Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Sep;58(9):5594–5597. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02432-14

Colistin Heteroresistance in Enterobacter cloacae Is Associated with Cross-Resistance to the Host Antimicrobial Lysozyme

Brooke A Napier a,*, Victor Band a, Eileen M Burd c,d,, David S Weiss a,b,c,
PMCID: PMC4135841  PMID: 24982068

Abstract

Here, we describe the first identification of colistin-heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae in the United States. Treatment of this isolate with colistin increased the frequency of the resistant subpopulation and induced cross-resistance to the host antimicrobial lysozyme. This is the first description of heteroresistance conferring cross-resistance to a host antimicrobial and suggests that clinical treatment with colistin may inadvertently select for bacteria that are resistant to components of the host innate immune system.

TEXT

Antibiotic-resistant pathogens are responsible for 2 million infections and at least 23,000 deaths each year in the United States alone (1). The problem of increasing antibiotic resistance is compounded by the lack of new drugs in development, together threatening a return to the preantibiotic era. Colistin is often the only therapeutic option to treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria that are resistant to most or all other antibiotics (24). This cationic antimicrobial peptide disrupts both the outer and inner membranes of Gram-negative bacteria (5), acting similarly to several host antimicrobials, including the cationic C-terminal portion of lysozyme (68). Like colistin, this nonenzymatic portion of lysozyme exerts a potent antimicrobial action against a variety of Gram-negative bacteria by crossing the outer membrane via self-promoted uptake and forming pores within the inner membrane (68). Unfortunately, resistance to colistin has emerged, rendering infections by some strains essentially untreatable.

Several types of resistance to colistin have been identified, including heteroresistance, which has been observed in several Gram-negative pathogens (911). Heteroresistance is broadly defined as the presence of an antibiotic-resistant subset of microbes within a larger population that is susceptible to the antibiotic (1214). Heteroresistance can complicate assessment of the MIC to a specific antibiotic and may promote resistance to antibiotics in vivo, thereby affecting diagnostic tests and patient treatment (12).

We recently isolated a colistin-heteroresistant strain (colR/S) of Enterobacter cloacae from a bronchoalveolar lavage specimen from a kidney transplant patient. This is the first identification of colistin-heteroresistant E. cloacae in the United States and only the second description worldwide (15). E. cloacae is a Gram-negative intestinal commensal bacterium that colonizes 40 to 80% of the human population (16) and has previously been identified as an opportunistic nosocomial pathogen (1719). Treatment of infection by E. cloacae can be complicated by its natural resistance to many antibiotics and its ability to acquire resistance to others after exposure (20, 21).

The colR/S strain was highly antibiotic resistant (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) and displayed heteroresistance to colistin as determined using Etest strips (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (Difco/BD, Sparks, MD) (Fig. 1A; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material), by following the inoculation and reading instructions of the manufacturer. We determined the frequency of the resistant population by growing the colR/S strain in MH broth (Difco/BD) for 16 h and then plating on MH agar with or without colistin (100 μg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The frequency of colistin resistance was calculated by dividing the number of colonies on colistin plates by the number of colonies on the colistin-free plates and was determined to be 0.77% (Fig. 1B), a similar level seen in other examples of heteroresistance (911, 14). When colR/S was subsequently grown for 2 h or 12 h in the presence of 200 μg/ml of colistin, the frequency of colistin resistance increased significantly to 82.5 to 85.7% (Fig. 1B). Subsequent passage without antibiotic revealed that the frequency of resistance returned to below 3% (Fig. 1B), consistent with other examples of heteroresistance (12, 14).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Frequency of the colistin-resistant subpopulation in a novel Enterobacter cloacae clinical isolate. (A) Image of Enterobacter cloacae isolate colR/S plated on MH with a colistin Etest strip. Resistant colonies are present within the zone of clearing. (B) The frequency of the colistin-resistant subpopulation of colR/S was quantified after growth in MH broth for 16 h, subsequent treatment with a sublethal dose of colistin (200 μg/ml; +colistin) for 2 h or 12 h, and subsequent passage in MH without colistin (−colistin).

We next set out to determine the frequency of the resistant population in previously identified colistin-heteroresistant strains of E. cloacae. We obtained four colistin-heteroresistant isolates (NL-1, NL-2, NL-3, and NL-4) (15) and measured their frequencies of baseline colistin resistance to be between 1.25% and 4.71% (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). When treated with colistin, similar to colR/S, these isolates displayed a robust increase in the frequency of resistance (47.4 to 62.0%) (see Fig. S1). Further, the frequency reverted to baseline upon passage in the absence of colistin (see Fig. S1). In contrast, we collected two colistin-sensitive (colistin sensitivity defined as an Etest MIC of ≤0.2 μg/ml and broth microdilution MIC of ≤8 μg/ml; see Table S2 in the supplemental material) E. cloacae strains (colS-1 and colS-2) and failed to observe resistant colonies after plating them on colistin (data not shown) or by Etest (see Fig. S2A and B). Taken together, these data demonstrate that the colistin-heteroresistant E. cloacae strains tested here have large resistant subpopulations, whose frequency is significantly increased upon colistin treatment.

We previously demonstrated that colistin-resistant clinical isolates of the nosocomial bacterium Acinetobacter baumannii (resistance was due to point mutations, and these strains did not exhibit heteroresistance) displayed cross-resistance to the host antimicrobial lysozyme (22). We therefore set out to determine whether colistin heteroresistance could confer cross-resistance to lysozyme. colR/S was grown from frozen stock in MH broth at 37°C with aeration and then diluted to a final concentration of ∼106 CFU/ml in 25% MH broth. Bacteria were either treated with a sublethal dose (200 μg/ml for heteroresistant strains and 1 μg/ml for sensitive strains) of colistin for 2.5 h or were not treated. Subsequently, bacteria were challenged with lysozyme (5 mg/ml) and incubated with aeration at 37°C, and aliquots were plated at 0 h, 1 h, and 2 h for enumeration of CFU. Colistin pretreatment of colR/S prevented killing upon subsequent exposure to lysozyme, compared to bacteria that were not pretreated and whose levels were reduced 100-fold at 2 h (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, colistin pretreatment similarly induced enhanced resistance to lysozyme treatment in the four previously described colistin-heteroresistant E. cloacae strains (Fig. 2B to E). In contrast, the colistin-sensitive E. cloacae isolates were not protected from lysozyme, whether or not they had been pretreated with colistin (Fig. 2F and G). These data indicate that, among the colistin-heteroresistant E. cloacae isolates tested here, pretreatment with colistin induces an increased frequency of colistin resistance as well as cross-resistance to the host antimicrobial lysozyme. This is the first demonstration that heteroresistance to an antibiotic can confer cross-resistance to a component of the host innate immune system.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Colistin treatment of heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae isolates induces cross-resistance to lysozyme. E. cloacae strains were grown in MH broth in the absence (Ctrl; solid line) or presence (dashed line) of a sub-MIC level of colistin (200 μg/ml for heteroresistant strains and 1 μg/ml for sensitive strains) for 2.5 h. Colistin-heteroresistant strains (A to E) and colistin-sensitive strains (F and G) were then treated with 5 mg/ml of lysozyme for the indicated times and plated for enumeration of CFU. Time zero CFU is indicated by the solid gray line. Data were analyzed for significance using the unpaired Student t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001; ***, P < 0.0001. Error bars represent the standard deviations of the results determined from triplicate samples.

The data presented here suggest that E. cloacae heteroresistance to colistin may impact the outcome of clinical infection, since exposure to this antibiotic can lead to increased resistance to host innate immune defenses. This is likely a phenomenon that occurs broadly and is relevant to a range of pathogens for which colistin-heteroresistant strains have been isolated, including Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae (911). Use of susceptibility testing methods capable of identification of heteroresistance may be essential in guiding optimal patient treatment, to avoid unknowingly inducing resistance to the host innate immune system.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank William Shafer for critical reading of the manuscript. Colistin-heteroresistant strains NL-1, NL-2, NL-3, and NL-4 were graciously provided by Peter H. J. van Keulen from the Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control at Amphia Hospital in Breda, The Netherlands.

D.S.W. was supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Investigator in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease award.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 30 June 2014

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02432-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.CDC. 16 September 2013, posting date. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. CDC, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/ [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zavascki AP, Goldani LZ, Li J, Nation RL. 2007. Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:1206–1215. 10.1093/jac/dkm357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tamayo M, Santiso R, Otero F, Bou G, Lepe JA, McConnell MJ, Cisneros JM, Gosálvez J, Fernández JL. 2013. Rapid determination of colistin resistance in clinical strains of Acinetobacter baumannii by use of the micromax assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:3675–3682. 10.1128/JCM.01787-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Biswas S, Brunel JM, Dubus JC, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Rolain JM. 2012. Colistin: an update on the antibiotic of the 21st century. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 10:917–934. 10.1586/eri.12.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fidai S, Farmer SW, Hancock RE. 1997. Interaction of cationic peptides with bacterial membranes. Methods Mol. Biol. 78:187–204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Düring K, Porsch P, Mahn A, Brinkmann O, Gieffers W. 1999. The non-enzymatic microbicidal activity of lysozymes. FEBS Lett. 449:93–100. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00405-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ibrahim HR, Thomas U, Pellegrini A. 2001. A helix-loop-helix peptide at the upper lip of the active site cleft of lysozyme confers potent antimicrobial activity with membrane permeabilization action. J. Biol. Chem. 276:43767–43774. 10.1074/jbc.M106317200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laible NJ, Germaine GR. 1985. Bactericidal activity of human lysozyme, muramidase-inactive lysozyme, and cationic polypeptides against Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus faecalis: inhibition by chitin oligosaccharides. Infect. Immun. 48:720–728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li J, Rayner CR, Nation RL, Owen RJ, Spelman D, Tan KE, Liolios L. 2006. Heteroresistance to colistin in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2946–2950. 10.1128/AAC.00103-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hawley JS, Murray CK, Jorgensen JH. 2008. Colistin heteroresistance in acinetobacter and its association with previous colistin therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:351–352. 10.1128/AAC.00766-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meletis G, Tzampaz E, Sianou E, Tzavaras I, Sofianou D. 2011. Colistin heteroresistance in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66:946–947. 10.1093/jac/dkr007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Falagas ME, Makris GC, Dimopoulos G, Matthaiou DK. 2008. Heteroresistance: a concern of increasing clinical significance? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:101–104. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01912.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Deresinski S. 2009. Vancomycin heteroresistance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 199:605–609. 10.1086/596630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morand B, Mühlemann K. 2007. Heteroresistance to penicillin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:14098–14103. 10.1073/pnas.0702377104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lo-Ten-Foe JR, de Smet AM, Diederen BM, Kluytmans JA, van Keulen PH. 2007. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, Etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3726–3730. 10.1128/AAC.01406-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gaston MA. 1988. Enterobacter: an emerging nosocomial pathogen. J. Hosp. Infect. 11:197–208. 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90098-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.John JF, Sharbaugh RJ, Bannister ER. 1982. Enterobacter cloacae: bacteremia, epidemiology, and antibiotic resistance. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4:13–28. 10.1093/clinids/4.1.13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Keller R, Pedroso MZ, Ritchmann R, Silva RM. 1998. Occurrence of virulence-associated properties in Enterobacter cloacae. Infect. Immun. 66:645–649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sanders WE, Sanders CC. 1997. Enterobacter spp.: pathogens poised to flourish at the turn of the century. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:220–241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mezzatesta ML, Gona F, Stefani S. 2012. Enterobacter cloacae complex: clinical impact and emerging antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol. 7:887–902. 10.2217/fmb.12.61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stock I, Grüger T, Wiedemann B. 2001. Natural antibiotic susceptibility of strains of the Enterobacter cloacae complex. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 18:537–545. 10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00463-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Napier BA, Burd EM, Satola SW, Cagle SM, Ray SM, McGann P, Pohl J, Lesho EP, Weiss DS. 2013. Clinical use of colistin induces cross-resistance to host antimicrobials in Acinetobacter baumannii. mBio 4(3):e00021-13. 10.1128/mBio.00021-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES