Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is a medically important human pathogen causing different diseases, including trachoma, the leading cause of preventable blindness in developing countries, and sexually transmitted infections that can lead to infertility and ectopic pregnancies. There is no vaccine against C. trachomatis at present. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are used as standard therapy to treat the infection but have unwanted side effects, such as inducing persistent or recurring infections and affecting the host microbiome, necessitating the development of novel anti-Chlamydia therapies. Here, we describe the establishment of a robust, fast, and simple plaque assay using liquid overlay medium (LOM) for the identification of anti-Chlamydia compounds. Using the LOM plaque assay, we identified nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD)-labeled 1-O-methyl-ceramide-C16 as a compound that efficiently inhibits C. trachomatis replication without affecting the viability of the host cell. Further detailed analyses indicate that 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 acts outside the inclusion. Thereby, 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 represents a lead compound for the development of novel anti-Chlamydia drugs and furthermore constitutes an agent to illuminate sphingolipid trafficking pathways in Chlamydia infections.
INTRODUCTION
Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular human pathogen of high medical and socioeconomic importance (1). C. trachomatis can cause infections of the urogenital tract and trachoma, the leading cause of preventable blindness in developing countries. In women, untreated and recurring genital C. trachomatis infections can escalate, leading to severe sequelae, including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility, and ectopic pregnancies (2). Currently, no vaccine against C. trachomatis is available. For standard therapy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States recommends either a single dose of 1 mg azithromycin or 100 mg doxycycline twice a day for at least 7 days for uncomplicated urogenital-tract C. trachomatis infections. These broad-spectrum antibiotics affect the normal microbial flora and can select for resistant strains or induce Chlamydia persistence (3–7). Like all members of the Chlamydiales, C. trachomatis has a unique cycle of development, characterized by the presence of two distinct bacterial forms (8). The infectious elementary body (EB) adheres to the host cell and triggers its invasion. After entering the cell, the bacteria are found inside a membrane-bound vacuole, the inclusion. EBs differentiate into metabolically active reticulate bodies (RBs), which divide by binary fission and redifferentiate into EBs at the end of the cycle. After release from the host cell, EBs can infect new mammalian cells, and the cycle starts again.
Chlamydia spp. are among the few bacteria that require sphingomyelin for growth, rendering this pathway a potential target for the development of specific anti-Chlamydia therapies (9). Sphingomyelin is synthesized by the transfer of a phosphocholine head group from phosphatidylcholine to ceramide (10). In uninfected cells, ceramide is transported from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus via vesicles or by CERT, a ceramide transport protein (11). Sphingomyelin synthase 1 (SMS1) catalyzes the production of sphingomyelin at the trans-Golgi apparatus, and sphingomyelin is then found enriched in the plasma membrane and membranes of the endosomal system (12). In C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells, sphingomyelin accumulates in the bacteria (13–15). Sphingomyelin acquisition by C. trachomatis and Chlamydia muridarum depends on vesicular and nonvesicular transport processes (15–18). In C. muridarum-infected cells, bacterial sphingolipid uptake is partially blocked by brefeldin A and HPA-12 [N-(3-hydroxy-1-hydroxymethyl-3-phenylpropyl)dodecanamide], drugs that inhibit vesicular Arf1-dependent and nonvesicular CERT-dependent ceramide trafficking, respectively (17). Interestingly, HPA-12 but not brefeldin A treatment reduces the formation of infectious C. muridarum EBs (17).
Different means exist to analyze the Chlamydia cycle of development, including reinfection assays, electron microscopy, and real-time PCR. The gold standard to determine the effects of a specific treatment on progeny formation is titration of newly formed EBs by reinfection of fresh cells. Newly developed inclusions can then be counted directly by bright-field imaging or after immunostaining. Alternatively, EBs can also be titrated by plaque assay (19, 20). The current protocol for plaque titration of different Chlamydia strains uses a soft-agar overlay medium. This is a time-consuming method that is furthermore not easily transferred to a high-throughput screening format (19, 20).
Here, we describe a method for fast, robust, and easy titration of Chlamydia spp. using a liquid overlay medium (LOM) plaque assay followed by immunodetection of formed plaques. Using this assay, we identified 1-O-methyl-ceramide-C16 labeled with the fluorophore nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD) as a new anti-Chlamydia compound. In C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells, 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 is not transported to the bacteria inside the inclusion and inhibits C. trachomatis EB formation. Thus, 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 constitutes a lead compound for the development of novel anti-Chlamydia drugs and furthermore represents a new agent to illuminate sphingolipid trafficking pathways in Chlamydia infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents and antibodies.
Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Chloramphenicol (catalog no. 3886) was purchased from Carl Roth; the sphingomyelin synthase inhibitor D609 (catalog no. BML-ST330-0005) was obtained from Enzo Life Sciences. Ceramide compounds used in this study were NBD-ceramide-C16 and 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 (details on the chemical synthesis will be published elsewhere). All ceramide compounds were prepared as stock solutions containing 0.5 mM ceramide compound complexed to 0.5 mM defatted bovine serum albumin (BSA) and stored at −20°C under desiccated conditions protected from light. The following antibodies were used in this study: mouse anti-Hsp60 (bacterial) (1:600; catalog no. ALX-804-072; Enzo Life Sciences), rabbit anti-IncA (1:500), rabbit anti-giantin (1:500; catalog no. PRB-114C; Covance), IRDye 680RD-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1,000; catalog no. 926-68070; Li-Cor Biosciences), Alexa Fluor 488-coupled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100; catalog no. 111-545-144; Dianova), Cy3-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:200; catalog no. 115-165-146; Dianova), and Alexa Fluor 647-coupled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100; catalog no. 111-605-144; Dianova).
Polyclonal rabbit anti-IncA antibody was produced by immunization of rabbits with the C-terminal cytoplasmic fragment of IncA (N80–S246) fused to Schistosoma japonicum glutathione S-transferase (GST). All animal handling was performed by Biogenes, Berlin. The antigen was produced in Escherichia coli Rosetta 2 (Merck) using the pGEX-3X N-terminal GST expression vector (GE Healthcare). Cloning was done by using EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites in E. coli Top10 (Invitrogen). The primers used were 5′-CCCGGGGATCCATAATTTCATGCTGAGCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCCGGGAATTCCTAGGAGCTTTTTGTAGAGG-3′ (reverse). GST-IncA fusion protein was expressed and purified using HiCap glutathione matrix slurry (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. IncA-specific antibodies were affinity purified by depleting inactivated (56°C, 30 min) rabbit serum from GST-specific antibodies for 8 h, followed by binding to the cross-linked GST-IncA beads overnight. Beads were washed with 0.1 M borate, 0.5 M NaCl (pH 8.0) and eluted with 0.2 M glycine (pH 2.0) into 2 M Tris to neutralize the pH. Purified antibody was dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and diluted 1:1 in glycerol, 0.06% (wt/vol) sodium azide for storage at −20°C.
Cell culture and infection.
HeLa 229 cervical epithelial cells (ATCC CCL-2.1) and McCoy mouse fibroblasts (ATCC CRL-1696) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Biochrom), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 2 mM l-glutamine at 37°C and 5% (vol/vol) CO2 in a humidified incubator. For time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, HeLa cells stably expressing Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein (GFP) were used. C. trachomatis lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) biovar strain L2/434/Bu (ATCC VR-902B), C. trachomatis trachoma type A strain HAR-13 (ATCC VR-885), C. trachomatis trachoma type D strain UW-3/Cx (ATCC VR-571B), C. psittaci strain DC15, genotype A-VS1 (cattle isolate, 2002; kindly provided by Konrad Sachse, Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany), and C. muridarum mouse pneumonitis (MoPn) strain Nigg II (ATCC VR-123) were propagated in and purified from HeLa cell monolayers. Infections were performed in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco) with glucose (4.5 g/liter) supplemented with 5% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 2 mM l-glutamine (infection medium). Cells were washed twice with infection medium and incubated with bacteria using various multiplicities of infection (MOI) at 35°C and 5% (vol/vol) CO2 in a humidified incubator. After 2 h, cells were again washed with infection medium and incubated at 35°C.
Agar-based plaque assay.
For agar-based plaque assays, cells were seeded in multiwell plates for 70% confluence the next day. Cells were then incubated with dilutions of Chlamydia in infection medium for 2 h, followed by washing twice with infection medium. Subsequently, cells were overlaid with agar-containing medium according to Matsumoto et al. (19). Briefly, agar-based overlay medium was freshly prepared by mixing DMEM containing DEAE-dextran, NaHCO3, and FCS with 2% (wt/vol) purified agar (L28) (LP0028B; Oxoid) preheated to 55°C (final concentrations: 0.01% [wt/vol] DEAE-dextran, 0.05% [wt/vol] NaHCO3, 5% [vol/vol] FCS, 0.55% [wt/vol] agar). The mixture was immediately added to the cells and overlaid with infection medium after solidifying. Cells were incubated at 35°C for 8 days.
Liquid overlay medium-based plaque assay.
For liquid overlay medium-based plaque assays, cells were seeded in 48-well plates (6- to 96-well plates were also successfully tested) for 70% confluence the next day. Cells were then incubated with dilutions of Chlamydia in 250 μl infection medium for 2 h, followed by washing twice with infection medium. Subsequently, cells were overlaid with 350 μl liquid overlay medium (DMEM containing 0.01% [wt/vol] DEAE-dextran, 0.05% [wt/vol] NaHCO3, 5% [vol/vol] FCS, 0.6% [wt/vol] Avicel microcrystalline cellulose [RC-581; FMC BioPolymer]) following incubation at 35°C for 3 to 5 days. For inhibitor studies, liquid overlay medium was premixed with the respective compound and added at 8 h postinfection (p.i.) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).
Plaque staining.
For neutral red vital staining of agar-based plaques, infection medium was removed and agar was overlaid with neutral red staining solution (3% [wt/vol] neutral red in PBS, pH 7.4) and incubated for 4 h at 35°C. For crystal violet staining, infection medium was removed and the overlay was incubated with crystal violet staining solution (0.5% [wt/vol] crystal violet, 10% [wt/vol] formaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4) overnight at room temperature. For immunofluorescence staining, cells were carefully washed three times with PBS to remove the overlay medium, fixed with 2% (wt/vol) formaldehyde in PBS for 30 min, and permeabilized with 0.2% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min. Then, cells were stained for bacterial Hsp60 (secondary antibody: IRDye 680RD-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG; see “Immunofluorescence staining” below for experimental details). After a final wash with distilled H2O, fluorescent signals were detected using an Odyssey infrared imaging system (model 9120; LiCor Biosciences).
Automated quantification of plaque numbers.
For automated quantification of plaque numbers, image files of plaques were converted to grayscale using Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe) followed by image smoothing using the FIJI image processing package of the ImageJ software (21). Once smoothened, brightness levels were adjusted using the option “Threshold.” Finally, particles were counted using the standard settings of the “Analyze Particles” function.
Reinfection assay.
To determine the inhibitory effect of compounds on the formation of infectious progeny, cells were seeded in 6-well plates and infected with C. trachomatis L2 (MOI, 2). At 8 h p.i., compounds were added at a concentration of 4.65 μM (the 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16), and cells were harvested at various time points using a cell scraper. After glass bead lysis, lysates were titrated on freshly seeded HeLa 229 cells, fixed at 24 h p.i., and stained for Hsp60. Numbers of infection-forming units (IFU) per ml were calculated from average inclusion counts in 10 fields of view per condition.
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay.
For assessing the cytotoxic potential of the inhibitory compounds used in this study, an LDH cytotoxicity assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (cytotoxicity detection kit PLUS; catalog no. 04 744 926 001; Roche Diagnostics). Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plates, infected with C. trachomatis L2 (MOI 2) or left uninfected, and incubated with the respective compounds at 8 h p.i. At 48 h p.i., cells were incubated with 100 μl of the supplied reaction mixture for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl of stop solution, followed by measuring absorbance at 492 nm using an Infinite 200 Pro plate reader (Tecan). Measured values were corrected for background and normalized to positive controls (cells lysed using the lysis reagent provided with the kit).
Ceramide uptake assay.
To monitor intracellular distribution of ceramide compounds, C. trachomatis L2 (MOI, 2; 24 h p.i.)-infected and uninfected HeLa 229 cells were incubated with the respective ceramide compounds at a concentration of 25 μM at 35°C for 1 h, as previously described (22). Then, Hoechst 33342 (25 μg/ml) was added to stain for DNA, and confocal images were acquired using an LSM 780 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).
Immunofluorescence staining.
Samples were treated as previously published (23). Briefly, cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 2% (wt/vol) formaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, and permeabilized with 0.2% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 and 0.2% (wt/vol) BSA in PBS for 15 min. Then, cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in 0.2% (wt/vol) BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. After being washed with PBS, cells were incubated with secondary antibodies and the DNA stain 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1:10,000) diluted in 0.2% (wt/vol) BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature and washed with PBS again. Images were acquired using an LSM 780 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).
Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy.
HeLa cells stably expressing GFP were seeded in 35-mm imaging dishes (Ibidi), infected with a low dose of C. trachomatis L2, and overlaid with liquid overlay medium (see “Liquid overlay medium-based plaque assay” above for experimental details) at 2 h p.i. following incubation at 35°C. Fluorescence images were acquired every 15 min using an Eclipse TE2000-E widefield microscope (Nikon) with time-lapse imaging capability equipped with a Cascade 512B electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera (Photometrics).
Statistical analysis.
Data are presented as means ± standard errors of the means. Significant differences between means were determined using Student's t test. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS
LOM plaque assay shows distinct plaque morphology of different Chlamydia spp.
We first compared plaque formation in McCoy cells infected with C. trachomatis L2 at different MOIs under standard solid medium (Oxoid agar) and liquid overlay medium (LOM) by conventional crystal violet staining (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Slightly larger plaques with clearer plaque morphology were detected under LOM conditions than with standard solid overlay medium. Additionally, the LOM plaque assay allowed the specific detection of C. trachomatis plaques by anti-Chlamydia Hsp60 immunostaining (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Next, plaque formation of different Chlamydia spp. in HeLa 229 and McCoy cells under LOM plaque assay conditions was assessed (Fig. 1). All Chlamydia strains tested, including C. trachomatis L2, C. trachomatis A and D, C. psittaci, and C. muridarum, formed detectable plaques in an MOI-dependent manner in the two different cell lines after 4 days p.i. Interestingly, the morphology of C. muridarum plaques differed from the plaque morphology of C. trachomatis and C. psittaci. In C. muridarum infections, plaques were larger and showed a rim-like Hsp60 staining pattern indicative of cytotoxicity, known to be associated with C. muridarum (24). Moreover, clonal variations of Chlamydia infections can be assessed on a subcellular level (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). In sum, the LOM plaque assay is a fast, robust, and antigen-specific titration method for different Chlamydia spp. in various cell lines and allows the discrimination of Chlamydia spp. by plaque morphology.
FIG 1.
Novel plaque assay allows titration of Chlamydia species based on immunofluorescence staining. Immunofluorescence images show plaques of C. trachomatis L2 (Ctr L2), C. trachomatis A (Ctr A), C. trachomatis D (Ctr D), C. psittaci (Cps), and C. muridarum (Cmu) in a cell monolayer of HeLa 229 and McCoy cells. Cells were seeded in 48-well plates and infected with different titers. After 4 days of incubation, cells were fixed and stained for chlamydial Hsp60. Numbers indicate the dilution factor of the bacteria.
LOM plaque numbers of C. trachomatis were reduced after chloramphenicol treatment.
We tested if our established LOM plaque assay would allow the identification of anti-Chlamydia compounds by addition of chloramphenicol, an antibiotic that inhibits bacterial protein synthesis (Fig. 2A). Cells were infected with C. trachomatis L2, and at 8 h p.i., different concentrations of chloramphenicol were added to the cell layer together with the overlay medium. Plaques were visualized 4 days p.i. by immunofluorescence and counted using ImageJ. Clear and distinct C. trachomatis plaques were detected for concentrations below 1 μg/ml (1.09 μM) chloramphenicol. At 1 μg/ml chloramphenicol the formation of C. trachomatis plaques was completely blocked (Fig. 2A). Based on the data obtained, we determined the IC50 of chloramphenicol by plotting the concentrations of chloramphenicol against relative plaque numbers, yielding an IC50 of 2.77 μM (0.90 μg/ml) (Fig. 2B; Table 1). This demonstrates that anti-Chlamydia compounds can be identified by and IC50s can be calculated from LOM plaque assays.
FIG 2.
Inhibitory compounds can be screened and quantified for their anti-Chlamydia activity. (A) Immunofluorescence images showing C. trachomatis L2 (Ctr L2) plaques in a HeLa 229 cell monolayer after incubation with different concentrations of chloramphenicol. Cells were seeded in 48-well plates, infected with C. trachomatis L2 (MOI, 0.003; approximately 300 IFU per well), and, at 8 h p.i., incubated with chloramphenicol (CHL; concentrations are in μg/ml). After 4 days of incubation, cells were fixed and stained for chlamydial Hsp60. UT, untreated controls. (B) Quantification of relative plaque numbers. Plaque numbers were normalized to untreated controls (n = 2; error bars indicate standard errors [SE]).
TABLE 1.
IC50s of inhibitory compounds used in this studya
Compound | IC50 (μg/ml) |
IC50 (μM) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
Chloramphenicol | 0.90 | 0.46 | 2.77 | 1.43 |
D609 | 20.91 | 0.79 | 78.47 | 2.97 |
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 | 3.13 | 0.45 | 4.65 | 0.67 |
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 acts as a novel anti-Chlamydia compound.
Chlamydia spp. are auxotrophic for different nutrients, including sphingolipids (9, 25). Recent data showed an effect of the sphingomyelin synthase inhibitor D609 on uptake of fluorescently labeled ceramide by C. muridarum; however, the effect of the inhibitor on bacterial propagation was not addressed (17). D609 acts on different enzymes of the eukaryotic host cell, including SMS1, SMS2, and the phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C (PLC) (26). To test the effect of SMS inhibition by D609 on C. trachomatis propagation, a LOM plaque assay was performed in the presence of D609 at various concentrations. A clear reduction in plaque numbers was observed at a concentration of 25 μg/ml (93.82 μg/ml) D609, demonstrating that inhibition of D609-sensitive pathways efficiently impedes chlamydial propagation (Fig. 3A). To understand the impact of SM production on C. trachomatis propagation, we synthesized ceramide-C16 derivatives labeled with NBD, NBD-ceramide-C16, and 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 (Fig. 3B) and analyzed their impact on C. trachomatis propagation by LOM plaque assay (Fig. 3C). 1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 is a derivative of NBD-ceramide-C16 and resembles to a large extent a compound called 1-O-methyl-C6-NBD-ceramide. The latter was previously shown not to be converted to sphingomyelin and to be transported to the Golgi apparatus by lower kinetics than NBD-ceramide-C6 (27). 1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 treatment clearly reduced plaque numbers at 5 μM (3.37 μg/ml) compared to infected cells treated with the identical concentration of NBD-ceramide-C16 (Fig. 3C and D). We next compared the IC50 of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 with those of chloramphenicol and D609 (Table 1). The IC50 of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 (4.65 μM [3.13 μg/ml]) was in the range of that of chloramphenicol (IC50 of 2.77 μM [0.90 μg/ml]), and interestingly, 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 was 17 times more effective than D609 (IC50 of 78.47 μM [20.91 μg/ml]), showing that 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 is a very potent and novel anti-Chlamydia compound.
FIG 3.
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 inhibits plaque formation of C. trachomatis L2. (A) Immunofluorescence images showing C. trachomatis L2 (Ctr L2) plaques in a HeLa 229 cell monolayer after incubation with different concentrations of D609. Cells were seeded in 48-well plates, infected with C. trachomatis L2 (MOI 0.003; approximately 300 IFU per well), and, at 8 h p.i., incubated with D609 (μg/ml). After 4 days of incubation, cells were fixed and stained for chlamydial Hsp60. UT, untreated controls. (B) Chemical structures of NBD-ceramide-C16 and 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16. (C) Immunofluorescence images showing C. trachomatis L2 (Ctr L2) plaques in a HeLa 229 cell monolayer after incubation with different concentrations of anti-Chlamydia compounds. Cells were seeded in 48-well plates, infected with C. trachomatis L2 (MOI, 0.003; approximately 300 IFU per well), and, at 8 h p.i., incubated with NBD-ceramide-C16 and 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 (concentrations are in μM units). After 4 days of incubation, cells were fixed and stained for chlamydial Hsp60. (D) Quantification of relative plaque numbers. Plaque numbers were normalized to those of untreated controls (n = 2 for D609; n = 4 for ceramide compounds; error bars indicate SE).
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 reduces C. trachomatis EB formation but not cell viability.
We next assessed the effect of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 on the production of infectious C. trachomatis EBs during the cycle of development. Infected HeLa cells were treated with 4.65 μM (the IC50 of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16) NBD-labeled ceramides or left untreated. At various time points, cells were lysed, and EBs were titrated. A reduction in infectious EBs up to one order of magnitude was observed after treatment with a single dose of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 (Fig. 4A). The treatment did not affect the progression of the developmental cycle, as production of infectious EBs peaked at 2 days p.i. for treated as well as untreated conditions (Fig. 4A), indicating that the compound directly targets either bacterial growth or the production of infectious EBs. To further exclude effects on host cell viability, an LDH cytotoxicity assay of infected and uninfected cells after treatment with the different compounds was performed (Fig. 4B to E). In uninfected cells, no signs of cytotoxicity were observed after treatment (Fig. 4B and C). Upon infection, untreated cells showed a marginal increase in cytotoxicity that was due to the infection. Thus, treatment with the inhibitory compound even slightly decreased C. trachomatis-dependent cytotoxicity (Fig. 4D and E). In sum, our compound strongly reduces the formation of infectious C. trachomatis EBs at a concentration that does not affect host cell viability.
FIG 4.
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 reduces C. trachomatis progeny formation but has no impact on cell viability. (A) Graph showing chlamydial replication at the indicated time points after incubation without (untreated) or with ceramide compounds. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates and infected with C. trachomatis L2 (MOI 2), and, at 8 h p.i., ceramide compounds were added at a concentration of 4.65 μM (the IC50 of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16). Cells were harvested at the indicated time points, titrated on freshly seeded cells, fixed at 24 h p.i., and stained for Hsp60. Chlamydial replication is expressed as infection-forming units (IFU) per ml (n = 3; error bars indicate SE). (B to E) Relative cytotoxicity of compounds used in this study for uninfected (B and C) and infected (D and E) cells, as measured by LDH release. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates, infected with C. trachomatis L2 (Ctr L2; MOI, 2) or left uninfected, and, at 8 h p.i., incubated with different concentrations of chloramphenicol (CHL; concentrations are in μg/ml), D609 (concentrations are in μg/ml), NBD-ceramide-C16 (concentrations are in μM units), and 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 (concentrations are in μM units). After 2 days of incubation, LDH release was measured using a spectrophotometric microplate reader. Values are corrected for background and normalized to positive control (lysed cells) (n = 2 for CHL and D609; n = 3 for ceramide compounds; error bars indicate SE).
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 does not affect inclusion formation.
Our data suggest that 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 interferes either with bacterial growth or with the formation of infectious EBs. To differentiate between these two possibilities, we analyzed the size and appearance of C. trachomatis inclusions in untreated, control-treated, and 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16-treated HeLa cells by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5). At 24 h p.i. cells were fixed, stained for the bacterial antigens Hsp60 and IncA, and visualized with a laser scanning confocal microscope. No significant differences in inclusion formation, appearance, or size were detected after 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 treatment compared to controls at 24 h p.i. (Fig. 5), demonstrating that 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 does not affect inclusion formation and suggesting that bacterial growth is not affected.
FIG 5.
Inclusion formation is not affected by 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16. Immunofluorescence images show bacterial Hsp60 and IncA in C. trachomatis L2 (Ctr L2; MOI, 2) infected and noninfected (NI) HeLa 229 cells upon treatment with ceramide compounds. At 8 h p.i., ceramide compounds were added at a concentration of 4.65 μM (the IC50 of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16). Cells were fixed at 24 h p.i. and stained with antibodies against chlamydial Hsp60 (green) and IncA (red); DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 20 μm. Images are representative of three independent experiments.
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 is not taken up by C. trachomatis.
To further understand the mode of action of the new compound, we analyzed the cellular localization of NBD-ceramide-C16 and 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 in C. trachomatis-infected and uninfected HeLa cells by live-cell microscopy. After 60 min of incubation, NBD-ceramide-C16 was incorporated into the bacteria inside the inclusion (Fig. 6). In contrast, the inhibitory compound 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 did not accumulate inside C. trachomatis inclusions but rather showed cytoplasmic fluorescence and a slight staining of the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 6), demonstrating that only NBD-ceramide-C16 but not 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 was incorporated into the bacteria. This suggests that 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 operates outside the bacteria targeting either a host cell factor or a secreted bacterial protein and may indicate that sphingolipid transport across the inclusion membrane to the bacteria requires metabolism.
FIG 6.
1-O-Methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 is not translocated into the chlamydial inclusion. Fluorescence images show the localization of NBD-labeled ceramide compounds in C. trachomatis L2 (Ctr L2; MOI, 2)-infected and noninfected (NI) HeLa 229 cells. At 24 h p.i., ceramide compounds were added at a concentration of 25 μM. After incubation for 1 h at 35°C, DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342, and images were acquired using laser scanning confocal microscopy. Scale bar, 20 μm. Images are representative of three independent experiments.
DISCUSSION
We have established a fast and robust plaque assay for the identification of new anti-Chlamydia compounds based on a previously published plaque assay to assess viral replication (28). Using this liquid overlay medium (LOM)-based plaque assay, we found that a single dose of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 strongly reduces the number of infectious EBs. In contrast to NBD-ceramide-C16, 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 did not accumulate in the bacteria inside the inclusion, suggesting that this compound acts on factors outside the bacteria.
Plaque formation assays are useful tools for the titration of different microorganisms and allow the identification of new antimicrobial substances, as they cover all stages of an infection process by capturing multiple rounds of infections. For many microorganisms, a solid overlay medium is necessary to prevent movement and spread of the organisms. For Chlamydia, plaque assays have been developed that use an agarose-based overlay medium (19, 20, 29). Although agarose concentrations had already been reduced to 0.5%, keeping cells in a good state, even the fast-growing strains C. trachomatis D and L2 needed 13 days to form detectable plaques under these conditions (19). In contrast, the established LOM plaque procedure reduces the required time for detection of plaques from different Chlamydia spp., including the slow-growing trachoma biovar C. trachomatis A, to less than 5 days. Thus, the LOM plaque assay is nearly three times faster than the standard Chlamydia plaque assay. Compared to titration of infectious EBs by reinfection assays, the LOM plaque assay is less labor-intensive and can easily be adapted to a 96-well-plate format to screen for novel anti-Chlamydia compounds. Another advantage of the established assay is the use of Chlamydia-specific antibodies for detection of plaques. Immunodetection increases sensitivity and specificity of the described assay compared to a classical visualization of plaques by crystal violet staining. In addition, different Chlamydia species and the expression of different proteins can be distinguished based on plaque morphology and by using different protein-specific antibodies, respectively. Thus, the LOM plaque assay can visualize differences between clonal variants and phase variations at the subcellular level, which will help to further describe and understand Chlamydia diversity.
Chloramphenicol is often used in Chlamydia research to analyze the contribution of bacterial proteins to a specific process by blocking chlamydial protein synthesis. It affects the growth of the Chlamydia inclusion at concentrations higher than 0.4 μg/ml (30). These observations are in good agreement with our LOM plaque titration, which showed reduced plaque formation starting at concentrations higher than 0.1 μg/ml (1.09 μM) chloramphenicol, demonstrating the reliability and usability of our assay to identify anti-Chlamydia compounds.
The intricate interaction of Chlamydia with its host cell and its dependency on scavenging host sphingolipids constitute a possible Achilles' heel that can be exploited for the development of novel anti-Chlamydia compounds. To test this hypothesis, we treated C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells with D609, a known SMS inhibitor. D609 treatment dramatically reduced plaque formation, confirming the importance of sphingomyelin for C. trachomatis infection. D609 is a drug that targets cellular sphingolipid synthases but, in addition, has pleiotropic effects on the host cell, including Zn2+ chelation, increased metabolic activity, and decreased ROS formation (26). To limit these unwanted side effects, we hypothesized that a ceramide analogue that cannot be converted to sphingomyelin would inhibit bacterial propagation more efficiently and more specifically. Therefore, an analogue was synthesized by methylation of the 1-hydroxy group. One dose of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 (4.65 μM [3.13 μg/ml]) decreased the number of infectious EBs by more than one order of magnitude without any obvious effects on cell viability, as measured by LDH release, rendering this compound a potential new lead substance for the development of novel anti-Chlamydia drugs. Interestingly, Toxoplasma gondii and Salmonella enterica have also been shown to scavenge cellular sphingolipid pathways, and orthologs of the human SMS have been identified in the genome of Plasmodium falciparum (31–33). It will be interesting to analyze the inhibitory effect of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 on these additional medically important, intracellular human pathogens.
Although we currently do not understand how 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 operates on C. trachomatis, it is likely that a cellular protein, possibly CERT, is targeted by this compound. This view is supported by the analysis of trafficking of fluorescently labeled ceramide compounds using live-cell microcopy. Chlamydia spp. incorporate fluorescently labeled ceramides with short fatty acid chains, as documented by different groups (13–15, 17). These derivatives are commonly used in cell biology to analyze sphingolipid trafficking; however, naturally occurring ceramides have longer acyl chains which give rise to differences in their polarity and transport routes (27). We therefore used NBD-ceramide-C16 to analyze the trafficking of a ceramide with a native acyl chain length in C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells and showed that ceramides with natural fatty acids also accumulate inside the bacteria within the inclusion. Surprisingly, 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 was not transported to C. trachomatis but remained in the cytoplasm of the infected host cell outside the inclusion. This suggests that 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 binds to a protein with higher affinity than NBD-ceramide-C16. Alternatively, transport of sphingomyelin across the inclusion membrane is either dependent on the phosphocholine head group or directly coupled to SM synthesis. The latter view is supported by the observations of Elwell et al. (17) showing that human SMS2 is recruited to the C. muridarum inclusion membrane. Further studies are on the way to understand the mode of action of 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16.
Beside its anti-chlamydial activity, 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 might become a useful tool to understand sphingolipid metabolism and transport in infected cells. It is known that C6-NBD ceramide, labeled within its fatty acid part, is almost exclusively localized to the Golgi apparatus in uninfected cells (34). Schwarzmann et al. showed that the same holds true for the 3-O-methyl ether but not for the 1-O-methyl ether of C6-NBD-ceramide, which cannot be converted to sphingomyelin or glycosphingolipids, suggesting that metabolism of ceramide is required for Golgi staining (27). It is noteworthy that the 1-O-methyl ether of ceramide not only differs from the previously reported compound by fatty acid chain length but also is the NBD dye attached to the sphingosine part of ceramide and not to the fatty acid part. However, the special feature of this novel ceramide derivative is that it is not further converted to sphingomyelin or glycosphingolipids. The observation that this compound does not accumulate inside the inclusion suggests that only sphingomyelin is taken up by C. trachomatis, confirming previously published biochemical data for isolated EBs (35).
We have shown that our established LOM plaque assay is a useful technique to rapidly and robustly analyze effects of different compounds on Chlamydia propagation and have identified 1-O-methyl-NBD-ceramide-C16 as a novel anti-Chlamydia lead compound that can be used to better understand sphingolipid transport to and across the bacterial inclusion membrane.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are very grateful to Konrad Sachse (Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany) for providing us with C. psittaci strain DC15. We thank Anton Aebischer (Robert Koch Institute, Berlin) for critical comments on the manuscript and Thorsten Wolff (Robert Koch Institute, Berlin) for support in establishing the LOM plaque assay.
This work was financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP 1580 to Dagmar Heuer; HE6008/1-1) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the national research network “Zoonotic Chlamydia—Models of chronic and persistent infections in humans and animals.” Essa M. Saied is very grateful for a Yousef Jameel Scholarship.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 7 July 2014
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.03457-14.
REFERENCES
- 1.Balabanova Y, Gilsdorf A, Buda S, Burger R, Eckmanns T, Gärtner B, Gross U, Haas W, Hamouda O, Hübner J, Jänisch Kist TM, Kramer MH, Ledig T, Mielke M, Pulz M, Stark K, Suttorp N, Ulbrich U, Wichmann O, Krause G. 2011. Communicable diseases prioritized for surveillance and epidemiological research: results of a standardized prioritization procedure in Germany, 2011. PLoS One 6:e25691. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haggerty CL, Gottlieb SL, Taylor BD, Low N, Xu F, Ness RB. 2010. Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J. Infect. Dis. 201(Suppl):S134–S155. 10.1086/652395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sweet RL, Schachter J, Robbie MO. 1983. Failure of beta-lactam antibiotics to eradicate Chlamydia trachomatis in the endometrium despite apparent clinical cure of acute salpingitis. JAMA 250:2641–2645. 10.1001/jama.1983.03340190043029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Augenbraun M, Bachmann L, Wallace T, Dubouchet L, McCormack W, Hook EW. 1998. Compliance with doxycycline therapy in sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex. Transm. Dis. 25:1–4. 10.1097/00007435-199801000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dean D, Suchland RJ, Stamm WE. 2000. Evidence for long-term cervical persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis by omp1 genotyping. J. Infect. Dis. 182:909–916. 10.1086/315778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hogan RJ, Mathews SA, Mukhopadhyay S, Summersgill JT, Timms P. 2004. Chlamydial persistence: beyond the biphasic paradigm. Infect. Immun. 72:1843–1855. 10.1128/IAI.72.4.1843-1855.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhengraj AR, Vardhan H, Srivastava P, Salhan S, Mittal A. 2010. Decreased susceptibility to azithromycin and doxycycline in clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis obtained from recurrently infected female patients in India. Chemotherapy 56:371–377. 10.1159/000314998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bastidas RJ, Elwell CA, Engel JN, Valdivia RH. 2013. Chlamydial intracellular survival strategies. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 3:a010256. 10.1101/cshperspect.a010256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van Ooij C, Kalman L, Van Ijzendoorn S, Nishijima M, Hanada K, Mostov K, Engel JN. 2000. Host cell-derived sphingolipids are required for the intracellular growth of Chlamydia trachomatis. Cell. Microbiol. 2:627–637. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2000.00077.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ullman MD, Radin NS. 1974. The enzymatic formation of sphingomyelin from ceramide and lecithin in mouse liver. J. Biol. Chem. 249:1506–1512 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hanada K, Kumagai K, Yasuda S, Miura Y, Kawano M, Fukasawa M, Nishijima M. 2003. Molecular machinery for non-vesicular trafficking of ceramide. Nature 426:803–809. 10.1038/nature02188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hullin-Matsuda F, Taguchi T, Greimel P, Kobayashi T. 2014. Lipid compartmentalization in the endosome system. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 31C:48–56. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hackstadt T, Rockey DD, Heinzen RA, Scidmore MA. 1996. Chlamydia trachomatis interrupts an exocytic pathway to acquire endogenously synthesized sphingomyelin in transit from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane. EMBO J. 15:964–977 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Scidmore MA, Fischer ER, Hackstadt T. 2003. Restricted fusion of Chlamydia trachomatis vesicles with endocytic compartments during the initial stages of infection. Infect. Immun. 71:973–984. 10.1128/IAI.71.2.973-984.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heuer D, Rejman Lipinski A, Machuy N, Karlas A, Wehrens A, Siedler F, Brinkmann V, Meyer TF. 2009. Chlamydia causes fragmentation of the Golgi compartment to ensure reproduction. Nature 457:731–735. 10.1038/nature07578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rejman Lipinski A, Heymann J, Meissner C, Karlas A, Brinkmann V, Meyer TF, Heuer D. 2009. Rab6 and Rab11 regulate Chlamydia trachomatis development and golgin-84-dependent Golgi fragmentation. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000615. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Elwell CA, Jiang S, Kim JH, Lee A, Wittmann T, Hanada K, Melancon P, Engel JN. 2011. Chlamydia trachomatis co-opts gbf1 and cert to acquire host sphingomyelin for distinct roles during intracellular development. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002198. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Derre I, Swiss R, Agaisse H. 2011. The lipid transfer protein CERT interacts with the Chlamydia inclusion protein IncD and participates to ER-Chlamydia inclusion membrane contact sites. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002092. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matsumoto A, Izutsu H, Miyashita N, Ohuchi M. 1998. Plaque formation by and plaque cloning of Chlamydia trachomatis biovar trachoma. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3013–3019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gieffers J, Belland RJ, Whitmire W, Ouellette S, Crane D, Maass M, Byrne GI, Caldwell HD. 2002. Isolation of Chlamydia pneumoniae clonal variants by a focus-forming assay. Infect. Immun. 70:5827–5834. 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5827-5834.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9:676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bhabak KP, Hauser A, Redmer S, Banhart S, Heuer D, Arenz C. 2013. Development of a novel FRET probe for the real-time determination of ceramidase activity. ChemBioChem 14:1049–1052. 10.1002/cbic.201300207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Heuer D, Brinkmann V, Meyer TF, Szczepek AJ. 2003. Expression and translocation of chlamydial protease during acute and persistent infection of the epithelial HEp-2 cells with Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae. Cell. Microbiol. 5:315–322. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00278.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Belland RJ, Scidmore MA, Crane DD, Hogan DM, Whitmire W, McClarty G, Caldwell HD. 2001. Chlamydia trachomatis cytotoxicity associated with complete and partial cytotoxin genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:13984–13989. 10.1073/pnas.241377698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tipples G, McClarty G. 1993. The obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis is auxotrophic for three of the four ribonucleoside triphosphates. Mol. Microbiol. 8:1105–1114. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01655.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Adibhatla RM, Hatcher JF, Gusain A. 2012. Tricyclodecan-9-yl-xanthogenate (D609) mechanism of actions: a mini-review of literature. Neurochem. Res. 37:671–679. 10.1007/s11064-011-0659-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pütz U, Schwarzmann G. 1995. Golgi staining by two fluorescent ceramide analogues in cultured fibroblasts requires metabolism. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 68:113–121 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Matrosovich M, Matrosovich T, Garten W, Klenk H-D. 2006. New low-viscosity overlay medium for viral plaque assays. Virol. J. 3:63. 10.1186/1743-422X-3-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Banks J, Eddie B, Sung M, Sugg N, Schachter J, Meyer KF. 1970. Plaque reduction technique for demonstrating neutralizing antibodies for Chlamydia. Infect. Immun. 2:443–447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hobson D, Stefanidis D, Rees E, Tait IA. 1982. Effects of chloramphenicol on Chlamydia trachomatis infection in neonatal conjunctivitis and in McCoy cell cultures. J. Hyg. 89:457–466. 10.1017/S0022172400071023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Melo EJ, de Souza W. 1996. Pathway of C6-NBD-Ceramide on the host cell infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Cell Struct. Funct. 21:47–52. 10.1247/csf.21.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huitema K, van den Dikkenberg J, Brouwers JFHM, Holthuis JCM. 2004. Identification of a family of animal sphingomyelin synthases. EMBO J. 23:33–44. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kuhle V, Abrahams GL, Hensel M. 2006. Intracellular Salmonella enterica redirect exocytic transport processes in a Salmonella pathogenicity island 2-dependent manner. Traffic 7:716–730. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00422.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lipsky NG, Pagano RE. 1985. A vital stain for the Golgi apparatus. Science 228:745–747. 10.1126/science.2581316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hackstadt T, Scidmore MA, Rockey DD. 1995. Lipid metabolism in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells: directed trafficking of Golgi-derived sphingolipids to the chlamydial inclusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:4877–4881. 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.