Abstract
Glycopeptides are known to select for heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (h-VISA) from susceptible strains. In certain clinical situations, h-VISA strains have been isolated from patients without previous exposure to glycopeptides, such as cystic fibrosis patients, who frequently receive repeated treatments with beta-lactam antibiotics. Our objective was to determine whether prolonged exposure to beta-lactam antibiotics can induce h-VISA. We exposed 3 clinical vancomycin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, and vancomycin (as a control) at subinhibitory concentrations for 18 days in vitro. Population analyses showed progressive increases in vancomycin resistance; seven of the 12 derived strains obtained after induction were classified as h-VISA according to the following criteria: area under the curve (AUC) on day 18/AUC of Mu3 of ≥90% and/or growth on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar with 4 mg/liter vancomycin. The derived isolates had thickened cell walls proportional to the level of glycopeptide resistance. Genes known to be associated with glycopeptide resistance (vraSR, yvqF, SA1703, graRS, walKR, and rpoB) were PCR sequenced; no de novo mutations were observed upon beta-lactam exposure. To determine whether trfA, a gene encoding a glycopeptide resistance factor, was essential in the selection of h-VISA upon beta-lactam pressure, a trfA-knockout strain was generated by allelic replacement. Indeed, beta-lactam exposure of this mutated strain showed no capacity to induce vancomycin resistance. In conclusion, these results showed that beta-lactam antibiotics at subinhibitory concentrations can induce intermediate vancomycin resistance in vitro. This induction required an intact trfA locus. Our results suggest that prior use of beta-lactam antibiotics can compromise vancomycin efficacy in the treatment of MRSA infections.
INTRODUCTION
Since the appearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin (VAN) has become the treatment of choice for MRSA infections. The first S. aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [VISA]) were reported in Japan in 1997 (1), but these strains remain rare. Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (h-VISA) strains were also reported in Japan in 1997 (2) and are much more frequent. The h-VISA strains contain subpopulations with reduced vancomycin susceptibility but remain undetectable by standard MIC determinations. h-VISA strains have been reported worldwide (3, 4), mostly of MRSA (5) and occasionally of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (6). Today, the prevalence of h-VISA among MRSA strains is highly variable (0.7 to 50%, with a median prevalence of approximately 10%) (4), depending on both the country and the detection methods.
The clinical significance of h-VISA is difficult to determine definitively, but many studies suggest that h-VISA may be at the origin of treatment failures (7, 8). In addition, repeated exposure of h-VISA to vancomycin can select for variants reaching the homogeneous VISA resistance level (2, 5). Several reports have shown a linear relationship between MIC values and treatment failure, even for strains with MICs remaining in the susceptible range (9).
Regarding the ontology of h-VISA strains, the most plausible scenario is that these strains emerged from vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) strains exposed to vancomycin, especially in patients (infected or colonized with S. aureus) receiving long-term treatment with this antibiotic (10). In 2009, Katayama et al. showed that imipenem (IPM), a beta-lactam antibiotic largely used in Japan, can also select for a vancomycin-resistant population from a laboratory VSSA strain (11). Although it is based on a single laboratory strain, this result suggests that beta-lactam exposure can be a risk factor for the development of h-VISA strains. In clinical situations, certain patient populations, such as cystic fibrosis patients, are more chronically exposed to beta-lactam antibiotics than others. In this context, h-VISA strains have been isolated from patients who were not previously exposed to glycopeptides (12, 13). A retrospective study of cystic fibrosis patients' clinical characteristics that was conducted at our hospital suggested that ceftazidime (CAZ), a beta-lactam largely used to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in such patients, may be a risk factor for the development of h-VISA (14).
Taken together, these observations raise the question of whether prolonged exposure to beta-lactam antibiotics can induce reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, thus impairing their efficiency if they are actually required for the treatment of S. aureus infections. We performed in vitro experiments to determine whether prolonged exposure of S. aureus to subinhibitory concentrations of beta-lactams can lead to the emergence of h-VISA. To this end, we exposed three clinical vancomycin-susceptible MRSA strains to 3 beta-lactams (CAZ, ceftriaxone [CRO], and IPM) and to vancomycin (as a control) for 18 days. We then examined the strains' vancomycin resistance levels by population analyses. Confirming our hypothesis, we observed a number of h-VISA strains among our strains. We then investigated the possible molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Definition of h-VISA.
Because there is no consensus definition of h-VISA, we used two definitions. (i) h-VISA was defined as an S. aureus strain with a vancomycin MIC of ≤4 mg/liter by standard Etest on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar and a vancomycin population analysis profile similar to that of Mu3, with a subpopulation growing with 4 mg/liter vancomycin (15). (ii) h-VISA was also defined based on an area under the curve (AUC) ratio for the strain versus Mu3, as determined by population analyses, that was higher than 0.90 (90%) (16); this definition has recently been reported to be one of the most accurate (4).
Bacterial strains.
The S. aureus strains used in the present study were three randomly selected MRSA strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. These strains were classified as VSSA according to the definitions presented above (Table 1). Mu3 was used as a control strain for heterogeneous vancomycin resistance in the population analyses.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of tested strains
Strain | Origin | Resistance | agr type/CCa | Associated resistances | VAN MIC (mg/liter) | Growth on BHI agar with 4 mg/liter VAN | AUC/Mu3 AUC (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOU | Isolated from patient with cystic fibrosis | MRSA, mecA positive | II/CC5 | Kanamycin, tobramycin, erythromycin, lincomycin, fusidic acid, rifampin | 1.5 | No | 51 |
NAR | Isolated from patient with cystic fibrosis | MRSA, mecA positive | I/CC8 | Kanamycin, tobramycin, levofloxacin | 1.5 | No | 41 |
GUA | Isolated from patient with cystic fibrosis | MRSA, mecA positive | II/CC5 | Kanamycin, tobramycin, fusidic acid | 2 | No | 58 |
CC, clonal complex, determined from DNA microarray.
Induction phase.
The strains were induced in microplates using the following ranges of antibiotic concentrations (dilutions in MH broth): ceftazidime (CAZ) (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, England), 4 to 8,200 mg/liter; ceftriaxone (CRO) (Mylan, Pittsburgh, PA), 2 to 12,500 mg/liter; imipenem (IPM)-cilastatin (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany), 0.0625 to 2,048 mg/liter; vancomycin (VAN) (Mylan, Pittsburgh, PA), 0.03125 to 64 mg/liter. Initial inocula (100 μl) were made from a 0.5 McFarland standard suspension diluted 1:50, which corresponded to a final microplate concentration of 106 CFU/ml. The strains were subcultured daily for 18 days by sampling the well with the highest antibiotic concentration at which growth was visually observed. The bacteria from this well were diluted (1:100) in MH broth and inoculated in each well of a new microplate at a 1:200 final dilution. For each strain, a blank was established by serial passaging in drug-free MH broth. Every 6 days, a vancomycin population analysis was performed for each strain exposed to each antibiotic.
h-VISA stability testing.
The stability of the antibiotic-induced strains (AB strains), defined as h-VISA according to one or both of the definitions presented above, was tested by nonselective serial passaging in drug-free MH broth for 18 days. The stability of a homogenous resistant subpopulation selected from the NAR strain after exposure to ceftazidime and growth on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar with vancomycin at 6 mg/liter was tested for 36 days.
Vancomycin population analysis.
Population analyses were performed as described by Wootton et al. (16). After 24 h of culture in liquid BHI medium (Bacto BHI; Becton, Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) at 37°C, the bacterial suspension was adjusted to a 2 McFarland standard. This suspension (50 μl) was spiral plated on BHI agar (Difco BHI agar; Becton, Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 mg/liter vancomycin. To control the inoculum, the suspension was diluted 1:104 and spiral plated on BHI agar without vancomycin. Colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation at 37°C and after 72 h to take into account small resistant colonies, which often grow slowly.
Statistics and mathematical interpretation of population analysis data.
The Mu3 AUC was used as a reference and was calculated for each series of BHI-vancomycin agars. To check the reproducibility of the population analyses, a statistical Shapiro-Wilk normality test was performed on 15 different data sets obtained with Mu3, with a confidence interval of 95%. This test showed no significant differences (P = 0.7956) among the sets of analyses. The AUC values of the different AB strains were calculated, and the ratios of the AUCs for the tested strains to the corresponding AUC for Mu3 were determined. In parallel with that calculation, the ratio of the final AUC (day 18) to the initial value (day 0) was calculated for each tested strain. All analyses were performed using Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Vancomycin and daptomycin MICs.
A 0.5 McFarland standard suspension was prepared in 0.85% NaCl using colonies sampled from a 24-h blood agar plate. The suspension was evenly streaked on MH agar using a cotton swab. Etest strips (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) for vancomycin or daptomycin were applied. The plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C before reading.
Strain monitoring.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed every 6 days by the standardized disc diffusion method, to monitor the strains and to check for cross-contamination. The strains were also checked by DNA microarray analysis at day 0 and day 18 of the induction phase. Bacterial DNA was extracted using a commercial extraction kit according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol (DNA minikit; Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). The diagnostic DNA microarray used in this study (Identibac S. aureus genotyping kit; Alere Technologies, Jena, Germany) and the related procedures and protocols have been described in detail previously (17). This microarray covers 332 different target sequences, corresponding to approximately 185 distinct genes and their allelic variants.
Sequencing of candidate loci involved in h-VISA.
The most common loci known to be associated with h-VISA, namely, vraS, vraR, yvqF, SA1703, graR, graS walR, walK, and rpoB, were sequenced in parental strains and in h-VISA obtained upon beta-lactam and vancomycin induction. PCR fragments were amplified using the primers described by Hafer et al. (18). Sequences were aligned and compared with the reference strain S. aureus subsp. aureus N315 (taxid, 158879) using BLAST (19). Only nonsynonymous mutations were reported.
Transmission electron microscopy.
S. aureus samples were prepared for transmission electron microscopy after overnight culture in BHI liquid medium, as described previously (6). Observations were made on a transmission electron microscope (1400 JEM; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Gatan camera (Orius 600) and digital micrograph software. Images were analyzed further using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Cell wall thickness was determined by measuring at least 30 bacteria of each strain at 6 different points. Results were expressed in nanometers.
Targeted trfA gene disruption mutagenesis.
A chromosomal trfA disruption mutant was constructed by deletion of the trfA gene and insertion of a tetracycline resistance gene, resulting in strain AR612, as described previously (20). The ΔtrfA disruption mutant in strain NAR was obtained by transduction from AR612 using bacteriophage Φ80α and selection for tetracycline resistance. Two colonies, designated AR1453 and AR1454, were selected, and deletion of the trfA gene was confirmed by PCR and reverse transcription-PCR. The AR1454 strain, designated NAR ΔtrfA, was then induced by beta-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin as described above for the wild-type NAR strain.
RESULTS
Induction phase.
Three MRSA clinical isolates, initially classified as VSSA, were subcultured daily for 18 days in the presence of 4 different antibiotics, i.e., 3 beta-lactams (IPM, CAZ, and CRO) and vancomycin. Population analyses were performed every 6 days. Representative curves obtained for the induction phase are shown in Fig. 1. The results of the population analyses showed progressive increases in vancomycin resistance for both beta-lactam- and vancomycin-induced strains, as assessed by the day 18/day 0 AUC ratio. Variations were from 12% to 187% for the antibiotic-induced strains (AB strains), depending on both the antibiotic used and the initial strains (Table 2). A control experiment using the same isolates cultured without antibiotic (blank) showed no significant variation (from −2% to 8%) in the AUC ratio over the 18 days (Table 2).
FIG 1.
Representative population analyses profiles of the induction phase. Population analyses are shown for selected isolates before beta-lactam induction (D0) and during the induction phase on day 6 (D6), day 12 (D12), and day 18 (D18). The numbers of cells growing on BHI agar containing vancomycin are shown on the y axis, and the vancomycin concentrations are shown on the x axis.
TABLE 2.
Vancomycin population analysis during induction phase for clinical strains
Strain | No. of days | Antibiotic exposure | AUC (log10[CFU/ml] × mg/liter) | Day 18 AUC/day 0 AUC (%) | Growth on 4 mg/liter VAN | AUC/Mu3 AUC (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOU | 0 | 12.51 | No | 51 | ||
18 | Blank | 12.75 | 2 | No | 52 | |
18a | VAN | 23.61 | 89 | Yes | 97 | |
18 | IPM | 20.99 | 68 | Yes | 86 | |
18 | CAZ | 14.04 | 12 | No | 58 | |
18 | CRO | 16.32 | 30 | No | 67 | |
NAR | 0 | 10.03 | No | 41 | ||
18 | Blank | 9.87 | −2 | No | 39 | |
18 | VAN | 28.82 | 187 | Yes | 115 | |
18 | IPM | 16.39 | 63 | No | 66 | |
18 | CAZ | 26.18 | 161 | Yes | 105 | |
18 | CRO | 17.74 | 77 | No | 71 | |
GUA | 0 | 14.1 | No | 58 | ||
18 | Blank | 15.21 | 8 | No | 61 | |
18 | VAN | 32.71 | 132 | Yes | 131 | |
18 | IPM | 23.98 | 70 | Yes | 98 | |
18 | CAZ | 17.15 | 22 | No | 69 | |
18 | CRO | 24.69 | 75 | Yes | 10 |
Data for antibiotic-induced strains classified as h-VISA are in bold type.
In considering the two definitions of h-VISA, six AB strains complied with both definitions, namely, FOU with VAN, NAR with CAZ and VAN, and GUA with IPM, CRO, and VAN. In addition, FOU with IPM conformed to only the first definition; this strain grew on BHI agar with 4 mg/liter vancomycin, but its AUC ratio with Mu3 was immediately below the 90% threshold. For each strain, vancomycin induced the maximum increase in resistance, as assessed by the day 18/day 0 AUC ratio; however, the best inducer among the beta-lactams varied among the 3 strains.
Although the population analyses revealed an increase in vancomycin resistance after beta-lactam exposure, the resistance remained undetectable in standard MIC determinations by Etest with a 0.5 McFarland standard inoculum (Table 3) and by antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disc diffusion method. Altogether, these results classify our AB strains as h-VISA and not VISA.
TABLE 3.
Vancomycin and daptomycin MICs determined initially and after induction phase
Strain | No. of days | Antibiotic exposure | Vancomycin |
Daptomycin |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC (mg/liter)a | Day 18 MIC/day 0 MIC (mg/liter) | MICa (mg/liter) | Day 18 MIC/day 0 MIC (mg/liter) | |||
FOU | 0 | 1.5 | 0.064 | |||
18 | Blank | 1.5 | 1 | 0.064 | 1.0 | |
18 | VANb | 3 | 2 | 0.19 | 3.0 | |
18 | IPM | 1.5 | 1 | 0.094 | 1.5 | |
18 | CAZ | 1.5 | 1 | 0.125 | 2.0 | |
18 | CRO | 2 | 1.3 | 0.19 | 3.0 | |
NAR | 0 | 1.5 | 0.047 | |||
18 | Blank | 1.5 | 1 | 0.064 | 1.4 | |
18 | VAN | 4 | 2.7 | 1 | 21.3 | |
18 | IPM | 1.5 | 1 | 0.094 | 2.0 | |
18 | CAZ | 3 | 2 | 0.25 | 5.3 | |
18 | CRO | 2 | 1.3 | 0.19 | 4.0 | |
GUA | 0 | 2 | 0.094 | |||
18 | Blank | 1.5 | 0.75 | 0.094 | 1.0 | |
18 | VAN | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10.6 | |
18 | IPM | 2 | 1 | 0.094 | 1.0 | |
18 | CAZ | 2 | 1 | 0.094 | 1.0 | |
18 | CRO | 2 | 1 | 0.19 | 2.0 |
MICs were determined using Etest.
Data for antibiotic-induced strains classified as h-VISA are in bold type.
A genome-based comparison of the AB strains with their parental counterparts showed no modification in the DNA microarray profiles, confirming the lack of major genomic variations and of contamination by another strain. Similarly, the antibiotic susceptibility testing results for the wild-type and AB strains were superimposable.
h-VISA stability testing.
To assess the stability of the observed increases in resistance to vancomycin, the 7 antibiotic-induced h-VISA strains were tested by serial passages in drug-free MH broth for 18 days (after 3 weeks of storage at −20°C). The results are designated as being collected on day 36 (18 days of induction and 18 days of decrease). The population analyses performed every 6 days revealed progressive decreases in the resistance to vancomycin for most of the strains with all antibiotics, including vancomycin (Table 4; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). However, none of the strains reached its initial level of vancomycin susceptibility, and several strains remained classified as h-VISA. In addition, the stability of a homogeneous resistant subpopulation selected from the NAR strain after exposure to ceftazidime and growth on BHI agar with 6 mg/liter vancomycin was tested for 36 days. This subpopulation also showed a slight AUC decrease of 9% after 18 days of passaging without antibiotics, as found for the NAR strain with CAZ. During this phase, we also tested the stability of Mu3. In contrast to what we observed for most of our AB strains, the vancomycin resistance of Mu3 remained stable during the entire stability testing phase.
TABLE 4.
Vancomycin population analysis at end of stability testing phase
Strain | No. of days | Antibiotic exposure | Day 36 AUC(log10[CFU/ml] × mg/liter) | Day 36 AUC/day 18 AUC (%) | Day 36 AUC/day 0 AUC (%) | Growth on 4 mg/liter VAN | AUC/Mu3 AUC (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOU | 36 | IPM | 16.75 | −20 | 34 | No | 72 |
36 | VAN | 16.74 | −29 | 34 | No | 72 | |
NAR | 36 | CAZa | 26.67 | 2 | 166 | Yes | 114 |
36 | CAZ V6b | 34.14 | −8 | Yes | 146 | ||
36 | VAN | 22.66 | −21 | 126 | Yes | 97 | |
GUA | 36 | IPM | 20.85 | −13 | 48 | Yes | 89 |
36 | CRO | 23.38 | −5 | 66 | Yes | 100 | |
36 | VAN | 20.52 | −37 | 46 | No | 88 | |
Mu3 | 24.76 | 5 | Yes | 106 |
Data for antibiotic-induced strains classified as h-VISA are in bold type.
Homogeneous VAN-resistant subpopulation growing on BHI agar with 6 mg/liter VAN.
Daptomycin resistance.
Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic that can be used to treat MRSA infections if vancomycin treatment has failed or if the strains have been classified as h-VISA (21). Recent reports have indicated that daptomycin susceptibility may be reduced in h-VISA and VISA strains. We thus compared the daptomycin MICs in our strains before and after 18 days of exposure to beta-lactam antibiotics or to vancomycin. The results revealed moderate increases in the daptomycin MICs for strains passaged with vancomycin (day 18/day 0 MIC ratios of 3.0 to 21.3, depending on the isolate), with two of the strains reaching the breakpoint value of 1 mg/liter. The other antibiotics induced only slight reductions in daptomycin susceptibility (day 18/day 0 MIC ratios of 1.0 to 5.3), without reaching the breakpoint value (Table 3).
Cell wall thickness.
h-VISA strains are known to have thickened cell walls. Transmission electron microscopy was performed on some of our h-VISA strains to check for this phenotype (Fig. 2). h-VISA strains obtained by induction had thickened cell walls, compared to their VSSA counterparts (P < 0.001). A significant correlation between cell wall thickness and vancomycin resistance level was found, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8954 (Fig. 2C). These results confirmed that cell wall thickening is a common feature of h-VISA strains, including those induced by beta-lactams.
FIG 2.
Variation of cell wall thickness upon induction. (A) S. aureus images obtained with a transmission electron microscope (1400 JEM; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Gatan camera (Orius 600). The NAR strain is shown before beta-lactam induction (D0) and at day 18 (D18) of induction with ceftazidime (CAZ) or vancomycin (VAN). (B) Analysis of the S. aureus cell wall thickness measured by transmission electron microscopy. The values represent the means of 30 independent bacterial cells with 95% confidence intervals. h-VISA strains obtained at the end of the induction phase showed thickened cell walls, compared to their VSSA counterparts, using a paired Student t test (P < 0.001). (C) Correlation between cell wall thicknesses and vancomycin resistance levels, expressed as AUC (r2 = 0.8954, P < 0.01).
Sequencing of candidate loci involved in h-VISA resistance.
vraS, vraR, yvqF, SA1703, graR, graS walR, walK, and rpoB were sequenced, and nonsynonymous mutations were compared to N315 (Table 5). No de novo mutations were observed upon beta-lactam exposure, while the true h-VISA strains obtained by vancomycin induction showed new mutations in walK.
TABLE 5.
Nonsynonymous mutations of genes involved in h-VISA resistance
Strain | No. of days of treatment | Mutation(s)a |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vraS | vraR | yvqF | SA17003 | graR | graS | rpoB | walK | walR | ||
NAR | 0 | None | E59D | None | None | D148Q | L26F, I59L, T224I | None | None | None |
NAR CAZ (h-VISA) | 18 | None | E59D | None | None | D148Q | L26F, I59L, T224I | None | None | None |
NAR VAN (h-VISA) | 18 | None | E59D | None | None | D148Q | L26F, I59L, T224I | None | R282Cb | None |
GUA | 0 | None | None | Y128C | None | None | None | A477D, G171D | None | None |
GUA CRO (h-VISA) | 18 | None | None | Y128C | None | None | None | A477D, G171D | None | None |
GUA VAN (h-VISA) | 18 | None | None | Y128C | None | None | None | A477D, G171D | T279I,b S221Pb | None |
FOU | 0 | None | None | None | None | None | None | D471Y | None | None |
FOU IPM (h-VISA) | 18 | None | None | None | None | None | None | D471Y | None | None |
FOU VAN (h-VISA) | 18 | None | None | None | None | None | None | D471Y | K13Rb | None |
Amino acid substitutions are indicated using N315 as a reference.
New mutations, which appeared in the course of antibiotic induction.
Induction of ΔtrfA NAR strain.
To determine whether trfA was required for the induction of h-VISA, a trfA-knockout strain was generated in the clinical strain NAR and the resulting mutant was induced by a beta-lactam or vancomycin for 18 days. Beta-lactam induction of the ΔtrfA NAR strain showed no capacity to induce vancomycin resistance, with variation in AUC values of −30% to 12% (Fig. 3). For the vancomycin induction, the variation rate was 39% but the strain was not classified as h-VISA with a day 18 AUC/Mu3 AUC value of 61% and no growth on BHI agar with 4 mg/liter vancomycin. A duplicate of this experiment showed the same results (data not shown).
FIG 3.
Population analysis profiles of the ΔtrfA NAR strain. Population analyses are shown for selected isolates before beta-lactam induction (D0) and during the induction phase on day 6 (D6), day 12 (D12), and day 18 (D18). The numbers of cells growing on BHI agar containing vancomycin are shown on the y axis, and the vancomycin concentrations are shown on the x axis.
DISCUSSION
The induction phase showed that exposure of three clinical vancomycin-susceptible MRSA strains to 3 different beta-lactams (imipenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone) can select for h-VISA. This finding partly matches the observation of Katayama et al. (11), who demonstrated the selection of h-VISA by imipenem. In contrast to our results, however, ceftriaxone did not select for h-VISA strains in their experiment. This result may be explained by the fact that the researchers used only one laboratory strain (ΔIP). As shown in the present study, the level of vancomycin resistance induced by beta-lactams varied greatly between the strains. Because each of the three beta-lactams tested here can induce h-VISA, all beta-lactams may be capable of inducing increased vancomycin resistance. Due to our small strain number, we were unable to perform statistical analyses to test whether the increased resistance depended on the beta-lactam antibiotic used or on the genetic characteristics/backgrounds of the strains.
The results of the stability testing phase showed that h-VISA strains induced by beta-lactams were apparently unstable. Accordingly, it has already been demonstrated that the vancomycin resistance of clinical isolates reverts during serial passages on nonselective medium (22, 23). In addition, this reversion occurs in patients; when vancomycin treatment of a resistant strain is suspended, the h-VISA or VISA strain reverts to a sensitive status after several months (24). Our results are in agreement with these observations, although we did not observe complete reversion to the initial level of sensitivity to vancomycin after 18 days of subculture in antibiotic-free medium. Complete reversion might be achieved only after extended subculture in antibiotic-free medium (22, 25). This reversibility suggests that the mechanism underlying such resistance is counterselective in the absence of antibiotic selective pressure. Genetic support for this reversible phenotype might be either epigenetic or caused by a mutated subpopulation that is purged in the absence of selective antibiotic pressure. The fact that even the homogeneous resistant population resulting from exposure to vancomycin at 6 mg/liter showed decreased resistance in the absence of antibiotics does not support the mutation hypothesis. In addition, the epigenetic hypothesis is supported by the results of PCR sequencing of the candidate loci commonly associated with glycopeptide resistance, which showed no de novo mutations upon beta-lactam pressure (Table 5).
Modification of the cell wall seems to be involved in the mechanism of intermediate resistance to vancomycin. Compared with their VSSA counterparts, our h-VISA strains showed a thickened cell wall (Fig. 2), which is most probably due to activated cell wall synthesis (26–28). It has been reported that the simultaneous exposure of S. aureus to vancomycin and beta-lactams in vitro can lead to vancomycin resistance in certain strains, designated beta-lactam-induced vancomycin-resistant MRSA (BIVR) (29). The proposed mechanism was the linkage of the increase in cell wall precursors observed in the presence of beta-lactams to the vancomycin present in the medium, thus limiting vancomycin's availability for target inhibition (26). The persistence of such a mechanism in the absence of beta-lactams was not evaluated. We can speculate that this mechanism may have been at work in our study, with the decreased resistance in the absence of antibiotics caused by a progressive return to the wild-type expression of cell wall precursors. A very common feature in VISA strains is modification of the expression of genes that regulate the S. aureus cell wall biosynthesis pathway (30). Recently, beta-lactams have been shown to be able to induce similar transcriptomic changes (31, 32), supporting the possibility of beta-lactam-induced reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. These transcriptomic modifications involve several two-component systems, i.e., vraRS, graRS, and walKR (4) as well as trfA (teicoplanin resistance factor A), a gene that was shown to be linked to decreased susceptibility to vancomycin (20). This gene is highly expressed in glycopeptide-resistant strains, compared with their susceptible counterparts (20). trfA gene deletion leads to a significant loss of oxacillin and glycopeptide resistance. The TrfA protein also demonstrates inducible expression following brief exposure to several cell wall-active antibiotics, including oxacillin (33). Our results showed that trfA is required for h-VISA induction upon beta-lactam pressure. Interestingly, trfA gene expression is controlled by the oxidative stress response regulator Spx (33). Cell wall antibiotic exposure leads to stabilization of the Spx protein. It can be speculated that antibiotic control of Spx protein stabilization may be part of the genetic explanation for the reversible phenotype observed in our strains. Antibiotic exposure stabilizes Spx and leads to increased expression of trfA, whereas antibiotic clearance decreases Spx protein amounts, with concomitant decreases in TrfA levels. Study of the molecular function of the trfA gene is crucial for understanding how it modulates glycopeptide resistance. However, based on homology with the Bacillus subtilis mecA gene, we can speculate that trfA facilitates the assembly of functional ClpC and thus influences ClpC molecular processes, including cell wall metabolism (34).
Certain studies have already suggested that h-VISA and VISA strains are linked to a decrease in daptomycin susceptibility (35). The induction of heterogeneous daptomycin resistance has been observed after vancomycin exposure (36). Our results showed a slight decrease in daptomycin susceptibility after beta-lactam exposure, but without reaching the resistance level. However, this finding suggests that the use of beta-lactams can also impair daptomycin efficacy. The potential mechanism for the decrease in daptomycin susceptibility in VISA isolates is unclear. This decrease may be linked to changes in cell wall thickness that impair the diffusion of daptomycin through the cell wall (37). Additional theories, such as alterations in cell wall surface charge or alterations in drug binding, have also been suggested (35).
Clinical extrapolations of our in vitro results must be made with caution. Our results show that beta-lactams can induce h-VISA from the 3 clinical VSSA strains tested. We placed our strains under conditions of subinhibitory concentrations to maximize the risk of resistance emergence. These extreme conditions may be found in vivo because MRSA strains have very high beta-lactam MICs and because antibiotic diffusion may be compromised in certain clinical situations such as cystic fibrosis, due to an abundance of mucus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa-dependent biofilm (38). Cystic fibrosis patients are thus a population at risk of h-VISA development due to a combination of many factors, including S aureus carriage (with variable proportions of MRSA) and repeated beta-lactam treatments (notably targeting Gram-negative bacteria such as P. aeruginosa), potentially at subinhibitory concentrations, against S. aureus.
Our in vitro results suggest that previous exposure to beta-lactam antibiotics at subinhibitory concentration can decrease the efficacy of vancomycin when it is needed to treat MRSA infections. This induction of h-VISA resistance by beta-lactam antibiotics requires an intact trfA locus, thus confirming the role of this gene in glycopeptide resistance pathways. These observations support the difficulty of predicting the global impact of antibiotic therapy on patients' resistomes. Clinical studies need to be conducted to evaluate the relevance of such unpredicted observations in patients undergoing beta-lactam antibiotic therapy.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Centre d'Imagerie Quantitative Lyon Est, Faculté de Médecine RTH Laennec (Lyon, France), for technical assistance in electron microscopy.
This study was supported by a Swiss National Foundation Grant to A.R. (grant 310030_149762/1).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 23 June 2014
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02574-14.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, Yabuta K, Oguri T, Tenover FC, Hospital J. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:135–146. 10.1093/jac/40.1.135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hiramatsu K, Aritaka N, Hanaki H, Kawasaki S, Hosoda Y, Hori S, Fukuchi Y, Kobayashi I. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670–1673. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07324-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Appelbaum PC. 2007. Reduced glycopeptide susceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 30:398–408. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Howden BP, Davies JK, Johnson PDR, Stinear TP, Grayson ML. 2010. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23:99–139. 10.1128/CMR.00042-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu C, Chambers HF. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3040–3045. 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3040-3045.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bobin-Dubreux S, Reverdy M-E, Nervi C, Rougier M. 2001. Clinical isolate of vancomycin-heterointermediate Staphylococcus aureus susceptible to methicillin and in vitro selection of a vancomycin-resistant derivative. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:349–352. 10.1128/AAC.45.1.349-352.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tenover FC, Moellering RC. 2007. The rationale for revising the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration interpretive criteria for Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:1208–1215. 10.1086/513203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moore MR, Chambers HF. 2003. Vancomycin treatment failure associated with heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a patient with endocarditis and in the rabbit model of endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1262–1266. 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1262-1266.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moise-Broder PA, Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Schentag JJ, Forrest A, Moellering RC. 2004. Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1700–1705. 10.1086/421092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fridkin SK, Hageman J, McDougal LK, Mohammed J, Jarvis WR, Perl TM, Tenover FC. 2003. Epidemiological and microbiological characterization of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, United States, 1997–2001. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:429–439. 10.1086/346207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Katayama Y, Murakami-Kuroda H, Cui L, Hiramatsu K. 2009. Selection of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus by imipenem. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3190–3196. 10.1128/AAC.00834-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Spina D, Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Santagati M, Sciacca A, Sciuto C, Stefani S. 2010. Methicillin resistance and vancomycin heteroresistance in Staphylococcus aureus in cystic fibrosis patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29:1277–1285. 10.1007/s10096-010-1000-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Filleron A, Chiron R, Reverdy M-E, Jean-Pierre H, Dumitrescu O, Aleyrangues L, Counil F, Jumas-Bilak E, Marchandin H. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus with decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides in cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst. Fibros. 10:377–382. 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Poncelet M. 2011. Caractéristiques cliniques des patients pédiatriques atteints de mucoviscidose colonisés par Staphylococcus aureus méthicilline-résistant de sensibilité hétérogène aux glycopeptides. M.D. thesis University of Lyon, Lyon, France [Google Scholar]
- 15.Denis O, Nonhoff C, Byl B, Knoop C, Bobin-Dubreux S, Struelens MJ. 2002. Emergence of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a Belgian hospital: microbiological and clinical features. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:383–391. 10.1093/jac/dkf142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wootton M, Howe R, Hillman R, Walsh TR, Bennett PM, MacGowan AP. 2001. A modified population analysis profile (PAP) method to detect hetero-resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus in a UK hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:399–403. 10.1093/jac/47.4.399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Monecke S, Luedicke C, Slickers P, Ehricht R. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in asymptomatic carriers. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28:1159–1165. 10.1007/s10096-009-0752-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hafer C, Lin Y, Kornblum J, Lowy FD, Uhlemann A-C. 2012. Contribution of selected gene mutations to resistance in clinical isolates of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:5845–5851. 10.1128/AAC.01139-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Renzoni A, Kelley WL, Barras C, Monod A, Huggler E, François P, Schrenzel J, Studer R, Vaudaux P, Lew DP. 2009. Identification by genomic and genetic analysis of two new genes playing a key role in intermediate glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:903–911. 10.1128/AAC.01287-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cervera C, Castañeda X, Pericas JM, Del Río A, de la Maria CG, Mestres C, Falces C, Marco F, Moreno A, Miró JM. 2011. Clinical utility of daptomycin in infective endocarditis caused by Gram-positive cocci. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 38:365–370. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.11.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boyle-Vavra S, Berke SK, Lee JC, Daum RS. 2000. Reversion of the glycopeptide resistance phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:272–277. 10.1128/AAC.44.2.272-277.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rodriguez C, Agudelo M, Zuluaga AF, Vesga O. 2012. Generic vancomycin enriches resistant subpopulations of Staphylococcus aureus after exposure in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:243–247. 10.1128/AAC.05129-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Errecalde L, Ceriana P, Gagetti P, Erbín M, Duarte A, Rolon M, Cuatz D, Corso A, Kaufman S. 2013. Primer aislamiento en Argentina de Staphylococcus aureus intermedia a la vancomicina y no sensibilidad a la daptomicina. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 45:99–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hiramatsu K. 2001. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 1:147–155. 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00091-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hanaki H, Daum RS, Labischinski H, Hiramatsu K. 1998. Activated cell-wall synthesis is associated with vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains Mu3 and Mu50. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:199–209. 10.1093/jac/42.2.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cui L, Murakami H, Kuwahara-Arai K, Hanaki H, Hiramatsu K. 2000. Contribution of a thickened cell wall and its glutamine nonamidated component to the vancomycin resistance expressed by Staphylococcus aureus Mu50. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2276–2285. 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2276-2285.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cui L, Ma X, Sato K, Okuma K, Tenover FC, Mamizuka EM, Gemmell CG, Kim MN, Ploy MC, El-Solh N, Ferraz V, Hiramatsu K. 2003. Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5–14. 10.1128/JCM.41.1.5-14.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hanaki H, Yamaguchi Y, Yanagisawa C, Uehara K, Matsui H, Yamaguchi Y, Hososaka Y, Barada K, Sakai F, Itabashi Y, Ikeda S, Atsuda K, Tanaka H, Inamatsu T, Nagayama A, Sunakawa K. 2005. Investigation of β-lactam antibiotic-induced vancomycin-resistant MRSA (BIVR). J. Infect. Chemother. 11:104–106. 10.1007/s10156-004-0371-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McAleese F, Wu SW, Sieradzki K, Dunman P, Murphy E, Projan S, Tomasz A. 2006. Overexpression of genes of the cell wall stimulon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus exhibiting vancomycin-intermediate-S. aureus-type resistance to vancomycin. J. Bacteriol. 188:1120–1133. 10.1128/JB.188.3.1120-1133.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Utaida S, Dunman PM, Macapagal D, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Singh VK, Jayaswal RK, Wilkinson BJ. 2003. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the response of Staphylococcus aureus to cell-wall-active antibiotics reveals a cell-wall-stress stimulon. Microbiology 149:2719–2732. 10.1099/mic.0.26426-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yin S, Daum RS, Boyle-Vavra S. 2006. VraSR two-component regulatory system and its role in induction of pbp2 and vraSR expression by cell wall antimicrobials in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:336–343. 10.1128/AAC.50.1.336-343.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jousselin A, Kelley WL, Barras C, Lew DP, Renzoni A. 2013. The Staphylococcus aureus thiol/oxidative stress global regulator Spx controls trfA, a gene implicated in cell wall antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:3283–3292. 10.1128/AAC.00220-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kock H, Gerth U, Hecker M. 2004. MurAA, catalysing the first committed step in peptidoglycan biosynthesis, is a target of Clp-dependent proteolysis in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 51:1087–1102. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03875.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moise PA, North D, Steenbergen JN, Sakoulas G. 2009. Susceptibility relationship between vancomycin and daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus: facts and assumptions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 9:617–624. 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70200-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sakoulas G, Alder J, Thauvin-Eliopoulos C, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM. 2006. Induction of daptomycin heterogeneous susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus by exposure to vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1581–1585. 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1581-1585.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cui L, Tominaga E, Neoh H, Hiramatsu K. 2006. Correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1079–1082. 10.1128/AAC.50.3.1079-1082.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bolister N, Basker M, Hodges N, Marriott C. 1991. The diffusion of β-lactam antibiotics through mixed gels of cystic fibrosis-derived mucin and Pseudomonas aeruginosa alginate. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27:285–293. 10.1093/jac/27.3.285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.