–1227. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02934.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nash H. A. Bending and supercoiling of DNA at the attachment site of bacteriophage lambda. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 Jun;15(6):222–227. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90034-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nash H. A., Pollock T. J. Site-specific recombination of bacteriophage lambda. The change in topological linking number associated with exchange of DNA strands. J Mol Biol. 1983 Oct 15;170(1):19–38. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80225-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Plasterk R. H., Van de Putte P. Genetic switches by DNA inversions in prokaryotes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Jun 16;782(2):111–119. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(84)90013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Salvo J. J., Grindley N. D. The gamma delta resolvase bends the res site into a recombinogenic complex. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3609–3616. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sanderson M. R., Freemont P. S., Rice P. A., Goldman A., Hatfull G. F., Grindley N. D., Steitz T. A. The crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the site-specific recombination enzyme gamma delta resolvase at 2.7 A resolution. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1323–1329. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90427-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stark W. M., Boocock M. R., Sherratt D. J. Site-specific recombination by Tn3 resolvase. Trends Genet. 1989 Sep;5(9):304–309. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90113-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stark W. M., Sherratt D. J., Boocock M. R. Site-specific recombination by Tn3 resolvase: topological changes in the forward and reverse reactions. Cell. 1989 Aug 25;58(4):779–790. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Surette M. G., Chaconas G. The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage. Cell. 1992 Mar 20;68(6):1101–1108. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90081-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van de Putte P., Cramer S., Giphart-Gassler M. Invertible DNA determines host specificity of bacteriophage mu. Nature. 1980 Jul 17;286(5770):218–222. doi: 10.1038/286218a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES