Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Sep;58(9):5598–5601. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02435-13

Preliminary Study of Colistin versus Colistin plus Fosfomycin for Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections

Rujipas Sirijatuphat 1, Visanu Thamlikitkul 1,
PMCID: PMC4135862  PMID: 24982065

Abstract

Ninety-four patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii were randomized to receive colistin alone or colistin plus fosfomycin for 7 to 14 days. The patients who received combination therapy had a significantly more favorable microbiological response and a trend toward more favorable clinical outcomes and lower mortality than those who received colistin alone. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01297894.)

TEXT

Acinetobacter spp. are one of the most common causes of nosocomial pneumonia in Asian countries, including Thailand (1). The overall prevalence of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter spp. causing nosocomial pneumonia in Thai patients is 82%. The treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, led to the observation that the mortality of the patients who received colistin was 46%, compared with 80% of those who received other antibiotics (2). The observed mortality rate of patients who received colistin alone is still high, even though almost all isolates of CR A. baumannii are susceptible to colistin. One of the contributing factors to a modest response to colistin is that monotherapy with colistin may be insufficient. A systematic review on colistin in combination with other antibiotics revealed that colistin plus other antibiotics showed synergy in many isolates of A. baumannii, lowered mortality in animals in some studies, and showed no superiority to colistin monotherapy in several small studies in humans (3). Fosfomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that is active against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (4). Fosfomycin has been an alternative drug for the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections, especially when combined with other antibiotics, due to its synergistic effect (5, 6). Although the MICs of fosfomycin against clinical isolates of A. baumannii in Thailand were rather high (MIC50, 64; MIC90, 128 μg/ml), a combination of 1 μg/ml colistin and 64 μg/ml fosfomycin showed a synergistic effect against two clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (7).

The objective of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01297894) was to compare the 28-day all-cause mortality, clinical response, and microbiological response of a colistin plus fosfomycin combination with colistin alone for the treatment of CR A. baumannii infections.

This was a preliminary open-label randomized controlled study at Siriraj Hospital, which is a 2,300-bed tertiary care university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, performed from January 2010 to March 2011. The study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board, and informed consents were obtained from all participating patients. Eligible patients were hospitalized adults age ≥18 years who developed CR A. baumannii infection and required treatment with colistin. Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infection is defined as having clinical signs and symptoms of infection in the presence of CR A. baumannii isolated from the relevant clinical specimens. Each patient received colistin according to the decision of the attending physician. Eligible patients were randomized to receive a combination of intravenous colistin (colistimethate sodium) at a dosage of 5 mg of colistin base activity/kg of body weight/day plus intravenous fosfomycin sodium at a dosage of 4 g every 12 h (combination group) or colistin alone at the aforementioned dose (monotherapy group). The duration of treatment was 7 to 14 days, depending on the clinical response and site of infection, except for the patient who died before 7 days and the patient who needed a longer treatment duration, such as for a complicated intra-abdominal infection. Colistin and fosfomycin were given at the same time, and the dosages of both drugs were adjusted according to the renal function of the patients. Each patient was observed daily for clinical assessment until the colistin and fosfomycin therapy for CR A. baumannii infection was discontinued or the patient died or left the hospital. Microbiological culture of the specimens taken from the infection site was made on day 3 after starting study treatment and at the end of treatment with colistin and fosfomycin. Renal and liver function tests were performed at least once a week. The clinical outcomes were assessed at 72 h after starting the study treatment, at the end of study treatment, and 28 days after treatment with colistin and fosfomycin. The clinical outcome was classified as favorable outcome (cure or improvement of all attributable signs and symptoms) or nonfavorable outcome (persistence or progression of disease or death). Microbiological responses were classified as eradication (no target organisms found), persistence, or undetermined. Acute kidney injury was defined as at least the injury category (decreasing glomerular filtration rate, >50%, doubling of serum creatinine, or urine production of <0.5 ml/kg/h for 12 h) of the risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) classification (8).

It was estimated that the 28-day all-cause mortality of CR A. baumannii infection treated with colistin was 46% (2). Assuming the combination therapy reduced the 28-day mortality by 50%, from 46% to 23% compared with therapy with colistin alone, 46 patients per group were needed when 5% type I error and 20% type II error were accepted. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, unpaired Student's t test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Survival analysis was performed by the Breslow test. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study, and five patients were excluded from data analysis because the causative organism was not A. baumannii, the causative organism was a carbapenem-susceptible isolate, or the patient died within 24 h after enrollment. Therefore, there were 94 patients included in the data analyses, i.e., 47 patients in the monotherapy group and 47 patients in the combination group. The characteristics and the outcomes of the 94 study patients are summarized in Table 1. The characteristics of the patients in both groups were comparable. Most of the study patients were elderly, had chronic underlying diseases, received mechanical ventilators, and developed ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Favorable clinical outcomes, mortality at the end of study treatment, and mortality at 28 days were not significantly different. A survival analysis showed no significant difference in survival time between the patients who received combination therapy and monotherapy (P = 0.656). However, the microbiological eradication rates in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the monotherapy group, at 90.7% versus 58.1% at the first 72 h, and 100% versus 81.2%, respectively, at the end of study treatment. Renal impairment was observed in 53.4% and 59.6% of the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively. The patients tolerated the combination of colistin and fosfomycin therapy well. No neurotoxicity was observed related to the study treatments. The outcomes of the study when the patients who received concurrent carbapenem were excluded were similar to the overall treatment outcomes, as shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics and outcomes of 94 study patients

Patient characteristic with/without carbapenem treatment Colistin + fosfomycin Colistin P value
Characteristics of study patients
    n 47 47
    Female (%) 57.4 48.9 0.535
    Age (yr)
        Mean ± SD 67.4 ± 17.2 69.2 ± 16.3 0.603
        Median (min, max)a 69 (31, 96) 73 (30, 97)
    Diabetes mellitus (%) 44.7 23.4 0.050
    Cardiovascular disease (%) 17.0 21.3 0.793
    Cerebrovascular disease (%) 38.3 14.9 0.020
    Chronic kidney disease (%) 14.9 31.9 0.088
    Chronic lung disease (%) 21.3 17.0 0.793
    Malignancy (%) 36.2 25.5 0.372
    Postsurgery (%) 6.4 14.9 0.316
    Mechanical ventilator use (%) 83.0 74.5 0.450
    APACHE II score at diagnosis
        Mean ± SD 23.0 ± 6.4 21.9 ± 7.9 0.483
        Median (min, max) 24 (8, 35) 22 (5, 39)
    Length of hospital stay (days)
        Mean ± SD 46.0 ± 33.4 47.9 ± 53.0 0.429
        Median (min, max) 40 (5, 173) 28 (10, 326)
    Prior use of antibiotics within 2 wk (%) 100 95.7 0.495
    Type of infection (%)
        Pneumonia 78.7 74.5 0.808
        Primary bacteremia 4.3 6.4 1.000
        Urinary tract infection 6.4 4.3 1.000
        Skin and soft tissue infection 4.3 2.1 1.000
        Intra-abdominal or gastrointestinal infection 4.3 8.5 0.677
        Central nervous system infection 0 2.1 1.000
        Others 2.1 2.1 1.000
    Coinfection with (%):
        Klebsiella pneumoniae 4.3 12.8 0.267
        Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6.4 2.1 0.617
        MRSAb 4.3 4.3 1.000
        Other organismsc 2.1 2.1 1.000
    Concurrent antimicrobial agent (%)
        Carbapenem 8.5 17.0 0.354
        Piperacillin-tazobactam 2.1 2.1 1.000
        Vancomycin 2.1 4.3 1.000
        Other antibioticsd 4.3 6.4 1.000
    Dose of colistin (mean ± SD) (mg/kg) 4.4 ± 1.5 4.0 ± 1.5 0.586
    Duration of colistin (days)
        Mean ± SD 10.3 ± 3.9 12.1 ± 8.2 0.521
        Median (min, max) 12 (3, 15) 12 (3, 56)
    Duration of fosfomycin (days)
        Mean ± SD 10.0 ± 3.8
        Median (min, max) 12 (3, 14)
    Outcomes of the study patients
    Favorable clinical response (%)
        First 72 h 72.3 66.0 0.655
        End of study treatment 59.6 55.3 0.835
    28-day all-cause mortality (%) 46.8 57.4 0.409
    Infection-related 28-day mortality (%) 21.3 27.7 0.631
    Microbiological eradication (%)
        First 72 h 90.7 58.1 0.001
        End of study treatment 100 81.2 0.01
    Adverse events (%)
        Acute kidney injury (RIFLE) 53.4 59.6 0.679
        Abnormal liver function test 12.8 12.8 1.000
Outcomes of the study after excluding patients who received concurrent carbapenem
    n 43 39
    Favorable clinical response (%)
        First 72 h 76.7 66.7 0.336
        End of study treatment 62.8 56.4 0.654
    28-day all-cause mortality (%) 44.2 53.8 0.507
    Infection-related 28-day mortality (%) 16.3 23.1 0.578
    Microbiological eradication (%)
        First 72 h 87.8 65.7 0.028
        End of study treatment 100 84.5 0.023
    Adverse events (%)
        Acute kidney injury (RIFLE)e 37.2 48.7 0.372
        Abnormal liver function test 11.6 15.4 0.749
a

min, minimum; max, maximum.

b

MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

c

Other organisms, Candida spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

d

Other antibiotics, levofloxacin, metronidazole, and amphotericin B.

e

RIFLE is a classification representing risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and end-stage kidney disease.

The average dose ± standard deviation of colistin given to all subjects was 4.2 ± 1.5 mg/kg/day, and the average doses of colistin given to the patients in both groups were not significantly different from those shown in Table 1. Such a dose might achieve an average concentration of colistin in plasma around 2 μg/ml at steady state (9). Although the MIC90s of almost all CR A. baumannii isolates are <2 μg/ml, many patients might have much lower colistin concentration in their plasma. Moreover, most of the study patients had VAP, and the concentration of colistin in the lung tissue should be lower than that in plasma, as Imberti et al. (10) reported that the concentrations of colistin in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were undetectable after the intravenous administration of colistin (10). Four grams of parenteral fosfomycin every 12 h might achieve a peak concentration in plasma of >260 μg/ml, which is much higher than the MIC90s of almost all CR A. baumannii isolates (11). Fosfomycin penetrates the fluid of the interstitial space of soft tissues and reaches levels sufficient to inhibit the growth of bacteria at the target site (12). The aforementioned information might contribute to observing significantly more microbiological responses in the combination group than in the monotherapy group. However, a reduction in the mortality of patients in the combination group was not detected. Only a trend of greater clinical response (absolute difference, 12.3% at the first 72 h and 4.3% at the end of treatment) and a trend of lower mortality (absolute difference, 10.6% for overall 28-day mortality and 6.4% for infection-related 28-day mortality) in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group were observed. Several reasons might explain nonsignificant differences in the clinical outcomes. Most of the study patients had severe infection due to VAP, with a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at diagnosis of infection of 22 to 23. APACHE II score has been shown to be an independent predictor of mortality due to VAP, and patients with an APACHE II score of >16 had 54% mortality even though they received appropriate antibiotics (13). Intravenous fosfomycin given at 12-h intervals might not be sufficiently frequent to achieve maximum bactericidal effect, since its serum half-life is only 2 h (11). The sample size of the subjects in this study was not large enough to detect a 10% difference in mortality, and approximately 3,000 patients would be needed in order to detect such a small yet significant difference in mortality. Since this study was unable to identify any subgroup of patients with CR A. baumannii infections who might gain clinical benefit from receiving combination therapy, the addition of fosfomycin to colistin for therapy of against CR A. baumannii infection is not generally recommended at this time. A multicenter study of many more patients is required to determine if the combination of fosfomycin and colistin is more beneficial than colistin alone in lowering the mortality rate of patients infected with CR A. baumannii.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the faculty of medicine at Siriraj Hospital, Infectious Disease Association of Thailand, and Health Systems Research Institute (Thailand) for supporting the study. We also thank Pornpan Koomanachai for study coordination and Sasima Tongsai for data analyses.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 30 June 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chung DR, Song JH, Kim SH, Thamlikitkul V, Huang SG, Wang H, So TM, Yasin RM, Hsueh PR, Carlos CC, Hsu LY, Buntaran L, Lalitha MK, Kim MJ, Choi JY, Kim SI, Ko KS, Kang CI, Peck KR, Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens Study Group 2011. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant non-fermenters in hospital-acquired pneumonia in Asia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 184:1409–1417. 10.1164/rccm.201102-0349OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Koomanachai P, Tiengrim S, Kiratisin P, Thamlikitkul V. 2007. Efficacy and safety of colistin (colistimethate sodium) for therapy of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 11:402–406. 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Petrosillo N, Ioannidou E, Falagas ME. 2008. Colistin monotherapy vs. combination therapy: evidence from microbiological, animal and clinical studies. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:816–827. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02061.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shrestha NK, Tomford JW. 2001. Fosfomycin: a review. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 10:255–260. 10.1097/00019048-200106000-00004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Falagas ME, Kastoris AC, Karageorgopoulos DE, Rafailidis PI. 2009. Fosfomycin for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli: a systematic review of microbiological, animal and clinical studies. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 34:111–120. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Falagas ME, Giannopoulou KP, Kokolakis GN, Rafailidis PI. 2008. Fosfomycin: use beyond urinary tract and gastrointestinal infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1069–1077. 10.1086/527442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tharavichitkul P, Sanguanlikitkul C, Boonchoo M, Bousoung V, Khantawa B. 2005. In vitro synergistic effects of a combination of fosfomycin and colistin against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii. Abstracts of the 31st annual meeting of the Infectious Disease Association of Thailand, Chonburi, Thailand, 15 to 18 October 2005 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. 2004. Acute renal failure–definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit. Care. 8:R204–R212. 10.1186/cc2872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Garonzik SM, Li J, Thamlikitkul V, Paterson DL, Shoham S, Jacob J, Silveira FP, Forrest A, Nation RL. 2011. Population pharmacokinetics of colistin methanesulfonate and formed colistin in critically ill patients from a multicenter study provide dosing suggestions for various categories of patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:3284–3294. 10.1128/AAC.01733-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Imberti R, Cusato M, Villani P, Carnevale L, Iotti GA, Langer M, Regazzi M. 2010. Steady-state pharmacokinetics and bronchoalveolar lavage concentration of colistin in critically ill patients after IV colistin methanesulfonate administration. Chest 138:1333–1339. 10.1378/chest.10-0463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goto M, Sugiyama M, Nakajima S, Yamashina H. 1981. Fosfomycin kinetics after intravenous and oral administration to human volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20:393–397. 10.1128/AAC.20.3.393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frossard M, Joukhadar C, Erovic BM, Dittrich P, Mrass PE, Van Houte M, Burgmann H, Georgopoulos A, Müller M. 2000. Distribution and antimicrobial activity of fosfomycin in the interstitial fluid of human soft tissues. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2728–2732. 10.1128/AAC.44.10.2728-2732.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gursel G, Aydogdu M, Ozyilmaz E, Ozis TN. 2008. Risk factors for treatment failure in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy. J. Crit. Care. 23:34–40. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES