Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine logoLink to Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
letter
. 2014 Jul-Sep;39(3):190. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.137166

Metabolic Syndrome in the Rural Population of Wardha, Central India: Confounding of Factor Analysis as Result of High Correlated Variables

Erfan Ayubi 1
PMCID: PMC4134539  PMID: 25136164

Sir,

In recent paper published in January-March 2013 issue of Indian J Community Med that Deshmukh and colleagues had done, was about factor analysis of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on rural population of Wardha, central India.(1) The authors aimed to factor analysis MetS components to represent interrelationships among sets of variables.

In factor analysis MetS papers, correlation coefficients and significance level were usually reported because earlier stage from factor analysis is data screening or item analysis. If any correlation coefficients greater than 0.9 are found, then we should be aware that a problem could arise because of singularity in data, as far as it suggested that we need to exclude one of the two variables in analysis.(2) It seems that there is multicollinearity among variables in this study. In their results, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in both sexes, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein in women have been loaded together on one factor without sharing with other variables because of their high collinearity. One could think that hypertension may not be linked to the MetS to the same extent as other components. Some investigator had used the mean arterial pressure(3) and systolic blood pressure.(4) If we put low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) together into model of factor analysis; was seen that Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value reduced steeply.(3) In addition, investigators usually did factor analysis of MetS without LDL-C and TC in their studies.(5,6)

References

  • 1.Deshmukh PR, Kamble P, Goswami K, Garg N. Metabolic syndrome in the rural population of Wardha, Central India: An exploratory factor analysis. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38:33–8. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.106625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. California: SAGE Publication; 2005. Exploratory factor analysis; p. 641. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tsai CH, Li TC, Lin CC, Tsay HS. Factor analysis of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adult Taiwanese. Endocrine. 2011;40:256–64. doi: 10.1007/s12020-011-9466-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen CH, Lin KC, Tsai ST, Chou P. Different association of hypertension and insulin-related metabolic syndrome between men and women in 8437 nondiabetic Chinese. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:846–53. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(00)00255-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hanson RL, Imperatore G, Bennett PH, Knowler WC. Components of the metabolic syndrome and incidence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51:3120–7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.10.3120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oh JY, Hong YS, Sung YA, Barrett-Connor E. Prevalence and factor analysis of metabolic syndrome in an urban Korean population. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2027–32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.8.2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Community Medicine : Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES