Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Sep;58(9):5585–5588. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03090-14

High In Vitro Activity of the Novel Spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914, a DNA Gyrase Inhibitor, against Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates Suggests a New Effective Option for Oral Treatment of Gonorrhea

Susanne Jacobsson a, Daniel Golparian a, Richard A Alm b, Michael Huband b, John Mueller b, Jorgen Skov Jensen c, Makoto Ohnishi d, Magnus Unemo a,
PMCID: PMC4135813  PMID: 24982070

Abstract

We evaluated the activity of the novel spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914 (DNA gyrase inhibitor) against clinical gonococcal isolates and international reference strains (n = 250), including strains with diverse multidrug resistance and extensive drug resistance. The AZD0914 MICs were substantially lower than those of most other currently or previously recommended antimicrobials. AZD0914 should be further evaluated, including in vitro selection, in vivo emergence and mechanisms of resistance, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in humans, optimal dosing, and performance, in appropriate randomized and controlled clinical trials.

TEXT

Gonorrhea is a significant public health problem globally (1). Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to all drugs previously used as first-line treatments. In the past decade, resistance to the last options for empirical first-line antimicrobial monotherapy, i.e., the extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs) cefixime and ceftriaxone, has emerged (218). Alarmingly, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) (3) gonococcal isolates with high-level ESC resistance were recently described (9, 13, 19).

The World Health Organization (WHO) (20), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (21), and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (22) have published action plans aiming to control the spread of AMR gonorrhea. One of the few new antimicrobial classes incorporates a novel spiropyrimidinetrione that operates via a novel DNA gyrase/topoisomerase IV mode-of-inhibition (23). DNA gyrase (GyrA2 and GyrB2) and topoisomerase IV (ParC2 and ParE2) are type II DNA topoisomerases, which catalyze changes in the topology of DNA and their function is vital for DNA replication, repair, and decatenation (2427). AZD0914 (Fig. 1) is a novel spiropyrimidinetrione that inhibits DNA biosynthesis, causing accumulations of double-strand cleavages, that was recently shown to have potent in vitro activity against many different bacterial species (23).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Chemical structure of the spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914, a DNA gyrase inhibitor, comprising a 5,5′-pyrimidinetrione derivative with an adjacent benzisoxazole ring (24, 31).

We detailed the in vitro activity of the novel spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914 against a large geographically (global representativeness), temporally (obtained from 1991 to 2013), and genetically diverse collection of clinical gonococcal isolates and international reference strains (n = 250). The quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of the gyrA gene and an AZD0914 resistance-determining region of gyrB (28) were sequenced to verify the lack of cross-resistance to fluoroquinolones and AZD0914 resistance mutations, respectively.

The strains comprised 29 international gonococcal reference strains, including the 2008 WHO reference strains (29), 100 consecutive clinical Swedish gonococcal isolates obtained in 2013, and 121 isolates selected for their resistance phenotype. The collection included all of the currently described XDR gonococcal strains (9, 13, 19), additional isolates with in vitro and clinical ESC resistance (811, 13, 15, 16), different types of ciprofloxacin resistance, and other high-level clinical resistance and multidrug resistance (MDR) to other antimicrobials previously used for treatment. The MICs of AZD0914 (AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP) were determined by the agar dilution technique according to current CLSI guidelines (30). The MICs of ceftriaxone, spectinomycin, cefixime, ampicillin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline were determined by the Etest method (AB bioMérieux), according to the manufacturer′s instructions, and mainly interpreted according to the CLSI breakpoints (Table 1). Selected regions of gyrA and gyrB were sequenced using primers described in Table S1 in the supplemental material.

TABLE 1.

MIC range, MIC50, MIC90, and modal MIC value of AZD0914 among all isolates, consecutive Swedish isolates, selected isolates, and reference strains and proportion of all isolates in different resistance categories for antimicrobials currently or previously recommended for treatment of gonorrhea

Agent and isolates or strains (n) MIC (μg/ml)a
S/I/R (%)b
Range 50% 90% Modal value
AZD0914
    All isolates (250) 0.004 to 0.25 0.125 0.25 0.125 NDc
    Consecutive isolates (100) 0.004 to 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.125 ND
    Selected isolates (121) 0.004 to 0.25 0.125 0.25 0.125 ND
    Reference strains (29) 0.008 to 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.125 ND
    Ciprofloxacin-resistant strains (165) 0.004 to 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.125 ND
Other agents
    Ceftriaxone (250) <0.002 to 4 0.016 0.125 0.008 98.8/1.2d
    Spectinomycin (250) 4 to >1,024 16 16 16 97.6/0.4/2.0
    Cefixime (250) <0.016 to 8 <0.016 0.25 <0.016 95.6/4.4d
    Ampicillin (250) <0.016 to >256 1 8 1 18.0/53.2/28.8
    Azithromycin (250) 0.016 to >256 0.5 4 1 32.4/22.4/45.2
    Ciprofloxacin (250) <0.002 to >32 8 >32 >32 29.6/4.4/66.0
    Tetracycline (250) 0.125 to 256 2 32 2 0/28.4/71.6
a

The MIC was determined using the agar dilution technique for AZD0914 and the Etest method for the additional antimicrobials. (Only whole MIC dilutions are reported in this article.) 50% and 90%, MIC50 and MIC90, respectively.

b

S, susceptible; I, intermediate susceptible; R, resistant. The CLSI breakpoints (M100–S24 [30]) were used for all antimicrobials, with exception of azithromycin, for which the breakpoints from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (34) were applied. The susceptibility categories for ampicillin were inferred from the penicillin G breakpoints stated by the CLSI (30).

c

ND, not determined due to lack of interpretative criteria.

d

Decreased susceptibility or resistance.

The MIC range, modal MIC, MIC50, and MIC90 of AZD0914 were 0.004 to 0.25 μg/ml, 0.125 μg/ml, 0.125 μg/ml, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively. With exception of the ESCs, the MIC50, modal MIC, and MIC90 of other antimicrobials were substantially higher than those observed for AZD0914. A total of 165 (66%) of the isolates were resistant to the previously recommended fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin, and 92 (37%) had a ciprofloxacin MIC of ≥32 μg/ml (AZD0914 MIC90, 0.125 μg/ml). For AZD0914, the highest MIC value (0.25 μg/ml) was found in 31 (12%) isolates. The MIC distributions for AZD0914 and ciprofloxacin and a comparison of the MIC values of AZD0914 and ciprofloxacin are shown in Fig. S1A and S1B, respectively, in the supplemental material. No obvious cross-resistance between AZD0914 and ciprofloxacin or any other tested antimicrobial was identified (see Fig. S1 and Table S2 in the supplemental material). The consecutive Swedish isolates appeared to mainly represent a wild-type MIC distribution for AZD0914 (data not shown), indicating a general lack of AZD0914 resistance mutations. No nonsynonymous mutations in amino acid codons 91 and 95 in GyrA QRDR, resulting in fluoroquinolone resistance, or other nonsynonymous mutations in gyrA showed any correlations with the AZD0914 MIC values (see Table S2). Only seven polymorphic nucleotide positions, including five synonymous substitutions and two nonsynonymous substitutions resulting in S467N and M521I alterations, were found in the examined 480-bp region of gyrB that encodes the region of GyrB that surrounds the residues shown to confer resistance to AZD0914 (28) (see Table S2).

AZD0914 was also previously shown to be active against a small collection of N. gonorrhoeae isolates. However, few of these isolates were MDR or displayed resistance to, e.g., the currently recommended ESCs or high-level resistance to spectinomycin or azithromycin (31), the latter included in the introduced dual-antimicrobial treatment regimens (250 to 500 mg ceftriaxone together with 1 to 2 g azithromycin) (32, 33). The frequency of spontaneous resistance mutations to AZD0914 has also been shown to be low. Accordingly, when five gonococcal strains (four of which showed high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin) were exposed to AZD0914, no mutants could be isolated from any strain at 8× MIC (limit of detection, <3.3 × 10−8 to < 2.1 × 10−9), and mutants could be isolated from only two strains at lower AZD0914 concentrations. These mutants showed 16-fold to 32-fold increases in the MIC of AZD0914 (MIC, 1 to 2 μg/ml). Whole-genome sequencing of the mutants identified a single mutation (D429N or K450T) in the C terminus of GyrB that resulted in the increased AZD0914 MIC, which was also confirmed by transformation experiment (28). In the present study, the region of gyrB that contained these resistance-determining amino acid residues was highly conserved, and the in vitro-selected resistance mutations, D429N and K450T, in GyrB (28) were not found. Only two amino acid alterations in GyrB, S467N and M521I, were found among the 250 isolates, and the AZD0914 MICs of the corresponding isolates were 0.125 μg/ml and 0.06 μg/ml, respectively, which were within the AZD0914 wild-type MIC distribution. AZD0914 has good penetration into target tissues, good bioavailability, and sufficiently high safety and tolerability margins, as indicated from initial preclinical animal toxicology studies, to support further development.

The novel spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914, a DNA gyrase inhibitor, was highly active against gonococci, and the results indicated a lack of cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes. AZD0914 should be evaluated in additional studies, including in vitro selection and the in vivo emergence and mechanisms of AZD0914 resistance. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic properties should be further studied in humans, and appropriate randomized and strictly controlled clinical trials, including patients with both genital and extragenital (especially pharyngeal) gonorrhea, should be performed while evaluating such parameters as optimal dosing, tolerability, efficacy, cost, and safety.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the whole AstraZeneca team involved in the discovery and development of AZD0914.

The present study was supported by the Örebro County Council Research Committee, the Foundation for Medical Research at Örebro University Hospital, Sweden, and Infection iMed, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Waltham, MA.

The work was performed at the WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other Sexually Transmitted Infections, National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 30 June 2014

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.03090-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.World Health Organization. 2012. Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections—2008. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Unemo M, Nicholas RA. 2012. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiol. 7:1401–1422. 10.2217/fmb.12.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tapsall JW, Ndowa F, Lewis DA, Unemo M. 2009. Meeting the public health challenge of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 7:821–834. 10.1586/eri.09.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Unemo M, Shafer WM. 2011. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: origin, evolution, and lessons learned for the future. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1230:E19–E28. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06215.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lewis DA. 2010. The gonococcus fights back: is this time a knock out? Sex. Transm. Infect. 86:415–421. 10.1136/sti.2010.042648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Allen VG, Mitterni L, Seah C, Rebbapragada A, Martin IE, Lee C, Siebert H, Towns L, Melano RG, Low DE. 2013. Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure and susceptibility to cefixime in Toronto, Canada. JAMA 309:163–170. 10.1001/jama.2012.176575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ison CA, Hussey J, Sankar KN, Evans J, Alexander S. 2011. Gonorrhoea treatment failures to cefixime and azithromycin in England. Euro Surveill. 16:19833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lewis DA, Sriruttan C, Müller EE, Golparian D, Gumede L, Fick D, de Wet J, Maseko V, Coetzee J, Unemo M. 2013. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the first two cases of extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in South Africa and association with cefixime treatment failure. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:1267–1270. 10.1093/jac/dkt034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Unemo M, Golparian D, Nicholas R, Ohnishi M, Gallay A, Sednaoui P. 2012. High-level cefixime- and ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae in France: novel penA mosaic allele in a successful international clone causes treatment failure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:1273–1280. 10.1128/AAC.05760-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Unemo M, Golparian D, Stary A, Eigentler A. 2011. First Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with resistance to cefixime causing gonorrhoea treatment failure in Austria, 2011. Euro Surveill. 16:19998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Unemo M, Golparian D, Syversen G, Vestrheim DF, Moi M. 2010. Two cases of verified clinical failures using internationally recommended first-line cefixime for gonorrhoea treatment, Norway, 2010. Euro Surveill. 15:19721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yokoi S, Deguchi T, Ozawa T, Yasuda M, Ito S, Kubota Y, Tamaki M, Maeda S. 2007. Threat to cefixime treatment for gonorrhea. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:1275–1277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ohnishi M, Golparian D, Shimuta K, Saika T, Hoshina S, Iwasaku K, Nakayama S, Kitawaki J, Unemo M. 2011. Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of untreatable gonorrhea? Detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:3538–3545. 10.1128/AAC.00325-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tapsall J, Read P, Carmody C, Bourne C, Ray S, Limnios A, Sloots T, Whiley D. 2009. Two cases of failed ceftriaxone treatment in pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by molecular microbiological methods. J. Med. Microbiol. 58:683–687. 10.1099/jmm.0.007641-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Unemo M, Golparian D, Hestner A. 2011. Ceftriaxone treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by international recommendations, Sweden, July 2010. Euro Surveill. 16:1–3 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Unemo M, Golparian D, Potočnik M, Jeverica S. 2012. Treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with internationally recommended first-line ceftriaxone verified in Slovenia, September 2011. Euro Surveill. 17:1–4 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Read PJ, Limnios EA, McNulty A, Whiley D, Lahra LM. 2013. One confirmed and one suspected case of pharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment failure following 500 mg ceftriaxone in Sydney, Australia. Sex. Health 10:460–462. 10.1071/SH13077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen YM, Stevens K, Tideman R, Zaia A, Tomita T, Fairley CK, Lahra M, Whiley D, Hogg G. 2013. Failure of ceftriaxone 500 mg to eradicate pharyngeal gonorrhoea, Australia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:1445–1447. 10.1093/jac/dkt017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cámara J, Serra J, Ayats J, Bastida T, Carnicer-Pont D, Andreu A, Ardanuy C. 2012. Molecular characterization of two high-level ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates detected in Catalonia, Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67:1858–1860. 10.1093/jac/dks162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. 2012. Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, p 1–36 World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. Cephalosporin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae public health response plan, p 1–43 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA [Google Scholar]
  • 22.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2012. Response plan to control and manage the threat of multidrug-resistant gonorrhoea in Europe, p 1–23 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huband MD, Otterson LG, Doig PC, Giacobbe RA, Patey SA, Gowravaram M, Basarab GS, Mueller JP. 2013. Benzisoxazoles: in vitro activity of new bacterial DNA gyrase/topoisomerase IV inhibitors against Gram-positive, fastidious Gram-negative, atypical, and anaerobic bacterial isolates, poster F-1220. Abstr. 53rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Collin F, Karkare S, Maxwell A. 2011. Exploiting bacterial DNA gyrase as a drug target: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 92:479–497. 10.1007/s00253-011-3557-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mayer C, Janin YL. 2014. Non-quinolone inhibitors of bacterial type IIA topoisomerases: a feat of bioisosterism. Chem. Rev. 114:2313–2342. 10.1021/cr4003984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tomasic T, Masic LP. 2014. Prospects for developing new antibacterials targeting bacterial type IIA topoisomerases. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 14:130–151. 10.2174/1568026613666131113153251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grossman TH, Bartels DJ, Mullin S, Gross CH, Parsons JD, Liao Y, Grillot AL, Stamos D, Olson ER, Charifson PS, Mani N. 2007. Dual targeting of GyrB and ParE by a novel aminobenzimidazole class of antibacterial compounds. Antimicrob. Agents Chemotherapy. 51:657–666. 10.1128/AAC.00596-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alm RA, Kutschke A, Otterson LG, Lahiri SD, McLaughlin RE, Lewis LA, Su X, Huband MD, Mueller JP, Gardner H. 2013. Novel DNA gyrase inhibitor AZD0914: low resistance potential and lack of cross-resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA), poster F-1225c. Abstr. 53rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Unemo M, Fasth O, Fredlund H, Limnios A, Tapsall JW. 2009. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the 2008 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strain panel intended for global quality assurance and quality control of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance for public health purposes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63:1142–1151. 10.1093/jac/dkp098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2014. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 24th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA: http://clsi.org/blog/2014/01/27/m100-s24_em100_2014/ [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huband MD, Flamm RK, Rhomberg R, Mueller JP, Jones RN. 2013. In vitro activity of AZD0914: a new benzisoxazole DNA gyrase inhibitor against Neisseria gonorrhoeae, poster F-1225b. Abstr. 53rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012. Update to CDC's Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 61:590–594 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bignell C, Unemo M, European Guidelines Editorial Board STI 2013. 2012 European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int. J. STD AIDS 24:85–92. 10.1177/0956462412472837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2014. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/Breakpoint_table_v_4.0.pdf

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES