Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1993 Jul;12(7):2855–2862. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05947.x

Actin and fimbrin are required for the internalization step of endocytosis in yeast.

E Kübler 1, H Riezman 1
PMCID: PMC413538  PMID: 8335001

Abstract

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, alpha-factor is internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis and transported via vesicular intermediates to the vacuole where the pheromone is degraded. Using beta-tubulin and actin mutant strains, we showed that actin plays a direct role in receptor-mediated internalization of alpha-factor, but is not necessary for transport from the endocytic intermediates to the vacuole. beta-tubulin mutant strains showed no defect in these processes. In addition, cells lacking the actin-binding protein, Sac6p, which is the yeast fimbrin homologue, are defective for internalization of alpha-factor suggesting that actin filament bundling might be required for this step. The actin dependence of endocytosis shows some interesting similarities to endocytosis from the apical membrane in polarized mammalian cells.

Full text

PDF
2855

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Botstein D. Dominant suppressors of yeast actin mutations that are reciprocally suppressed. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):675–683. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams A. E., Botstein D., Drubin D. G. Requirement of yeast fimbrin for actin organization and morphogenesis in vivo. Nature. 1991 Dec 5;354(6352):404–408. doi: 10.1038/354404a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams R. J., Pollard T. D. Binding of myosin I to membrane lipids. Nature. 1989 Aug 17;340(6234):565–568. doi: 10.1038/340565a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bretscher A., Weber K. Fimbrin, a new microfilament-associated protein present in microvilli and other cell surface structures. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jul;86(1):335–340. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown S. S. Phenotypes of cytoskeletal mutants. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;5(1):129–134. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(05)80018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bucci C., Parton R. G., Mather I. H., Stunnenberg H., Simons K., Hoflack B., Zerial M. The small GTPase rab5 functions as a regulatory factor in the early endocytic pathway. Cell. 1992 Sep 4;70(5):715–728. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90306-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chvatchko Y., Howald I., Riezman H. Two yeast mutants defective in endocytosis are defective in pheromone response. Cell. 1986 Aug 1;46(3):355–364. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90656-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins C. A. Dynamin: a novel microtubule-associated GTPase. Trends Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;1(2-3):57–60. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(91)90090-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cross F., Roberts J., Weintraub H. Simple and complex cell cycles. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1989;5:341–396. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.05.110189.002013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drubin D. G., Miller K. G., Botstein D. Yeast actin-binding proteins: evidence for a role in morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 2):2551–2561. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Drubin D. G., Mulholland J., Zhu Z. M., Botstein D. Homology of a yeast actin-binding protein to signal transduction proteins and myosin-I. Nature. 1990 Jan 18;343(6255):288–290. doi: 10.1038/343288a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dulic V., Egerton M., Elguindi I., Raths S., Singer B., Riezman H. Yeast endocytosis assays. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:697–710. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94051-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fleig U. N., Pridmore R. D., Philippsen P. Construction of LYS2 cartridges for use in genetic manipulations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1986;46(2-3):237–245. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90408-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S., Anderson R. G., Russell D. W., Schneider W. J. Receptor-mediated endocytosis: concepts emerging from the LDL receptor system. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:1–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gottlieb T. A., Ivanov I. E., Adesnik M., Sabatini D. D. Actin microfilaments play a critical role in endocytosis at the apical but not the basolateral surface of polarized epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(3):695–710. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.3.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gruenberg J., Howell K. E. Membrane traffic in endocytosis: insights from cell-free assays. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1989;5:453–481. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.05.110189.002321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huffaker T. C., Hoyt M. A., Botstein D. Genetic analysis of the yeast cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Genet. 1987;21:259–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huffaker T. C., Thomas J. H., Botstein D. Diverse effects of beta-tubulin mutations on microtubule formation and function. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;106(6):1997–2010. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.6.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jenness D. D., Burkholder A. C., Hartwell L. H. Binding of alpha-factor pheromone to yeast a cells: chemical and genetic evidence for an alpha-factor receptor. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(2 Pt 1):521–529. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90186-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jenness D. D., Spatrick P. Down regulation of the alpha-factor pheromone receptor in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1986 Aug 1;46(3):345–353. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90655-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kosaka T., Ikeda K. Reversible blockage of membrane retrieval and endocytosis in the garland cell of the temperature-sensitive mutant of Drosophila melanogaster, shibirets1. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):499–507. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lisanti M. P., Le Bivic A., Saltiel A. R., Rodriguez-Boulan E. Preferred apical distribution of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored proteins: a highly conserved feature of the polarized epithelial cell phenotype. J Membr Biol. 1990 Feb;113(2):155–167. doi: 10.1007/BF01872889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marsh L., Neiman A. M., Herskowitz I. Signal transduction during pheromone response in yeast. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1991;7:699–728. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.003411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miyajima I., Nakafuku M., Nakayama N., Brenner C., Miyajima A., Kaibuchi K., Arai K., Kaziro Y., Matsumoto K. GPA1, a haploid-specific essential gene, encodes a yeast homolog of mammalian G protein which may be involved in mating factor signal transduction. Cell. 1987 Sep 25;50(7):1011–1019. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90167-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Novick P., Botstein D. Phenotypic analysis of temperature-sensitive yeast actin mutants. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):405–416. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90154-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Novick P., Field C., Schekman R. Identification of 23 complementation groups required for post-translational events in the yeast secretory pathway. Cell. 1980 Aug;21(1):205–215. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90128-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nuoffer C., Jenö P., Conzelmann A., Riezman H. Determinants for glycophospholipid anchoring of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAS1 protein to the plasma membrane. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;11(1):27–37. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Payne G. S., Baker D., van Tuinen E., Schekman R. Protein transport to the vacuole and receptor-mediated endocytosis by clathrin heavy chain-deficient yeast. J Cell Biol. 1988 May;106(5):1453–1461. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.5.1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Payne G. S., Schekman R. A test of clathrin function in protein secretion and cell growth. Science. 1985 Nov 29;230(4729):1009–1014. doi: 10.1126/science.2865811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pearse B. M., Robinson M. S. Clathrin, adaptors, and sorting. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:151–171. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pierre P., Scheel J., Rickard J. E., Kreis T. E. CLIP-170 links endocytic vesicles to microtubules. Cell. 1992 Sep 18;70(6):887–900. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90240-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pryer N. K., Wuestehube L. J., Schekman R. Vesicle-mediated protein sorting. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:471–516. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.002351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Raths S., Rohrer J., Crausaz F., Riezman H. end3 and end4: two mutants defective in receptor-mediated and fluid-phase endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;120(1):55–65. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Riezman H. Endocytosis in yeast: several of the yeast secretory mutants are defective in endocytosis. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):1001–1009. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90360-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberts C. J., Nothwehr S. F., Stevens T. H. Membrane protein sorting in the yeast secretory pathway: evidence that the vacuole may be the default compartment. J Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;119(1):69–83. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sandvig K., Olsnes S., Petersen O. W., Van Deurs B. Control of coated-pit function by cytoplasmic pH. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;32:365–382. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61181-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sandvig K., van Deurs B. Selective modulation of the endocytic uptake of ricin and fluid phase markers without alteration in transferrin endocytosis. J Biol Chem. 1990 Apr 15;265(11):6382–6388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Seeger M., Payne G. S. A role for clathrin in the sorting of vacuolar proteins in the Golgi complex of yeast. EMBO J. 1992 Aug;11(8):2811–2818. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05348.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Seeger M., Payne G. S. Selective and immediate effects of clathrin heavy chain mutations on Golgi membrane protein retention in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;118(3):531–540. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.3.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shpetner H. S., Vallee R. B. Identification of dynamin, a novel mechanochemical enzyme that mediates interactions between microtubules. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):421–432. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Singer B., Riezman H. Detection of an intermediate compartment involved in transport of alpha-factor from the plasma membrane to the vacuole in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;110(6):1911–1922. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.6.1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wertman K. F., Drubin D. G., Botstein D. Systematic mutational analysis of the yeast ACT1 gene. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):337–350. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Whiteway M., Hougan L., Dignard D., Thomas D. Y., Bell L., Saari G. C., Grant F. J., O'Hara P., MacKay V. L. The STE4 and STE18 genes of yeast encode potential beta and gamma subunits of the mating factor receptor-coupled G protein. Cell. 1989 Feb 10;56(3):467–477. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90249-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zanolari B., Raths S., Singer-Krüger B., Riezman H. Yeast pheromone receptor endocytosis and hyperphosphorylation are independent of G protein-mediated signal transduction. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):755–763. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90552-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zot H. G., Doberstein S. K., Pollard T. D. Myosin-I moves actin filaments on a phospholipid substrate: implications for membrane targeting. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;116(2):367–376. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.2.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES