Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Sep;58(9):5613–5616. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02973-14

In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Profile and Correlation of Mycelial and Yeast Forms of Molecularly Characterized Histoplasma capsulatum Strains from India

Shallu Kathuria a, Pradeep K Singh a, Jacques F Meis b,c, Anuradha Chowdhary a,
PMCID: PMC4135809  PMID: 24982084

Abstract

The antifungal susceptibility profiles of the mycelial and yeast forms of 23 Histoplasma capsulatum strains from pulmonary and disseminated histoplasmosis patients in India are reported here. The MIC data of this dimorphic fungus had good agreement between both forms for azoles, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. Therefore, the use of mycelial inocula for H. capsulatum antifungal susceptibility testing is suggested, which is less time-consuming vis-à-vis the yeast form, which requires 6 to 8 weeks for conversion.

TEXT

Histoplasma capsulatum is the causative agent of histoplasmosis, a disease that is endemic in the Americas, Asia, and Africa, with sporadic cases reported worldwide (1). The clinical manifestations range from acute pulmonary to disseminated histoplasmosis, with histoplasmosis developing in immunocompromised patients (2). Therapy with amphotericin B and itraconazole is commonly used for the disseminated and mild to moderate forms of histoplasmosis, respectively (3). However, treatment with itraconazole and amphotericin B is limited by variable absorption/metabolism and toxicity, respectively. Treatment is often noncurative, and relapse and recrudescence can occur even while patients are on therapy (4). Furthermore, in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of this dimorphic fungus remains unstandardized. In addition, no consensus exists regarding testing of the pathogenic yeast form, which occurs in tissues, or the saprotrophic mold form present in the environment, which causes infection by inhaling microconidia. Differences in the antifungal susceptibilities of the two forms of this dimorphic pathogen were suggested in a solitary report of 4 isolates of H. capsulatum, revealing low MICs for fluconazole and high MICs for micafungin with the yeast form vis-à-vis the mycelial form (5). We report here the in vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles against 8 antifungals of both the mycelial and yeast forms of 23 molecularly characterized H. capsulatum strains from patients in India with pulmonary and disseminated histoplasmosis. Further, we correlated the MICs of H. capsulatum with clinical outcome.

Twenty-one H. capsulatum var. capsulatum isolates originating from 19 (1.9%) patients were cultured from 1,261 clinical specimens of 952 patients with pulmonary or systemic infection from tertiary care hospitals in northwestern India during 2010 to 2013. The clinical specimens comprised blood, bone marrow, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, lung and skin biopsy specimens, lymph node aspirates, and sputum. The isolates, along with 2 reference strains (H. capsulatum CDC B-5324 and ATCC 66368), were subjected to yeast conversion at 37°C on brain heart infusion (BHI) slants containing glutamine. The isolates were serially transferred onto fresh BHI slants every 5 to 6 days, and after 8 to 10 transfers, they revealed small (2 to 5 μm in diameter) yeast-like cells with narrow-based budding in 6 to 8 weeks. Sequencing of the D1/D2 large subunit (LSU) region of the isolates was done using the NL-1 and NL-4 primers, as described previously (26). GenBank searches of the sequences showed 99% identity with Ajellomyces capsulatus (GenBank accession no. HM595605.1).

Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of both forms was determined by broth microdilution using CLSI documents M27-A3 and M38-A2 (6, 7). The 8 to 10 days of hyphal growth on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (SDA) at 28°C was used for preparing the inoculum for the mycelial form, which was adjusted to an optical density at 530 nm of 0.20 to 0.24, diluted 1:10 in RPMI 1640 medium to obtain 2.5 × 105 to 5 × 105 conidia/hyphal fragments per ml. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 96 to 120 h. The yeast inocula, prepared from growth on BHI agar, were adjusted to 5 McFarland standard, diluted 1:100 in RPMI 1640 to obtain 1 × 105 to 2.5 × 105 CFU/ml, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 72 to 96 h (8). The antifungals tested were amphotericin B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), fluconazole (Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA), itraconazole (Lee Pharma, Hyderabad, India), voriconazole (Pfizer), posaconazole (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA), isavuconazole (Astellas, USA), 5-flucytosine (Sigma), and caspofungin (Merck). The final concentrations of the drugs ranged from 0.125 to 64 μg/ml for fluconazole and 5-flucytosine, 0.03 to 16 μg/ml for amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole, and 0.015 to 8 μg/ml for posaconazole, isavuconazole, and caspofungin. The CLSI-recommended reference strains Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC 204305 and Paecilomyces variotii ATCC 3630, were included with each test of the mycelial form, and Candida krusei strain ATCC 6258 and Candida parapsilosis strain ATCC 22019 were used for testing the yeast form. The MIC endpoints were read visually and for azoles and 5-flucytosine were defined as the lowest concentration yielding 80% inhibition of growth for the yeast form and 50% inhibition of growth for the mycelial form compared with the growth of the drug-free control wells. For amphotericin B, 100% inhibition of growth was considered for both forms. For caspofungin, the minimal effective concentration (MEC) against the mycelial form was defined as the lowest concentration of drug that led to the growth of small, rounded, and compact hyphal forms, whereas the MIC of the yeast form was defined as 50% inhibition. The geometric mean of MICs/MECs (GM) and MICs/MECs at which 50% (MIC50/MEC50) and 90% (MIC90/MEC90) of the tested isolates were inhibited for each drug were determined (8, 9). Furthermore, viability testing of the mycelial growth was done by streaking 20 μl of each suspension from the well, which showed complete inhibition, as well as the preceding two lower dilutions on SDA plates, and incubation at 28°C. The MICs/MECs of the quality control strains were in the CLSI-recommended ranges, and for all isolates, the drugs tested revealed reproducible MICs/MECs when performed by different personnel on two occasions, revealing only 1-fold difference in the dilutions. All procedures involving sporulating cultures of H. capsulatum were performed inside a class II biological safety cabinet under conditions of biosafety level 3 (BSL3) containment (10).

The results of AFST and the essential agreement between the two forms of H. capsulatum are presented in Table 1. The mycelial and the yeast forms of the isolates were inhibited by itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and the new drug isavuconazole. Previously, a solitary study reported isavuconazole MICs of the mold form of 28 H. capsulatum isolates (9). Additionally, 13% of the yeast forms revealed high caspofungin MICs of ≥0.5 μg/ml, which is in consonance with Kohler et al. (11), who demonstrated that caspofungin is not effective against this fungus. All the isolates in this study had high MICs for fluconazole and 5-flucytosine. Although the established treatment options for H. capsulatum include azoles, amphotericin B, and echinocandins, no comparative trials of these agents have been performed. Fluconazole treatment failure has been reported in cases of histoplasmosis, being partially attributed to isolates that demonstrated drug MICs of >5 μg/ml (8). However, in a mouse model, divergent observations suggesting fluconazole to be more efficacious against histoplasmosis caused by a fluconazole-resistant strain than by a fluconazole-susceptible strain have been reported (12). Further, there are studies reporting disagreements between in vitro and in vivo activities against H. capsulatum for caspofungin using either the yeast or mold form (11, 13). Notwithstanding the fact that the host immune status plays a vital role in patient recovery, susceptibility testing of dimorphic fungi yields basic information pertaining to its resistance and estimation of clinical value of the therapeutic agent. Therefore, emphasis on a standardized method for in vitro susceptibility testing and in vivo studies correlating both growth forms with the therapeutic outcome in dimorphic fungi is needed.

TABLE 1.

In vitro antifungal susceptibility profile of mycelial and yeast forms of 23 clinical strains of H. capsulatum against 8 antifungal drugs

H. capsulatum form Parameter(μg/ml) Data for antibiotica:
AMB ITC VRC POS ISA CASb FLU 5-FC
Mycelial GM 0.11 0.043 0.102 0.05 0.055 0.097 7.05 64
MIC50/MEC50 0.125 0.03 0.125 0.06 0.06 0.125 8 32
MIC90/MEC90 0.25 0.125 0.25 0.125 0.25 0.25 16 >64
Range 0.03 to 0.25 <0.03 to 0.125 <0.03 to 0.25 0.015 to 0.125 0.015 to 0.25 0.015 to 0.5 2 to 32 8 to >64
Yeast GM 0.13 0.051 0.17 0.085 0.04 0.17 4.56 48.2
MIC50 0.125 0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.25 4 16
MIC90 0.25 0.125 0.5 0.25 0.125 0.5 8 64
Range 0.03 to 0.5 0.03 to 0.25 0.03 to 0.5 0.03 to 0.5 0.015 to 0.125 0.03 to 1 2 to 8 8 to 64
Essential agreement (%)c 100 100 100 87 100 96 100 100
a

AMB, amphotericin B; ITC, itraconazole; VRC, voriconazole; POS, posaconazole; ISA, isavuconazole; CAS, caspofungin; FLU, fluconazole; 5-FC, flucytosine.

b

For caspofungin, the minimal effective concentration (MEC) was read for testing the mycelial form.

c

MIC discrepancies of more than two dilutions were used to calculate the essential agreement.

Of the 19 histoplasmosis cases, the therapy and outcome records of 18 patients were available, which included 12 disseminated, 4 chronic, and 2 acute pulmonary histoplasmosis cases. Out of the 12 disseminated cases, 6 patients died due to a misdiagnosis of tuberculosis with multiple courses of antituberculosis therapy. Of the remaining 6 disseminated cases, 2 patients died after treatment with amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB) (1 mg/kg of body weight) for 1 to 2 weeks. The remaining 4 were treated with AMB for 2 weeks, followed by 200 mg itraconazole twice daily for 6 to 12 months. The 6 pulmonary histoplasmosis cases were treated with 200 mg itraconazole twice daily for 3 months and 12 months for acute and chronic cases, respectively. These patients had no recrudescence after 12 to 18 months of follow-up.

The AFST data for H. capsulatum so far have been reported predominantly from the United States and Mexico, and a single report is from Brazil (Table 2) (8, 9, 11, 12, 1422). Although the disease is endemic in Asia, including India, there are a paucity of data on AFST and the treatment outcome of the pathogen from this part of the world. Unlike in North and South America, disseminated disease in India is predominantly seen in HIV-negative patients who are often misdiagnosed as having tuberculosis and, consequently, are not correctly treated (23, 24). In the present study, all disseminated cases were HIV negative. Notably, working with the mycelial morphotype, which is the infective form, requires BSL3 containment conditions, which are cumbersome (10). AFST studies for testing the mycelial form are limited, and no comparison has been made in the susceptibility differences with the parasitic yeast form (5, 11, 12, 14, 20, 21). The mycelial phase transforms to the yeast phase within 48 h of infection, suggesting that outcome relates more to the antifungal activity to the yeast phase than to the mycelial form (5). However, the mycelial form of a dimorphic fungus can coexist with yeast cells in vivo and might be more virulent and invasive, leading to dissemination (25).

TABLE 2.

In vitro antifungal susceptibility profile of H. capsulatum isolates reported globally

Location of isolation by continent Yr of isolation No. investigated (+ no. of reference strains investigated) (dimorphic form)a Method used (source) MIC/MIC range (μg/ml) forb:
Reference or source
AMB ITC VRC POS ISA FLU CAS/MFG/AFGc RAV
North America
    St. Louis, MO 1990 8 + 4 (Y) Broth microdilution using SDBd 0.30 to 1.04 2.95 to >1,000 12
    Indiana 1997 1 (Y) Broth macrodilution (NCCLS) 0.004 0.62 (parent), 1.25 (8th wk), 2.5 (12th wk), 20 (16th wk) 14
    Virginia 1998 5 (M) Broth microdilution (NCCLS) 0.25 to 0.5 0.06 0.06 15
    Virginia 1998 5 (M) Broth microdilution (NCCLS) 0.04 CAS, 1.3; AFG, 3.6 16
    Indiana 2000 20 (Y) Modified broth microdilution (NCCLS M-27A) 0.5 to 1 8 to 32 11
    Texas 2000 100 (M) Modified broth microdilution (NCCLS M-27A) <0.03 to 2 <0.03 to 0.5 <0.03 to 2 17
    Indiana 2001 65 (M) Modified broth microdilution (NCCLS M-27A) 0.019 to 0.077 0.31 to 10 8
    Virginia 2003 4–5 (M) Broth macrodilution (NCCLS M38-A) 0.06 to 0.5 <0.01 to 0.03 <0.03 to 0.06 1 to 16 CAS, 0.5 to 4; AFG, 2 to 4; MFG, >0.03 to 0.06 18
    Mexico 2005 28 (M) Broth macrodilution (NCCLS M38-A) 0.06 to 1 0.06 to 2 0.03 to 2 2 to 32 0.125 to 2 19
    Indiana 2006 17 (median MIC) (Y) Broth microdilution (NCCLS M-27A) 0.015 0.007 1 0.007 20
    Mexico 2009 28 (M) Broth macrodilution (CLSI M38-A) 0.06 to 0.25 0.25 to 2 0.06 to 2 0.03 to 2 0.125 to 2 4 to 32 9
South America
    Brazil 2012 68 (M) Modified broth microdilution (NCCLS M38-A) 0.007 to 0.5 0.001 to 0.031 0.0078 to 0.5 3.9 to 125 0.016 to 32 21
8 (Y) Modified broth microdilution (CLSI M27-A2) 0.06 to 0.5 0.0039 to 0.03 0.002 to 0.03 3.9 to 7.8 1 to 4
Asia
    Japan 2010 3 (M) Modified broth microdilution (CLSI M38-A) 0.013 to 0.05 <0.0004 0.006 to 0.025 0.003 to 0.006 0.55 to 1.2 22
    India 2014 21 + 2 (M) Modified broth microdilution (CLSI M38-A2) 0.03 to 0.25 <0.03 to 0.125 <0.03 to 0.25 0.015 to 0.125 0.015 to 0.25 2 to 32 0.015 to 0.5 Present study
21 + 2 (Y) Modified broth microdilution (CLSI M27-A3) 0.03 to 0.5 0.03 to 0.25 0.03 to 0.5 0.03 to 0.5 0.015 to 0.125 2 to 8 0.03 to 1
a

M, mycelial form; Y, yeast form.

b

AMB, amphotericin B; ITC, itraconazole; VRC, voriconazole; POS, posaconazole; ISA, isavuconazole; FLU, fluconazole; CAS, caspofungin; RAV, ravuconazole; MFG, micafungin; AFG, anidulafungin.

c

For caspofungin, MEC were defined for testing the mycelial form.

d

SDB, Sabouraud's dextrose broth.

The present comprehensive study reports the MIC data of a large number of isolates and revealed good essential agreement with the MICs of both the forms, which were 87 to 100% for azoles, 100% for amphotericin B, and 96% for caspofungin. The use of mycelial inocula for H. capsulatum AFST testing in future studies is suggested, considering that testing of the mycelial form is less time-consuming (12 to 15 days) vis-à-vis that for the yeast form (6 to 8 weeks), which requires cumbersome conversion and is prone to contamination.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The LSU sequences of 21 H. capsulatum isolates are deposited in GenBank with accession no. KJ653230 to KJ653245 and KJ939255 to KJ939260.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was carried out, in part, with financial assistance from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ref. 5/3/3/26/2010-ECD-I), Government of India, New Delhi, India.

J.F.M. received grants from Astellas and Merck. He has been a consultant to Basilea and Merck and has received speaker's fees from Merck and Gilead. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 30 June 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wheat LJ. 2006. Histoplasmosis: a review for clinicians from non-endemic areas. Mycoses 49:274–282. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01253.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kauffman CA. 2007. Histoplasmosis: a clinical and laboratory update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20:115–132. 10.1128/CMR.00027-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wheat J, Sarosi G, McKinsey D, Hamill R, Bradsher R, Johnson P, Loyd J, Kauffman C. 2000. Practice guidelines for the management of patients with histoplasmosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:688–695. 10.1086/313752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hecht FM, Wheat J, Korzun AH, Hafner R, Skahan KJ, Larsen R, Limjoco MT, Simpson M, Schneider D, Keefer MC, Clark R, Lai KK, Jacobson JM, Squires K, Bartlett JA, Powderly W. 1997. Itraconazole maintenance treatment for histoplasmosis in AIDS: a prospective, multicenter trial. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 16:100–107. 10.1097/00042560-199710010-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nakai T, Uno J, Ikeda F, Tawara S, Nishimura K, Miyaji M. 2003. In vitro antifungal activity of micafungin (FK463) against dimorphic fungi: comparison of yeast-like and mycelial forms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1376–1381. 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1376-1381.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard—3rd ed. CLSI M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard—2nd ed. CLSI M38-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wheat LJ, Connolly P, Smedema M, Brizendine E, Hafner R, AIDS Clinical Trials Group and the Mycoses Study Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 2001. Emergence of resistance to fluconazole as a cause of failure during treatment of histoplasmosis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency disease syndrome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:1910–1913. 10.1086/323781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.González GM. 2009. In vitro activities of isavuconazole against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi. Med. Mycol. 47:71–76. 10.1080/13693780802562969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wilson DE, Chosewood CL. 2007. Biosafety in microbiological biomedical laboratories, 5th ed. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kohler S, Wheat LJ, Connolly P, Schnizlein-Bick C, Durkin M, Smedema M, Goldberg J, Brizendine E. 2000. Comparison of the echinocandin caspofungin with amphotericin B for treatment of histoplasmosis following pulmonary challenge in a murine model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1850–1854. 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1850-1854.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kobayashi GS, Travis SJ, Rinaldi MG, Medoff G. 1990. In vitro and in vivo activities of Sch 39304, fluconazole, and amphotericin B against Histoplasma capsulatum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:524–528. 10.1128/AAC.34.4.524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Graybill JR, Najvar LK, Montalbo EM, Barchiesi FJ, Luther MF, Rinaldi MG. 1998. Treatment of histoplasmosis with MK-0991 (L-743,872). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:151–153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wheat J, Marichal P, Vanden Bossche H, Le Monte A, Connolly P. 1997. Hypothesis on the mechanism of resistance to fluconazole in Histoplasma capsulatum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:410–414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Espinel-Ingroff A. 1998. In vitro activity of the new triazole voriconazole (UK-109,496) against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and common and emerging yeast pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:198–202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Espinel-Ingroff A. 1998. Comparison of in vitro activities of the new triazole SCH56592 and the echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2950–2956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li RK, Ciblak MA, Nordoff N, Pasarell L, Warnock DW, McGinnis MR. 2000. In vitro activities of voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1734–1736. 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1734-1736.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Espinel-Ingroff. 2003. In vitro antifungal activities of anidulafungin and micafungin, licensed agents and the investigational triazole posaconazole as determined by NCCLS methods for 12,052 fungal isolates: review of the literature. Rev. Iberoam Micol. 20:121–136 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.González GM, Fothergill AW, Sutton DA, Rinaldi MG, Loebenberg D. 2005. In vitro activities of new and established triazoles against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi. Med. Mycol. 43:281–284. 10.1080/13693780500088416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wheat LJ, Connolly P, Smedema M, Durkin M, Brizendine E, Mann P, Patel R, McNicholas PM, Goldman M. 2006. Activity of newer triazoles against Histoplasma capsulatum from patients with AIDS who failed fluconazole. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:1235–1239. 10.1093/jac/dkl133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brilhante RS, Fechine MA, Mesquita JR, Cordeiro RA, Rocha MF, Monteiro AJ, Lima RA, Caetano ÉP, Pereira JF, Castelo-Branco DS, Camargo ZP, Sidrim JJ. 2012. Histoplasmosis in HIV-positive patients in Ceará, Brazil: clinical-laboratory aspects and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of Histoplasma capsulatum isolates. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 106:484–488. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yamazaki T, Inagaki Y, Fujii T, Ohwada J, Tsukazaki M, Umeda I, Kobayashi K, Shimma N, Page MG, Arisawa M. 2010. In vitro activity of isavuconazole against 140 reference fungal strains and 165 clinically isolated yeasts from Japan. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 36:324–331. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Johnson PC, Sarosi GA. 1994. Progressive disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. HIV Adv. Res. Ther. 4:15–21 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kathuria S, Capoor MR, Yadav S, Singh A, Ramesh V. 2013. Disseminated histoplasmosis in an apparently immunocompetent individual from north India: a case report and review. Med. Mycol. 51:774–778. 10.3109/13693786.2013.777166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schumacher LL, Love BC, Ferrell M, DeSilva U, Fernando R, Ritchey JW. 2013. Canine intestinal histoplasmosis containing hyphal forms. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 25:304–307. 10.1177/1040638713479604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ. 1997. Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in the 5′ end of the large-subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1216–1223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES