Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Sep;58(9):5626–5628. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02635-14

Cysticidal Activity of Antifungals against Different Genotypes of Acanthamoeba

Alfonso Iovieno a,b,, Darlene Miller a, Dolena R Ledee a, Eduardo C Alfonso a
PMCID: PMC4135811  PMID: 25001304

Abstract

Antifungal drugs have been proposed as a novel treatment for Acanthamoeba keratitis. The cysticidal activity of several antifungal compounds was tested against different genotypes of culture collection and clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba. Only voriconazole and posaconazole were found to be cysticidal, with no differences in activity observed between clinical and culture collection isolates.

TEXT

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a rare and sight-threatening corneal infection that affects primarily contact lens wearers (1). Acanthamoeba is a ubiquitous free-living protozoan that exists in two forms, a vegetative trophozoite and a dormant cyst form (2). The incidences of AK can differ greatly in different countries, ranging from 0.15 per million in the United States to 1.4 per million in the United Kingdom (1, 2).

The increase in the number of cases of AK that have been reported worldwide in recent years poses a problem with diagnosis, sterilization techniques, contact lens solutions, and the efficacy of antiamoebic treatments (3). Many antiamoebic drugs have poor cysticidal activity, and none of the ones currently in use (biguanides, diamidines) is indeed commercially available (4).

Previous studies have investigated the antiamoebic properties of antifungal drugs, with various results (59). Among these compounds, voriconazole has been proven effective in some patients with AK (1014).

In this study, we tested the cysticidal activity of several antifungal agents against different Acanthamoeba genotypes.

A total of 10 Acanthamoeba clinical isolates from patients with keratitis and 8 culture collection isolates (American Tissue Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were used for this study. For the clinical isolates, DNA of axenic cultures was extracted using the UNSET or Chelex method and then PCR amplification of the genus-specific ASA:S1 amplicon was used for genotyping (15, 16).

The clinical isolates were all T4 genotypes, whereas the culture collection isolates were classified as genotype T1, T2, T4, T7, T8, T9, T10, or T12 (Table 1). The isolates were grown in peptone-yeast extract-glucose (PYG) flasks under axenic conditions for 2 weeks to obtain complete encystment. PYG flasks were then placed on ice for 10 s and gently shaken to dislodge the cysts from the flask walls, and 0.100-μl aliquots of PYG containing 105 cysts per ml were then prepared by manual counting with a hemocytometer.

TABLE 1.

Acanthamoeba culture collection and clinical isolates used in the study and their genotypes

ATCC isolate ATCC no. Genotype Clinical isolatea Source Genotype
A. castellanii 50494 T1 BP:P7:LCL Contact lens T4
A. pustulosa 50252 T2 BP:P9:RCL Contact lens T4
A. castellanii Neff 30010 T4 BP:P10:RCB Corneal button T4
A. astronyxis 30137 T7 BP:P13:CB Corneal button T4
A. tubyiashi 30867 T8 BP:P3:RCS[2] Corneal scrape T4
A. comandoni 30135 T9 BP:P10:RCS Corneal scrape T4
A. culbertsoni 30171 T10 BP:P11:RCS Corneal scrape T4
A. healyi 1283 T12 BP:P16:RCS Corneal scrape T4
BP:P18:LCS Corneal scrape T4
BP:P22:LCS Corneal scrape T4
a

RCL and LCL, right and left contact lens; (R)CB, (right) corneal button; RCS and LCS, right and left corneal scrape.

The Sensititre Yeastone plate (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, OH) is a microtiter broth dilution plate for antifungal sensitivity testing (17, 18). The plate contains seven dried antifungal drugs at 2-fold dilutions (Table 2). Serial dilutions of voriconazole and posaconazole (1, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 μg/ml) were prepared separately.

TABLE 2.

Antifungals drugs contained in the YeastOne microtiter plate

Antifungal drug Concn range (μg/ml)
Amphotericin B 0.12–8
5-Flucytosine 0.06–64
Anidulafungin 0.015–8
Caspofungin 0.008–8
Micafungin 0.008–8
Fluconazole 0.12–256
Itraconazole 0.015–16

Cyst aliquots in PYG were incubated with antifungal drugs at 35°C for 48 h. Subsequently, the aliquots were plated on nonnutrient agar (NNA) plates layered with Escherichia coli, incubated at 35°C, and observed with an inverted microscope daily for 1 week to detect growth. Growth was defined as the presence of excysted trophozoites found growing on the culture plates. At the 3-day time point, a fresh inoculum of Escherichia coli (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Round Rock, TX) (about 900 × 106 CFU/ml; McFarland turbidity standard) was applied on the plates to ensure a robust and sufficient nutrient supply. The minimal cysticidal concentration (MCC) for each drug was defined as the lowest concentration of the drug that resulted in no excystment and trophozoite replication within 7 days of incubation. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. A t test for unpaired data was used to compare MCC values among groups (SPSS software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

None of the antifungals in the Sensititre Yeastone plate (amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, and itraconazole) exhibited cysticidal activity at any of the tested concentrations.

The MCCs for voriconazole were 33.13 ± 22.83 μg/ml for clinical isolates and 46.25 ± 23.26 μg/ml for culture collection strains (the mode value for both groups was 40 μg/ml). The MCCs for posaconazole were 43.75 ± 25.04 μg/ml for clinical isolates and 52.5 ± 23.75 μg/ml for culture collection strains (the mode value for both groups was 40 μg/ml) (Fig. 1 and Table 3). No significant differences between clinical and culture collection isolates in the average cysticidal concentrations for voriconazole and posaconazole were found (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Minimal cysticidal concentration (MCC) for voriconazole (clinical isolates, 33.13 ± 22.83 μg/ml; ATCC isolates, 46.25 ± 23.26 μg/ml; P > 0.05) and posaconazole (clinical isolates, 43.75 ± 25.04 μg/ml; ATCC isolates, 52.5 ± 23.75 μg/ml; P > 0.05). Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations.

TABLE 3.

Voriconazole and posaconazole minimal cysticidal concentration for Acanthamoeba culture collection and clinical isolatesa

ATCC isolate MCC
Clinical isolate MCC
V P V P
A. castellanii 40 40 BP:P7:LCL 40 40
A. pustulosa 10 40 BP:P9:RCL 5 40
A. castellanii Neff 40 80 BP:P10:RCB 20 40
A. astronyxis 40 40 BP:P13:CB 20 80
A. tubiashi 40 80 BP:P3:RCS[2] 20 40
A. comandoni 80 40 BP:P10:RCS 40 80
A. culbertsoni 40 20 BP:P11:RCS 40 10
A. healyi 80 80 BP:P16:RCS 80 20
BP:P18:LCS 10 20
BP:P22:LCS 40 20
Mean 46.25 52.50 33.13 43.75
SD 23.26 23.75 22.83 25.04
Mode 40 40 40 40
a

Concentrations are expressed as μg/ml. MCC, minimal cysticidal concentration; V, voriconazole; P, posaconazole.

Our study showed that newer triazoles such as voriconazole and posaconazole do possess cysticidal activity and could represent a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of AK. These drugs inhibit the synthesis of ergosterol, which is a major component of the Acanthamoeba cell membrane. Our results are in line with what previously reported by other authors in previous studies (6, 8, 9). In the studies by Cabello-Vilchez and Martín-Navarro, the voriconazole 90% inhibitory concentration (IC) for cysts was shown to be around 5 to 15 μg/ml for the tested isolates. The higher inhibitory concentration found in our study might be a consequence of the different methodology and the higher number of isolates tested. The cysticidal activity of posaconazole against Acanthamoeba had never previously been tested.

None of the other antifungal drugs tested in the Sensititre Yeastone microdilution plate showed any cysticidal activity. A cysticidal effect could have been evident only at concentrations much higher than the ones resulting in activity against filamentary fungi or yeasts. Among all the antifungal drugs, only caspofungin was previously identified as a potential antiamoebic agent and tested against cysts in vitro. Echinocandins impair the synthesis of β-glucan, which is expressed at high levels during encystment. In a previous study, caspofungin was cysticidal only at a concentration of 500 μg/ml (7).

In conclusion, our in vitro findings support the potential use of newer triazoles as antiamoebic agents. Further in vivo studies would be needed to confirm the potential role of these compounds in the treatment of AK.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

None of us has any financial interests relevant to this study.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 7 July 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dart JK, Saw VP, Kilvington S. 2009. Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 148:487–499. 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siddiqui R, Khan NA. 2012. Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasit. Vectors 5:6. 10.1186/1756-3305-5-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yoder JS, Verani J, Heidman N, Hoppe-Bauer J, Alfonso EC, Miller D, Jones DB, Bruckner D, Langston R, Jeng BH, Joslin CE, Tu E, Colby K, Vetter E, Ritterband D, Mathers W, Kowalski RP, Acharya NR, Limaye AP, Leiter C, Roy S, Lorick S, Roberts J, Beach MJ. 2012. Acanthamoeba keratitis: the persistence of cases following a multistate outbreak. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 19:221–225. 10.3109/09286586.2012.681336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pérez-Santonja JJ, Kilvington S, Hughes R, Tufail A, Matheson M, Dart JK. 2003. Persistently culture positive Acanthamoeba keratitis: in vivo resistance and in vitro sensitivity. Ophthalmology 110:1593–1600. 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00481-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schuster FL, Guglielmo BJ, Visvesvara GS. 2006. In-vitro activity of miltefosine and voriconazole on clinical isolates of free-living amebas: Balamuthia mandrillaris, Acanthamoeba spp., and Naegleria fowleri. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 53:121–126. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00082.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martín-Navarro CM, López-Arencibia A, Arnalich-Montiel F, Valladares B, Piñero JE, Lorenzo-Morales J. 2013. Evaluation of the in vitro activity of commercially available moxifloxacin and voriconazole eye-drops against clinical strains of Acanthamoeba. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 251:2111–2117. 10.1007/s00417-013-2371-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bouyer S, Imbert C, Daniault G, Cateau E, Rodier MH. 2007. Effect of caspofungin on trophozoites and cysts of three species of Acanthamoeba. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:122–124. 10.1093/jac/dkl451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kowalski RP, Abdel Aziz S, Romanowski EG, Shanks RM, Nau AC, Raju LV. 2013. Development of a practical complete-kill assay to evaluate anti-Acanthamoeba drugs. JAMA Ophthalmol. 131:1459–1462. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cabello-Vílchez AM, Martín-Navarro CM, López-Arencibia A, Reyes-Batlle M, Sifaoui I, Valladares B, Piñero JE, Lorenzo-Morales J. 2014. Voriconazole as a first-line treatment against potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains from Peru. Parasitol. Res. 113:755–759. 10.1007/s00436-013-3705-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tu EY, Joslin CE, Shoff ME. 2010. Successful treatment of chronic stromal Acanthamoeba keratitis with oral voriconazole monotherapy. Cornea 29:1066–1068. 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cbfa2c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arnalich-Montiel F, Martín-Navarro CM, Alió JL, López-Vélez R, Martínez-Carretero E, Valladares B, Piñero JE, Lorenzo-Morales J. 2012. Successful monitoring and treatment of intraocular dissemination of Acanthamoeba. Arch. Ophthalmol. 130:1474–1475. 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Webster D, Umar I, Kolyvas G, Bilbao J, Guiot MC, Duplisea K, Qvarnstrom Y, Visvesvara GS. 2012. Treatment of granulomatous amoebic encephalitis with voriconazole and miltefosine in an immunocompetent soldier. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 87:715–718. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gupta S, Shrivastava RM, Tandon R, Gogia V, Agarwal P, Satpathy G. 2011. Role of voriconazole in combined Acanthamoeba and fungal corneal ulcer. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 34:287–289. 10.1016/j.clae.2011.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bang S, Edell E, Eghrari AO, Gottsch JD. 2010. Treatment with voriconazole in 3 eyes with resistant Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 149:66–69. 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ledee DR, Iovieno A, Miller D, Mandal N, Diaz M, Fell J, Fini ME, Alfonso EC. 2009. Molecular identification of t4 and t5 genotypes in isolates from Acanthamoeba keratitis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1458–1462. 10.1128/JCM.02365-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iovieno A, Miller D, Lonnen J, Kilvington S, Alfonso EC. 2011. Extraction of Acanthamoeba DNA by use of Chelex resin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:476–477. 10.1128/JCM.01795-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pfaller MA, Chaturvedi V, Diekema DJ, Ghannoum MA, Holliday NM, Killian SB, Knapp CC, Messer SA, Miskov A, Ramani R. 2008. Clinical evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of the echinocandins anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2155–2159. 10.1128/JCM.00493-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carrillo-Muñoz AJ, Quindós G, Ruesga M, del Valle O, Pemán J, Cantón E, Hernández-Molina JM, Santos P. 2006. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with Sensititre Yeast One. Mycoses 49:293–297. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01250.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES