Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1993 Dec 15;12(13):5007–5018. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06194.x

Identification of the C-terminal activator domain in yeast heat shock factor: independent control of transient and sustained transcriptional activity.

Y Chen 1, N A Barlev 1, O Westergaard 1, B K Jakobsen 1
PMCID: PMC413761  PMID: 8262043

Abstract

In yeast, heat shock factor (HSF) is a trimer that binds DNA constitutively but only supports high levels of transcription upon heat shock. The C-terminal regions of HSF from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis are unconserved yet both contain strong transactivators which are correctly regulated when substituted for each other. We have performed high resolution mapping of these activator domains which shows that in K.lactis HSF (KlHSF) activity can be located to a confined short domain, while in S.cerevisiae HSF (ScHSF) two separate regions are required for full activity. Alignment of the activator domains reveals similarity, as both overlap potential leucine zipper motifs (zipper C) with a distribution of hydrophobic residues similar to two highly conserved N-terminal domains which mediate HSF trimerization (zippers A and B). In higher eukaryotes a C-terminal leucine zipper is required to maintain HSF in a monomeric and non DNA-binding state under normal conditions and we therefore address the regulatory roles of the three leucine zipper motifs in KlHSF. Whilst the longest and most N-terminal of the trimer region zippers, A, is dispensable for regulation, mutation of a single leucine in zipper B makes HSF constitutively active. In contrast to the situation in higher eukaryotes disruption of zipper C has no observable regulatory effect and therefore, although an intramolecular contact between zippers B and C cannot be ruled out, such contact is not required for restraining the C-terminal activator domain. We furthermore find that deletions which abolish activator potential of the C-terminus render the host strain temperature sensitive. However, deletion of a double proline-glycine motif in the activator, whilst leaving HSF unable to respond to heat shock, does not cause temperature sensitivity. This result demonstrates that independent mechanisms control the transient and sustained activities of HSF.

Full text

PDF
5007

Images in this article

5009Image
on p.5009
5011Image
on p.5011
5012Image
on p.5012
5013Image
on p.5013
5015Image
on p.5015

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bienz M., Pelham H. R. Expression of a Drosophila heat-shock protein in Xenopus oocytes: conserved and divergent regulatory signals. EMBO J. 1982;1(12):1583–1588. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01359.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bienz M., Pelham H. R. Mechanisms of heat-shock gene activation in higher eukaryotes. Adv Genet. 1987;24:31–72. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60006-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonner J. J., Heyward S., Fackenthal D. L. Temperature-dependent regulation of a heterologous transcriptional activation domain fused to yeast heat shock transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1021–1030. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):211–222. doi: 10.1021/bi00699a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clos J., Westwood J. T., Becker P. B., Wilson S., Lambert K., Wu C. Molecular cloning and expression of a hexameric Drosophila heat shock factor subject to negative regulation. Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):1085–1097. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90511-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Courey A. J., Tjian R. Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals multiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):887–898. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90144-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989 Jul 20;340(6230):245–246. doi: 10.1038/340245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foulkes N. S., Mellström B., Benusiglio E., Sassone-Corsi P. Developmental switch of CREM function during spermatogenesis: from antagonist to activator. Nature. 1992 Jan 2;355(6355):80–84. doi: 10.1038/355080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giniger E., Ptashne M. Transcription in yeast activated by a putative amphipathic alpha helix linked to a DNA binding unit. Nature. 1987 Dec 17;330(6149):670–672. doi: 10.1038/330670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hope I. A., Mahadevan S., Struhl K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):635–640. doi: 10.1038/333635a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jakobsen B. K., Pelham H. R. A conserved heptapeptide restrains the activity of the yeast heat shock transcription factor. EMBO J. 1991 Feb;10(2):369–375. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07958.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jakobsen B. K., Pelham H. R. Constitutive binding of yeast heat shock factor to DNA in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;8(11):5040–5042. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.11.5040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kingston R. E., Schuetz T. J., Larin Z. Heat-inducible human factor that binds to a human hsp70 promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Apr;7(4):1530–1534. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.4.1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Landschulz W. H., Johnson P. F., McKnight S. L. The leucine zipper: a hypothetical structure common to a new class of DNA binding proteins. Science. 1988 Jun 24;240(4860):1759–1764. doi: 10.1126/science.3289117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Larson J. S., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Activation in vitro of sequence-specific DNA binding by a human regulatory factor. Nature. 1988 Sep 22;335(6188):372–375. doi: 10.1038/335372a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leone G., Maybaum L., Lee P. W. The reovirus cell attachment protein possesses two independently active trimerization domains: basis of dominant negative effects. Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):479–488. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90516-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leuther K. K., Salmeron J. M., Johnston S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a beta sheet. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):575–585. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lindquist S. The heat-shock response. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:1151–1191. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mermod N., O'Neill E. A., Kelly T. J., Tjian R. The proline-rich transcriptional activator of CTF/NF-I is distinct from the replication and DNA binding domain. Cell. 1989 Aug 25;58(4):741–753. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90108-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakai A., Morimoto R. I. Characterization of a novel chicken heat shock transcription factor, heat shock factor 3, suggests a new regulatory pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):1983–1997. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nicosia A., Monaci P., Tomei L., De Francesco R., Nuzzo M., Stunnenberg H., Cortese R. A myosin-like dimerization helix and an extra-large homeodomain are essential elements of the tripartite DNA binding structure of LFB1. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1225–1236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90687-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nieto-Sotelo J., Wiederrecht G., Okuda A., Parker C. S. The yeast heat shock transcription factor contains a transcriptional activation domain whose activity is repressed under nonshock conditions. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):807–817. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90124-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pascal E., Tjian R. Different activation domains of Sp1 govern formation of multimers and mediate transcriptional synergism. Genes Dev. 1991 Sep;5(9):1646–1656. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pelham H. R. A regulatory upstream promoter element in the Drosophila hsp 70 heat-shock gene. Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):517–528. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90249-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pelham H. R., Bienz M. A synthetic heat-shock promoter element confers heat-inducibility on the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. EMBO J. 1982;1(11):1473–1477. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01340.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pelham H. R. Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins. Cell. 1986 Sep 26;46(7):959–961. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90693-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Perisic O., Xiao H., Lis J. T. Stable binding of Drosophila heat shock factor to head-to-head and tail-to-tail repeats of a conserved 5 bp recognition unit. Cell. 1989 Dec 1;59(5):797–806. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90603-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pu W. T., Struhl K. The leucine zipper symmetrically positions the adjacent basic regions for specific DNA binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):6901–6905. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.6901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rabindran S. K., Giorgi G., Clos J., Wu C. Molecular cloning and expression of a human heat shock factor, HSF1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):6906–6910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.6906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rabindran S. K., Haroun R. I., Clos J., Wisniewski J., Wu C. Regulation of heat shock factor trimer formation: role of a conserved leucine zipper. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):230–234. doi: 10.1126/science.8421783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruden D. M., Ma J., Li Y., Wood K., Ptashne M. Generating yeast transcriptional activators containing no yeast protein sequences. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):250–252. doi: 10.1038/350250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sarge K. D., Murphy S. P., Morimoto R. I. Activation of heat shock gene transcription by heat shock factor 1 involves oligomerization, acquisition of DNA-binding activity, and nuclear localization and can occur in the absence of stress. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;13(3):1392–1407. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sarge K. D., Zimarino V., Holm K., Wu C., Morimoto R. I. Cloning and characterization of two mouse heat shock factors with distinct inducible and constitutive DNA-binding ability. Genes Dev. 1991 Oct;5(10):1902–1911. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.10.1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Scharf K. D., Rose S., Zott W., Schöffl F., Nover L., Schöff F. Three tomato genes code for heat stress transcription factors with a region of remarkable homology to the DNA-binding domain of the yeast HSF. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4495–4501. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07900.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schindler U., Terzaghi W., Beckmann H., Kadesch T., Cashmore A. R. DNA binding site preferences and transcriptional activation properties of the Arabidopsis transcription factor GBF1. EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1275–1289. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05171.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sorger P. K. Heat shock factor and the heat shock response. Cell. 1991 May 3;65(3):363–366. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90452-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sorger P. K., Lewis M. J., Pelham H. R. Heat shock factor is regulated differently in yeast and HeLa cells. Nature. 1987 Sep 3;329(6134):81–84. doi: 10.1038/329081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sorger P. K., Nelson H. C. Trimerization of a yeast transcriptional activator via a coiled-coil motif. Cell. 1989 Dec 1;59(5):807–813. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90604-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sorger P. K., Pelham H. R. Yeast heat shock factor is an essential DNA-binding protein that exhibits temperature-dependent phosphorylation. Cell. 1988 Sep 9;54(6):855–864. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)91219-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sorger P. K. Yeast heat shock factor contains separable transient and sustained response transcriptional activators. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):793–805. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90123-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tzamarias D., Pu W. T., Struhl K. Mutations in the bZIP domain of yeast GCN4 that alter DNA-binding specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 15;89(6):2007–2011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.6.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Hoy M., Leuther K. K., Kodadek T., Johnston S. A. The acidic activation domains of the GCN4 and GAL4 proteins are not alpha helical but form beta sheets. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):587–594. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90077-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wiederrecht G., Seto D., Parker C. S. Isolation of the gene encoding the S. cerevisiae heat shock transcription factor. Cell. 1988 Sep 9;54(6):841–853. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)91197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu C. An exonuclease protection assay reveals heat-shock element and TATA box DNA-binding proteins in crude nuclear extracts. Nature. 1985 Sep 5;317(6032):84–87. doi: 10.1038/317084a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Xiao H., Lis J. T. Germline transformation used to define key features of heat-shock response elements. Science. 1988 Mar 4;239(4844):1139–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.3125608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xiao H., Lis J. T. Heat shock and developmental regulation of the Drosophila melanogaster hsp83 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;9(4):1746–1753. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.4.1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xiao H., Perisic O., Lis J. T. Cooperative binding of Drosophila heat shock factor to arrays of a conserved 5 bp unit. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):585–593. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90242-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zimarino V., Tsai C., Wu C. Complex modes of heat shock factor activation. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Feb;10(2):752–759. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.2.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zimarino V., Wu C. Induction of sequence-specific binding of Drosophila heat shock activator protein without protein synthesis. 1987 Jun 25-Jul 1Nature. 327(6124):727–730. doi: 10.1038/327727a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES