Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Sep;58(9):5567–5569. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03408-14

Sterilizing Activity of Thioridazine in Combination with the First-Line Regimen against Acute Murine Tuberculosis

Noton K Dutta a, Michael L Pinn a, Petros C Karakousis a,b,
PMCID: PMC4135856  PMID: 24936590

Abstract

We recently reported that in lung tissue, thioridazine accumulates at high concentrations relative to serum levels, displaying modest synergy with isoniazid and reducing the emergence of isoniazid-resistant mutants in mouse lungs. In this study, we sought to investigate the sterilizing activity of human-equivalent doses of thioridazine when given in combination with the “Denver regimen” against acute murine tuberculosis. We found a trend toward a positive impact of thioridazine on the bacterial clearance and lowering relapse rates of the combined standard TB chemotherapy.

TEXT

Active tuberculosis (TB) in humans comprises a mixed population of rapidly multiplying bacilli and sporadically replicating or nonreplicating persisters, which require prolonged treatment to prevent clinical relapse, posing a major obstacle to global TB eradication. Strategies involving new drugs and shorter regimens, as well as new applications for existing FDA-approved drugs, are urgently needed to combat the TB epidemic. Efflux pumps, crucial for Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival and persistence under antimicrobial stress, are now known to contribute to intrinsic or acquired resistance (1). Therefore, efflux pump inhibitors, which are already in clinical practice for other medical indications, may be useful as novel chemotherapeutics against M. tuberculosis (2). The efflux pump inhibitor and antipsychotic drug thioridazine (TRZ), which is inexpensive, readily available, and relatively safe, has shown activity against drug-sensitive and drug-resistant strains in vitro (3, 4), ex vivo (5), and in vivo (6, 7), and in extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB patients when used in combination with antibiotics to which the strains were initially resistant (8). Although we found that TRZ is ineffective as monotherapy in the mouse model of TB, the drug exhibited modest synergy during coadministration with isoniazid (INH), reducing the emergence of INH-resistant mutants (9). As TRZ accumulates at high concentrations relative to serum levels in lung tissue (9), we hypothesized that treatment with TRZ in combination with the standard first-line anti-TB (Denver) regimen (1012) may accelerate the eradication of bacilli from the lungs of mice acutely infected with M. tuberculosis, reducing the time required to prevent microbiological relapse.

All animal-related procedures were approved by the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee. A total of 141 female BALB/c mice aged 4 to 6 weeks (Charles River Labs, Wilmington, MA) were aerosol infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv (JHU), using the inhalation exposure system (Glas-Col, Terre Haute, IN) calibrated to deliver ∼104 CFU per mouse lung in two consecutive runs. After aerosol infection, the mice were randomized into treatment groups, as outlined in Table 1. Two weeks postinfection, the mice were treated daily (5 days/week) orally with human-equivalent doses of INH (10 mg/kg), rifampin (RIF) (10 mg/kg), and pyrazinamide (PZA) (150 mg/kg) with or without TRZ (25 mg/kg) (9, 13) for up to 6 months. For the first 2 months of treatment, mice were given RIF, INH, and PZA, and for the remaining 4 months they were given only RIF and INH to mirror the Denver regimen. The RIF dose preceded that of the other drugs (INH-PZA/INH-PZA-TRZ) by at least 1 h to prevent pharmacokinetic antagonism (14, 15). Mice were scheduled for sacrifice on the day after infection, on the day of treatment initiation, and at the indicated time points after treatment to determine the numbers of CFU implanted in the lungs, pretreatment baseline lung CFU counts, and posttreatment lung CFU, respectively (Table 1). Treatment was discontinued for groups of 10 mice after completion of 4, 5, or 6 months of antibiotic treatment for the assessment of relapse. Relapse was defined as the presence of mycobacterial colonies upon plating of entire undiluted lung homogenates.

TABLE 1.

Bacillary burden in the lungs of acutely infected mice during treatment and relapse rates

Groupa Log10 CFU count (mean ±SD) atb:
Relapse rate (no. positive culture/total no. of mice [%]), assessed 3 mo after completion of treatment for:
D13 D0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M4 M5 M6
Untreated 4.37 ± 0.07 8.28 ± 0.14
RIF-INH-PZA 5.72 ± 0.16 3.73 ± 0.15 1.82 ± 0.26 0.37 ± 0.23 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 9/10 (90) 2/10 (20) 0/10 (0)
RIF-INH-PZA-TRZ 5.28 ± 0.19 3.41 ± 0.3 1.31 ± 0.12 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 6/10 (60) 0/10 (0) 0/10 (0)
Total no. of mice 6 5 20c 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20
a

Drug doses: 10 mg/kg isoniazid (INH), 10 mg/kg rifampin (RIF), 150 mg/kg pyrazinamide (PZA), and 25 mg/kg thioridazine (TRZ). For the two treated groups, PZA was given for the first 2 months.

b

D, day; M, month.

c

All 10 untreated mice died within 3 weeks.

Animal body weights and lung and spleen weights were recorded at the time of sacrifice. The lungs of sacrificed animals were examined grossly for visible lesions, and small, randomly selected sections were formalin fixed for histopathology. The remainder of each lung was homogenized in 2.5 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Lung homogenates were plated on selective 7H11 plates (BD, Baltimore, MD) for CFU enumeration.

CFU data were derived from five mice per group. Log-transformed CFU were used to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs). Comparisons of data among experimental groups were performed by t test. A difference was considered statistically significant at a P value of <0.05.

One day postinfection, the mean (±SD) lung CFU counts were log10 4.37 ± 0.06 and 4.37 ± 0.09 in aerosol runs 1 and 2, respectively. Thirteen days later, on the day (day 0) of treatment initiation the mean lung CFU count was 8.28 ± 0.14 log10. The untreated mice became moribund by 3 weeks postinfection and were euthanized in accordance with animal care regulations. No spontaneous mortality was recorded in the treated groups during the entire study period. In the initial phase, the standard regimen of RIF-INH-PZA reduced the lung CFU counts to 5.72 ± 0.16 and 3.73 ± 0.15 log 10 after 1 and 2 months of treatment, respectively, whereas TRZ in combination with RIF-INH-PZA showed very modest synergistic activity, reducing bacterial burden by an additional 0.439 log10 (P = 0.005) and 0.31 log10 (P = 0.07) relative to RIF-INH-PZA after combination treatment for 1 month and 2 months, respectively. During the continuation phase, the addition of TRZ to RIF-INH resulted in slightly greater killing activity at 3 months of treatment compared to RIF-INH (mean lung CFU counts, 5.28 ± 0.19 and 5.72 ± 0.16, respectively; P = 0.004). At 4 months after treatment initiation, all lungs of mice receiving the RIF-INH-TRZ regimen were culture negative, remaining so at month 5 and month 6. However, the lungs of mice receiving RIF-INH remained culture positive at month 4 (0.43 ± 0.13 log10), thereafter becoming culture negative at month 5 and month 6. In mice treated with the Denver regimen, relapse rates of 90%, 20% (2 CFU isolated in each mouse lung), and 0% were observed after completion of treatment for 4 months, 5 months, and 6 months, respectively, whereas mice treated with the Denver regimen plus TRZ showed relapse rates of 60%, 0%, and 0% after completion of treatment for 4 months, 5 months, and 6 months, respectively.

To our knowledge this is the first preclinical study to investigate the sterilizing activity of TRZ when used in combination with the standard first-line regimen against acute murine TB. TRZ given at human-equivalent doses was safe and well tolerated for the entire treatment period (9, 16). When TRZ was added to the Denver regimen, we observed a trend toward enhanced clearance of bacilli in the lungs of acutely infected mice relative to the control regimen alone. Our findings might be explained by the previously reported synergy of TRZ with the cell wall-active agent INH (9), enhancing the killing of actively multiplying bacilli, and with the transcriptional inhibitor RIF, accelerating the clearance of persisters (17). Dormant M. tuberculosis in an in vitro hollow fiber system (18) and in the Wayne model of progressive hypoxia (19) shows susceptibility to TRZ, which targets M. tuberculosis respiration (12). Furthermore, TRZ appears to induce the killing of intracellular bacilli by macrophages (20). The sterilizing activity of TRZ given in combination with multidrug-resistant (MDR) and XDR regimens deserves further study in preclinical animal models. In addition, the role of TRZ against latent TB infection should be investigated (13, 21).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01 HL106786 and R01 AI083125, respectively.

The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 16 June 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sarathy JP, Dartois V, Lee EJ. 2012. The role of transport mechanisms in mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance and tolerance. Pharmaceuticals 5:1210–1235. 10.3390/ph5111210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Almeida Da Silva PE, Palomino JC. 2011. Molecular basis and mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: classical and new drugs. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66:1417–1430. 10.1093/jac/dkr173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amaral L, Kristiansen JE, Abebe LS, Millett W. 1996. Inhibition of the respiration of multidrug resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by thioridazine: potential use for initial therapy of freshly diagnosed tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 38:1049–1053. 10.1093/jac/38.6.1049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van Ingen J, van der Laan T, Amaral L, Dekhuijzen R, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D. 2009. In vitro activity of thioridazine against mycobacteria. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 34:190–191. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ordway D, Viveiros M, Leandro C, Bettencourt R, Almeida J, Martins M, Kristiansen JE, Molnar J, Amaral L. 2003. Clinical concentrations of thioridazine kill intracellular multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:917–922. 10.1128/AAC.47.3.917-922.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martins M, Viveiros M, Kristiansen JE, Molnar J, Amaral L. 2007. The curative activity of thioridazine on mice infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In Vivo 21:771–775 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.van Soolingen D, Hernandez-Pando R, Orozco H, Aguilar D, Magis-Escurra C, Amaral L, van Ingen J, Boeree MJ. 2010. The antipsychotic thioridazine shows promising therapeutic activity in a mouse model of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. PLoS One 5:e12640. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abbate E, Vescovo M, Natiello M, Cufre M, Garcia A, Gonzalez Montaner P, Ambroggi M, Ritacco V, van Soolingen D. 2012. Successful alternative treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Argentina with a combination of linezolid, moxifloxacin and thioridazine. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67:473–477. 10.1093/jac/dkr500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dutta NK, Pinn ML, Karakousis PC. 2014. Reduced emergence of isoniazid resistance with concurrent use of thioridazine against acute murine tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58:4048–4053. 10.1128/AAC.02981-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dutta NK, Mehra S, Kaushal D. 2010. A Mycobacterium tuberculosis sigma factor network responds to cell-envelope damage by the promising antimycobacterial thioridazine. PLoS One 5:e10069. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dutta NK, Mazumdar K, Dastidar SG, Karakousis PC, Amaral L. 2011. New patentable use of an old neuroleptic compound thioridazine to combat tuberculosis: a gene regulation perspective. Recent Pat. Antiinfect. Drug Discov. 6:128–138. 10.2174/157489111796064597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Black PA, Warren RM, Louw GE, van Helden PD, Victor TC, Kana BD. 2014. Energy metabolism and drug efflux in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58:2491–2503. 10.1128/AAC.02293-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dutta NK, Illei PB, Jain SK, Karakousis PC. 9 May 2014. Characterization of a novel necrotic granuloma model of latent tuberculosis infection and reactivation in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grosset J, Truffot-Pernot C, Lacroix C, Ji B. 1992. Antagonism between isoniazid and the combination pyrazinamide-rifampin against tuberculosis infection in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:548–551. 10.1128/AAC.36.3.548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dhillon J, Dickinson JM, Sole K, Mitchison DA. 1996. Preventive chemotherapy of tuberculosis in Cornell model mice with combinations of rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:552–555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Udwadia ZF, Sen T, Pinto LM. 2011. Safety and efficacy of thioridazine as salvage therapy in Indian patients with XDR-TB. Recent Pat. Antiinfect. Drug Discov. 6:88–91. 10.2174/157489111796064614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Viveiros M, Amaral L. 2001. Enhancement of antibiotic activity against poly-drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by phenothiazines. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 17:225–228. 10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00343-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Musuka S, Srivastava S, Siyambalapitiyage Dona CW, Meek C, Leff R, Pasipanodya J, Gumbo T. 2013. Thioridazine pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters “wobble” during treatment of tuberculosis: a theoretical basis for shorter-duration curative monotherapy with congeners. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:5870–5877. 10.1128/AAC.00829-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sohaskey CD. 2008. Nitrate enhances the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during inhibition of respiration. J. Bacteriol. 190:2981–2986. 10.1128/JB.01857-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dutta NK, Pinn ML, Zhao M, Rudek MA, Karakousis PC. 2013. Thioridazine lacks bactericidal activity in an animal model of extracellular tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:1327–1330. 10.1093/jac/dkt037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sohaskey C. 2011. Latent tuberculosis: is there a role for thioridazine? Pat. Antiinfect. Drug Discov. 6:139–146. 10.2174/157489111796064551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES