Skip to main content
Interventional Neurology logoLink to Interventional Neurology
. 2013 Mar 20;1(3-4):124–131. doi: 10.1159/000346767

MR and Targeted Molecular MRI of Vulnerable Plaques

Jiping Yang a,*, Haiqing Yang a, Liqing Cao a, Shujun Li b
PMCID: PMC4138966  PMID: 25187773

Abstract

Plaque rupture or erosion represents a major cause of stroke and the acute coronary syndrome. Information on plaque morphology and composition is essential to identify patients at increased risk for acute cardio- and cerebrovascular events, and may play a key role in individualizing therapeutic strategies and monitoring the effect of interventions. The rapidly emerging field of MR and targeted molecular MRI allows to qualitatively and quantitatively characterize plaque features. We aimed to review the literature regarding the current most promising advanced techniques to image vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques.

Key Words
: Atherosclerotic plaques, Molecular imaging, MRI, Targeted contrast agent, Vulnerable plaques 


Introduction

Plaque rupture or erosion represents a major cause of stroke and the acute coronary syndrome. Information on plaque morphology and composition is essential to identify patients at increased risk for acute cardio- and cerebrovascular events, and may play a key role in individualizing therapeutic strategies and monitoring the effect of interventions. MRI has emerged as the most promising noninvasive imaging technique to estimate the degree of luminal narrowing and to identify plaque components in vivo [1,2,3,4]. Recent studies have shown a high sensitivity of MRI in the quantitative characterization of plaque morphology and the classification of the plaque type [1,5]. Contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI using gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid has improved the discrimination of the plaque components [6,7,8]. Furthermore, dynamic CE-MRI has shown that uptake of this agent is correlated with neovascularization and inflammation, both of which are critical indicators of early plaque development and plaque instability [9,10]. Recent advances in molecular imaging have led to the development of novel paramagnetic and superparamagnetic targeted MR contrast agents that bind exclusively to molecules such as albumin, fibrin, activated platelets, endothelial cells or angiogenesis markers [11,12,13,14]. We aimed to review the literature regarding the current most promising advanced MR and targeted molecular MRI techniques in vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques

MRI Techniques

Evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques using MRI includes black blood (BB) and bright blood time-of-flight (TOF) imaging (fig. 1). BB-MRI is commonly performed using fast or turbo spin echo sequences with double inversion recovery preparatory pulses, and yields excellent contrast between the dark lumen and the vessel wall [15]. Using BB-MRI, the combination of the signal intensities in the T1- and T2-weighted images is very helpful for investigators to discriminate lipid deposits, intraplaque hemorrhage, fibrous plaques and calcifications [16]. Bright blood TOF imaging assesses the extent of lumen stenosis and aids in the visualization of the fibrous cap (FC) in the absence of significant flow artifacts [17]. Multiple centers have developed multicontrast-weighted imaging sequences to obtain up to 0.6-mm in-plane resolution [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. These sequences include bright-blood TOF, and pre- and post-Gd contrast-enhanced BB imaging. These studies have shown that MRI can reliably identify FC status [17,25,26], plaque composition [17,27,28], neovasculature and inflammation [9,10].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

MR images of atherosclerotic plaques. a 3D-TOF MR angiogram demonstrates lumen stenosis (arrow). b T2-weighted image. c BB T1-weighted image without fat suppression. d BB T1-weighted image acquired with fat suppression yields excellent contrast among the vessel wall, dark lumen and surrounding tissues (arrow) compared with the image acquired without fat suppression (c).

MRI of Plaques

Many studies have investigated the detection of plaque components using MRI. Hatsukami et al. [17] found a high level of agreement between their MR findings and the histological state of the FC by comparing in vivo MRI to histology. The sensitivity and specificity in identifying a thin or ruptured FC was 81 and 90%, respectively [25]. The lipid core was identified with a mean sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 79% [1,27,29], whereas calcifications were identified with a mean sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 88% [27,28]. The sensitivity and specificity in identifying the intraplaque hemorrhage was 88 and 80%, respectively [27,28,29]. In addition, using multiple contrast weightings (T1- and T2-weighted images) improves the detection of soft plaque components with a mean sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 93% [30]. The Gd-based contrast material can help to differentiate necrotic or lipid-rich components from fibrous components [7,8]. Dynamic CE-MRI of atherosclerotic plaques has been used to determine the size of the lipid-necrotic core, vascular volume and permeability that strongly associate with plaque inflammation [9,10]. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agents produce a strong magnetic susceptibility effect on T2*-weighted images [31]. It has been reported that USPIO uptake may be a good marker of the extent of plaque inflammation [31,32]. Using USPIO particles has allowed the direct visualization of macrophages infiltrating carotid atheroma [33].

MRI of Vulnerable Plaques

It is important to accurately differentiate a stable plaque from an unstable one. Several studies suggest that the key factor determining plaque vulnerability is the plaque composition rather than the degree of luminal stenosis [26,34,35,36,37]. The most possible plaque-related risk factors are the condition of the FC, the size of the necrotic core and hemorrhage, and the extent of inflammatory activity within the plaque [18,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].

Lipids have a high signal intensity on proton density-weighted images and a low signal intensity on T2-weighted images, whereas the fibrous tissues show iso- and slightly high signal intensity on both the proton density and T2-weighted images, which results in significant contrast between lipid cores and fibrous tissues on T2-weighted images [2,27,30,35,44,46,47,48,49,50]. Morphologic measurements of the carotid vessel wall with MRI correlate closely with histology [26,29]. The visualization of FC status with MRI has also shown good agreement with histology [17], and unstable FCs (ulcerated, fissured, disrupted or cap thickness <0.25 mm) were detected with a high sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 90% [25]. Puppini et al. [29] reported that ulceration alone was detected with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. Intraplaque hemorrhage often occurs within lipid cores, and brings the high signal intensity into the lipid cores on both the T1- and T2-weighted images [28,30,36,40]. Yim et al. [40] reported that a fresh or recent intraplaque hemorrhage could be observed as a high signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on the maximum intensity projection images of TOF MR angiography. CE T1-weighted images can differentiate lipid-rich necrotic cores from fibrous tissues, since only the latter show enhancement [40]. Enhancement on the CE T1-weighted images may indicate a fibrous tissue or increased intraplaque vascularity [40]. Increased intraplaque vascularity may indicate a higher degree of inflammation. MRI in conjunction with Gd-based contrast agents has been investigated to detect intraplaque vasa vasorum. A significantly stronger plaque enhancement was seen in plaques with vasa vasorum [51].

Molecular MRI of Vulnerable Plaques

Molecular MRI with targeted contrast agents contributes to a significant improvement in visualizing the characteristics of vulnerable plaques in smaller arteries. Nanoparticle platforms which harbor both (a) molecular probes with affinity for plaques or antibodies directed against plaque antigens, and (b) a reasonable payload of Gd as a T1 shortening agent [52,53,54,55,56,57] have been used in several experimental studies. Inflammation is an important feature of atherosclerosis, and macrophages play a key role in the atherosclerotic process. USPIO particles can be taken up by activated macrophages in vulnerable plaques and are visible on T2*-weighted sequences as low signal intensity areas [32]. von zur Muhlen et al. [57] reported the use of iron oxide microparticles conjugated to a single-chain antibody targeting activated platelets to image thrombi induced in mouse carotid arteries via MRI. Klink et al. [13] used an activated platelet-targeted MRI contrast agent, P975, which is composed of a peptide targeting αIIbβ3 (P977) attached to a Gd chelate (Gd-DOTA). P975 displayed excellent contrast properties, and high resolution and sensitivity in in vivo imaging of platelet-rich acute thrombi. Botnar et al. [53] demonstrated the feasibility of in vivo molecular MRI for the detection of acute and subacute thrombosis using a novel fibrin-targeted MRI contrast agent in an animal model of atherosclerosis and acute/subacute thrombosis. Rogers and Basu [58] showed that in vitro superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) compounds are nonspecifically taken up by macrophages. A number of in vivo MRI studies have shown that SPIO compounds localize macrophages and predicted the presence of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques [33,59].

Matrix metalloproteinase is predominantly excreted by macrophages. Gd immunomicelles targeted at matrix metalloproteinase are capable of increasing the MRI signal both in vitro and in vivo [14]. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1)-targeted Gd and SPIO compounds have been investigated in atherosclerotic apolipoprotein E knockout mice, and VCAM-1-expressing endothelial cells have been successfully identified in vivo [60]. An E-selectin-targeted SPIO compound has been shown to bind to human endothelial cells and consequently cause a clear T2 signal decrease on MRI, demonstrating the feasibility of E-selectin-targeted molecular imaging [61]. McAteer et al. [62] showed that P-selectin-targeted SPIO compounds bind to atherosclerotic endothelial cells in vitro. Further study demonstrated the added value of dual-targeted molecular imaging, using a SPIO compound targeted to both VCAM-1 and P-selectin in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. In the meantime, the dual-targeted compound showed a significantly improved endothelial binding capacity compared to separate VCAM-1- or P-selectin-targeted compounds [62]. In vivo MRI using an integrin avβ3-targeted Gd contrast agent showed a significant increase in the MRI signal in the atherosclerotic vessel wall. Expression of integrin avβ3, proliferation of angiogenic vessels and neointima formation were confirmed by histology [63].

Vulnerable Plaques and Intervention

There is much clinical interest in vulnerable carotid plaques because it is not only a major cause of stroke, but also the most important potentially preventable cause of stroke. Intervention treatment of carotid artery stenosis can reduce the risk of stroke [64]. MRI is well suited for preoperative carotid plaque imaging because it is noninvasive, enables visualization of the carotid vessel lumen and wall, and can quantify plaque components [65]. Therefore, identifying the vulnerable carotid plaques, which probably is clinically more important than the severity of stenosis, is fundamental to the selection of patients for vascular intervention. MR and targeted molecular MRI has demonstrated the ability to identify morphological features of plaque vulnerability and may provide the pathophysiological information of the plaque pertinent to patient selection for carotid artery stenting. In addition, knowledge of plaque morphology may dictate stent selection and the type of neuroprotection used.

Conclusion

The introduction of targeted molecular MRI may shed more light on the pathophysiological mechanisms of atherosclerosis, and provide a powerful tool to evaluate individualized therapeutic strategies and monitor the effects of therapeutic interventions. The ability of targeted molecular MRI to identify vulnerable plaques may change the management of patients with atherosclerosis.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Hebei Natural Science Foundation (grant No. C2010000557 to J.Y.) and the Hebei Key Program of Medical Research (grant No 20120066 to J.Y.).

References

  • 1.Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, Small R, Davies JW, Kerwin WS, Hatsukami TS. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation. 2001;104:2051–2056. doi: 10.1161/hc4201.097839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:1368–1373. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028591.44554.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Helft G, Worthley SG, Fuster V, Fayad ZA, Zaman AG, Corti R, Fallon JT, Badimon JJ. Progression and regression of atherosclerotic lesions: monitoring with serial noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;105:993–998. doi: 10.1161/hc0802.104325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saam T, Cai J, Ma L, Cai YQ, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;240:464–472. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402050390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gao T, He X, Yu W, Zhang Z, Wang Y. Atherosclerotic plaque pathohistology and classification with high-resolution MRI. Neurol Res. 2011;33:325–330. doi: 10.1179/016164110X12767786356318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wasserman BA, Smith WI, Trout HH, 3rd, Cannon RO, 3rd, Balaban RS, Arai AE. Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MR imaging initial results. Radiology. 2002;223:566–573. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2232010659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yuan C, Kerwin WS, Ferguson MS, Polissar N, Zhang S, Cai J, Hatsukami TS. Contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI for atherosclerotic carotid artery tissue characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:62–67. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Maintz D, Ozgun M, Hoffmeier A, Fischbach R, Kim WY, Stuber M, Manning WJ, Heindel W, Botnar RM. Selective coronary artery plaque visualization and differentiation by contrast-enhanced inversion prepared MRI. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1732–1736. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kerwin W, Hooker A, Spilker M, Vicini P, Ferguson M, Hatsukami T, Yuan C. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of neovasculature volume in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation. 2003;107:851–856. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000048145.52309.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kerwin WS, O'Brien KD, Ferguson MS, Polissar N, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study. Radiology. 2006;241:459–468. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu X, Song SK, Chen J, Scott MJ, Fuhrhop RJ, Hall CS, Gaffney PJ, Wickline SA, Lanza GM. High-resolution MRI characterization of human thrombus using a novel fibrin-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticle contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:867–872. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<867::aid-mrm7>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flacke S, Fischer S, Scott MJ, Fuhrhop RJ, Allen JS, McLean M, Winter P, Sicard GA, Gaffney PJ, Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Novel MRI contrast agent for molecular imaging of fibrin: implications for detecting vulnerable plaques. Circulation. 2001;104:1280–1285. doi: 10.1161/hc3601.094303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Klink A, Lancelot E, Ballet S, Vucic E, Fabre JE, Gonzalez W, Medina C, Corot C, Mulder WJ, Mallat Z, Fayad ZA. Magnetic resonance molecular imaging of thrombosis in an arachidonic acid mouse model using an activated platelet targeted probe. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:403–410. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.198556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lancelot E, Amirbekian V, Brigger I, Raynaud JS, Ballet S, David C, Rousseaux O, Le Greneur S, Port M, Lijnen HR, Bruneval P, Michel JB, Ouimet T, Roques B, Amirbekian S, Hyafil F, Vucic E, Aguinaldo JG, Corot C, Fayad ZA. Evaluation of matrix metalloproteinases in atherosclerosis using a novel noninvasive imaging approach. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:425–432. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.149666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parker DL, Goodrich KC, Masiker M, Tsuruda JS, Katzman GL. Improved efficiency in double-inversion fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1017–1021. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yoshida K, Goto M, Funaki T, Oshimoto T, Wataya T, Narumi O, Chin M, Yamagata S. Noninvasive carotid plaque characterization by black blood MRI. No Shinkei Geka. 2005;33:235–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000;102:959–964. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.9.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fayad ZA, Fuster V. Clinical imaging of the high-risk or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Circ Res. 2001;89:305–316. doi: 10.1161/hh1601.095596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hayes CE, Mathis CM, Yuan C. Surface coil phased arrays for high-resolution imaging of the carotid arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;1:109–112. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880060121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chu B, Ferguson MS, Chen H, Hippe DS, Kerwin WS, Canton G, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS. Cardiac magnetic resonance features of the disruption-prone and the disrupted carotid plaque. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:883–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yuan C, Kerwin WS, Yarnykh VL, Cai J, Saam T, Chu B, Takaya N, Ferguson MS, Underhill H, Xu D, Liu F, Hatsukami TS. MRI of atherosclerosis in clinical trials. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:636–654. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saam T, Hatsukami TS, Takaya N, Chu B, Underhill H, Kerwin WS, Cai J, Ferguson MS, Yuan C. The vulnerable, or high-risk, atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MRI for characterization and assessment. Radiology. 2007;244:64–77. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2441051769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yuan C, Kerwin WS. MRI of atherosclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:710–719. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT, Jayasundera T, Worthley SG, Helft G, Aguinaldo JG, Badimon JJ, Sharma SK. Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000;102:506–510. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.5.506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mitsumori LM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Cai J, Yuan C. In vivo accuracy of multisequence MRI for identifying unstable fibrous caps in advanced human carotid plaques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:410–420. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cai J, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Saam T, Chu B, Takaya N, Polissar NL, Yuan C. In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid-rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Circulation. 2005;112:3437–3444. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.528174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, Takaya N, Xu D, Polissar NL, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:234–239. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000149867.61851.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Polissar NL, Chu B, Saam T, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Differentiation of intraplaque versus juxtaluminal hemorrhage/thrombus in advanced human carotid atherosclerotic lesions by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004;110:3239–3244. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147287.23741.9A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Puppini G, Furlan F, Cirota N, Veraldi G, Piubello Q, Montemezzi S, Gortenuti G. Characterisation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Radiol Med. 2006;111:921–930. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Watanabe Y, Nagayama M, Suga T, Yoshida K, Yamagata S, Okumura A, Amoh Y, Nakashita S, Van Cauteren M, Dodo Y. Characterization of atherosclerotic plaque of carotid arteries with histopathological correlation: vascular wall MR imaging vs. color Doppler ultrasonography (US) J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:478–485. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Watanabe Y, Nagayama M. MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery. Neuroradiology. 2010;52:253–274. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0663-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tang TY, Howarth SP, Miller SR, Graves MJ, U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Li ZY, Walsh SR, Brown AP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Gaunt ME, Gillard JH. Comparison of the inflammatory burden of truly asymptomatic carotid atheroma with atherosclerotic plaques contralateral to symptomatic carotid stenosis: an ultra small superparamagnetic iron oxide enhanced magnetic resonance study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1337–1343. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.118901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ruehm SG, Corot C, Vogt P, Kolb S, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 2001;103:415–422. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.3.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1262–1275. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.5.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cappendijk VC, Kessels AG, Heeneman S, Cleutjens KB, Schurink GW, Welten RJ, Mess WH, van Suylen RJ, Leiner T, Daemen MJ, van Engelshoven JM, Kooi ME. Comparison of lipid-rich necrotic core size in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaque: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:1356–1361. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, Virmani R, Yao JS. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:755–766. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70237-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Virmani R, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A. Pathology of thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque. J Interv Cardiol. 2003;16:267–272. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.8042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Delay GS, Allder S, MacSweeney ST, Tennant WG, Gladman J, Lowe J, Hunt BJ. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:3047–3052. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074222.61572.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kerwin WS, Zhao X, Chun Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Maravilla KR, Underhill HR, Zhao X. Contrast-enhanced MRI of carotid atherosclerosis: dependence on contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:35–40. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yim YJ, Choe YH, Ko Y, Kim ST, Kim KH, Jeon P, Byun HS, Kim DI. High signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on maximum intensity projection images of time-of-flight MR angiography: a new sign for intraplaque hemorrhage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:1341–1346. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, Davis JW, Ellington E, Ferguson MS, Hatsukami TS. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation. 2002;105:181–185. doi: 10.1161/hc0202.102121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Imparato AM, Riles TS, Mintzer R, Baumann FG. The importance of hemorrhage in the relationship between gross morphologic characteristics and cerebral symptoms in 376 carotid artery plaques. Ann Surg. 1983;197:195–203. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198302000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Murphy RE, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Delay GS, Allder S, MacSweeney ST, Tennant WG, Gladman J, Lowe J, Hunt BJ. Prevalence of complicated carotid atheroma as detected by magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:3053–3058. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074204.92443.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ouhlous M, Flach HZ, de Weert TT, Hendriks JM, van Sambeek MR, Dippel DW, Pattynama PM, van der Lugt A. Carotid plaque composition and cerebral infarction: MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1044–1049. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Van Damme H, Vivario M. Pathologic aspects of carotid plaques: surgical and clinical significance. Int Angiol. 1993;12:299–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Beach KW, Maravilla KR. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR characterization and identification of vulnerable lesions. Radiology. 2001;221:285–299. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2212001612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor H. T2-weighted contrast for NMR characterization of human atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1533–1542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Serfaty JM, Chaabane L, Tabib A, Chevallier JM, Briguet A, Douek PC. Atherosclerotic plaques: classification and characterization with T2-weighted high-spatial-resolution MR imaging – an in vitro study. Radiology. 2001;219:403–410. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma15403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ouhlous M, Hoek BA, van Sambeek MRHM, Dippel DW, Pattynama PMT, van der lugt A. Validation of in vivo MRI of the atherosclerotic plaque of the carotid artery with histologic sections: preliminary study. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(suppl 1):186. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.ten Kate GL, Sijbrands EJ, Valkema R, ten Cate FJ, Feinstein SB, van der Steen AF, Daemen MJ, Schinkel AF. Molecular imaging of inflammation and intraplaque vasa vasorum: a step forward to identification of vulnerable plaques? J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:897–912. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9263-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kawahara I, Morikawa M, Honda M, Kitagawa N, Tsutsumi K, Nagata I, Hayashi T, Koji T. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging using gadolinium-based contrast agent for atherosclerotic carotid plaque. Surg Neurol. 2007;68:60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Botnar RM, Perez AS, Witte S, Wiethoff AJ, Laredo J, Hamilton J, Quist W, Parsons EC, Jr, Vaidya A, Kolodziej A, Barrett JA, Graham PB, Weisskoff RM, Manning WJ, Johnstone MT. In vivo molecular imaging of acute and subacute thrombosis using a fibrin-binding magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Circulation. 2004;109:2023–2029. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127034.50006.C0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Botnar RM, Buecker A, Wiethoff AJ, Parsons EC, Jr, Katoh M, Katsimaglis G, Weisskoff RM, Lauffer RB, Graham PB, Gunther RW, Manning WJ, Spuentrup E. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of coronary thrombosis using a fibrin-binding molecular magnetic resonance contrast agent. Circulation. 2004;110:1463–1466. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134960.31304.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Winter PM, Morawski AM, Caruthers SD, Fuhrhop RW, Zhang H, Williams TA, Allen JS, Lacy EK, Robertson JD, Lanza GM, Wickline SA. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in early-stage atherosclerosis with alpha(v) beta3-integrin-targeted nanoparticles. Circulation. 2003;108:2270–2274. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093185.16083.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Barkhausen J, Ebert W, Heyer C, Debatin JF, Weinmann HJ. Detection of atherosclerotic plaque with gadofluorine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003;108:605–609. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079099.36306.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lipinski MJ, Amirbekian V, Frias JC, Aguinaldo JG, Mani V, Briley-Saebo KC, Fuster V, Fallon JT, Fisher EA, Fayad ZA. MRI to detect atherosclerosis with gadolinium-containing immunomicelles targeting the macrophage scavenger receptor. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:601–610. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.von zur Muhlen C, von Elverfeldt D, Moeller JA, Choudhury RP, Paul D, Hagemeyer CE, Olschewski M, Becker A, Neudorfer I, Bassler N, Schwarz M, Bode C, Peter K. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent targeted toward activated platelets allows in vivo detection of thrombosis and monitoring of thrombolysis. Circulation. 2008;118:258–267. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.753657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rogers WJ, Basu P. Factors regulating macrophage endocytosis of nanoparticles: implications for targeted magnetic resonance plaque imaging. Atherosclerosis. 2005;178:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Litovsky S, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Casscells SW, Willerson JT, Naghavi M. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-based method for quantifying recruitment of monocytes to mouse atherosclerotic lesions in vivo: enhancement by tissue necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, and interferon-gamma. Circulation. 2003;107:1545–1549. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000055323.57885.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nahrendorf M, Jaffer FA, Kelly KA, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, Libby P, Weissleder R. Noninvasive vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 imaging identifies inflammatory activation of cells in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006;114:1504–1511. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.646380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kang HW, Josephson L, Petrovsky A, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A., Jr Magnetic resonance imaging of inducible E-selectin expression in human endothelial cell culture. Bioconjug Chem. 2002;13:122–127. doi: 10.1021/bc0155521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.McAteer MA, Schneider JE, Ali ZA, Warrick N, Bursill CA, von zur Muhlen C, Greaves DR, Neubauer S, Channon KM, Choudhury RP. Magnetic resonance imaging of endothelial adhesion molecules in mouse atherosclerosis using dual-targeted microparticles of iron oxide. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:77–83. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.145466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Burtea C, Laurent S, Murariu O, Rattat D, Toubeau G, Verbruggen A, Vansthertem D, Vander Elst L, Muller RN. Molecular imaging of alpha v beta3 integrin expression in atherosclerotic plaques with a mimetic of RGD peptide grafted to Gd-DTPA. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;78:148–157. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvm115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zeebregts CJ, Meerwaldt R, Geelkerken RH. Carotid artery stenting: a 2009 update. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009;24:528–531. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328330c302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M, Iwama T. Preoperative magnetic resonance plaque imaging and carotid artery stenting: a review. Interv Neurol. 2012;1:31–38. doi: 10.1159/000338356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Interventional Neurology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES