Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics logoLink to Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
. 2014 Jul-Aug;48(4):432–434. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.136313

Bifurcated intraarticular long head of biceps tendon

Vivek Pandey 1,, Simon Nurettin van Laarhoven 1, Gaurav Arora 1, Sripathi Rao 1
PMCID: PMC4137526  PMID: 25143652

Abstract

Though rare, many anomalous origins of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) have been reported in the literature. Anatomic variations commonly explained are a third humeral head, anomalous insertion, congenital absence and adherence to the rotator cuff. We report a rare case who underwent shoulder arthroscopy with impingement symptoms where in LHBT was found to be bifurcated with a part attached to superior labrum and the other part to the posterior capsule of joint. Furthermore, intraarticular portion of LHBT was adherent to the undersurface of the supraspinatus tendon. Awareness of such an anatomical aberration during the shoulder arthroscopy is of great importance as it can potentially avoid unnecessary confusion and surgery.

Keywords: Anatomic variation, arthroscopy, bifurcated, long head biceps brachii, shoulder joint

MeSH terms: Arthroscopy, shoulder joint, shoulder impingement syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) has frequently displayed congenital or developmental variation in cadaveric dissection where it is reported to be absent, with a third humeral head, of capsular origin and greater variations in labral attachment.1,2,3 The true incidence of LHBT variations reported 1.91%.4 It is the first structure to be visualized from the posterior portal during shoulder arthroscopy acting as an initial reference point; therefore, any congenital or developmental anomaly affecting LHBT can change the orientation of the surgeon while performing the arthroscopy. We report a case of bifurcated intraarticular LHBT confluent with under surface of supraspinatus tendon.

CASE REPORT

A 36 year old male, right handed and driver by occupation, presented with pain in the right shoulder for a period of 2 months. Pain was insidious gradually progressive and aggravated with overhead activities. There was no history of trauma or dislocation. Clinical examination revealed mild tenderness on greater tuberosity and positive Neer's impingement and Hawkins sign.5 Speed's test was negative with no tenderness over biceps tendon. Jobe's supraspinatus test5 and Belly press sign5 were negative. There was a full range of movement with a painful course in terminal flexion and abduction. Plain radiograph revealed Bigliani type III hooked acromion.6 Ultrasonography of right shoulder showed supraspinatus tendinopathy with dynamic impingement of supraspinatus tendon and thickened subacromial-subdeltoid bursa. Patient was treated conservatively by an local orthopedic surgeon for the last 2 months. Hence, we decided to perform arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Preoperative Constant Murley score was 72.7

After routine preoperative workup, patient was taken up for shoulder arthroscopy in lateral position under general anesthesia. Initially, diagnostic air arthroscopy was performed from the standard posterior portal. The biceps tendon was found to be bifurcated. One part was attached to superior labrum and the other slip merged with the posterosuperior capsule [Figure 1]. The LHBT tendon was found to be confluent with the undersurface of the supraspinatus tendon [Figure 2]. The biceps tendon was probed through standard anteroinferior portal and found to be adherent to the proximal part of the undersurface of supraspinatus tendon. However the LHBT was free distally and with abduction, gliding smoothly within the bicipital groove. Biceps tendon surface revealed minimally increased vascular pattern. Initially, we were unaware of the fact that the LHBT can be adhered to the undersurface of the supraspinatus tendon as an anomaly. Therefore, a small rent was made between the LHBT and undersurface to supraspinatus to probe and see mobility of the LHBT. Nevertheless, it was completely adherent to the undersurface of the supraspinatus tendon proximally and was freely gliding in the bicipital groove when it was pulled intraarticularly with the probe. Beside these variations, LHBT including labrum were normal except minimal synovitis; thus it was decided not to perform procedure such as tenodesis or tenotomy of the biceps tendon. Remainder of the glenohumeral arthroscopy was unremarkable. Bursoscopy showed subacromial bursitis and type 3 acromion. Subacromial bursectomy and acromioplasty were performed by standard techniques. Postoperatively, patient was prescribed a sling for 2 weeks, NSAIDs and ice pack to his shoulder. He underwent standard rehabilitation for subacromial decompression. 6 months postoperative, the patient completely recovered from his symptoms with Constant Murley score of 93.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Arthroscopic view showing bifurcated long head of the biceps tendon. With one part (black arrow) attached to the superior labrum and the other merged from the posterosuperior capsule (asterisk)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Arthroscopic view showing the long head of the biceps tendon confluent with the undersurface of the supraspinatus tendon (asterisk). Distal intraarticular part of the biceps tendon was free (black arrow)

DISCUSSION

LHBT develops from the mesoderm of arm bud between 7 and 8 weeks.2,8 Theories about further development of tendon have been controversial questioning whether it migrates into the joint from extraarticular position or through the capsule. A study by DePalma9 described that LHBT develops outside the joint and gradually migrates into the joint. A thin cord like structure later matures into flat tendon by 23-40 weeks and by adulthood; it is a triangular structure originating from supraglenoid tubercle contributing to the glenoid labrum. Neale10 challenged this concept as he found the biceps tendon deep into the capsule in many of the specimens. He proposed capsular development of LHBT. Testut11 also affirmed the theory of Neale and explained that LHBT can be related to the capsule in three ways; free, attached to or fused with the mesentery. Several studies have been published on the origin of LHBT and its anatomic variations.2,4,12 DePalma et al.13 described a variant of a double tendon with separate attachments to the supraglenoid tubercle and posterosuperior capsulolabral tissue. Furthermore, in a cadaveric study, Vangsness et al.12 showed 40-60% of LHBT originated from supraglenoid tubercle, with the remaining originating at superior glenoid labrum. Fibres originating from the labrum displayed four types of variations regarding the attachment. Dierickx et al.4 in their study have reported 57 cases with developmental anomalies of the LHBT in 2976 cases of shoulder arthroscopy from a Belgian and Italian population over 10 years. He classified the LHBT anomalies under four categories; absence of LHBT (ABS), partial or complete fusion with the capsule (ADH), a mesotenon (MESO) and a split variant (SPL). He did not mention any case with a combined anomaly. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only case reported with split LHBT in combination with adherence to undersurface of the supraspinatus. Moreover, Dierickx et al. proposed that adherent varieties of biceps can lead to lateral traction over contracting supraspinatus and superimpose a tear. However, he did not explain whether it can cause impingement or not. We hypothesize that the lateral traction of biceps can bunch up contracting supraspinatus tendon as it is adherent to biceps; and in a tight subacromial space with type III acromion it can cause impingement. If type III acromion is acquired with age, this proposed mechanism can well explain his symptoms in adulthood. However if his acromion was curved since childhood, why this variation lead to impingement in adulthood needs further investigations.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None

REFERENCES

  • 1.Greig HW, Anson BJ, Budinger JM. Variations in the form and attachments of the biceps brachii muscle. Q Bull Northwest Univ Med Sch. 1952;26:241–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ghalayini SR, Board TN, Srinivasan MS. Anatomic variations in the long head of biceps: Contribution to shoulder dysfunction. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1012–8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.El-Naggar MM, Zahir FI. Two bellies of the coracobrachialis muscle associated with a third head of the biceps brachii muscle. Clin Anat. 2001;14:379–82. doi: 10.1002/ca.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dierickx C, Ceccarelli E, Conti M, Vanlommel J, Castagna A. Variations of the intra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon: A classification of embryologically explained variations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:556–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hegedus EJ, Goode AP, Cook CE, Michener L, Myer CA, Myer DM, et al. Which physical examination tests provide clinicians with the most value when examining the shoulder? Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:964–78. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10:823–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:157–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aboul-Mahasen LM, Sadek SA. Developmental morphological and histological studies on structures of the human fetal shoulder joint. Cells Tissues Organs. 2002;170:1–20. doi: 10.1159/000047916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.DePalma AF. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1983. Surgery of the Shoulder. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Neale RM. The alleged transmigration of the long tendon of the biceps brachii. Anat Rec. 1937;67:205. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Testut L. Paris: Octave Doin; 1896. Traité d’Anatomie Humaine. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vangsness CT, Jr, Jorgenson SS, Watson T, Johnson DL. The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoid labrum. An anatomical study of 100 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:951–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.DePalma AF, Callery G, Bennett GA. Shoulder joint: Variational anatomy and degenerative lesions of the shoulder joint. Instr Course Lect. 1949;6:255–381. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Indian Orthopaedic Association

RESOURCES