Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Aug;58(8):4928–4930. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02394-14

Association between pncA Gene Mutations, Pyrazinamidase Activity, and Pyrazinamide Susceptibility Testing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Akio Aono a,, Kinuyo Chikamatsu a, Hiroyuki Yamada a, Tomoko Kato a,b, Satoshi Mitarai a,b
PMCID: PMC4136016  PMID: 24867972

Abstract

We determined MICs for, confirmed the presence of pncA mutations in, and performed pyrazinamidase testing on colonies (subclones) obtained from seven isolates that exhibited differential pyrazinamide (PZA) susceptibility. Six of the seven strains were found to exhibit characteristics resulting from the mixture of strains possessing different properties. In addition, our analysis revealed large pncA-spanning deletions (1,565 bp, 4,475 bp, and 6,258 bp) in three strains that showed high PZA resistance.

TEXT

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important drug used in the treatment of tuberculosis (1). The conversion of PZA to pyrazinoic acid (POA) by pyrazinamidase (PZase) is necessary for its activity. Bacterial resistance to PZA has been shown to correlate with mutations in the pncA gene that encodes PZase (2, 3, 4).

The antimicrobial activity of PZA is considerably affected by the pH of its environment (5). The Bactec MGIT 960 system (Becton, Dickinson, Sparks, MD) was used to measure PZA drug susceptibility (6, 7) in bacteria grown in liquid medium that was adjusted to pH 5.9 (8). However, the MGIT system has generated inconsistent test outcomes when assessing PZase activity and the presence of pncA mutations (9, 10, 11).

In this study, we evaluated PZA drug susceptibility in 83 multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains (recently isolated in Japan) by using MGIT and PZase testing, and we confirmed the presence of pncA mutations in these strains. The strains were examined for their susceptibility to 100 μg/ml of PZA by using an MGIT PZA antimicrobial susceptibility testing assay, as previously described (8). For the strains that demonstrated resistance to 100 μg/ml PZA, the PZA MIC was determined using the EpiCenter system (Becton, Dickinson) by dissolving PZA powder to 200, 300, 400, 800, and 1,600 μg/ml in MGIT culture medium. PZase analysis was conducted using Wayne's method (12).

Using PCR, pncA was amplified from each strain and then directly sequenced according to the methods described by Sreevatsan et al. (13). The 673-bp region spanning pncA and an 82-bp upstream sequence amplified using pncA primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) were purified using MagExtractor (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The PCR products were then directly sequenced using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and an ABI 3137 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The pncA sequences were compared to the H37Rv strain genome (ATCC 27294) by using Genetyx Win v5.2 (Genetyx Co., Japan). In cases where PCR failed to yield a pncA amplicon, the strains were probed for amplification products upstream and downstream of pncA to investigate the cause of the negative results. PCR products were directly sequenced using the primer sets that were used for amplification.

The strains that differed with respect to pncA mutation or PZase activity at an MIC of ≥200 μg/ml and that were resistant to PZA were subcultured, and 10 subclones were randomly selected for each strain. Each subclone was again subjected to MIC and PZase testing and pncA mutation confirmation. The subclones were compared using a 15-locus variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis, as described by Supply et al. (14).

Three of the 83 strains were excluded from the study because of contamination. Of the remaining 80 strains, 31 (38.8%) showed susceptibility in the MGIT PZA assay, carried no pncA mutations, and tested positive for PZase, whereas 49 strains (61.2%) showed a PZA MIC of ≥200 μg/ml. Of these 49 strains, 39 (79.6%) carried a pncA mutation and were PZase negative (Fig. 1; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material). Colonies from 7 of the 49 strains (14.3%) which differed with respect to pncA mutation or PZase activity and exhibited a PZA MIC of ≥200 μg/ml were subcultured. Each subclone was again subjected to MIC and PZase testing and to pncA mutation confirmation (Table 1). Strain 4 displayed characteristics from two different subclones: (i) had a PZA MIC of ≤100 μg/ml, carried no pncA mutation, and was PZase positive, and (ii) had a PZA MIC of 1,600 μg/ml, carried a pncA mutation, and was PZase negative. Strains 13, 17, 50, and 79 displayed the following subclone characteristics: (i) had a PZA MIC of ≤100 μg/ml, and (ii) had a PZA MIC of ≥200 μg/ml, carried no pncA mutation, and were PZase positive. Strain 25 exhibited characteristics of three subclones: (i) had a PZA MIC of ≤100 μg/ml, carried no pncA mutation, and was PZase positive, (ii) had a PZA MIC of 400 μg/ml, carried no pncA mutation, and was PZase positive, and (iii) had a PZA MIC of ≥1,600 μg/ml, carried no pncA mutation, and was PZase negative. Strain 6 had an MIC of ≤100 μg/ml, showed no pncA mutation, and was PZase positive. No strain exhibiting an MIC of ≥200 μg/ml was isolated. VNTR analysis was conducted to compare the subclones from the six strains that exhibited mixed-strain characteristics. We found that the copy numbers were identical in each strain for each locus except for strain 17, which had a difference on QUB11b.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Flow diagram of PZA susceptibility analysis, pncA mutation testing, PZase analysis, and PZA MIC determinations (see also Fig. S1 and Table S2 in the supplemental material).

TABLE 1.

Results of retesting isolated strains with divergent results from PZA MIC measurements using the Bactec MGIT 960 system, pncA gene sequencing, PZase analysis, and VNTR analysis

Original strain no. Results for original strain
Isolated strain no. Results for isolated strain
MGIT PZA MIC (μg/ml) pncA mutation PZase analysis MGIT PZA MIC (μg/ml) pncA mutation PZase analysis VNTRa
4 >1,600 G insertion at 392 Positive i ≤100 None Positive Consistent in all loci
ii >1,600 G insertion at 392 Negative
6 400 None Positive i <100 None Positive
13 >1600 None Positive i ≤100 None Positive Consistent in all loci
ii >1,600 None Positive
17 400 None Positive i ≤100 None Positive QUB11b:7b
ii 400 None Positive QUB11b:6b
iii 800 None Positive QUB11b:7b
25 800 None Positive i ≤100 None Positive Consistent in all loci
ii 400 None Positive
iii >1,600 T→G at 456, V139G Negative
50 200 None Positive i ≤100 None Positive Consistent in all loci
ii 400 None Positive
79 200 None Positive i ≤100 None Positive Consistent in all loci
ii 400 None Positive
a

Compared to results for the isolated strain among the Supply et al. (14) 15-locus VNTR.

b

Recognized a difference in the copy number at QUB11b.

These results indicated that six of the seven strains exhibited overall phenotypic characteristics resulting from the mixture of strains that possessed different properties. Strains 4 and 25 showed a mixture of positive and negative PZase test results, suggesting that these strains might have been deemed positive despite the presence of a PZase-negative strain (15). Strain 25 appeared to be a mixture of a pncA mutant and a wild-type strain, and the initial analysis was reflective of a wild-type strain. Shi et al. (16) identified the ribosomal protein S1, encoded by the rpsA mutation, as an alternative target of POA that might be associated with PZA resistance in the absence of mutations in pncA. Moreover, Sheen et al. (17) reported that the POA efflux rate is associated with PZA resistance. Thus, the six PZA-resistant strains without pncA mutations in this study might carry rpsA mutations or might have altered POA efflux.

Three strains failed to yield pncA PCR amplicons. Strains 33, 47, and 61 produced PCR products at Rv2040 and Rv2047, Rv2041 and Rv2045, and Rv2031 and Rv2046, respectively. Each of these strains carried a complete deletion of pncA, which, to the best of our knowledge, is a novel finding. In addition, all three strains had MICs of >1,600 μg/ml. Strains 33, 47, and 61 contained a 4,475-bp deletion from Rv2041 to Rv2046, a 1,565-bp deletion from Rv2042 to Rv2044, and a 6,258-bp deletion from Rv2037 to Rv2045, respectively (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). These results suggest that the entire pncA was deleted in M. tuberculosis, demonstrating that strains lacking pncA can still be PZA resistant.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported by a health science research grant from the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Labor (H23-Shinko-Ippan-001).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 27 May 2014

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02394-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.British Medical Research Council. 1986. Controlled clinical trial of 4 short-course regimens of chemotherapy (three 6-month and one 8-month) for pulmonary tuberculosis: final report. East and Central African/British Medical Research Council Fifth Collaborative Study. Tubercle 67:5–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heifets L, Lindholm-Levy P. 1992. Pyrazinamide sterilizing activity in vitro against semidormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacterial populations. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145:1223–1225. 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scorpio A, Zhang Y. 1996. Mutations in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nat. Med. 2:662–667. 10.1038/nm0696-662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang Y, Permar S, Sun Z. 2002. Conditions that may affect the results of susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. J. Med. Microbiol. 51:42–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McDermott W, Tompsett R. 1954. Activation of pyrazinamide and nicotinamide in acidic environments in vitro. Am. Rev. Tuberc. 70:748–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aono A, Hirano K, Hamasaki S, Abe C. 2002. Evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA medium for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide (PZA): compared with the results of pyrazinamidase assay and Kyokuto PZA test. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 44:347–352. 10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00471-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sekiguchi J, Tomohiko N, Tohru MA, Fumiko K, Intetsu K, Ewa AK, Zofia Z, Koji M, Toshinori S, Hiroshi Y, Seiya K, Toru M, Teruo K. 2007. Development and evaluation of a line probe assay for rapid identification of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2802–2807. 10.1128/JCM.00352-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardiae, and other aerobic actinomycetes; approved standard, 2nd ed. Document M24-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Louw GE, Warren RM, Donald PR, Murray MB, Bosman M, Van Helden PD, Young DB, Victor TC. 2006. Frequency and implications of pyrazinamide resistance in managing previously treated tuberculosis patients. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 10:802–807 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marttila HJ, Marjamaki M, Vyshnevskaya E, Vyshnevskiy BI, Otten TF, Vasilyef AV, Viljanen MK. 1999. pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from northwestern Russia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1764–1766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Werngren J, Sturegård E, Juréen P, Ängeby K, Hoffner S, Schön T. 2012. Reevaluation of the critical concentration for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against pyrazinamide using wild-type MIC distributions and pncA gene sequencing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:1253–1257. 10.1128/AAC.05894-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wayne LG. 1974. Simple pyrazinamidase and urease tests for routine identification of mycobacteria. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 109:147–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sreevatsan S, Pan X, Zhang Y, Kreiswirth BN, Musser JM. 1997. Mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance in pncA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:636–640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S, Bifani P, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth B, Sola C, Rastogi N, Vatin V, Gutierrez MC, Fauville M, Niemann S, Skuce R, Kremer K, Locht C, Soolingen D. 2006. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4498–4510. 10.1128/JCM.01392-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McClatchy JK, Tsang AY, Cernich MS. 1981. Use of pyrazinamidase activity on Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a rapid method for determination of pyrazinamide susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20:556–557. 10.1128/AAC.20.4.556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shi W, Zhang X, Jiang X, Yuan H, Lee JS, Barry CE, III, Wang H, Zhang W, Zhang Y. 2011. Pyrazinamide inhibits trans-translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 333:1630–1632. 10.1126/science.1208813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sheen P, Lozano K, Gilman RH, Valencia HJ, Loli S, Fuentes P, Grandjean L, Zimic M. 2013. pncA gene expression and prediction factors on pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 93:515–522. 10.1016/j.tube.2013.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES