Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1993 Dec;12(12):4585–4591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06147.x

Macroevolution by transposition: drastic modification of DNA recognition by a type I restriction enzyme following Tn5 transposition.

J Meister 1, M MacWilliams 1, P Hübner 1, H Jütte 1, E Skrzypek 1, A Piekarowicz 1, T A Bickle 1
PMCID: PMC413889  PMID: 8223468

Abstract

We have characterized a novel mutant of EcoDXXI, a type IC DNA restriction and modification (R-M) system, in which the specificity has been altered due to a Tn5 insertion into the middle of hsdS, the gene which encodes the polypeptide that confers DNA sequence specificity to both the restriction and the modification reactions. Like other type I enzymes, the wild type EcoDXXI recognizes a sequence composed of two asymmetrical half sites separated by a spacer region: TCA(N7)RTTC. Purification of the EcoDXXI mutant methylase and subsequent in vitro DNA methylation assays identified the mutant recognition sequence as an interrupted palindrome, TCA(N8)TGA, in which the 5' half site of the wild type site is repeated in inverse orientation. The additional base pair in the non-specific spacer of the mutant recognition sequence maintains the proper spacing between the two methylatable adenine groups. Sequencing of both the wild type and mutant EcoDXXI hsdS genes showed that the Tn5 insertion occurred at nucleotide 673 of the 1221 bp gene. This effectively deletes the entire carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domain which recognizes the 3' half of the EcoDXXI binding site. The truncated hsdS gene still encodes both the amino-terminal DNA binding domain and the conserved repeated sequence that defines the length of the recognition site spacer region. We propose that the EcoDXXI mutant methylase utilizes two truncated hsdS subunits to recognize its binding site. The implications of this finding in terms of subunit interactions and the malleability of the type I R-M systems will be discussed.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

4588Image
on p.4588
4588Image
on p.4588

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Argos P. Evidence for a repeating domain in type I restriction enzymes. EMBO J. 1985 May;4(5):1351–1355. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03784.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickle T. A., Krüger D. H. Biology of DNA restriction. Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jun;57(2):434–450. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.434-450.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyer H. W., Roulland-Dussoix D. A complementation analysis of the restriction and modification of DNA in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1969 May 14;41(3):459–472. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90288-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chamberlain J. P. Fluorographic detection of radioactivity in polyacrylamide gels with the water-soluble fluor, sodium salicylate. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):132–135. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90716-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cowan G. M., Gann A. A., Murray N. E. Conservation of complex DNA recognition domains between families of restriction enzymes. Cell. 1989 Jan 13;56(1):103–109. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90988-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Endlich B., Linn S. The DNA restriction endonuclease of Escherichia coli B. I. Studies of the DNA translocation and the ATPase activities. J Biol Chem. 1985 May 10;260(9):5720–5728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuller-Pace F. V., Bullas L. R., Delius H., Murray N. E. Genetic recombination can generate altered restriction specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(19):6095–6099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fuller-Pace F. V., Murray N. E. Two DNA recognition domains of the specificity polypeptides of a family of type I restriction enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(24):9368–9372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gubler M., Bickle T. A. Increased protein flexibility leads to promiscuous protein--DNA interactions in type IC restriction-modification systems. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):951–957. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08029.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gubler M., Braguglia D., Meyer J., Piekarowicz A., Bickle T. A. Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):233–240. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05046.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JACOB F., WOLLMAN E. L. Etude génétique d'un bactériophage tempéré d'Escherichia coli. l. Le système genétique du bactériophage. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1954 Dec;87(6):653–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Landry D., Barsomian J. M., Feehery G. R., Wilson G. G. Characterization of type II DNA-methyltransferases. Methods Enzymol. 1992;216:244–259. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)16025-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagaraja V., Shepherd J. C., Bickle T. A. A hybrid recognition sequence in a recombinant restriction enzyme and the evolution of DNA sequence specificity. Nature. 1985 Jul 25;316(6026):371–372. doi: 10.1038/316371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Price C., Lingner J., Bickle T. A., Firman K., Glover S. W. Basis for changes in DNA recognition by the EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 type I DNA restriction and modification enzymes. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jan 5;205(1):115–125. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Price C., Shepherd J. C., Bickle T. A. DNA recognition by a new family of type I restriction enzymes: a unique relationship between two different DNA specificities. EMBO J. 1987 May;6(5):1493–1497. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02391.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rosamond J., Endlich B., Linn S. Electron microscopic studies of the mechanism of action of the restriction endonuclease of Escherichia coli B. J Mol Biol. 1979 Apr 25;129(4):619–635. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90472-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sanger F., Coulson A. R., Friedmann T., Air G. M., Barrell B. G., Brown N. L., Fiddes J. C., Hutchison C. A., 3rd, Slocombe P. M., Smith M. The nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage phiX174. J Mol Biol. 1978 Oct 25;125(2):225–246. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90346-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sharp P. M., Kelleher J. E., Daniel A. S., Cowan G. M., Murray N. E. Roles of selection and recombination in the evolution of type I restriction-modification systems in enterobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 15;89(20):9836–9840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Skrzypek E., Piekarowicz A. The EcoDXX1 restriction and modification system: cloning the genes and homology to type I restriction and modification systems. Plasmid. 1989 May;21(3):195–204. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(89)90043-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Studier F. W., Bandyopadhyay P. K. Model for how type I restriction enzymes select cleavage sites in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(13):4677–4681. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Suri B., Shepherd J. C., Bickle T. A. The EcoA restriction and modification system of Escherichia coli 15T-: enzyme structure and DNA recognition sequence. EMBO J. 1984 Mar;3(3):575–579. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01850.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor I., Patel J., Firman K., Kneale G. Purification and biochemical characterisation of the EcoR124 type I modification methylase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jan 25;20(2):179–186. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vieira J., Messing J. Production of single-stranded plasmid DNA. Methods Enzymol. 1987;153:3–11. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)53044-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson G. G., Murray N. E. Restriction and modification systems. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:585–627. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wood W. B. Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli: bacterial mutations affecting the restriction and modification of DNA. J Mol Biol. 1966 Mar;16(1):118–133. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80267-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yuan R., Hamilton D. L., Burckhardt J. DNA translocation by the restriction enzyme from E. coli K. Cell. 1980 May;20(1):237–244. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90251-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES