Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2014 Jul 1;32(10):1349–1355. doi: 10.1002/jor.22671

An Autologous Protein Solution prepared from the blood of osteoarthritic patients contains an enhanced profile of anti-inflammatory cytokines and anabolic growth factors

Krista O'Shaughnessey 1, Andrea Matuska 1, Jacy Hoeppner 1, Jack Farr 2, Mark Klaassen 3, Christopher Kaeding 4, Christian Lattermann 5, William King 1,*, Jennifer Woodell-May 1
PMCID: PMC4134723  NIHMSID: NIHMS600519  PMID: 24981198

Abstract

The objective of this clinical study was to test if blood from osteoarthritis (OA) patients (n = 105) could be processed by a device system to form an autologous protein solution (APS) with preferentially increased concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines compared to inflammatory cytokines. To address this objective, APS was prepared from patients exhibiting radiographic evidence of knee OA. Patient metrics were collected including: demographic information, medical history, medication records, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) surveys. Cytokine and growth factor concentrations in whole blood and APS were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Statistical analyses were used to identify relationships between OA patient metrics and cytokines. The results of this study indicated that anti-inflammatory cytokines were preferentially increased compared to inflammatory cytokines in APS from 98% of OA patients. APS contained high concentrations of anti-inflammatory proteins including 39,000 ± 20,000 pg/ml IL-1ra, 21,000 ± 5,000 pg/ml sIL-1RII, 2,100 ± 570 pg/ml sTNF-RI, and 4,200 ± 1,500 pg/ml sTNF-RII. Analysis of the 82 patient metrics indicated that no single patient metric was strongly correlated (R2 > .7) with the key cytokine concentrations in APS. Therefore, APS can be prepared from a broad range of OA patients.

Keywords: IRAP, IL-1, TNFα, platelet-rich plasma, APS, Pain

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease, and there is currently no common treatment that prevents or inhibits its progression. The inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) have been shown to play a critical role driving the progression of OA[1]. These cytokines can cause both pain [2] and cartilage degeneration [3]. Antagonists of IL-1β or TNFα, such as recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) or the soluble receptor for TNFα (sTNF-R), have been explored independently as OA therapies [4] but have not yet been proven efficacious [5]. Therefore, OA therapies that inhibit multiple inflammatory signaling pathways may be required to address the limitations of currently available therapies.

Autologous blood-derived products have been investigated as a possible therapy to treat OA because they contain molecules that target multiple signaling pathways. An autologous protein solution (APS) has been developed which is composed of: 1) white blood cells (WBCs) containing anti-inflammatory proteins, 2) platelets containing anabolic growth factors, and 3) concentrated plasma which contains anti-inflammatory proteins and anabolic growth factors [3,6-8]. This combination of WBCs, platelets, and concentrated plasma has produced solutions with increased concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines and anabolic growth factors from control donors [3]. Treatment with APS has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects in preclinical cell culture [6,7] and explant testing and decreased lameness in horses with naturally occurring OA in a prospective randomized clinical trial [8]. These positive tissue culture and animal clinical trial results support further evaluation of APS as a potential therapy for OA, beginning with the characterization of APS produced from blood taken from OA patients.

Research on autologous products has motivated the need for an autologous product containing the components of APS. Previously, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections have been investigated as a treatment for osteoarthritis [9]. Surrounding these studies, there has been debate regarding whether or not WBCs should be included in the autologous therapies [10]. However, in vitro experimentation [11], preclinical animal [12], and clinical testing in humans [13] have demonstrated that WBCs produce and mediate the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines. For example, WBC-containing PRP (termed L-PRP [14]) reduced the activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), a primary mediator of the inflammatory process, in cultured articular chondrocytes challenged with TNFα [11]. In an equine trial, L-PRP significantly decreased lameness and joint effusion [12]. In humans, L-PRP treatment was safe and resulted in a greater clinical improvement in OA symptoms than hyaluronic acid [15]. Taken together, these studies suggest that autologous products containing WBCs may play a role in modulating inflammation and should be further explored as a potential treatment for OA.

In this study, we hypothesized that the concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokines were increased over inflammatory cytokines in APS from OA patients. To test this hypothesis we compared cytokine profiles of APS and blood from either patients with diagnosed OA or control donors. Also, the possible effects of OA patient demographics, comorbidities, and concomitant medications on these profiles were explored.

Materials and Methods

OA patients (n = 105) were enrolled (NCT01050894) according to an IRB-approved protocol at four sites (University of Kentucky: IRB# 09-0785-F3R, Ohio State University: IRB study # 1113947, OrthoIndy/Orthopedics Research Foundation:

St. Francis Project # 652, Orthopedic Sports Medicine Center, Elkhart Indiana: IRB study # 1113947). The sample size was selected to account for OA patients with diverse comorbidities, concomitant medications, survey scores, and OA indicators. Inclusion in the study required radiographic evidence of knee OA including joint space narrowing (JSN), osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, or subchondral cysts. Patients were excluded from the study if they were pregnant or less than 18 years of age. Medical conditions that excluded patients were as follows: hemophilia or other blood clotting disorders, active hematologic cancer, currently undergoing chemotherapy, history of rheumatoid arthritis, septic joint, fracture, active infection or history of chronic infection. Patients who had used cytokine-blocking drugs in the previous 6 months were also excluded. Patients were required to sign an informed consent form prior to inclusion in the study and subsequently filled out Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Surveys (KOOS). KOOS is a subjective survey which contains five categories of questions about perception of affected knee pain within the past week including symptom sum (KOOSSS), pain (KOOSP), function- daily living (KOOSFDL), function- sports and recreation (KOOSFSR), and quality of life (KOOSQOL) [16]. A list of comorbidities and concomitant medications were also acquired from each patient (Supplementary Figure 2). Control donor samples were collected during internal testing studies at Biomet (WIRB # 1115097).

From each patient, 54 ml of whole blood was drawn with an 18-gauge apheresis needle into a 60 ml syringe containing 6 ml anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution, formula A (ACD-A, Citra Labs, Braintree, MA). Baseline blood was also drawn into a syringe containing ACD-A at a ratio of 1 to 9. To prepare APS, blood from the 60 ml syringe was transferred to the APS Separator (Biomet Biologics, Warsaw, IN). The device was processed using a centrifuge (Drucker Company, Philipsburg, PA) at 3200 rpm (1800g) for 15 minutes. The cell solution was then extracted and transferred to an APS Concentrator (Biomet Biologics, Warsaw, IN). The device was processed, and approximately 2-3 ml of APS was removed from the device. No platelet activation agents were combined with APS in this study. Baseline blood and APS were transferred to 15 ml centrifuge tubes labeled with patient number, patient initials, time and date in preparation for shipment.

For cytokine analysis, samples from three of the sites were shipped in dry ice. Samples from the fourth site were transported on the date of processing. Those samples were immediately frozen post-transportation. All samples were stored in a freezer at -50°C. Each sample was thawed once and aliquoted to enable the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Quantikine ELISA kits, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) which contain cell membrane lysis reagents to release cytokines and growth factors. The concentrations of cytokines and growth factors were characterized in the baseline blood and APS of each of the 105 patient samples (measured proteins included: TNFα, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, sTNF-RI, sTNF-RII, IL-1ra, sIL-1RII, epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), platelet derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB), PDGF-BB, and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1). Patient medical and medication history was used to identify any comorbidities or concomitant medications that may affect the APS concentrations of these cytokines from OA patients. Key cytokine and growth factor concentrations from control donors were determined from samples from normal subjects (Western IRB Study # 1115097).

According to a Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality, most cytokine and growth factor profiles did not meet the normality assumption required for a Pearson R-squared analysis of correlation. For this reason, a nonparametric Spearman Rank correlation (α = 0.05) was performed to determine significant univariate associations between APS cytokines, whole blood cytokine concentration, concomitant diseases, medications, and KOOS scores. A stepwise multiple regression analysis of the interactions was performed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The univariate markers were examined for confounding effects, and stratification and stepwise linear regression were used to determine the driver variables in the relationships. Important interactions and their corresponding p-values were reported.

Results

Patient demographics demonstrated the distribution of radiographic evidence of OA including joint space narrowing, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, or subchondral cysts (Table 1). Patients were enrolled in a sequential manner. A total of 9 patients were enrolled at the University of Kentucky, 34 patients were enrolled at Ohio State University, 8 patients were enrolled at OrthoIndy, and 54 patients were enrolled at the Orthopedic Sports Medicine Center. Six blood samples were excluded from cytokine analysis due to protocol deviations which would affect measured cytokine concentrations, including blood draw errors such as inadequate ACD-A volume or incorrect blood draw volume, preventing proper blood processing (n = 3). A device processing error resulted in an insufficient APS sample volume (n = 1), and shipment errors resulted in sample thawing and subsequent clotting (n = 2). Excluding these samples still enabled the analysis of cytokines and growth factors from (n = 99) donors. Demographic information on control donors is included in Supplementary Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic information of 105 OA patients. Data reported as mean ± standard deviation range.

Parameter Finding
Gender Male Female
50.5% 49.5%
Age 58 ± 11 (22-85)
BMI 31.7 ±7.6 (20.2-61.1)
Race Caucasian African American Hispanic Asian Other
92% 3% 3% 1% 1%
Smokers 13%
KOOS: Symptoms and Stiffness 52.4 ±19.4
KOOS: Pain 49.4 ±17.9
KOOS: Daily Living 55.6 ±18.9
KOOS: Sports and Rec 27.5 ±23.8
KOOS: Quality of Life 32.7 ±19.3
KOOS: Total 48.7 ±17.7 (2.4-96.4)
Osteophytes 77%
Subchondral Sclerosis 75%
Subchondral Cysts 28%

Cytokine analyses of whole blood and APS indicated a wide range of cytokines available to be delivered as a potential treatment for OA (Table 2). Anti-inflammatory cytokines were significantly concentrated in the APS compared to whole blood (2.2- 5.9 fold) (p < 0.05 for all cytokines tested) (Table 2). Inflammatory cytokines were also concentrated in the APS compared to whole blood (p < 0.05 for all cytokines tested) but at lower average fold increases than measured for their corresponding anti-inflammatory counterparts. For example, while 42,000 ± 20,000 pg/ml IL-1ra was detected in APS, only 8.9 ± 7.3 pg/ml IL-1β was found, representing a IL-1ra:IL-1β ratio of 5,900 ± 2,900 (Table 2). Additionally, the concentrations of anabolic growth factors, including PDGF-BB, IGF-1, EGF, and TGF-β1, were increased in the APS compared to their concentrations in whole blood (p < 0.05 for each growth factor tested). The concentration of PDGF-AB in whole blood and APS was not significantly different (p = 0.0864) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Cytokine profile in whole blood and APS from OA patients. ND = non-detectible concentration of cytokine using ELISA assays. NA = not available due to non-detectible concentration of cytokine in whole blood.

Cytokine Concentration in Whole Blood (pg / ml) Concentration in APS (pg / ml) Average Fold Increase p Value
Anti-inflammatory Cytokines IL-1ra 7,600 ± 2,500 42,000 ± 20,000 5.9 0.015
sIL-1RII 9,500 ± 2,500 21,000 ± 6,300 2.2 <0.0001
sTNF-RI 810 ± 280 3,000 ± 960 3.9 <0.0001
sTNF-RII 1,500 ± 490 5,100 ± 1,900 3.5 <0.0001
Inflammatory Cytokines IL=1β 3.3 ±1.1 8.9 ± 7.3 2.8 0.0245
IL-8 74 ±30 290 ± 190 4.2 0.0013
IL-6 1.8 ±1.3 3.0 ± 3.5 1.6 <0.0001
TNF-α ND 4.3 ± 3.0 NA NA
Anabolic Growth Factors PDGF-AB 17,000 ±5,700 38,000 ± 25,000 2.5 0.0864
PDGF-BB 5,300 ± 2,400 12,000 ± 8,700 2.5 0.0006
IGF-1 79,000 ± 22,000 120,000 ± 43,000 1.5 <0.0001
EGF 370 ± 200 710 ± 490 2.2 0.0031
TGF-β1 57,000 ± 57,000 150,000 ± 150,000 4.2 <0.0001

APS contained an improved ratio of anti-inflammatory cytokines to inflammatory cytokines compared to their baseline ratio in whole blood. Of the devices, 98% tested had an improved Combined Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Blocking Ratio (Equation 1 and Table 3).

Table 3.

Percent of devices that processed blood from OA donors to form APS with improved (> 1.0) Anti-IL-1 Cytokine Blocking ratios ([IL-1ra + sIL-1RII / IL-1β]APS / [IL-1ra + sIL-1RII / IL-1β]Blood), Anti-TNFα Cytokine Blocking Ratio ([sTNF-RI + sTNF-RII / TNFα]APS / [sTNF-RI + sTNF-RII / TNFα]Blood), and Combined Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Blocking Ratio (([IL-1ra + sIL-1RII / IL-1β]APS / [IL-1ra + sIL-1RII / IL-1β]Blood) or ([sTNF-RI + sTNF-RII / TNFα]APS / [sTNF-RI + sTNF-RII / TNFα]Blood)).

Ratio % of Devices with Improved Cytokine Blocking Ratios
Anti-IL-1 Cytokine Blocking Ratio 90.8%
Anti-TNFα Cytokine Blocking Ratio 89.8%
Combined Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Blocking Ratio 98.0%

Combined Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Blocking Ratio

[IL1ra+sIL1RII]IL1βAPS[IL1ra+sIL1RII]IL1βBloodor[sTNFRI+sTNFRII]TNFαAPS[sTNFRI+sTNFRII]TNFαBlood>1.0 Equation 1

Similarly, 91% of the devices had improved Anti-IL-1 Cytokine Blocking Ratios (Equation 2). Also, 90% of the devices had improved Anti-TNFα Cytokine Blocking Ratios (Equation 3)

Anti-IL-1 Cytokine Blocking Ratio

[IL1ra+sIL1RII]IL1βAPS[IL1ra+sIL1RII]IL1βBlood>1.0 Equation 2

Anti-TNFα Cytokine Blocking Ratio

[sTNFRI+sTNFRII]TNFαAPS[sTNFRI+sTNFRII]TNFαBlood>1.0 Equation 3

The fold increase in key anti-inflammatory cytokines and anabolic growth factors, whose recombinant counterparts have been tested as treatments for OA, were similar in APS from OA and control donors (Table 4). For example, control donors' APS contained an average of 6.6 fold greater concentration of IL-1ra than baseline blood; whereas OA patients' APS contained an average of 5.9 fold greater concentration of IL-1ra than baseline blood. The fold increase of inflammatory IL-1β was 3× and 2.8× for control donors and OA patients, respectively. Anabolic IGF-1 was similarly concentrated 1.5× for both control donors and OA patients.

Table 4.

Comparison of key cytokines and growth factors in APS from OA patients and control donors. ND = nondetectible concentration of cytokine using ELISA assays. NA = not available due to non-detectible concentration of cytokine in whole blood.

Cytokine Baseline Concentration APS Concentration (pg/ml) Fold Increase
IL-1ra Control (n = 92) 6,300 ± 3,000 39,000 ± 20,000 6.6
OA (n = 99) 7,600 ± 2,500 42,000 ± 20,000 5.9
sIL-IRII Control (n = 51) 10,000 ± 2,500 21,000 ± 5,000 2.1
OA (n = 99) 9,500 ± 2,500 21,000 ± 6,300 2.2
sTNF-RI Control (n = 53) 650 ± 490 2,100 ± 570 3.7
OA (n = 99) 810 ± 280 3,000 ± 960 3.9
sTNF-RII Control (n = 64) 1,000 ± 360 4,200 ± 1,500 4
OA (n = 99) 1,500 ± 490 5,100 ± 1,900 3.5
IL-1β Control (n = 56) 2.7 ± 1.2 7.2 ± 3.1 3
OA (n = 99) 3.3 ± 1.1 8.9 ± 7.3 2.8
TNFα Control (n = 26) ND 1.7 ± 0.8 NA
OA (n = 85) ND 4.3 ± 3.0 NA
IGF-1 Control (n = 48) 34,000 ± 37,000 52,000 ± 60,000 1.5
OA (n = 98) 79,000 ± 22,000 120,000 ± 43,000 1.5

Regression analyses were used to detect if there were any relationships between patient metrics (37 disease categories, 36 medications, five KOOS subsections, and four OA indicators). There were no strong Spearman Rank correlations (R2 > 0.70) [17] found between any cytokines, comorbidities, concomitant medications, OA indictors, or KOOS scores. There were several significant but weak correlations (R2 of 0.30 to 0.70) between anti-inflammatory cytokine concentrations in APS and concomitant diseases, medications, OA indicators, and KOOS scores (Table 5).

Table 5.

Comorbidities, concomitant medications, OA indicators, and KOOS scores that weakly correlated (R2 of 0.30 to 0.70) with the concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokines in APS.

Metric
Weakly Positively Correlated with > 1 Anti-inflammatory Cytokine Hypertension, Age
Weakly Negatively Correlated with > 1 Anti-inflammatory Cytokine None
Weakly Positively Correlated with > 1 Inflammatory Cytokine None
Weakly Negatively Correlated with > 1 Inflammatory Cytokine Hypertension
Weakly Positively Correlated with > 1 Anabolic Growth Factor KOOS FSR
Weakly Negatively Correlated with > 1 Anabolic Growth Factor Proton Pump Inhibitors
% of Metrics Weakly Correlated with Cytokine or Growth Factor Concentration 6.1%
% of Metrics Strongly Correlated with Cytokine or Growth Factor Concentration 0%

Discussion

The results of this study provide evidence that the APS device system preferentially increases anti-inflammatory cytokines over inflammatory cytokines. APS contained similarly concentrated cytokines and growth factors from control donors and OA patients. Regression analysis indicated that of the 37 disease categories, 36 medications, five KOOS subsections, and four OA indicators recorded for each patient (Supplementary Figure 2), no single patient metric exhibited a strong positive or negative correlation with the key anti-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokines in APS. Although there has been research exploring the relationship between obesity and inflammatory cytokine concentration in baseline whole blood [18], there was no correlation between obesity and the cytokine profile of processed APS. The high concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines and anabolic growth factors can be attributed to the components of APS which include WBCs, platelets, and plasma.

The high concentrations of IL-1ra, a key anti-inflammatory protein in APS, can be attributed to WBCs. WBCs have been identified as the primary source of IL-1ra in human tissues [19]. APS contains WBCs, whereas the output of commercially available devices that produce conditioned serums do not contain WBCs [20,21]. The output of these devices contains only serum prepared from blood incubated with glass beads for 6 - 24 hours. These extended incubation periods with glass beads also induce the production of IL-1and TNFα in horses [22] and humans [23]. It has been published that an IL-1ra:IL-1 ratio (pg/ml IL-1ra / pg/ml IL-1) of at least 1000 is necessary to inhibit IL-1[24]. In donor-paired experiments, APS contained greater concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines (Il-1ra, sIL-1RII, sTNF-RI, and sTNF-RII) and anabolic growth factors (PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, TGF-β, and EGF), and lower concentrations of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNFα) compared to autologous conditioned serums [25]. The presence of cells in APS may allow for the continued production of IL-1ra, sIL-1RII, sTNF-RI, and sTNF-RII after injection, which is not possible with cell-free serums. Also, conditioned serums are typically frozen after their extended incubation period for later injections [26], which can lead to cytokine degradation [27]. The presence of cells and never-frozen concentrated plasma allows APS to deliver high concentrations of bioactive anti-inflammatory cytokines and anabolic growth factors.

The concentrated plasma in APS also contains molecules which may promote cartilage healing and inhibit inflammation. IGF-1 is predominantly secreted into the plasma by the liver [28]. IGF-1 induces stem cell differentiation down the chondrogenic lineage and cartilage extracellular matrix deposition [29]. Fibrin clots loaded with supraphysiologic concentrations of IGF-1 led to increased cartilage healing in a large-defect equine model, but not complete tissue repair [30]. sIL-1RII is a plasma-residing form of the IL-1 receptor which has been cleaved from the cell surface. This soluble receptor binds and inhibits IL-1 in solution with high affinity due to the molecules' slow dissociation rate [31]. sTNF-RI and sTNF-RII are soluble forms of TNF-RI and TNF-RII which are cleaved from the cell surface, bind TNFα, and reside in the plasma [32]. The presence of multiple anti-inflammatory cytokines in the concentrated plasma and WBCs has enabled APS to inhibit both IL-1 and TNFα in cartilage explant testing using blood from control donors [7].

In addition to WBCs and plasma, APS contains platelets which contain important growth factors that may play a role in reducing inflammation associated with OA. Platelets contain alpha granules which store PDGF, EGF, and TGF-β [33]. Anabolic growth factors from platelets may also have pleiotropic effects on repairing tissue damage from OA. For example, PDGF promotes production of collagen by chondrocytes which is essential for proper cartilage function and regeneration [34]. PDGF in combination with IGF-1 has also been shown to decrease IL-1-mediated NF-κB activation and cartilage degradation [35]. EGF has been shown to stimulate chondrocyte proliferation [36] and increase the responsiveness of chondrocytes to IGF-1[37]. Short-term treatments with TGF-β have increased chondrogenesis and blocked inflammation by exerting immunosuppressive effects on lymphocytes [38]. In this study, no platelet activating agents were used to maintain consistency with previous bench top and large animal APS testing. In a separate study, growth factors were released from platelets in PRP when combined with synovial fluid without an exogenous platelet activator. Addition of thrombin to PRP increased the concentrations of TNFα and IL-6 in synovial fluid in vivo [39]. Together, the anabolic growth factors from platelets in APS may play an essential role in tissue repair and inhibition of inflammation. Taken together, available evidence suggests that an ideal candidate for study as an OA treatment should contain: 1) WBC-derived anti-inflammatory proteins, 2) platelet-derived growth factors, and 2) plasma-associated growth factors and cytokines.

The approach to forming an intermediate concentrated cell solution could have had a significant role in determining the composition of APS and its ability to inhibit inflammation. Commercially available systems that produce concentrated solutions without WBCs (Leukocyte-Reduced PRP) have not demonstrated high platelet recoveries, which are necessary to obtain significant concentrations of anabolic growth factors [40]. High platelet recoveries are not possible in commercial systems without forming a buffy-coat, which contains both WBCs and platelets. Further concentrating the WBCs and platelets from the intermediate cell solution is also critical to inhibit inflammatory signaling. For example, APS and its concentrated solution of anti-inflammatory cytokines was more effective than the intermediate cell solution at inhibiting MMP-13 production by IL-1β- and TNFα-stimulated chondrocytes [41]. The improved inhibition of MMP-13 production was attributed to the higher concentrations of IL-1ra, sTNF-RI, and sTNF-RII in APS compared to the intermediate cell solution.

Conclusions

The current study provides the first evidence that anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors could be preferentially concentrated in APS from OA patients. APS from control donors and OA donors contained similar concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines and anabolic growth factors. These results, in combination with previous in vitro cell culture studies, tissue explants studies, and an equine clinical trial provide compelling evidence that APS is a promising candidate for investigation as a treatment for OA.

Supplementary Material

01
02

Acknowledgments

Disclosures: Funding for this research was provided by Biomet Biologics. KO, WK, and JWM are employees of Biomet. AM was employed by Biomet during the study period. MK, CK, CL, and JF received support from Biomet this study.

References

  • 1.Fernandes JC, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP. The role of cytokines in osteoarthritis pathophysiology. Biorheology. 2002;39:237–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zelenka M, Schafers M, Sommer C. Intraneural injection of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha into rat sciatic nerve at physiological doses induces signs of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2005;116:257–63. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Woodell-May J, Matuska A, Oyster M, et al. Autologous protein solution inhibits MMP-13 production by IL-1beta and TNFalpha-stimulated human articular chondrocytes. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:1320–6. doi: 10.1002/jor.21384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goldring MB. Anticytokine therapy for osteoarthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2001;1:817–29. doi: 10.1517/14712598.1.5.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malemud CJ. Anticytokine therapy for osteoarthritis: evidence to date. Drugs Aging. 2010;27:95–115. doi: 10.2165/11319950-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O'Shaughnessey KM, Panitch A, Woodell-May JE. Blood-derived anti-inflammatory protein solution blocks the effect of IL-1beta on human macrophages in vitro. Inflamm Res. 2011;60:929–36. doi: 10.1007/s00011-011-0353-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matuska A, O'Shaughnessey KM, King WJ, Woodell-May JE. Autologous solution protects bovine cartilage explants from IL-1α- and TNFα- induced cartilage degradation. Journal of Orthopaedic Reseaarch. 2013;31:1929–35. doi: 10.1002/jor.22464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bertone AL, Ishihara A, Zekas LJ, et al. Evaluation of a single intra-articular injection of autologous protein solution for treatment of osteoarthritis in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 2014;75:141–51. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.2.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kon E, Filardo G, Matteo BD, Marcacci M. PRP For the Treatment of Cartilage Pathology. Open Orthop J. 2013;7:120–8. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mishra A, Harmon K, Woodall J, Vieira A. Sports medicine applications of platelet rich plasma. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1185–95. doi: 10.2174/138920112800624283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bendinelli P, Matteucci E, Dogliotti G, et al. Molecular basis of anti-inflammatory action of platelet rich plasma on human chondrocytes: Mechanisms of NF-kB inhibition via HGF. J Cell Physiol. 2010 doi: 10.1002/jcp.22274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Carmona JU. Autologous Platelet Concentrates as a Treatment of Horses with Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary Pilot Study. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2007;27:167–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kon E. PRP intra-articular injection and viscosupplementation as therapeutic treatments for early osteoarthritis: multicentre retrospective cohort study in 150 patients at 6 months follow up; ESSKA Meeting; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Bielecki T, Mishra A, et al. In search of a consensus terminology in the field of platelet concentrates for surgical use: platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), fibrin gel polymerization and leukocytes. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1131–7. doi: 10.2174/138920112800624328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kon E, Mandelbaum B, Buda R, et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection Versus Hyaluronic Acid Viscosupplementation as Treatments for Cartilage Pathology: From Early Degeneration to Osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, et al. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS) Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11):S208–28. doi: 10.1002/acr.20632. 10.1002/acr.20632. S208-S228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Epstein I, Tripodi T. Research Techniques for Program Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation. Columbia University Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ziccardi P, Nappo F, Giugliano G, et al. Reduction of inflammatory cytokine concentrations and improvement of endothelial functions in obese women after weight loss over one year. Circulation. 2002;19(105):804–9. doi: 10.1161/hc0702.104279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jordan M, Otterness IG, Ng R, et al. Neutralization of endogenous IL-6 suppresses induction of IL-1 receptor antagonist. J Immunol. 1995;154:4081–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wehling P, Moser C, Reinecke J. Use of Autologous Conditionaed Cell-free serum (Orthokine) in treating osteoarthritis and sciatic back pain. European Musculosketetal Review. 2009:8–11. Touch Briefings. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bare C, Shepard D. Cytokine concentration system. Google Patents. 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hraha TH, Doremus KM, McIlwraith CW, Frisbie DD. Autologous conditioned serum: The comparative cytokine profiles of two commercial methods (IRAP and IRAP II) using equine blood. Equine Vet J. 2011;43:516–21. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Magalon J, Bausset O, Veran J, et al. Physico-Chemical Factors Influencing Autologous Conditioned Serum Purification. BioResearch Open Access. 2014 doi: 10.1089/biores.2013.0041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wehling P, Moser C, Frisbie D, et al. Autologous conditioned serum in the treatment of orthopedic diseases: the orthokine therapy. BioDrugs. 2007;21:323–32. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200721050-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.King WJ, Woodell-May JE. Comparison of the Cellular and Cytokine Concentrations in the Output of the Autologous Protein Solution, Orthokine, and Onoccomed 2 Device Systems; OARSI Meeting; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moser C, Baltzer A, Krauspe R. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) comapred to HA-and Saline-injections for the treatment of knee OA. 2007. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arakawa T, Prestrelski SJ, Kenney WC, Carpenter JF. Factors affecting short-term and long-term stabilities of proteins. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;46:307–26. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00144-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rubin R, Baserga R. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor. Its role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumorigenicity. Lab Invest. 1995;73:311–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Asanbaeva A, Masuda K, Thonar EJ, et al. Regulation of immature cartilage growth by IGF-I, TGF-beta1, BMP-7, and PDGF-AB: role of metabolic balance between fixed charge and collagen network. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2008;7:263–76. doi: 10.1007/s10237-007-0096-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nixon AJ, Fortier LA, Williams J, Mohammed H. Enhanced repair of extensive articular defects by insulin-like growth factor-I-laden fibrin composites. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:475–87. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arend WP, Malyak M, Smith MF, Jr, et al. Binding of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, and IL-1 receptor antagonist by soluble IL-1 receptors and levels of soluble IL-1 receptors in synovial fluids. J Immunol. 1994;153:4766–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arend WP. The mode of action of cytokine inhibitors. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2002;65:16–21. 16-21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sanchez AR, Sheridan PJ, Kupp LI. Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:93–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schmidt MB, Chen EH, Lynch SE. A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:403–12. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Montaseri A, Busch F, Mobasheri A, et al. IGF-1 and PDGF-bb suppress IL-1beta-induced cartilage degradation through down-regulation of NF-kappaB signaling: involvement of Src/PI-3K/AKT pathway. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Holland TA, Mikos AG. Advances in drug delivery for articular cartilage. J Control Release. 2003;86:1–14. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00373-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bonassar LJ, Trippel SB. Interaction of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I in the regulation of growth plate chondrocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1997;234:1–6. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Patil AS, Sable RB, Kothari RM. An update on transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta): sources, types, functions and clinical applicability for cartilage/bone healing. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:3094–103. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Textor JA, Willits NH, Tablin F. Synovial fluid growth factor and cytokine concentrations after intra-articular injection of a platelet-rich product in horses. Vet J. 2013;10 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sundman EA, Cole BJ, Fortier LA. Growth Factor and Catabolic Cytokine Concentrations Are Influenced by the Cellular Composition of Platelet-Rich Plasma. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:2135–40. doi: 10.1177/0363546511417792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Matuska A, O'Shaughnessey K, Woodell-May JA. Comparison of Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Whole Blood, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and an Autologous Protein Solution in IL-1beta- and TNFalpha-Stimulated Chondrocytes. OARSI. 2011;19:S232–S233. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02

RESOURCES